Efficient synthesis of π-conjugated molecules incorporating fluorinated phenylene units through palladium-catalyzed iterative C(sp2)–H bond arylations

  1. 1,2 ,
  2. 1,2,3 ,
  3. 3 ,
  4. 1 and
  5. 1
1Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes, UMR 6226 CNRS-Université de Rennes 1 "Organométalliques, Matériaux et Catalyse", Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes, France
2Département de Chimie, UMMTO, University, BP 17 RP, 15000 Tizi-Ouzou, Algeria
3Laboratoire d’hydrométallurgie et chimie inorganique moléculaire, Faculté de Chimie, U.S.T.H.B. Bab-Ezzouar, Algeria
  1. Corresponding author email
Associate Editor: M. Rueping
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2012–2020. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.11.218
Received 22 Jun 2015, Accepted 07 Oct 2015, Published 28 Oct 2015
Full Research Paper
cc by logo

Abstract

We report herein a two or three step synthesis of fluorinated π-conjugated oligomers through iterative C–H bond arylations. Palladium-catalyzed desulfitative arylation of heteroarenes allowed in a first step the synthesis of fluoroaryl-heteroarene units in high yields. Then, the next steps involve direct arylation with aryl bromides catalyzed by PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) to afford triad or tetrad heteroaromatic compounds via regioselective activation of C(sp2)–H bonds.

Introduction

Fluorinated π-conjugated oligomers increasingly receive recent interest owing to their particular applications as electronic devices (e.g., in organic solar cells) [1-4]. In addition, several fluorinated heterobiaryls such as atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, or pitavastatin have been developed as drugs and commercialized by pharmaceutical companies [5]. In both areas, fluorine atoms can modify the properties of organic compounds. It is established that fluorine atoms dramatically influence both chemical properties and reactivities owing to its electronegativity, size, lipophilicity, and electrostatic interactions. For example, introduction of fluorine into natural products can result in beneficial biological properties [6]. On the other hand, fluorinated π-conjugated oligomers have unique π-staking arrangement resulting sometimes in specific electronic properties [3]. Hence, a practical method for the synthesis of fluorinated π-conjugated oligomers that will use the specificity of fluorine atoms is highly desirable for the chemist community. Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions are one of the most powerful technologies for the efficient synthesis of π-conjugated oligomers. As example, a π-conjugated thiophene triad incorporating a difluorinated phenylene unit has been previously synthesized in 60% yield using the Stille reaction of trimethyl(thiophen-2-yl)stannane and 1,4-difluoro-2,5-diiodobenzene (Figure 1a) [3]. However, this methodology required the pre-synthesis of the stannane derivative, which is not eco-friendly. More recently, the direct C–H bond arylation has appeared as one of the most sustainable protocols for the synthesis of poly(hetero)arenes in high yields in only a few steps with the respect of the environment [7-25]. Since the reports on transition metal-catalyzed direct arylation of polyfluorobenzenes by Fagnou (Figure 1b) [26], and others [27-34], this technology has been increasingly employed for the synthesis of fluorinated π-conjugated materials, but this strategy was limited to the synthesis of end-caped fluorene oligomers [35-43]. Organic molecules containing polyfluoroaryl groups have been also synthetized through direct olefination [44]. In 2012, Zhang and co-workers reported one example of the use of 3-bromo-1,2,4,5-tetrafluorobenzene with iodoanisole as coupling partner (Figure 1c) [45]. The reaction conditions tolerate the C–Br bond on the polyfluorobenzene allowing the synthesis of (hetero)aryl triads with a fluoroarene unit. More recently, our research group also reported the synthesis of (hetero)aryl triads from fluorinated arenes bearing a C–Br bond using iterative palladium-catalyzed direct arylations (Figure 1d) [46]. In a first step, the C–Br bond of fluorinated phenylene units was involved in palladium-catalyzed direct arylations with a set of heteroarenes (e.g., thiophenes, thiazoles, furans). Then, the resulting heteroarylated polyfluorobenzenes were arylated using PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) catalyst in the presence of KOAc as the base in DMA at 150 °C using a wide range of aryl bromides as coupling partners.

[1860-5397-11-218-1]

Figure 1: Different pathways for the synthesis of π-conjugated molecules incorporating fluorinated phenylene units. i) Pd(OAc)2, KOAc, DMA, 150 °C. ii) PdCl(C3H5)(dppb), KOAc, DMA, 150 °C ; ii) PdCl(C3H5)(dppb), KOAc, DMA, 150 °C; iii) PdCl2(CH3CN)2, Li2CO3, 1,4-dioxane, 140 °C.

On the other hand, benzenesulfonyl chlorides were recently introduced as powerful arylating agents, through metal-catalyzed C–H bond activation [47-55]. Such desulfitative direct arylations sometimes offered different regioselectivities, e.g., thiophenes were arylated in β-position instead of α-position with the classical procedure employing aryl halides as coupling partners [53,55] and benzofuran regioselectively led to C2 arylated compounds instead of the mixtures of C2 and C3 arylated products obtained with aryl bromides [56]. Moreover, these processes are very chemoselective, as the reactions only involve desulfitative coupling even in the presence of C–halogen bonds [57], which allow further orthogonal transformations. Moreover, a wide scope of benzenesulfonyl chlorides is commercially available at an affordable cost.

We report herein, a new synthetic pathway for fluorinated π-conjugated oligomers (i.e., dyads, triads, and tetrads). This novel strategy involves only palladium-catalyzed iterative C–H bond arylations. In a first step, PdCl2(CH3CN)2-catalyzed desulfitative regioselective arylations of heteroarenes using fluorinated benzenesulfonyl chlorides as coupling partners allowed the formation of heteroarylated polyfluorobenzenes. Then, in a second and third step, the PdCl(C3H5)(dppb)-catalyzed regioselective arylations using aryl halides as coupling partners furnished the desired triads or tetrads.

Results and Discussion

We started our investigation with the synthesis of a set of heteroarenes bearing a 1,2,3-trifluorobenzene motif (Scheme 1). Using our previous reaction conditions, namely 5 mol % PdCl2(CH3CN)2 in the presence of 3 equiv of Li2CO3 in dioxane at 140 °C, both 2-n-butylfuran and benzofuran reacted with 2,3,4-trifluorobenzenesulfonyl chloride to give the C5- and C2-arylated products 1 and 2 in 86% and 78% yields. Menthofuran, in which only the C2 position is available, also smoothly reacted with 2,3,4-trifluorobenzenesulfonyl chloride to give 3 in 84% yield. Using the same reaction conditions, N-methylpyrrole affords the 1-methyl-2-(2,3,4-trifluorophenyl)pyrrole (4) in 91% yield. It is important to note that 4 equiv of N-methylpyrrole were used in order to prevent the formation of the 2,5-diarylated pyrrole as a side product. Finally, both 2-pentylthiophene and benzothiophene were arylated in 76% and 82% yields, respectively. Notably, the thiophene derivative was regioselectively arylated at the C4 position and the benzothiophene at the C3 position, which are challenging positions to functionalize using aryl bromides as the coupling partners [58].

[1860-5397-11-218-i1]

Scheme 1: Pd-catalyzed desulfitative direct arylations of heteroarenes using 2,3,4-trifluorobenzenesulfonyl chloride as the arylating agent. i) PdCl2(CH3CN)2 (5 mol %), Li2CO3 (3 equiv), 1,4-dioxane, 140 °C, 48 h; aThe reaction was performed using 4 equiv of 1-methylpyrrole during 15 h.

Substrates 16 contain several reactive C–H bonds in palladium-catalyzed direct arylation using aryl bromides as coupling partners. Indeed, the regioselectivity of such reaction with these coupling partners needs to be investigated (Schemes 2–4). (2,3,4-Trifluorophenyl)furans 1 and 2 have two and three C–H bonds, respectively, which are susceptible to react under palladium-catalyzed direct arylation conditions, namely the C–H bond at the ortho position to the fluorine atom and the C–H bonds at C3 or C4 positions of the (benzo)furan (Scheme 2). We decided to employ the reaction conditions that we had previously described for both direct arylations of fluorobenzenes [46,59,60] and C3-arylation of furans [61,62] (i.e., 2 mol % PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) as catalyst associated to KOAc as base in DMA). We were pleased to find that 2-butyl-5-(2,3,4-trifluorophenyl)furan (1) was preferentially arylated on the electron-deficient ring whichever the aryl bromide was. For example, using 4-bromobenzonitrile or ethyl 4-bromobenzoate, the coupling products 7 and 8 were isolated in 70% and 64% yields, respectively. However, other regioisomers were detected in the crude mixtures in trace amounts (e.g., 11–16%), which resulted from the activation of the furyl C–H bond. In contrast to these examples, when the reaction was performed with a heteroaryl bromide such as 3-bromopyridine, the two regioisomers 9a and 9b were obtained in 45:55 ratio. On the other hand, it is well known that the C–H bond at the C-3 position of the benzofuran is very reactive in palladium-catalyzed direct arylation with aryl halides [62-64]. A similar reactivity trend was observed using 2-(2,3,4-trifluorophenyl)benzofuran (2) as starting material, which furnished the C3-arylated 2-(2,3,4-trifluorophenyl)benzofuran 10 in 58% yield with 92% regioselectivity. (Hetero)aryl triads containing a trifluorobenzene unit were synthetized using 2-(2,3,4-trifluorophenyl)menthofuran (3), in which the reactive C–H bonds are only present on the trifluorobenzene unit. Both 4-bromobenzonitrile or 4-bromonitrobenzene gave the arylated products 11 and 12 in good yields, whereas the coupling product with 4-bromotoluene, compound 13, was isolated in 35% yield. This lower yield might be explained by a slower oxidative addition rate to the palladium with this electron-rich aryl bromide.

[1860-5397-11-218-i2]

Scheme 2: Pd-catalyzed second arylation of 1 and 2. i) PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) (2 mol %), KOAc (2 equiv), DMA, 150 °C, 16 h. aRegioselectivity (a:b) ratio determined from crude 1H NMR.

Next, we investigated the reactivity of 1-methyl-2-(2,3,4-trifluorophenyl)pyrrole (4) in a second direct arylation (Scheme 3). Using of PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) catalyst and KOAc as base in DMA, the C5 position of the pyrrole unit was arylated in 82% yield with a complete regioselectivity; whereas the C–H bond at C5’ position on the trifluorobenzene unit remained untouched. Moreover, under similar reaction conditions, using 4-bromobenzaldehyde or 4-bromopyridine as coupling partners, a C–H arylation on the trifluorobenzene moiety of 14 did not proceed.

[1860-5397-11-218-i3]

Scheme 3: Pd-catalyzed direct regioselective arylation of 1-methyl-2-(2,3,4-trifluorophenyl)pyrrole (4). i) PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) (2 mol %), KOAc (2 equiv), DMA, 150 °C, 16 h.

We surveyed next the reactivity of 3-(2,3,4-trifluorophenyl)thiophene derivatives 5 and 6 in palladium catalyzed direct arylation using the same reaction conditions (Scheme 4). As expected, with 2-pentyl-4-(2,3,4-trifluorophenyl)thiophene (5) – which has a very reactive C–H bond at the thienyl C5-position – the arylation took place regioselectively at this position, whereas the C–H bonds on trifluorobenzene unit remained untouched. C2,C3-Diarylated thiophene 15 was obtained in 68% yield. Then, a third iterative palladium-catalyzed direct arylation was performed from 15 using the same reaction conditions and 4-bromobenzaldehyde as the coupling partner. The arylation occurred at the ortho-position of the fluorine atom to give 16 in 60% yield (Scheme 4, top). A similar iterative C–H bond arylation process was conducted starting from 3-(2,3,4-trifluorophenyl)benzothiophene (6) (Scheme 4, bottom). The first direct arylation, using ethyl 4-bromobenzoate as coupling partner, occurred at the benzothienyl C–H bond to give the C2,C3 diarylated benzothiophene 17 in a good yield of 73%. The second direct arylation allowed the formation of the tetra(hetero)aryl compound 18 in 53% yield.

[1860-5397-11-218-i4]

Scheme 4: Pd-catalyzed direct regioselective arylation of 3-(2,3,4-trifluorophenyl)thiophenes. i) PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) (2 mol %), KOAc (2 equiv), DMA, 150 °C, 16 h.

Having demonstrated that palladium-catalyzed iterative direct arylations might be an efficient synthetic pathway for the synthesis of (hetero)aryl triads containing a trifluorobenzene unit, we decided then to turn our attention to the synthesis of (hetero)aryl triads containing a difluorobenzene unit. As previously, we synthesized a set of difluorobenzene-substituted heteroarenes using our previous palladium-catalyzed desulfitative arylation conditions (Scheme 5). 2,4-Difluorobenzenesulfonyl chloride was efficiently coupled with 2-n-butylfuran, benzofuran, and menthofuran to give the C2 arylated furans 1921 in 64–82% yields. Next, 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-methylpyrrole, in which one of the reactive C2 and C5 C–H bonds was already arylated, was subjected to the same reaction allowing the formation of C2,C5-diarylated pyrrole 22 in excellent yield. Then, 3,4-difluorobenzenesulfonyl chloride also shown an excellent reactivity as desulfitative coupling partner with menthofuran and 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-methylpyrrole to furnish the arylated heteroarenes 23 and 24 in 82% and 79% yields, respectively.

[1860-5397-11-218-i5]

Scheme 5: Pd-catalyzed desulfitative direct arylations of heteroarenes using difluorobenzenesulfonyl chlorides as the arylating agents. i) PdCl2(CH3CN)2 (5 mol %), Li2CO3 (3 equiv), 1,4-dioxane, 140 °C, 48 h.

With C2-(difluorophenyl)heteroarenes 1924 in hands, we studied their reactivity in Pd-catalyzed direct arylations using PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) as catalyst in the presence of KOAc as the base and aryl bromide as coupling partners (Scheme 6). On 2-(3,4-difluorophenyl)menthofuran (23), the two C–H bonds at ortho-position to a fluorine atom might be arylated under this reaction conditions. Using 4-bromobenzaldehyde as coupling partner, a mixture of two regioisomers in 82:18 ratio was obtained, and the C5 arylation product 25 (major regioisomer) was isolated after flash chromatography in 53% yield as pure product. It is important to note that 25 results from the activation of the less hindered C–H bond. When the reaction was performed with 2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)menthofuran (21), the position flanked by two fluorine atoms was the most reactive. Only the regioisomer 26 was observed in crude GC–MS and 1H NMR and was isolated in 68% yield. Using the more challenging substrate 2-butyl-5-(2,4-difluorophenyl)furan (19) with 4-bromobenzonitrile, a mixture of three regioisomers was formed in a 61:32:7 ratio. Only the major regioisomer 27, in which the arylation happend at the C–H bond flanked by the two fluorine atoms, has been isolated in pure form. The other regioisomers might result from the activation of a C–H bond on the furan ring and of the other C–H bond at ortho-position to the fluorine atom. In contrast to (2,3,4-trifluorophenyl)benzofuran 2 – in which the benzofuryl C–H bond is the most reactive – 2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)benzofuran (20) only reacted through the activation of the electron-deficient phenyl ring to afford the heteroaryl triad 28 in 56% yield. We imputed this shift of regioselectivity to the high acidity of the C–H bond flanked by the two fluorine atoms. Then, the regioselectivity of Pd-catalyzed second direct arylation was investigated with 2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-methylpyrrole (22) and 2-(3,4-difluorophenyl)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-methylpyrrole (24). As expected, in the presence of the 2,4-difluorophenyl motif, the arylation exclusively took place between the two fluorine atoms to allow the formation of tetramer 29 in 51% yield.

[1860-5397-11-218-i6]

Scheme 6: Pd-catalyzed second direct regioselective arylation of difluorophenylheteroarenes 19-23. i) PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) (2 mol %), KOAc (2 equiv), DMA, 150 °C, 16 h. [a] C5/C2 regioisomers ratio determined on crude 1H NMR ; [b] C3'/C3/C5' regioisomers ratio determined on crude 1H NMR.

We also investigated iterative direct arylations for the construction of (hetero)aryl triads or tetrads containing a mono-fluorinated phenyl motif (Scheme 7). In 2006, it has been already demonstrated that the palladium-catalyzed direct arylation of fluorobenzene proceeds in very low yield [26]. Based on our previous works, in which we have demonstrated that a halogen atom such as chlorine or bromine at the C3 or C4 position enhances its reactivity [65], we decided to use 2-chloro-4-fluorobenzenesulfonyl chloride as the first arylating agent. We firstly selected menthofuran as starting material for the synthesis of (hetero)aryl triads (Scheme 7, top). Using our conditions for desulfitative arylation, 2-(2-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)menthofuran (30) was obtained in 74% yield. Then, a second arylation was performed using 2 mol % of PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) catalyst and KOAc in DMA. We were pleased to find that only one regioisomer was formed, as the arylation exclusively occurred at the C–H bond between fluorine and chlorine atoms. The desired (hetero)aryl triad 31 was isolated in moderate yield, due to the formation of a relatively large amount of homocoupling product of the aryl bromide partner. On the other hand, we also performed similar sequential C–H bond arylations from 2-pentylthiophene as starting material (Scheme 7, bottom). The desulfitative arylation occurred at the expected the C4-position to afford 4-(2-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-2-pentylthiophene (32) in 78% yield. Then, we found that the thienyl C5–H bond reacted faster than the phenyl C–H bond at the ortho-position to chloro and fluorine atoms. Indeed using 3-bromoquinoline, the (hetero)aryl triad 33 was obtained in 73% yield as a single regioisomer.

[1860-5397-11-218-i7]

Scheme 7: Pd-catalyzed iterative direct arylations of heteroarenes–fluorobenzene triads and tetrad. i) PdCl2(CH3CN)2 (5 mol %), Li2CO3 (3 equiv), 1,4-dioxane, 140 °C, 48 h; ii) PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) (2 mol %), KOAc (2 equiv), DMA, 150 °C, 16 h.

On the other hand, Zhang and co-workers developed a straightforward and practical method for the synthesis of end-capped pentafluorobenzene-substituted heteroarenes, which are an important class of materials, through palladium-catalyzed oxidative cross-coupling of perfluoroarenes with aromatic heterocycles [36]. Therefore, we decided to investigate the reactivity of pentafluorobenzenesulfonyl chloride for the construction of end-capped pentafluorobenzene-substituted heteroarenes through direct desulfitative arylation (Scheme 8). We were pleased to find that using standard reaction conditions, 2-n-butylfuran and benzofuran were arylated at C5- or C2-positions in high yields. Moreover, this methodology allowed the synthesis of challenging C4-arylated thiophene 36 in 73% yield.

[1860-5397-11-218-i8]

Scheme 8: Reactivity of pentafluorobenzenesulfonyl chloride in Pd-catalyzed direct desulfitative arylation of heteroarenes. i) PdCl2(CH3CN)2 (5 mol %), Li2CO3 (3 equiv), 1,4-dioxane, 140 °C, 48 h.

Conclusion

In summary, we have developed an efficient synthesis of complex heteroaryl triads and tetrads through palladium-catalyzed iterative direct arylations. Tri-, di-, and monofluorophenyl-substituted heteroarenes were synthesized in high yields and high regioselectivities through a desulfitative direct arylation of several heteroarenes using fluorinated arylsulfonyl chlorides. Then, direct arylation of the (poly)fluorophenyl units was performed using aryl bromides as coupling partners. In some specific cases, we have demonstrated that C2−H bonds of (benzo)thiophene, C5−H bonds of pyrrole, and C3−H bonds of (benzo)furans are more reactive than the C−H bonds of tri- and fluorobenzenes toward palladium-catalyzed direct arylation. This strategy allows the straightforward synthesis of heteroarylated polyfluorobiphenyls in good yields via two or three sequential iterative palladium-catalyzed direct arylations.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Experimental and analytical data.
Format: PDF Size: 219.5 KB Download

References

  1. Mishra, A.; Bäuerle, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 2020–2067. doi:10.1002/anie.201102326
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Newman, C. R.; Frisbie, C. D.; da Silva Filho, D. A.; Brédas, J.-L.; Ewbank, P. C.; Mann, K. R. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 4436–4451. doi:10.1021/cm049391x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Crouch, D. J.; Skabara, P. J.; Lohr, J. E.; McDouall, J. J. W.; Heeney, M.; McCulloch, I.; Sparrowe, D.; Shkunov, M.; Coles, S. J.; Horton, P. N.; Hursthouse, M. B. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 6567–6578. doi:10.1021/cm051563i
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  4. Naraso; Nishida, J.-i.; Kumaki, D.; Tokito, S.; Yamashita, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9598–9599. doi:10.1021/ja0630083
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Wang, J.; Sánchez-Roselló, M.; Aceña, J. L.; del Pozo, C.; Sorochinsky, A. E.; Fustero, S.; Soloshonok, V. A.; Liu, H. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 2432–2506. doi:10.1021/cr4002879
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Müller, K.; Faeh, C.; Diederich, F. Science 2007, 317, 1881–1886. doi:10.1126/science.1131943
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Bellina, F.; Cauteruccio, S.; Rossi, R. Curr. Org. Chem. 2008, 12, 774–790. doi:10.2174/138527208784567205
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Kakiuchi, F.; Kochi, T. Synthesis 2008, 3013–3039. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1067256
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Ackermann, L.; Vicente, R.; Kapdi, A. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9792–9826. doi:10.1002/anie.200902996
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Bellina, F.; Rossi, R. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 1082–1146. doi:10.1021/cr9000836
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Bellina, F.; Rossi, R. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 10269–10310. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2009.10.015
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Chen, X.; Engle, K. M.; Wang, D.-H.; Yu, J.-Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5094–5115. doi:10.1002/anie.200806273
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Lyons, T. W.; Sanford, M. S. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 1147–1169. doi:10.1021/cr900184e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Beck, E. M.; Gaunt, M. J. Top. Curr. Chem. 2010, 292, 85–121. doi:10.1007/128_2009_15
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Roger, J.; Gottumukkala, A. L.; Doucet, H. ChemCatChem 2010, 2, 20–40. doi:10.1002/cctc.200900074
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Satoh, T.; Miura, M. Synthesis 2010, 3395–3409. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1258225
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Sun, C.-L.; Li, B.-J.; Shi, Z.-J. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 677–685. doi:10.1039/b908581e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Cho, S. H.; Kim, J. Y.; Kwak, J.; Chang, S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 5068–5083. doi:10.1039/c1cs15082k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Kuhl, N.; Hopkinson, M. N.; Wencel-Delord, J.; Glorius, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10236–10254. doi:10.1002/anie.201203269
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Li, B.-J.; Shi, Z.-J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 5588–5598. doi:10.1039/c2cs35096c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. White, M. C. Synlett 2012, 23, 2746–2748. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1317701
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Kozhushkov, S. I.; Ackermann, L. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 886–896. doi:10.1039/C2SC21524A
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. He, M.; Soulé, J.-F.; Doucet, H. ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 1824–1859. doi:10.1002/cctc.201402020
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Rossi, R.; Bellina, F.; Lessi, M.; Manzini, C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 17–117. doi:10.1002/adsc.201300922
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Yuan, K.; Soulé, J.-F.; Doucet, H. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 978–991. doi:10.1021/cs501686d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Lafrance, M.; Rowley, C. N.; Woo, T. K.; Fagnou, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8754–8756. doi:10.1021/ja062509l
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  27. Do, H.-Q.; Daugulis, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1128–1129. doi:10.1021/ja077862l
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Zhao, D.; Wang, W.; Lian, S.; Yang, F.; Lan, J.; You, J. Chem. – Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1337–1340. doi:10.1002/chem.200802001
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Fan, S.; Yang, J.; Zhang, X. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4374–4377. doi:10.1021/ol201706t
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Zhao, H.; Wei, Y.; Xu, J.; Kan, J.; Su, W.; Hong, M. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 882–893. doi:10.1021/jo102175f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Bernhammer, J. C.; Huynh, H. V. Organometallics 2012, 31, 5121–5130. doi:10.1021/om300464b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Yuan, D.; Huynh, H. V. Organometallics 2012, 31, 405–412. doi:10.1021/om2010029
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Guo, F.; Han, J.; Mao, S.; Li, J.; Geng, X.; Yu, J.; Wang, L. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 6267–6270. doi:10.1039/c3ra40374b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Miao, T.; Wang, L. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 429–436. doi:10.1002/adsc.201300587
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Matsubara, Y.; Kimura, A.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Yoshida, Z.-i. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5541–5544. doi:10.1021/ol802337v
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. He, C.-Y.; Fan, S.; Zhang, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 12850–12852. doi:10.1021/ja106046p
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  37. Okamoto, T.; Nakahara, K.; Saeki, A.; Seki, S.; Oh, J. H.; Akkerman, H. B.; Bao, Z.; Matsuo, Y. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 1646–1649. doi:10.1021/cm200356y
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Liu, D.-P.; Chen, Q.; Zhao, Y.-C.; Zhang, L.-M.; Qi, A.-D.; Han, B.-H. ACS Macro Lett. 2013, 2, 522–526. doi:10.1021/mz4001699
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Liu, S.-Y.; Shi, M.-M.; Huang, J.-C.; Jin, Z.-N.; Hu, X.-L.; Pan, J.-Y.; Li, H.-Y.; Jen, A. K.-Y.; Chen, H.-Z. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 2795–2805. doi:10.1039/c2ta01318e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Wakioka, M.; Kitano, Y.; Ozawa, F. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 370–374. doi:10.1021/ma302558z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Okamoto, K.; Zhang, J.; Housekeeper, J. B.; Marder, S. R.; Luscombe, C. K. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 8059–8078. doi:10.1021/ma401190r
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Chen, T.-H.; Popov, I.; Zenasni, O.; Daugulis, O.; Miljanic, O. Š. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 6846–6848. doi:10.1039/c3cc41564c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  43. Lai, Y.-Y.; Tung, T.-C.; Liang, W.-W.; Cheng, Y.-J. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 2978–2988. doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00488
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  44. Zhang, X.; Fan, S.; He, C.-Y.; Wan, X.; Min, Q.-Q.; Yang, J.; Jiang, Z.-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 4506–4507. doi:10.1021/ja908434e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  45. Chen, F.; Min, Q.-Q.; Zhang, X. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 2992–2998. doi:10.1021/jo300036d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Yan, T.; Chen, L.; Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, P. H.; Doucet, H. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 4177–4183. doi:10.1021/jo400221x
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  47. Zhao, X.; Dimitrijević, E.; Dong, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3466–3467. doi:10.1021/ja900200g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Zhang, M.; Zhang, S.; Liu, M.; Cheng, J. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 11522–11524. doi:10.1039/c1cc14718h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  49. Yu, X.; Li, X.; Wan, B. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 7479–7482. doi:10.1039/c2ob26270c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  50. Jafarpour, F.; Olia, M. B. A.; Hazrati, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 3407–3412. doi:10.1002/adsc.201300707
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  51. Miao, T.; Li, P.; Wang, G.-W.; Wang, L. Chem. – Asian J. 2013, 8, 3185–3190. doi:10.1002/asia.201300913
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  52. Beladhria, A.; Yuan, K.; Ben Ammar, H.; Soulé, J.-F.; Ben Salem, R.; Doucet, H. Synthesis 2014, 46, 2515–2523. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1340188
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  53. Yuan, K.; Doucet, H. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 392–396. doi:10.1039/C3SC52420E
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  54. Jin, R.; Yuan, K.; Chatelain, E.; Soulé, J.-F.; Doucet, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 3831–3841. doi:10.1002/adsc.201400736
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  55. Hfaiedh, A.; Yuan, K.; Ben Ammar, H.; Ben Hassine, B.; Soulé, J.-F.; Doucet, H. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 1794–1804. doi:10.1002/cssc.201403429
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  56. Loukotova, L.; Yuan, K.; Doucet, H. ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 1303–1309. doi:10.1002/cctc.201301077
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  57. Skhiri, A.; Beladhria, A.; Yuan, K.; Soulé, J.-F.; Ben Salem, R.; Doucet, H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 4428–4436. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201500354
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  58. This unique regioselectivity was attributed to a mechanism involving electrophilic palladation through a Pd(II)/Pd(IV) catalytic cycle (see ref. [53]).
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  59. Yan, T.; Bheeter, C. B.; Doucet, H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 7152–7163. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201301131
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  60. Zhao, L.; Yan, T.; Bruneau, C.; Doucet, H. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 352–360. doi:10.1039/C3CY00757J
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  61. Gottumukkala, A. L.; Doucet, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 2183–2188. doi:10.1002/adsc.200800410
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  62. Ionita, M.; Roger, J.; Doucet, H. ChemSusChem 2010, 3, 367–376. doi:10.1002/cssc.200900258
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  63. Liégault, B.; Petrov, I.; Gorelsky, S. I.; Fagnou, K. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 1047–1060. doi:10.1021/jo902515z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  64. Carrër, A.; Brinet, D.; Florent, J.-C.; Rousselle, P.; Bertounesque, E. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 1316–1327. doi:10.1021/jo202060k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  65. Yan, T.; Zhao, L.; He, M.; Soulé, J.-F.; Bruneau, C.; Doucet, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 1586–1596. doi:10.1002/adsc.201400038
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities