3 article(s) from Mayor, Marcel
- Full Research Paper
- Published 02 Feb 2017
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Sketch of the photocleavable 2-(phenoxymethyl)-1-nitrobenzene subunit and its intramolecular photon...
-
![]()
Scheme 1: Synthesis of the trimeric target structure 1. Reagents and conditions: a) NaBH4, THF, 30 min, rt, q...
-
![]()
Figure 2: Qualitative photocleavage experiment of the monomer 4 irradiated at 355 nm inside the NMR spectrome...
-
![]()
Figure 3: Continuous illumination of the trimer 1 in dichloromethane solution by UV light of 254 nm (a) and 3...
-
![]()
Figure 4: Molecular beam machine to study the photodepletion of the photoactive monomer in high vacuum. The p...
-
![]()
Figure 5: Photodepletion of the photocleavable nitrobenzyl derivative. When the dissociation laser pulse with...
-
![]()
Figure 6: Depletion ratio, i.e., fraction of remaining parent molecules, versus laser fluence (photons per pu...
-
![]()
Figure 7: Bond-selective dissociation and photoinduced beam depletion shall enable novel absorptive optical g...
-
-
Supp. Info
- Review
- Published 08 Mar 2016
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Schematic drawing of a molecule attached to the surface via a tripodal structure.
-
![]()
Figure 2: Aliphatic tripodal structures 1–5.
-
![]()
Figure 3: Trialkylarylsilane platforms 6–8.
-
![]()
Figure 4: Structure of extended adamantane-based scaffolds 9–12.
-
![]()
Figure 5: Structure of adamantane tripodal molecules 13–16.
-
![]()
Figure 6: (a) UHV-NC-AFM image (350 × 350 nm2, Δf = −28 Hz) of 4-carboxyazobenzene 13 adsorbed on Au(111) usi...
-
![]()
Figure 7: Adamantane-based tripods 17–20.
-
![]()
Figure 8: (a) ORTEP drawing of 17 as determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis at 100 K. Ellips...
-
![]()
Figure 9: Schematic adsorption models of trimers (a), hexagon (b) and SAMs (c) of 17 on Au(111). B (B’) is th...
-
![]()
Figure 10: Adamantane and cyclohexane-based tridental platforms.
-
![]()
Figure 11: Structure of aliphatic multipodal adsorbates.
-
![]()
Figure 12: Functionalized tetraphenylmethane tripods 29–32.
-
![]()
Figure 13: Structure of pyridine terminated platforms 33–35.
-
![]()
Figure 14: Structures of the junctions used for the ab initio transport calculations, (a) 34 (111) model and (...
-
![]()
Figure 15: Redox-active tripodal structures 36 and 37.
-
![]()
Figure 16: Self-decoupled porphyrin with a tetraphenylmethane scaffold 38.
-
![]()
Figure 17: Schematic configuration of 38 on Au(111) and localized electrical excitation from a nanotip. Reprin...
-
![]()
Figure 18: Structure of tripodal [2]rotaxanes 39.
-
![]()
Figure 19: Tetraphenylsilane-based platforms 40.
-
![]()
Figure 20: Structure of surface-bound molecular motors 41 for gold surfaces.
-
![]()
Figure 21: Fullerene-terminated tetraphenylmethane platforms 42 and 43.
-
![]()
Figure 22: Structure of the tripodal luminescent ruthenium complex 44.
-
![]()
Figure 23: Bis(terpyridine)–Fe(II) oligomer wires terminated with a tripodal scaffold 45.
-
![]()
Figure 24: Structure of altitudinal light-driven molecular motors 46 and 47 for gold surfaces.
-
![]()
Figure 25: Structure of the rigid 9,9’-spirobifluorene platform 48.
-
![]()
Figure 26: (a) Highly ordered island of molecular tripods 48 (yellow) and remaining CH2Cl2 (dark purple) on th...
-
![]()
Figure 27: Organometallic tripodal scaffolds 49–51.
-
![]()
Figure 28: Dipolar and nonpolar altitudinal molecular rotors 52 and 53.
-
![]()
Figure 29: Optimized representative eclipsed (A) and staggered (B) conformations of the MMP diastereomer of 52...
-
![]()
Figure 30: Structure of triazatriangulenium 54 and trioxatriangulenium 55 scaffolds.
-
![]()
Figure 31: (a) STM image of a porphyrin–TATA adlayer of a zinc-porphyrin derivative of the octyl-TATA platform ...
-
- Full Research Paper
- Published 20 Dec 2011
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: (a) Topography (color bar: 0–70 nm), (b) phase (color bar: 0–15 degrees), (c) error signal (scale i...
-
![]()
Figure 2: (a) Topography (color bar: 0–70 nm), (b) phase (color bar: 0–15 degrees), (c) error signal (scale i...
-
![]()
Figure 3: (a) Topography (color bar: 0–15 nm), (b) phase (color bar: 0–20 degrees), (c) error signal (scale i...
-
![]()
Figure 4: Histogram of the normalized modulus for different illumination conditions: As prepared, at 365 nm f...
-
![]()
Figure 5: Displacement vectors for the normal mode that dominates the averaged force constant of (a) trans- a...
-
![]()
Figure 6: (a) Arrangement of the fixed sulfur atoms in the MD model of the SAM. The unit cell that has been p...
-
![]()
Figure 7: Compound 1 and compound 2 (2-DA-thiol), showing the deprotection reaction yielding the molecule use...
-
![]()
Figure 8: AFM images of (a) clean evaporated Au surface (500 × 500 nm2 color bar 12 nm) and (b) surface coate...
-
![]()
Figure 9: UV–vis spectra for thio-2-DA in chloroform solution after exposure to 365 nm light (cis form) and 4...
-
![]()
Figure 10: Sketch of the model used to derive SAM stiffness from QM results on the single molecule. (a) A is t...
-
![]()
Figure 11: Computational compression procedure: Force acting on the indenter as a function of the distance bet...
-
