2 article(s) from Wernsdorfer, Wolfgang
- Full Research Paper
- Published 28 Jan 2016
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Molecular structure of complex 3 obtained from single-crystal diffraction. Dy(III) ions are marked ...
-
![]()
Figure 2: (a) Experimental χMT(T) and fitting (red trace) for compound 1 (parameters for fitting are describe...
-
![]()
Figure 3: Molar magnetic susceptibility (χMT) vs T plot for 2–5 under 0.1 T DC field and molar magnetization (...
-
![]()
Figure 4: Experimental dynamic magnetic behavior for 3. (a) χ"M(T) measured under a zero field (3.5 Oe AC fie...
-
![]()
Figure 5: Experimental dynamic magnetic behavior for 5. (a) χ"M(T) measured under an applied DC field of 800 ...
-
![]()
Figure 6: Single-crystal measurements of M(H)/MS vs µ0H measured on a micro-SQUID array for 3 (a) at 0.03 K a...
-
![]()
Figure 7: Magnetic axes obtained through the electrostatic method: (a) side and (b) top view for compound 3. ...
-
![]()
Figure 8: STM topography of 2 after deposition on Au(111). Image sizes are (a) 60 × 60 nm2 and (c) 20 × 20 nm2...
-
-
Supp. Info
- Full Research Paper
- Published 11 Mar 2015
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: a) I–V curve recorded for a typical electroburning (EB) process. Inset: optical image of one of the...
-
![]()
Figure 2: top) Number of measured devices displaying the following behavior: A) sizeable tunneling current (I...
-
![]()
Figure 3: (top) Ibreak current at which the EB process was observed in air (filled dots) and under vacuum (op...
-
![]()
Figure 4: a) SEM image of epitaxial graphene devices after the EB process in air (left) and under vacuum (rig...
-
![]()
Figure 5: a) SEM image of a non-patterned disc after the EB process. During EB the area around the graphene–m...
-
-
Supp. Info
