Palladium-catalyzed 2,5-diheteroarylation of 2,5-dibromothiophene derivatives

  1. 1,2 ,
  2. 2 ,
  3. 1 ,
  4. 1,2 and
  5. 1
1Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes, UMR 6226 CNRS-Université de Rennes, "Organométalliques: Matériaux et Catalyse", Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes, France, Tel.: 00-33-2-23-23-63-84, Fax 00-33-2-23-23-69-39
2Département de chimie, Tizi Ouzou University, BP 17 RP 15000 Tizi-Ouzou, Algeria
  1. Corresponding author email
Associate Editor: C. Stephenson
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 2912–2919. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.10.309
Received 13 Oct 2014, Accepted 27 Nov 2014, Published 09 Dec 2014
Full Research Paper
cc by logo

Abstract

Conditions allowing the one pot 2,5-diheteroarylation of 2,5-dibromothiophene derivatives in the presence of palladium catalysts are reported. Using KOAc as the base, DMA as the solvent and only 0.5–2 mol % palladium catalysts, the target 2,5-diheteroarylated thiophenes were obtained in moderate to good yields and with a wide variety of heteroarenes such as thiazoles, thiophenes, furans, pyrroles, pyrazoles or isoxazoles. Moreover, sequential heteroarylation reactions allow the access to 2,5-diheteroarylated thiophenes bearing two different heteroaryl units.

Introduction

2,2':5',2"-Terthiophene (or 2,5-di(2-thienyl)thiophene) (Figure 1) and many of its derivatives are important structures due to their biological and/or physical properties. For example, 2,2':5',2"-terthiophene itself is a pigment of Tagetes minuta. Some 2,2':5',2"-terthiophene derivatives such as 5,5''-dichloro-α-terthiophene also occur naturally [1]. Moreover, terthiophenes are widely used as building blocks for the synthesis of semiconductors [2]. Due to these multiple uses, the discovery of a simpler access to terthiophene derivatives would be very useful.

[1860-5397-10-309-1]

Figure 1: 2,2':5',2"-Terthiophene.

Suzuki, Stille or Negishi Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions represent some of the most efficient methods for the preparation of 2,5-diheteroarylated thiophenes [3-16]. However, an organometallic derivative must be prepared to perform such reactions. In 1990, Ohta and co-workers reported the Pd-catalyzed direct arylation of heteroaromatics using aryl halides as coupling partners via a C–H bond activation [17,18]. Since then Pd-catalyzed direct arylation of heteroaryls, especially with aryl halides as coupling partners, has been shown to be a very powerful method for an easier and greener access to a very broad range of arylated heterocycles [19-32]. This method is more attractive than other Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions as it avoids the preparation of an organometallic derivative and also as the major byproducts of the reaction are not metallic salts but a base associated to HX.

The metal-catalyzed direct arylation of a wide variety of heteroarenes using aryl halides as coupling partners has been reported in recent years [19-36]. However, to our knowledge, only a few examples of Pd-catalyzed direct arylations at both C2 and C5 carbons of 2,5-dihalothiophene derivatives have been described. In 2006, Borgese et al. reported the Pd-catalyzed coupling of 2,5-dibromothiophene with 3-methoxythiophene to afford the corresponding terthiophene in 29% yield [37]. From 2,5-diiodothiophene and benzoxazole, using 5 mol % Pd(phen)2(PF6)2 catalyst, the 2,5-diheteroarylated thiophene was obtained in 89% yield by Murai et al. [38]. A fluorescent π-conjugate thiophene derivative bearing spiro[fluorene-9,4’-[4H]indeno[1,2-b]furan] substituents at C2 and C5 has been prepared in 46% yield by this reaction using Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %) associated to PPh3 (10 mol %) as catalytic system [39]. A pyrrole derivative was coupled with 2,5-dibromothiophene in the presence of Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %) and PCy3 (10 mol %) catalyst to afford the 2,5-di(pyrrolyl)thiophene in 59% yield [40]. Finally, an indolizine was also successfully coupled with 2,5-dibromothiophene in 47% yield in the presence of Pd(OAc)2 as catalyst [41]. To our knowledge, so far sequential Pd-catalyzed direct couplings using 2,5-dihalothiophene derivatives have not been described. Therefore, the discovery of effective general conditions, for the direct coupling of heteroarenes at both C2 and C5 positions of 2,5-dihalothiophene derivatives, would constitute a considerable advantage allowing a simpler access to terthiophene derivatives.

Here, we wish to report (i) that only 0.5–2 mol % of air-stable palladium catalysts associated to KOAc promote the direct access to 2,5-diheteroarylated thiophenes in one pot, (ii) on the reaction scope using a large set of heteroarenes, and (iii) conditions allowing the sequential diheteroarylation of 2,5-dibromothiophene.

Results and Discussion

Based on our previous results, DMA was initially chosen as the solvent and KOAc as the base for this study [42,43]. The reactions were conducted at 140 °C under inert conditions using PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) or Pd(OAc)2 catalysts. Using only 0.5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, the reaction of 1 equiv of 2,5-dibromothiophene with 2 equiv 2-ethyl-4-methylthiazole as coupling partners affords the mono- and diarylation products 1a and 1b in a 2:98 ratio and the desired product 1b was isolated in 79% yield (Scheme 1, Table 1, entry 1). The use of 3 equiv of 2-ethyl-4-methylthiazole afforded 1b in similar yield (Table 1, entry 2). Then, we examined the influence of the amount of catalyst and other parameters on the reaction. The use of 1 or 2 mol % PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) catalyst, which had been previously found to be very effective to promote the direct arylation of several hereroaromatics [42-44], also afforded 1b in high yields (Table 1, entries 3–5). Even at 100 °C, the desired product 1b was obtained in 78% yield (Table 1, entry 6). When CsOAc was employed as the base instead of KOAc, in the presence of 2 mol % PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) catalyst, 1b was isolated in 80% yield, whereas NaOAc led to target product 1b in only 68% yield and Cs2CO3 was ineffective (Table 1, entries 7–9). It should be noted that in the presence of an excess of 2,5-dibromothiophene (4 equiv) with 1 equiv of 2-ethyl-4-methylthiazole the products 1a and 1b were produced in a 72:28 ratio and 1a was isolated in 52% yield, without cleavage of the second C–Br bond on the thiophene ring allowing sequential arylations (Table 1, entry 10).

[1860-5397-10-309-i1]

Scheme 1: Palladium-catalyzed direct arylation using 2,5-dibromothiophene and 2-ethyl-4-methylthiazole as coupling partners.

Table 1: Influence of the reaction conditions for palladium-catalyzed direct arylation using 2,5-dibromothiophene and 2-ethyl-4-methylthiazole as coupling partners (Scheme 1).a

Entry Catalyst (mol %) Base 2-Ethyl-4-methylthiazole (equiv) Temperature (°C) Ratio 1a:1b Yield in 1b (%)
1 Pd(OAc)2 (0.5) KOAc 2 140 2:98 79
2 Pd(OAc)2 (0.5) KOAc 3 140 1:99 80
3 PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) (2) KOAc 3 140 0:100 81
4 PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) (1) KOAc 3 140 0:100 80
5 PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) (2) KOAc 2.2 140 1:99 78
6 PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) (2) KOAc 3 100 0:100 78
7 PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) (2) NaOAc 3 140 7:93 68
8 PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) (2) CsOAc 3 140 0:100 80
9 PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) (2) Cs2CO3 3 140 nd <5
10 PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) (2) KOAc 3 140 72:28 52b

aConditions: 2,5-dibromothiophene (1 equiv), base (3 equiv), DMA, 20 h, isolated yields. b2,5-Dibromothiophene (4 equiv), 2-ethyl-4-methylthiazole (1 equiv), yield in 1a.

Then, with the most effective reaction conditions in hand for diheteroarylation (DMA, KOAc, Pd(OAc)2 or PdCl(C3H5)(dppb), 100 or 140 °C, 20 h), we explored the scope of this reaction using a variety of heteroarenes as the coupling partner (Scheme 2).

[1860-5397-10-309-i2]

Scheme 2: Reactivity of 2,5-dibromothiophene with different heteroarenes.

First, we investigated the reaction of 2,5-dibromothiophene with 4-methylthiazole (Scheme 2). The reaction proceeded very smoothly to afford the product 2 in 82% yield. It should be noted that no arylation at C2 of this thiazole derivative was observed. Then, a set of thiophene derivatives was employed. Both, 2-methyl- and 2-chlorothiophenes afforded the desired products 3 and 4 in good yields in the presence of PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) as the catalyst. Yields of 62% and 73% of these two products were obtained using 0.5 mol % Pd(OAc)2 catalyst at 140 °C, whereas a reaction performed at 100 °C led to only a partial conversion of 2,5-dibromothiophene to afford 3 in 45% yield. This slightly lower reactivity of thiophene derivatives under these conditions was expected, as they are known to be less reactive than thiazole derivatives [44]. Moderate yields for 5 and 6 were obtained starting form thiophene-2-carbonitrile and ethyl thiophene-2-carboxylate, respectively in the presence of 2 mol % PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) catalyst due to the formation of unidentified degradation products. The use of 6 equiv of thiophene allowed the formation of 2,2':5',2"-terthiophene (7) in 85% yield. The reactivity of three furan derivatives was also studied using PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) as the catalyst. From 2-n-butylfuran, 8 was obtained in 79% yield, whereas 2-acetylfuran and methyl 2-methylfuran-3-carboxylate afforded 9 and 10 in 60% and 63% yield, respectively. The reaction of 1 equiv of 2,5-dibromothiophene with 5 equiv of 1-methylpyrrole gave 11 in 78% yield. No significant formation of other polyheterocycles was observed by GC–MS analysis of the crude mixture. Arylation at C4 of 3,5-dimethylisoxazole and 5-chloro-1,3-dimethylpyrazole afforded 12 and 13 in 80% and 83% yields, respectively. With 3,5-dimethylisoxazole, a reaction performed using only 0.5 mol% Pd(OAc)2 catalyst at 100 °C led to a partial conversion of 2,5-dibromothiophene.

As several terthiophene derivatives bearing alkyl substituents at C3 in their central unit have been employed in material chemistry [2], the reactivity of 2,5-dibromo-3-methylthiophene was also examined (Scheme 3). Similar results to those of 2,5-dibromothiophene were obtained. Both, 2-ethyl-4-methylthiazole and 4-methylthiazole reacted nicely to afford 14 and 15 in 83% and 80% yields, respectively. The four terthiophenes 1619 were also obtained in satisfactory yields. Again a moderate yield in 20 was obtained in the presence of methyl 2-methylfuran-3-carboxylate due to the formation of degradation products, whereas the reaction with 1-methylpyrrole and 3,5-dimethylisoxazole resulted in good yields of 21 and 22, respectively.

[1860-5397-10-309-i3]

Scheme 3: Reactivity of 2,5-dibromo-3-methylthiophene with different heteroarenes.

To our knowledge, the sequential Pd-catalyzed direct diheteroarylation of 2,5-dibromothiophene has not yet been reported. A sequential heteroarylation would allow the synthesis of non-symmetrically 2,5-disubstituted thiophene derivatives. Our attempts to prepare these compounds are shown in Scheme 4. Eight heteroarenes were reacted with 1a to afford the 2,5-diheteroarylated thiophenes 2330 in 41–89% yield. A high yield of 89% for 23 was obtained from 1a and 2-isobutylthiazole as the coupling partners. The reactions with 2-methylthiophene and thiophene-2-carbonitrile also afforded the desired products 24 and 25 in good yields. A decreased yield of 41% for 26 was obtained with thiophene as coupling partner, whereas, 1-methylpyrrole gave 27 in 74%. Coupling of 1a with methyl 2-methylfuran-3-carboxylate afforded 28 in 62% yield. The arylation at C4 of 3,5-dimethylisoxazole and 5-chloro-1,3-dimethylpyrazole also proceeded nicely to give 29 and 30 in 66% and 72% yield, respectively.

[1860-5397-10-309-i4]

Scheme 4: Sequential diheteroarylation of 2,5-dibromothiophene.

It should be noted that, for the synthesis of 24, the introduction of the thiazole unit in the first step (Scheme 1 and Scheme 4, 36% over 2 steps) led to a slightly higher yield than the introduction of 2-methylthiophene followed by the coupling with 2-ethyl-4-methylthiazole (Scheme 5, 32% yield over 2 steps).

[1860-5397-10-309-i5]

Scheme 5: Sequential diheteroarylation of 2,5-dibromothiophene.

We also compared the preparation of 2,2':5',2"-terthiophene (7) starting from either 2,5-dibromothiophene (Scheme 2) or from 2-bromothiophene (Scheme 6). The reaction of 1 equiv thiophene with 2 equiv of 2-bromothiophene resulted in a poor yield for 7 due to the formation of a mixture of bithiophene 32, terthiophene 7 and also a quaterthiophene (as was observed by GC–MS analysis of the crude mixture). On the other hand, the use of 6 equiv of thiophene in the presence of 1 equiv of 2-bromothiophene afforded 7 and 32 in a 30:70 ratio and only low amounts of a quaterthiophene were observed; compound 32 was isolated in 58% yield (Scheme 6, middle). The same reaction conditions allowed to prepare 1-methyl-2-(thiophen-2-yl)pyrrole (33) in 61% yield (Scheme 6, bottom).

[1860-5397-10-309-i6]

Scheme 6: Heteroarylation of 2-bromothiophene.

Finally, as 4,7-diarylbenzothiadiazoles also display important physical properties [45], we applied our procedure to 4,7-dibromobenzothiadiazole which is commercially available (Scheme 7). In all cases, the desired 4,7-diarylbenzothiadiazoles 3438 were obtained in high yields.

[1860-5397-10-309-i7]

Scheme 7: Reactivity of 4,7-dibromobenzothiadiazole.

Conclusion

In summary we report here a simple one-pot catalytic method leading to 2,5-diheteroarylated thiophenes in good yields. We established that 2 mol % of air-stable PdCl(C3H5)(dppb) catalyst (and in some cases 0.5 mol % Pd(OAc)2 catalyst) in the presence of KOAc as the base promotes the 2,5-diheteroarylation of 2,5-dibromothiophene in the presence of a variety of heteroarenes such as thiophenes, furans, pyrroles, pyrazoles or isoxazoles as the coupling partners. The sequential diheteroarylation of 2,5-dibromothiophene was also found to be possible to afford 2,5-diheteroarylated thiophenes bearing two different heteroarene units. As both, 2,5-dibromothiophene and a wide variety of heteroarenes are commercially available, this method gives a convenient access to a large number of terthiophene derivatives.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Experimental procedures and characterization data.
Format: PDF Size: 345.8 KB Download

Acknowledgements

We thank the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, “Rennes Metropole” for providing financial support.

References

  1. Liu, Y.; Ye, M.; Guo, H.-Z.; Zhao, Y.-Y.; Guo, D.-A. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2002, 4, 175–178. doi:10.1080/1028602021000000071
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Gohier, F.; Frère, P.; Roncali, J. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 1497–1503. doi:10.1021/jo302571u
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  3. Li, J. J.; Gribble, G. W. Palladium in Heterocyclic Chemistry; Pergamon: Amsterdam, 2000.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Negishi, E., Ed. Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis; Part III; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 2002; p 213.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Schnürch, M.; Flasik, R.; Khan, A. F.; Spina, M.; Mihovilovic, M. D.; Stanetty, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 3283–3307. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200600089
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Tung, D. T.; Tuân, D. T.; Rasool, N.; Villinger, A.; Reinke, H.; Fischer, C.; Langer, P. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 1595–1609. doi:10.1002/adsc.200900044
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Pernites, R. B.; Ponnapati, R. R.; Advincula, R. C. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3207–3213. doi:10.1002/adma.201100469
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Zhou, J.; Xie, S.; Amond, E. F.; Becker, M. L. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 3391–3394. doi:10.1021/ma400531v
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Qian, D.; Ma, W.; Li, Z.; Guo, X.; Zhang, S.; Ye, L.; Ade, H.; Tan, Z.; Hou, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 8464–8467. doi:10.1021/ja402971d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Tanaka, S.; Tanaka, D.; Tatsuta, G.; Murakami, K.; Tamba, S.; Sugie, A.; Mori, A. Chem. – Eur. J. 2013, 19, 1658–1665. doi:10.1002/chem.201203331
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Nagura, K.; Saito, S.; Yusa, H.; Yamawaki, H.; Fujihisa, H.; Sato, H.; Shimoikeda, Y.; Yamaguchi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10322–10325. doi:10.1021/ja4055228
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Klingstedt, T.; Shirani, H.; Åslund, K. O. A.; Cairns, N. J.; Sigurdson, C. J.; Goedert, M.; Nilsson, K. P. R. Chem. – Eur. J. 2013, 19, 10179–10192. doi:10.1002/chem.201301463
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Mallet, C.; Didane, Y.; Watanabe, T.; Yoshimoto, N.; Allain, M.; Videlot-Ackermann, C.; Frère, P. ChemPlusChem 2013, 78, 459–466. doi:10.1002/cplu.201300037
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Bruns, C. J.; Herman, D. J.; Minuzzo, J. B.; Lehrman, J. A.; Stupp, S. I. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 4330–4339. doi:10.1021/cm402505p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Salamoun, J.; Anderson, S.; Burnett, J. C.; Gussio, R.; Wipf, P. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 2034–2037. doi:10.1021/ol500620m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Ferrer Flegeau, E.; Popkin, M. E.; Greaney, M. F. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3303–3306. doi:10.1021/jo800121y
    See for access to trisoxazoles.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Ohta, A.; Akita, Y.; Ohkuwa, T.; Chiba, M.; Fukunaga, R.; Miyafuji, A.; Nakata, T.; Tani, N.; Aoyagi, Y. Heterocycles 1990, 31, 1951–1958. doi:10.3987/COM-90-5467
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Aoyagi, Y.; Inoue, A.; Koizumi, I.; Hashimoto, R.; Tokunaga, K.; Gohma, K.; Komatsu, J.; Sekine, K.; Miyafuji, A.; Kunoh, J.; Honma, R.; Akita, Y.; Ohta, A. Heterocycles 1992, 33, 257–272. doi:10.3987/COM-91-S29
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Alberico, D.; Scott, M. E.; Lautens, M. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 174–238. doi:10.1021/cr0509760
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  20. Satoh, T.; Miura, M. Chem. Lett. 2007, 36, 200–205. doi:10.1246/cl.2007.200
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  21. Li, B.-J.; Yang, S.-D.; Shi, Z.-J. Synlett 2008, 949–957. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1042907
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  22. Bellina, F.; Rossi, R. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 10269–10310. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2009.10.015
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  23. Ackermann, L.; Vincente, R.; Kapdi, A. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9792–9826. doi:10.1002/anie.200902996
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  24. Roger, J.; Gottumukkala, A. L.; Doucet, H. ChemCatChem 2010, 2, 20–40. doi:10.1002/cctc.200900074
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  25. Wu, X.-F.; Anbarasan, P.; Neumann, H.; Beller, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7316–7319. doi:10.1002/anie.201003895
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  26. Kuhl, N.; Hopkinson, M. N.; Wencel-Delord, J.; Glorius, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10236–10254. doi:10.1002/anie.201203269
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  27. Yamaguchi, J.; Yamaguchi, A. D.; Itami, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8960–9009. doi:10.1002/anie.201201666
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  28. Wencel-Delord, J.; Glorius, F. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 369–375. doi:10.1038/nchem.1607
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  29. Kuzhushkov, S. I.; Potukuchi, H. K.; Ackermann, L. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 562–571. doi:10.1039/c2cy20505j
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  30. Yuan, K.; Doucet, H. ChemCatChem 2013, 5, 3495–3496. doi:10.1002/cctc.201300533
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  31. Rossi, R.; Bellina, F.; Lessi, M.; Manzini, C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 17–117. doi:10.1002/adsc.201300922
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  32. He, M.; Soulé, J.-F.; Doucet, H. ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 1824–1859. doi:10.1002/cctc.201402020
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  33. Beydoun, K.; Zaarour, M.; Williams, J. A. G.; Doucet, H.; Guerchais, V. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1260–1262. doi:10.1039/c2cc16327f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Zhao, L.; Bruneau, C.; Doucet, H. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 5598–5600. doi:10.1039/c3cc42226g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Xu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Li, Y.; Doucet, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 1423–1432. doi:10.1002/adsc.201300123
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Yuan, K.; Doucet, H. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 392–396. doi:10.1039/c3sc52420e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Borghese, A.; Geldhof, G.; Antoine, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 9249–9252. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.10.130
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Shibahara, F.; Yamaguchi, E.; Murai, T. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2471–2473. doi:10.1039/b920794e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Kowada, T.; Ohe, K. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2010, 31, 577–581. doi:10.5012/bkcs.2010.31.03.577
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Murata, T.; Murai, M.; Ikeda, Y.; Miki, K.; Ohe, K. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2296–2299. doi:10.1021/ol300718x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Koszarna, B.; Matczak, R.; Krzeszewski, M.; Vakuliuk, O.; Klajn, J.; Tasior, M.; Nowicki, J. T.; Gryko, D. T. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 225–231. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2013.11.088
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Fu, H. Y.; Chen, L.; Doucet, H. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 4473–4478. doi:10.1021/jo300528b
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  43. Zhao, L.; Bruneau, C.; Doucet, H. ChemCatChem 2013, 5, 255–262. doi:10.1002/cctc.201200521
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  44. Bensaid, S.; Doucet, H. ChemSusChem 2012, 5, 1559–1567. doi:10.1002/cssc.201100771
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  45. Cai, T.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, E.; Hellström, S.; Zhang, F.; Xu, S.; Inganäs, O.; Andersson, M. R. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2010, 94, 1275–1281. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2010.03.024
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities