<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//BEILSTEIN-INSTITUT//DTD Journal Article DTD v0.3.8 20091009//EN" "http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/content/xml/journalarticle.v038.dtd">
<article locale="en" public-id="1860-5397-6-2" publisher="Beilstein-Institut" journal="Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry" journal-abbreviated="Beilstein J. Org. Chem." journal-code="bjoc" issn="1860-5397" coden="BJOCBH" year="2010" volume="6" article="2" type="full-research-paper">
<author first-name="Matej" last-name="Cvetko" email="Matej.Cvetko@rra-mura.si" affiliations="a1 a2" corresponding-author="yes"/>
<author first-name="Milan" last-name="Ambro&#382;i&#269;" affiliations="a2"/>
<author first-name="Samo" last-name="Kralj" affiliations="a2 a3"/>
<affiliation id="a1">Regional Development Agency Mura Ltd, Lendavska 5a, 9000 Murska Sobota, Slovenia</affiliation>
<affiliation id="a2">Laboratory of Physics of Complex Systems, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, Koro&#353;ka 160, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia</affiliation>
<affiliation id="a3">Condensed Matter Physics Department, Jo&#382;ef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia</affiliation>
<editor first-name="Sabine" last-name="Laschat" role="guest-editor"/>
<submission-date day="16" month="10" year="2009"/>
<acceptance-date day="15" month="12" year="2009"/>
<publication-date day="7" month="1" year="2010"/>
<title>
<chunk>Competition between local disordering and global ordering fields in nematic liquid crystals</chunk>
</title>
<keyword>
<chunk>disorder</chunk>
</keyword>
<keyword>
<chunk>Imry-Ma theorem</chunk>
</keyword>
<keyword>
<chunk>liquid crystals</chunk>
</keyword>
<keyword>
<chunk>memory effect</chunk>
</keyword>
<keyword>
<chunk>orientational order</chunk>
</keyword>
<abstract-section>
<paragraph>
<chunk>We study the influence of external electric or magnetic field </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> on orientational ordering of nematic liquid crystals or of other rod-like objects (e.g. nanotubes immersed in a liquid) in the presence of random anisotropy field type of disorder. The Lebwohl&#8211;Lasher lattice type of semi-microscopic approach is used at zero temperature. Therefore, results are valid well below the transition into the isotropic phase. We calculate the correlation function of systems as a function of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>, concentration </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk> of impurities imposing random anisotropy field disorder, the disorder strength </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk> and system dimensionality (2D and 3D systems). In order to probe memory effects we calculate correlation length </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk> for random and homogeneous initial configurations. We determine the crossover fields </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk>) separating roughly the ordered and disordered regime. Memory effects are apparent only in the latter case, i.e. for </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&lt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk>.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk bold="yes">PACS numbers</chunk>
<chunk>: 47.51.+a, 47.54.-r, 07.05.Tp, 61.30.-v</chunk>
</paragraph>
</abstract-section>
<abstract-graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-graphical-abstract"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.3762/bjoc.6.2"/>
<section>
<title>
<chunk>Introduction</chunk>
</title>
<paragraph>
<chunk>For years there has been a strong interest in the phase and structural behavior of randomly perturbed liquid crystals (LCs) </chunk>
<link target="b1"/>
<chunk>. Such systems could be used in various electro-optical applications. On the other hand they represent also an adequate testing ground </chunk>
<link target="b2"/>
<chunk> to study fundamental questions concerning the impact of disorder </chunk>
<link target="b3"/>
<link target="b4"/>
<link target="b5"/>
<link target="b6"/>
<chunk> on various phase and structural transitions.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>Most studies so far have been carried out in thermotropic nematic LC phases, which exhibit long range orientational order </chunk>
<link target="b7"/>
<chunk>. To enforce disorder to LC ordering one either confines LC to various porous matrices </chunk>
<link target="b8"/>
<link target="b9"/>
<link target="b10"/>
<link target="b11"/>
<link target="b12"/>
<chunk> (e.g., aerogels, Controlled-pore glass, Vycor glass) or mixes LCs with nanoparticles. For the latter purpose aerosil nanoparticles </chunk>
<link target="b13"/>
<link target="b14"/>
<link target="b15"/>
<chunk> are particularly adequate. They form random networks, the structure of which can be altered by varying the concentration of nanoparticles. At least three qualitatively different regimes can be realized </chunk>
<link target="b16"/>
<chunk>.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>Studies so far have mainly focused on structural and phase behavior </chunk>
<link target="b8"/>
<link target="b9"/>
<link target="b10"/>
<link target="b11"/>
<link target="b12"/>
<link target="b13"/>
<link target="b14"/>
<link target="b15"/>
<link target="b16"/>
<link target="b17"/>
<link target="b18"/>
<chunk>. It has been shown that the isotropic nematic phase transition is typically replaced by the paranematic&#8211;nematic (PN&#8211;N) phase transition. The transition temperature in most cases decreases with increased disorder strength. If disorder is strong enough the transition can disappear. In the nematic phase memory effects can be observed revealing to some extent glass-like features.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>To our knowledge none of the studies so far have systematically explored the effect of external ordering field (</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>) in such systems. This is the topic of our paper. We consider the competition between local disordering fields and the global external magnetic or electric ordering field. Local random fields can be in practice imposed geometrically. Experimental examples are LCs confined to a porous matrix </chunk>
<link target="b1"/>
<chunk>, mixtures of LCs and aerosil nanoparticles </chunk>
<link target="b12"/>
<link target="b13"/>
<link target="b14"/>
<link target="b15"/>
<chunk>, binary mixtures of different rodlike objects which tend to be oriented perpendicularly </chunk>
<link target="b19"/>
<chunk>, and nanotubes immersed in liquid crystals </chunk>
<link target="b20"/>
<link target="b21"/>
<chunk>. We focus on </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> induced erasing of memory effects in such systems using the Lebwohl&#8211;Lasher </chunk>
<link target="b22"/>
<chunk> type lattice model deep in the nematic phase.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>The structure of the article is as follows. First we present the semi-microscopic lattice model that we use. Then the results are presented and discussed. In the following section we summarize our results. Some numerical details are summarized in the last section.</chunk>
</paragraph>
</section>
<section>
<title>
<chunk>Model</chunk>
</title>
<paragraph>
<chunk>We consider an orthogonal cubic lattice with </chunk>
<inline-float target="i1"/>
<chunk> cylindrically symmetric particles positioned at equidistant sites in the space with </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">d</chunk>
<chunk> dimensions. The nearest neighbour&#8217;s distance is taken as a unit, thus the side of the cell has the length </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">L</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">N</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">0</chunk>
<chunk>. Local orientation of a particle at the site with index </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#945;</chunk>
<chunk> is given by a unit vector &#8211; director </chunk>
<chunk bold="yes" italic="yes">S</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes" subscript="yes">&#945;</chunk>
<chunk>. We further set at randomly chosen sites of concentration </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk> cylindrically symmetric quenched impurities enforcing orientational ordering along </chunk>
<chunk bold="yes" italic="yes">e</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes" subscript="yes">&#945;</chunk>
<chunk>. The orientations of impurities are randomly chosen without any preferred global orientation. We also impose a homogeneous external (e.g., electric or magnetic) ordering field </chunk>
<chunk bold="yes" italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk bold="yes" italic="yes">e</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>, which tends to reorient the director field along </chunk>
<chunk bold="yes" italic="yes">e</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>. Systems with the head-to-tail invariance, where &#177;</chunk>
<chunk bold="yes" italic="yes">S</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes" subscript="yes">&#945;</chunk>
<chunk> orientations are equivalent, are taken into account. This property is characteristic for most LC molecules (where several structural details are averaged out via relatively fast molecular rotations) or nanotubes. The corresponding interaction energy of the system can be expressed as </chunk>
<link target="b6"/>
<link target="b8"/>
<link target="b23"/>
</paragraph>
<float target="e1"/>
<paragraph>
<chunk>The parameter </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">J</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;0 describes the ordering interaction among neighbouring molecules tending to orient directors parallel. The index </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#945;</chunk>
<chunk> in the double sum counts all the particles, and the indices </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#946;</chunk>
<chunk> run over the 1st nearest neighbours of the </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#945;</chunk>
<chunk>-th particle. At randomly chosen sites of concentration </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk> we additionally place rigid impurities which are coupled with surrounding directors by the random anisotropy type interaction </chunk>
<link target="b24"/>
<link target="b25"/>
<chunk> of anchoring strength </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk> &gt; 0. At the sites with impurities </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes" subscript="yes">&#945;</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;1 while at remaining sites </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes" subscript="yes">&#945;</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;0.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>We describe ordering in the Cartesian coordinate frame (</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">x</chunk>
<chunk>,</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">y</chunk>
<chunk>,</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">z</chunk>
<chunk>), whose axes point along unit vectors </chunk>
<chunk bold="yes">e</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes" subscript="yes">x</chunk>
<chunk>, </chunk>
<chunk bold="yes">e</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes" subscript="yes">y</chunk>
<chunk> and </chunk>
<chunk bold="yes">e</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes" subscript="yes">z</chunk>
<chunk>, respectively. The external field is oriented along a chosen axis, e.g., </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">x</chunk>
<chunk>-axis. We consider behaviour in two and three dimensions, to which we henceforth refer as 2D and 3D, respectively.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>For latter convenience we scale quantities in </chunk>
<link target="e1"/>
<chunk> with respect to </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">J</chunk>
<chunk>: </chunk>
<inline-float target="i2"/>
<chunk>, </chunk>
<inline-float target="i3"/>
<chunk>, </chunk>
<inline-float target="i4"/>
<chunk>, i.e. we set </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">J</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;1 in (1). We henceforth omit the tildes. Some details of the minimization of the total energy </chunk>
<link target="e1"/>
<chunk> are given in the numerical approach section. We have neglected the role of thermal fluctuations and consider configurations at zero temperature. In case of nematic ordering in liquid crystals such assumption is sensible deep in the nematic phase (i.e. well below the isotropic-nematic LC phase transition temperature).</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>In simulations we either originate from randomly distributed orientations of directors, or from homogeneously aligned samples along a symmetry breaking direction. In the latter case the directors are initially homogeneously aligned along </chunk>
<chunk bold="yes">e</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes" subscript="yes">x</chunk>
<chunk>. We henceforth refer to these cases as the i) random and ii)&#160;homogeneous samples, respectively. The i) random case can be experimentally realized by quenching the system from the isotropic phase to the ordered phase without an external field (i.e., </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;0). This can be achieved either via a sudden decrease of temperature or sudden increase of pressure. The ii) homogeneous case can be realized by applying first a strong homogeneous external field </chunk>
<chunk bold="yes" italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> along a symmetry breaking direction. After a well enough alignment is achieved the field is switched off.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>In order to diminish the influence of statistical variations we carry out several simulations (typically </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">N</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">rep</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;10) for a given set of parameters (i.e., </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk>, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk> and a chosen initial condition).</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>From obtained configurations we calculate the orientational correlation function </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">G</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk>). It measures orientational correlation of LC directors as a function of their mutual separation </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk> (</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;1 for nearest neighbours). We define it in two dimensional (2D) ensembles as</chunk>
</paragraph>
<float target="e2"/>
<paragraph>
<chunk>and in three dimensions (3D) as</chunk>
</paragraph>
<float target="e3"/>
<paragraph>
<chunk>The brackets </chunk>
<inline-float target="i5"/>
<chunk> denote the average over all lattice sites that are separated for a distance </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk>. If the directors are completely homogeneously aligned along a single direction it follows </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">G</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk>)&#160;=&#160;1. On the other hand </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">G</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk>)&#160;=&#160;0 reflects completely uncorrelated directors. Since each director is parallel with itself, it holds </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">G</chunk>
<chunk>(0)&#160;=&#160;1. The correlation function is a decreasing function of the distance </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk>.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>In order to obtain structural details from a calculated </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">G</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk>) dependence we use the ansatz</chunk>
</paragraph>
<float target="e4"/>
<paragraph>
<chunk>with adjustable parameters </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk>, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m</chunk>
<chunk>, and </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk>. The correlation length </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk> estimates the average domain in which directors are significantly correlated. The parameter </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m</chunk>
<chunk> measures the distribution width of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk> values. Presence of a single correlation length in the system is reflected in </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m&#160;</chunk>
<chunk>&#8776;&#160;1. A value of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk> reveals the degree of ordering within the system. The case </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;0 indicates the short range order (SRO). A finite value of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk> reveals either the long range order (LRO) or quasi long range order (QLRO). To distinguish between these two cases a finite size analysis </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">L</chunk>
<chunk>) must be carried out where </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">L</chunk>
<chunk> represents the typical linear size of the system. If </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">L</chunk>
<chunk>) saturates at a finite value the system exhibits LRO. If </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">L</chunk>
<chunk>) dependence exhibits algebraic dependence on </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">L</chunk>
<chunk> the system possesses QLRO.</chunk>
</paragraph>
</section>
<section>
<title>
<chunk>Results</chunk>
</title>
<paragraph>
<chunk>We study the influence of an external ordering field on nematic ordering which is orientationally perturbed by randomly distributed impurities of concentration </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk>. We vary the history of samples, concentration </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk> of impurities, anchoring strength </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk> between LC molecules and impurities, dimensionality of the system and the external field strength </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>. We consider 2D and 3D systems. Concerning histories we either originate from initially homogeneously aligned directors or from completely disordered configuration.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>For a given set of control parameters we calculate a configuration of the system by minimizing the interaction energy. The configuration reflects the interplay among elastic, external ordering field and surface disordering tendencies. The external ordering (</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>) and impurities introduce additional characteristic scales into the system. The relative strength of elastic and external ordering field contribution is measured by the external field extrapolation length </chunk>
<link target="b7"/>
<chunk> </chunk>
<inline-float target="i6"/>
<chunk>. In the case of ordered LC-substrate interfaces the relative importance of surface anchoring term is measured by the surface extrapolation length </chunk>
<link target="b7"/>
<chunk> </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">d</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">e</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">J</chunk>
<chunk>/</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk>. The external ordering field is expected to override the surface anchoring tendency in the limit </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">d</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">e</chunk>
<chunk>/</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#160;</chunk>
<chunk>&gt;&gt;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#160;1</chunk>
<chunk>. However, if LC-substrate interfaces introduce a disorder into the system, then instead of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">d</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">e</chunk>
<chunk> the so called Imry-Ma scale </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">IM</chunk>
<chunk> characterizes the ordering of the system. It expresses the relative importance of elastic ordering and surface disordering term. It roughly holds </chunk>
<link target="b26"/>
</paragraph>
<float target="e5"/>
<paragraph>
<chunk>where </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">dis</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;</chunk>
<inline-float target="i13"/>
<chunk>&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk> measures the disorder strength.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>From obtained orientational ordering we calculate the correlation function </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">G</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk>). From it we extract the average correlation length </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk> using </chunk>
<link target="e4"/>
<chunk>. In case that the disorder dominates the system behavior one expects </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">IM</chunk>
<chunk>. On the contrary, the dominance of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> is reflected in </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>Note that for cases studied we obtain qualitatively similar results for 2D and 3D systems. Consequently, we carry out more detailed simulations for 2D systems which demand less computational time.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>A typical </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">G</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk>) dependence in 2D and 3D is shown in </chunk>
<link target="f1" fragment="a"/>
<chunk> and </chunk>
<link target="f1" fragment="b"/>
<chunk>, respectively. We plot </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">G</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk>) for both homogeneous and random initial configuration in the presence of external field and without it. For </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;0 it holds </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(hom)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk>, where superscripts (hom) and (ran) denote correlation lengths in homogeneous and random samples, respectively. The reason behind this are stronger elastic frustrations in random samples, as analyzed in more detail in our previous paper </chunk>
<link target="b25"/>
<chunk>. Furthermore, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk> roughly obeys the Imry-Ma scaling for low enough external fields (i.e. </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&lt;&lt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>), suggesting </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">IM</chunk>
<chunk>. The presence of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> becomes apparent when </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">&#8776;</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&lt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">IM</chunk>
<chunk>, which is shown in </chunk>
<link target="f1"/>
<chunk>.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<float target="f1"/>
<paragraph>
<chunk>We also note that in random samples </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">G</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk>&#8594;&#8734;) always equals zero </chunk>
<link target="b25"/>
<chunk> for </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;0 indicating short range order. On the contrary in homogeneous samples we obtain a finite value of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk> if the disorder strength is not too large. In </chunk>
<link target="f1"/>
<chunk> we see that the presence of external field can enforce a finite value of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk> also in random samples.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>In </chunk>
<link target="f2"/>
<chunk> we plot </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk> as a function of 1/</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> for both homogeneous and random samples. For strong enough magnetic fields one expects </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> </chunk>
<inline-float target="i13"/>
<chunk> 1/</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>. On the other hand for a weak enough </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> the value of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk> is dominantly influenced by the disorder strength. Indeed, we observe a crossover behavior in </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">(B)</chunk>
<chunk> dependence on varying </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>. The crossover between two qualitatively different regimes roughly takes place at the crossover field </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk>. We define it as the field below which the difference between </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk> and </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(hom)</chunk>
<chunk> is apparent. Below </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk> the disordered regime takes place, where </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958; </chunk>
<chunk>exhibits weak dependence on </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>, i.e. </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">IM</chunk>
<chunk>. Above </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk> the ordered regime exists, where </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> </chunk>
<inline-float target="i13"/>
<chunk> 1/</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>. Therefore, for </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk> it holds </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(hom)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> and in the random regime one observes </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(hom)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">IM</chunk>
<chunk>.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<float target="f2"/>
<paragraph>
<chunk>The corresponding </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>) dependence is shown in </chunk>
<link target="f3"/>
<chunk>. As expected </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk> monotonously increases on increasing </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>, because the external field tends to increase the degree of ordering. Note that in random samples </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B&#160;=&#160;</chunk>
<chunk>0)&#160;=&#160;0 and the presence of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> gives rise to </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;0.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<float target="f3"/>
<paragraph>
<chunk>In </chunk>
<link target="f4"/>
<chunk> we show the </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>) dependence. For weak enough fields (</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&lt;&lt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk>) one typically observes </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(hom)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;1. Therefore, in random samples we have larger dispersion of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk> values than in homogeneous samples. With the increasing external field both </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk> and </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(hom)</chunk>
<chunk> asymptotically approach towards </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;1. In the latter case the distribution of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk> vales is sharply centered at </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<float target="f4"/>
<paragraph>
<chunk>The crossover field </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk> as a function of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk> is shown in </chunk>
<link target="f5"/>
<chunk>. Indicated lines roughly separate ergodic (</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk>) and nonergodic regimes (</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&lt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk>). With increasing </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk> the degree of frustration within the system increases. Consequently larger values of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> are needed to erase disorders induced memory effects. Note that </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk> is larger in 2D than in 3D systems because in the former case the LC molecules are effectively more constrained by impurities (i.e., in 3D the additional degree of freedom is present).</chunk>
</paragraph>
<float target="f5"/>
</section>
<section>
<title>
<chunk>Conclusions</chunk>
</title>
<paragraph>
<chunk>We have studied the influence of external ordering electric or magnetic field </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> on systems of rod-like objects (e.g. nematic liquid crystals or a dispersion of nano-rods in a liquid environment </chunk>
<link target="b20"/>
<link target="b21"/>
<chunk>) in the presence of random anisotropic type of disorder. We express the interaction energy </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">F</chunk>
<chunk> of the system using the Lebwohl&#8211;Lasher type semi-microscopic description. The orientational order is described in terms of the uniaxial director field exhibiting head-to-tail invariance. We calculate configurations of director fields by minimizing </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">F</chunk>
<chunk> at temperature zero. Therefore, our results are reasonable deep in the nematic phase, where the long range orientational order is observed in absence of random fields. In addition we neglect biaxial states </chunk>
<link target="b27"/>
<link target="b28"/>
<chunk> which might be present in strongly elastically perturbed systems. For a given set of parameters (i.e. concentration </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk> of impurities imposing random anisotropy disorder, disorder anchoring strength </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk>, system dimensionality, history of systems and </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>) we calculate the orientational correlation function </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">G</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk>) of the system. From it we extract the average size of correlated regions and distribution of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk> values measured via the distribution parameter </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m</chunk>
<chunk>.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>Our main interest was to determine the magnetic field regime in which random-field driven memory effects are erased by a strong enough magnetic field. For this purpose we monitored </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk> dependence on </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> for random and homogeneous initial configurations. These states represent two extreme conditions and consequently yield relatively strong memory effects for weak enough values of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>. On increasing </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> values of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m</chunk>
<chunk> are approaching towards </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;1. This signifies that the single peak distribution of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk> values is narrowing. On varying </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> we distinguish between two qualitatively different regimes. The </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">disorded</chunk>
<chunk> regime, where random field effects are apparent, exists below </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk>. In it we find </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(hom)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk>. In the ordered regime </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk> the average length </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk> is dominated by external field </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> and </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">B</chunk>
<inline-float target="i13"/>
<chunk>&#160;1/</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>. The crossover values </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk> are larger in 2D systems, and monotonously increase on increasing </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk>.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>The results of our studies suggest regimes in which memory effects are expected. Our settings well mimic for example mixtures of LCs and aerosil particles </chunk>
<link target="b13"/>
<link target="b14"/>
<link target="b15"/>
<chunk> or LCs confined to porous matrices </chunk>
<link target="b10"/>
<link target="b11"/>
<link target="b12"/>
<chunk>, or randomly perturbed nanotubes in a liquid environment </chunk>
<link target="b20"/>
<link target="b21"/>
<chunk>. Our results might be of use for electro-optic applications, where switching between different optical states (i.e. global orientational ordering) is achieved via external electric or magnetic fields in advanced soft nano-composites or soft hybrid systems.</chunk>
</paragraph>
</section>
<section>
<title>
<chunk>Numerical approach</chunk>
</title>
<paragraph>
<chunk>The system consists of a lattice of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">N</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">0</chunk>
<chunk> &#215; </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">N</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">0</chunk>
<chunk> &#215; </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">N</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">0</chunk>
<chunk> sites with unit directors</chunk>
</paragraph>
<float target="e6"/>
<paragraph>
<chunk>In 2D we set </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">S</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">Z</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;0. We express the total interaction energy functional as the sum over all sites </chunk>
<inline-float target="i7"/>
<chunk> where the term </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">F</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes" subscript="yes">ijk</chunk>
<chunk> consists of three parts:</chunk>
</paragraph>
<float target="e7"/>
<paragraph>
<chunk italic="yes">J</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;1. The indices </chunk>
<inline-float target="i8"/>
<chunk> run over the first neighbors of the point described by the indices </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">I</chunk>
<chunk>, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">j</chunk>
<chunk>, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">k</chunk>
<chunk>. With respect to denotation of indices in </chunk>
<link target="e1"/>
<chunk> these sets of indices correspond to </chunk>
<chunk>&#945;&#160;=&#160;</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">I,j,k</chunk>
<chunk>) and </chunk>
<inline-float target="i9"/>
<chunk>. The parameter </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes" subscript="yes">ijk</chunk>
<chunk> has the value either 1 or 0, while the orientation of the unit vector </chunk>
<chunk bold="yes" italic="yes">e</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes" subscript="yes">ijk</chunk>
<chunk> is random spatially distributed, we set these by random-number generator.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>The equilibrium director configuration is obtained by minimizing the total interaction energy with respect to all the directors by taking into account the normalization condition </chunk>
<inline-float target="i10"/>
<chunk>. The resulting potential to be minimized reads </chunk>
<inline-float target="i11"/>
<chunk>, where</chunk>
</paragraph>
<float target="e8"/>
<paragraph>
<chunk>and </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#955;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes" subscript="yes">ijk</chunk>
<chunk> are Lagrange multipliers. We minimize the potential </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">F</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">*</chunk>
<chunk> and obtain the following set of </chunk>
<inline-float target="i12"/>
<chunk>equations which are solved numerically:</chunk>
</paragraph>
<float target="e9"/>
<paragraph>
<chunk>where the vector function </chunk>
<chunk bold="yes" italic="yes">g</chunk>
<chunk> is defined as</chunk>
</paragraph>
<float target="e10"/>
<paragraph>
<chunk>The system of </chunk>
<link target="e9"/>
<chunk> is solved by overrelaxation method which has been proved fast and reliable. At cell boundaries we impose the periodic boundary conditions.</chunk>
</paragraph>
</section>
<album-graphics>
<graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-graphical-abstract"/>
</album-graphics>
<inline-graphics>
<graphic id="i1" public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i11"/>
<graphic id="i2" public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i12"/>
<graphic id="i3" public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i13"/>
<graphic id="i4" public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i14"/>
<graphic id="i5" public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i15"/>
<graphic id="i6" public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i16"/>
<graphic id="i7" public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i17"/>
<graphic id="i8" public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i18"/>
<graphic id="i9" public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i19"/>
<graphic id="i10" public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i20"/>
<graphic id="i11" public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i21"/>
<graphic id="i12" public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i22"/>
<graphic id="i13" public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i23"/>
</inline-graphics>
<figures>
<figure id="f1">
<caption>
<paragraph>
<chunk>The orientational correlation function as a function of separation </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk> between LC molecules for (a) 2D and (b) 3D systems. In random samples </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">G</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk>) vanishes for large enough values of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk> for </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;0 while in homogeneous samples it could saturate at a finite plateau </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk> (if </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk> or </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk> are low enough). For </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;0 a finite plateau can be observed also in random samples. (a) </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;0.3, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;2.5, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">N</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">0</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;260; (b)&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;0.3, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;2.5, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">N</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">0</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;100. At </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;1 the first neighbors are placed in the cubic cell. The legend is shown in&#160;(a).</chunk>
</paragraph>
</caption>
<graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-1"/>
</figure>
<figure id="f2">
<caption>
<paragraph>
<chunk>Correlation length </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk> as a function of 1/</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> for homogeneous and random samples for three different concentrations of impurities in (a) 2D and (b) 3D. The </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>) dependence displays a crossover between the disordered and ordered regime. The disordered regimes extends at (</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&lt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk>), where </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(hom)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk>. In the ordered regime (</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk>) one observes </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(hom)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">&#958;</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>. (a) </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;2.5, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">N</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">0</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;260; (b) </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;2.5, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">N</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">0</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;100. The legend is shown in&#160;(a).</chunk>
</paragraph>
</caption>
<graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-2"/>
</figure>
<figure id="f3">
<caption>
<paragraph>
<chunk>The </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>) dependence for homogeneous and random samples for two different </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk> in (a) 2D and (b) 3D. For </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;0) we obtain </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;0. In the disordered regime it holds </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(hom)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk> and </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(hom)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">s</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk> in the ordered regime. (a) </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;2.5, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">N</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">0</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;260; (b) </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;2.5, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">N</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">0</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;100. The legend is shown in&#160;(a).</chunk>
</paragraph>
</caption>
<graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-3"/>
</figure>
<figure id="f4">
<caption>
<paragraph>
<chunk>The </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m</chunk>
<chunk>(</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>) dependence </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">r</chunk>
<chunk> homogeneous and random samples for two different </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk> in (a) 2D and (b) 3D. In the disordered regime it holds </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(hom)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;1. In the ordered regime we obtain </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(ran)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&#8776;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">m</chunk>
<chunk superscript="yes">(hom)</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;1 which asymptotically approach one on increasing </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>. (a) </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;2.5, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">N</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">0</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;260; (b)&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;2.5, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">N</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">0</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;100. The legend is shown in&#160;(a).</chunk>
</paragraph>
</caption>
<graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-4"/>
</figure>
<figure id="f5">
<caption>
<paragraph>
<chunk>The crossover field </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk> on varying </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk>. Indicated lines roughly separate ergodic (</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&gt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk>) and nonergodic regimes (</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;&lt;&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">c</chunk>
<chunk>). With increasing </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">p</chunk>
<chunk> one the degree of frustration within the system increases. Consequently larger values of </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">B</chunk>
<chunk> are needed to erase disorder induced memory effects. The points are calculated and the lines serve as guides for the eye. (a) </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;2.5, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">N</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">0</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;260; (b)&#160;</chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">W</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;2.5, </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">N</chunk>
<chunk subscript="yes">0</chunk>
<chunk>&#160;=&#160;100.</chunk>
</paragraph>
</caption>
<graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-5"/>
</figure>
</figures>
<equations>
<equation id="e1">
<graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i1"/>
</equation>
<equation id="e2">
<graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i2"/>
</equation>
<equation id="e3">
<graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i3"/>
</equation>
<equation id="e4">
<graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i4"/>
</equation>
<equation id="e5">
<graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i5"/>
</equation>
<equation id="e6">
<graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i6"/>
</equation>
<equation id="e7">
<graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i7"/>
</equation>
<equation id="e8">
<graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i8"/>
</equation>
<equation id="e9">
<graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i9"/>
</equation>
<equation id="e10">
<graphic public-id="1860-5397-6-2-i10"/>
</equation>
</equations>
<end-section>
<title>
<chunk>Acknowledgements</chunk>
</title>
<paragraph>
<chunk>Matej Cvetko acknowledges support of the EU European Social Fund. Operation is performed within the Operative program for development of human resources for the period 2007-2013.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>Milan Ambro&#382;i&#269; and Samo Kralj acknowledge support from the Slovenian Research Agency (Grant J1-0155).</chunk>
</paragraph>
</end-section>
<reference id="b1" type="in-book" publisher-name="Oxford University Press" publisher-location="London">
<reference-editor first-name="G" middle-names="P" last-name="Crawford"/>
<reference-editor first-name="S" last-name="&#381;umer"/>
<source>
<chunk>Liquid Crystals in Complex Geometries Formed by Polymer and Porous Network</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="1996"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b2" type="article" volume="154" first-page="381">
<reference-author first-name="M" middle-names="V" last-name="Kurik"/>
<reference-author first-name="O" middle-names="D" last-name="Lavrentovich"/>
<source>
<chunk>Usp. Fiz. Nauk</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="1988"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b3" type="article" volume="79" first-page="4214" last-page="4217">
<reference-author first-name="L" last-name="Radzihovsky"/>
<reference-author first-name="J" last-name="Toner"/>
<source>
<chunk>Phys. Rev. Lett.</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="1997"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.4214"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b4" type="article" volume="84" first-page="4886" last-page="4889">
<reference-author first-name="D" middle-names="E" last-name="Feldman"/>
<source>
<chunk>Phys. Rev. Lett.</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="2000"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4886"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b5" type="article" volume="264" first-page="91" last-page="99">
<reference-author first-name="V" last-name="Popa-Nita"/>
<reference-author first-name="S" last-name="Romano"/>
<source>
<chunk>Chem. Phys.</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="2001"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1016/S0301-0104(00)00340-2"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b6" type="in-book" first-page="467" last-page="481" publisher-name="Oxford University Press" publisher-location="London">
<reference-author first-name="D" middle-names="J" last-name="Cleaver"/>
<reference-author first-name="S" last-name="Kralj"/>
<reference-author first-name="T" middle-names="J" last-name="Sluckin"/>
<reference-author first-name="M" middle-names="P" last-name="Allen"/>
<reference-editor first-name="G" middle-names="P" last-name="Crawford"/>
<reference-editor first-name="S" last-name="&#381;umer"/>
<title>
<chunk>The random anisotropy nematic spin model</chunk>
</title>
<source>
<chunk>Liquid Crystals in Complex Geometries Formed by Polymer and Porous Networks</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="1996"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b7" type="book" publisher-name="Springer-Verlag" publisher-location="Berlin">
<reference-author first-name="M" last-name="Kleman"/>
<reference-author first-name="O" middle-names="D" last-name="Lavrentovich"/>
<source>
<chunk>Soft Matter Physics</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="2002"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b8" type="article" volume="68" first-page="70" last-page="68">
<reference-author first-name="F" middle-names="M" last-name="Aliev"/>
<reference-author first-name="M" middle-names="N" last-name="Breganov"/>
<source>
<chunk>Sov. Phys. JETP</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="1989"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b9" type="article" volume="72" first-page="2725" last-page="2729">
<reference-author first-name="S" last-name="Tripathi"/>
<reference-author first-name="C" last-name="Rosenblatt"/>
<reference-author first-name="F" middle-names="M" last-name="Aliev"/>
<source>
<chunk>Phys. Rev. Lett.</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="1994"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2725"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b10" type="article" volume="69" first-page="788" last-page="791">
<reference-author first-name="T" last-name="Bellini"/>
<reference-author first-name="N" middle-names="A" last-name="Clark"/>
<reference-author first-name="C" middle-names="D" last-name="Muzny"/>
<reference-author first-name="L" last-name="Wu"/>
<reference-author first-name="C" middle-names="W" last-name="Garland"/>
<reference-author first-name="D" middle-names="W" last-name="Schaefer"/>
<reference-author first-name="B" middle-names="J" last-name="Oliver"/>
<source>
<chunk>Phys. Rev. Lett.</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="1992"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.788"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b11" type="article" volume="53" first-page="3629" last-page="3638">
<reference-author first-name="S" last-name="Kralj"/>
<reference-author first-name="A" last-name="Zidan&#353;ek"/>
<reference-author first-name="G" last-name="Lahajnar"/>
<reference-author first-name="I" last-name="Mu&#353;evi&#269;"/>
<reference-author first-name="S" last-name="&#381;umer"/>
<reference-author first-name="R" last-name="Blinc"/>
<reference-author first-name="M" middle-names="M" last-name="Pintar"/>
<source>
<chunk>Phys. Rev. E</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="1996"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1103/PhysRevE.53.3629"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b12" type="article" volume="68" article-number="021705">
<reference-author first-name="Z" last-name="Kutnjak"/>
<reference-author first-name="S" last-name="Kralj"/>
<reference-author first-name="G" last-name="Lahajnar"/>
<reference-author first-name="S" last-name="&#381;umer"/>
<source>
<chunk>Phys. Rev. E</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="2003"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1103/PhysRevE.68.021705"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b13" type="article" volume="72" article-number="051710">
<reference-author first-name="G" last-name="Sinha"/>
<reference-author first-name="J" last-name="Leys"/>
<reference-author first-name="C" last-name="Glorieux"/>
<reference-author first-name="J" last-name="Thoen"/>
<source>
<chunk>Phys. Rev. E</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="2005"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1103/PhysRevE.72.051710"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b14" type="article" volume="85" first-page="1008" last-page="1011">
<reference-author first-name="T" last-name="Bellini"/>
<reference-author first-name="M" last-name="Buscaglia"/>
<reference-author first-name="C" last-name="Chiccoli"/>
<reference-author first-name="F" last-name="Mantegazza"/>
<reference-author first-name="P" last-name="Pasini"/>
<reference-author first-name="C" last-name="Zannoni"/>
<source>
<chunk>Phys. Rev. Lett.</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="2000"/>
<comment>
<paragraph>
<chunk>and references therein</chunk>
</paragraph>
</comment>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1008"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b15" type="article" volume="73" article-number="031707">
<reference-author first-name="G" last-name="Cordoyiannis"/>
<reference-author first-name="S" last-name="Kralj"/>
<reference-author first-name="G" last-name="Nounesis"/>
<reference-author first-name="S" last-name="&#381;umer"/>
<reference-author first-name="Z" last-name="Kutnjak"/>
<source>
<chunk>Phys. Rev. E</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="2006"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1103/PhysRevE.73.031707"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b16" type="article" volume="58" first-page="5966" last-page="5981">
<reference-author first-name="G" middle-names="S" last-name="Iannacchione"/>
<reference-author first-name="C" middle-names="W" last-name="Garland"/>
<reference-author first-name="J" middle-names="T" last-name="Mang"/>
<reference-author first-name="T" middle-names="P" last-name="Rieker"/>
<source>
<chunk>Phys. Rev. E</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="1998"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1103/PhysRevE.58.5966"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b17" type="article" volume="12" first-page="83" last-page="90">
<reference-author first-name="V" last-name="Popa-Nita"/>
<source>
<chunk>Eur. Phys. J. B</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="1999"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1007/s100510050981"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b18" type="article" volume="246" first-page="247" last-page="253">
<reference-author first-name="V" last-name="Popa-Nita"/>
<source>
<chunk>Chem. Phys.</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="1999"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1016/S0301-0104(99)00184-6"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b19" type="article" in-press="yes">
<reference-author first-name="M" last-name="Cvetko"/>
<reference-author first-name="M" last-name="Krasna"/>
<reference-author first-name="M" last-name="Ambro&#382;i&#269;"/>
<reference-author first-name="Z" last-name="Kutnjak"/>
<reference-author first-name="S" last-name="Kralj"/>
<comment>
<paragraph>
<chunk>in preparation</chunk>
</paragraph>
</comment>
</reference>
<reference id="b20" type="article" volume="97" article-number="044309">
<reference-author first-name="I" last-name="Dierking"/>
<reference-author first-name="G" last-name="Scalia"/>
<reference-author first-name="P" last-name="Morales"/>
<source>
<chunk>J. Appl. Phys.</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="2005"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1063/1.1850606"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b21" type="article" volume="19" first-page="359" last-page="364">
<reference-author first-name="J" last-name="Lagerwall"/>
<reference-author first-name="G" last-name="Scalia"/>
<reference-author first-name="M" last-name="Haluska"/>
<reference-author first-name="U" last-name="Dettlaff-Weglikowska"/>
<reference-author first-name="S" last-name="Roth"/>
<reference-author first-name="F" last-name="Giesselmann"/>
<source>
<chunk>Adv. Mater.</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="2007"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1002/adma.200600889"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b22" type="article" volume="6" first-page="426" last-page="429">
<reference-author first-name="P" middle-names="A" last-name="Lebwohl"/>
<reference-author first-name="G" last-name="Lasher"/>
<source>
<chunk>Phys. Rev. A</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="1972"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1103/PhysRevA.6.426"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b23" type="article" volume="16" first-page="2901" last-page="2915">
<reference-author first-name="S" last-name="Romano"/>
<source>
<chunk>Int. J. Mod. Phys. B</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="2002"/>
<comment>
<paragraph>
<chunk>and references therein</chunk>
</paragraph>
</comment>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1142/S0217979202009986"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b24" type="article" volume="31" first-page="160" last-page="162">
<reference-author first-name="R" last-name="Harris"/>
<reference-author first-name="M" last-name="Plischke"/>
<reference-author first-name="M" middle-names="J" last-name="Zuckerman"/>
<source>
<chunk>Phys. Rev. Lett.</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="1973"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1103/PhysRevLett.31.160"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b25" type="article" volume="36" first-page="33" last-page="41">
<reference-author first-name="M" last-name="Cvetko"/>
<reference-author first-name="M" last-name="Ambro&#382;i&#269;"/>
<reference-author first-name="S" last-name="Kralj"/>
<source>
<chunk>Liq. Cryst.</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="2009"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1080/02678290802638431"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b26" type="article" volume="35" first-page="1399" last-page="1401">
<reference-author first-name="Y" last-name="Imry"/>
<reference-author first-name="S" last-name="Ma"/>
<source>
<chunk>Phys. Rev. Lett.</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="1975"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.1399"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b27" type="article" volume="78" article-number="051702">
<reference-author first-name="C" last-name="Cruz"/>
<reference-author first-name="J" middle-names="L" last-name="Figueirinhas"/>
<reference-author first-name="D" last-name="Filip"/>
<reference-author first-name="G" last-name="Feio"/>
<reference-author first-name="A" middle-names="C" last-name="Ribeiro"/>
<reference-author first-name="Y" last-name="Frere"/>
<reference-author first-name="T" last-name="Meyer"/>
<reference-author first-name="G" middle-names="H" last-name="Mehl"/>
<source>
<chunk>Phys. Rev. E</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="2008"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1103/PhysRevE.78.051702"/>
</reference>
<reference id="b28" type="article" volume="20" first-page="193" last-page="218">
<reference-author first-name="M" last-name="Ambro&#382;i&#269;"/>
<reference-author first-name="F" last-name="Bisi"/>
<reference-author first-name="E" middle-names="G" last-name="Virga"/>
<source>
<chunk>Continuum Mech. Thermodyn.</chunk>
</source>
<publication-date year="2008"/>
<external-link type="doi" public-id="10.1007/s00161-008-0077-x"/>
</reference>
<copyright year="2010" holder="Cvetko et al; licensee Beilstein-Institut." link="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0">
<paragraph>
<chunk>This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</chunk>
</paragraph>
<paragraph>
<chunk>The license is subject to the </chunk>
<chunk italic="yes">Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry</chunk>
<chunk> terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)</chunk>
</paragraph>
</copyright>
</article>

