Aromatic and heterocyclic perfluoroalkyl sulfides. Methods of preparation

  1. Vladimir N. Boiko

Institute of Organic Chemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Murmanskaya St. 5, 02094 Kiev, Ukraine

  1. Corresponding author email

Guest Editor: D. O’Hagan
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, 880–921. doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.88
Received 09 Mar 2010, Accepted 16 Jul 2010, Published 18 Aug 2010

Abstract

This review covers all of the common methods for the syntheses of aromatic and heterocyclic perfluoroalkyl sulfides, a class of compounds which is finding increasing application as starting materials for the preparation of agrochemicals, pharmaceutical products and, more generally, fine chemicals. A systematic approach is taken depending on the mode of incorporation of the SRF groups and also on the type of reagents used.

Keywords: halex-process; perfluoroalkylation; perfluoroalkyl sulfides; SRF-introduction

Review

1. Introduction

Perfluoroalkyl sulfides of aromatic and heterocyclic compounds have been an important aspect in the general development of organofluorine chemistry over the last twenty years.

Alkyl aryl sulfides containing partly fluorinated aliphatic moieties have been widely used for a number of years. Their methods of preparation, for example, by the reaction of thiols with fluoro-olefins or with chloropolyfluoroalkanes are well known and have been widely used. In contrast, sulfides with fully fluorinated aliphatic chains have been limited to trifluoromethylated compounds. This was due to the unique preparation (at that time) of such compounds by means of two consecutive reaction steps: the chlorination of the side chain followed by replacement of the chlorine atoms by fluorine. This procedure enabled only the preparation of CF3S-derivatives because it is not possible to synthesize perchloroalkylated aromatic sulfides larger than CCl3S. This is currently still the case. Iodoperfluoroalkanes as perfluoroalkylating agents have only emerged rather recently.

New synthetic procedures to access this class of compounds have appeared which make use of novel intermediates. Thus, single-electron oxidation or reduction enables the generation of perfluoroalkyl radicals. Two-electron reduction of perfluoroalkyl iodides generates perfluoroalkyl carbanions, which may be stabilized by organophosphorus and organosilicon ligands and even by dimethylformamide.

One of the driving forces for the synthesis of perfluoroalkyl sulphides is the high lipophilic properties of perfluoroalkylthio groups (the greatest Hansch constant π = 1.44, belongs to SCF3 group [1]), which increases the ability of such molecules to cross lipid membranes and creates opportunities for the modification of known and new drugs. Thus this group is a useful substituent in agrochemicals and pharmaceuticals [2-4]. Examples of bioactive compounds containing SCF3, SOCF3 and SO2CF3 groups are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2.

[1860-5397-6-88-1]

Figure 1: Examples of industrial fluorine-containing bio-active molecules.

[1860-5397-6-88-2]

Figure 2: CF3(S)- and CF3(O)-containing pharmacologically active compounds.

The synthesis of a large number of potential hypotensive agents containing SRF and SO2RF groups of the 1,4-dihydropyridine class and also of Losartan (Dup 753) analogues which are used clinically for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases have also been developed [5,6] (Figure 3).

[1860-5397-6-88-3]

Figure 3: Hypotensive candidates with SRF and SO2RF groups – analogues of Losartan and Nifedipin.

Other patented compounds containing perfluoroalkyl thio substituents are illustrated in Figure 4 and Figure 5 along with their pharmacological functions [7-11].

[1860-5397-6-88-4]

Figure 4: The variety of the pharmacological activity of RFS-substituted compounds.

[1860-5397-6-88-5]

Figure 5: Recent examples of compounds containing RFS(O)n-groups [12-18].

These examples represent only a small number of the vast array of organic compounds with SRF, SORF or SO2RF groups which display pharmacological activity and interest in such analogues continues to grow.

Previous reviews in this area are either dated [19] or focus on specialist aspects such as perfluoroalkyl radicals [20-22], fluorinated carbanions [23], organometallic compounds [24,25], perfluoroalkyl sulfenyl halides [26], perfluoroalkyl silicon reagents [27-32], the trifluoromethylthio anion [29] or electrophilic perfluoroalkylating agents [33]. Others are devoted to particular methods such as trifluoromethylation initiated by sodium dithionite [34] or the electrochemical introduction of fluoroalkyl groups in organic molecules [35]. Moreover, many of the reviews on the subject are very general [28,30,32,36].

The present work reviews synthetic methods employed to prepare aromatic and heterocyclic perfluoroalkyl sulfides and is systematized depending on the mode of constructing the SRF groups and also on the nature of the starting materials.

  1. The halogenation of SAlk-derivatives with subsequent replacement of the halogen atoms by fluorine.
  2. The introduction of SRF-moieties into aromatic compounds by both electrophilic and nucleophilic reagents.
  3. Various modes of perfluoroalkylation of organosulfur compounds including cationic, anionic, radical and ion-radical variants.

2. Substitution of halogen atoms by fluorine in aryl-α-polyhalogenoalkyl sulfides

Substitution of the halogen atoms in SAlkHlg groups (mainly chlorine) using antimony trifluoride [37], is the oldest method of perfluoroalkylsulfide preparation and is still commercially significant.

The reaction is carried out by heating a mixture of aryl trichloromethyl sulfide with an excess of SbF3 in the absence of a solvent. For industrial processes, dry hydrogen fluoride is used as the fluorinating agent (Scheme 1).

[1860-5397-6-88-i1]

Scheme 1: Fluorination of ArSCCl3 to corresponding ArSCF3 derivatives. For references see: a[38-43]; b[41,42]; c[43]; d[44]; e[38-43,45-47]; f[38-43,48,49]; g[49,50]; h[51]; i[52]; j[53]; k[54].

The presence of halogen atoms and electron-withdrawing groups such as NO2, CF3 or COCl in the aromatic ring of trichlorothioanisole does not influence the fluorination and the reaction is not hindered by bulky ortho-substituents e.g., phthalic acid imide [53] or N-substituted anilines [54]. Other reactive substituents, for example 3-SCCl3 or 4-COCl are also fluorinated and form 1,3-bis(SCF3) benzene [38-40] and 4-SCF3-benzoic acid fluoride, respectively [55].

The use of hydrogen fluoride has some advantages. Due to its low boiling point (+19.4 °C) and good solubility in water, excess HF is easily removed from the reaction mixture. Unlike HF, reactions with SbF3 can be carried out in glass. The SbF3 must be freshly sublimed and used in a corrosion-proof vessel. Attempts to use less aggressive fluoride ion sources, e.g., KF/18-Crown-6 in CH3CN or KF/Bu4N+ Cl under phase-transfer conditions, have been unsuccessful [56].

The method does not give access to longer perfluoroalkyl sulfides because the required aryl perchloroalkyl sulfide precursors are not easily accessible [57,58]. However, pentafluoroethyl ethers of various thiophenols (or phenols) can be obtained by the more sequential process as shown in Scheme 2 [59].

[1860-5397-6-88-i2]

Scheme 2: Preparation of aryl pentafluoroethyl sulfides.

Use of mixed (Cl/F) polyhalogenofluoro alkanes as partial fluorinated alkylating agents generates the corresponding sulfides which are appropriate precursors for subsequent conversion to perfluoroalkyl thioethers. For example, α,α-difluoro polyhalogenoalkyl sulfides and α,α-dichlorotrifluoroethyl sulfide can be obtained by reaction of thiophenols with dihalogenodifluoro methanes [60-62], per(halogenofluoro) ethanes [60,63,64] and 2,2,2-trifluorotrichloroethane.

The Cl- and Br-substituents can then be replaced by fluorine without use of HF or SbF3 [61]. As shown in Scheme 3 [65], bromine to fluorine exchange is possible by the use of other heavy metal fluorides, and even by silver tetrafluoroborate under mild conditions.

[1860-5397-6-88-i3]

Scheme 3: Mild fluorination of the aryl SCF2Br derivatives.

The halex-method allows the selective preparation of α,α-difluoroalkyl aryl sulfides (and also ethers, sulfoxides and sulfones) as intermediate products in the synthesis of herbicides [66,67]. Interestingly, the reaction of anhydrous hydrogen fluoride with aryl α,α,β-trichloroisobutyl sulfide at 20 °C leads only to substitution of the α-chlorine atoms, whilst at a higher temperature and pressure a more complete fluorination with rearrangement is observed [67] (Scheme 4).

[1860-5397-6-88-i4]

Scheme 4: HF fluorinations of aryl α,α,β-trichloroisobutyl sulfide at various conditions.

Hydrogen fluoride/fluoride complexes such as H2F3 stabilized on a polymer [68] show even greater selectivity. For example, only one chlorine atom of the α,α-dichloromethylene group of benzyl alkyl sulfide is substituted by the reagent (Scheme 5).

[1860-5397-6-88-i5]

Scheme 5: Monofluorination of α,α-dichloromethylene group.

Thus, halogen atoms replacement by fluorine is an effective and cheap method for preparing aromatic and heterocyclic perfluoroalkyl sulfides. Application of the appropriate conditions allows control and a degree of selectivity thus making this method an important industrial process.

3. Introduction of the aryl SRF moiety

3.1. Electrophilic introduction of SRF groups

Perfluoroalkyl sulfenyl chlorides react with electron rich aromatic and heterocyclic compounds, to give SRF derivatives. Thus, phenol, o-hydroquinone and their derivatives react with CF3SCl to yield p-hydroxyaryl trifluoromethyl sulfides (Scheme 6).

[1860-5397-6-88-i6]

Scheme 6: Electrophilic substitution of phenols with CF3SCl [69].

The best yields are achieved when electron-donating substituents are present on the ring. In the case of m-cresol and m-chlorophenol a small degree of o-substitution was observed. Phenol is a poor substrate in the reaction (Scheme 6) however, when FeCl3 was used as a catalyst the yield of p-HOC6H4SCF3 was increased, albeit only slightly (30%). A significant improvement in yield occurs (72%) when the reaction is conducted with pyridine in chloroform and at ambient temperatures (0–20 °C) [70,71]. Under these conditions and with electron-donating substituents in the phenol, two and even three perfluoroalkylthio groups can be introduced (Scheme 7).

[1860-5397-6-88-i7]

Scheme 7: Introduction of SCF3 groups into activated phenols [71-74].

Forcing conditions are required for the introduction of three CF3S-groups. This can be achieved either by activation with iron powder under pressure (or by conduction the reaction in a steel autoclave) or by the presence of two donor groups in meta-positions [71].

For p-hydroquinone, reaction with CF3SCl in the presence of pyridine results only in the formation of a chlorohydroquinone pyridinium species [72], and neutral conditions are required in this case [69]. For the synthesis of poly(SCF3) substituted p-hydroquinones, Scribner oxidized 2,6-bis(SCF3)-4-methoxyphenol to generate 2,6-bis(SCF3)-1,4-benzoquinone. The addition of CF3SH in the presence of pyridine to the bis-compound gave 2,3,5-tris(SCF3)hydroquinone [72] which could be subsequently converted into tetrakis(SCF3)-1,4-hydroquinone (Scheme 8).

[1860-5397-6-88-i8]

Scheme 8: Preparation of tetrakis(SCF3)-4-methoxyphenol [72].

Unlike p-hydroquinone, resorcinols and phloroglucinols perhaps surprisingly react with RFSCl [75] to generate monoperfluoroalkyl thio derivatives. With iron powder as a catalyst bis(SRF)-derivatives can be obtained (Scheme 9).

[1860-5397-6-88-i9]

Scheme 9: The interactions of resorcinol and phloroglucinol derivatives with RFSCl.

Similarly, methyl benzoates and benzaldehydes with two and especially three hydroxyl groups form bis(CF3S)-substituted derivatives without of catalyst.

Analogous reactions are observed with aniline. However, since reaction takes place in the first instance on the amino group [74,76], for the introduction of SCF3 group into the aromatic ring the amino function must be protected. Mono-N-substitution is insufficient: N-methyl aniline, N-(SCF3)aniline and N(Ac)-m-toluidine all yield mainly N-(SCF3)-derivatives, and only a small amount of aromatic CF3S-substitution is observed [74]. The best results are achieved [70,74] with N,N-bis-substituted aniline (Scheme 10).

[1860-5397-6-88-i10]

Scheme 10: Reactions of anilines with CF3SCl.

The introduction of strong electron-donating meta groups significantly activates the aromatic nuclei not only for N,N-bis-substituted anilines but also for N-monosubstituted substrates and even those with a free NH2 group (Scheme 11).

[1860-5397-6-88-i11]

Scheme 11: Trifluoromethylsulfanylation of anilines with electron-donating groups in the meta position [74].

In naphthalene and benzophenone derivatives only those rings containing hydroxy or amino groups undergo perfluoroalkylsulfanylation [74,75]. Other electron-donating substituents on the aromatic ring are not so activating for reaction with CF3SCl. For example, thiophenol [76] forms only phenyltrifluoromethyl disulfide [70]. The presence of a methyl group and halogens requires high temperatures (100–200 °C) and the presence of catalysts (HF or BF3) for reaction and yields of the corresponding aryltrifluoromethyl sulfides are only 25–60%. Both toluene and halobenzenes lead to mixtures of isomers [70].

Benzene undergoes trifluoromethylsulfanylation with trifluoromethanesulfonic acid as a catalyst even at 20 °C. However, further reaction of the resultant phenyltrifluoromethyl sulfide leads mainly to chlorination with only minor amounts of bis-(CF3S) products (Scheme 12).

[1860-5397-6-88-i12]

Scheme 12: Reaction of benzene with CF3SCl/CF3SO3H [77].

Aryl magnesium [78] and -mercury [79] compounds have been employed for the introduction of CF3S groups. Such reactions proceed in ether or THF at low temperatures; however, the yields of aryltrifluoromethyl sulfides do not exceed 50–60% and are accompanied with halogenated side-products (Scheme 13).

[1860-5397-6-88-i13]

Scheme 13: Reactions of trifluoromethyl sulfenyl chloride with aryl magnesium and -mercury substrates.

Among heterocyclic systems, pyrroles are the best substrates for reaction with trifluoromethyl-, difluorochloro- and dichlorofluoromethyl sulfenyl chlorides. Their reactivity exceeds that of benzene and its organometallic derivatives [80]. An excess of reagent gives bis-(SCF3) pyrrole derivatives as shown in Scheme 14.

[1860-5397-6-88-i14]

Scheme 14: Reactions of pyrroles with CF3SCl.

Condensed pyrroles also react readily with CF3SCl. Indole undergoes substitution, as expected, at the 3-position [80], while indolizine and some of its derivatives give 1,3-bis (SCF3)-substituted products, in some cases, in quantitative yield [81]. It is interesting to note that not only hydrogen, but also an acetyl group in the 1-position is substituted (Scheme 15).

[1860-5397-6-88-i15]

Scheme 15: Trifluoromethylsulfanylation of indole and indolizines.

However, no reaction occurs when there are two electron-withdrawing groups in the five-membered indolizine ring (e.g. R = Ph, and X = COPh or NO2). By contrast, in the case of 1-benzyl-2-methyl indolizine [81] both the pyrrole and the aromatic ring of the benzyl group undergo trifluoromethylsulfanylation. Only N-substitution occurs in the case of carbazole [80].

N-Methylpyrrole can be variously substituted depending on the conditions as illustrated in Scheme 16.

[1860-5397-6-88-i16]

Scheme 16: Reactions of N-methylpyrrole with CF3SCl [80,82].

Heating N-methylpyrrole in CHCl3/Py affords the 2-SCF3 derivative along with a small amount of 3-SCF3-N-methylpyrrole [83]. Attempted selective introduction of the second SCF3 group at −30 °C with C4F9SO3H to 2-trifluoromethylsulfanylpyrrole was unsuccessful and gave a mixture of 2,4- and 2,5-isomers [87].

Unlike pyrroles, furan, thiophene and selenophene react with CF3SCl only in the presence of catalysts. For selenophene [84] and thiophenes [85] SnCl4 is sufficient, whilst furans require more forcing conditions usually involving prolonged heating (20 h at 60 °C) and in pyridine for activation [83,84] (Scheme 17).

[1860-5397-6-88-i17]

Scheme 17: Reactions of furan, thiophene and selenophene with CF3SCl.

Similarly, some five membered heterocycles with two heteroatoms [N-Ac- and N-(SO2Alk)-thiazoles, 1-Me-2-SCH2CF3- and 1,2-Me2-imidazoles] undergo single trifluoromethylsulfanylation on heating (60 °C) with CF3SCl in a pyridine-chloroform mixture [83]. Interestingly, unlike 1,2-dimethylimidazole, the sulfanylation of 2,4-dimethylthiazole under the same conditions occurs twice on the same 2-methyl group (Scheme 18).

[1860-5397-6-88-i18]

Scheme 18: Trifluoromethylsulfanylation of imidazole and thiazole derivatives [83].

Pyridine is too deactivated for trifluoromethylsulfanylation under classical conditions and to achieve substitution it is first of all necessary to convert pyridine to an anionic hydride σ-complex by reduction with LiAlH4 [86]. The reaction with CF3SCl then proceeds with difficulty [84] and mono-substituted 3-trifluoromethylsulfanyl pyridine is formed in low yield along with small amounts of the 3,5-bis(SCF3) derivative (~1%) (Scheme 19).

[1860-5397-6-88-i19]

Scheme 19: Trifluoromethylsulfanylation of pyridine requires initial hydride reduction.

Introduction of additional RFS-groups into heterocyclic compounds (except for pyrrole and its derivatives) occurs in the presence of perfluoroalkanesulfonic acids (Scheme 20). Incorporation of the second fluoroalkylsulfanyl group into thiophenes [85] and selenophene [84] is possible in the presence of CF3SO3H. However, reaction of CF3SCl with 2,5-bis(SCF3) thiophene in presence of CF3SO3H gives the 3-chloro-derivative as the major product. 2,3,5-Tris(SCF3) thiophene is accessible if CF3SO3H is added as its Ag-salt [77]. Such reactions can also be successfully carried out on pyrroles (Scheme 21).

[1860-5397-6-88-i20]

Scheme 20: Introduction of additional RFS-groups into heterocyclic compounds in the presence of CF3SO3H.

[1860-5397-6-88-i21]

Scheme 21: Introduction of additional RFS-groups into pyrroles [82,87].

Prolonged reaction times lead to chlorinated products as well as products that arise from migration of the CF3S-groups (Scheme 22).

[1860-5397-6-88-i22]

Scheme 22: By-products in reactions of pyrroles with CF3SCl [82].

Thus, the reaction of perfluoroalkanesulfenyl chlorides with electron-rich aromatic and heterocyclic compounds offers an effective and comparatively straightforward method for the introduction of one or more SRF groups. The reactions are more problematic however, for electron deficient substrates where competing halogenation, reduction and isomerization products often result from perfluoroalkylthiolation reactions.

3.2. Nucleophilic introduction of SRF groups

Anionic salts of type RFS M+ and their heavy metal complexes have been known for many years [88], however their application to the synthesis of aromatic perfluoroalkyl sulfides is comparatively recent. For example, trifluoromethylthiomercury and trifluoromethylthiosilver react with aliphatic halogenides to generate aliphatic and benzylic trifluoromethyl sulfides [89-92].

It is well known that the reaction of non-activated aryl halides with phenols, thiophenols and amines are catalyzed effectively by copper (Ullmann reaction). L. M. Yagupol’skii [93-97] developed a related protocol for trifluoromethylsulfanylation of aromatic and heterocyclic compounds using trifluoromethylthiocopper (Scheme 23).

[1860-5397-6-88-i23]

Scheme 23: Reaction of aromatic iodides with CuSCF3 [93,95].

The reaction is carried out by heating in a polar solvent (e.g. DMF, quinoline or N-methyl pyrrolidone) and the substrate can contain electron-donating or electron-withdrawing groups. Electron-withdrawing groups activate the iodo atom and consequently, give better yields (70–75%). 2-Trifluoromethylsulfanylpyridine, 6-trifluoromethylsulfanylquinoline [93] and 1-trifluoromethylsulfanylnaphthalene [97] are obtained in good yields (60–70%) by this method. Multiple aromatic iodine substituents result in multiple substitution by SCF3 (Scheme 24).

[1860-5397-6-88-i24]

Scheme 24: Reaction of aromatic iodides with RFZCu (Z = S, Se), RF = CF3, C6F5 [93,95,96].

In the cases of triiodo derivatives, the yields generally do not exceed 30%. Thus, the synthesis of 1,3,5-tris(SCF3)benzene is more efficient via 3,5-bis(SCF3)-iodobenzene [93]. Hexaiodobenzene reacts with CuSCF3 to form hexakis(trifluoromethylsulfanyl)benzene in modest yield (41%). However, with CuSC6F5 and CuSeCF3 the corresponding hexa-substituted thio- and seleno-derivatives are obtained in yields of 70–90% [96].

It should be noted that the interaction of CuSCF3 with aromatic iodides is sometimes accompanied by side-reactions. For example, the introduction of CF3S groups into 2,6-diiodo-4-nitrochlorobenzene and 2,6-diiodo-4-nitroanisole involve simultaneous reduction and substitution (Scheme 25).

[1860-5397-6-88-i25]

Scheme 25: Side reactions during trifluoromethylsulfanylation of aromatic iodides with CF3SCu [98].

Trifluoromethylthiocopper is obtained by reaction of CuBr with AgSCF3 [93,99], the latter is generated from silver fluoride and carbon disulfide [90,100].

To simplify the process, Remy [101,102] suggested carrying out the synthesis of aryltrifluoromethyl sulfides by generation CuSCF3 (from trifluoromethylthio mercury and -copper) in situ with the aryl halides. This not only reduces the number of steps but also increases the overall efficiency (Scheme 26).

[1860-5397-6-88-i26]

Scheme 26: Reactions with in situ generated CuSCF3.

Aryl bromides can also be used but require higher temperatures (150–190 °C) and more polar solvents. Under such forcing conditions compounds containing both electron-withdrawing and electron-donating groups can now be used effectively. In the case of p-bromo-N,N–dimethylaniline an excess (3 equiv) of the reagent was used. Aromatic chlorides do not react under these conditions. Thus, this method allows the selective substitution of different halogens by varying the temperature.

Since the original work on trifluoromethylthiocopper and trifluoromethylthiomercury [93,95,96,101,102], other nucleophilic reagents and new methods have been developed. For example, Clark et al. have used CuSCF3 adsorbed onto Al2O3 [100], whilst Munavalli et al. have employed the acetonitrile adduct CF3SCu·CH3CN [103] for the reaction with m-iodobenzoic acid and its methyl ester [104].

Bulky perfluoroalkylthiocopper reagents, derived from 2,2,4,4-tetrakis(CF3)-1,3-dithietane, hexafluoropropene and alcohols in the presence of KF or CuBr, have been also used for reaction with substituted iodobenzenes (Scheme 27).

[1860-5397-6-88-i27]

Scheme 27: Perfluoroalkylthiolation of aryl iodides with bulky RFSCu [105].

A variety of perfluoroalkyl- and perfluoroarylcopper mercaptides and selenides have become more accessible, prepared by cleavage of the corresponding disulfides and diselenides with copper powder [94]. The resultant RFZCu reagents complexed with DMF or N-methylpyrrolidone, are quite stable and can be stored without decomposition, can be used for the production of aryltrifluoromethyl-, arylpentafluorophenyl sulfides and -selenides from the corresponding iodobenzenes (Scheme 28) [94].

[1860-5397-6-88-i28]

Scheme 28: In situ formation and reaction of RFZCu with aryl iodides.

The compounds shown in Figure 6 have been synthesized by this method.

[1860-5397-6-88-6]

Figure 6: Examples of compounds obtained using in situ generated RFZCu methodology [94].

An alternative approach for the generation of CF3SCu involves heating of methyl fluorosulfonyl difluoroacetate in polar aprotic solvents to generate difluorocarbene, which in the presence of CuI and sulfur, forms trifluoromethylthiocopper [106]. Subsequent reaction with aryl halides results in the corresponding trifluoromethylsulfanyl derivatives (Scheme 29).

[1860-5397-6-88-i29]

Scheme 29: Introduction of SCF3 group into aromatics via difluorocarbene.

Reduction of bis(perfluoroalkyl)disulfides with tetrakis(dimethylamino)ethylene produces tetrakis(dimethylamino)ethylene dication stabilized perfluoroalkyl thiolates. In contrast to the corresponding potassium and tetramethylammonium salts [29], this compound is stable and can be isolated in a pure state [107], and reacts with activated aryl halides to form the corresponding trifluoromethyl sulfides often in quantitative yields (Scheme 30).

[1860-5397-6-88-i30]

Scheme 30: Tetrakis(dimethylamino)ethylene dication trifluoromethyl thiolate as a stable reagent for substitution of aromatic halides.

Dmowski and Haas used the reaction of thiocarbonyl difluoride with metal fluorides, to generate the trifluoromethylthiolate anion [108] for introduction into activated perfluoroheterocyclic compounds. Thus, reaction of CF2S/CsF with pentafluoropyridine under mild conditions gave the 4-substituted product [109]. However, for the subsequent introduction of additional SCF3 groups this system is not suitable due to effective self-condensation of thiocarbonyl difluoride (CF2=S) at higher concentrations. For this purpose the trimer of thiocarbonyl difluoride, bis(trifluoromethyl)trithiocarbonate (CF3S)2C=S, is more stable and reacts with CsF in sulfolane to generate CF3S anions [110]. However, the use of this reagent leads to mixtures of products (Scheme 31).

[1860-5397-6-88-i31]

Scheme 31: The use of CF2=S/CsF or (CF3S)2C=S/CsF for the introduction of CF3S groups into fluorinated heterocycles.

Whilst reaction of CF2=S/CsF (or its trimer) with tetrafluoropyridazine allows for the selective formation of mono-, di- and tri-(SCF3) substituted products, the analogous reaction with tetrafluoropyrimidine results in a mixture of polyfluoropyrimidine derivatives [111] (Scheme 31). Interestingly, the reaction of (CF3S)2C=S/CsF with C,N-bis(pentafluorophenyl) imidoyl chloride leads to introduction of the SCF3 group into the pentafluorophenyl ring along with substitution of the imidoylic chlorine atom [112].

A considerable improvement of this method was developed by Clark et al. [113]: No preliminary preparation of difluorothiophosgene or its trimer is necessary, the required reagents being generated in situ (from thiophosgene and KF). The reaction with activated aromatic compounds is shown in Scheme 32.

[1860-5397-6-88-i32]

Scheme 32: One-pot synthesis of ArSCF3 from ArX, CCl2=S and KF.

The less reactive 2-Cl-5-NO2 benzonitrile forms the CF3S-derivative in only 49% yield after many hours reflux and 2-F-5-NO2 benzonitrile is a by-product despite the use of a 100% excess of thiophosgene.

The use of Me4NF in place of KF for the generation of the CF3S anion in reactions with 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene and pentafluoropyridine increases the yields of the corresponding trifluoromethyl sulfides to 90–96% [29,114]. However, with other substrates this method can be problematic due to competing side reactions.

A new method for the preparation of trifluoromethylthiolate anion involves the reaction of Me3SiCF3 with sulfur in the presence of a fluoride ion source [115]. The salts obtained by this method are considerably more thermally stable than those previously reported [29,110,114]. They can be treated with boiling ether or CS2 to remove excess sulfur and readily react at room temperature with inorganic, aliphatic and activated aromatic halides with the formation of trifluoromethyl sulfides (Scheme 33).

[1860-5397-6-88-i33]

Scheme 33: Reaction of aromatics with CF3S Kat+ [115].

It has already been noted that trifluoromethylthiomercury and trifluoromethylthiosilver cannot be used for the preparation of aryltrifluoromethyl sulfides, as they react only with aliphatic halides [89-92]. However, it is known [116,117], that Hg(SCF3)2 forms a complex with KI which decomposes with the formation of an unstable anion “SCF3”. Based on this observation, Adams and Clark used a mixture of trifluoromethylthiosilver and KI (or Bu4NI) as a source of trifluoromethylthiolate anion for nucleophilic introduction of the trifluoromethylsulfanyl moiety into aromatic molecules [118]. Of the metal halides investigated for this reaction, the best results were obtained with KI and Bu4NI, whilst NaI, NaBr, and KF were ineffective. Some of these reactions are illustrated in Scheme 34.

[1860-5397-6-88-i34]

Scheme 34: Reactions of activated aromatic chlorides with AgSCF3/KI.

This reagent can displace a range of activated halides, particularly bromides and iodides. For the reaction of 2,4-(NO2)2C6H3X with AgSCF3/KI, the reactivity of the halogens occurs in the reverse sequence: F (26%) < Cl (52%) < Br (85%) < I (97%) [118]. Presumably, coordination of the complex anionic nucleophile K+[Ag(SCF3)I] with aryl halide accelerates the reaction.

Trifluoromethylthiocopper and trifluoromethylthiomercury also participate in analogous reactions, CuSCF3 is less active than AgSCF3 whilst Hg(SCF3)2 displays increased reactivity as indicated in Scheme 35 [118].

[1860-5397-6-88-i35]

Scheme 35: Comparative CuSCF3/KI and Hg(SCF3)2/KI reactions.

It should be noted that the tellurium reagent, Me3SnTeCF3, is capable of introducing the TeCF3 group into activated heteroaromatics [119]. In the reaction shown (Scheme 36) the use of three equivalents resulted in the introduction of only two TeCF3 groups.

[1860-5397-6-88-i36]

Scheme 36: Me3SnTeCF3 – a reagent for the introduction of the TeCF3 group.

The Sandmeyer reaction is used widely to introduce functionality into aromatic compounds. However, early attempts using trifluoromethylthiosilver as the nucleophile were not encouraging [120] with yields below 30% accompanied with deaminated side products (up to 38%). The use of trifluoromethylthiocopper was rather unsuccessful. However, with diazonium salts generated with tert-butyl nitrite in acetonitrile in the presence of CuSCF3 and BF3 better results were obtained [121]. Yields of the resulting aryltrifluoromethyl sulfides improved (~40–70%). The best results were observed with isolated tetrafluoroborate diazonium salts (Scheme 37), although the presence of electron-donating and bulky ortho-substituents in the aromatic ring led to reduced yields.

[1860-5397-6-88-i37]

Scheme 37: Sandmeyer reactions with CuSCF3.

4. Perfluoroalkylation of aromatic sulfur compounds

Perfluoroalkyl iodides have not generally been considered as alkylating agents. Unlike R-X they show anomalous behavior in their reactions with nucleophiles. For example, the reaction of CF3I with alkali gives fluoroform (CHF3) and potassium hypoiodide (KIO) [122]. The interaction of organolithium compounds with perfluoroalkyl iodides [123-126] does not result in combination of the two alkyl species (RF and R), but in trans-metallation (Scheme 38).

[1860-5397-6-88-i38]

Scheme 38: Reactions of perfluoroalkyl iodides with alkali and organolithium reagents.

Such reactivity has been explained by the reverse polarization of the C–I bond in the fluorinated substrates. Because of the greater electronegativity of CF3 over iodine (3.3 for CF3 and 2.5 for the atom of iodine [127,128]), the iodine acquires a partial positive charge:

[Graphic 1]

Nevertheless, Haszeldine et al., were able to carry out the perfluoroalkylations of alkylthiols. Prolonged heating of polyfluoroalkyl iodides with the sodium methylthiolate at 100–110 °C in DMSO lead to the formation of methyl polyfluoroalkyl sulfides [129]. The halophilic generated carbanion (RF) in turn reacted with the sulfenyl iodide to generate a thioether. However, RFCH3 and RFH, are also obtained as by-products, which may be a result of homolytic decomposition of the perfluoroalkyl iodides at high temperature [130,131]. Similarly, reactions of RFI with sodium thiophenoxide (like other aromatics such as halogenated benzenes [132] or aromatic heterocycles [133]) resulted in the introduction of the perfluoroalkyl radical into aromatic rings with the formation of a mixture of isomeric RF-compounds.

4.1. Ion-radical perfluoroalkylation

4.1.1. Interaction of S-, Se- and Te-phenols, and diaryl disulfides with perfluoroalkyl iodides in liquid ammonia under UV irradiation

Kornblum’s work on nucleophilic substitution in alkyl halides [134-137] and Bunnett’s reactions with non-activated aromatic substrates [138-142] (under UV irradiation) introduced the concept of the nucleophilic radical substitution mechanism (SRN1). The essence of this approach consists of the generation of the anionic radical RHlg−•, its decomposition to a radical R (Alk or Ar) followed by reaction with a nucleophile.

Although perfluoroalkyl iodides have a reversed polarity, and in spite of their tendency to undergo homolytic decomposition under UV irradiation, it is probable that they are also able to react with thiolate anions by a similar mechanism. Indeed, they react readily with aliphatic, aromatic and heterocyclic thiols [143-146], and with seleno- [147] and tellurophenols [148] under UV irradiation with formation of corresponding perfluoroalkyl sulfides, -selenides and -tellurides. The original method required liquid ammonia as the solvent and Pyrex glassware. Thiophenol and its derivatives containing both, electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents are easily transformed to the corresponding arylperfluoroalkyl sulfides in high yields (Table 1).

Table 1: Interaction of thiophenols with perfluoroalkyl iodides in liquid ammonia under UV irradiation.

[Graphic 2]
R RF Yields of ArSRF, % Ref.
H CF3 76 [143]
  C2F5, n-C3F7, iso-C3F7 84, 81, 76 [144]
4-NH2 CF3 87 [146]
2-NH2 CF3 71 [143]
4-OH CF3 69.5 [143]
2-OCH3 CF3 86 [98]
4-Cl CF3 72 [146]
  C2F5, n-C3F7, iso-C3F7 84, 83, 65 [144]
2-SO2CHF2 CF3 69 [143,146]
4-SO2CF3 CF3 78 [143,146]
4-NO2 CF3 2.7a [143,146]
    63b [143,146]
2,4-Cl2 CF3 87 [149]
  C3F7 89 [149]
2-COOH CF3 90 [150]
3- and 4-COOCH3 CF3, n-C3F7, iso-C3F7 70–80 [151]
3- and 4-F CF3, n-C3F7 80–90 [152]
  iso-C3F7 72–75 [152]
4-NHCOCH3 CF3 96 [153]
4-NHCOOCH3 CF3, n-C3F7 88 (92c), 82 (93c) [9]
  C2F5, C4F9 62, 55 [154]

aIn a quartz flask.
bIn a quartz ampoule at 30–45 °C.
cWith preliminary reduction of 4,4′-bis(MeOCONH)diaryl disulfide and without the isolation of corresponding thiophenol.

α,ω-Diiodoperfluoroalkanes react at both reaction centers with the formation of bis(SAr)–derivatives containing perfluoroalkylene bridges [144,146] in yields of 80–96%.

With the exception of 4-nitrothiophenol, the reactions are independent of the type of substituents. Unlike many thiophenoxides which bear electron-withdrawing substituents (p-Cl, 2,4-Cl2, o-SO2CHF2 and even p-SO2CF3), sodium 4-nitrothiophenoxide affords 4,4′-dinitrodiphenyl disulfide under these conditions. Conversion to 4-nitrophenyl trifluoromethyl sulfide (60% yield) requires prolonged irradiation in a quartz ampoule at 30–45 °C [143]. The length of the perfluoroalkyl iodide chain has no influence, although lower yields were observed using CF3I in comparison with other iodoperfluoroalkanes. A branching RFI chain results in lower yields of the corresponding sulfides (10–15%). In the case of tertiary perfluorobutyl iodide, thiophenols are quantitatively transformed into diaryl disulfides. Such behavior of branched perfluoroalkyl iodides can be explained by the facile generation of the I radical both as a consequence of their homolytic decomposition [155] and the decomposition of in situ generated radical anions [156]: i-RFI−•i-RF + I. The radical I (or I2) oxidizes the ArS anion to disulfide.

Diaryl disulfides may also be used as substrates. Although they can be trifluoromethylated directly [157], unlike dialkyl disulfides [130,131] the yields generally do not exceed 40% (except for nitro derivatives 4-NO2 – 58%, 2-NO2 – 72%). The preliminary breaking of the S–S bond can be carried out very mildly and selectively [9], without affecting other functional groups (Scheme 39).

[1860-5397-6-88-i39]

Scheme 39: Perfluoroalkylation with preliminary breaking of the disulfide bond.

Perfluoroalkylthioanilines are accessible in a one-pot perfluoroalkylation reaction of dinitrodiphenyl disulfides [158,159] (Scheme 40). This method gives good yields of the desired products, higher than those from the perfluoroalkylation of amino thiophenols.

[1860-5397-6-88-i40]

Scheme 40: Preparation of RFS-substituted anilines from dinitrodiphenyl disulfides.

Seleno- [147] and telluro phenols [148] also react with perfluoroalkyl iodides under UV irradiation. Subsequently, it was shown that ArSeNa and ArTeNa react with perfluoroalkyl halides without irradiation to generate RF radicals which react with olefins [160,161]. Irradiation of polymercapto derivatives of benzene and CF3I in liquid ammonia gives poly(trifluoromethylsulfanyl) compounds in high yields (Table 2).

Table 2: UV irradiation of polymercapto benzenes with CF3I in liquid NH3.

[Graphic 3]
R Position of (SH)n and (SCF3)n Yield Ref.
Cl 2,4- 64% [143]
COOH 3,5- 89% [162]
CH3 2,4,6- 90% [163]
NH2 2,4,6- 88% [163]
OH 2,4,6- 69% [163]

However, the reaction of 2,4,6-trimercaptochlorobenzene with CF3I generates a mixture of compounds A, B, C and D as illustrated in Scheme 41. Reducing the irradiation time from 30 to 5 min does not change the product composition.

Control experiments indicate that aniline (B) is not derived from either chloro- (A) and iodo- (C)-sulfides, and iodo-product (C) is not formed from chlorosulfide (A). It is known [164] that photochemical nucleophilic aromatic substitution is promoted by electron-donating groups. Therefore, it appears most likely that the sulfides (B), (C) and (D) are produced as a consequence of loss of chloride from the intermediate radical anion as shown in Scheme 42.

[1860-5397-6-88-i41]

Scheme 41: Photochemical trifluoromethylation of 2,4,6-trimercaptochlorobenzene [163].

[1860-5397-6-88-i42]

Scheme 42: Putative process for the formation of B, C and D.

Such side reactions explain the decrease of trifluoromethylation efficiency with the number of thiol groups present in a series of thiolated chlorobenzenes. The yields are 72% for 4-SH- [146], 64% for 2,4-(SH)2- [143] and 37% for 2,4,6-(SH)3- [163].

4.1.2. Perfluoroalkylation of heterocyclic thiols

Heterocyclic thiol form S-perfluoroalkyl derivatives when irradiated in liquid ammonia in the presence of iodoperfluoroalkanes. The type of heterocyclic ring and the position of the thiol group influences the reaction. More electron-deficient heterocycles require longer irradiation times (Table 3).

Table 3: S-Perfluoroalkylation of heterocyclic compounds under UV irradiation of heterocycles thiols R-Het-SH in liquid ammonia.

R RF Reaction conditions Yield of products, % Ref.
2-(SCF3)-Benzothiazole
H CF3 −60 to −33 °C, 90 min 87.5 [143]
2-(SRF)-Benzimidazoles
H CF3 −50 to −33 °C, 4 h 51 [165]
  C1–C4 Pyrex ampoule, 30 °C, 5 h 63–80 [154]
5-Cl C2F5 liquid NH3, THF, 10 h 56 [166]
5-(SRF)-Benzimidazolesa
2-Bu CF3 liquid NH3, ampoule, 25–40 °C, 10 h 20–39 [154]
  C3F7      
5-(SRF)-6-Azauracil
H CF3 −33 °C, 45 min 77 [10]
  C3F7   76  
2-(SCF3)-Pyrimidines
4,6-(CH3)2 CF3 −33 °C, 60 min 82 [154]
4-SH CF3   61b [154]
4-SH-6-CH3 CF3   58b [154]
4-OH-6-CF3 CF3 Pyrex ampoule, 30–45 °C, 5 h 59 [154]
4,6-Me2-5-OH CF3 −30 °C, 4 h, 89 [154]

aReceived from 5-SZn salts, poorly soluble in liquid ammonia.
bThe 2,4-bis(SCF3)-derivatives.

It appears that 4-hydroxypyrimidine-2-thiol does not react with CF3I under standard conditions. Similar to the reaction of 4-nitrothiophenol noted above [143,146], this reaction requires more forcing conditions. Other 4-hydroxypyrimidine-2-thiols behave similarly. The irradiation of an ammoniacal solution of 2-mercapto-4-oxy-6-trifluoromethylyrimidine with CF3I must be conducted in a Pyrex ampoule at 30–45 °C to produce the S-trifluoromethyl derivative (Scheme 43).

[1860-5397-6-88-i43]

Scheme 43: Trifluoromethylation of 2-mercapto-4-hydroxy-6-trifluoromethylyrimidine [145].

Apparently, the reaction of these hydroxymercapto heterocyclic derivatives is complicated by stabilization of sulfur centred radicals as illustrated in Scheme 44.

[1860-5397-6-88-i44]

Scheme 44: Deactivation of 2-mercapto-4-hydroxypyrimidines S-centered radicals.

In the case of 2-mercapto-5-hydroxypyrimidines, no tautomeric keto form such as that shown in Scheme 44 is possible and consequently, are perfluoroalkylated without any problems, e.g., 2-mercapto-5-hydroxy-4,6-dimethyl pyrimidine [145].

In summary, heterocyclic thiols react with perfluoroalkyl iodides with considerably more difficultly than aromatic thiols.

4.1.3. Photochemical perfluoroalkylation in organic solvents under phase transfer conditions

Liquid NH3 is a key reaction medium for the reaction of organic thiols with perfluoroalkyl iodides under UV irradiation. However, other solvents have been investigated including alcohols, acetone, acetonitrile, dioxane, THF, DMF, DMSO, HMPA and so on. Polar aprotic solvents emerge as the best. Biphasic reactions with water work well, particularly with diethyl ether and benzene (Table 4).

Table 4: Reaction of thiophenols RC6H4SH and mercapto heterocycles with RFI under UV irradiation in organic solvents and biphasic conditions.

R RF Base Solvent Conditions Yields of ArSRF, % Ref.
Thiophenols
H CF3 PhSNa CH3OH or acetone 0–5 °C, 30 min 57.5 or 79 [143]
      CH3CN   89 [143]
    NaOH CH3OH or acetone 0–5 °C, 30 min 43 or 49 [143]
      CH3CN   72 [143]
  CF(CF3)2 Et3N CH3CN 0 °C, 30 min 88 [104]
  CF3 NaOH Et2O/H2O (Et)3BzN+Cl, 20–25 °C, 30 min 54 [167]
  C3F7       78 [167]
4-Cl C3F7 ArSNaa CH3OH or CH3CN 20 °C, 30 min 61 or 81 [144]
  CF3 NaOH Et2O/H2O (Et)3BzN+Cl, 20–25 °C, 30 min 61 [167]
  C3F7       85  
  i-C3F7       60  
  C6F13       71  
  C3F7   C6H6/H2O   68 [167]
4-CH3 CF3, C3F7 NaOH Et2O/H2O (Et)3BzN+Cl, 20–25 °C, 30 min 58, 83 [167]
  C3F7   C6H6/H2Ob   67 [167]
4-OCH3 CF3 NaOH Et2O/H2O   52 [167]
4-CO2CH3 C3F7 NaOH Et2O/H2O   71 [167]
4-NH2 CF3 NH4OH NH4OH −60 to 25 °C 95 [168]
2-Mercapto heterocyclesc
Heterocycle RF Base Solvent Conditions Yield Ref.
Benzothiazole Cl(CF2)4 NaH DMF 70 °C, 10 h 41.2 [169]
  Cl(CF2)6 NaH DMF 70 °C, 10 h 61.6d [169]
  C6F13 NaH DMF 70 °C, 10 h 53.6 [169]
  C8F17       71.6  
Benzimidazole Cl(CF2)4 NaH DMF 70 °C, 10 h 40.6e [169]
  Cl(CF2)6 NaH DMF 70 °C, 10 h 38.2 [169]
  C6F13, C8F17 NaH DMF 70 °C, 10 h 77.6, 78.2 [169]
Benzoxazole Cl(CF2)6 NaH DMF 70 °C, 10 h 15.0 [169]

aAt ArSH + Et2NH or Et3N for 3 h, the yields are 37% and 28%, respectively.
bIn CH2Cl2/H2O or CHCl3/H2O the yields are 50% and 55%, respectively.
cYields of products are resulted taking into account a conversion of RFI.
dIn presence of (t-Bu)2N-O the yield is 18.6%.
eIn presence of (t-Bu)2N-O the yield is 8.6%.

Heterocyclic thiolates react more slowly with perfluoroalkyl iodides than thiophenoxides both in liquid ammonia and in organic solvents. Besides, in reactions with heterocyclic thiolates, as well as with thiophenoxides, CF3I is a poorer electrophile than C3F7I - even under biphasic conditions.

4.1.4. Interaction of thiols with perfluoroalkyl bromides

Although brominated perfluoroalkanes are cheaper and more readily available than the corresponding iodides, they react more slowly in thioether forming reactions. In general, monobrominated perfluoroalkanes do not react. However, dibromodifluoromethane, bromochlorodifluoromethane as well as 1,2-dibromotetrafluoroethane [170,171] do react with metal phenoxides and thiophenoxides via halophilic mechanisms [64], and almost always lead to mixtures of bromo and chloro containing products of mono- and di-substitution.

Their lower reactivity [88] is largely due to the greater dissociation energy of the C–Br bond (55 kcal/mol for CF3Br) compared to C–I (28 kcal/mol for CF3I) [172]. In addition, CF3Br has a higher reduction potential than CF3I and prefers to receive two rather than one electron on reduction [173].

Nevertheless, it was found [174] that UV irradiation of thiolates in liquid ammonia or dimethylformamide with perfluoroalkyl bromides does result in the formation of the corresponding perfluoroalkyl sulfides as shown in Scheme 45.

[1860-5397-6-88-i45]

Scheme 45: Perfluoroalkylation of thiolates with CF3Br under UV irradiation.

Thiols with electron-donating substituents give reasonable yields, whilst p-chlorothiophenol produces the corresponding trifluoromethyl sulfide in low yield (~3–5%), although better yields are obtained when iodide salts are used as catalysts [175].

Wakselman et al., have shown [176] that liquid C6F13Br reacts with thiolates without any irradiation, whereas bubbling gaseous CF3Br through a DMF solutions of thiolates at 20 °C or heating such mixtures in an autoclave (80 °C) does not produce trifluoromethyl sulfides. Reactions between thiophenoxides and CF3Br are successful if carried out under pressure (CF3Br 2–3 atm) in DMF at 20 °C [176-178]. However, even under these conditions only thiols containing electron-donating groups in the para-position give high yields. All ethers (Table 5), even those with electron-donating groups in the ortho- and meta-positions show very poor reactivity.

Table 5: Yields of CF3Br reaction with thiophenoxides in DMF at 20 °C under pressure (2–3 atm) [178].

Substituents in thiophenols H 4-CH3 4-OCH3 3-OCH3 2-OCH3 3-NH2 4-Cl 3-CF3 4-NHAc
Yields of ArSCF3, % 62 75 83 40 7 23 34 13 9

The best results arise from a combination of two factors – a pressure of CF3Br and UV irradiation [158,179]. Results are given in Tables 6–8. In these cases the influence of the solvent is obvious. For example, p-chlorothiophenol reacts poorly with CF3Br and 4-chloro-4′-trifluoromethylsulfanyldiphenyl sulfide is obtained as a byproduct presumably as the result of photo-substitution of chlorine in 4-trifluoromethylsulfanylchorobenzene by an SRN1 mechanism. HMPA suppressed this side-reaction (similar to iodobenzene with potassium diethyl phosphite [180]) and promoted trifluoromethylation (Table 6).

Table 6: Reactions of thiophenoxides with CF3Br under UV irradiation and pressure of reaction gas [179].

[Graphic 4]
R Solvent Base p (atm) T (°C) Irradiation time, (h) Conversion of ArSH, (%) Isolated yields of ArSCF3 (%)
4-CH3 DMF Et3N 4–5 10–13 1.5   82
4-NH2 DMF Et3N 4.5–6 10–20 2   76.4
3-NH2 HMPA morpholine 3–4 17–19 3.25   63.5a
4-NHCOMe DMF Et3N 3.5 19 2.7   69
4-NHCO2Me DMF Et3N 4.5–5 15–25 1.2 63 55.5
  HMPA morpholine 2–5 8–10 2.5 73 83.6
4-Cl CH3CN Et3N 3–3.5 15–18 2.8 53 43a
  DMF Et3N 3–3.5 14 1.2 100 48a
  HMPA Et3N 4 8–10 1 100 69
  HMPA morpholine 3–4 14–16 3.5 97 62.5
  HMPA morpholine 3–4.5 29–30 3 36 46
  Sulfolane morpholine 3.5 23 2 19.5 5.4
  N-Methyl pyrrolidone morpholine 3.5 17 2.2 35.5 14.3

aDetermined by GLC.

The reaction solvent is important and the yield of the trifluoromethylated product decreases in the following sequence: HMPA > DMF > CH3CN > N-methyl pyrrolidone > sulfolane [179] (Table 6). The efficiency of the combined influence of irradiation and pressure of CF3Br is presented in Table 7.

Table 7: Comparison of RC6H4SCF3 yields, obtained under a pressure of CF3Br with and without UV irradiation (DMF, p = 3–5 atm, T = 10–20 °C).

R Irradiation time, h Yields of RC6H4SCF3, %
  Irradiation Without irradiationa
4-CH3 1.5 82 75
3-NH2 2.2 56 23
  4 72.5  
4-NHCOCH3 2.7 69 9
4-Cl 1.2 48 34

aAccording to [178] (DMF, p = 2–3 atm, 3 h, 20 °C)

As can be seen from the data in (Table 6 and Table 7), in spite of increased product yields in general, the selectivity remains about the same. The best results are found with thiophenols, containing electron-donating substituents in the para-position. It is possible to increase the effectiveness of the p-chlorothiophenol reaction to ~70% by suppression of by-product formation (4-Cl-C6H4SC6H4SCF3-4) and by using HMPA as solvent.

Trifluoromethylation of easily oxidizable aminothiophenols can be conducted by a modified procedure. The required thiophenoxides are prepared directly prior to irradiation by reduction of the corresponding dinitrophenyl disulfides with Li/liquid NH3 (Table 8), in much the same way as the described above for RFI [158,159].

Table 8: Preparation of aminophenyl trifluoromethyl sulfides with CF3Br (3–7 atm) and UV irradiation with preliminary reduction of dinitrodiphenyl disulfides [179].

[Graphic 5]
Location of NO2 (NH2) Solvents p (atm) T (°C) Irradiation time, h Yields of products, %
o- DMF 4.6–6 10–13 7.75 40.9
m- DMF 3–3.5 8–10 2.2 56a
  DMF 3–6 10–14 4 72.5a
  DMF 4–6 12–19 6.8 80.8
  HMPA 3–5 8–10 3 71.8a
p- DMF 5–6 15–20 5 80.3

aIsolated as the acetyl derivative.
Due to greater UV stability of CF3Br compared to CF3I, it is possible to increase the irradiation time, with a beneficial effect on the product yield.

4.1.5. Other methods of initiating

From the knowledge that the reaction mechanism is a single-electron transfer process involving RF radicals, alternative methods to photochemical initiation have been developed (see sections 4.1.1.–4.1.4.), e.g., the electrochemical reduction of perfluoroalkyl halogenides [173,181]. In the presence of thiolate anions the resulting electrophilic radicals react [182,183] to give aryl perfluoroalkyl sulfides (Table 9).

Table 9: Formation of aryl perfluoroalkyl sulfides by electrochemical initiated reactions of ArS with RFHlg.

[Graphic 6]
Reagents Yield of ArSRF, % Ref.
ArS RFHlg On substrate On current  
p-CH3C6H4S CF3I 55 300 [182]
p-CH3C6H4S C3F7I 77 270 [182]
p-CH3C6H4S CF3Br 40a 200 [182]
p-CH3C6H4S C8F17Br 63 360 [182]
p-ClC6H4S CF3I 75 250 [182]
p-ClC6H4S CF3Br 61b 98 [182]
p-ClC6H4S C3F7I 82 450 [182]
p-ClC6H4S CF3I 60 300 [181]
p-CH3OCONHC6H4S CF3I 33 160 [181]
Thiazole-2-S C6F13I 64c   [184]

aWith a carbon-glass electrode a yield is 77%.
bWith a carbon-glass electrode.
cIn the presence of p-O2NC6H4CN.

The good yields for electrochemical perfluoroalkylation (especially > 100% electrochemical yield) are consistent with a radical-chain process.

Perfluoroalkyl iodides are better substrates than the bromides which give lower yields in these electrochemical reactions (Table 9). Such electrochemically initiated reactions are described in detail in a review [35].

Another method of catalytic generation of RF radicals involves electron-transfer from a nucleophile to a perfluoroalkyl halide, in this case using the dimethyl dipyridinium salt (methylviologen, MV2+) as a catalyst. This dication is initially reduced to a radical cation, which then transfers an electron to a perfluoroalkyl iodide [185] to generate RF (Scheme 46). A small amount of MV2+ (7% relative to ArSH) is sufficient for quantitative transformation of thiols into aryl perfluoroalkyl sulfides (Table 10).

[1860-5397-6-88-i46]

Scheme 46: Catalytic effect of methylviologen for RF generation.

Table 10: Catalysis of trifluoromethylation by methylviologen [186].

[Graphic 7]
R MV2+, % Yields of ArSCF3,%
  With MV2+ Without MV2+
H 6.5 91.2 3
Cl 7.0 100.0 5
NO2 7.9 9.2
NHCOOMe 6.9 88.5 11

It should be noted that over-reduction of such halides will generate RF anions rather than the desired RF radicals. For example, tetrakis(dimethylamino)ethylene reacts with RFI to form the perfluoroalkyl anion which acts as a nucleophilic RF-alkylation agent for organic and inorganic substrates [187].

The use of any catalyst in the case of perfluoroalkyl iodides is of more theoretical interest, although the method can be applied in the case of poorly reactive thiophenols. In general these reactions work well (see section 4.1.6.) in common organic solvents or under biphasic conditions [188,189]. Reactions with perfluoroalkyl bromides are more sluggish. Only compounds with long perfluoroalkyl chains such as C6F13Br [178] react readily with thiolates. In the reaction of gaseous CF3Br with thiophenols special procedures are required (see section 4.1.4.): UV irradiation [174], pressure [178] and electrochemical stimulation [182]. Moreover, thiophenols with electron-donating substituents in the para-position give the best results. Combined pressure and irradiation [158,179] improved yields only slightly and requires special equipment. A detailed study of catalytic stimulation in reactions of bromo- and chloro-containing freons RFX with thiols is necessary.

The decreased reactivity of CF3Br as compared to CF3I can be explained, first of all, by the higher reduction potential (−2.07 V against −1.52 V for CF3I on a glass-carbon cathode), and secondly, by the fact that the CF3 radical has a reduction potential (−1.80 V) close to that of CF3Br [173]. Thus trifluoromethyl bromide in reactions with nucleophiles or on a cathode surface accepts two electrons and is transformed to CF3 and therefore does not react with thiolates. The SO2−• radical anion can act as an electron mediator in such reactions. This radical anion, generated by chemical [190-193] or electrochemical [194,195] methods, causes a single-electron reduction of CF3Br with the formation of the necessary trifluoromethyl radical. Thus, the influence of SO2−• sources (Na2S2O4, HOCH2SO2Na or SO2 in presence Zn and Na2HPO4 or HCOONa) on trifluoromethyl bromide in DMF in the presence of diaryl disulfides [193,196] leads to the formation of the corresponding trifluoromethyl sulfides, often in high yields (Scheme 47).

[1860-5397-6-88-i47]

Scheme 47: SO2−• catalyzed trifluoromethylation.

Related transformations with various SO2−• sources involving RFI and CF2ClBr, CFCl2-CF2Cl in the reactions with diaryl disulfides [197] and diselenides have been reported [198]. Electrochemical studies involving the SO2−• radical anion prove that the electron transfer to CF3Br takes place at a reduction potential of the mediator between −0.9 and −1.0 V which prevents the transfer of a second electron to CF3 and the generation of CF3 [199]. Therefore electrochemical reduction in the presence of sulfur dioxide allows the trifluoromethylation of thiophenols with the less reactive, but more readily available trifluoromethyl bromide (Scheme 48).

[1860-5397-6-88-i48]

Scheme 48: Electrochemical reduction of CF3Br in the presence of SO2 [199,200].

Although 4-nitrothiophenol is a very poor substrate (see section 4.1.1. and Table 11), it reacts with perfluoroalkyl iodides to afford 4-perfluoroalkylsulfanylnitrobenzenes in presence of NaH in DMF in almost quantitative yields [201], presumably via “hydride” catalysis.

The catalytic influence of SO2 on the reaction of ArS with CF3Br is not limited to the activation of the initial bromide. Sulfur dioxide can oxidize the radical anion ArSCF3−•, i.e., it can affect the rate determining step of the process [189] (Scheme 49).

[1860-5397-6-88-i49]

Scheme 49: Participation of SO2 in the oxidation of ArSCF3−•.

This dual influence of sulfur dioxide contributes to the overall efficiency of these reactions.

By comparing the possibility of two mediators (SO2 and MV), Koshechko et al., [202] have shown that the radical cation MV+• (Ep = −0.4 V) easily reduces SO2 (Ep= −0.9 V) to its radical anion which in turn activates CF3Br. Thus, a combination of both mediators generates an electron transfer cascade (Scheme 50).

[1860-5397-6-88-i50]

Scheme 50: Electron transfer cascade involving SO2 and MV.

Thus, bubbling CF3Br into a solution of thiophenol or thiocresol in DMF containing pyridine, SO2 and a catalytic amount of MV2+ 2 I, results in the formation of the corresponding aryl trifluoromethyl sulfides in moderate to good yields (40–70%) [202].

Similar reactions with SO2, where KI or I2 were used instead of MV2+ have been carried out [202], however, the yields of PhSCF3 were reduced. The catalytic effect of iodide ion was discovered from UV irradiation of a reaction mixture of p-chlorothiophenol with CF3Br in different solvents [175].

The MV2+/SO2 system is effective for reactions with Freons, particularly those with C–Cl bonds such as Freon-113 (CF2Cl-CFCl2) [202].

A good example of the catalytic properties of SO2 has recently been shown in the reaction of 1,2-dibromotetrafluoroethane with thiophenoxides [203]. It is known that these reactions ArSCF2CF2Br and a significant amount of ArSCF2CF2H are produced. The presence of SO2 in the reaction promotes a SRN1 process which results in quantitative yields of ArSCF2CF2Br without the byproduct ArSCF2CF2H.

4.1.6. Spontaneous perfluoroalkylation of thiols without initiators

Since Feiring reported in 1984 that reactions of thiolate anions and perfluoroalkyl iodides can occur spontaneously without any initiator [188], the method has been extensively investigated and the reaction conditions optimized (Table 11 and Table 12). Reactions times, for example, are shortened with heating (60–70 °C) [204].

Table 11: Reactions of thiols RC6H4SH and HetArSH with RFI in organic solvents and in biphasic conditions without initiators.

R SH, (SCat+) RF Base Reaction conditions Yields of ArSRF, % Ref.
Thiophenols
H SNa C8F17 DMF, 25 °C, 17 h 90 [188]
H SNa C8F17 DMF, 25 °C, 17 h + norbornene 77 [188]
H SNa C8F17 DMF, 25 °C, 17 h + styrene 0 [188]
H SNa CF(CF3)2 DMF, 25 °C, 17 h 76 [188]
H SNBu4 C6F13 CH2Cl2/H2O, 40 °C, 4 h 48 [188]
H SNBu4 C6F13 C6H6/H2O, 25 °C, 2.5 h 76a [188]
H   R(CF2)n   DMF, conditions are not presented 56–87 [205]
4-NH2 SH C2F5 K2CO3 DMF, 10 °C 84 [206]
4-F SNa C10F21 DMF, 70 °C, 1 h 97 [204]
4-F SNa CF2)4I DMF, 25 °C,12 h, 60 °C, 1 h 86b  
4-Cl SNa (CF2)8I DMF, 50 °C, 6 h    
H SH C4F9 NaH DMF, 20–25 °C, 17–18 h 66 [201]
4-CH3 SH C4F9 NaH DMF, 20–25 °C, 17–18 h 77 [201]
4-OH SH C4F9 NaH DMF, 20–25 °C, 17–18 h 30 [201]
4-Cl SH C4F9 NaH DMF, 20–25 °C, 17–18 h 83 [201]
4-NO2 SH C4–C8 NaH DMF, 20–25 °C, 17–18 h 93–99 [201]
F5 SCu CF2=CF DMAC, 70 °C, 20 h 65 [207]
F5 SCu C8F17   DMAC, 70 °C, 20 h 0 [207]
H SeNa CF3Br   EtOH, 20 °C, 2 h, olefins 2–60 [160]
H SeNa C4F9I–C8F17I   EtOH, 20 °C, 2 h, olefins   [160]
Heterocyclic thiols
Heterocycle RF Base Reaction conditions Yields Ref.
2-SH-benzothiazole C3F7 NEt3 DMF, 55–60 °C, 3–48 h Traces [189]
    C3F7 NEt3 DMF, 20–22 °C, 120 h 59 [189]
    Cl(CF2)4–6 NaH DMF, 70 °C, 10 h 0–4.5c [169]
2-SH-benzimidazole Cl(CF2)4–6 NaH DMF, 70 °C, 10 h 0–3d [169]
8-SNa-quinoline C3F7 NEt3 DMF, 20–22 °C, 24 h 72 [189]

aIn the presence of norbornene and styrene the yields are 30% and 0%, respectively.
bα, ω-Bis(SAr)perfluoroalkanes.
c8.5% conver. RFI.
d~3% conver. RFI.

Later it was found that these types of reaction can be made to proceed considerably easier and quicker (Table 12). In acetonitrile or DMF the majority of thiophenolates react rapidly with C3F7I at room temperature (from 10–15 min to 2–3 h). However, for spontaneous reaction many factors are involved such as carrying out the reaction in the dark, temperature, solvent etc. This is discussed in more detail in section 4.1.7.

Table 12: Reaction conditions of thiophenoxides RC6H4S Et3NH+ with RFI without irradiation [189].

[Graphic 8]
Entry R RF Solvent T (°C) t (h) Yields (%)
  ArSRF ArS-SAr ArSH
1 H C3F7 DMF 19–20 2 83 3
2 4-NHCO2CH3 C3F7 DMF 21–22 20 min 89 3
3a 4-NHCO2CH3 C3F7 DMF 21–22 1 60 4 12
4 4-NHCO2CH3 CF3 DMF 21–22 1 70 9
5 4-NHCO2CH3 C3F7 DMF 0–5 3 17 12 30
6 4-NHCO2CH3 CF3 DMF 0–22 5 30 7 54
7 4-NHCO2CH3 C3F7 HMPA 0–5 3 0 12 50
8 4-NHCO2CH3 C3F7 HMPA 21–22 2 75 3
9 4-NHCO2CH3 C3F7 CH3CN 21–22 0.5 98 Traces
10 4-NHCO2CH3 C3F7 dioxane 21–22 2 82 2
11 4-NHCO2CH3 C3F7 THF 21–22 1.5 64 10
12 2-NH2 C3F7 CH3CN 21–30b 10 min 84 -
13 2-NH2 CF3 DMF 23–24 1 66 7
14 4-OCH3 C3F7 CH3CN 22–40b 10 min 88 6
15 4-Cl C3F7 DMF 22 2 72 3
16 4-Cl C3F7 CH3CN 21–22 3 40 12 9
17 4-COOH C3F7 DMF 22–30b 10 min 72 Traces Traces
18 4-COOCH3 C3F7 DMF 20 3 39 13 Traces
19 4-NO2c C3F7 DMF 50–55 5 Traces 6 80

aIn the dark.
bSpontaneous warming.
cSodium thiophenoxide.

4.1.7. Reaction mechanism

The stages of S-perfluoroakylation [22,35,143,188,208] can be represented as follows (Scheme 51):

[1860-5397-6-88-i51]

Scheme 51: Four stages of the SRN1 mechanism for thiol perfluoroalkylation.

The peculiar behavior of 4-nitrothiophenol [143,146] and 4-hydroxypyrimidine-2-thiol [145] unlike the more electronegative p-SO2CF3- and o-SO2CHF2-thiophenols [143] is presumably related to the ability of the nitro- and carbonyl groups to stabilize the mercapto-radicals in the radical ion pairs [O2NArS + RF] and [O=CArS + RF]. As a result, these radicals are less reactive, although at higher temperatures an increase in their activity is observed.

The participation of radicals is supported by the fact that the addition of nitrobenzene [178] or di-tert-butylnitroxide [169] inhibits the reaction. The addition of olefins such as norbornene or styrene [188] has a similar effect and perfluoroalkyl derivatives of these olefins have been identified in the reaction products. The formation of radicals in the reaction of PhSeNa with perfluoroalkyl halides (PhSe and RF) has been firmly established from their interception by unsaturated compounds [160].

Further confirmation of a radical mechanism was obtained by studying the reaction without an initiator (Table 12 and Table 13). The decrease of reaction temperature, carrying out the reaction in the absence of light, the presence of electron-withdrawing substituents in the thiol ring and use of low-polar solvents all led to lower ArSRF yields. Also replacement of C3F7I for CF3I leads to a slower reaction and reduced yields of aryl perfluoroalkyl sulfides. In spite of heptafluoropropyl iodide being a stronger oxidant than CF3I [182,209], greater amounts of diaryl disulfides are obtained only with CF3I. The factors listed above influence the yields of diaryl disulfides in a different way. They either do not change (in darkness), or they even slightly increase (from 3–4 to 12–13%).

These observations point towards the rate determining step of the reaction [189]. Two steps (Scheme 51), i.e., the rapid fragmentation of the radical anion RFX−• (Equation 2) [173] and recombination of the electrophilic radical RF with the ArS anion (Equation 3) are fast and cannot therefore be rate limiting.

Since all experimental factors (light, temperature, solvent etc.) have an inverted influence on the yields of disulfides, it can be assumed that Equation 1, the generation of ArS is also not limiting. Therefore electron transfer from the radical anion [ArSRF]−•, Equation 4, seems to be the most likely.

Homogeneous catalysis by the methyl viologen (MV) [186] supports this. This catalyst can oxidize the radical anion [ArSRF]−• via its dication (MV2+) [200,202], accelerating the last step (Scheme 52).

[1860-5397-6-88-i52]

Scheme 52: A double role of MV in the catalysis of RFI reactions with aryl thiols.

4.2. Radical perfluoroalkylation

Synthetic methods for aryl perfluoroalkyl sulfides via RF radicals are now described. Prolonged UV irradiation of CF3I solutions with diaryl disulfides in liquid ammonia results in the formation of the corresponding aryl trifluoromethyl sulfides (Table 13).

Table 13: UV irradiation of CF3I with diaryl disulfides in a sealed quartz tube [157].

[Graphic 9]
R t (h) Yield of ArSCF3 (%)
H   12a
4-Cl 5 36.5a
4-NO2 25 58
2-NO2 12 72

aExtracted from mixtures.

For diaryl disulfides the CF3 radical can attack either the sulfur atom or the aromatic ring, [132,210] and thus give rise to undesired side products. Arylperfluoroalkyl sulfides are formed also in a reverse strategy from aliphatic disulfides and aryl radicals. For example, during irradiation of bis(trifluoromethyl) disulfide and pentafluoroiodobenzene [211] the product mixture contains C6F5SCF3, C6F5SSCF3, CF3I as well as (CF3S)2 with (CF3)2S suggesting the following reaction mechanism (Scheme 53).

[1860-5397-6-88-i53]

Scheme 53: Photochemical reaction of pentafluoroiodobenzene with trifluoromethyl disulfide.

N-Trifluoromethyl-N-nitrosobenzene sulfonamide has been used as a source of CF3 radicals. This reagent (obtained by reaction of CF3NO, NH2OH and benzenesulfonic acid chloride) reacts with organic disulfides under irradiation or on mild heating to give the corresponding trifluoromethyl sulfides (Scheme 54).

[1860-5397-6-88-i54]

Scheme 54: N- Trifluoromethyl-N-nitrosobenzene sulfonamide – a source of CF3 radicals [212,213].

The N- trifluoromethylnitrososulfonamide of trifluoromethane sulfonic acid reacts similarly with aliphatic disulfides [214]. Interaction of CF3NO with aryl sulfonamides generates relatively stable trifluoromethyl azosulfonyl arenes ArSO2N=NCF3, which decomposed on heating to CF3 radicals which react with organic disulfides to form trifluoromethyl sulfides [215] (Scheme 55).

[1860-5397-6-88-i55]

Scheme 55: Radical trifluoromethylation of organic disulfides with ArSO2N=NCF3.

Barton has shown [216] that the irradiation of thiohydroxamic esters of perfluorocarboxylic acids generates RF radicals which in the presence of olefins give addition products. However, in the absence of radical traps they attack the sulfur to yield, for example, S-perfluoroalkyl derivatives of pyridine (Scheme 56).

[1860-5397-6-88-i56]

Scheme 56: Barton’s S-perfluoroalkylation reactions [216].

Decarboxylation of non-fluorinated carboxylic acid esters proceeds in a similar manner to afford 2-pyridyl sulfides. However, in the presence of C6F13I the reaction follows a different course where the perfluorinated radical attacks sulfur with the formation of the fluorinated sulfide [217] (Scheme 57).

[1860-5397-6-88-i57]

Scheme 57: Decarboxylation of thiohydroxamic esters in the presence of C6F13I.

The irradiation of thioesters of trifluoroacetic and trifluoromethanesulfonic acids in refluxing methylene chloride results in their decarbonylation (or desulfonation in the case of CF3SO2SR) with the production of CF3 radicals, which then react with diaryl- or dialkyl disulfides (Scheme 58).

[1860-5397-6-88-i58]

Scheme 58: Reactions of thioesters of trifluoroacetic and trifluoromethanesulfonic acids in the presence of aromatic disulfides [218].

The formation of aryl trifluoromethyl sulfides from thioesters of trifluoroacetic acid occurs in rather better yields (30–40%) than from the corresponding esters of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (20–30%). Alkyl thioesters of trifluoroacetic and trifluoromethanesulfonic acids form AlkSCF3 in higher yields (up to 80%). As shown in Scheme 58, the CF3 radical can attack at several sites. Phenyl selenide esters of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid react analogously [218].

The photochemical decomposition of trifluoromethanesulfonic and carboxylic thioesters affords CF3 radicals which can be used to prepare trifluoromethyl sulfides [219].

Xenon difluoride has been used to initiate oxidative decarboxylation of perfluorocarboxylic acids for RF generation and with aromatic and heterocyclic compounds the perfluoroalkyl groups can also become incorporated into the aromatic ring [220]. Nevertheless, Sipyagin et al., have employed this method for the perfluoroalkylation of thiols such as polychloropyridine thiols [221]. Two different methods were used: the action of preformed xenon carboxylates (method A) or treatment of a pyridinethiol solution in RFCOOH directly with xenon difluoride (method B). A range of isomeric perfluoroalkyl sulfides was obtained (Scheme 59).

[1860-5397-6-88-i59]

Scheme 59: Perfluoroalkylation of polychloropyridine thiols with xenon perfluorocarboxylates or XeF2 [222,223].

Similar reactions have been carried out with tetrafluoropyridine 4-thiol [224] and its corresponding disulfide [225,226] (40–50% yield). The formation of S-perfluoroalkyl derivatives with performed xenon carboxylates from nitro aromatic disulfides was also successful (Scheme 60).

[1860-5397-6-88-i60]

Scheme 60: Interaction of Xe(OCORF)2 with nitroaryl disulfide [227].

Perfluoroalkylsulfinic acids can also be used for oxidative decomposition. For example, careful treatment of sodium trifluoromethylsulfinate with tert-butyl hydroperoxide in the presence of an organic disulfide gives the corresponding trifluoromethyl sulfide [228,229]. Aliphatic disulfides react well to give AlkSCF3 but problems arise with aromatic disulfides due to attack of the CF3 radical on the aromatic rings. For example, diphenyl disulfide is converted only in 13% yield. The S/C ratio reflecting the amount of trifluoromethylation on sulfur and on the aryl ring depends on the solvent. In CH3CN it is 36:64, while in aqueous CH3CN it is 60:40. Dichlorodiphenyl disulfide gives the best ratio in favor of the sulfide in aqueous acetonitrile [228].

One final method of CF3 radical generation involves the interaction of Bi(CF3)3/Cu(OCOCH3)2 with thiophenolate (Scheme 61).

[1860-5397-6-88-i61]

Scheme 61: Bi(CF3)3/Cu(OCOCH3)2 trifluoromethylation of thiophenolate [230].

The above methods for the synthesis of aryl perfluoroalkyl sulfides all generate electrophilic RF radicals which prefers to react at nucleophilic reaction centers such as S, C=S or S. In the case of diaryl disulfides [228] the regioselectivity of attack is less controlled due to ring delocalization.

4.3. Anionic perfluoroalkylation

This method of perfluoroalkylation involves the reaction of aromatic or heterocyclic sulfur compounds with perfluoroalkyl anions, stabilized by suitable ligands, or with a reagent that generates such an anion.

Perfluoroalkyl anions are extremely unstable. For example, the CF3 anion decomposes at −100 °C with the elimination of F and formation of difluorocarbene, which reacts further or dimerizes [123]. Nevertheless, in the last two decades nucleophilic perfluoroalkylation of organic compounds has expanded. The problem of RF-lithium anion stability in synthesis has been reviewed [24]. Trifluoromethylated reagents of heavy metals and their application in organic synthesis were considered by Barton [25], whilst perfluoroalkylated [31,32] and trifluoromethylated [27,28,30] organosilicon compounds have attracted considerable interest. However, despite the large body of literature involving the use of such reagents, the synthesis of aryl perfluoroalkyl sulfides is restricted to anionic attack on sulfenyl chlorides and thiocyanates.

Various methods for the synthesis of aryl perfluoroalkyl sulfides, depending on the mode of generation of the perfluoroalkyl anion, are described below.

4.3.1. “RF” from a perfluorinated olefins

Relatively stable tertiary perfluoroalkyl carbanions can be prepared by addition of fluoride ion to fluoroolefins [151,231-234] or by the deprotonation of monohydroperfluoroalkanes or their derivatives [235,236] as shown in Scheme 62. Most processes involve generating the hexafluoroisopropyl carbanions with a third stabilizing group such as CF3 [151,231,232,236], C3F7 [233,234], as well as CN, COC2F5, COOMe [232,236]. Reactions of the resulting salts with aryl sulfenyl (or aryl selenyl) chlorides yield perfluoro- or polyfluoroalkyl sulfides (selenides).

[1860-5397-6-88-i62]

Scheme 62: Reaction of fluorinated carbanions with aryl sulfenyl chlorides.

The [C3F7(CF3)2C] anion, obtained from isomeric dimers of perfluoropropylene in the presence of KF or CsF, reacts with sulfenyl chlorides and selenyl chlorides to afford the corresponding sulfides and selenides bearing a tertiary perfluorohexyl group [233].

In the reaction of RF carbanions with sulfenyl chlorides high yields of sulfides are obtained when either electron-withdrawing or electron-donating substituents are present on the aryl ring. The yields of isomeric nitrophenyl perfluoro-tert-butyl sulfides decrease, the closer the nitro group is to the sulfur atom: p-NO2 – 86%, m-NO2 – 78% [231] and o-NO2 – 68% [232]. Both secondary and tertiary anions react [236] but nature of the counter ion is important. Thus, cesium or potassium perfluoro tert-butyl alkyls obtained by the addition of CsF or KF to perfluoroisobutene, give high yields of ArSC(CF3)3 [151,231,232], while the same anion, generated by deprotonation of nonafluoroisobutane (CF3)3CH with NEt3 gives PhSC(CF3)3 in low yield ~20% [236].

In the reaction of methyl perfluoromethacrylate with PhSCl in the presence of fluoride ion, prolonged stirring gave two sulfides as shown in Scheme 63, illustrating the competition between halides (F and Cl) for fluoroolefin addition [232].

[1860-5397-6-88-i63]

Scheme 63: Reaction of methyl perfluoromethacrylate with PhSCl in the presence of fluoride.

4.3.2. “RF” from perfluoroalkyl halogenides

In a similar manner to alkylhalides, perfluorinated alkylhalides also form organometallic derivatives which can be used for the synthesis of perfluoroalkyl sulfides. The effectiveness of such reagents depends largely on the counterion which is illustrated below for reactions with organic thiocyanates (Scheme 64). Potassium perfluoroisopropyl (generated from CF2=CFCF3 and KF) reacts with phenyl- and p-nitrophenyl thiocyanates in sulfolane at 100 °C, whilst the Grignard reagent (n-C4F9MgI) reacts at subzero temperatures.

[1860-5397-6-88-i64]

Scheme 64: Reactions of ArSCN with potassium and magnesium perfluorocarbanions [237].

Cuprates react with benzyl thiocyanate but require more forcing conditions, i.e., 100 °C [237], whereas in situ generated zinc reagents RFZnX react with thiocyanates at 20 °C in pyridine [238].

Recently, it has been shown that tetrakis(dimethylamino)ethylene (TDAE) can undergo a two-electron transfer to perfluoroalkyliodides to generate RF anions [187] which react with organic disulfides to afford perfluoroalkyl sulfides in high yields [239,240]. The economy of this method, as distinct from previous methods [196,241-248], lies in the fact that the thiolate released by the first nucleophilic attack on the disulfide reacts directly with a second equivalent of perfluoroalkyliodide, to form a second equivalent of the desired perfluoroalkyl sulfide (Scheme 65). This approach thus combines two principles of trifluoromethylation, i.e., nucleophilic attack of the RF-anion on the disulfide and reaction of a radical anion with a thiol as noted in section 4.1.

[1860-5397-6-88-i65]

Scheme 65: Reactions of RFI with TDAE and organic disulfides [239,240].

4.3.3. “RF” from perfluorocarboxylic acids

A simple method for the generation of metal derivatives of perfluoroalkyl carbanions by the decarboxylation of alkali salts of perfluorocarboxylic acids, has also been used. For example, heating potassium perfluoroalkyl carboxylates in the presence of diaryl disulfides in DMF or sulfolane leads to the formation of the corresponding aryl perfluoroalkyl sulfides as summarized in Table 14.

Table 14: Perfluoroalkylation of aryl disulfides by decarboxylation of perfluorocarboxylates.

[Graphic 10]
R RF Solvent T (°C) Yield of ArSRF % Ref.
H CF3 DMF 140 84 [245]
H CF3 sulfolane 180–230 56 [242]
4-Me CF3 sulfolane 180–230 51 [242]
4-Cl CF3 sulfolane 180–230 56 [242]
4-F CF3 sulfolane 180–230 82 [242]
2-Br CF3 sulfolane 180–230 48 [242]
4-OMe CF3 sulfolane 180–230 50 [242]
H C2F5 DMF 145 70 [245]
4-Me C2F5 DMF 145 50 [245]
4-NO2 C2F5 DMF 145 42 [245]

Disulfides of pyridine [242], pyrimidine and naphthalene [249] have also been used in such reactions. The use of this method for longer perfluorocarboxylic acids leads to product mixtures that result from chain isomerism and cyclisation [250,251] (Scheme 66).

[1860-5397-6-88-i66]

Scheme 66: Decarboxylation of perfluorocarboxylates in the presence of disulfides [245].

Polyhalogenated carboxylic acids containing fluorine together with other halogens can also alkylate disulfides. However, the results strongly depend on the structure of halogenated alkyl group. The method is successful for potassium trichloroacetate but not for difluorochloroacetate. In the latter case the corresponding sulfide PhSCF2Cl was found but only in trace amounts whilst PhSCCl3 is obtained in 80% yield [245]. The mixed haloalkyl anions appear to be less stable.

The stability and reactivity of perfluoroalkyl anions largely depend on the solvents used. For example, CF3MgI [252-254] and CF3Li [123,255-258] in diethyl ether are unstable even at low temperatures, but in coordinating solvents such as sulfolane, N-methylpyrrolidone, HMPA and especially, in DMF, the CF3 anion does not decompose so readily and can be used as a nucleophilic reagent [259].

4.3.4. “CF3” from trifluoromethane (fluoroform)

Trifluoromethane (fluoroform) has been used as a source of the trifluoromethyl anion. Trifluoromethane is a waste product of Teflon manufacture and it is of interest as a raw material for organofluorine chemistry [260]. However, its application has been restricted by the low stability of the CF3 anion [123,252-255].

The CF3 anion has greater stability when the counter ion is a bulky ammonium ion, and in the presence of pyrrolidone it reacts with aldehydes and ketones [261]. This suggests that an intermediate gem-aminoalcoholate is involved. The method is improved with DMF, which is also thought to form a stable aminoalcoholate intermediate (Scheme 67) [243,262,263].

[1860-5397-6-88-i67]

Scheme 67: Organization of a stable form of “CF3” anion in the DMF.

This mechanism is supported by the observation that equivalent reactions do not occur in THF or DMSO [263]. Furthermore, the intermediate CF3 aminoalcoholate has been trapped in its protonated form and as hydrated trifluoroacetaldehyde by the action of acids, as well as trapped as a silyl ether [243]. The deprotonation of fluoroform has been applied successfully for the synthesis of aromatic trifluoromethyl sulfides and selenides, as summarized in Table 15.

Table 15: Reaction of the CF3 anion derived from fluoroform with S-derivatives of thiophenols.

[Graphic 11]
B R X Yield, % Ref.
t-BuOK H SPh 80 [243]
t-BuOK H SO2Ph 90 [243]
t-BuOK 4-NO2 Cl 60 [243]
LiN(TMS)2/NH(TMS)2 H SPh 4 [244]
N(TMS)3/Me4NF H SPh 6 [244]
t-BuOK H SPh 82 [244]
N(TMS)3/Me4NF H SePh 61a [244]
t-BuOK H SePh 77a [244]

aPhSeCF3.

Langlois et al. have used silylated amines in the presence of fluoride ion to promote fluoroform deprotonation [244]. For example, with (Me3Si)3N such reactions were possible in both DMF and THF. In the latter case stabilization of the CF3 anion and its reaction with disulfide probably involves a transition state complex such as that depicted in Scheme 68.

[1860-5397-6-88-i68]

Scheme 68: Silylated amines in the presence of fluoride can deprotonate fluoroform for reaction with disulfides [244].

In the case of trifluoromethylation of aliphatic disulfides, silazanes are the preferred reagents. However, in the case of diaryl disulfides, e.g., diphenyl disulfide, the significant formation of byproducts occurs and, PhSN(TMS)2 (46%) and PhSCHF2 (23%) are main reaction products. Other CF3 aminomethanols have been synthesized by Langlois et al. [264] (Figure 7).

[1860-5397-6-88-7]

Figure 7: Other examples of aminomethanols [264].

Trifluoromethylation of disulfides by the first of them was efficient, for example, 87% in the case of PhSCF3 but less efficient for diselenides (PhSeCF3 45%) [246]. The reaction failed with bis(4-chlorophenyl) disulfide and dioctyl disulfide where only by-products were generated.

Silylated hemiaminals are more suitable for CF3 transfer (Table 16), although high reaction temperatures (60–80 °C) are required.

Table 16: Reactions of silylated hemiaminals with disulfides [246].

[Graphic 12]
R S (Se) Z “F T, °C Yield, %
H S O CsF 80 50
H S O TBATa 80 90
H S NCH2Ph TBAT 60 78
H S NCH2Ph TBAT 80 95
4-Cl S NCH2Ph TBAT 80 95
H Se NCH2Ph TBAT 80 92
4-Cl Se NCH2Ph TBAT 80 75

aTBAT: Bu4N+ Ph3SiF2.

The use of F anion as an alkaline agent (De-Shopge reagent, Bu4N+ Ph3SiF2) in place of a strong base (t-BuOK) allows trifluoromethylation of aliphatic disulfides.

4.3.5. “CF3” anion from trifluoromethyl silanes

Perfluoroalkyltrialkyl silanes in the presence of fluoride ion generate reactive RF carbanions which have been used widely in synthesis [27,28,30-32,265]. For example, Ruppert’s reagent, CF3SiMe3 [266] and its tin analogue (CF3SnMe3) have been used for the nucleophilic introduction of a CF3 group to electrophilic sulfur for the preparation of trifluoromethyl sulfoxides and sulfones [267-269]. Trifluoromethyl trimethylsilane has also been used for the synthesis of aromatic trifluoromethyl sulfides and selenides (Table 17).

Table 17: Trifluoromethylation of sulfur and selenium compounds with Ruppert’s reagent.

[Graphic 13]
X F R Yield, % Ref.
Cl TASFa H 59 [270]
Cl TASF 4-Cl 72 [270]
Cl TASF 4-NO2 69 [270]
Cl Bu4NF 4-NO2 14 [241]
SPh Bu4NF H 32 (43b) [241]
CN Bu4NF H 70 (58b) [271]
CN Bu4NF 4-NO2 58 [271]
CN Bu4NF 2,4-(OMe)2 30 [271]

aTASF = (Me2N)3S+ Me3SiF2.
bArSeCF3.

Reactions proceed easily in THF or light hydrocarbon solvents and the reaction can also be extended to aliphatic and heterocyclic [271] sulfur-trifluoromethylations. The data (Table 17) indicate that the source of the F anion exerts an important influence on the reaction of sulfenyl chlorides with CF3SiMe3 [267]. For example, in the presence of TASF p-nitrophenyl trifluoromethyl sulfide is formed in almost 70% yield, while the use of Bu4N+ F (even 2 equiv) under identical conditions gives only a 14% yield. In addition, in the reaction of diaryl disulfides with CF3SiMe3 it has been shown [241] that the best results are obtained when the Bu4NF is added with a syringe-pump rather than by ordinary dropwise addition.

Such trifluoromethylation reactions with CF3SiMe3 can also be catalysed with cyanide ion. However, this also results in competing side reactions where the cyanide attacks the disulfide directly and is especially problematic in the case of aliphatic disulfides [271].

4.3.6. “CF3-anion” from ArSOCF3 and ArSO2CF3

Aryl trifluoromethyl sulfones react with CH3ONa to generate sodium arylsulfonates and fluoroform [272], and with Grignard reagents to generate aryl alkyl- or diaryl sulfones [273]. Also nucleophilic substitution of the pentafluoroethyl group can be induced in bis(pentafluoroethyl) sulfone by various nucleophiles [274]. Prakash et al. have adapted this chemistry for nucleophilic trifluoromethylation. Both phenyl trifluoromethyl sulfone or the corresponding sulfoxide on treatment with t-BuOK in DMF generate a CF3-adduct similar to that formed during fluoroform deprotonation [243,263], which is a useful trifluoromethylating agent for aldehydes, ketones and disulfides [248]. An example is shown in Scheme 69.

[1860-5397-6-88-i69]

Scheme 69: Trifluoromethylation of diphenyl disulfide with PhSO2CF3/t-BuOK.

On the other hand, under the same reaction conditions methyl trifluoromethyl sulfone does not function as a trifluoromethylating agent, whilst esters and amides of trifluoromethane sulfinic acid are good trifluoromethyl transfer agents [247] (Scheme 70).

[1860-5397-6-88-i70]

Scheme 70: Amides of trifluoromethane sulfinic acid are sources of CF3 anion.

However, trifluoromethylation strategies with aryl trifluoromethyl -sulfoxides, -sulfones, -sulfinates, and amides have to compete with cheaper reagents such as fluoroform, trifluoroacetic acid derivatives and trifluoromethyl halogenides. For the synthesis of aryl trifluoromethyl sulfides, it should be noted that these are prepared from sulfones, which are in turn synthesized from the same sulfides.

4.4. Cationic perfluoroalkylation

Aryl perfluoroalkyl iodonium reagents as perfluoroalkylating agents were first developed by Yagupolski et al. [275]. Unlike perfluoroalkyl iodides, tolyl perfluoroalkyl iodonium chlorides react easily with sodium thiophenolates and selenophenolates at low temperature to form the corresponding aryl perfluoroalkyl sulfides and selenides as summarized in Table 18.

Table 18: Interaction of tolyl perfluoroalkyl iodonium chlorides with sodium thiophenolates and selenophenolate [275].

[Graphic 14]
R RF Yields, % (GLC) of
  ArSRF ArSeORFa
H C3F7 61 (81) 87
CH3 C3F7 71 (96)
NO2 C3F7 34 (56)
H C6F13 41 45

aAfter chlorination and subsequent hydrolysis of corresponding selenides.

These iodonium salts even react with sodium p-nitrothiophenolate and while C3F7I does not react without some initiation [189] the C3F7 containing salts (Table 18) react readily. The yields of p-O2NC6H4SRF (RF = C3F7 and C6F13) are increased to a quantitative level by the use of iodonium tetrafluoroborate salts [276] instead of chlorides.

Similarly, perfluoroalkyl phenyl iodonium trifluoromethanesulfonates (FITS reagents) react with thiolates [277]: Perfluoroalkylation is selective for sulfur even in the presence of other functional groups (e.g. OH, NHMe, COOH, COOAlk). The preparation and application of RF iodonium salts has been reviewed [33]. However, CF3 iodonium salts were not discussed, presumably due to their low stability.

A “hyper-valent” iodine (III) compound containing a trifluoromethyl group, first synthesized in 2006 [278], appears to be quite stable. This moisture-sensitive reagent reacts with aromatic, heterocyclic and aliphatic thiols at low temperature (−78 °C) with the formation of the corresponding SCF3 derivatives in high yields (Scheme 71).

[1860-5397-6-88-i71]

Scheme 71: Trifluoromethylation of various thiols using “hyper-valent” iodine (III) reagent [279].

However, this attractive methodology has some drawbacks in that its synthesis involves four steps and trifluoromethylation products must be purified by chromatography to remove a side-product – 2-iodophenyl dimethyl carbinol.

Unlike iodonium salts, onium salts of the group VI elements appear to be more stable with CF3 group. Diaryl RF-sulfonium salts, where RF = CF3, are readily synthesized from aryl trifluoromethyl sulfoxides [280]. Reaction of these reagents with sodium p-nitrothiophenolate affords the trifluoromethyl sulfide in good yield (Scheme 72).

[1860-5397-6-88-i72]

Scheme 72: Trifluoromethylation of p-nitrothiophenolate with diaryl CF3 sulfonium salts [280].

It should be noted that for perfluoroalkylation is it necessary to use the diaryl sulfonium salts and not aryl alkyl sulfonium salts, since reaction of PhS+(CH3)CF3 BF4, with p-nitrothiophenolate yields the SCH3 compound not the SCF3 derivative [280]. Subsequently, diaryl thiophenium, -selenophenium and -tellurophenium reagents have been developed with perfluoroalkyl groups attached to S, Se and Te [33,281,282] which can transfer perfluoroalkyl fragments to nucleophilic centers. In particular, the dibenzo (CF3)S-, (CF3)Se- and (CF3)Te-phenium systems have been investigated. For example, S(CF3)dibenzothiophenium triflate (A = S) reacts with sodium thiolate in DMF to give the S-trifluoromethyl derivative in high yield. The related selenophenium salt (A = Se) appears to be more effective in trifluoromethyl transfer (Scheme 73).

[1860-5397-6-88-i73]

Scheme 73: Trifluoromethyl transfer from dibenzo (CF3)S-, (CF3)Se- and (CF3)Te-phenium salts to thiolates [283].

The same general reactivity is also observed in reactions of these reagents with aliphatic thiols. Dibenzoselenophenium triflate (A = Se, R1 and R2 = H) reacts much better with sodium dodecyl thiolate (yield of C12H25SCF3 is 87%) than the sulfur analogue (yield 47%) [283,284].

On the whole RF onium compounds are powerful perfluoroalkylating agents [33,281], however they are rather exotic reagents which require to be synthesized by multi-stage methods as illustrated in Scheme 74.

[1860-5397-6-88-i74]

Scheme 74: Multi-stage paths for synthesis of dibenzo-CF3-thiophenium salts [61].

Conclusion

A summary of the known methods for the synthesis of aromatic and heterocyclic perfluoroalkyl sulfides are presented. These involve perfluoroalkylation of thiols by single electron transfer, nucleophilic and electrophilic methods. The variety of methods reflects the level of interest chemists have given to generating this class of fluorine containing organic compounds. As a class of compounds, perfluoroalkyl sulfides find increasing utility in agrochemical and pharmaceutical applications.

A concise review concerning the preparation of selectively fluorinated ethers, thioethers, amines and phosphines was published [285] during preparation of this manuscript.

References

  1. Hansch, C.; Leo, A. Substituent constants for correlation analysis in chemistry and biology; Wiley: New York, 1979; p 339.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Becker, A. Inventory of industrial fluoro-biochemicals; Eyrolles: Paris, 1996; p 1041.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Leroux, F.; Jeschke, P.; Schlosser, M. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 827–856. doi:10.1021/cr040075b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Langlois, D. R.; Dillard, T.; Large, S.; Roques, N. Fluorinated Bio-Active Compounds in the Agricultural and Medical Fields; Brussels: Belgium, 1999.
    Sept 13–15, 1999; Paper No 24.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Yagupolskii, L. M.; Maletina, I. I.; Petko, K. I.; Fedyuk, D. V. Fluorinated Bio-Active Compounds in the Agricultural and Medical Fields; Brussels: Belgium, 1999.
    September 13–15, 1999; Paper No 17.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Yagupolskii, L. M.; Maletina, I. I.; Petko, K. I.; Fedyuk, D. V.; Handrock, R.; Shavaran, S. S.; Klebanov, B. M.; Herzig, S. J. Fluorine Chem. 2001, 109, 87–94. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(01)00382-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. SmithKline Beckman Corp. JP Patent 62,158,256, 1987.
    Chem. Abstr. 1988, 108, 131604w.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Ayerst, McKenna and Harrison, Inc. Canada Patent 1,248,127, 1989.
    Chem. Abstr. 1989, 111, 174666x.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Boiko, V. N.; Shchupak, G. M.; Karabanov, Yu. V. et al. USSR Patent 1,746,663, 1994.
    Chem. Abstr. 1995, 123, 308709x.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  10. Dashevskaya, T. A.; Shalamay, A. S.; Shchupak, G. M.; Boiko, V. N., et at. USSR Patent 1,304,353, 1987.
    Otkrytiya, Izobret., 1987, 14, 255.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  11. Gubnitskaya, E. S.; Boiko, V. N.; Kremlev, M. M. USSR Patent 1,839,443, 1993.
    Chem. Abstr. 1996, 124, 261367n.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Mizerski, A.; Gajadhur, A.; Pioro, S.; Ochal, Z. Chem. Environ. Res. 2002, 11, 47–61.
    Chem. Abstr. 2004, 140, 27628g.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Keil, S.; Wendler, W.; Glien, M.; Goerlitzer, J.; Chandross, K.; McGarry, D. G.; Merrill, J.; Bernardelli, P.; Ronan, B.; Terrier, C. Eur. Patent 1,586,573, 2005.
    Chem. Abstr. 2005, 143, 387044r.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Gaudilliere, B.; Jacobelli, H. WO Patent 2,004,321, 2003.
    Chem. Abstr. 2004, 140, 59649f.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Dalton, J. T.; Miller, D. D.; Yin, D.; He, Y. U.S. Patent 232,792, 2003.
    Chem. Abstr. 2004, 140, 41912b.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Dalton, J. T.; Miller, D. D.; He, Y.; Yin, D. U.S. Patent 14,975, 2004.
    Chem. Abstr. 2004, 140, 111132y.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Branstetter, B. J.; Breitenbucher, J. G.; Lebsack, A. D.; Liu, J.; Rech, J. C.; Xiao, W. U.S. Patent 156,599, 2009.
    Chem. Abstr. 2009, 151, 56868t.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Kompella, A. K.; Adibhatla, K. S.; Bhujanga, R.; Rachakonda, S.; Venkaiah, C. N. U.S. Patent 306,100, 2008.
    Chem. Abstr. 2009, 150, 35385x.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Yagupolskii, L. M. In Aromatic and Heterocyclic Compounds with Fluorine-Containing Substituents; Markovskii, L. N., Ed.; Naukova Dumka: Kiev, USSR, 1988; pp 98–126.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Dolbier, W. R., Jr. Chem. Rev. 1996, 1557–1584. doi:10.1021/cr941142c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Brace, N. O. J. Fluorine Chem. 1999, 93, 1–25. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(98)00255-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Yoshida, M.; Kamigata, N.; Sawada, H.; Nakayama, M. J. Fluorine Chem. 1990, 49, 1–20. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)80359-0
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  23. Farnham, W. B. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 1633–1640. doi:10.1021/cr9411435
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Uno, H.; Suzukib, H. Synlett 1993, 91–96. doi:10.1055/s-1993-22361
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  25. Burton, D. J.; Yang, Z.-Y. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 189–275. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(01)88139-4
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  26. Haas, A.; Niemann, U. Adv. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem. 1976, 18, 143.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Langlois, B. R.; Billard, T. Synthesis 2003, 185–194. doi:10.1055/s-2003-36812
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  28. Prakash, G. K. S.; Mandal, M. J. Fluorine Chem. 2001, 112, 123–131. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(01)00477-8
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  29. Adams, D. J.; Clark, J. H.; Heath, P. A.; Hansen, L. B.; Sanders, V. C.; Tavener, S. J. J. Fluorine Chem. 2000, 101, 187–191. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(99)00157-8
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  30. Singh, R. P.; Shreeve, J. M. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 7613–7632. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(00)00550-0
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  31. Furin, G. G. Zh. Org. Khim. 1997, 33, 1287–1319.
    Chem. Abstr. 1998, 129, 135686f. Russ. J. Org. Chem.1997, 33, 1209–1242.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  32. Prakash, G. K. S.; Yudin, A. K. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 757–786. doi:10.1021/cr9408991
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  33. Umemoto, T. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 1757–1778. doi:10.1021/cr941149u
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  34. Huang, W.-Y. J. Fluorine Chem. 1992, 58, 1–8. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)82787-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Koshechko, V. G.; Kiprianova, L. A. Theor. Exp. Chem. 1999, 35, 17–34. doi:10.1007/BF02511124
    in Russian; Chem. Abstr., 1999, 131, 304443y; Theor. Exp. Chem. 1999, 35, 18–36 (Eng. Ed.).
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  36. McClinton, M. A.; McClinton, D. A. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 6555–6666. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(01)80011-9
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Barbor, A. K.; Belf, L. I.; Bekston, M. V. In Uspekhi Khimii Ftora; Sergeev, A. P., Ed.; Khimiya: Leningrad, 1970; Vol. 3–4, pp 90–193.
    translation from Advances in Fluorine Chemistry; Stacey, M.; Tatlow, J. C.; Sharpe, A. G., Ed.; Butterworths Scientific Publication: London, 1963–1965; Vol. 3–4.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. I. G. Farbenind. Patent D.R.P. 682,971, 1936.
    Blst. 1965, 6, III, 1009, 1033, 1034, 1038, 1067.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  39. Muller, F.; Scherer, O.; Schumacher, W. Patent US 2,108,606, 1938.
    Chem. Abstr. 1938, 32, 2958.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  40. I.G. Farbenindustrie. Fr. Patent 820,796, 1937.
    Zbl. 1938, 1, 1876.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  41. Gregory, W. A. U.S. Patent 2,763,692, 1956.
    Chem. Abstr. 1957, 51, 4429c.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  42. Gregory, W. G. U.S. Patent 2,776,992, 1957.
    Chem. Abstr. 1957, 51, 15571c.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  43. Buchanan, J. B.; Gregory, W. A. U.S. Patent 3,061,645, 1962.
    Chem. Abstr. 1963, 58, 10127d.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  44. Nodiff, E. A.; Lipsehutz, S.; Craig, P. N.; Gordon, M. J. Org. Chem. 1960, 25, 60–65. doi:10.1021/jo01071a018
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  45. Yagupolskii, L. M.; Marenets, M. S. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1956, 26, 101–107.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Yagupolskii, L. M.; Kiprianov, A. I. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1952, 22, 2216–2220.
    Chem. Abstr. 1953, 47, 4771a.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  47. Yagupolskii, L. M.; Marenets, M. S. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1954, 24, 887–894.
    Chem. Abstr. 1955, 49, 8172e; J. Gen. Chem. U.S.S.R. 1954, 24, 885–891.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Yagupolskii, L. M.; Gandelsman, L. Z.; Trushanina, L. I. Ukr. Khim. Zh. 1965, 31, 1301–1305.
    Chem. Abstr. 1966, 64, 14315g.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  49. Yagupolskii, L. M.; Marenets, M. S. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1959, 29, 278–283.
    Chem. Abstr. 1959, 53, 21765i.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  50. Yagupolskii, L. M.; Gruz, B. E. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1961, 31, 1315–1320.
    Chem. Abstr. 1961, 55, 24720i.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  51. Gandelsman, L. Z.; Mostoslavskaya, E. I.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Ukr. Khim. Zh. 1975, 41, 61–66.
    Chem. Abstr. 1975, 82, 172578d.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  52. Yagupolskii, L. M.; Orda, V. V. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1964, 34, 1979–1984.
    Chem. Abstr. 1964, 61, 8217b.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  53. Yagupolskii, L. M.; Boiko, V. N. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1969, 39, 195–198.
    Chem. Abstr. 1969, 70, 96324c.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  54. Tohyama, Y.; Kanematsu, K.; PCT Int. Appl. WO 8,287, 2009.
    Chem. Abstr. 2009, 150, 144137p.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  55. Yagupolskii, L. M.; D′yachenko, E. B.; Troitskaya, V. I. Ukr. Khim. Zh. 1961, 27, 77–79.
    Chem. Abstr. 1961, 55, 21029a.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  56. Ponticello, G. S.; Hartman, R. D.; Lumma, W. C.; Baldwin, J. J. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 3080–3082. doi:10.1021/jo01331a026
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  57. Knunyants, I. L.; Fokin, A. V. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim. 1952, 2, 261–267.
    Chem. Abstr. 1953, 47, 3221b.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  58. England, D. C.; Melby, L. R.; Dietrich, M. A.; Lindsey, R. V., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 5116–5122. doi:10.1021/ja01504a026
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  59. Langlois, B.; Desbois, M. Actual. Chim. 1987, 5, 151–158.
    Chem. Abstr. 1988, 108, 149998n.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  60. Wakselman, C.; Kaziz, C. J. Fluorine Chem. 1986, 33, 347–359.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  61. Umemoto, T.; Ishihara, S. J. Fluorine Chem. 1998, 92, 181–187. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(98)00276-0
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  62. Guo, Y.; Chen, Q.-Y. J. Fluorine Chem. 2000, 102, 105–109. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(99)00228-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  63. Xing-ya, L.; He-qi, P.; Wei-min, F.; Xi-kui, J. J. Fluorine Chem. 1986, 31, 213–229. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)80535-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  64. Li, X.-y.; Jiang, X.-k.; Pan, H.-q.; Hu, J.-s.; Fu, W.-m. Pure Appl. Chem. 1987, 59, 1015–1020. doi:10.1351/pac198759081015
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  65. Suda, M.; Hino, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 1997–2000. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)92888-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  66. Siegrist, U.; Intermuehle, J.; Baumeister, P. Eur. Patent 168,344, 1986.
    Chem. Abstr. 1986, 105, 60409.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  67. Gassen, K. R.; Marhold, A. Ger. Patent 3,835,200, 1990.
    Chem. Abstr. 1990, 113, 211569g.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  68. Jouen, C.; Lasne, M. C.; Pommelet, J. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 2413–2416. doi:10.1016/0040-4039(96)00186-4
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  69. Richert, H. Belg. Patent 624,397, 1963.
    Chem. Abstr. 1963, 59, 305.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  70. Andreades, S.; Harris, J. F., Jr.; Sheppard, W. A. J. Org. Chem. 1964, 29, 898–900. doi:10.1021/jo01027a034
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  71. Lee, H.-S.; Geng, L.; Skotheim, T. WO Patent 96/29,753, 1996.
    U.S. Patent 5,538,812, 1996; Chem. Abstr. 1996, 125, 147119d.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  72. Scribner, R. M. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 3671–3682. doi:10.1021/jo01349a044
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  73. Scribner, R. M. U.S. Patent 3,381,020, 1968.
    Chem. Abstr. 1968, 69, 76945g.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  74. Croft, T. S. Phosphorus Sulfur Relat. Elem. 1976, 2, 133–139. doi:10.1080/03086647608078938
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  75. Croft, T. S. Phosphorus Sulfur Relat. Elem. 1976, 2, 129–132. doi:10.1080/03086647608078937
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  76. Emeléus, H. J.; Nabi, S. N. J. Chem. Soc. 1960, 1103–1108.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  77. Haas, A.; Hellwig, V. J. Fluorine Chem. 1975, 6, 521–532. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)81691-7
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  78. Sheppard, W. A. J. Org. Chem. 1964, 29, 895–898. doi:10.1021/jo01027a033
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  79. Popov, V. I.; Kondranenko, N. V.; Haas, A. Ukr. Khim. Zh. 1983, 49, 861–863.
    Chem. Abstr. 1983, 99, 194535r.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  80. Haas, A.; Niemann, U. Chem. Ber. 1977, 110, 67–77. doi:10.1002/cber.19771100108
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  81. Mirek, J.; Haas, A. J. Fluorine Chem. 1981, 19, 67–70. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)85240-9
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  82. Gerstenberger, M. R. C.; Haas, A.; Liebig, F. J. Fluorine Chem. 1982, 19, 461–474. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)83146-2
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  83. Croft, T. S.; McBrady, J. J. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1975, 12, 845–849. doi:10.1002/jhet.5570120507
    Chem. Abstr. 1976, 84, 43948s.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  84. Gerstenberger, M. R. C.; Haas, A. J. Fluorine Chem. 1983, 23, 525–540. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)85137-4
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  85. Haas, A.; Hellwig, V. Chem. Ber. 1976, 109, 2475–2484. doi:10.1002/cber.19761090715
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  86. Haas, A.; Niemann, U. J. Fluorine Chem. 1978, 11, 509–518. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)82464-1
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  87. Dorn, S.; Eggenberg, P.; Gerstenberger, M. R. C.; Haas, A.; Niemann, U.; Zobrist, P. Helv. Chim. Acta 1979, 62, 1442–1450. doi:10.1002/hlca.19790620508
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  88. Clark, N. K. In Uspekhi Khimii Ftora; Sergeev, A. P., Ed.; Khimiya: Leningrad, 1970; Vol. 3–4, pp 43–48.
    translation from Advances in Fluorine Chemistry; Stacey, M.; Tatlow, J. C.; Sharpe, A. G., Ed.; Butterworths Scientific Publication: London, 1963–1965; Vol. 3–4.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  89. Man, E. H.; Coffman, D. D.; Muetterties, E. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 3575–3577. doi:10.1021/ja01523a023
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  90. Emeléus, H. J.; MacDuffie, D. E. J. Chem. Soc. 1961, 2597–2599.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  91. Orda, V. V.; Yagupolskii, L. M.; Bystrov, V. F.; Stepanyants, A. U. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1965, 35, 1628–1635.
    Chem. Abstr. 1965, 63, 17861c.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  92. Harris, J. F., Jr. J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 2063–2074. doi:10.1021/jo01282a004
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  93. Yagupolskii, L. M.; Kondratenko, N. V.; Sambur, V. P. Synthesis 1975, 721–723. doi:10.1055/s-1975-23905
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
  94. Kondratenko, N. V.; Kolomeytsev, A. A.; Popov, V. I.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Synthesis 1985, 667–669. doi:10.1055/s-1985-31301
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  95. Oksengendler, I. G.; Kondratenko, N. V.; Luk′yanets, E. A.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Zh. Org. Khim. 1978, 14, 1046–1051.
    Chem. Abstr. 1978, 89, 112289v.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  96. Kolomeitsev, A. A.; Kondratenko, N. V.; Popov, V. I.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Zh. Org. Khim. 1983, 19, 2631–2632.
    Chem. Abstr. 1984, 100, 209281v.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  97. Pazenok, S. V.; Kondratenko, N. V.; Popov, V. I.; Troitskaya, V. I.; Il′chenko, A. Ya.; Al′perovich, M. A.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1983, 1493–1499.
    Chem. Abstr. 1984, 100, 53186e.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  98. Boiko, V. N.; Shchupak, G. M.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Zh. Org. Khim. 1980, 16, 995–1001.
    Chem. Abstr. 1980, 93, 167794u.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  99. Yagupolskii, L. M.; Sambur, V. P.; Kondratenko, N. V. USSR Patent 462826, 1975.
    Otkrytiya, Izobret., Prom. Obraztsy 1975, 9, 60; Chem. Abstr. 1975, 83, 42811j.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  100. Clark, J. H.; Jones, C. W.; Kybett, A. P.; McClinton, M. A.; Miller, J. M.; Bishop, D.; Blade, R. J. J. Fluorine Chem. 1990, 48, 249–253. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)80437-6
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  101. Remy, D. C.; Rittle, K. E.; Hunt, C. A.; Freedman, M. B. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 1644–1646. doi:10.1021/jo00871a037
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  102. Remy, D. C.; Freedman, M. B. U.S. Patent 4,020,169, 1977.
    Chem. Abstr. 1977, 87, 52939d.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  103. Munavalli, S.; Rossman, D. I.; Rohrbaugh, D. K.; Ferguson, C. P.; Hsu, F.-L. Heteroat. Chem. 1992, 3, 189–192. doi:10.1002/hc.520030216
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  104. Munavalli, S.; Hassner, A.; Rossman, D. I.; Singh, S.; Rohrbaugh, D. K.; Ferguson, C. P. J. Fluorine Chem. 1995, 73, 7–11. doi:10.1016/0022-1139(94)03209-I
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  105. Kitazume, T.; Ishikawa, N. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1975, 48, 361–362. doi:10.1246/bcsj.48.361
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  106. Chen, Q.-Y.; Duan, J.-X. Chem. Commun. 1993, 918–919.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  107. Kolomeitsev, A.; Medebielle, M.; Kirsch, P.; Lork, E.; Roschenthaler, G.-V. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 2183–2185.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  108. Haas, A.; Klug, W. Chem. Ber. 1968, 101, 2609–2616. doi:10.1002/cber.19681010802
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  109. Dmowski, W.; Haas, A. Chimia 1985, 39, 185.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  110. Dmowski, W.; Haas, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1987, 2119–2124.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  111. Dmowski, W.; Haas, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1988, 1179–1181.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  112. Petrova, T. D.; Platonov, V. E.; Shchegoleva, L. N.; Maksimov, A. M.; Haas, A.; Schelvis, M.; Lieb, M. J. Fluorine Chem. 1996, 79, 13–25. doi:10.1016/0022-1139(96)03465-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  113. Clark, J. H.; Tavener, S. J. J. Fluorine Chem. 1997, 85, 169–172. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(97)00057-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  114. Tavener, S. J.; Adams, D. J.; Clark, J. H. J. Fluorine Chem. 1999, 95, 171–176. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(99)00063-9
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  115. Tyrra, W.; Naumann, D.; Hoge, B.; Yagupolskii, Yu. L. J. Fluorine Chem. 2003, 119, 101–107. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(02)00276-2
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  116. Jellinek, F. Proc. Chem. Soc., London 1959, 319–320.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  117. Jellinek, F.; Lagowski, J. J. J. Chem. Soc. 1960, 810–814.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  118. Adams, D. J.; Clark, J. H. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1456–1460. doi:10.1021/jo9915933
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  119. Haas, A.; Heuduk, H.; Monsé, C.; Yagupolskii, L. M. J. Fluorine Chem. 1999, 94, 195–198. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(99)00014-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  120. Kondratenko, N. V.; Sambur, V. P. Ukr. Khim. Zh. 1975, 41, 516–519.
    Chem. Abstr. 1975, 83, 58321k.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  121. Adams, D. J.; Goddard, A.; Clark, J. H.; Macquarrie, D. J. Chem. Commun. 2000, 987–988. doi:10.1039/b002560g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  122. Banus, J.; Emeléus, H. J.; Haszeldine, R. N. J. Chem. Soc. 1951, 60–64. doi:10.1039/jr9510000060
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  123. Pierce, O. R.; McBee, E. T.; Judd, G. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 474–478. doi:10.1021/ja01631a042
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  124. McBee, E. T.; Roberts, C. W.; Curtis, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 6387–6390. doi:10.1021/ja01628a105
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  125. Chambers, R. D.; Musgrave, W. K. R.; Savory, J. J. Chem. Soc. 1962, 1993–1999.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  126. Johncock, P. J. Organomet. Chem. 1969, 19, 257–265. doi:10.1016/S0022-328X(00)85296-1
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  127. Lagowskii, J. J. Q. Rev., Chem. Soc. 1959, 13, 233–264.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  128. Pouling, L. In Obschaya Khimiya; Karapet′yants, M. Kh., Ed.; Mir: Moscow, 1974; p 168.
    translation from Pouling, L. General Chemistry, W. H. Freeman and Co; San-Francisco, 1970.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  129. Haley, B.; Haszeldine, R. N.; Hewitson, B.; Tipping, A. E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1976, 525–532.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  130. Haszeldine, R. N.; Higginbottom, B.; Rigby, R. B.; Tipping, A. E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1972, 155–159.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  131. Haszeldine, R. N.; Rigby, R. B.; Tipping, A. E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1972, 159–161.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  132. Huyser, E. S.; Bedard, E. J. Org. Chem. 1964, 29, 1588–1590. doi:10.1021/jo01029a077
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  133. Kimoto, H.; Fujii, S.; Cohen, L. A. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 2867–2872. doi:10.1021/jo00136a010
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  134. Kornblum, N.; Davies, T. M.; Earl, G. W.; Holy, N. L.; Kerber, R. C.; Musser, M. T.; Snow, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 725–727. doi:10.1021/ja00979a067
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  135. Kornblum, N.; Davies, T. M.; Earl, G. W.; Greene, G. S.; Holy, N. L.; Kerber, R. C.; Manthey, J. W.; Musser, M. T.; Snow, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 5714–5715. doi:10.1021/ja00998a045
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  136. Kornblum, N.; Boyd, S. D.; Ono, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 2580–2587. doi:10.1021/ja00815a043
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  137. Kornblum, N. Angew. Chem. 1975, 87, 797–808. doi:10.1002/ange.19750872204
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  138. Bunnett, J. F.; Kim, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 7463–7464. doi:10.1021/ja00728a037
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  139. Bunnett, J. F.; Kim, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 7464–7466. doi:10.1021/ja00728a038
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  140. Bunnett, J. F.; Creary, X. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 3173–3174. doi:10.1021/jo00935a037
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  141. Bunnett, J. F.; Creary, X. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 3611–3612. doi:10.1021/jo00938a044
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  142. Bunnett, J. F.; Creary, X. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 3740–3743. doi:10.1021/jo00913a026
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  143. Boiko, V. N.; Shchupak, G. M.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Zh. Org. Khim. 1977, 13, 1057–1061.
    Chem. Abstr. 1977, 87, 134226h.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
  144. Popov, V. I.; Boiko, V. N.; Kondratenko, N. V.; Sambur, V. P.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Zh. Org. Khim. 1977, 13, 2135–2138.
    Chem. Abstr. 1978, 88, 104823d.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  145. Boiko, V. N.; Dashevskaya, T. A.; Shchupak, G. M.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Zh. Org. Khim. 1979, 15, 396–400.
    Chem. Abstr. 1979, 91, 20439g.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  146. Boiko, V. N.; Shchupak, G. M.; Popov, V. I.; Orlova, R. K.; Yagupol'skii, L. M. USSR Patent 687,067, 1979.
    Chem. Abstr. 1980, 92, 22503t.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
  147. Voloshchuk, V. G.; Boiko, V. N.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Zh. Org. Khim. 1977, 13.
    Chem. Abstr. 1978, 88, 6483y.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  148. Kondratenko, N. V.; Popov, V. I.; Kolomeitsev, A. A.; Sadekov, I. D.; Minkin, V. I.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Zh. Org. Khim. 1979, 15, 1561–1562.
    Chem. Abstr. 1979, 91, 174948j.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  149. Boiko, V. N.; Shchupak, G. M.; Kirii, N. V.; Kharchuk, A. N. USSR Patent 1,782,002, 2004.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  150. Kondratenko, N. V.; Yurchenko, L. G.; Matyushecheva, G. I. Ukr. Khim. Zh. 1981, 47, 871–874.
    Chem. Abstr. 1981, 95, 186790x.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  151. Kondratenko, N. V.; Kolomeitsev, A. A.; Popov, V. I.; Il′chenko, A. Ya. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1983, 53, 2500–2505.
    Chem. Abstr. 1984, 100, 50987f.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  152. Kondratenko, N. V.; Popov, V. I.; Kolomeitsev, A. A.; Saenko, E. P.; Prezhdo, V. V.; Lutskii, A. E.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Zh. Org. Khim. 1980, 16, 1215–1221.
    Chem. Abstr. 1980, 93, 185545t.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  153. Fugitt, R. B.; Luckenbaugh, R. W. Analogifremgangsmaate for fremstilling av terapeutisk virksomme 3-(p-alkylsulfonylfenyl)-oxa-zolidinon-derivater. NO Patent 156792, Aug 17, 1987.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  154. Fedyuk, D. V.; Maletina, I. I.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Ukr. Khim. Zh. 1997, 63, 29–39.
    Chem. Abstr. 1999, 130, 182407w.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
  155. Fisher, I. P.; Homer, J. B.; Lossing, F. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 957–960. doi:10.1021/ja01083a003
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  156. Rempel, G. D.; Borisov, Yu. A.; Rayevskii, N. I.; Igumnov, S. M.; Rozhkov, I. N. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim. 1990, 1064–1068.
    Chem. Abstr. 1990, 113, 96744w.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  157. Gandel′sman, L. Z.; Boiko, V. N. Ukr. Khim. Zh. 1977, 43, 1224–1225.
    Chem. Abstr. 1978, 88, 89253x.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  158. Boiko, V. N.; Kirii, N. V.; Shchupak, G. M. UA Patent 6205, 1994.
    Promyslova Vlasnist 1994, 8-I, 3.142; Chem. Abstr. 1996, 124, 116859v.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  159. Boiko, V. N.; Kirii, N. V.; Shchupak, G. M. RU Patent 2030397, 1995.
    Chem. Abstr. 1996, 124, 116859v.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  160. Uneyama, K.; Kitagawa, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 375–378. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)92632-7
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  161. Uneyama, K.; Kanai, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 7425–7426. doi:10.1016/0040-4039(91)80124-O
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  162. Boiko, V. N.; Shchupak, G. M.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Zh. Org. Khim. 1985, 21, 1470–1477.
    Chem. Abstr. 1986, 104, 206815u.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  163. Boiko, V. N.; Shchupak, G. M.; Ignat’ev, N. V.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Zh. Org. Khim. 1979, 15, 1245–1253.
    Chem. Abstr. 1979, 91, 157378f.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  164. Havinga, E.; Kronenberg, M. E. Pure Appl.Chem. 1968, 16, 137–152. doi:10.1351/pac196816010137
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  165. Yavorskii, A. E.; Stetsenko, A. V.; Gogoman, I. V.; Boiko, V. N. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1988, 632–636.
    Chem. Abstr. 1989, 110, 114751r.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  166. Laser, E. S.; Matteo, M. R.; Possanza, G. J. J. Med. Chem. 1987, 30, 726–729. doi:10.1021/jm00387a026
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  167. Popov, V. I.; Boiko, V. N.; Yagupolskii, L. M. J. Fluorine Chem. 1982, 21, 365–369. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)81521-3
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
  168. Huebl, D.; Puttner, R.; Richter, E.; Pieroh, E.-A. 2-Imino-1,3-dithietanes, their preparation and their use as pesticides. DE Patent 3703213, Aug 11, 1988.
    Chem. Abstr. 1988, 109, 170410v.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  169. Chen, Q.-Y.; Chen, M.-J. J. Fluorine Chem. 1991, 51, 21–32. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)80303-6
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
  170. Rico, I.; Cantacuzene, D.; Wakselman, C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 1979–1982. doi:10.1021/jo00160a007
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  171. Rico, I.; Wakselman, C. J. Fluorine Chem. 1982, 20, 759–764. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)81443-8
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  172. Patric, S. In Uspekhy Khim. Ftora; Sergeev, A. P., Ed.; Khimia: Moscow, 1964; Vol. I-II, p 360.
    Translation from Advances in Fluorine Chemistry, Butterworths Science Publ.: London, U.K., 1960–1961; Vol. I–II.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  173. Andrieux, C. P.; Gelis, L.; Medebielle, M.; Pinson, J.; Saveant, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3509–3520. doi:10.1021/ja00165a040
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  174. Ignat′ev, N. V.; Boiko, V. N.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Zh. Org. Khim. 1985, 21, 653.
    Chem. Abstr. 1985, 103, 141549t.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  175. Ignat′ev, N. V.; Boiko, V. N.; Yagupolskii, L. M. USSR Patent 1167181, 1985.
    Otkrytiya, Izobret., Prom. Obraztsy 1985, 26, 108.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  176. Wakselman, C.; Tordeux, M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 793–794. doi:10.1039/C39840000793
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  177. Tordeux, M.; Wakselman, C. Procede de preparation de perhalogenoalkylthioethers. FR Patent 2540108, Dec 27, 1985.
    Chem.Abstr. 1985, 102, 45480x.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  178. Wakselman, C.; Tordeux, M. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 4047–4051. doi:10.1021/jo00221a017
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  179. Boiko, V. N.; Shchupak, G. M.; Kirij, N. V. Ukr. Khim. Zh. 2001, 67, 51–54.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  180. Bunnett, J. F.; Scamehorn, R. G.; Traber, R. P. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 3677–3682. doi:10.1021/jo00885a005
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  181. Koshechko, V. G.; Kiprianova, L. A.; Fileleeva, L. I.; Boiko, V. N. In Abstracts of Papers, 6th Vsesoyuznaya konferentsiya po organicheskoi khimii, Oct 10–14, 1988; Chernovtsy, Ukraine; p 182.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  182. Ignat′ev, N. V.; Datsenko, S. D.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Zh. Org. Khim. 1991, 27, 905–910.
    Chem. Abstr. 1992, 116, 58861m.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
  183. Datsenko, S. D.; Ignat′ev, N. V.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Elektrokhimiya 1991, 27, 1674–1676.
    Chem. Abstr. 1992, 116, 115486u.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  184. Medebielle, M.; Pinson, J.; Saveant, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6872–6879. doi:10.1021/ja00018a025
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  185. Kitazume, T.; Ikeya, T. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 2349–2350. doi:10.1021/jo00245a040
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  186. Koshechko, V. G.; Kiprianova, L. A.; Fileleeva, L. I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6677–6678. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)61016-X
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  187. Petrov, V. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3267–3269. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)00447-6
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  188. Feiring, A. E. J. Fluorine Chem. 1984, 24, 191–203. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)85203-3
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
  189. Boiko, V. N.; Shchupak, G. M. J. Fluorine Chem. 1994, 69, 207–212. doi:10.1016/0022-1139(94)03132-0
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
  190. Wakselman, C.; Tordeux, M. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1986, 868–870.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  191. Tordeux, M.; Langlois, B.; Wakselman, C. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 2452–2453. doi:10.1021/jo00271a041
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  192. Tordeux, M.; Langlois, B.; Wakselman, C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1990, 2293–2299. doi:10.1039/P19900002293
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  193. Clavel, J. L.; Langlois, B.; Nantermet, R.; Tordeux, M.; Wakselman, C. Process for the preparation of perhalogen alkyl thio ethers. EU Patent 374061, June 20, 1990.
    Chem.Abstr. 1991, 114, 5483s.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  194. Folest, J.-C.; Nédélec, J.-Y.; Périchon, J. Synth. Commun. 1988, 18, 1491–1494. doi:10.1080/00397918808081305
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  195. Andrieux, C. P.; Gelis, L.; Saveant, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 786–791. doi:10.1021/ja00158a044
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  196. Wakselman, C.; Tordeux, M.; Clavel, J.-L.; Langlois, B. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1991, 993–994. doi:10.1039/C39910000993
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  197. Clavel, J.-L.; Langlois, B.; Nantermet, R.; Tordeux, M.; Wakselman, C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1992, 3371–3375. doi:10.1039/P19920003371
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  198. Magnier, E.; Vit, E.; Wakselman, C. Synlett 2001, 1260–1262. doi:10.1055/s-2001-16050
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  199. Koshechko, V. G.; Kiprianova, L. A.; Fileleeva, L. I.; Rozhkova, Z. Z. Teor. Eksp. Khim. 1993, 29, 244–249.
    Chem. Abstr. 1994, 121, 120151p.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  200. Koshechko, V. G.; Kiprianova, L. A.; Fileleeva, L. I.; Rozhkova, Z. Z. J. Fluorine Chem. 1995, 70, 277–278. doi:10.1016/0022-1139(94)03128-M
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  201. Joglekar, B.; Miyake, T.; Kawase, R.; Shibata, K.; Muramatsu, H.; Matsui, M. J. Fluorine Chem. 1995, 74, 123–126. doi:10.1016/0022-1139(95)03261-B
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  202. Koshechko, V. G.; Kiprianova, L. A.; Fileleeva, L. I.; Tsanov, K. G. J. Fluorine Chem. 1999, 96, 163–166. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(99)00069-X
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  203. Koshechko, V. G.; Kiprianova, L. A.; Fileleeva, L. I.; Kalinina, L. I. J. Fluorine Chem. 2007, 128, 1376–1378. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2007.06.006
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  204. Feiring, A. E.; Wonchoba, E. R.; Arthur, S. D. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. Ed. 1990, 28, 2809–2819. doi:10.1002/pola.1990.080281018
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  205. Su, D.; Chen, Q.; Zhu, R. Youji Huaxue 1986, 112–120.
    Chem. Abstr. 1986, 105, 225915p.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  206. Nishi, M.; Narita, K. Production of aminophenyl alkyl sulfide. JP Patent 10291973, Nov 4, 1998.
    Chem.Abstr. 1999, 130, 3685r.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  207. Ward, W.; Sicree, S.; Chen, B.; Tamborski, C. J. Fluorine Chem. 1995, 73, 73–77. doi:10.1016/0022-1139(94)03200-J
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  208. Wakselman, C. J. Fluorine Chem. 1992, 59, 367–378. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)80331-0
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  209. Rozhkov, I. N.; Igumnov, S. M.; Becker, G. Ya.; Pletn′ev, S. I. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim. 1989, 2222–2224.
    Chem. Abstr. 1990, 112, 76153d.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  210. Kobayashi, Y.; Kumadaki, I.; Ohsawa, A.; Murakami, S.-I.; Nakano, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1978, 26, 1247–1249.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  211. Haszeldine, R. N.; Rigby, R. B.; Tipping, A. E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1972, 2180–2182. doi:10.1039/P19720002180
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  212. Sagami Chemical Research Center. JP Patent 81122344, 1981.
    Chem. Abstr. 1982, 96, 85048b.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  213. Umemoto, T.; Miyano, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 3929–3930. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)87745-X
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  214. Umemoto, T.; Ando, A. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1986, 59, 447–452. doi:10.1246/bcsj.59.447
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  215. Sekiya, A.; Umemoto, T. Chem. Lett. 1982, 11, 1519–1520. doi:10.1246/cl.1982.1519
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  216. Barton, D. H. R.; Lacher, B.; Zard, S. Z. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 2325–2328. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(01)90613-1
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  217. Barton, D. H. R.; Lacher, B.; Zard, S. Z. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 4321–4328. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(01)90307-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  218. Billard, T.; Roques, N.; Langlois, B. R. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 3813–3820. doi:10.1021/jo980649a
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  219. Billard, T.; Roques, N.; Langlois, B. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3069–3072. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)00337-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  220. Tanabe, Y.; Matsuo, N.; Ohno, N. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 4582–4585. doi:10.1021/jo00254a033
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  221. Sipyagin, A. M.; Pomytkin, I. A.; Pal′tsun, S. V.; Aleinikov, N. N.; Kartsev, V. G. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1990, 311, 1137–1139.
    Chem. Abstr. 1990, 113, 152212k.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  222. Sipyagin, A. M.; Pomytkin, I. A.; Pal′tsun, S. V.; Aleinikov, N. N. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1994, 58–62.
    Chem. Abstr. 1995, 122, 31274j.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  223. Sipyagin, A. M.; Enshov, V. S.; Boiko, G. N.; Lebedev, A. T.; Karakhanova, N. K. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 2003, 1698–1706.
    In Russian.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  224. Sipyagin, A. M.; Efremov, I. V.; Pomytkin, I. A.; Kashtanov, S. A.; Aleinikov, N. N. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1994, 1291–1292.
    Chem. Abstr. 1995, 122, 239503r.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  225. Enshov, V. S.; Kashtanov, S. A.; Efremov, I. V.; Pomytkin, I. A.; Sipyagin, A. M. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1995, 1703.
    Chem. Abstr. 1996, 125, 33451a.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  226. Sipyagin, A. M.; Enshov, V. S.; Lebedev, A. T.; Karakhanova, N. K. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 2003, 1173–1180.
    In Russian.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  227. Sipyagin, A. M.; Enshov, V. S.; Kashtanov, S. A.; Treshcher, D. S. Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin. 2002, 1559–1565.
    In Russian.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  228. Clavel, J.-L.; Langlois, B.; Laurent, E.; Roidot, N. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 1991, 59, 169–172. doi:10.1080/10426509108045716
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  229. Clavel, J.-L.; Laurent, E.; Langlois, B.; Roidot, N. Reagent and process for the perfluoroalkylation of nucleophilic substrates by sodium perfluoroalkanesulfinates in an oxidising medium. EP Patent 458684, May 17, 1991.
    Chem. Abstr. 1992, 116, 127821n.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  230. Kirij, N. V.; Pasenok, S. V.; Yagupolskii, Yu. L.; Tyrra, W.; Naumann, D. J. Fluorine Chem. 2000, 106, 217–221. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)00339-0
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  231. Kondratenko, N. V.; Popov, V. I.; Yurchenko, L. G.; Kolomeitsev, A. A.; Yagupolskii, L. M. Zh. Org. Khim. 1978, 14, 1914–1917.
    Chem. Abstr. 1979, 90, 54603a.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  232. Zeifman, Yu. V.; Lantseva, L. T.; Knunyants, I. L. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim. 1978, 2640–2643.
    Chem. Abstr. 1979, 91, 56281p.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  233. Suzuki, H.; Satake, H.; Uno, H.; Shimizu, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1987, 60, 4471–4473. doi:10.1246/bcsj.60.4471
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  234. Suzuki, H.; Uno, H.; Shimizu, H.; Nemoto, F. Production of perfluoroalkylaryl sulfide. JP Patent 6354357, March 8, 1988.
    Chem. Abstr. 1988, 109, 73127a.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  235. Zeifman, Yu. V.; Lantseva, L. T.; Knunyants, I. L. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim. 1978, 1229.
    Chem. Abstr. 1978, 89, 146381j.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  236. Zeifman, Yu. V.; Lantseva, L. T. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim. 1980, 1102–1106.
    Chem. Abstr. 1980, 93, 113882c.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  237. Nguyen, T.; Rubinstein, M.; Wakselman, C. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 1938–1940. doi:10.1021/jo00322a047
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  238. Tordeux, M.; Francese, C.; Wakselman, C. J. Fluorine Chem. 1989, 43, 27–34. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)81634-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  239. Pooput, C.; Médebielle, M.; Dolbier, W. R., Jr.. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 301–303. doi:10.1021/ol036303q
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  240. Pooput, C.; Dolbier, W. R., Jr..; Médebielle, M. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 3564–3568. doi:10.1021/jo060250j
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  241. Billard, T.; Langlois, B. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6865–6868. doi:10.1016/0040-4039(96)01530-4
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  242. Quiclet-Sire, B.; Saicic, R. N.; Zard, S. Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 9057–9058. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(96)02127-2
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
  243. Russell, J.; Roques, N. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 13771–13782. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(98)00846-1
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
  244. Large, S.; Roques, N.; Langlois, B. R. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 8848–8856. doi:10.1021/jo000150s
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
  245. Roques, N. J. Fluorine Chem. 2001, 107, 311–314. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)00374-2
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
  246. Blond, G.; Billard, T.; Langlois, B. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 2473–2475. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)00225-8
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  247. Inschauspe, D.; Sortais, J.-B.; Billard, T.; Langlois, B. R. Synlett 2003, 233–235. doi:10.1055/s-2003-36788
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  248. Prakash, G. K. S.; Hu, J.; Olah, G. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3253–3256. doi:10.1021/ol035045u
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  249. Popkova, V. Y.; Marhold, A. Process for the preparation of perfluoalkylaryl sulfides and perfluoroalkylaryl sulfides per se. EP Patent 962450, Dec 8, 1999.
    Chem. Abstr. 2000, 132, 3248s.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  250. Hudlicky, M.; Pavlath, A. E., Eds. Chemistry of organic fluorine compounds II. A Critical Review (ACS Monograph 187); American Chemical Society: Washington, 1995; p 905.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  251. Lovelace, A. M.; Rausch, D. A.; Postelnek, M. In Aliphaticheskie fluorine-containing compounds; Knunyants, I. L., Ed.; Inostrannaya Literatura: Moscow, 1961; p 109.
    Translation from Aliphatic Fluorine compounds ACS Monograph Series: N.Y., London.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  252. Emeléus, H. J.; Haszeldine, R. N. J. Chem. Soc. 1949, 2953–2956. doi:10.1039/JR9490002953
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  253. Haszeldine, R. N. J. Chem. Soc. 1954, 1273–1279. doi:10.1039/JR9540001273
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  254. McBee, E. T.; Battershell, R. D.; Braendlin, H. P. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 1131–1133. doi:10.1021/jo01039a504
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  255. Emeléus, H. J.; Haszeldine, R. N. J. Chem. Soc. 1949, 2948–2952. doi:10.1039/JR9490002948
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  256. Burton, D. J.; Hahnfeld, J. L. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 828–831. doi:10.1021/jo00425a012
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  257. Schlosser, M.; Heinz, G.; Chau, L. V. Chem. Ber. 1971, 104, 1921–1933. doi:10.1002/cber.19711040632
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  258. Schlosser, M.; Heinz, G. Chem. Ber. 1971, 104, 1934–1941. doi:10.1002/cber.19711040633
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  259. Chang, Y.; Cai, C. J. Fluorine Chem. 2005, 126, 937–940. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2005.04.012
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  260. Folléas, B.; Marek, I.; Normant, J.-F.; Saint-Jalmes, L. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 275–283. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(99)00951-5
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  261. Shono, T.; Ishifune, M.; Okada, T.; Kashimura, S. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2–4. doi:10.1021/jo00001a002
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  262. Roques, N.; Russell, J. WO Appl. 9719038, 1997.
    Chem. Abstr. 1997, 127, 50384q.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  263. Folléas, B.; Marek, I.; Normant, J.-F.; Saint-Jalmes, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2973–2976. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(98)00391-8
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  264. Billard, T.; Langlois, B. R.; Blond, G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 1467–1471. doi:10.1002/1099-0690(200104)2001:8<1467::AID-EJOC1467>3.0.CO;2-A
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  265. Olah, G. A.; Chambers, R. D.; Prakash, G. K. S., Eds. Synthetic Fluorine Chemistry; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1992; p 402.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  266. Ruppert, I.; Schlich, K.; Volbach, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 2195–2198. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)80208-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  267. Kolomeitsev, A. A.; Movchun, V. N.; Kondratenko, N. V.; Yagupolskii, Yu. L. Synthesis 1990, 1151–1152. doi:10.1055/s-1990-27121
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  268. Patel, N. R.; Kirchmeier, R. L. Inorg Chem. 1992, 31, 2537–2540. doi:10.1021/ic00038a042
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  269. Singh, R. P.; Cao, G.; Kirchmeier, R. L.; Shreeve, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 2873–2876. doi:10.1021/jo982494c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  270. Movchun, V. N.; Kolomeitsev, A. A.; Yagupolskii, Yu. L. J. Fluorine Chem. 1995, 70, 255–257. doi:10.1016/0022-1139(94)03124-I
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  271. Billard, T.; Large, S.; Langlois, B. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 65–68. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(96)02216-2
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  272. Shein, S. M.; Krasnosel′skaya, M. I.; Boiko, V. N. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1966, 36, 2141–2147.
    Chem. Abstr. 1967, 66, 94446n.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  273. Steensma, R. W.; Galabi, S.; Tagat, J. R.; McCombie, S. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 2281–2283. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)00164-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  274. Barrera, M. D.; Cheburkov, Y.; Lamanna, W. M. J. Fluorine Chem. 2002, 117, 13–16. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(02)00170-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  275. Yagupolskii, L. M.; Maletina, I. I.; Kondratenko, N. V.; Orda, V. V. Synthesis. 1978, 835–837.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  276. Yagupolskii, L. M.; Mironova, A. A.; Maletina, I. I. Zh. Org. Khim. 1980, 16, 232–233.
    Chem. Abstr. 1980, 93, 26005a.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  277. Umemoto, T.; Kuriu, Y. Chem. Lett. 1982, 65–66. doi:10.1246/cl.1982.65
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  278. Eisenberger, P.; Gischig, S.; Togni, A. Chem.–Eur. J. 2006, 12, 2579–2586. doi:10.1002/chem.200501052
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  279. Kieltsch, I.; Eisenberger, P.; Togni, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 754–757. doi:10.1002/anie.200603497
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  280. Yagupolskii, L. M.; Kondratenko, N. V.; Timofeeva, G. N. Zh. Org. Khim. 1984, 20, 115–118.
    Chem. Abstr. 1984, 100, 191494e.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  281. Yang, J.-J.; Kirchmeier, R. L.; Shreeve, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2656–2660. doi:10.1021/jo972213l
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  282. Magnier, E.; Blazejewski, J.-C.; Tordeux, M.; Wakselman, C. Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 1301–1304. doi:10.1002/ange.200503776
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  283. Umemoto, T.; Ishihara, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 2156–2164. doi:10.1021/ja00059a009
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  284. Umemoto, N.; Ishihara, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 3579–3582. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)94447-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  285. Manteau, B.; Pazenok, S.; Vors, J. P.; Leroux, F. R. J. Fluorine Chem. 2010, 131, 140–158. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2009.09.009
    Return to citation in text: [1]