Enabling technologies and green processes in cyclodextrin chemistry

  1. Giancarlo Cravotto,
  2. Marina Caporaso,
  3. Laszlo Jicsinszky and
  4. Katia Martina

Dipartimento di Scienza e Tecnologia del Farmaco and NIS - Centre for Nanostructured Interfaces and Surfaces, University of Turin, Via P. Giuria 9, 10125 Turin, Italy

  1. Corresponding author email

This article is part of the Thematic Series "Superstructures with cyclodextrins: Chemistry and applications III".

Guest Editor: E. Monflier
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 278–294. doi:10.3762/bjoc.12.30
Received 31 Oct 2015, Accepted 29 Jan 2016, Published 15 Feb 2016


The design of efficient synthetic green strategies for the selective modification of cyclodextrins (CDs) is still a challenging task. Outstanding results have been achieved in recent years by means of so-called enabling technologies, such as microwaves, ultrasound and ball mills, that have become irreplaceable tools in the synthesis of CD derivatives. Several examples of sonochemical selective modification of native α-, β- and γ-CDs have been reported including heterogeneous phase Pd- and Cu-catalysed hydrogenations and couplings. Microwave irradiation has emerged as the technique of choice for the production of highly substituted CD derivatives, CD grafted materials and polymers. Mechanochemical methods have successfully furnished greener, solvent-free syntheses and efficient complexation, while flow microreactors may well improve the repeatability and optimization of critical synthetic protocols.

Keywords: ball milling; cyclodextrin; microwaves; synthesis; ultrasound


The last decade has witnessed the development of highly efficient alternative synthetic methods which make use of new enabling technologies. The need for a more rational approach to the synthesis of cyclodextrin (CD) derivatives has led to several energy sources been tested for their ability to activate C–C and C–X bond formation. In recent years non-conventional energy sources, such as microwaves (MW), ultrasound (US), ball mills (BM) and microreactors have made access to CD derivatives much simpler, as have heterogeneous catalysts and greener solvents. Besides batch reactors, in the last decade these techniques have been adapted to flow systems, which provide greater efficiency, flexibility and lower energy consumption, or in high-throughput applications. Our experience in process intensification and innovative reactors took advantage from flow-multihorn US systems (Figure 1a) and cavitational turbines (Figure 1b) to optimize mass transfer via intense cavitation [1,2]. Similarly, we have accumulated experiences with mechanochemical conditions that open the way to solventless reactions even on a pilot scale (Figure 1c) [3]. The latest generation of dedicated MW reactors, which enable operators to quickly screen reaction conditions by means of parallel tests across a wide range of operative conditions, has provided outstanding MW-assisted synthesis results (Figure 1d) [4]. While most researchers will most likely be acquainted with the potential of dielectric heating, the specific conditions needed to let react CDs efficiently and selectively are often overlooked.


Figure 1: (a) Multihorn-flow US reactor, (b) Cavitational turbine, (c) Pilot-scale BM, (d) High-pressure MW reactor.

The current trends on CDs’ literature and their application in green protocols are clearly depicted in Figure 2. The present literature survey with identical keyword combinations has been done in two major databases [5,6]. The results were partially overlapped only in the full text searches and approximately 4000 records have been found. Further reduction of records, less than 2500, by searching in Title/Abstract/Keyword fields only resulted in more relevant publications. Only 10% roughly of the recently published papers on CDs are dealing with sustainable technologies and only few works are comparing data with conventional synthetic protocols.


Figure 2: Trends in CD papers and CD use in green chemical processes.

Mechanochemical syntheses are typically carried out in BM and also in low-frequency US reactors [7]. This technique has recently developed into a genuine eco-friendly alternative when manufacturing inorganic, organic and metal-organic compounds as well as supramolecular composites, which may differ to those prepared via conventional routes [8]. Higher versatility and selectivity offer a wide range of applications and may facilitate the purification steps [9]. Noteworthy examples are the mechanochemical derivatization of saccharides [10,11], the functionalization of CDs and their complexation with organic molecules [12]. Solid state organic reactions using CD cavities as nanoreactors have also been reported [13].

Among non-conventional techniques, the largest number of papers is dealing with US-assisted CD solubilization or re-dissolution and in a minor extends CD derivatization. Analogously, ball milling is mostly used in the preparation of CD complexes rather than synthetic preparations. MW-assisted CD chemistry covers 1/4–1/5 of the whole literature as seen in Figure 3, mainly focused on synthetic applications.


Figure 3: Distribution of energy efficient methods in CD publications.

As seen in Figure 4, the cake of document types dealing with CD chemistry under non-conventional techniques shows a similar distribution as observed in general CD publications, namely 70% article, 20% patents and 10% books (including non-journal conference proceedings and dissertations).


Figure 4: Document type dealing with CD chemistry under non-conventional techniques (conference proceedings and dissertations are handled as books).

However, industrial applications of such enabling techniques are a priori restricted to US and BM, owing to safety concerns on big scale MW reactors (Figure 5). Microreactors are a relatively new technologies and the small number of patents may also derive from solubility limitation.


Figure 5: Document type dealing with sustainable technologies in CD publications.

This review highlights the most recent synthetic advances in CDs’ chemical modification and some perspectives that make use of non-conventional methods and energy sources. Reaction times and yields have been compared with classic procedures to highlight the huge advantages and potential scalability of these so-called enabling technologies that maximize heat and mass transfer.

Although many advances have been made during the past decade, the most exciting results in this field are surely yet to come.


US irradiation is an environmentally friendly technique that is well suited to the selective chemical modification of CDs from native α-, β- and γ-CD. The use of this method in heterogeneous phase reactions, such as reductions and “click reactions” [14], is well known, as is its use in full CD derivatization in combination with MW irradiation.

Monosubstituted CD derivative preparation

Mono 6I-(p-toluenesulfonyl)-β-CD is the most popular of the CD derivatives because it is a key intermediate in the synthesis of important amino, azido, thio, thiocyanate and halo-derivatives. 6I-(p-toluenesulfonyl)-β-CD was efficiently prepared in an US-assisted procedure by reacting β-CD with tosyl imidazole (TsIm) [15]. Great advantages, in terms of yields, reaction times and product purity, were obtained by using a cavitating tube (40 min, 19.2 kHz, 20 W, yield: 55%).

Thanks to the fast US-assisted inclusion complex formation between β-CD and TsIm reaction times have been dramatically reduced (10 min vs 1–2 hours, Scheme 1).


Scheme 1: Synthesis of 6I-(p-toluenesulfonyl)-β-CD.

More recently, Zheng et al. have described the synthesis of this important intermediate via an US-assisted method in basic water solution [16].

The synthesis of 6I-amino-6I-deoxy-β-CD was also improved by using non-conventional techniques. The catalytic hydrogenation of 6I-azido-6I-deoxy-β-CD using Pd/C was achieved under US irradiation in MeOH/H2O in 20 min (20.4 kHz, 80 W, yield: 88%); hydrogen was supplied at 1 bar pressure [15].

Sonochemical metals depassivation in organometallic reactions is well established [17]. A typical example is the Cu(0)-catalysed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) that can be further enhanced by simultaneous US/MW irradiation [18]. The formation of triazole-substituted CDs has been investigated by US irradiation and products can be synthesized in 2–4 hours (Scheme 2) [19].


Scheme 2: Example of CuAAC with 6I-azido-6I-deoxy-β-CD and phenylacetylene.

Scondo et al. have reported a preliminary study on sonochemical Staudinger-aza-Wittig tandem reactions [20] proving that isocyanate and urea formation is strongly favored. However, the applied power must be optimised for the best conversions of azido-CD into urea to be obtained and if lower efficiency in the second step is to be avoided. 6I-Benzylureido-6I-deoxy-per-O-acetyl-β-CD was obtained in shorter reaction times and excellent yields as compared to conventional conditions (Scheme 3).


Scheme 3: Synthesis of 6I-benzylureido-6I-deoxy-per-O-acetyl-β-CD.

Tosylation of the secondary rim of the CD can be efficiently carried out under US irradiation. This efficient regioselective modification is performed in the presence of tosyl imidazole and molecular sieves under US irradiation. As shown in Table 1, the reaction time was shortened to 2 h for α-CD (yield: 36%), 1 h for β-CD (yield: 40%) and 45 min for γ-CD (yield: 46%) (Scheme 4) [21].


Scheme 4: Synthesis of 3I-azido-3I-deoxy-altro-α, β- and γ-CD.

Table 1: Selected examples of conventional and non-conventional preparation of monosubstituted CDs.

Product Reaction conditions Time Yield (%)
6I-tosyl-β-CD β-CD, Tosyl chloride, NaOH, water, rt [22] 18 h 34
6I-tosyl-β-CD β-CD, TsIm, NaOH, water, US, 20 W [15] 30 min 55–60
2I-tosyl-α-CD α-CD, TsIm, DMF, mol sieves, rt [23] 50 h 35
2I-tosyl-α-CD α-CD, TsIm, DMF, mol sieves, US 20 W [21] 2 h 36
2I-tosyl-β-CD β-CD, TsIm, DMF, mol sieves, rt [23] 50 h 36
2I-tosyl-β-CD β-CD, TsIm, DMF, mol sieves, US 20 W [21] 1 h 40
2I-tosyl-γ-CD γ-CD, TsIm, DMF, mol sieves, rt [24] 120 h 36
2I-tosyl-γ-CD γ-CD, TsIm, DMF, mol sieves, US 20 W [21] 45 min 46
6I-amino-β-CD 6I-azido-6I-deoxy-β-CD, Pd/C, N2H4, MeOH, H2O, reflux [22] 20 min 90
6I-amino-β-CD 6I-azido-6I-deoxy-β-CD, Pd/C, H2, MeOH, H2O, US 20 W [15] 2 h 88

In Table 1 we compared the preparation of several monosubstituted CDs under conventional condition or under US irradiation. The data show that reaction time were dramatically reduced and the yield was generally slightly increased. Under US irradiation, the 6I-amino-β-CD was obtained by catalytic hydrogenation, while under conventional conditions the reduction of azido β-CD was obtained by a Staudinger reaction or in the presence of hydrazine.

A new generation of organophosphate scavengers has been obtained by Le Provost et al. [25] in which β-CD was regioselectively monosubstituted at O-2 using a bromomethyl pyridine derivative under US irradiation to avoid polysubstitution.

Preparation of persubstituted CD derivatives

The complete substitution of all hydroxy groups is difficult because steric hindrance increases upon substitution, the secondary face may be attacked before the last primary hydroxy group has completed the reaction.

Totally persubstituted products are usually obtained in low yields, whereas significant increases in yields have been achieved in reduced reaction times thanks to our sonochemical protocol (35 kHz bath at 20 °C, 160 W; 20 kHz cooled horn, −20 °C, 600 W). We prepared a series of O-peralkylated β- and γ-CDs which are commonly used as stationary phases in high-resolution gas chromatography or as drug carriers [26].

CDs and their persubstituted derivatives have recently received a great deal of attention from the field of chromatographic separations. The development of new CD derivatives as important selectors for analytical chiral recognition have been performed [27]. We prepared heptakis(6-O-TBDMS-2,3-O-methyl)-β-CDs with a second CD unit in the 2 position or a (R)-Mosher acid moiety [28].

Preparation of second generation CD derivatives: dimers, and CD hybrids

Bis-CDs and their metal complexes have been extensively studied as versatile receptors for molecular recognition and building blocks for functional materials.

Due to the binding of two adjacent CD units, bridged bis-CDs display high binding abilities and molecular selectivities compared to native and monosubstituted CDs. A well-organized pseudo-cavity may be provided by the linker that in turn offers additional binding interactions with guest molecules.

New sonochemical protocols for the preparation of bis(β-CDs) bearing 2-2′ and 3-3′ bridges as new carriers for gadolinium complexes have been reported (Scheme 5) [29]. These new CD dimers were promising candidates for MRI applications because their Gd(III)-adducts endowed with high relaxivities thanks to much larger molecular masses than the contrast agents themselves.


Scheme 5: Synthesis of 2-2’ bridged bis(β-CDs). Reaction conditions: 1) TBDMSCl, imidazole, dry pyridine, stirring rt, 8 h; 2) 5-bromopentane, LiH, dry THF–DMSO, reflux, 4 h; 3) acetic anhydride, dry pyridine, MW, 50 °C, 1 h; 4) Grubbs’ catalyst, Ar, dry CH2Cl2, US, 34 °C; 5) KOH, 2 M, MeOH, H2O; US; 40 °C, 30 min; 6) AcCl 2% in MeOH; CH2Cl2, MW, reflux, 15 min.

Furthermore, the potential use of cyanine/β-CD carrier systems has been evaluated via in vitro experiments on HeLa cells and the monitoring of cell entrance via confocal laser scanning microscopy [30]. Several types of dye moiety/CD derivatives have been suggested as "switch on" or "switch off" fluorescent chemical sensors. In these systems, the complexation with a guest molecule allows to enhance or decrease the fluorescence intensity. Two water-soluble cyanine/β-CD derivatives have been efficiently prepared via CuAAC under simultaneous US/MW irradiation at 75 °C for 2 h (MW 15 W and US 20 W) in good yields (23% and 33%). These dyes were used as versatile carriers for drug delivery and optical imaging.

Preparation of CD-grafted materials and CD-based polymers

The reaction of β-CD with diphenyl carbonate (DPC) or hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) afforded crosslinked, insoluble polymers. We synthesized these systems and tested as sequestering agents for naringin [31]. These syntheses were carried out under US with shorter reaction times and smaller particle size distribution.

To investigate the cosmeto-textile applications of CD-grafted materials, a new fabric based on β-CD-grafted viscose loaded with aescin formulations was prepared. This material was designed for the treatment of venous and lymphatic legs. An efficient US-assisted synthetic procedure to graft viscose using a diisocyanate cross-linker was reported (Scheme 6) [32].


Scheme 6: Insoluble reticulated CD polymer.

Sonochemical reticulation with HDI was used in the preparation of a new series of solid cross-linked α-, β- and γ-CD-based catalysts containing Cu(I) or Pd(II) [33]. Sonication breaks up intermicellar interaction and may promote the formation of metal nanoparticle clustering. Cu(I)-based system have been used in alkyne/azide [3 + 2] cycloadditions, while Pd(II)-based catalysts have been used in C–C couplings reactions (Scheme 7) [34].

An example of water-soluble β- and γ-CD/chitosan derivatives have been studied for binding Gd(III) chelates that bear hydrophobic substituents and negative charges [35]. These bio-polymers were easily prepared in two reaction steps by reacting CDs with maleic anhydride followed by activation with carbodiimide to form amide linkages with amino groups of chitosan. The esterification of CD was promoted by MW irradiation, while the chitosan coupling used a water-soluble carbodiimide, N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride, under US.

A mild sonication at rt using HDI enabled efficient CDs reticulation in the presence of lipases (Scheme 7) whose biocatalytic activity was preserved in the final solid cross-linked β-CD enzyme [36].


Scheme 7: CD-HDI cross linked polymers.

Nanosponges are nanostructured materials made of hyper-cross-linked CDs [37]. The capacity of these materials to encapsulate a great variety of substances could be used to design innovative drug carriers, to protect degradable substances and to improve the aqueous solubility of poorly water-soluble molecules. α-, β- and γ-CDs were reacted solventless with diphenyl carbonate or carbonyldiimidazole under US (up to 90 °C). These nanosponges may resolve some active ingredients drawbacks, such as instability, degradation, poor solubility and toxicity, while they can also be used as carriers for inhalation and oral administration treatments [38].

New hybrid materials have been created from a combination of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and β-CD [39] affording a peculiar cost-effective fibre. Functionalized β-CD was covalently linked to CNTs and this derivative was immobilized into the wall pores of the hollow fibre under US [40].


A number of general books and reviews discuss in detail the state-of-the-art of MW-assisted organic synthesis and tailor-made MW reactors have been developed for green organic synthesis [41,42]. The most recent generation of professional reactors dramatically increased the applications of MW-assisted organic synthesis thanks to a high power density (up to 1.5 kW/L), high temperature (up to 300 °C) and pressure (up to 200 bar) together with multi-gas inlets. Considering that MW ovens can be interfaced with autosamplers and that new MW reactors can accommodate multiple racks, this technique is well suited for fast optimization of organic protocols and parallel synthesis. The most impressive advantage of the MW technology is the appearance of the kilolab-scale reactors and their special versions that are operating in continuous flow mode [4,43,44].

Preparation of monosubstituted CD derivatives

MW irradiation has been exploited in the synthesis of mono and persubstituted CDs. Several syntheses of CD derivatives have been successfully carried out under MW with higher yield, higher purity, and short reaction time. While US irradiation has found use in the optimization of synthetic protocols for the preparation of versatile intermediates, such 6I-(p-toluensulfonyl)-β-CD from native β-CD, MW irradiation has proved to be extremely efficient in further derivatization, such as the nucleophilic substitution of monohalogenated and monotosylated CDs (Scheme 8) .


Scheme 8: Derivatization of 6I-(p-toluenesulfonyl)-β-CD by tosyl displacement.

The 6I-azido-6I-deoxy-β-CD, an extremely versatile intermediate, has been obtained from the displacement of the tosylate group under MW. The reaction time was cut from several hours to 2 min (200 W max, 85 °C) and the formation of side products was reduced [15]. 6I-(p-Toluenesulfonyl)-β-CD was converted to 6I-formyl-β-CD via DMSO oxidation in MW with collidine in 15 min (110 W, 135 °C). MW irradiation promoted the syntheses of 6I-deoxy-6I-thio-β-CD and 6I,6IV-dideoxy-6I,6IV-dithio-β-CD via nucleophilic substitution of the primary tosylate ester in C-6 with thiourea followed by basic hydrolysis. The reaction gave the thiouronium salt after 1 h of irradiation at 100 °C while 20 h heating at 90 °C are required under conventional conditions [21].

While the previous experiments were performed in a multimode MW oven (MicroSynth-Milestone, Italy), a similar approach was used for the preparation of an ester prodrug of diclofenac and β-CD, but in a monomode MW oven (CEM Discover S-class MW reactor). The reaction was heated at 140 °C for 40 min and the diclofenac β-CD derivative was obtained with a yield of 20% [45]. Analogously, a general MW-assisted procedure for the synthesis of 6I-amino-6I-deoxy-β-CD has been reported by Puglisi et al. The reactions were performed in a MW oven (CEM Explorer) for 30 min at 200 W and 85 °C [46].

In the Table 2we compared MW vs conventional procedures in the preparation of several monosubstituted derivatives. Besides a slight improvement of formyl and thio derivative yield, the data show a significant reaction rate acceleration.

Table 2: Selected examples of conventional and MW-assisted preparation of monosubstituted CDs.

Product Reaction condition Time Yield (%)
6I-formyl-β-CD 6I-(p-toluenesulfonyl)-β-CD, DMSO, collidine, oil bath, 135 °C [47] 1.5 h 64
6I-formyl-β-CD 6I-(p-toluenesulfonyl)-β-CD, DMSO, collidine, MW (110 W), 135 °C [21] 15 min 68
6I-azido-6I-deoxy-β-CD 6I-(p-toluenesulfonyl)-β-CD, NaN3, DMF, oil bath 60–65 °C [48] 24 h 88
6I-azido-6I-deoxy-β-CD 6I-(p-toluenesulfonyl)-β-CD, NaN3, DMF, MW (200 W) 85 °C [15] 2 min 75
6I-deoxy-6I-thio-β-CD 6I-(p-toluenesulfonyl)-β-CD, thiourea, MeOH/H2O then HCl, oil bath, under reflux [49] 18 h 50
6I-deoxy-6I-thio-β-CD 6I-(p-toluenesulfonyl)-β-CD, thiourea, DMF then NaOH, MW (100 W), 100 °C [21] 20 min 69

Preparation of persubstituted CD derivatives

Selective permodification refers to a complete derivatization of the hydroxy groups in one side of the CD. The selective full substitution on the primary rim is not a trivial task because of the increase of steric hindrance that makes the secondary face prone to an attack before the last primary hydroxy group was reacted [50,51].

Pertosylate and perhalogenated derivatives in position 6 can be substituted with different nucleophiles. However, under conventional conditions, the reactions resulted in complicated mixtures with different substitution degree. MW irradiation efficiently afforded pure products. A series of amino derivatives were obtained by displacement of heptakis(6-deoxy-6-iodo)-β-CD (MW reactor 150 W) at 85 °C for 1 h (yield range 52–69%) [52]. Analogously catalytic hydrogenation in a pressure-resistant MW reactor, gave heptakis(6-amino-6-deoxy)-β-CD from a solution of heptakis(6-azido-6-deoxy)-β-CD in methanol/H2O [53]. The desired product was obtained in 90% yield after 3 h of irradiation at 70 °C. Reaction with isocyanates and isothiocyanate gave ureido and thioureido persubstituted β-CD derivatives in a MW oven at 85 °C for 4 h (see Scheme 9).


Scheme 9: Synthetic scheme for the preparation of heptakis(6-amino-6-deoxy)-β-CD, heptakis(6-deoxy-6-ureido)-β-CD and heptakis(6-deoxy-6-thioureido-)-β-CD.

A multivalent azido-scaffold such as persubstituted 6-azido-6-deoxy-α-, β- or γ-CD with conformational constraints can be efficiently perfunctionalized in a MW- and ligand-assisted click cluster synthesis. An example of the MW-promoted ‘cooperative’ click reaction of azido-CDs has recently been reported and offers useful synthetic insights into a specific labelling strategy [54]. The aforementioned reaction afforded a new series of antimicrobial γ-CD derivatives that strongly disrupt bacterial membranes, and a series of persubstituted γ-CD derivatives bearing polyamino groups (77% yield) [55].

MW-promoted Cu-catalyzed click reaction for the preparation of second generation CD derivatives and hybrid structures

The MW-promoted CuAAC between CD monoazides and acetylenic moieties is the most efficient way to functionalize the CD surface [56]. β-CD is able to form a stable sandwich-type complex with Cu(II) ions, where the CDs faced their secondary rims and the use of heterogeneous phase catalysis may overcome the troubles deriving from time consuming purifications [57]. In 2006 Lipshutz et al. demonstrated that the impregnation of charcoal with an aqueous solution of Cu(NO3)2 in US bath, gave copper nanoparticles: an efficient catalyst in CuAAC [58]. Besides the easier work-up of heterogeneous catalysis, Cu(I)/charcoal also gave a higher yield compared to soluble CuSO4/ascorbic acid (76 vs 95% yield, respectively). The reaction was further improved under MW or simultaneous MW/US irradiation [59].

Recently the preparation of a large number of CD-derivatives by MW-assisted CuAAC regioselective cycloadditions has been described. A selected series of derivatives are depicted in Scheme 10: CD-acryloyl derivative [60,61], β-CD/dye derivatives [31,62-64], CD-ionic liquid hybrids [65,66], CD-based iminosugar conjugates [67], water-soluble CD homo- and heterodimers [68,69], trimers [70,71] and oligomers [72] of α-, β- and γ-CD have all been successfully produced. This wide variety of compounds was obtained in good to excellent yield under MW irradiation (from 20 min to 3 h at 75 °C to 100 °C).


Scheme 10: Structure of CD derivatives obtained via MW-assisted CuAAC.

Preparation of CD-grafted materials and CD-based polymers

Interest in CD polymers has grown over the last few years. CD-based polymers have a number of applications, as drug delivery systems and toxic compounds scavengers, and have been obtained by grafting CDs into polymeric matrices.

A multi-carrier for combined diagnostic and theranostic applications was obtained via the functionalization of carbon nanotubes with CD using a MW-assisted 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition. As depicted in Scheme 11, the synthesis generated in situ azomethine ylides which include both a β-CD unit and a DOTAMA tris(t-butyl ester) moiety. The toxicity assessment, cell viability and permeability of single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) platform, was evaluated on five human cell lines. No-toxicity was observed at concentrations up to 333 μg/mL [73].


Scheme 11: Preparation of SWCN CD-DOTA carrier.

Separately, a facile and rapid MW-assisted method in water has been used to derivatize graphene nanosheets with (2-hydroxy)propyl-β-CD. The reaction involved the esterification of the HP-β-CD hydroxy groups by the carboxyl groups of graphene oxide (GO) by MW irradiation (450 W) at different temperatures ranging from 50 to 100 °C for 10, 30, 60 and 90 min. After reduction with hydrazine hydrate, this HP-β-CD-RGO modified glassy carbon electrode showed good results in supramolecular recognition a set of six different phenolic organic pollutants and a high electrochemical response [74].

CuAAC has been successfully used to immobilize molecules on polymers and biopolymers as well as to join sugars to peptides and proteins. CD-polyglycerol dendron amphiphiles (CD-PG) have also been obtained. This derivative showed high encapsulation efficiency, while nanostructure size and shape were regulated according to the structure of the CD-PG dendrons [75].

CD-based polymers can be easily prepared under MW. Biswas et al. have prepared a number of macromolecular structures from α-, β-, γ-CDs by crosslinking reactions with toluene diisocyanate and methanediphenyl diisocyanate [76]. The authors demonstrated that compared with conventional heating, the reaction was faster (3–10 min) and with higher yields. Analogously, β-CD was grafted onto PEGylated Merrifield resin by reaction with HDI under MW irradiation [77].

CD nanosponges from anhydrous β-CD and diphenylcarbonate in DMF, have been prepared under MW irradiation (400 W) in 90 min. The optimized method was proven to be a unique opportunity for the large-scale synthesis of CD nanosponges in a high yield and uniform particle size distribution [78].

Ball mill

One of the oldest, cheap, and efficient methods to achieve a homogeneous solid mixture is ball milling. By this method extremely fine powders can be achieved in mineral dressing processes, paints and pyrotechnics, etc. [79]. It is suitable for both batch and continuous operation, it is similarly suitable also for open and closed circuit grinding as well as being applicable for materials of all degrees of hardness.

Conventional BMs have a cylindrical or conical shell that rotates on a horizontal axis and have an appropriate grinding medium of balls, for example steel, flint or porcelain. The second generation of BMs, which are often called as high-speed ball mills (HSBM), operate in vibrating, mixer or planetary mode. A very simple vibrating BM, consisting of a small milling cup with one or two balls, has been used for a long time in traditional IR spectrometry to homogenize the sample and KBr. Mixer BM are slightly different from the vibrating version and are not only used in IR spectroscopy but also on the preparative scale for homogenization and cracking solid components. The common weakness of these simple accessories is the critical rotation/mixing speed, which can be overcome by a new generation of equipment; planetary BM, that consist of at least one grinding jar arranged eccentrically on a rotating support. The grinding jar moves in the opposite direction to the sun wheel. The difference in speeds between the balls and grinding jars produces an interaction between frictional and impact forces, which releases high dynamic energies for particles size reduction [80]. Detailed descriptions of both operating modes and theoretical considerations can be found and thoroughly discussed in various product brochures.

An energy efficient method for the preparation of nanocrystalline powders is the high energy ball milling (HEBM) in planetary or vibratory ball mills and HEBM is a common synonym for HSBM [81]. The lower particle size in grinding produces microdeformation in the ground material crystal lattice, while energy is partially spent in creating microstresses, which eventually slow powder grinding. An efficient wet grinding technology can exploit a liquid milling medium.

The preparation of CD and other complexes with the aid of ball milling is well-known [82,83]. In spite of an easy scale-up of this technology, some disadvantages might occur:

  • metastable crystalline complexes can recrystallize to an equilibrium state upon storage [84];
  • the degradation of mill surfaces and subsequent suspension contamination can be a problem, particularly in the high-energy version [85].

Although, the preparation of complexes or microparticles with ball milling is a common procedure, its use in organic synthesis intensified substantially only recently [86]. Solventless mechanochemical reactions are usually highly efficient and selective, valuable properties exploitable in CD derivatization.

Nucleophilic substitutions (SN2 reaction) may occur without solvent stabilization because charged species do not need to be formed in the transition state [87]. Solvent effects and ion pair formation are critical to the mechanism of SN1 reactions meaning that this mechanism is usually restricted in HSBM reactions.

While solid-state intermolecular SN2 reactions depend on contact between interacting particles only, SN1 reactions may show more structure-dependent behaviour, which can be either favourable or unfavourable, because of the solid-state structure.

Although BM reactions are often said to be solvent-free, some inert solvents can also be used particularly when the reagent mass ratio is very high. A lack of solvent(s) may suggest that ball milling conditions favours SN2 reactions; however it is also true that a solventless environment does not necessarily mean that there is a lack of solution in a liquid phase. Some reaction mixture components can often be liquid, while solvent effects or mixed SN2 and SN1-type reaction mechanisms cannot be excluded. A good example of a mixed reaction mechanism is the glycosylation reported by Tyagi et al. [88], where SN2 glycosylation seems to be dominant, with no neighbouring group participation, which is typical of glycosylation reactions of activated acetylated carbohydrates. A more pure SN2 reaction is described by Patil and Kartha [89], where the preparation of thioglycosides was almost quantitative. Unfortunately, a lack of information on reaction mixture compositions means that the reaction mechanism cannot be completely confirmed because chromatographic purifications and recrystallizations distort the enantiomeric ratio.

Basically, three major types of HSBM chemical reaction can occur in the presence of CDs:

  1. Preparation of CD complexes and various chemical reactions on the complexed substructures;
  2. Derivatization of naked, natural CD;
  3. Reactions of activated CD.

While reactions occur between a complexed molecule and reagent or between host and guest in cases 1) and, usually, 2), reaction type 3) requires a CD derivative that bears a good leaving group and the complexation phenomenon can be disadvantageous here. While type 1) can eliminate usually the less problematic solvents only, the application of BM in types 2) and 3) can reduce or eliminate the polluting environment. Reactions of type 1) are dominant in CD/BM literature; more than 98% of publications report the complexation of one or more components. Mechanochemistry opened a new synthetic pathway to the preparation of numerous fullerene derivatives by dissolving C60 in the amorphous powder obtained from the ball milled reactants and β-CD [90]. Another example that uses the energy transfer of ball milling is the preparation of MnBi/Fe-Co core/shell structured composites. However, no pure chemical reaction is used to prepare rare-earth free ferromagnetic materials by grinding under less-environmentally friendly conditions in this case. The components were prepared using classic methods and the final composite was obtained by ball milling of arc-melted MnBi particles and Fe-Co nanoparticles prepared with the aid of a β-CD/oleic acid complex. The composites obtained showed smooth magnetic hysteresis loops [91].

SWCNT edge activation can be carried out via co-grinding with β- or γ-CDs [92]. Although chemical bonds are also broken in this case, this preparation is closer to the BM assisted preparation of CD complexes in many ways. Nanosized manganese oxides have also been prepared from CD/Mn complexes [93], however, in this case, the CD was only used to obtain a charrable matrix for the Mn2O3 which was prepared finally at 450 °C.

The only example of the type 2) method is the regioselective CD derivatization described by Menuel et al. who prepared 2-O-monotosylated α-, β-, and γ-CDs [94]. The further reaction of the prepared compounds resulted in a CD derived cyclic oligosaccharide, which contained one mannose residue, in the form of 2,3-mannoepoxide.

Type 3) reactions in the further derivatization of regioselectively activated – by sulfonic esters or halogenides – CDs are more important in industrial processes involving important CD derivatives. These activated derivatives are usually less soluble in water and their substitution reactions often require high boiling point dipolar aprotic solvents. The complete removal of these solvents is impossible even in gram scale preparations and so the prepared compounds need further purification steps. Additionally, these environmentally unfavorable solvents present other disadvantages; both in their decomposition and toxicology profile. A study of the nucleophilic displacement of 6-monosubstituted β-CDs and the synthesis of 6I-monoazido-6I-monodeoxy-β-CD in HSBM on a preparative scale (5 mmol, 6.5 g) is described in a recent publication by Jicsinszky et al. [95]. Comparing the yields it can be concluded that in larger scale reactions the yields are getting closer to those of the solution reaction. However, since the removal of a high-boiling solvent is not necessary, the work-up becomes simplifyed.

It has to be highlighted that the reaction product should not be considered as a CD derivative when the reaction centre is on the secondary rim because the SN1 mechanism is restricted to solution environment only. The secondary carbon substitution results in inversion in the reaction centre which changes the sugar moiety from glucoside to mannoside, altroside or alloside making those derivatives CD-based cyclic oligosaccharides and not CDs.

The design of green synthetic methods for the bulk preparation of CD thiols and thioethers is an emerging challenge because of the importance of intermediary azido derivatives [96] and favorable aggregation properties in nanomedicines and particularly the antidote Sugammadex [97]. The reaction between 6I-O-monotosyl-β-CD and various nucleophiles opens a new way for the more effective syntheses of per-6-substituted CDs from per-6-bromo- and -iodo-CDs.


The typical lateral dimensions of microreactors, sometimes also called as microstructured or microchannel reactors, are below 1 mm with the most typical form of microchannels [98]. The miniaturized continuous flow reactor, also called microreactor, offers many advantages over conventional scale reactors, including considerable improved energy exploitation, increased reaction speed and yield, safety, reliability, scalability, on-site/on-demand production, etc., and a much finer degree of process control. However microreactors do not tolerate mechanical inhomogeneities. To resolve the problem of microparticles, which often cause clogging, a second generation of microreactors has been developed and called microjetreactor [99]. A typical microreactor is made up of a 'sandwich' of thin metal sheet or plates with fluid (micro)channels that have been etched into both sides. The average size of a single unit is approximately 6 × 4 × 0.5 cm with channel widths and wall thicknesses of 200–300 µm. The reactions occur in every other layer and the other layers are used for heat-exchange fluid flows [100].

The major use of CDs in this equipment, and also in the selective complexation phenomenon, is rather analytical and CDs' principal role is detection only [101]. This has allowed DNA sequencing to become a relatively cheap method and provided momentum to the discovery of the role of genetics in various diseases [102,103]. Although these reactors exhibit an excellent energy and mass efficacy, their use in CD derivatization is just a curiosity. However, exhausting the complexation ability of various CD derivatives is advantageous in solubilization and stereoselective reactions. Delattre and Vijayalakshmi have pointed out the theoretical use of enzymes in the production of CDs or other cyclic oligosaccharides, like cyclofructan, rather than using a microreactor [104].


Dynamic intrusion of the enabling technologies to the CD chemistry is inevitable and shows exponential growth. Although, approximately 10% of the recently published technical papers in the CD field are dealing with sustainable technologies, the number of publications containing information of comparisons with the classical methods is sporadic. Optimized MW-, US- and BM-assisted protocols are energetically more efficient than the classical synthetic methods because their excellent heat and mass transfer. In all cases the reactions are faster avoiding degradations that may occur during protracted heating and time-consuming purifications. Case by case the technique of choice depends from several factors: the solubility of the starting CD, the reaction mechanism, environmental concerns, and the reaction scale are only a part of all the information required to design successful preparations.


  1. Alexandru, L.; Cravotto, G.; Giordana, L.; Binello, A.; Chemat, F. Innovative Food Sci. Emerging Technol. 2013, 20, 167–172. doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2013.07.011
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Crudo, D.; Bosco, V.; Cavaglià, G.; Mantegna, S.; Battaglia, L.; Cravotto, G. Agro Food Ind. Hi-Tech 2014, 25, 55–59.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Rinaldi, L.; Martina, K.; Baricco, F.; Rotolo, L.; Cravotto, G. Molecules 2015, 20, 2837–2849. doi:10.3390/molecules20022837
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Rinaldi, L.; Carnaroglio, D.; Rotolo, L.; Cravotto, G. J. Chem. 2015, 879531. doi:10.1155/2015/879531
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  5. http://Scifinder.cas.org (accessed Oct 22, 2015).
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. http://Sciencedirect.com (accessed Oct 22, 2015).
    (free searchable).
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Cintas, P.; Cravotto, G.; Barge, A.; Martina, K. Top. Curr. Chem. 2015, 369, 239–284. doi:10.1007/128_2014_623
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Ball Milling Towards Green Synthesis Applications, Projects, Challenges. In RSC Green Chemistry; Stolle, A.; Ranu, B., Eds.; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Thomas Graham House, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 0WF, UK. doi:10.1039/9781782621980
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Braga, D.; Grepioni, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4002–4011. doi:10.1002/anie.200301721
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Kumar, V.; Taxak, N.; Jangir, R.; Bharatam, P. V.; Kartha, K. P. R. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 3427–3439. doi:10.1021/jo5001753
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Kumar, V.; Yadav, N.; Kartha, K. P. R. Carbohydr. Res. 2014, 397, 18–26. doi:10.1016/j.carres.2014.08.002
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Rinaldi, L.; Binello, A.; Stolle, A.; Curini, M.; Cravotto, G. Steroids 2015, 98, 58–62. doi:10.1016/j.steroids.2015.02.016
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Lin, H.-L.; Lin, S.-Y.; Lin, C.-C.; Hsu, C.-H.; Wu, T.-K.; Huang, Y.-T. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 512–517. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.010
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Cintas, P.; Tagliapietra, S.; Caporaso, M.; Tabasso, S.; Cravotto, G. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2015, 25, 8–16. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.12.004
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Trotta, F.; Martina, K.; Robaldo, B.; Barge, A.; Cravotto, G. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2007, 57, 3–7. doi:10.1007/s10847-006-9169-z
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  16. Zheng, W. Q.; Du, M. X.; Feng, F.; Chen, G. L.; Liao, M.; Liu, Y. J.; Tang, L.; Xu, Z. G. Adv. Mater. Res. (Durnten-Zurich, Switz.) 2015, 1083, 51–54. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1083.51
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Cintas, P.; Palmisano, G.; Cravotto, G. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2011, 18, 836–841. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.11.020
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Cintas, P.; Barge, A.; Tagliapietra, S.; Boffa, L.; Cravotto, G. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 607–616. doi:10.1038/nprot.2010.1
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Cravotto, G.; Fokin, V. V.; Garella, D.; Binello, A.; Boffa, L.; Barge, A. J. Comb. Chem. 2010, 12, 13–15. doi:10.1021/cc900150d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Scondo, A.; Dumarçay-Charbonnier, F.; Barth, D.; Marsura, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 5582–5584. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.07.082
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Martina, K.; Trotta, F.; Robaldo, B.; Belliardi, N.; Jicsinszky, L.; Cravotto, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 9185–9189. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.10.104
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
  22. Jicsinszky, L.; Iványi, R. Carbohydr. Polym. 2001, 45, 139–145. doi:10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00319-2
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  23. Teranishi, K.; Watanabe, K.; Hisamatsu, M.; Yamada, T. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1998, 17, 489–494. doi:10.1080/07328309808002907
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  24. Teranishi, K.; Tanabe, S.; Hisamatsu, M.; Yamada, T. Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem. 1998, 62, 1249–1252. doi:10.1271/bbb.62.1249
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Le Provost, R.; Wille, T.; Louise, L.; Masurier, N.; Müller, S.; Reiter, G.; Renard, P.-Y.; Lafont, O.; Worek, F.; Estour, F. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 3026–3032. doi:10.1039/c0ob00931h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Cravotto, G.; Nano, G. M.; Palmisano, G. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 2001, 20, 495–501. doi:10.1081/CAR-100106932
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Bicchi, C.; Brunelli, C.; Cravotto, G.; Rubiolo, P.; Galli, M. J. Sep. Sci. 2002, 25, 125–134. doi:10.1002/1615-9314(20020201)25:3<125::AID-JSSC125>3.0.CO;2-W
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Cravotto, G.; Bicchi, C.; Tagliapietra, S.; Costa, L.; Di Carlo, S.; Nervi, C. Chirality 2004, 16, 526–533. doi:10.1002/chir.20069
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Aime, S.; Gianolio, E.; Palmisano, G.; Robaldo, B.; Barge, A.; Boffa, L.; Cravotto, G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 1124–1130. doi:10.1039/b517068k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Carmona, T.; Marcelo, G.; Rinaldi, L.; Martina, K.; Cravotto, G.; Mendicuti, F. Dyes Pigm. 2015, 114, 204–214. doi:10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.11.014
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Binello, A.; Robaldo, B.; Barge, A.; Cavalli, R.; Cravotto, G. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 107, 2549–2557. doi:10.1002/app.27249
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  32. Cravotto, G.; Beltramo, L.; Sapino, S.; Binello, A.; Carlotti, M. E. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 2011, 22, 2387–2395. doi:10.1007/s10856-011-4399-z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Cravotto, G.; Calcio Gaudino, E.; Tagliapietra, S.; Carnaroglio, D.; Procopio, A. Green Process. Synth. 2012, 1, 269–273. doi:10.1515/gps-2012-0029
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Cintas, P.; Cravotto, G.; Calcio Gaudino, E.; Orio, L.; Boffa, L. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 85–87. doi:10.1039/C1CY00378J
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Aime, S.; Gianolio, E.; Uggeri, F.; Tagliapietra, S.; Barge, A.; Cravotto, G. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2006, 10, 931–938. doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2005.12.003
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Junior, I. I.; Calcio Gaudino, E.; Martina, K.; Cravotto, G.; Luque, R.; de Souza, R. O. M. A. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 45772–45777. doi:10.1039/C4RA03797A
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Ma, M.; Li, D. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 872–876. doi:10.1021/cm981090y
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Trotta, F.; Cavalli, R. Compos. Interfaces 2009, 16, 39–48. doi:10.1163/156855408X379388
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Shao, L.; Mu, C. Z.; Du, H. P.; Czech, Z.; Du, H. C.; Bay, Y. P. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 258, 1682–1688. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.09.129
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Song, X.-Y.; Ha, W.; Chen, J.; Shi, Y.-P. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1374, 23–30. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2014.11.029
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. de la Hoz, A.; Loupy, A. Microwaves in Organic Synthesis, 3rd ed.; Wiley-VCH, 2012. doi:10.1002/9783527651313
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Kappe, O.; Stadler, A.; Dallinger, D. Microwaves in Organic and Medicinal Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH, 2012. doi:10.1002/9783527647828
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  43. Alcazar, J.; Diels, G.; Schoentjes, B. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening 2007, 10, 918–932. doi:10.2174/138620707783220383
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  44. Choedkiatsakul, I.; Ngaosuwan, K.; Assabumrungrat, S.; Mantegna, S.; Cravotto, G. Renewable Energy 2015, 83, 25–29. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.04.012
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  45. Vieira, A. C. F.; Serra, A. C.; Carvalho, R. A.; Gonsalves, A.; Figueiras, A.; Veiga, F. J.; Basit, A. W.; Rocha Gonsalves, A. M. d'A. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 93, 512–517. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.12.053
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Puglisi, A.; Spencer, J.; Clarke, J.; Milton, J. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2012, 73, 475–478. doi:10.1007/s10847-011-0054-z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  47. Yoon, J.; Hong, S.; Martin, K. A.; Czarnik, A. W. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2792–2795. doi:10.1021/jo00114a030
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Petter, R. C.; Salek, J. S.; Sikorski, C. T.; Kumaravel, G.; Tyan Lin, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3860–3868. doi:10.1021/ja00166a021
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  49. Franchi, P.; Fanì, M.; Mezzina, E.; Lucarini, M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1901–1904. doi:10.1021/ol800405b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  50. Ashton, P. R.; Ellwood, P.; Staton, I.; Stoddart, J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 80–81. doi:10.1002/anie.199100801
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  51. Jicsinszky, L.; Petró, M.; Horváth, G.; Szejtli, J.; Way, J. L.; Petrikovics, I. Proceedings of the 14th International Cyclodextrin Symposium. Kyoto, Japan, May 8–11, 2008; pp 3–8. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.4290.6088
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  52. Martina, K.; Cravotto, G.; Caporaso, M.; Rinaldi, L.; Villalonga-Barber, C.; Ermondi, G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 5521–5527. doi:10.1039/c3ob40909k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  53. Cravotto, G.; Martina, K.; Caporaso, M.; Heropoulos, G.; Jicsinszky, L. MRS Proceedings 2013, 1492, 177–182. doi:10.1557/opl.2013.176
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  54. Park, G.-H.; Baek, J. M.; Le, H. T.; Lim, C. W.; Kim, T. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 5911–5915. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.08.080
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  55. Yamamura, H.; Sugiyama, Y.; Murata, K.; Yokoi, T.; Kurata, R.; Miyagawa, A.; Sakamoto, K.; Komagoe, K.; Inoue, T.; Katsu, T. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 5444–5446. doi:10.1039/c3cc49543d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  56. Barge, A.; Tagliapietra, S.; Binello, A.; Cravotto, G. Curr. Org. Chem. 2011, 15, 189–203. doi:10.2174/138527211793979826
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  57. Klüfers, P.; Piotrowski, H.; Uhlendorf, J. Chem. – Eur. J. 1997, 3, 601–608. doi:10.1002/chem.19970030416
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  58. Lipshutz, B. H.; Taft, B. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 8235–8238. doi:10.1002/anie.200603726
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  59. Cintas, P.; Martina, K.; Robaldo, B.; Garella, D.; Boffa, L.; Cravotto, G. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 2007, 72, 1014–1024. doi:10.1135/cccc20071014
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  60. Munteanu, M.; Choi, S.; Ritter, H. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 9619–9623. doi:10.1021/ma8018975
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  61. Gingter, S.; Mondrzik, B.; Ritter, H. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 1753–1757. doi:10.1021/ma3002164
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  62. Carmona, T.; Martina, K.; Rinaldi, L.; Boffa, L.; Cravotto, G.; Mendicuti, F. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 1714–1724. doi:10.1039/C4NJ01556H
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  63. Carmona, T.; Mayordomo, N.; Martina, K.; Cravotto, G.; Mendicuti, F. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2012, 237, 38–48. doi:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2012.03.018
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  64. Carmona, T.; Caporaso, M.; Martina, K.; Cravotto, G.; Mendicuti, F. Supramol. Chem. 2015, 27, 508–521. doi:10.1080/10610278.2014.1003217
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  65. Boffa, L.; Calcio Gaudino, E.; Martina, K.; Jicsinszky, L.; Cravotto, G. New J. Chem. 2010, 34, 2013–2019. doi:10.1039/c0nj00021c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  66. Wu, J.; Su, P.; Guo, D.; Huang, J.; Yang, Y. New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 3630–3636. doi:10.1039/C4NJ00030G
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  67. Decroocq, C.; Rodríguez-Lucena, D.; Russo, V.; Mena Barragán, T.; Ortiz Mellet, C.; Compain, P. Chem. – Eur. J. 2011, 17, 13825–13831. doi:10.1002/chem.201102266
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  68. Tran, D. N.; Blaszkiewicz, C.; Menuel, S.; Roucoux, A.; Philippot, K.; Hapiot, F.; Monflier, E. Carbohydr. Res. 2011, 346, 210–218. doi:10.1016/j.carres.2010.11.024
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  69. Cravotto, G.; Mendicuti, F.; Martina, K.; Tagliapietra, S.; Robaldo, B.; Barge, A. Synlett 2008, 2642–2646. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1083379
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  70. Mallard-Favier, I.; Blach, P.; Cazier, F.; Delattre, F. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 161–166. doi:10.1016/j.carres.2008.10.014
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  71. Aime, S.; Gianolio, E.; Arena, F.; Barge, A.; Martina, K.; Heropoulos, G.; Cravotto, G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 370–379. doi:10.1039/B812172A
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  72. Barge, A.; Caporaso, M.; Cravotto, G.; Martina, K.; Tosco, P.; Aime, S.; Carrera, C.; Gianolio, E.; Pariani, G.; Corpillo, D. Chem. – Eur. J. 2013, 19, 12086–12092. doi:10.1002/chem.201301215
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  73. Calcio Gaudino, E.; Tagliapietra, S.; Martina, K.; Barge, A.; Lolli, M.; Terreno, E.; Lembo, D.; Cravotto, G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 4708–4715. doi:10.1039/c4ob00611a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  74. Xu, C.; Wang, J.; Wan, L.; Lin, J.; Wang, X. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 10463–10471. doi:10.1039/c1jm10478k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  75. Rodrigo, A. C.; Malhotra, S.; Böttcher, C.; Adeli, M.; Haag, R. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 61656–61659. doi:10.1039/C4RA11601A
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  76. Biswas, A.; Appell, M.; Liu, Z.; Cheng, H. N. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 133, 74–79. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.044
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  77. Siu, M.; Yaylayan, V. A.; Bélanger, J. M. R.; Paré, J. R. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 3737–3739. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2005.03.154
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  78. Anandam, S.; Selvamuthukumar, S. J. Porous Mater. 2014, 21, 1015–1023. doi:10.1007/s10934-014-9851-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  79. Takacs, L. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7649–7659. doi:10.1039/c2cs35442j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  80. Sopicka-Lizer, M., Ed. High-Energy Ball Milling Mechanochemical Processing of Nanopowders; Woodhead Publishing in Materials; Elsevier Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, 2010; pp 1–422.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  81. Burmeister, C. F.; Kwade, A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7660–7667. doi:10.1039/c3cs35455e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  82. Hedges, A.; Tenbarge, F. Cyclodextrin complexing method. U.S. Patent 5,007,966, April 16, 1991.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  83. Carli, F. In Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Controlled Release of Bioactive Materials, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Boston, MA, USA, June 20–23, 1999; pp 873–874.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  84. Frömming, K.-H.; Szejtli, J. Cyclodextrins in Pharmacy. In Preparation and Characterization of Cyclodextrin Complexes; Szejtli, J., Ed.; Topics in Inclusion Science, Vol. 5; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994; pp 83–104. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8277-3_5
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  85. Khadka, P.; Ro, J.; Kim, H.; Kim, I.; Kim, J. T.; Kim, H.; Cho, J. M.; Yun, G.; Lee, J. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 9, 304–316. doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2014.05.005
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  86. Ranu, B. C.; Stolle, A., Eds. Ball Milling Towards Green Synthesis: Applications, Projects, Challenges; RSC, 2014.
    ISBN: 978-1-84973-945-0.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  87. Vogel, P.; Figueira, S.; Muthukrishnan, S.; Mack, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 55–56. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.10.079
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  88. Tyagi, M.; Khurana, D.; Kartha, K. P. R. Carbohydr. Res. 2013, 379, 55–59. doi:10.1016/j.carres.2013.06.018
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  89. Patil, P. R.; Kartha, K. P. R. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 953–956. doi:10.1039/b904454j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  90. Braun, T.; Buvári-Barcza, Á.; Barcza, L.; Konkoly-Thege, I.; Fodor, M.; Migali, B. Solid State Ionics 1994, 74, 47–51. doi:10.1016/0167-2738(94)90435-9
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  91. Xu, X.; Hong, Y.-K.; Park, J.; Lee, W.; Lane, A. M.; Cui, J. J. Solid State Chem. 2015, 231, 108–113. doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2015.08.019
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  92. Chen, J.; Dyer, M. J.; Yu, M.-F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6201–6202. doi:10.1021/ja015766t
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  93. Najafpour, M. M.; Mostafalu, R.; Kaboudin, B. J. Photochem. Photobiol., B 2015, 152, 106–111. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.02.019
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  94. Menuel, S.; Doumert, B.; Saitzek, S.; Ponchel, A.; Delevoye, L.; Monflier, E.; Hapiot, F. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 6259–6266. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.5b00697
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  95. Jicsinszky, L.; Caporaso, M.; Tuza, K.; Martina, K.; Calcio Gaudino, E.; Cravotto, G. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2015, in press. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01006
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  96. Jicsinszky, L.; Hashimoto, H.; Fenyvesi, E.; Uneo, A. Chapter 4: Cyclodextrin derivatives. In Cyclodextrins; Szejtli, J.; Osa, T., Eds.; Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry, Vol. 3; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1996; pp 57–188.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  97. Naguib, M. Anesth. Analg. 2007, 104, 575–581. doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000244594.63318.fc
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  98. Watts, P.; Wiles, C. Chem. Commun. 2007, 443–467. doi:10.1039/B609428G
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  99. Wille, C.; Gabski, H.-P.; Haller, T.; Kim, H.; Unverdorben, L.; Winter, R. Chem. Eng. J. 2004, 101, 179–185. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2003.11.007
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  100. http://faculty.washington.edu/finlayso/che475/microreactors/Group_A/whatmrex.htm.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  101. Rezzonico, F. Astrobiology 2014, 14, 344–351. doi:10.1089/ast.2013.1120
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  102. Sapra, K. T.; Bayley, H. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, No. 848. doi:10.1038/srep00848
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  103. Feng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ying, C.; Wang, D.; Du, C. Genomics, Proteomics Bioinf. 2015, 13, 4–16. doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2015.01.009
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  104. Delattre, C.; Vijayalakshmi, M. A. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2009, 60, 97–105. doi:10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.04.016
    Return to citation in text: [1]

Article is part of the series

Interesting articles

Laszlo Jicsinszky, Marina Caporaso, Katia Martina, Emanuela Calcio Gaudino and Giancarlo Cravotto

Olga Eguaogie, Patrick F. Conlon, Francesco Ravalico, Jamie S. T. Sweet, Thomas B. Elder, Louis P. Conway, Marc E. Lennon, David R. W. Hodgson and Joseph S. Vyle

Laszlo Jicsinszky, Marina Caporaso, Katia Martina, Emanuela Calcio Gaudino and Giancarlo Cravotto


Logo OA

Submission is open for “Spatial Effects in Polymers” and "Lipids"

Logo OA

The 2015 Impact Factor is 2.697 according to the Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports.

© 2016 Cravotto et al; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

Back to Article List