The 2013 Impact Factor is 2.820 according to the Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports.


 
 

Anthracene appended pyridinium amide–urea conjugate in selective fluorometric sensing of L-N-acetylvaline salt

Kumaresh Ghosh, Tanmay Sarkar and Asoke P. Chattopadhyay
Department of Chemistry, University of Kalyani, Kalyani-741235, India, Fax +91-33-25828282
Email of corresponding author Corresponding author email     
Associate Editor: S. C. Zimmerman
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, 1211–1218.
doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.139
 
 
 
 

Abstract

A new anthracene labeled pyridinium amide–urea conjugate 1 has been designed and synthesized. The receptor shows a different fluorometric response with L-N-acetylvaline and L-N-acetylalanine salts in CH3CN in contrast to the other salts of L-N-acetyl α-amino acids and (S)-α-hydroxy acids studied. Upon complexation of the tetrabutylammonium salt of L-N-acetylvaline, the emission of 1 increases accompanied by the formation of a new band at higher wavelength and this characteristic change distinguishes it from other anionic substrates studied. The binding interaction has been studied by 1H NMR, fluorescence and UV titration experiments.

Keywords: N-acetyl-L-valine salt; DFT calculation; emission decay; fluorometric detection; pyridinium amide–urea conjugate

Top

Introduction

The design and synthesis of artificial receptors capable of recognizing α-hydroxy and N-acetyl-α-amino acid carboxylates (i.e., salts of α-amino acids) is an active area of interest in supramolecular chemistry due to the biological significance and practical importance of α-amino and α-hydroxy acids [1-7]. While α-hydroxycarboxylic acids are useful synthons for many organic natural products and drug molecules, α-amino carboxylic acids are important as they are the building blocks of proteins, enzymes etc., which govern numerous biochemical processes. In this context, detection and sensing of these molecules by fluorescence spectroscopy offers a variety of advantages such as different detection modes (fluorescence quenching, enhancement and life time), high sensitivity, low instrumentation cost, time efficiency, and the possibility of performing real time analysis. However, the development of receptors for these molecules is slow due to their insolubility in organic solvents, especially amino acids. For strong complexation of zwitterionic amino acids, synthetic receptors should possess complementary binding sites for both ammonium and carboxylate functionalities. Examples in this domain are known in the literature [8-15]. To overcome the solubility problem, α-amino acids are sometimes converted into their N-acetyl derivatives which makes their recognition easier in organic solvents [16-19], as these are non-competitive solvents and guests exhibit minimal solubility. Hamilton et al. introduced simple pyridine amide-based receptors for the effective recognition of N-acetyl-α-amino acids by multiple hydrogen bonding interactions [20]. During our work on selective recognition of different anionic species including carboxylates [21,22], we reported receptors of various structures with different binding sites. The pyridinium motif, which was first used by Jeong et al. for carboxylate binding [23], was one of the binding sites in our designed receptors [24-26]. The pyridinium motif is unique due to its contribution to the charge–charge interaction and formation of unconventional hydrogen bonds with the anionic guests [27]. In order to explore this binding site for a wide range of substrates, especially for amino acid derivatives, we report here the design and synthesis of a new fluororeceptor 1 where anthracene is attached to the binding site through a covalent CH2 spacer to yield a photo induced electron transfer sensory system [28]. The receptor 1 shows effective binding of the tetrabutylammonium salt of L-N-acetylvaline by exhibiting significant change in emission.

Complexation induced formation of an exciplex or charge transfer complex in CH3CN is the key feature in the present study for the selective detection of a L-N-acetylvaline salt from other anionic guests. To explain the formation of an exciplex or charge transfer complex in 1 upon complexation of L-N-acetylvaline salt, compound 2 was synthesized and studied (see Figure 1).

[1860-5397-6-139-1]
Figure 1: Synthesized compounds 1 and 2.
Top

Results and Discussion

Compounds 1 and 2 were synthesized according to Scheme 1. Initially, 3-nitrobenzoyl chloride was reacted with 3-aminopyridine to give the amide 3. Reduction of the –NO2 group in 3 with SnCl2 in EtOAc afforded the amine 4, which was further reacted with 4-nitrophenyl isocyanate (obtained from 4-nitroaniline by reaction with triphosgene in dry THF) in dry THF to give urea derivative 5. Subsequent reaction of 5 with 9-chloromethylanthracene under refluxing conditions in dry CH3CN gave the chloride salt 6. Anion exchange of the salt 6 with NH4PF6 afforded the desired receptor 1 as a white solid. Compound 2 was obtained from the intermediate amine 4 after performing a series of reactions such as amide formation, alkylation on pyridine ring nitrogen followed by anion exchange with NH4PF6 (Scheme 1b). Compounds 1 and 2 were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, FTIR and mass spectrometry.

[1860-5397-6-139-i1]
Scheme 1: Syntheses of 1 and 2.

The solution phase binding interaction of the tetrabutylammonium salts of L-N-acetylalanine, L-N-acetylvaline, L-N-acetylproline and L-N-acetylphenylglycine, (S)-mandelic and pyruvic acids was investigated by 1H NMR, UV–vis and fluorescence techniques. Initially, we recorded the 1H NMR of 1 in the presence and the absence of the guests in CDCl3 containing 0.4% d6-DMSO (due to insolubility of 1 in pure CDCl3). In the presence of equivalent amounts of all the guests, urea (ΔδNHb = 0.93–1.90, ΔδNHc = 0.87–1.96) and amide protons (ΔδNHa = 0.46–0.79) underwent downfield shifts suggesting their involvement in the binding process. In addition, the pyridinium ortho proton (Ho) in 1 was also downfield shifted (Δδ = 0.83–1.06) which indicated its involvement in the formation of strong hydrogen bonding with the carboxylate moiety of the guests. In contrast, the pyridinium para proton (Hp) showed a small downfield shift (Δδ = 0.02–0.48). This small change in chemical shift of the para proton is due to either a change in bond length of the intramolecular hydrogen bond between the amide carbonyl oxygen and para hydrogen of pyridinium motif, or involvement in the formation of a hydrogen bond with the guest in solution. On addition of an equivalent amount of tetrabutylammonium salts of acetate and pyruvate to the solution of 1, precipitation occurred. A similar finding was observed in the presence of an equivalent amount of the alanine salt. Figure 2 shows the change in 1H NMR spectrum of 1 in presence of an equivalent amount of tetrabutylammonium salts of L-N-acetylvaline, L-N-acetylproline and (S)-mandelic acid.

[1860-5397-6-139-2]
Figure 2: Change in 1H NMR of (A) 1 (400 MHz, CDCl3 containing 0.4% d6-DMSO; c = 2.80 × 10−3 M) and in the presence of equivalent amount of (B) L-N-acetylvaline, (C) L-N-acetylproline salts.

Once it was realized that both urea and pyridinium sites of 1 are involved in hydrogen bonding with the guests studied, we recorded the emission spectra of 1 in CH3CN. Receptor 1 showed an intense emission at 415 nm when excited at 370 nm in CH3CN. Upon gradual addition of the guests to a solution of 1 (c = 4.31 × 10−5 M) in CH3CN, the emission at 415 nm was changed differently. For all guests, except the salts of L-N-acetylvaline and L-N-acetylalanine, emission of 1 at 415 nm decreased gradually (Supporting Information File 1). However, in the case of the L-N-acetylvaline salt, a broad emission at 492 nm with moderate intensity was observed. Figure 3 displays the change in emission of 1 at 492 nm in the presence of one equivalent of each guest in CH3CN. The increase in emission of 1 at 492 nm in the presence of tetrabutylammonium salts of L-N-acetylvaline and L-N-acetylalanine is moderate and distinguishable from the other guests. It is worth noting that the appearance of the new emission at 492 nm is more significant in the presence of L-N-acetylvaline salt than with L-N-acetylalanine. This is attributed to the formation of a charge transfer complex between the excited state of anthracene and the electron deficient nitrophenyl urea during the interaction process. We believe that this characteristic feature with L-N-acetylvaline is due to its structural feature that controls the distance between donor and acceptor.

[1860-5397-6-139-3]
Figure 3: Change in fluorescence ratio of 1 upon addition of one equivalent of anions (c = 4.31 × 10−5 M) at 492 nm.

Figure 4a and Figure 4b show the change in emission of 1 (c = 4.31 × 10−5 M) upon increasing the quantity of tetrabutylammonium salts of L-N-acetylvaline and L-N-acetylalanine, respectively. The expected charge transfer in 1 upon complexation of valine salt was further established by performing similar fluorescence titration experiment with the receptor 2, where the electron deficient urea motif is absent. In this case, no broad band at 492 nm was observed when the titration was carried out by gradual addition of the valine salt (Supporting Information File 1). This was also the case for the alanine salt. The other salts merely perturbed the emission of 2 and thus indicate the positive role of the urea motif in 1 for effective complexation of anionic substrates. This is in accordance with Hamilton’s observation [20].

[1860-5397-6-139-4]
Figure 4: Change in emission of 1 (c = 4.31 × 10−5 M) upon gradual addition of tetrabutylammonium salts of (a) L-N-acetylvaline and (b) L-N-acetylalanine.

The different modes of emission (enhancing and quenching) of 1 in the presence of the different guests studied is believed to be due to the structural difference and hydrogen bonding abilities of the guests for which the PET process occurring between the amide-urea binding site and the excited state of anthracene is regulated in different ways. We presume that receptor 1 may follow any equilibrium-binding mode A, B or C with valine, alanine and phenylglycine salts in solution as shown in Figure 5. This is also true for the mandelate, pyruvate and proline salts. Relevance of the suggested modes in Figure 5 was followed from the change in chemical shift of the key protons of 1 in the 1H NMR upon complexation (see Figure 2) as well as from Hamilton’s observation on related systems [3]. In the interaction process, the stoichiometry of the complexes was 1:1 as confirmed by Job plots (Supporting Information File 1). In addition, the break in the titration curves at [G]/[H] = 1 in Figure 6 also supports this stoichiometry. A closer look at the curves for L-N-acetylvaline and L-N-acetylalanine salts in Figure 6 shows that there are breaks at [G]/[H] = 1 within the range of 3 equivalents of the added guest. Further addition causes a steady increase in emission and reaches saturation only when 20 to 30 equivalent amounts of the guest are added (Supporting Information File 1). This result suggests that in the presence of a large excess of the L-N-acetylvaline and L-N-acetylalanine salts that complexes with higher order stoichiometries are being formed in solution. The almost linear nature of the titration curves for all other guests except L-N-acetylvaline and L-N-acetylalanine salts at 492 nm (Figure 6) corroborated the weak interaction.

[1860-5397-6-139-5]
Figure 5: Suggested modes of binding of the amino acid salts into the open cleft of 1.
[1860-5397-6-139-6]
Figure 6: Fluorescence titration curves for 1 (c = 4.31 × 10−5 M) at 492 nm.

The time resolved emissions for 1 and 2 upon excitation at 370 nm were then studied to have an insight into the interaction process. The emission decay profile of 1 monitored at 420 nm could be fitted bi-exponential with two constants τ1 = 0.46 ps (100%), τ2 = 2.59 ns (0%). The faster decay component (0.46 ps) is either due to a very short-lived species or an artifact, or for tunneling of extra energy to the bulk by a non-radiative pathway [29,30]. The emitting species with a life time of 2.59 ns is real. However, in the presence of 1 equiv of L-N-acetylvaline salt, the decay profile followed a tri-exponential fitting that indicated three emitting species with life times τ1 = 1 ns (0.02%), τ2 = 4.23 ns (0.02%) and τ3 = 0.62 ps (99.96%) (Figure 7). Among these, the fast decay component 0.62 ps could be attributed to the formation of a hydrogen-bonded short-lived species where presumably intramolecular charge transfer between anthracene and nitrophenyl urea as represented in Figure 4a, takes place. This component coexists with the other components contributing large preexponential factor to the total fluorescence. This finding was not observed with L-N-acetylalanine or L-N-acetylproline salts (Table 1). Neither was this observed when the emission decay of 2 was monitored at 418 nm in the presence of L-N-acetylvaline salt upon excitation at 370 nm. This observation is thus noteworthy since it distinguishes the L-N-acetylvaline salt in the present study form the others with receptor 1.

[1860-5397-6-139-7]
Figure 7: Fluorescence decays (at λmax = 420 nm) of receptor 1 upon the addition of 1 equiv of L-N-acetylvaline salt ([H] = 4.71 × 10−5 M, [G] = 9.42 × 10−4 M) in CH3CN.
Table 1: Fluorescence decay times (τ), and preexponential factors for 1 and 2 in CH3CN.
Receptor in presence and absence of guestFluorescence decay time τ (preexponential factor)
1τ1 = 0.46 ps ( 100%), τ2 = 2.59 ns ( 0%) ; (χ2 = 1.43)
1 + 1 equiv L-N-acetylvaline saltτ1 = 1 ns (0.02%), τ2 = 4.23 ns (0.02%), τ3 = 0.62 ps (99.96%); (χ2 = 1.08)
1 + 1 equiv L-N-acetylalanine saltτ1 = 5.0 ps (58.83%), τ2 = 2.75 ns (41.17%); (χ2 = 1.03)
1 + 1 equiv L-N-acetylproline saltτ1 = 2.5 ps (85.56%), τ2 = 2.76 ns (14.44%); (χ2 = 1.15)
2τ1 = 0.58 ps (99.98%), τ2 = 3.92 ns (0.02%); (χ2 = 1.54)
2 + 1 equiv L-N-acetylvaline saltτ1 = 0.63 ps (99.95%), τ2 = 3.87 ns (0.05%); (χ2 = 1.72)
2 + 1 equiv L-N-acetylalanine saltτ1 = 2.52 ps (65.38%), τ2 = 3.84 ns (34.62%); (χ2 = 1.69)
2 + 1 equiv L-N-acetylproline saltτ1 = 0.49 ps (100%), τ2 = 4.18 ns (0%); (χ2 = 1.36)

Concurrently, the ground state binding properties of 1 in CH3CN were evaluated by UV–vis studies. The absorption spectrum of 1 (c = 4.31 × 10−5 M) in the absence of anions showed a structured band with maximum intensity at 341 nm. Upon titration with the salt of L-N-acetylvaline the ground state of 1 was affected significantly and the absorption was weakly red shifted because of recognition of the anion and a distinctive isosbestic point was observed at 340 nm (Figure 8). Similar observations were noted with the other guests (Supporting Information File 1). The stoichiometry of the interaction process in the ground state was also 1:1 as established from the break in the titration curves as well as Job plots [31] (Supporting Information File 1). In the titration curves, downward running of the titration curves in few cases indicates that as a greater excess of the guest anion is added, the 1:1 host–guest complex is assumed to be disrupted and anions begin to bind individually to the pyridinium amide and urea binding sites, rather than in a cooperative manner. Thus, in principle, equilibrium complexes of multiple stoichiometries can be generated in solution. This behavior depends on the anions [32] and also on the concentrations of the host and guest used at which the titration experiments are monitored.

[1860-5397-6-139-8]
Figure 8: Change in absorbance of 1 (c = 4.31 × 10−5 M) upon gradual addition of tetrabutylammonium salts of L-N-acetylvaline.

Analysis of the emission data provided the association constants (Ka), reported in Table 2 [33]. For determining binding constant values for L-N-acetylvaline and L-N-acetylalanine salts, we considered the emission data up to the addition of 13 equivalents of the guests added, since in the presence of large excess of such guests complex stoichiometries were noted. From Table 2 it can be seen that receptor 1 exhibits higher binding constant values for L-N-acetylvaline in the series. At this moment, we believe that it is due to structural aspects as well as to the hydrogen bonding capacity of the valine salt. Furthermore, to establish the hydrogen bonding influence of the acylamino and hydroxy groups of the amino and hydroxy acids respectively, we determined the binding constant for the acetate anion. This was found to be slightly less when compared to all the other guests. Pyruvate with carbonyl at the α-position did not produce any marked change in emission of 1. We also determined the binding constants for 2 with the same anions in CH3CN by fluorescence (Table 2) and the values were found to be less compared to the values for 1. This is in accordance with Hamilton’s observation [3] and indicates the role of the urea motif in the binding event.

Table 2: Association constants (Ka) in CH3CN from fluorescence measurements.
GuestaReceptor 1
Ka [M−1]e
Receptor 2
Ka [M−1]e
L-N-acetylvaline1.87 x 104; R = 0.998c1.30 x 103; R = 0.988c
L-N-acetylalanine2.60 x 103; R = 0.995d6.50 x 102; R = 0.993c
L-N-acetylproline1.38 x 103; R = 0.993cb
L-N-acetylphenylglycine1.31 x 103; R = 0.989cb
acetate2.20 x 103; R = 0.997c1.70 x 103; R = 0.998c
(S)-mandelate1.60 x 103; R = 0.995cb
pyruvatebb

In order to realize the conformational behavior and the reactivity of 1 towards hydrogen bonding with the anionic guests as noted in Table 2, we carried out detailed DFT calculations. The Gaussian-03 package [34] and GAMESS-US suite [35] (version April 11, 2008) was used for the calculations and the MO figures were obtained using the MaSK software [36]. DFT calculations were performed in the gas phase on the two different conformations of 1 using the 6-311G** basis set [37] and the popular b3LYP functional [38,39]. Similar calculations were also carried out on all the guests given in Table 2. For all the compounds, parameters such as global electrophilicity (ω), global electronegativity (χ), global hardness (η), dipole moment (µ) and the energies of HOMO and LUMO are also reported (Table S1; Supporting Information File 1) from their DFT optimized structures [34-36]. The orientation of the binding sites in both 1A and 1B are displayed in Figure S15 (Supporting Information File 1). Of the two possible conformations of receptor 1 (Figure S15), 1B is found to be more stable than 1A by 2.82 kcal/mol. Therefore, we may reasonably expect that in solution both conformers may remain in equilibrium. However, conformation 1A may form a more stable hydrogen-bonded complex with guests, owing to formation of a greater number of hydrogen bonds with the guests. For example, Figure 9 demonstrates the hydrogen-bonded complex of 1A with N-acetyl-L-valine carboxylate, where both the urea and pyridinium motifs are cooperatively involved in bonding.

[1860-5397-6-139-9]
Figure 9: DFT optimized geometry of the complex of 1 with L-N-acetylvaline carboxylate salt [a = 1.93 Å, b = 1.99 Å, c = 1.64 Å, d = 1.97 Å, e = 2.60 Å and f = 2.69 Å].

However, interaction between the electrophile and the nucleophile can be quantified in terms of the electrophilicity index (ω) of individual species involved in the process. Although ω of structure 1A is found to be only slightly different from that of 1B (Supporting Information File 1), it is obvious that structure 1 has an affinity for anionic guests. As can be seen from Table S1 (Supporting Information File 1), guests such as the salts of valine, phenylglycine and mandelic acid exhibit the lowest values of ω among all anionic guests considered. This indicates that these guests have higher nucleophilic character compared to the other guests studied. Therefore, receptor 1, in principle, will show strong binding for these salts. Experimental results support this observation (see Table 2). Furthermore, to rationalize the preferential mode of interaction of the carboxylate guests with the two different binding domains (urea and pyridinium sites) of receptor 1, we further calculated Fukui functions [40] for nucleophilic attack (fk+) at these two sites. The larger the value, the greater is the reactivity of the site towards a nucleophile. Between the two sites of 1, pyridinium amide exhibits a value of 0.5384, which is significantly greater than the value obtained for urea site (0.0021) and thus binding of the carboxylate part of all the guests will take place preferentially at the pyridinium site instead of urea (see structures B/C in Figure 5).

In conclusion, we have designed and synthesized a new fluororeceptor 1, which is able to bind α-acylamino as well as hydroxy acids with moderate binding constant values. The receptor clearly distinguishes L-N-acetylvaline and L-N-acetylalanine salts from the other anionic substrates studied by exhibiting different modes of emission. The appearance of charge transfer band and three decay components in time resolved spectroscopy upon complexation of L-N-acetylvaline salt are the distinct features in the present study to distinguish it from the other anions examined. Further progress in this direction is underway in our laboratory.

Top

Supporting Information

Synthesis and characterization data for 1 and 2, general procedure for fluorescence and UV titrations, change in absorption and fluorescence spectra, Job plots of receptor 1 with few selected guests, change in emission of 2 in the presence of few selected anions, UV titration curves for 1, selected binding constant curve for 1, change in emission of 1 upon dilution with solvent, titration curves for 1 with valine and alanine salts, DFT optimized geometry of 1 and MO energies, global hardness, global electronegativity, global electropositivity, dipole moment etc. are available.

Supporting Information File 1: Detailed experimental data for 1 and 2.
Format: PDF   Size: 4.3 MB   Download

Top

Acknowledgements

We thank CSIR, Government of India for financial support. TS thanks CSIR, New Delhi, India for a fellowship. We also thank DST, Government of India for providing facilities in the department under FIST program.

Top

References

  1. Lin, J.; Hu, Q.-S.; Xu, M.-H.; Pu, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2088. doi:10.1021/ja011971x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Li, Z.-B.; Lin, J.; Pu, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1690. doi:10.1002/anie.200462471
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Li, Z.; Lin, J.; Qin, Y.; Pu, L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3441. doi:10.1021/ol0510163
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  4. Hernandez-Rodriguez, M.; Juaristi, E. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 7673. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2007.05.021
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Yang, D.; Li, X.; Fan, Y.-F.; Zhang, D.-W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7996. doi:10.1021/ja051072z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Still, W. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 155.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Sessler, J. L.; Andrievsky, A. Chem.–Eur. J. 1998, 4, 159. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3765(199801)4:1<159::AID-CHEM159>3.0.CO;2-N
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Rebek, J., Jr.; Askew, B.; Nemeth, D.; Parris, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2432. doi:10.1021/ja00242a030
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Galan, A.; Andreu, D.; Echavarren, A. M.; Prados, P.; de Mendoza, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1511. doi:10.1021/ja00030a074
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Metzger, A.; Gloe, K.; Stephan, H.; Schmidtchen, F. P. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2051. doi:10.1021/jo951436d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Hong, J.-I.; Namgoong, S. K.; Barnardi, A.; Still, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5111. doi:10.1021/ja00013a084
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Erickson, S. D.; Simon, J. A.; Still, W. C. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 1305. doi:10.1021/jo00058a005
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Yoon, S. S.; Still, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 823. doi:10.1021/ja00055a083
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. DebRoy, P.; Banerjee, M.; Prasad, M.; Moulik, S. P.; Roy, S. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 403. doi:10.1021/ol0476772
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Clark, J. L.; Stezowski, J. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9880. doi:10.1021/ja003717v
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Dobashi, A.; Hara, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 1509. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)81694-9
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Schmuck, C.; Geiger, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10486. doi:10.1021/ja052699k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Schmuck, C. Chem. Commun. 1999, 843. doi:10.1039/a901126i
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Davis, A. P.; Lawless, I. J. Chem. Commun. 1999, 9. doi:10.1039/a808245f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Vicent, C.; Fan, E.; Hamilton, A. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4269. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)74235-3
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  21. Ghosh, K.; Saha, I.; Patra, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 2392. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.02.215
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Ghosh, K.; Masanta, G.; Chattopadhyay, A. P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 4515. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200900471
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Jeong, K.-S.; Cho, Y. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3279. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(97)00602-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Ghosh, K.; Sarkar, A. R.; Patra, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 6557. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.09.043
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Ghosh, K.; Sarkar, A. R.; Masanta, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 8725. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.10.019
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Ghosh, K.; Sarkar, A. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 85. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.10.135
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Wallance, K. J.; Belcher, W. J.; Turner, D. R.; Syed, K. F.; Steed, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9699. doi:10.1021/ja034921w
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Bissel, R. A.; de Silva, A. P.; Gunaratne, H. Q. N.; Lynch, P. L. M.; Maguire, G. E. M.; Sandanayake, K. R. A. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1992, 21, 187. doi:10.1039/cs9922100187
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Inoue, H.; Hida, M.; Nakashima, N.; Yoshihara, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 3184. doi:10.1021/j100213a024
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Shiraishi, Y.; Kohno, Y.; Hirai, T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 19139. doi:10.1021/jp052645x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Job, P. Ann. Chim. Appl. 1928, 9, 113.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Turner, D. R.; Paterson, M. J.; Steed, J. W. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1598. doi:10.1021/jo052339f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Chou, P. T.; Wu, G. R.; Wei, C. Y.; Cheng, C. C.; Chang, C. P.; Hung, F. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 7818. doi:10.1021/jp001001g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Gaussian 03, Revision C.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford CT, 2004.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  35. GAMESS-US suite, April 11, 2008; NGS: UK, http://www.ngs.ac.uk/applications/chemistry/gamess.
    For a description see: "General Atomic and Molecular Electronic Structure System" M. W. Schmidt, K. K. Baldridge, J. A. Boatz, S. T. Elbert, M. S. Gordon, J. H. Jensen, S. Koseki, N. Matsunaga, K. A. Nguyen, S. Su, T. L. Windus, M. Dupuis, J. A. Montgomery J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 1347–1363.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  36. Podolyan, Y.; Leszczynski, J. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2009, 109, 8. doi:10.1002/qua.21662
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  37. Krishnan, R.; Binkley, J. S.; Seeger, R.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 650. doi:10.1063/1.438955
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. doi:10.1063/1.464913
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Stephens, P. J.; Devlin, F. J.; Chabalowski, C. F.; Frisch, M. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 11623. doi:10.1021/j100096a001
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Chattaraj, P. K.; Sarkar, U.; Roy, D. R. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 2065. doi:10.1021/cr040109f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Top
Figure 1: Synthesized compounds 1 and 2. Move  Close
Figure 2: Change in 1H NMR of (A) 1 (400 MHz, CDCl3 containing 0.4% d6-DMSO; c = 2.80 × 10−3 M) and in the presence of equivalent amount of (B) L-N-acetylvaline, (C) L-N-acetylproline salts. Move  Close
Figure 3: Change in fluorescence ratio of 1 upon addition of one equivalent of anions (c = 4.31 × 10−5 M) at 492 nm. Move  Close
Figure 4: Change in emission of 1 (c = 4.31 × 10−5 M) upon gradual addition of tetrabutylammonium salts of (a) L-N-acetylvaline and (b) L-N-acetylalanine. Move  Close
Figure 5: Suggested modes of binding of the amino acid salts into the open cleft of 1. Move  Close
Figure 6: Fluorescence titration curves for 1 (c = 4.31 × 10−5 M) at 492 nm. Move  Close
Figure 7: Fluorescence decays (at λmax = 420 nm) of receptor 1 upon the addition of 1 equiv of L-N-acetylvaline salt ([H] = 4.71 × 10−5 M, [G] = 9.42 × 10−4 M) in CH3CN. Move  Close
Figure 8: Change in absorbance of 1 (c = 4.31 × 10−5 M) upon gradual addition of tetrabutylammonium salts of L-N-acetylvaline. Move  Close
Figure 9: DFT optimized geometry of the complex of 1 with L-N-acetylvaline carboxylate salt [a = 1.93 Å, b = 1.99 Å, c = 1.64 Å, d = 1.97 Å, e = 2.60 Å and f = 2.69 Å]. Move  Close
Scheme 1: Syntheses of 1 and 2. Move  Close
Table 1: Fluorescence decay times (τ), and preexponential factors for 1 and 2 in CH3CN. Move  Close
Receptor in presence and absence of guestFluorescence decay time τ (preexponential factor)
1τ1 = 0.46 ps ( 100%), τ2 = 2.59 ns ( 0%) ; (χ2 = 1.43)
1 + 1 equiv L-N-acetylvaline saltτ1 = 1 ns (0.02%), τ2 = 4.23 ns (0.02%), τ3 = 0.62 ps (99.96%); (χ2 = 1.08)
1 + 1 equiv L-N-acetylalanine saltτ1 = 5.0 ps (58.83%), τ2 = 2.75 ns (41.17%); (χ2 = 1.03)
1 + 1 equiv L-N-acetylproline saltτ1 = 2.5 ps (85.56%), τ2 = 2.76 ns (14.44%); (χ2 = 1.15)
2τ1 = 0.58 ps (99.98%), τ2 = 3.92 ns (0.02%); (χ2 = 1.54)
2 + 1 equiv L-N-acetylvaline saltτ1 = 0.63 ps (99.95%), τ2 = 3.87 ns (0.05%); (χ2 = 1.72)
2 + 1 equiv L-N-acetylalanine saltτ1 = 2.52 ps (65.38%), τ2 = 3.84 ns (34.62%); (χ2 = 1.69)
2 + 1 equiv L-N-acetylproline saltτ1 = 0.49 ps (100%), τ2 = 4.18 ns (0%); (χ2 = 1.36)
Table 2: Association constants (Ka) in CH3CN from fluorescence measurements. Move  Close
GuestaReceptor 1
Ka [M−1]e
Receptor 2
Ka [M−1]e
L-N-acetylvaline1.87 x 104; R = 0.998c1.30 x 103; R = 0.988c
L-N-acetylalanine2.60 x 103; R = 0.995d6.50 x 102; R = 0.993c
L-N-acetylproline1.38 x 103; R = 0.993cb
L-N-acetylphenylglycine1.31 x 103; R = 0.989cb
acetate2.20 x 103; R = 0.997c1.70 x 103; R = 0.998c
(S)-mandelate1.60 x 103; R = 0.995cb
pyruvatebb
27.Wallance, K. J.; Belcher, W. J.; Turner, D. R.; Syed, K. F.; Steed, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9699. doi:10.1021/ja034921w
Go to reference 27
28.Bissel, R. A.; de Silva, A. P.; Gunaratne, H. Q. N.; Lynch, P. L. M.; Maguire, G. E. M.; Sandanayake, K. R. A. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1992, 21, 187. doi:10.1039/cs9922100187
Go to reference 28
23.Jeong, K.-S.; Cho, Y. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3279. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(97)00602-3
Go to reference 23
24.Ghosh, K.; Sarkar, A. R.; Patra, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 6557. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.09.043
25.Ghosh, K.; Sarkar, A. R.; Masanta, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 8725. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.10.019
26.Ghosh, K.; Sarkar, A. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 85. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.10.135
Go to references 24-26
20.Vicent, C.; Fan, E.; Hamilton, A. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4269. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)74235-3
Go to reference 20
21.Ghosh, K.; Saha, I.; Patra, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 2392. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.02.215
22.Ghosh, K.; Masanta, G.; Chattopadhyay, A. P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 4515. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200900471
Go to references 21,22
8.Rebek, J., Jr.; Askew, B.; Nemeth, D.; Parris, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2432. doi:10.1021/ja00242a030
9.Galan, A.; Andreu, D.; Echavarren, A. M.; Prados, P.; de Mendoza, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1511. doi:10.1021/ja00030a074
10.Metzger, A.; Gloe, K.; Stephan, H.; Schmidtchen, F. P. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2051. doi:10.1021/jo951436d
11.Hong, J.-I.; Namgoong, S. K.; Barnardi, A.; Still, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5111. doi:10.1021/ja00013a084
12.Erickson, S. D.; Simon, J. A.; Still, W. C. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 1305. doi:10.1021/jo00058a005
13.Yoon, S. S.; Still, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 823. doi:10.1021/ja00055a083
14.DebRoy, P.; Banerjee, M.; Prasad, M.; Moulik, S. P.; Roy, S. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 403. doi:10.1021/ol0476772
15.Clark, J. L.; Stezowski, J. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9880. doi:10.1021/ja003717v
Go to references 8-15
16.Dobashi, A.; Hara, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 1509. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)81694-9
17.Schmuck, C.; Geiger, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10486. doi:10.1021/ja052699k
18.Schmuck, C. Chem. Commun. 1999, 843. doi:10.1039/a901126i
19.Davis, A. P.; Lawless, I. J. Chem. Commun. 1999, 9. doi:10.1039/a808245f
Go to references 16-19
1.Lin, J.; Hu, Q.-S.; Xu, M.-H.; Pu, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2088. doi:10.1021/ja011971x
2.Li, Z.-B.; Lin, J.; Pu, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1690. doi:10.1002/anie.200462471
3.Li, Z.; Lin, J.; Qin, Y.; Pu, L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3441. doi:10.1021/ol0510163
4.Hernandez-Rodriguez, M.; Juaristi, E. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 7673. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2007.05.021
5.Yang, D.; Li, X.; Fan, Y.-F.; Zhang, D.-W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7996. doi:10.1021/ja051072z
6.Still, W. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 155.
7.Sessler, J. L.; Andrievsky, A. Chem.–Eur. J. 1998, 4, 159. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3765(199801)4:1<159::AID-CHEM159>3.0.CO;2-N
Go to references 1-7
36.Podolyan, Y.; Leszczynski, J. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2009, 109, 8. doi:10.1002/qua.21662
Go to reference 36
35.GAMESS-US suite, April 11, 2008; NGS: UK, http://www.ngs.ac.uk/applications/chemistry/gamess.
For a description see: "General Atomic and Molecular Electronic Structure System" M. W. Schmidt, K. K. Baldridge, J. A. Boatz, S. T. Elbert, M. S. Gordon, J. H. Jensen, S. Koseki, N. Matsunaga, K. A. Nguyen, S. Su, T. L. Windus, M. Dupuis, J. A. Montgomery J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 1347–1363.
Go to reference 35
34.Gaussian 03, Revision C.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford CT, 2004.
Go to reference 34
31.Job, P. Ann. Chim. Appl. 1928, 9, 113.
Go to reference 31
32.Turner, D. R.; Paterson, M. J.; Steed, J. W. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1598. doi:10.1021/jo052339f
Go to reference 32
33.Chou, P. T.; Wu, G. R.; Wei, C. Y.; Cheng, C. C.; Chang, C. P.; Hung, F. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 7818. doi:10.1021/jp001001g
Go to reference 33
3.Li, Z.; Lin, J.; Qin, Y.; Pu, L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3441. doi:10.1021/ol0510163
Go to reference 3
34.Gaussian 03, Revision C.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford CT, 2004.
35.GAMESS-US suite, April 11, 2008; NGS: UK, http://www.ngs.ac.uk/applications/chemistry/gamess.
For a description see: "General Atomic and Molecular Electronic Structure System" M. W. Schmidt, K. K. Baldridge, J. A. Boatz, S. T. Elbert, M. S. Gordon, J. H. Jensen, S. Koseki, N. Matsunaga, K. A. Nguyen, S. Su, T. L. Windus, M. Dupuis, J. A. Montgomery J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 1347–1363.
36.Podolyan, Y.; Leszczynski, J. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2009, 109, 8. doi:10.1002/qua.21662
Go to references 34-36
40.Chattaraj, P. K.; Sarkar, U.; Roy, D. R. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 2065. doi:10.1021/cr040109f
Go to reference 40
20.Vicent, C.; Fan, E.; Hamilton, A. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4269. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)74235-3
Go to reference 20
37.Krishnan, R.; Binkley, J. S.; Seeger, R.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 650. doi:10.1063/1.438955
Go to reference 37
3.Li, Z.; Lin, J.; Qin, Y.; Pu, L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3441. doi:10.1021/ol0510163
Go to reference 3
38.Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. doi:10.1063/1.464913
39.Stephens, P. J.; Devlin, F. J.; Chabalowski, C. F.; Frisch, M. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 11623. doi:10.1021/j100096a001
Go to references 38,39
29.Inoue, H.; Hida, M.; Nakashima, N.; Yoshihara, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 3184. doi:10.1021/j100213a024
30.Shiraishi, Y.; Kohno, Y.; Hirai, T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 19139. doi:10.1021/jp052645x
Go to references 29,30
© 2010 Ghosh et al; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)