Synthesis and glycosidase inhibitory activity of new hexa-substituted C8-glycomimetics

  1. 1 ,
  2. 1 ,
  3. 1 ,
  4. 2 and
  5. 1
1Université Paris Descartes, UMR 8601 CNRS, Laboratoire de Chimie et Biochimie Pharmacologiques et Toxicologiques, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France
2Université Paris Descartes, UMR 8015 CNRS, Laboratoire de Cristallographie et RMN Biologiques, 4 avenue de l'Observatoire, 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France
  1. Author email
  2. Corresponding author email

Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2005, 1, No. 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1860-5397-1-12
Received 22 Jul 2005, Accepted 07 Oct 2005, Published 07 Oct 2005
Full Research Paper
cc by logo

Abstract

Background

Glycosidases are involved in several metabolic pathways and the development of inhibitors is an important challenge towards the treatment of diseases, such as diabetes, cancer and viral infections including AIDS. Thus, inhibition of intestinal α-glucosidases can be used to treat diabetes through the lowering of blood glucose levels, and α-glucosidase inhibitors are being marketed against type 2 (non-insulinodependent mellitus) diabetes (i.e.: Glyset® or Diastabol®, Basen® and Glucor® or Precose®).

Results

In that context, new C8-carbasugars and related aminocyclitols have been targeted in order to study the effect of the enhanced flexibility and of the new spatial distribution displayed by these structures on their adaptability in the active site of the enzymes. The synthesis of these new C8-glycomimetics is described from enantiomerically pure C2-symmetrical polyhydroxylated cyclooctenes. Their obtention notably involved a syn-dihydroxylation, and more extended functionalization through formation of a cis-cyclic sulfate followed by amination and subsequent reductive amination. This strategy involving the nucleophilic opening of a cis-cyclic sulfate by sodium azide is to our knowledge the first example in C8-series. It revealead to be an efficient alternative to the nucleoplilic opening of an epoxide moiety which proved unsuccessful in this particular case, due to the hindered conformation of such epoxides as demonstrated by X-ray cristallographic analysis.

Conclusion

The biological activity of the synthesized glycomimetics has been evaluated towards 24 commercially available glycosidases. The weak observed activities can probably be related to the spatial disposition of the hydroxy and amino groups which depart too much from that realized in glycomimetics such as valiolamine, voglibose and valienamine. Nevertheless, the synthetic strategy described here is efficient and general, and could be extended to increase the diversity of the glycosidase inhibitors obtained since this diversity is introduced in an ultimate step of the synthesis.

Introduction

There is a considerable interest in the design of molecules able to mimic carbohydrates which play critical roles in various biological events such as for example, cell-cell recognition and adhesion, cell growth and differentiation.[1-9] In this context, the goal is to obtain new compounds with improved efficacy, stability and specificity. Thus, a change from an aldopyranoside to a 1-deoxy-iminosugar (Figure 1) decreases the vulnerability of the resulting glycomimetic towards glycosidases, while the core structure and essential network of hydroxyl functionalities for enzyme recognition are retained. An important example is the 1-deoxynojirimycin (DNJ) family, for which DNJ itself is a competitive inhibitor of α-D-glucosidase (Ki = 8–25 μM),[10] while its derivatives miglustat (N-nBu DNJ, Zavesa®) and miglitol (N-hydroxethyl DNJ, Glyset® or Diastabol®) have already found therapeutic applications in Gaucher's disease [11] and type 2 (non-insulino-dependant mellitus) diabetes, [12,13] respectively. In the past decade, works have been targeted to carbasugars originally consisting of six-membered cyclitols, related to valiolamine, [14] voglibose, [15] valienamine, [16] and acarbose. [17] The last two compounds, marketed as Basen® and Glucor® or Precose®, respectively, are also actually used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. All these compounds can have their amino moiety protonated, and the corresponding ammonium ions mimick the charge of the presumed transition states or intermediates of the enzymatic glycoside hydrolyses [18].

[1860-5397-1-12-1]

Figure 1: Sugars, iminosugars and carbasugars.

More recently, attention has been increasingly accorded to seven- and eight-membered ring systems [19-30] in order to study the effect of the enhanced flexibility and of the new spatial distribution displayed by these structures on their adaptability in the active site of the enzyme.

As part of a program directed to the synthesis of potential glycosidases inhibitors, [31,32] we focused on the access to new eight-membered carbasugars (Figure 2, A = OH) and related aminocyclitols (A = NHR) from C2-symmetrical L-ido- or D-manno- cyclooctene, easily available by ring closing metathesis of 1,9-diene derived from L-ido- or D-manno-bis-epoxide [33]. Thus, synthetic potentialities of the newly created cyclic double bond were explored to reach hexa-substituted C8-glycomimetics.

[1860-5397-1-12-2]

Figure 2: Retrosynthetic analysis.

Results and discussion

From the C2-symmetrical L-ido- or D-manno- cyclooctene, 1 or 2, to obtain the C8 hexa-substitued carbasugars a straightfoward approach seemed to be a dihydroxylation, whereas to obtain the corresponding aminocyclitols it could be an epoxidation followed by the nucleophilic opening of the epoxide moiety by a primary amine or another nitrogen nucleophile. Accordingly (Scheme 1), treatment of the fully O-protected L-ido-cyclooctene 1 with a 5 mol% aqueous solution of osmium(IV) tetroxide [34] in acetone in the presence of N-methylmorpholine oxide and tert-butanol cleanly led to the expected cis-diol 3 in 97% yield. In analogous manner, the D-manno-cyclooctene 2 gave the corresponding cis-diol 4 in 97% yield. In each case, the cis-diol 3 or 4 has been isolated as a single stereoisomer because of the C2-axis of symmetry displayed by the L-ido or D-manno-cyclooctenes 1 and 2. Then, simultaneous acidic hydrolysis of all the O-protective groups of 3 and 4 furnished the C8 hexa-substitued carbasugars 5 and 6 (80 to 97% overall yield for the two steps).

[1860-5397-1-12-i1]

Scheme 1: Reagents and conditions: (a) OsO4, NMO, tBuOH, rt; (b) TFA, H2O, rt.

Now, to reach the corresponding aminocyclitols, we turned to the epoxidation [35] of the cyclooctenes 1 and 2 (Scheme 2). Thus, treatment of 1 and 2 with meta-chloroperbenzoic acid in the presence of sodium hydrogen carbonate afforded the epoxides 7 and 8 in 91–96% yield. As precedently, because of the C2-axis of symmetry displayed by the L-ido or D-manno-cyclooctenes 1 and 2 the cis-epoxide 7 or 8 has been isolated as a single stereoisomer. However, all attempts to open the epoxide ring involving various nucleophiles, sodium azide, benzylamine, n-butylamine, or serinol in different experimental conditions, protic or aprotic solvent, presence or absence of a Lewis acid catalyst such as ytterbium triflate, revealed unsuccessful, only leading to recover the starting material.

[1860-5397-1-12-i2]

Scheme 2: Reagents and conditions: (a) mCPBA, CH2Cl2, NaHCO3, rt; (b) see text.

To overcome this difficulty, we turned to a more electrophilic sulfate moiety [36] (Scheme 3). Thus, treatment of the cis-diols 3 and 4 with thionyl chloride in the presence of triethylamine followed by subsequent oxidation with sodium periodate in the presence of ruthenium trichloride gave the cyclic sulfates 9 and 10 in 80–100% yield. Nucleophilic opening of these sulfates by sodium azide in DMF at 80°C, [37] followed by acidic hydrolysis of the resulting acyclic sulfate ester cleanly afforded the corresponding azido-alcohols 11 and 12, isolated as single stereoisomers in excellent yield (95–98%). No other isomer of 11 or 12 was detected by NMR analysis, indicating that the ring-opening reaction is highly regioselective and results in the anti addition of the azido group on the opposite side of the bulky TBDMS group in β-position. However, it has to be pointed out that more hindered nucleophiles, such as primary amines, revealed unable to open the cyclic sulfate 9 or 10.

[1860-5397-1-12-i3]

Scheme 3: Reagents and conditions: (a) i : SOCl2, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 0°C; ii : RuCl3, NaIO4, CCl4, CH3CN, 0°C to rt; (b) NaN3, DMF, 80°C; (c) H2, Pd black, EtOAc; (d) i: TFA, H2O, rt; ii: Dowex-50WX8 H+ resin, 1% NH4OH; (e) Ti(OiPr)4, OC(CH2O)2CMe2, CH2Cl2 then NaBH3CN, EtOH.

The absolute configurations of 11 and 12 were established by NMR studies. 1H signals were assigned (Table 1) using 2D-COSY and 2D-TOCSY experiments starting from hydroxyl group at C8-position.

Table 1: Selected 1H NMR data for compound 11 in CDCl3 at 500 MHz.

Proton δ1H (ppm) 2J,3J (Hz)
1 3.73 3J1-2a = 2.2
3J1-2b = 9.0
3J1-8 = 9.5
2a (proS) 2.06 2J2a-2b = -15.4
3J2a-3 = 6.5
2b (proR) 1.90 3J2b-3 = 1.5
3 4.04 3J3-4 = 4.2
4 3.50 3J4-5 = 9.5
5 3.59 3J5-6 = 6.3
6 3.94 3J6-7a = 1.8
3J6-7b = 5.5
7a (proR) 2.06 2J7a-7b = -15.4
3J7a-8 = 8.8
7b (proS) 1.95 3J7b-8 = 1.5
8 3.73  
8-OH 2.39  

The determination of all the coupling constants and particularly of the 3J1,8 was not possible by homodecoupling experiments. Thus, numerical simulation was used for an in depth study of the complex coupling patterns to set the parameters in complete analogy with regard to the experimental spectra. These 3J1H,1H coupling constants, determined by simulation (Figure 3) of 1D spectra with NMR-SIM started from XWIN-NMR software (Bruker), are gathered in Table 1. These values allowed us to restrain the number of conformations for the eight-membered ring. For example, in compound 11, the large 3J1H,1H coupling constants found between H1 and H8, H1 and H2 (proR), H8 and H7 (proR), H4 and H5, are in agreement with protons in a pseudo-axial position. On the other hand, the small 3J1H,1H coupling constants found between H1 and H2 (proS), H8 and H7 (proS) indicate a pseudo-equatorial position of protons H2 (proS) and H7 (proS). NOE measurements and finally Molecular Dynamic calculations using Insight II software (Biosym Technologies, San Diego, CA) allowed to deduce the structure of 11 (Figure 4). Prochiral H2 (proS) and H7 (proS) protons displayed strong NOEs with the TBDMS groups, respectively in positions 3 and 6, indicating they are pointing away from the C8 ring in a pseudo-equatorial position. Hence, the protons H7 (proR), H6, H4 are close together and represent one face (upper) of the C8 ring, while H2 (proR), H5, H3 represent the other face. Then, in compound 11, the strong NOEs H1-H4 and H8-H5 indicate that H1 and H8 are in opposite side in an anti configuration with pseudo-axial positions. A similar approach was applied for the structural determination of 12.

[1860-5397-1-12-3]

Figure 3: 1D proton NMR spectra of the C8 ring in compound 11 (upper) and the simulated signals (down) on the basis of the chemical shifts and coupling constants summarized in Table 1.

[1860-5397-1-12-4]

Figure 4: Schematic representation of the NOEs (indicated with arrows) found to deduce the structure of 11. Bold arrows show the NOEs found between the protons (in bold) of the upper face of the C8 ring. Prochiral 1H are labelled pR or pS.

The low reactivity of the epoxide function of 7 could be explained by the steric hindrance of the tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy groups in β-positions as confirmed by the X-ray crystallography (Figure 5). Furthermore, it seems that the C8-carbacycle of the tricyclic system [5-8-3] adopts a twist-boat-chair conformation. Whereas that of the sulfate 9, which crystallizes as a dimer, constituted by a tricyclic system [5-8-5] adopts a more flexible boat-chair conformation, thus allowing its opening by a linear nucleophile (azide anion), but not by a more hindered nucleophile (primary amine).

[1860-5397-1-12-5]

Figure 5: X-ray structure of epoxide 7 (upper) and sulfate 9 (down) solved using SHELXS and anisotropically refined using SHELXL programs [38].

With the key enantiomerically pure azido-alcohol 11 and 12 in hands, we next turned to the obtention of C8-aminocyclitols. Thus, reduction of the azido group of 11 by dihydrogen in the presence of palladium black in ethyl acetate (Scheme 3) afforded the amino-alcohol 13 which could be submitted to acidic hydrolysis of the O-protective groups to give, after purification by ion-exchange chromatography, the targeted aminocyclitol 15 [20] (95% overall yield from 11). Alternatively, to obtain an analog of voglibose, the amine function of 13 could be alkylated via a reductive amination [39] with a dihydroxyacetone derivative. Thus, treatment of the amine 13 by the commercially available 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxan-5-one in the presence of titanium(IV) tetra-isopropoxide followed by the cyanoborohydride reduction of the imine intermediate gave the expected N-alkylated aminocyclitol 17 (46% overall yield from 11). Then, simultaneous acidic hydrolysis of all protective groups led to the C8-voglibose mimetic 19 after purification by ion-exchange chromatography. The same sequence of reactions was uneventfully applied to the azido-alcohol 12 to afford the aminocyclitols 16 and 20.

The new C8-carbasugars 5 and 6 and C8-aminocyclitols 15, 16, 19 and 20 have been assayed for their inhibitory activity towards 24 commercially available glycosidases [40,41]. They did not inhibit the following enzymes at 1 mM concentration and optimal pH : α-D-glucosidases (maltase) from yeast and rice, β-D-glucosidase from caldocellum saccharolyticum, α-L-fucosidases from bovine epididymis and human placenta, α-D-galactosidases from coffee beans and Escherichia coli, β-D-galactosidases from Escherichia coli, bovine liver, Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus orizae, α-N-acetylgalactosaminidase from chicken liver, β-N-acetylglucosaminidases from Jack bean, bovine epididymis A and bovine epididymis B, α-D-mannosidase from almonds, β-D-mannosidase from Helix pomatia, and β-xylosidase from Aspergillus niger. For other enzymes: α-D-glucosidase from Bacillus stearothermophilus, amyloglucosidase from Aspergillus niger and Rhizopus mold, β-D-glucosidase from almonds, α-L-fucosidase from bovine kidney, and α-D-mannosidase from Jack beans the results are shown in Table 2. Each of these new compounds revealed weak inhibitor of the tested enzymes with a percentage of inhibition not over than 30%. These results show that the enhanced flexibility displayed by C8-glycomimetics does not seem to be correlated with an increase in observed activity. Thus, for example we had previously shown that the corresponding C7-voglibose mimic exhibited interesting activity towards amyloglucosidases from Aspergillus niger and Rhizopus mold (35 and 18 μM respectively, unpublished results). Furthermore, even if data concerning biological activity of C8-glycomimetics are seldom, the reported activities are often weak [24-30].

Table 2: Inhibitory activities for C8-carbasugars 5–6, and for C8-aminocyclitols 15, 16, 19 and 20. Percentage of inhibitions at 1 mM.

Enzymea 5 6 15 16 19 20
α-D-Glucosidase            
- Aspergillus niger n.i.b n.i.b 28% n.i.b 27% 29%
- Rhizopus mold 20% 21% 23% 20% 28% 27%
- Bac. stearotherm.b 9% n.i.b n.i.b 5% n.i.b 6%
β-D-Glucosidase n.i.b n.i.b 7% 11% 6% 19%
α-D-Mannosidase 5% n.i.b 16% 8% 10% 8%
α-L-Fucosidase 14% 13% n.i.b n.i.b n.i.b n.i.b

aSee text; bNo inhibition detected.

In summary, utilizing the readily available polyhydroxylated L-ido or D-manno-cyclooctenes, coming from ring closing metathesis of C2-symmetrical 1,9-dienes, we have accomplished the synthesis of a range of new hexa-substituted C8-glycomimetics in enantiopure form. Transformation of the cyclic double bond involved syn-dihydroxylation, then introduction of an azido group by opening of a cyclic sulfate followed by reduction and eventual alkylation of the resulting amine.

According to this strategy and to the nature of the ketones involved in the final reductive amination, various aminocyclitols could be synthesized. Thus, in this study two carbasugars and four aminocyclitols were obtained. Biological evaluation of these compounds towards 24 commercially available glycosidases have been carried out. For these C8-glycomimetics, weak activities were observed, which can probably be explained by a too high conformational flexibility of such structures.

Experimental

See Supporting Information File 1.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Additional information.
Format: DOC Size: 87.5 KB Download

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Pr P. Vogel and Ms C. Schuetz, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland, for their expertise in biological tests.

References

  1. Drinnan, N. B.; Vari, F. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2003, 3, 633–649. doi:10.2174/1389557033487737
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Peri, F. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2003, 3, 651–658. doi:10.2174/1389557033487700
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Fugedi, P. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2003, 3, 659–667. doi:10.2174/1389557033487755
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Houston, T. A.; Blanchfield, J. T. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2003, 3, 669–678. doi:10.2174/1389557033487827
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Chhabra, S. R.; Rahim, A. S.; Kellam, B. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2003, 3, 679–687. doi:10.2174/1389557033487791
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Lowary, T. L. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2003, 3, 689–702. doi:10.2174/1389557033487683
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Hurtley, S.; Service, R.; Szuromi, P. Science 2001, 291, 2337–2378. doi:10.1126/science.291.5512.2337
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Sears, P.; Wong, C. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2300–2324. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990816)38:16<2300::AID-ANIE2300>3.3.CO;2-Y
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Chapleur, Y. Carbohydrate Mimics: Concepts and Methods; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 1997.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Winchester, B.; Fleet, G. W. J. Glycobiology 1992, 2, 199–210. doi:10.1093/glycob/2.3.199
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Platt, F. M.; Niese, G. R.; Reinkensmeir, G.; Townsend, M. J.; Perry, V. H.; Proia, R. L.; Winchester, B.; Dwek, R. A.; Buters, T. D. Science 1997, 276, 428–431. doi:10.1126/science.276.5311.428
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Mooradian, A. D.; Thuman, J. E. Drugs 1999, 57, 19–29. doi:10.2165/00003495-199957010-00003
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Scott, L. J.; Spencer, C. M. Drugs 2000, 59, 521–549. doi:10.2165/00003495-200059030-00012
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Kameda, Y.; Asano, N.; Yoshikawa, M.; Takeuchi, M.; Yamaguchi, T.; Matsui, K.; Horii, S.; Fukase, H. J. Antibiot. 1984, 37, 1301–1307.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Horii, S.; Fukase, H.; Matsuo, T.; Kameda, Y.; Asano, N.; Matsui, K. J. Med. Chem. 1986, 29, 1038–1046. doi:10.1021/jm00156a023
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Chen, X.; Fan, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, Y. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1955–1977. doi:10.1021/cr0102260
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Truscheit, E.; Frommer, W.; Junge, B.; Müller, L.; Schmidt, D. D.; Wingender, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1981, 20, 744–761. doi:10.1002/anie.198107441
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Lillelund, V. H.; Jensen, H. H.; Liang, X.; Bols, M. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 515–533. doi:10.1021/cr000433k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Gravier-Pelletier, C.; Maton, W.; Dintinger, T.; Tellier, C.; Le Merrer, Y. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 8705–8720. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2003.09.049
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Marco-Contelles, J.; de Opazo, E. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3705–3717. doi:10.1021/jo0111107
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  21. Marco-Contelles, J.; de Opazo, E. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 65, 5416–5419. doi:10.1021/jo000110o
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Marco-Contelles, J.; de Opazo, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4445–4448. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(99)00769-8
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Johnson, C. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 333–341. doi:10.1021/ar970013q
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Mehta, G.; Pallavi, K. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2828–2829. doi:10.1039/b208918a
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  25. Wang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, H.; Blériot, Y.; Sinaÿ, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 1053–1059. doi:10.1002/1099-0690(200103)2001:6<1053::AID-EJOC1053>3.3.CO;2-J
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  26. van Hooft, P. A. V.; van der Marel, G. A.; van Boeckel, C. A. A.; van Boom, J. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 1769–1772. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)02318-2
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  27. Boyer, F. D.; Hanna, I.; Nolan, S. P. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4094–4096. doi:10.1021/jo0155761
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  28. Marco-Contelles, J.; de Opazo, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 5341–5345. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)00837-6
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  29. Wang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Sollogoub, M.; Sinaÿ, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2466–2467. doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20000717)39:14<2466::AID-ANIE2466>3.0.CO;2-U
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  30. Armbruster, J.; Stelzer, F.; Landenberger, P.; Wieber, C.; Hunkler, D.; Keller, M.; Prinzbach, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 5483–5487. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)00905-9
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  31. Andriuzzi, O.; Gravier-Pelletier, C.; Vogel, P.; Le Merrer, Y. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 7094–7104. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2005.05.066
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. McCort, I.; Sanière, M.; Le Merrer, Y. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 2693–2700. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(03)00257-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Andriuzzi, O.; Gravier-Pelletier, C.; Le Merrer, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 8043–8046. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.08.172
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Dougherty, J. M.; Probst, D. A.; Robinson, R. E.; Moore, J. D.; Klein, T. A.; Snelgrove, K. A.; Hanson, P. R. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 9781–9790. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(00)00885-1
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Barett, S.; O'Brien, P.; Steffens, H. C.; Towers, T. D.; Voith, M. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 9633–9640. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(00)00911-X
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Gao, Y.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7538. doi:10.1021/ja00230a045
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Moon Kim, B.; Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 655–659. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)80274-4
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. SHELXL97. Program for the refinement of crystal structures; University of Göttingen: Germany, 1997.
  39. Mattson, R. J.; Pham, K. M.; Leuck, D. J.; Cowen, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 2552–2554. doi:10.1021/jo00295a060
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Saul, R.; Chambers, J. P.; Molyneux, R. J.; Elbein, A. D. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1983, 221, 593–597. doi:10.1016/0003-9861(83)90181-9
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Brandi, A.; Cicchi, S.; Codero, F. M.; Frignoli, B.; Goti, A.; Picasso, S.; Vogel, P. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 6806–6812. doi:10.1021/jo00126a033
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities