The 2015 Impact Factor is 2.697 according to the Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports.


Open Access 2020 is an initiative to induce the transformation from subscription to open access publishing.

Confirming exceptionally high level of publishing standards


Beilstein Organic Chemistry Symposium 2016 from 5 - 7 October in Prien, Chiemsee, Germany

 
 

The oxanorbornene approach to 3-hydroxy, 3,4-dihydroxy and 3,4,5-trihydroxy derivatives of 2-aminocyclohexanecarboxylic acid

Ishmael B. Masesane1,2, Andrei S. Batsanov1, Judith A. K. Howard1, Raju Mondal1 and Patrick G. Steel1
1Department of Chemistry, University of Durham, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
2Department of Chemistry, University of Botswana, P/bag 00704, Gaborone, Botswana
Email of author Author email      Email of corresponding author Corresponding author email     
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2006, 2, No. 9.
doi:10.1186/1860-5397-2-9
 
 
 
 

Abstract

The nitro oxanorbornene adduct derived from the Diels-Alder reaction of ethyl (E)-3-nitroacrylate and furan provides a versatile template for the stereoselective synthesis of hydroxylated derivatives of 2-aminocyclohexanecarboxylic acid (ACHC).

Top

Introduction

In recent years there has been a surge of interest in cyclic β-amino acids and this has been accompanied by the proliferation of procedures for their synthesis.[1] Much of the interest in these compounds emanate from the ability of oligomers or short polymers of cyclic β-amino acids to adopt well-defined secondary structures analogous to those of natural peptides. [2-9] Such oligomers therefore have a particular appeal for extending understanding of protein structure and stabilization. However, much of this work has focused on simple cyclic β-amino acids and analogous studies of substituted derivatives are less well developed. One reason for this is that simple stereocontrolled routes to such derivatives have not been defined. In this respect, we have been exploring the use of oxanorbornene adducts derived from the Diels-Alder reaction of ethyl (E)-3-nitroacrylate and furan as versatile intermediates in the synthesis of a range of novel hydroxylated derivatives of 2-aminocyclohexanecarboxylic acid (ACHC). In previous preliminary communications we have described the application of the endo nitro adduct to the synthesis of various polyhydroxylated analogues.[10,11] In this paper, we provide the full details of this work and additionally describe the stereoselective synthesis of further novel hydroxylated derivatives of ACHC using the exo nitro oxanorbornene adduct as the template. The basis of our approach to these poly hydroxylated cyclohexane β-amino acids was the recognition that the bicyclic oxanorbornene cycloadduct, derived from the Diels-Alder reaction between furan and ethyl nitroacrylate, represented a versatile template that could be elaborated to the desired targets via a variety of complementary oxidative processes coupled with a base promoted ring fragmentation, Scheme 1.

[1860-5397-2-9-i1]
Scheme 1: The furan-nitroacylate approach to poly hydroxylated ACHC derivatives
Top

Results and Discussion

Oxanorbornene Synthesis

Efficient access to ethyl (E)-3-nitroacrylate 1 was achieved through a modification of the McMurry procedure involving the reaction of ethyl acrylate with N2O4 and I2 followed by careful elimination of HI with Hunig's base in ether.[12] With this sequence of reactions, 1 could be generated in 10–20 g batches, Scheme 1. Whilst this dienophile reacts with considerable regiocontrol (dominated by the nitro group) the stereoselectivity (endo:exo ratio) observed is frequently minimal. [13-15] Subjection of nitroacrylate 1 to cycloaddition reaction with furan in CHCl3 at room temperature gave a 2:1 mixture of cycloadducts favouring the endo nitro isomer 2a, Scheme 2. Increased endo selectivity could be achieved by carrying out the reaction at -20°C for 5 days, giving a 4:1 mixture of the two isomers in 90% yield. Attempts to further enhance this ratio through the use of a range of Lewis acids or alternative solvents were not successful. Interestingly, Just and co-workers have reported the preference for the exo-nitro adduct when the reaction of methyl 3-nitroacrylate and furan was carried out without a solvent.[16] However, in our hands, this reaction afforded a 3:1 mixture in favour of the endo-nitro adduct.

[1860-5397-2-9-i2]
Scheme 2: Reagents: i. Furan (see box); ii. Zn, HCl., EtOH then Boc2O, Et3N, 2b 89%, 3b 77%; iii. KHMDS, THF, -50°C, 4 71%, 5 69%; iv. Ac2O, Py then H2, Pd-C, 6 75%, 7 75%.

The two isomeric cycloadducts were easily separated by column chromatography. Whilst initial attempts to reduce the nitro group were complicated by difficulties in the isolation of the resultant amine, an efficient one-pot conversion into the protected aminoesters 2b and 3b was achieved by reduction with Zn/HCl followed by addition of (Boc)2O and a large excess of iPr2NEt. At this stage, confirmation of the correct assignment of the relative stereochemistry for each isomer was realised by an X-ray crystallographic structure determination of the endo carbamate 2b (see Supporting Information File 1 for details).

3-Hydroxy-2-aminocyclohexanecarboxylic acids

With the oxanorbornene template available in quantities we then explored the based promoted fragmentation needed to generate the 3-hydroxy-2-aminocyclohexanecarboxylate core. Related base promoted transformations have been described in the literature and our initial experiments followed these precedents. [17-20] Using carbamate 2b, treatment with LDA or LHMDS appeared, by TLC, to give complete conversion extremely rapidly. However, on workup, considerable amounts of the starting ester were recovered. Similar observations have been reported in related systems.[21] Speculating that this was due to either a reversible process or a stabilised, highly coordinated enolate alternative procedures were then explored. Whilst attempts to enhance the fragmentation through the use of various rapid, mildly acidic, inverse quenches or various trapping agents (e.g. TMSCl, TMSOTf) were partially successful, albeit only on very small scale, the use of a less coordinating potassium counterion (KHMDS) allowed the isolation of the dihydroanthranilate esters 4 and 5 in 71% and 69% yield respectively together with variable amounts of ethyl 3-hydroxybenzoate. Simple reduction of the corresponding acetates with H2 over Pd-C proved to be highly diastereoselective affording the anti-anti and syn-syn 3-hydroxy-2-aminocyclohexanecarboxylate esters respectively. The stereochemistry was assigned by a combination of NMR techniques using J values supported by nOe correlations, Figure 1. For example, the amide derivatives of the anti-anti isomer 8 and 9 show distinctive large di-axial couplings for 1-H, 2- H and 3-H. Final confirmation of the stereochemistry was achieved by reduction and deprotection of a single enantiomer of carbamate 4, obtained via resolution of bicyclic ester 2a, to provide 2-amino-3-hydroxycyclohexane-1-carboxylate with identical spectroscopic and analytical data to that described in the literature ([α]D21 -32 (c = 1, H2O) lit: [α]D21 -35 (c = 1, H2O).[22] We attribute the stereochemistry of the reduction of 4 to the directing effect of the NBoc carbamate vide infra, whilst the reversal observed with 5 can be attributed to the severe steric crowding of the β-face by the three syn substituents.

[1860-5397-2-9-1]
Figure 1: Selected NOESY Correlations for 69

3,4-Dihydroxy-2-aminocyclohexanecarboxylic acids

Having established an efficient entry to the oxanorbornenes and dienyl carbamates we then sort to exploit the alkene units to provide a convenient source of poly-hydroxylated cyclohexane β-aminoacids. Consequently, treatment of endo derived hydroxy diene with mCPBA in DCM afforded a separable 9:1 mixture of epoxides 10 and 11 favouring addition syn to the carbamate, Scheme 3. Highly selective epoxidations of cycloalkenyl amides have been described[23] and, consistent with a hypothesis that the mixture of 10 and 11 arise through competing H-bonding directing effects of the carbamate and hydroxyl groups, acetylation of the free hydroxyl group prior to oxidation enhanced the selectivity leading to exclusive formation of 12. In a similar fashion, and in agreement with the idea of two directing groups working in concert, epoxidation of the exo derived diene 5 afforded exclusive formation of epoxide 13. Speculating that disruption of any directing effects through the use of more polar solvents would lead to increased amounts of 12 a range of alternative solvents were screened including THF, DMF, MeOH, CF3CH2OH, MeCN. Of these, acetonitrile proving the most successful, albeit only providing a 2:1 mixture of isomers. Attempts to further enhance this reversal of selectivity using a variety of alternative procedures were not successful with most methods affording significant quantities of the corresponding protected anthranilic acid.

[1860-5397-2-9-i3]
Scheme 3: Reagents: i. mCPBA, CH2Cl2 11 : 12 (9 : 1) 77%, 15 82%; ii. Ac2O, Py then mCPBA, CH2Cl2 (13 only) 65%; iii. mCPBA, MeCN, NaHCO3 11 : 12 (1 : 2) 95%; iv. Ac2O, pyridine; v. H2, Pd/C, 14 88% from 12, 15 84% from 11, 16 97%.

Having introduced the epoxide function to either face of the diene unit we then sought conditions for regioselective cleavage. In this context, palladium mediated reactions of vinyl epoxides are known to proceed with allylic cleavage.[24] Subsequent addition of hydrogen to the intermediate π-allyl palladium complex would provide the desired 4-hydroxy-ACHC derivative. In agreement with this analysis, reaction of the epoxides with hydrogen in the presence of Pd-C afforded the corresponding 3,4-dihydroxy-2-aminocyclohexancarboxylate derivates 14–16 in excellent yield and diastereoselectivity. In each case the reduction afforded the product with a cis relationship between the 3-hydroxy group and C-1 carboxylate as ascertained by NOESY experiments, Figure 2. Whilst reactions of allylic electrophiles normally occur with anti attack by the Pd catalyst, the result using 12 suggests possible involvement of the carbamate. In this case the exception occurs with 13 which can be attributed to the severe steric crowding inhibiting such a co-ordination mode.

[1860-5397-2-9-2]
Figure 2: Selected NOESY Correlations for 1416 (R = Boc)

3,4,5-Trihydroxy-2-aminocyclohexanecarboxylic acids

The final group of targets we wished to generate was the trihydroxy analogs. Initial attempts addressed the generation of the syn 4,5 set. Consequently, OsO4 mediated dihydroxylation and subsequent peracylation of dienes 4 and 5 proved to be facio-specific and afforded cyclohexenyl derivatives 18 and 20 in 75 % yield over the two steps, Scheme 4. Reduction, as previously, afforded the trihydroxy β-aminoacid derivatives in excellent yields.

[1860-5397-2-9-i4]
Scheme 4: Reagents: i. OsO4, Me3NO.H2O, acetone 18 78% from 4 ii. TBSCl, imidazole, CH2Cl2, 17 66% from 2b; iii. LiHMDS, THF, -50-25 °C, 48%; iv. nBu4NF, THF; v. Ac2O, pyridine; vi. H2, Pd-C, 21 67% from 18, 22 51% from 19, 23 74% from 5.

At this stage it is instructive to address the interesting stereochemical outcome of this dihydroxylation reaction. Concurring with our results, Donohoe has reported that cyclic homoallylic carbamates give high levels of syn selectivity in the OsO4 mediated dihydroxylation reactions.[25,26] On the other hand, Kishi has established that the OsO4 mediated oxidation of cyclic allylic alcohols led preferentially to syn-anti triols.[27,28] On the basis of the results from our system where the two processes acted against each other, one can conclude that the homoallylic carbamate ability of stereocontrolling the OsO4 mediated reaction overrides that of the allylic hydroxyl group. Moreover, such directing effects are sufficiently strong that attempts using TMEDA/OsO4 combinations known to afford syn dihydroxylation of cyclic allylic alcohols were not successful in reversing the selectivity of the reaction with 4.

In order to introduce the syn diol unit on the opposite face to the carbamate in 4 we returned to the oxanorborne cycloadduct in which electrophile additions are known to occur from the exo face. As predicted, smooth selective formation of the desired exo diol 17 was achieved. Following double protection as a bis TBS ether, initial attempts to achieve the desired fragmentation using KHMDS failed. Fortunately, use of LiHMDS was successful albeit accompanied by the unexpected loss of Boc group. Similar strategies using either the free diol or the corresponding acetonide were not successful leading to extensive decomposition. Following TBAF promoted desilylation, peracylation and reduction afforded the trans β-amino acid derivative 22 as established by NMR experiments.

Having prepared the 4,5-cis diol, we turned our attention to the synthesis of the corresponding trans diols. These could be prepared by simple hydrolytic cleavage of epoxides 10–13. In line with this plan, treatment of 12 with aqueous perchloric acid led to a single trans diol, albeit accompanied by the loss of the Boc protecting group. Characterisation of the peracetylated derivative 27 suggested that nucleophilic attack had occurred at the allylic position. Support for this was confirmed by ring opening with ZnCl2 to afford the crystalline chlorohydrin 28 which was characterised by x-ray diffraction. Reduction of the double bond then afforded the expected all anti trihydroxy ACHC isomer 24 as confirmed by 1D and 2D NMR experiments. The observation of 10.0 Hz HaHb coupling constants in the 1H NMR spectrum of 24 for the ring protons (H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4 and H-5) is consistent with anti diaxial relationships. Such assignments are supported by nOe interactions between H-1 and H-3, H-1 and H-5 and also H-2 and H-4, Figure 3.

[1860-5397-2-9-3]
Figure 3: Selected NOESY correlations for 2426

Similar treatment of epoxides 11 and 13 then afforded the corresponding anti 4,5 diols. Subsequent reduction of the double bond gave the anti-syn-anti-anti and anti-syn-syn-anti isomers 25 and 26 as the only detectable products, Scheme 5. In each case it is noteworthy that the reduction proceeded with delivery of hydrogen to the same face as that occupied by the carbamate and opposite to the 3-acetoxy group. As previously, the stereochemical relationships were initially assigned on the basis of 2D NMR experiments, particularly NOESY. Subsequently, the structure of 26 was confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis.

[1860-5397-2-9-i5]
Scheme 5: Reagents: i. HClO4, H2O/acetone; v. Ac2O, pyridine; iii. H2, Pd/C, 24 71%, 25 67%, 26 71%

Attempt to generate the remaining epoxide isomer were confounded by an inability to overcome the directing influence of the carbamate and deliver the epoxide to the opposite face of diene 5. Similarly, whilst the alternative regiochemistry in the epoxide ring opening product could be achieved exploiting neighbouring group participation by the NBoc group to afford the cyclic carbamate 29, all attempts to induce fragmentation of this polycyclic compound have thus far proved unsuccessful.

Top

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have amplified the utility of the Diels-Alder adducts of ethyl (E)-nitroacrylate and furan by devising stereoselective routes to hydroxylated derivatives of 2-aminocyclohexanecarboxylic acid. The principal feature of this approach is the reliance on simple reactions exploiting substrate-controlled selectivity. In this respect, the ability of the carbamate group as a directing group is particularly noteworthy. The use of these hydroxylated cyclohexyl β-amino acids in the synthesis of short peptides is currently ongoing in our laboratory and will be described in due course.

Top

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Experimental procedures and spectroscopic data are provided for all new compounds including details of the X-ray diffraction studies for compounds 2b, 26 and 28.
Format: DOC   Size: 446.0 KB   Download

Top

Acknowledgements

We thank the University of Botswana (IBM) for financial support, Dr A. M. Kenwright for assistance with NMR experiments, Dr M. Jones and the EPSRC National Mass Spectrometry Service, Swansea for mass spectra and Dr Darren Orton for some preliminary experiments.

Top

References

  1. Liu, M.; Sibi, M. P. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 7991–8035. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(02)00991-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Fülöp, F.; Martinek, T. A.; Tóth, G. K. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 323–334. doi:10.1039/b501173f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Gellman, S. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 173–180. doi:10.1021/ar960298r
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Appella, D. H.; Christianson, L. A.; Karle, I. L.; Powell, D. R.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 13071–13072. doi:10.1021/ja963290l
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Cheng, R. P.; Gellman, S. H.; DeGrado, W. F. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3219–3232. doi:10.1021/cr000045i
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Raguse, T. L.; Lai, J. R.; Le Plae, P. R.; Gellman, S. H. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3963–3966. doi:10.1021/ol016868r
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Appella, D. H.; Christianson, L. A.; Klein, D. A.; Powell, R. D.; Huang, X.; Barchi, J. J. J.; Gellman, H. S. Nature 1997, 387, 381–384. doi:10.1038/387381a0
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Gademann, K.; Seebach, D. Helv. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 2925–2937. doi:10.1002/1522-2675(20011017)84:10<2924::AID-HLCA2924>3.0.CO;2-E
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Guichard, G.; Abele, S.; Seebach, D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1998, 81, 187. doi:10.1002/hlca.19980810202
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Masesane, I. B.; Steel, P. G. Synlett 2003, 735–737.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Masesane, I. B.; Steel, P. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 5007–5009. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.05.007
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. McMurry, J. E.; Musser, J. H. Org. Synth. 1977, 56, 65–68.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Danishefsky, S.; Prisbylla, M. P.; Hiner, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 2918. doi:10.1021/ja00477a071
    For an exception to this observation see reference [15].
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Clarke, C.; Fleming, I.; Fortunak, J. M. D.; Gallagher, P. T.; Honan, M. C.; Mann, A.; Nubling, C. O.; Raithby, P. R.; Wolff, J. J. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 3931. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(01)86646-1
    For an exception to this observation see reference [15].
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Michael, J. P.; Blom, N. F.; Boeyens, J. C. A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 1739–1743. doi:10.1039/p19840001739
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  16. Just, G.; Martel, A.; Grozinger, K.; Ramjeesingh, M. Can. J. Chem. 1975, 53, 131–137. doi:10.1139/v75-018
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Brion, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 5299–5302. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)85823-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Rajapaksa, D.; Keay, B. A.; Rodrigo, R. Can. J. Chem. 1984, 62, 826–827. doi:10.1139/v84-137
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Campbell, M. M.; Sainsbury, M.; Searle, P. A. Synthesis 1993, 179–193. doi:10.1055/s-1993-25824
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Evans, D. A.; Barnes, D. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 57–58. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(96)02259-9
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Couche, E.; Deschatrettes, R.; Poumellec, K.; Bortolussi, M.; Mandville, G.; Bloch, R. Synlett 1999, 87–89.
    See also reference [20].
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. McCormick, D. R. J.; Reichenthal, J.; Hirsch, U.; Sjolander, N. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 4104–4105. doi:10.1021/ja01480a043
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Barrett, S.; O'Brien, P.; Steffens, H. C.; Towers, T. D.; Voith, M. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 9633–9640. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(00)00911-X
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Trost, B. M.; Angle, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 6123–6124. doi:10.1021/ja00307a059
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Donohoe, T. J.; Mitchell, L.; Waring, M. J.; Helliwell, M.; Bell, A.; Newcombe, N. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8951–8954. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)01999-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Donohoe, T. J.; Blades, K.; Moore, P. R.; Waring, M. J.; Winter, J. J. G.; Helliwell, M.; Newcombe, N. J.; Stemp, G. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7946–7956. doi:10.1021/jo026161y
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Cha, J. K.; Christ, W. J.; Kishi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 3943–3946. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)88231-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Cha, J. K.; Christ, W. J.; Kishi, Y. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 2247–2255. doi:10.1016/0040-4020(84)80008-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Top
Figure 1: Selected NOESY Correlations for 69 Move  Close
Figure 2: Selected NOESY Correlations for 1416 (R = Boc) Move  Close
Figure 3: Selected NOESY correlations for 2426 Move  Close
Scheme 1: The furan-nitroacylate approach to poly hydroxylated ACHC derivatives Move  Close
Scheme 2: Reagents: i. Furan (see box); ii. Zn, HCl., EtOH then Boc2O, Et3N, 2b 89%, 3b 77%; iii. KHMDS, THF, -50°C, 4 71%, 5 69%; iv. Ac2O, Py then H2, Pd-C, 6 75%, 7 75%. Move  Close
Scheme 3: Reagents: i. mCPBA, CH2Cl2 11 : 12 (9 : 1) 77%, 15 82%; ii. Ac2O, Py then mCPBA, CH2Cl2 (13 only) 65%; iii. mCPBA, MeCN, NaHCO3 11 : 12 (1 : 2) 95%; iv. Ac2O, pyridine; v. H2, Pd/C, 14 88% from 12, 15 84% from 11, 16 97%. Move  Close
Scheme 4: Reagents: i. OsO4, Me3NO.H2O, acetone 18 78% from 4 ii. TBSCl, imidazole, CH2Cl2, 17 66% from 2b; iii. LiHMDS, THF, -50-25 °C, 48%; iv. nBu4NF, THF; v. Ac2O, pyridine; vi. H2, Pd-C, 21 67% from 18, 22 51% from 19, 23 74% from 5. Move  Close
Scheme 5: Reagents: i. HClO4, H2O/acetone; v. Ac2O, pyridine; iii. H2, Pd/C, 24 71%, 25 67%, 26 71% Move  Close
21.Couche, E.; Deschatrettes, R.; Poumellec, K.; Bortolussi, M.; Mandville, G.; Bloch, R. Synlett 1999, 87–89.
See also reference [20].
Go to reference 21
22.McCormick, D. R. J.; Reichenthal, J.; Hirsch, U.; Sjolander, N. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 4104–4105. doi:10.1021/ja01480a043
Go to reference 22
16.Just, G.; Martel, A.; Grozinger, K.; Ramjeesingh, M. Can. J. Chem. 1975, 53, 131–137. doi:10.1139/v75-018
Go to reference 16
17.Brion, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 5299–5302. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)85823-2
18.Rajapaksa, D.; Keay, B. A.; Rodrigo, R. Can. J. Chem. 1984, 62, 826–827. doi:10.1139/v84-137
19.Campbell, M. M.; Sainsbury, M.; Searle, P. A. Synthesis 1993, 179–193. doi:10.1055/s-1993-25824
20.Evans, D. A.; Barnes, D. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 57–58. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(96)02259-9
Go to references 17-20
12.McMurry, J. E.; Musser, J. H. Org. Synth. 1977, 56, 65–68.
Go to reference 12
13.Danishefsky, S.; Prisbylla, M. P.; Hiner, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 2918. doi:10.1021/ja00477a071
For an exception to this observation see reference [15].
14.Clarke, C.; Fleming, I.; Fortunak, J. M. D.; Gallagher, P. T.; Honan, M. C.; Mann, A.; Nubling, C. O.; Raithby, P. R.; Wolff, J. J. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 3931. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(01)86646-1
For an exception to this observation see reference [15].
15.Michael, J. P.; Blom, N. F.; Boeyens, J. C. A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 1739–1743. doi:10.1039/p19840001739
Go to references 13-15
2.Fülöp, F.; Martinek, T. A.; Tóth, G. K. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 323–334. doi:10.1039/b501173f
3.Gellman, S. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 173–180. doi:10.1021/ar960298r
4.Appella, D. H.; Christianson, L. A.; Karle, I. L.; Powell, D. R.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 13071–13072. doi:10.1021/ja963290l
5.Cheng, R. P.; Gellman, S. H.; DeGrado, W. F. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3219–3232. doi:10.1021/cr000045i
6.Raguse, T. L.; Lai, J. R.; Le Plae, P. R.; Gellman, S. H. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3963–3966. doi:10.1021/ol016868r
7.Appella, D. H.; Christianson, L. A.; Klein, D. A.; Powell, R. D.; Huang, X.; Barchi, J. J. J.; Gellman, H. S. Nature 1997, 387, 381–384. doi:10.1038/387381a0
8.Gademann, K.; Seebach, D. Helv. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 2925–2937. doi:10.1002/1522-2675(20011017)84:10<2924::AID-HLCA2924>3.0.CO;2-E
9.Guichard, G.; Abele, S.; Seebach, D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1998, 81, 187. doi:10.1002/hlca.19980810202
Go to references 2-9
10.Masesane, I. B.; Steel, P. G. Synlett 2003, 735–737.
11.Masesane, I. B.; Steel, P. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 5007–5009. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.05.007
Go to references 10,11
1.Liu, M.; Sibi, M. P. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 7991–8035. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(02)00991-2
Go to reference 1
27.Cha, J. K.; Christ, W. J.; Kishi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 3943–3946. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)88231-3
28.Cha, J. K.; Christ, W. J.; Kishi, Y. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 2247–2255. doi:10.1016/0040-4020(84)80008-3
Go to references 27,28
15.Michael, J. P.; Blom, N. F.; Boeyens, J. C. A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 1739–1743. doi:10.1039/p19840001739
Go to reference 15
15.Michael, J. P.; Blom, N. F.; Boeyens, J. C. A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 1739–1743. doi:10.1039/p19840001739
Go to reference 15
20.Evans, D. A.; Barnes, D. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 57–58. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(96)02259-9
Go to reference 20
23.Barrett, S.; O'Brien, P.; Steffens, H. C.; Towers, T. D.; Voith, M. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 9633–9640. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(00)00911-X
Go to reference 23
24.Trost, B. M.; Angle, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 6123–6124. doi:10.1021/ja00307a059
Go to reference 24
25.Donohoe, T. J.; Mitchell, L.; Waring, M. J.; Helliwell, M.; Bell, A.; Newcombe, N. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8951–8954. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)01999-2
26.Donohoe, T. J.; Blades, K.; Moore, P. R.; Waring, M. J.; Winter, J. J. G.; Helliwell, M.; Newcombe, N. J.; Stemp, G. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7946–7956. doi:10.1021/jo026161y
Go to references 25,26
© 2006 Masesane et al; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)