A convenient catalyst system for microwave accelerated cross-coupling of a range of aryl boronic acids with aryl chlorides

  1. 1 ,
  2. 2 ,
  3. 1 ,
  4. 1 and
  5. 1
1School of Chemistry, University of St Andrews, EaStCHEM, St Andrews, Fife, UK
2Department of Chemistry, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA 24450, USA
  1. Author email
  2. Corresponding author email

Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2007, 3, No. 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1860-5397-3-18
Received 08 Mar 2007, Accepted 30 May 2007, Published 30 May 2007
Preliminary Communication
cc by logo

Abstract

A convenient microwave accelerated cross-coupling procedure between aryl chlorides with a range of boronic acids has been developed. An explanation for the low reactivity of highly fluorinated boronic acids in Suzuki coupling is provided.

Background

The Suzuki cross-coupling represents an extremely useful method for biaryl synthesis and is widely applied in organic chemistry. [1-6] In the last 10 years, there has been intense research interest in Suzuki reactions of aryl chloride substrates since these substrates are cheaper and more widely available than aryl bromides. A range of catalysts now exist for aryl chloride activation, including diphosphine-Pd catalysts,[7] mono-phosphine Pd catalysts, [8,9] cyclometallated Pd precursors,[10] and potentially hemi-labile bidentate ligands. [11-15] Some years ago, we demonstrated that the palladium complexes formed from the amine-phosphine ligand, dcpmp, 1 gave very active catalysts for this reaction[13]. At the time this system was one of the few catalysts capable of cross-coupling unactivated aryl chlorides below 100°C. Reaction times were typically 12 hours or slightly less.

More recently, advances in chemical microwave technology have stimulated considerable research on microwave accelerated cross-coupling reactions. [16-27] The reduction of reaction times to 20 minutes or less has made the reaction considerably more valuable in diversity orientated synthesis and med-chem optimisation studies. A small number of these catalyst systems have been found to deliver microwave accelerated aryl chloride cross-coupling, and in the course of another project, we discovered that the Pd/dcpmp catalyst system was just such a catalyst. [27] This has led us to investigate cross-coupling of aryl chlorides with a range of aryl boronic acids under microwave heating conditions. In this paper we report these results, including our observations on why heavily fluorinated boronic acids are such poor nucleophiles in this chemistry.

Findings

In our original studies under conventional conditions, it was found that higher and more reproducible yields were obtained using an in situ catalyst with a ligand/Pd ratio of > 1.5. Although the active catalyst was proposed to be a mono-ligated Pd(0) species, this can be rationalised in terms of better catalyst stability with more ligand present. The air stable pre-catalyst, 2 was somewhat less effective. In the (faster) reactions described here, good results were also obtained using the pre-catalyst, 2 or using in-situ catalysts, with the focus on the use of pre-catalyst 2 due to its greater convenience.

[1860-5397-3-18-i1]

Scheme 1: Catalysts used in this study and microwave accelerated cross-coupling of functionalised boronic acids with 2-chlorobenzonitrile.

The cross-coupling of 2-chlorobenzonitrile with both 4-methyl-phenyl boronic acid and 4-formyl boronic acid was investigated, since products 3 and 4 are potential intermediates in the synthesis of the clinically used drugs, Losartan and Valsartan respectively. [28,29] Under conventional heating conditions, attempts to couple 4-formyl benzene boronic acid to 2-chloro-benzonitrile, under conditions that gave high yields using phenyl boronic acid, gave essentially no product (<5% as determined by NMR, GC and TLC analysis). However, reactions carried out in the microwave gave good isolated yields after just 15 minutes at 140°C in acetonitrile. This reason for this difference in reactivity is not clear. However, a number of observations made during our studies suggested that the nature of the boronic acid nucleophile can have a major effect on the productivity of cross-coupling reactions. The majority of studies, including our own, have neglected to fully evaluate this aspect, so we elected to investigate the effect of the boronic acid component using one aryl chloride substrate, 4-chloro-acetophenone. Representative results are compiled in Table 1.

Table 1: Cross-coupling of a range of boronic acids with 4-chloroacetophenone.

Entrya ArB(OH)2 Base Conversion to product (%) Isolated Yield (%)
1 PhB(OH)2 K3PO4 85 70
2 PhB(OH)2 CsF 96 85
3 4-F-C6H4B(OH)2 K3PO4 88 72
4 4-F-C6H4B(OH)2 CsF b 42 23
5 4-F-C6H4B(OH)2 CsF c 49 N.D.
6 4-F-C6H4B(OH)2 CsF >98 98
7 3-F-C6H4B(OH)2 K3PO4 87 73
8 3-F-C6H4B(OH)2 CsF 92 69
9 2-F-C6H4B(OH)2 K3PO4 82 53
10 2-F-C6H4B(OH)2 CsF 81 64
11 2-MeO-C6H4B(OH)2 CsF 92 80
12 2-MeO-C6H4B(OH)2 CsFd >98 ND
13 4-MeO-C6H4B(OH)2 CsF 82 69
14 3-Napthyl CsF 64 61
15 2,3,6-F3C6H2B(OH)2 CsF <5 N.D.
16e 2,3,6-F3C6H2B(OH)2 CsF <5 N.D.

a: Reactions performed using 1% catalyst 2, 0.5 mmol of 4-chloro-acetophenone under the conditions described in Scheme 2, unless otherwise stated. Conversion to product refers to the NMR yield of the reactions. Yield refers to isolated yield of pure material after column chromatography, or in the case of entries 3–10, recystallisation. N. D. = not determined. b: DMF used as solvent. c: 1.0 mmol of aryl chloride, 1.5 mmol of boronic acid; 3 mmol of base. d: Reaction time extended to 15 minutes. e: 3-bromoacetophenone used as coupling partner.

[1860-5397-3-18-i2]

Scheme 2: Microwave accelerated cross-coupling of a range of boronic acids with 4-chloroacetophenone.

A range of boronic acids can be coupled with high conversion and good to excellent isolated yield for the biaryl products (see Supporting Information File 1 for experimental data). There has been some interest in the cross-coupling of fluorinated nucleophiles due to the application of fluoroaryl substituents in medicinal chemistry and in liquid crystals. [30-34] The Buchwald group recently reported the first couplings of such substrates with aryl chlorides in high yield. [12] Using our catalyst system, it was pleasing that good yields were also observed with 2, 3 and 4 substituted fluorophenyl boronic acids but within just 10 minutes of reaction time (Table 1: Entries 6, 8, and 10). Slightly lower yields were encountered with 2-fluorophenyl boronic acid (Entries 9 and 10). An observation that we suspect may be more general is that reactions were less effective if the concentration of boronic acid was too high, probably due to solubility and stirring issues (Compare entries 5 and 6). The preferred procedure used 0.5 mmol of aryl halide and 0.75 mmol of boronic acid in 4–5 ml of solvent. In contrast to the mono-fluorinated phenyl boronic acids, 2,3,6-trifluorophenyl boronic acid failed to give appreciable amounts of product, even with an aryl bromide substrate (Table 1, Entries 15 and 16). Buchwald and co-workers have previously noted the failure of 2,4,6-trifluorophenyl boronic acid to react with aryl chlorides, although the origin of this effect was not identified.

The origin of this low reactivity could be due to slow transmetalation, [35-38] homo-coupling problems,[39] or Pd catalysed protodeboronation,[40] so we have carried out some mechanistic experiments to shed light on this. A competition experiment was set up (Scheme 3): a single vial containing 0.5 mmol of 3-fluoro-chlorobenzene, 0.75 mmol of phenyl boronic acid, 0.75 mmol of 2,3,6 trifluorophenyl boronic acid and 3 equivalents of base was heated under standard conditions and then directly analysed by 19F NMR spectroscopy. Neither of the two possible biaryls that could form from the two boronic acids were detected (92% aryl chroride starting material detected). In a separate experiment, under similar conditions, 3-fluoro-chlorobenzene was cross-coupled to phenyl boronic acid, without 2,3,6-trifluorophenyl boronic acid present, albeit in only 50% isolated yield. The presence of the heavily fluorinated boronic acid therefore inhibits the catalyst in some way, as opposed to merely being a weak nucleophile.

[1860-5397-3-18-i3]

Scheme 3: Competition experiment demonstrating the inhibitory effect of 2,3,6-trifluorophenyl boronic acid on Suzuki coupling.

To gain further understanding, stoichiometric experiments between [Pd(dppf)Cl2] and boronic acids were carried out (Scheme 4). Given that [Pd(dppf)(Ar)2] species rapidly reductively eliminate,[41] successful transmetalation should result in significant amounts of the symmetrical biaryl (alongside a number of other species such as Pd-aryl intermediates, and base-activated aryl boron species). The reaction between 3-fluorophenylboronic acid (2.1 equivalents, 4.2. equivalents of K3PO4; CD3CN, 140°C, 10 min.), and [Pd(dppf)Cl2] gives several species when analysed by 19F NMR spectroscopy. However, the major product is 3,3'-difluorobiphenyl as established by spiking experiments with a commercial sample.The other species have not been identified, but a further spiking experiment shows that fluorobenzene is not present to any great extent. In contrast, reacting 2,3,6-trifluorophenyl boronic acid with [Pd(dppf)Cl2] under the same conditions yields only 1,2,5 trifluorobenzene as the only fluorine containing product. Protodeboronation is therefore the cause of the low reactivity observed here, and is a likely problem in other Suzuki couplings of highly fluorinated substrates. Finally, we stirred 2,3,6-trifluorophenyl boronic acid with K3PO4 in acetonitrile at room temperature for 15 minutes. The same quantitative formation of the reduced arene was observed even in the absence of Pd catalyst. We therefore propose that Suzuki coupling between this and similar boronic acids is likely to be difficult under any conditions: alternative strategies are required.

[1860-5397-3-18-i4]

Scheme 4: Stoichiometric reactions between fluorinated boronic acids and [Pd(dppf)Cl2].

In summary, a readily prepared, air stable Pd pre-catalyst derived from the amine-phosphine ligand, dcpmp has been found to promote Suzuki coupling between activated aryl chlorides and a range of boronic acids under microwave heating conditions. High yields of the desired biaryls can be obtained in 15 minutes or less. Heavily fluorinated boronic acids do not participate in these Suzuki couplings due to protodeboronation. The accessibility, low cost of the catalyst, short reactions times and convenience of these procedures should make them useful in small scale biaryl synthesis.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Microwave Suzuki biaryl supporting info. Experimental procedures and NMR spectra for the products.
Format: PDF Size: 115.9 KB Download

Acknowledgements

The authors thank EPSRC, the Donors of the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund and Washington and Lee University (Glenn Grant) for support of this work. Johnson Matthey are gratefully acknowledged for loan of precious metal salts. The authors also thank Miss Karen Damian for preparing a sample of catalyst 2, and Mrs M. Smith and C. Horsburgh for technical assistance.

References

  1. Tsuji, J. Palladium Reagents and Catalysts: Innovations in Organic Synthesis; Wiley: Weinheim, 1995.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Tsuji, J. Palladium Reagents and Catalysts: New Perspectives for the 21st Century; Wiley: Weinheim, 2004.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. De Meijere, A.; Dieterich, F. Metal Catalysed Cross-Coupling Reactions; Wiley: Weinheim, 2004.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Roberts, S. M.; Xiao, J. L.; Whittall, J.; Pickett, T. E. Catalysts for Fine Chemical Synthesis: Metal Catalysed Carbon-Carbon Bond-Forming Reactions; Wiley: Weinheim, 2004.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Blaser, H.-U.; Indolese, A.; Naud, F.; Nettekoven, U.; Schnyder, A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1583. doi:10.1002/adsc.200404156
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Farina, V. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1553. doi:10.1002/adsc.200404178
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Colacot, T. J.; Shea, H. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3731–3734. doi:10.1021/ol048598t
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Christmann, U.; Vilar, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 366–374. doi:10.1002/anie.200461189
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Kirchhoff, J. H.; Dai, C. Y.; Fu, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1945. doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20020603)41:11<1945::AID-ANIE1945>3.0.CO;2-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Herrman, W. A.; Brossmer, C.; Reisinger, C. P.; Riermeier, T. H.; Ofele, K.; Beller, M. Chem.–Eur. J. 1997, 3, 1357.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Buchwald, S. L.; Wolfe, J. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2413–2416. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990816)38:16<2413::AID-ANIE2413>3.0.CO;2-H
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Barder, T. E.; Walker, S. D.; Martinelli, J. R.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4685–4696.
    the article itself and references therein.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  13. Clarke, M. L.; Cole-Hamilton, D. J.; Woollins, J. D. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2001, 2721–2723. doi:10.1039/b106784b
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  14. Clarke, M. L.; Woolins, J. D. In Catalysts for the fine chemicals industry; Roberts, S. M.; Pickett, J. E.; Xiao; J; Whittall, J., Eds.; Wiley: Chicester, 2004; Vol. 3, pp 81–85.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Bei, X.; Turner, H. W.; Weinberg, H.; Guram, A. S. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 6797. doi:10.1021/jo990805t
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Larhed, M.; Moberg, C.; Hallberg, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 717. doi:10.1021/ar010074v
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Kappe, C. O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6250. doi:10.1002/anie.200400655
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Lidström, P.; Tierney, J. P. Microwave-assisted Organic Synthesis; Blackwell: Oxford, 2005.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Lidstrom, P.; Tierney, J. P.; Wathey, B.; Westman, J. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9225. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(01)00906-1
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Bedford, R. B.; Butts, C. P.; Hurst, T. E.; Lidström, P. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1627. doi:10.1002/adsc.200404144
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Leadbeater, N. E.; Marco, M. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2973. doi:10.1021/ol0263907
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Wang, Y.; Sauer, D. R. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2793. doi:10.1021/ol048972p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Ferrer Flegeau, E.; Popkin, M. E.; Greaney, M. F. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2495. doi:10.1021/ol060591j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Alacid, E.; Nájera, C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 945. doi:10.1002/adsc.200505494
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Alacid, E.; Nájera, C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 2085. doi:10.1002/adsc.200600262
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Gold, H.; Lahred, M.; Nilsson, P. Synlett 2005, 1596.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Clarke, M. L. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 303. doi:10.1002/adsc.200404196
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  28. Zhang, C.; Zheng, G. J.; Fang, L. J.; Li, Y. L. Synlett 2006, 475.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Larson, R. D.; King, A. O.; Chen, C. Y.; Corley, E. G.; Foster, B. S.; Roberts, F. E.; Yang, C.; Lieberman, D. R.; Reamer, R. A.; Tschaen, D. M.; Verhoeven, T. R.; Reider, P. J. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 6391. doi:10.1021/jo00100a048
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Rosenblum, S.; Huynah, B.; Afonso, A.; Davis, H. R., Jr.; Yimibe, N.; Clader, J. W.; Burnett, D. A. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 980. doi:10.1021/jm970701f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Ma, J.-A.; Cahard, D. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 6119. doi:10.1021/cr030143e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Schofield, H. J. Fluorine Chem. 1999, 100, 7. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(99)00147-5
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Hiyama, T., Ed. Organofluorine Compounds: Chemistry and Applications; Springer: New York, 2000.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Guo, M.; Fangfang, J.; Ren, H. J. Fluorine Chem. 2006, 127, 177. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2005.09.003
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Casares, J. A.; Espinet, P.; Salas, G. Chem.–Eur. J. 2002, 8, 4843. doi:10.1002/1521-3765(20021104)8:21<4843::AID-CHEM4843>3.0.CO;2-I
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Denmark, S. E.; Sweis, R. F.; Wehrli, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4865. doi:10.1021/ja037234d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Amatore, C.; Bahsoun, A. A.; Jutand, A.; Meyer, G.; Ntepe, A. N.; Ricard, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4212. doi:10.1021/ja0204978
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Clarke, M. L.; Heydt, M. Organometallics 2005, 24, 6475. doi:10.1021/om050724p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Wong, M. S.; Zhang, X. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4087. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)00637-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Kuivala, H. G.; Reuwer, J. F., Jr.; Mangravite, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 2666. doi:10.1021/ja01067a031
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Brown, J. M.; Guiry, P. J. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1994, 220, 249. doi:10.1016/0020-1693(94)03876-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities