Gold-catalyzed naphthalene functionalization

  1. ,
  2. and
Laboratorio de Catálisis Homogénea, Departamento de Química y Ciencia de los Materiales, Unidad Asociada al CSIC, Centro de Investigación en Química Sostenible (CIQSO), Universidad de Huelva, Campus de El Carmen 21007-Huelva, Spain
  1. Author email
  2. Corresponding author email
Guest Editor: F. D. Toste
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 653–657. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.7.77
Received 31 Mar 2011, Accepted 12 May 2011, Published 23 May 2011
Full Research Paper
cc by logo
Album

Abstract

The complexes IPrMCl (IPr = 1,3-bis(diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene, M = Cu, 1a; M = Au, 1b), in the presence of one equiv of NaBAr'4 (Ar' = 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl), catalyze the transfer of carbene groups: C(R)CO2Et (R = H, Me) from N2C(R)CO2Et to afford products that depend on the nature of the metal center. The copper-based catalyst yields exclusively a cycloheptatriene derivative from the Buchner reaction, whereas the gold analog affords a mixture of products derived either from the formal insertion of the carbene unit into the aromatic C–H bond or from its addition to a double bond. In addition, no byproducts derived from carbene coupling were observed.

Introduction

At the end of the nineteenth century, Buchner discovered [1] the thermal and photochemical route for the functionalization of benzene using diazo compounds to provide a carbene moiety. The first step of this transformation consists of the addition of such a unit to the aromatic double bond to give a norcaradiene intermediate that spontaneously undergoes ring opening to afford the more stable cycloheptatriene product (Scheme 1) [2]. Nearly one century later, Teyssié and co-workers discovered the potential of dirhodium tetraacetate and related Rh2(L-L)4 compounds as catalysts for the decomposition of diazo compounds and subsequent transfer of the carbene moiety to several saturated and unsaturated substrates, including aromatics [3]. Thus, the reaction of ethyl diazoacetate (EDA) with benzene in the presence of such catalysts at room temperature exclusively affords the cycloheptatriene product in quantitative yields. The reaction, always referred to the intermolecular version, was later observed with other metal-based catalysts [4-6].

[1860-5397-7-77-i1]

Scheme 1: (a) The Buchner reaction of benzene and ethyl diazoacetate and (b) the Rh-catalyzed version. (c) Both pathways involve the formation of norcaradiene intermediates.

The above transformation with rhodium-based catalysts [7,8] has also been investigated with naphthalene as a substrate. In this case, Teyssié and co-workers showed that it could be converted, using t-butyl diazoacetate, into norcaradiene type derivatives, formed by the cyclopropanation of one of the double bonds of the naphthalene ring. Later, Müller and co-workers [9] showed the effect of a series of Rh2(L-L)4 in the same transformation but with ethyl diazoacetate as the carbene source. A mixture of the products (2ad) arising from cyclopropanation, ring opening and the formal insertion of CHCO2Et into the aromatic C–H bonds were observed, with 2a being by far the major product (Scheme 2).

[1860-5397-7-77-i2]

Scheme 2: The Buchner reaction applied to naphthalene. (a) Teyssié's system. (b) Müller's system.

In the course of our research, focussed on the development of group 11 metal-based catalysts for carbene transfer reactions from diazo compounds [10], we found that the gold complex IPrAuCl (1b) (IPr = 1,3-bis(diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene) in the presence of one equiv of NaBAr'4 (Ar' = 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl) induced the functionalization of benzene with ethyl diazoacetate to give a mixture of a cycloheptatriene and ethyl 2-phenylacetate [11], the latter being the result of the formal insertion of the CHCO2Et group into the C–H bond of benzene as well as the major product (Scheme 3). In this contribution, we report the results obtained from the analogous transformation using naphthalene as the substrate, with copper- and gold-based catalysts, not previously described for the functionalization of such fused arenes.

[1860-5397-7-77-i3]

Scheme 3: The gold-catalyzed reaction of benzene and EDA.

Results and Discussion

Reaction of naphthalene and diazoacetates catalyzed by IPrMCl (M = Cu, Au)

When dichloroethane solutions of naphthalene were treated with ethyl diazoacetate in the presence of catalytic amounts (5%) of a 1:1 mixture of IPrMCl (M = Cu, 1a; M = Au, 1b) and NaBAr'4, the diazo compound was consumed after 24 h at 60 °C (no significant reaction was observed at room temperature or at 40 °C). NMR analysis of the crude reaction product revealed that when 1a was used as the catalyst, only one compound was formed, identified as ethyl 1a,7b-dihydro-1H-cyclopropa[a]naphthalene-1-carboxylate (2a), i.e., the product derived from the direct cyclopropanation of the naphthalene C–C double bond (Scheme 4a). By contrast, the use of the gold catalyst IPrAuCl (1b) under the same reaction conditions gave a mixture of three compounds, in ca. 65:20:15 ratio, that have been identified as 2a, ethyl 2-(naphthalen-1-yl)acetate (2b) and ethyl 2-(naphthalen-2-yl)acetate (2c). Compounds 2b and 2c, respectively, are derived from the formal insertion of the carbene group into a C–H bond of naphthalene (Scheme 4b). The selectivity observed is similar to that reported by Müller's group with [Rh2(O2CC3F7)4] (60:22:18) [8]. However, in our case the yield of products (EDA-based) was quantitative: products derived from dimerization of the diazo compound, i.e., diethyl fumarate and maleate, were not detected. The absence of the fused cycloheptatriene 2d in our system is also noteworthy. Substituted naphthalenes with OMe or Cl substituents at the beta position were also employed as substrates, however, the yields of the desired products were nearly negligible. The former seemed to induce the insertion into the Me groups, whereas in the latter case the aromatic reagent seemed deactivated.

[1860-5397-7-77-i4]

Scheme 4: The functionalization of naphthalene with ethyl diazoacetate catalyzed by the complexes (a) 1a and (b) 1b.

We have expanded this reaction to ethyl 2-diazopropionate as the diazo component. Following a similar protocol, naphthalene was reacted in dichloroethane with ethyl 2-diazopropionate in the presence of a 1:1 mixture of 1a,b and NaBAr'4 (5% with respect to the diazo compound). Similarly to the previous results, the fused norcaradiene 3a (Scheme 5) was exclusively and quantitatively formed using the copper catalyst 1a, whilst the use of 1b afforded a mixture of three products in a 60:20:20 ratio. The major product was identified as the 3a and the minor products have been characterized as the insertion products of the carbene C(Me)CO2Et into the α- and β-C–H bonds of naphthalene, 3b and 3c, respectively. When other diazo reagents such as Me3SiC(N2)CO2Et or PhC(N2)CO2Et were employed, intractable mixtures of compounds, probably due to multiple insertions, were observed by NMR.

[1860-5397-7-77-i5]

Scheme 5: The functionalization of naphthalene with ethyl 2-diazopropionate catalyzed by complexes 1a and 1b.

It is also worth mentioning that the above transformations do not compete with the formation of byproducts derived from the catalytic dimerization of the diazo reagents, a common drawback in this methodology [2]. Despite of adding all the diazo compound in one portion at the beginning of the reaction, the final reaction mixture only showed resonances due to the aforementioned insertion and addition products. This is at variance with other reported systems that required the use of slow addition devices to diminish the formation of such byproducts.

Conclusion

The complexes IPrMCl (M = Cu, Au) catalyze the transfer of carbene groups C(R)CO2Et (R = H, Me) to naphthalene, in the presence of NaBAr'4 as halide scavenger, to give mixtures of products via carbene insertion into a C–H bond or by addition to a double bond. In the case of copper, norcaradiene type compounds are formed quantitatively. The use of the gold analogue also induces the formation of such fused cyclopropanes in addition to the products derived from the formal insertion of the carbene units into the C–H bonds of naphthalene. The system is completely chemoselective with regards to arene functionalization (with no diazo compound dimerization being observed).

Experimental

All reactions and manipulations were carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere. Organic solvents were dried, distilled, and degassed before use. The reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Complexes IPrMCl (M = Cu, 1a; M = Au, 1b), NaBAr'4 and ethyl 2-diazopropionate were prepared by literature procedures [12-16]. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercury 400 spectrometer in CDCl3 as solvent, with chemical shifts (δ) referenced to internal standards.

General catalytic experiment

Complex 1 (0.025 mmol) was dissolved in dichloroethane (5 mL) and one equiv of NaBAr'4 added to the solution, which was then added to a solution of naphthalene (8.6 mmol, 10 mL) and heated at 60 °C in dichloroethane (20 mL). After stirring for 15 min, (R)C(N2)CO2Et (R = H, Me; 0.5 mmol) was added in one portion, and the mixture stirred for 24 h. Removal of volatiles followed by silica gel column chromatography (1:1 Et2O:petroleum ether) gave a mixture of products. The products 2a, 3b and 3c were identified by comparison with literature data [17-19], and 2b and 2c were compared authentic samples obtained from commercial sources.

Spectroscopic data for 3a: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.41–6.94 (m, 4H), 6.59 (d, 1H), 6.06 (dd, 1H), 4.23 (m, 2H), 3.14 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 2.72 (dd, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 1.26 (s, 3H), 1.29 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.0 (CO2Et), 146.4, 134.5, 133.4, 129.6, 128.5, 127.7, 126.6, 125.5 (aromatic), 63.1 (COCH2CH3), 39.6, 33.3, 31.2 (cyclopropyl), 19.52 (CH3), 11.8 (COCH2CH3); MS m/z (%): 228 (70), 199 (30), 182 (100).

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank DGI (CTQ2008-00042BQU and Consolider Ingenio 2010, Grant CSD2006-0003) and Junta de Andalucía (P07-FQM-02870) for funding.

References

  1. Buchner, E.; Curtius, T. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1885, 18, 2377–2379. doi:10.1002/cber.188501802119
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Doyle, M. P.; McKervey, M. A.; Ye, T. Modern Catalytic Methods for Organic Synthesis with Diazo Compounds; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1998.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  3. Anciaux, A. J.; Demonceau, A.; Noels, A. F.; Hubert, A. J.; Warin, R.; Teyssié, P. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 873–876. doi:10.1021/jo00318a010
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Morilla, M. E.; Díaz-Requejo, M. M.; Belderraín, T. R.; Nicasio, M. C.; Trofimenko, S.; Pérez, P. J. Organometallics 2004, 23, 293–295. doi:10.1021/om034156u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Lovely, C. J.; Browning, R. G.; Badarinarayana, V.; Dias, H. V. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2453–2455. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2005.02.052
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Mbuvi, H. M.; Woo, L. K. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2009, 13, 136–152. doi:10.1142/S1088424609000036
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Buchner, E.; Hediger, S. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1903, 36, 3502–3509. doi:10.1002/cber.190303603138
    Buchner also discovered this transformation by heating of naphthalene and ethyl diazoacetate at 140 °C.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Anciaux, A. J.; Demonceau, A.; Hubert, A. J.; Noels, A. F.; Petiniot, N.; Teyssié, P. H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1980, 765–766. doi:10.1039/C39800000765
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  9. Müller, P.; Toujas, J.-L.; Bernardinelli, G. Helv. Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 1525–1534. doi:10.1002/1522-2675(20000705)83:7<1525::AID-HLCA1525>3.0.CO;2-1
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Díaz-Requejo, M. M.; Pérez, P. J. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3379–3394. doi:10.1021/cr078364y
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Fructos, M. R.; Belderrain, T. R.; de Frémont, P.; Scott, N. M.; Nolan, S. P.; Díaz-Requejo, M. M.; Pérez, P. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5284–5288. doi:10.1002/anie.200501056
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Jurkauskas, V.; Sadighi, J. P.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 14, 2417–2420. doi:10.1021/ol034560p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. de Frémont, P.; Scott, N. M.; Stevens, E. D.; Nolan, S. P. Organometallics 2005, 24, 2411–2418. doi:10.1021/om050111c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Brookhart, M.; Grant, B.; Volpe, A. F., Jr. Organometallics 1992, 11, 3920–3922. doi:10.1021/om00059a071
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Iwamoto, H.; Sonoda, T.; Kobayashi, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 4703–4706. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)86232-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Bachmann, S.; Fielenbach, D.; Jørgensen, K. A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 3044–3049. doi:10.1039/b412053a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Huisgen, R.; Juppe, G. Chem. Ber. 1961, 94, 2332–2349. doi:10.1002/cber.19610940859
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Fleming, F. F.; Liu, W. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 699–708. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200801053
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Hou, J.; Zhou, H.; Zhou, Z.; Chen, L.; Ou, Q. Anal. Lett. 1996, 29, 2755–2760.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities