Free vibration of functionally graded carbon-nanotube-reinforced composite plates with cutout

  1. 1 and
  2. 2,§
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Qom, Qom, Iran
2Faculty of Engineering, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
  1. Corresponding author email
Guest Editor: T. Glatzel
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7, 511–523. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.7.45
Received 18 Nov 2015, Accepted 22 Mar 2016, Published 07 Apr 2016
Full Research Paper
cc by logo
Album

Abstract

During the past five years, it has been shown that carbon nanotubes act as an exceptional reinforcement for composites. For this reason, a large number of investigations have been devoted to analysis of fundamental, structural behavior of solid structures made of carbon-nanotube-reinforced composites (CNTRC). The present research, as an extension of the available works on the vibration analysis of CNTRC structures, examines the free vibration characteristics of plates containing a cutout that are reinforced with uniform or nonuniform distribution of carbon nanotubes. The first-order shear deformation plate theory is used to estimate the kinematics of the plate. The solution method is based on the Ritz method with Chebyshev basis polynomials. Such a solution method is suitable for arbitrary in-plane and out-of-plane boundary conditions of the plate. It is shown that through a functionally graded distribution of carbon nanotubes across the thickness of the plate, the fundamental frequency of a rectangular plate with or without a cutout may be enhanced. Furthermore, the frequencies are highly dependent on the volume fraction of carbon nanotubes and may be increased upon using more carbon nanotubes as reinforcement.

Introduction

Plates with cutouts are extensively used in automotive and aircraft structures. Cutouts may be of rectangular, circular, elliptical, super elliptical or polygonal shape. Due to the complicated configuration of a plate with a cutout, there is significantly less research on plates with cutouts in comparison to those without cut-out. Depending on the application, homogeneous isotropic, composite or functionally graded plates may be perforated to fulfill a desired application.

Representing a type of novel material with fascinating electro-thermo-mechanical properties, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have attracted increasing attention in the past decades. CNTs are a promising candidate for the reinforcement of the matrix phase in a composite. Kwon et al. [1] reported that using a powder metallurgy fabrication process, carbon-nanotube-reinforced composites (CNTRCs) may be achieved with a nonuniform distribution of CNTs through the media. This type of reinforced composite media is known as functionally graded carbon-nanotube-reinforced composite (FG-CNTRC). An overview on the properties, modeling and characteristics of FG-CNTRC beams, plates and shells is provided by Liew et al. [2]

It has been shown that the bending moment may be significantly alleviated through a functionally graded distribution of CNTs in a polymeric matrix [3]. In the five years following the discovery of this interesting feature, various investigations were reported on the mechanics of FG-CNTRC structures.

Zhu et al. [4] investigated the free vibration and static response of FG-CNTRC plates using finite element method [4]. Zhang et al. investigated the free vibration characteristics of FG-CNTRC skew plates [5], triangular plates [6] and cylindrical panels [7] using element free methods. In these works it is shown that the natural frequencies of plates and panels are affected by the distribution and volume fraction of CNTs. Zhang et al. [8] investigated the free vibration characteristics of FG-CNTRC plates resting on an elastic foundation. Lei et al. [9] investigated the free vibration of composite, laminated FG-CNTRC plates with general boundary conditions. Malekzadeh and Zarei [10] examined the free vibration characteristics of laminated plates containing FG-CNTRC layers in an arbitrary straight-sided quadrilateral shape. Malekzadeh and Heydarpour [11] investigated the free vibration and static response of laminated plates with FG-CNTRC layers using a mixed Navier-layerwise differential quadrature method. In this research, plates with all edges simply supported are considered. Natarajan et al. [12] applied a higher order shear and normal deformable plate formulation to study the static and free vibrations of single layer FG-CNTRC plates and also sandwich plates with FG-CNTRC face sheets. Wang and Shen investigated the linear and nonlinear free vibrations of a single layer FG-CNTRC plate [13] and also sandwich plates with stiff core and FG-CNTRC face sheets [14]. In this analysis, the interaction of the plate with a two parameter elastic foundation is also taken into account. Wang and Shen [15] investigated the dynamic response of FG-CNTRC plates according to the von Kármán formulation. In this research, the interaction of a two parameter elastic foundation and a thermal environment are also included. The solution method of this research is based on a two-step perturbation technique and is suitable for plates with all edges simply supported. Using a mesh-free formulation proper for arbitrary edge supports, Lei et al. [16] investigated the elasto-dynamic response of FG-CNTRC plates subjected to sudden lateral pressure. For more investigations on vibration, buckling, postbuckling, stress analysis, and nonlinear bending of FG-CNTRC plates, one may refer to [17-25].

The present research aims to investigate the free vibration characteristics of an FG-CNTRC rectangular plate containing a central, rectangular cutout. The distribution of CNTs across the plate thickness are assumed to be either uniform or nonuniform. A modified rule of mixtures approach is used to obtain the properties of the composite media. Chebyshev polynomials are used as the basic shape functions of the Ritz formulation to construct an eigenvalue problem. The solution method may be used for perforated FG-CNTRC rectangular plates with arbitrary boundary conditions on the outer edges, while the inner edges are unconstrained. The numerical results allow for the study of the volume fraction and distribution pattern of CNTs, plate boundary conditions and hole size.

Modeling

Basic formulation

A rectangular-shaped plate, made of a polymeric matrix, reinforced by CNTs whose distribution may be nonuniform, is considered in the present research. The plate contains a centered hole, which is assumed to be rectangular-shaped. The cartesian coordinate system is assigned to the center of the mid-surface of the plate. In this system, the plate occupies the domain [−0.5a 0.5a] × [−0.5b 0.5b] × [−0.5h 0.5h]. The hole occupies the domain [−0.5c 0.5c] × [−0.5d 0.5d] × [−0.5h 0.5h]. The dimensions of the plate with the assigned coordinate system are demonstrated in Figure 1.

[2190-4286-7-45-1]

Figure 1: A schematic of the geometric features of the plate along with the assigned coordinate system.

Motivated by the fundamental research of Shen [3], many investigators take into account the functionally graded distribution of the volume fraction of reinforcements through the matrix. Consistent with the possible fabrication processes for plates, three different functionally graded types of CNT dispersion profiles may be assumed and are considered in the present research: FG-V, FG-O and FG-X [5-7]. A schematic of these functionally graded types along with the uniformly distributed (UD) type are shown in Figure 2.

[2190-4286-7-45-2]

Figure 2: Various graded patterns of FG-CNTRC plates.

The properties of a composite media (i.e., a matrix reinforced with CNTs) may be obtained according to various homogenization techniques. The two commonly used schemes that are extensively used for composites and FGMs are the Mori–Tanaka scheme [26] and the rule of mixtures [27]. The conventional rule of mixtures has the advantage of simplicity; however, when using CNTRCs, this approach does not provide an accurate estimation of the mechanical properties of the media. Meanwhile, as explained by Shen [3] and used extensively by other researchers [28-32], the conventional rule of mixtures approach may be modified with the introduction of the efficiency parameters. Under such modification, Young’s modulus and the shear modulus of the composite media take the form:

[2190-4286-7-45-i1]
(1)

In this formula, the properties of the CNT are denoted by a superscript CN and that those belong to matrix are denoted by a superscript m. Following the classical solid mechanics notation, E and G are the elastic modulus and shear modulus of the constituents, respectively. In comparison to the conventional rule of mixtures approach, three unknown constants, η1, η2 and η3, are introduced in Equation 1; these are known as efficiency parameters. These parameters compensate for the errors generated due to the conventional rule of mixtures approach for a CNTRC. The values of these constants are obtained by matching the data obtained according to the above formula with those obtained based on the molecular dynamics simulation.

It is worth noting that the volume fraction of CNTs and polymeric matrix are denoted by VCN and Vm, respectively. According to the partition of unity property, the following condition should be satisfied at each point of the composite media: VCN + Vm = 1.

The volume fraction of CNTs is assumed to be either nonuniform or uniform across the plate thickness. According to the above rule, the volume fraction of matrix may also be achieved and the overall properties of the media may be calculated according to Equation 1. Table 1 presents the dispersion profile of VCN as a function of the thickness coordinate for each of the UD CNTRC or FG-CNTRC rectangular plates.

Table 1: Volume fraction of CNTs as a function of the thickness coordinate for various CNT distributions [28-34].

CNT Distribution VCN
UD CNTRC [Graphic 1]
FG-V CNTRC [Graphic 2]
FG-O CNTRC [Graphic 3]
FG-X CNTRC [Graphic 4]

Upon evaluation of the total volume fraction of CNTs across the plate thickness, it is revealed that all types have the same total volume fraction of CNTs, that is, [Graphic 5]. Consequently, the vibrational characteristics of FG-CNTRC and UD-CNTRC rectangular plates may be compared with respect to each other. As previously shown in Figure 2 and the information in Table 1, given an FG-X pattern of CNT dispersion, the mid-surface of the plate is free of CNTs while the top and bottom surfaces have the maximum volume fraction of CNTs. The volume fraction of CNTs increases linearly from the mid-plane to the free surfaces of the plate. The FG-O type of distribution pattern is the inverse of the FG-X case. In the FG-O distribution, the top and bottom surfaces are free of CNTs and the mid-surface has the maximum volume fraction of CNTs. In FG-V type, the bottom surface is free of CNTs and the top has the maximum volume fraction of CNTs. Unlike these three types, in the UD case, each surface of the plate has the same volume fraction of CNTs.

Similar to the shear modulus and Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio and the mass density of the composite media may be written in terms of belongings to the CNT and matrix. As claimed by Shen [28], and as used also by other researchers [29], Poisson’s ratio depends weakly on position and consequently may be obtained as

[2190-4286-7-45-i2]
(2)

The mass density of a CNTRC media may be obtained according to the conventional rule of mixtures approach [13,14]. Therefore, as a function of volume fraction and mass density of constituents, ρCN and ρm, one may write

[2190-4286-7-45-i3]
(3)

Upon evaluation of the mass fraction for each of the graded patterns of CNTs, it is concluded that each type has the same mass fraction of CNTs.

Flexural theories propose an approximate function for the in-plane and out-of-plane displacement components of the plate. The most simple flexural theory is the classical plate theory, which eliminates the transverse shear strain components as well as the normal strain component. These assumptions are exaggerated for moderately thick composites and therefore classical plate theory results in erroneous results for the structural response of a CNTRC rectangular plate. On the other hand, first order shear deformation plate theory (FSDT), which takes into account the constant transverse shear strain, results in accurate results for the global properties of moderately thick CNTRC plates. This is because it takes into account both the rotary inertias and through-the-thickness shear strains [35]. This research is also developed based on FSDT, which estimates the displacements of the plate in terms of those of the mid-surface and the cross-section rotations as

[2190-4286-7-45-i4]
(4)

In Equation 4, the subscript zero indicates the characteristics of the mid-plane. Rotations of the cross-sectional elements about the x and y axes are denoted by φy and φx. Additionally, displacements along the x, y and z directions are shown by u, v and w.

The substitution of Equation 4 into the strain–displacement relations results in the components of strain on an arbitrary point of the plate in terms of mid-surface strain components and change in curvature as

[2190-4286-7-45-i5]
(5)

The strain field on the midsurface of the plate may be obtained according to the midsurface displacements as

[2190-4286-7-45-i6]
(6)

and the change of curvatures may be obtained in terms of cross-section rotations as

[2190-4286-7-45-i7]
(7)

where in Equation 6 and Equation 7 (and hereafter), the comma in the subscript indicates the derivative with respect to the variable following the comma.

Under linear elastic behavior of the composite media, the strain components may be obtained in terms of strain components according to the following generalized Hook law as

[2190-4286-7-45-i8]
(8)

where the plane-stress stiffnesses of the plate are denote by Qij components (i,j = 1,2,4,5,6). These constants may be obtained in terms of the Poisson’s ratio, shear modulus and Young’s modulus of the composite plate as [29]

[2190-4286-7-45-i9]
(9)

To construct the motion equations of the plate, the Hamilton principle may be used [35]. For free vibration analysis where external forces/moments are absent, Hamilton’s principle may be written as

[2190-4286-7-45-i10]
(10)

where δU is the virtual strain energy of the perforated plate which may be calculated as

[2190-4286-7-45-i11]
(11)

In the above equation and in the rest of this work, the subscripts 1 and 2 denote a solid rectangle (i.e., a solid rectangle without a cutout) and the cutout segment, respectively. The strain energies may be obtained upon integration of the density of the strain energy over the suitable volume.

[2190-4286-7-45-i12]
(12)

where the shear correction factor is denoted by κ. This parameter is used to compensate for the errors due to the assumption of constant shear strains across the thickness. The exact value of this factor is not straightforward and may be obtained under evaluation of complicated integrals. Since the exact value of this factor depends on the boundary conditions, geometry of the media, material and loading, the approximate value of κ = 5/6 is used in the present research.

Similarly, δT is the variation of the kinetic energy of the plate which also may be written as

[2190-4286-7-45-i13]
(13)

where the kinetic energy may be obtained as

[2190-4286-7-45-i14]
(14)

Solution procedure

It is known that the equations of motion for a plate with three translational motion and two rotational motion components may be achieved using the process of virtual displacements with the aid of the Green–Gauss theorem. On the other hand, the matrix representation of the equations of motion may be established using the application of energy methods to Equation 10. As one of the most widely known energy-based methods, the Ritz method is used in the present research. The effectiveness and efficiency of various types of Ritz methods has been the subject of many studies [36-39]. In this study, the approximation of the displacement field is carried out using the Ritz method whose shape functions are written in terms of the Chebyshev polynomials. As a result, the essential variables may be written as

[2190-4286-7-45-i15]
(15)

In Equation 15, the i-th Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind is denoted by Pi. These functions in a closed-form expression may be written as

[2190-4286-7-45-i16]
(16)

Additionally, in Equation 15, the auxiliary functions (Rα(x,y), where α = u,v,w,x,y) are called the boundary functions, which are associated with the essential boundary conditions. It is known that in the Ritz method, the shape functions should at least satisfy the essential boundary conditions.

Three types of mechanical boundary conditions are widely used for each of the edges of the plate: clamped (C), simply supported (S) and free (F) edges are the assumed types of boundary conditions in the present study. For a clamped edge, three components of the displacement field and two components of the rotation should be zero at the edge. For a simply supported one, the tangential displacement, tangential rotation and lateral displacement should be zero. Finally, for a free edge, none of the boundary conditions are applied, and therefore, none of the displacements and rotations are restrained at the edge. On each exterior edge of the plate, various boundary conditions may be defined; however, the interior edges are all assumed to be free and none of the boundary conditions around the hole are applied.

Since the Chebyshev polynomials of the fist kind are nonzero on both ends of the interval (i.e., Pi(±1) ≠ 0), the auxiliary functions Rα, α = u,v,w,x,y should be chosen to satisfy the essential boundary conditions on the edge when necessary. Each of the auxiliary functions Rα, α = u,v,w,x,y may be written generally as

[2190-4286-7-45-i17]
(17)

The newly introduced parameters, p, q, r and s, are equal to zero or one and their magnitude depends on the essential boundary conditions at the edge. As an example, consider a perforated plate with clamped boundary conditions at x = −0.5a and x = +0.5a, free at y = −0.5b, and simply supported at y = +0.5b. For such a case, the auxiliary functions (Rα, where α = u,v,w,x,y) are given as

[2190-4286-7-45-i18]
(18)

Finally, the substitution of the series expansion of Equation 15 into Equation 12 and Equation 14, and inserting the results into the Hamilton principle of Equation 10 results in the motion equations given as

[2190-4286-7-45-i19]
(19)

In the above equation, M is the mass matrix and, K is the stiffness matrix. Additionally, the mechanical displacement vector is denoted by X, which consists of the unknown displacements Uij, Vij, Wij, Xij and Yij.

Since the free vibration response is under investigation, X = [Graphic 6] sin(ω t+φ) may be considered, where ω is the natural frequency. The substitution of this equation into Equation 19 results in an eigenvalue problem as

[2190-4286-7-45-i20]
(20)

This eigenvalue problem can be solved using the standard eigenvalue algorithms provided in a Matlab code. It is worth noting that trapezoidal numerical integration is used to evaluate the elements of the mass and stiffness matrices. In numerical integration, the interval is divided into 100 segments.

Results and Discussion

The free vibration characteristics of FG-CNTRC rectangular plates with a centric rectangular hole were formulated in the previous sections. In the following, to assure the effectiveness and accuracy of the presented solution method, convergence and comparison studies are carried out. Next, parametric studies are provided to explore the effects of carbon nanotube characteristics on the frequencies of the perforated plate. The following convention is established for boundary conditions herein and is used in the rest of this work. For instance, an SCFS plate indicates a plate which is simply supported at x = −0.5a and y = +0.5b, clamped at y = −0.5b, and free at x = +0.5b.

In the numerical results of the present research, isotropic poly(methyl methacrylate), referred to as PMMA, is selected as the polymeric matrix. The mechanical properties of the PMMA are Em = 2.5 GPa, νm = 0.34 and ρm = 1150 kg/m3. Reinforcement of the matrix is chosen as (10,10)-armchair SWCNT. For this kind of reinforcement, which is orthotropic, the material properties are given as [Graphic 7] = 5.6466 TPa, [Graphic 8] = 7.0800 TPa, G12 = 1.9445 TPa, ν = 0.175 and ρ = 1400 kg/m3 [40].

Finally, the efficiency parameters should be known to obtain the overall properties of the composite media, which are the stretching, coupling and bending stiffnesses. As mentioned before, these parameters are obtained by matching the data obtained by the present modified rule of mixtures approach and the molecular dynamics simulations of other researchers. A molecular dynamics simulation was performed by Han and Elliott [41]; however, since the condition of maximum thickness for CNTs was not satisfied in this research, their simulations were re-examined by Shen [28]. In the simulations of Han and Elliott [41], the effective thickness of the CNTs is set equal to at least 0.34 nm, which is open to criticism since it violates the criteria proposed by Wang and Zhang [42]. The molecular dynamics simulations of Shen [28] result in the following efficiency parameters for the CNTRC media that depend on the volume fraction of CNTs: η1 = 0.137 and η2 = 1.022 for [Graphic 9] = 0.12; η1 = 0.142 and η2 = 1.626 for [Graphic 10] = 0.17; and η1 = 0.141 and η2 = 1.585 for [Graphic 11] = 0.28. For each case, the efficiency parameter η3 is equal to 0.7η2. The shear modulus G13 is taken equal to G12, whereas G23 is taken equal to 1.2G12 [28].

Convergence and comparison studies

Convergence and comparison studies are presented in this section. First, the convergence study allows for the necessary shape functions to be obtained with the series expansion of the Ritz method, with results shown in Table 2. In this study, the first three frequency parameters of a square plate with a square cutout at the center are evaluated in terms of the number of shape functions. Two different cutout sizes are considered. The results are also compared with those of Liew et al. [43] and Lam et al. [44]. In the solution method of Liew et al. [43], the basic L-shaped element, which is divided into appropriate sub-domains that are dependent upon the location of the cutout, is used as the basic building element. Lam et al. [44], on the other hand, obtained the frequencies according to a Ritz method whose shape functions are generated using the Gram–Schmidt process. In both of the above-mentioned references, the plate is formulated using the classical plate theory and for the sake of comparison, in the present analysis, the side-to-thickness ratio is chosen as a/h = 100. It is seen that the results of our study match well with those of Liew et al. [43] and Lam et al. [44] after the adoption of Nx = Ny = 20 shape functions. Therefore, in the subsequent results, the number of shape functions in both directions is chosen as 20.

Table 2: Convergence study on the first three frequency parameters [Graphic 12] of SSSS isotropic homogeneous square plates with a/h = 100, ν = 0.3 and two cutout ratios.

Nx = Ny c/a=0.5 c/a=0.3
  [Graphic 13] [Graphic 14] [Graphic 15] [Graphic 16] [Graphic 17] [Graphic 18]
4 25.3219 67.0738 96.5711 21.2056 59.9002 91.5117
6 24.3337 52.4935 79.6489 20.7782 49.9952 76.7551
8 23.9120 48.0090 76.8117 20.3092 49.4326 76.0125
10 23.7717 44.2278 74.2547 19.9607 48.9185 75.6918
12 23.7394 42.6920 72.9483 19.8747 48.1375 75.3304
14 23.7177 42.1001 72.4587 19.8625 47.2216 74.9326
16 23.6514 41.6152 72.1370 19.7767 46.4394 74.6078
18 23.5996 41.2933 71.8660 19.7260 45.9450 74.3541
20 23.5641 41.0550 71.7298 19.6490 45.5670 74.2122
Liew et al. [43] 23.441 41.779 71.737 19.391 44.799 73.656
Lam et al. [44] 23.235 39.712 69.868 19.357 44.207 73.906

In Table 3, the first four frequencies of a plate with a centric cutout clamped all around is evaluated. In this study, the plate is also a square, and for the sake of comparison, the side-to-thickness ratio is chosen as a/h = 100. Four different square cutout sizes, c/a = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.5, are considered and in each case our results are compared with those of Malekzadeh et al. [45] and Mundkur et al. [46]. Malekzadeh et al. [45] obtained the frequencies according to a three dimensional elasticity formulation and using the Chebyshev–Ritz formulation, whereas boundary characteristics of orthogonal polynomial functions are invoked into the Ritz formulation by Mundkur et al. [46] to obtain the plate frequencies. It is seen that our results are in good agreement with those of both Malekzadeh et al. [45] and Mundkur et al. [46].

Table 3: First four frequency parameters [Graphic 19] for square CCCC isotropic homogeneous plates with ν = 0.3, a/h = 100 and various square cutout sizes.

c/a Source [Graphic 20] [Graphic 21] [Graphic 22] [Graphic 23]
0.1 Malekzadeh et al. [45] 36.7943 73.9968 74.0389 108.1382
  Mundkur et al. [46] 36.5045 73.4142 73.4142 107.3528
  Present 36.3141 73.2476 73.2476 106.9850
0.2 Malekzadeh et al. [45] 37.9162 73.8299 73.8882 105.9458
  Mundkur et al. [46] 38.1073 73.6267 73.6267 105.4715
  Present 37.2017 72.7578 72.7578 104.7691
0.3 Malekzadeh et al. [45] 41.6279 71.2093 71.3769 103.6814
  Mundkur et al. [46] 41.7912 73.9799 73.9799 104.3388
  Present 40.9624 69.0943 69.0943 101.9502
0.5 Malekzadeh et al. [45] 66.5457 79.1407 79.2248 109.2086
  Mundkur et al. [46] 65.7150 81.6796 81.6796 110.8569
  Present 65.3050 77.7074 77.7074 107.5626

Table 4 presents the frequencies of a thin square plate that is simply supported all around and contains a square cutout at the center. The cutout size is c/a = 0.4 and for the sake of comparison, the side-to-thickness ratio of the square plate is chosen as a/h = 100. The results of this study are compared with those of Liew et al. [43]. In the tabulated results, SS indicates the double-symmetric modes and AA indicates the double-antisymmetric modes. On the other hand, modes that are symmetric in one direction and antisymmetric on the other direction are denoted by AS. Again, it is seen that the results of our study are in good agreement with the available data, which verifies the accuracy of the present method.

Table 4: Frequency parameters, [Graphic 24] for square SSSS isotropic homogeneous plates with a square cutout with ν = 0.3, c/a = 0.4 and a/h = 100.

Mode Type Source [Graphic 25] [Graphic 26] [Graphic 27]
SS Liew et al. [43] 20.7240 85.4180 136.2900
  Present 20.9151 85.8040 136.1697
AS Liew et al. [43] 41.9070 118.7200 181.7200
  Present 42.1561 119.6766 177.3160
AA Liew et al. [43] 71.4990 189.3300 200.9000
  Present 71.9878 188.1986 198.4664

The next comparison study gives the frequency parameters of the FG-CNTRC plate with clamped boundary conditions. The frequencies are evaluated from the proposed approach of our study and compared with those given by Zhu et al. [4] based on the finite elements method. It is worth noting that in the analysis of Zhu et al. [4], the matrix is made from PmPV with elasticity modulus Em = 2.1 GPa, Poisson’s ratio νm = 0.34 and mass density ρm = 1150 kg/m3. The volume fraction of CNTs is set equal to 0.17 and the dispersion pattern of the CNTs is of the FG-V type. In such case, the efficiency parameters are obtained as η1 = 0.149 and η2 = η3 = 1.381 [4]. Furthermore, G23 = G13 = G12 is assumed [4]. The frequency parameter is defined as [Graphic 28] as shown in Table 5. As can be seen, the first six frequencies are in good agreement with those obtained by Zhu et al. [4].

Table 5: First six natural frequencies [Graphic 29] of square CCCC FG-CNTRC plates without cutout and various side-to-thickness ratios.

  a/h = 10 a/h = 20 a/h = 50
[Graphic 30] Present Zhu et al. [4] Present Zhu et al. [4] Present Zhu et al. [4]
[Graphic 31] 21.4953 21.544 32.5463 32.686 41.7819 42.078
[Graphic 32] 28.4093 28.613 38.9996 39.279 47.7825 48.309
[Graphic 33] 41.2024 41.431 53.4057 54.560 62.3669 63.755
[Graphic 34] 41.2818 42.119 69.5133 70.149 86.1407 90.293
[Graphic 35] 45.5711 45.796 73.3744 73.926 104.7524 106.513
[Graphic 36] 46.9814 47.055 75.1651 78.522 108.3582 110.055

The next comparison study is devoted to the case of a nonsquare plate with a nonsquare cutout. A thin plate with a/h = 100 and CSCS boundary conditions is considered. The length-to-width ratio is equal to a/b = 1.125. The cutout dimensions are the same as those of Liew et al. [43], that is, c/a = 1/3 and d/b = 1/3. The first four frequencies of the plate are obtained and compared with the available data in the literature. It is worth noting that, in this case, the experimental results of Aksu and Ali [47] are also available. A comparison is provided in Table 6. It is seen that the results of our study match well with the available data in the literature.

Table 6: First four frequency parameters, [Graphic 37], for a CSCS, rectangular, isotropic, homogeneous plate with a rectangular cutout with ν = 0.3, c/a = d/b = 1/3, a/b = 9/8 and a/h = 100.

[Graphic 38] Liew et al. [43] Aksu et al. [47] (Exp.) Aksu et al. [47] Lam et al. [44] Present
[Graphic 39] 32.425 33.22 33.83 34.04 31.2802
[Graphic 40] 53.426 53.01 53.99 54.57 54.2069
[Graphic 41] 62.353 61.91 62.49 65.05 60.0453
[Graphic 42] 94.839 91.87 95.03 95.38 92.0645

Table 7 presents the fundamental and second symmetric modes of the frequency parameters of a unidirectional, orthotropic plate in a square platform with a centric square cutout. The material properties of the layer are E11 = 140 GPa, E22 = 3.5 GPa, G12 = 0.5 GPa, ν12 = 0.25 and ρ = 4000 kg/m3. The plate is simply supported all around and a cutout size is chosen as c/a = 0.5. The results are provided for various side-to-thickness ratios. A comparison is made between the results of our study with those obtained by Reddy [48] based on the finite elements method and by Ovesy and Fazilati [49] based on the finite strip method. The results are provided in Table 7. It can be seen that the results of our study match well with the available data in the literature, which proves the correctness of the formulation and solution method of the present research.

Table 7: Fundamental and second symmetric mode frequency parameters, [Graphic 43], for a SSSS, square, unidirectional, orthotropic plate with a square cutout with c/a = d/b = 1/2 and various a/h ratios.

  [Graphic 44] [Graphic 45]
h/a Reddy [48] Ovesy and Fazilati [49] Present Reddy [48] Ovesy and Fazilati [49] Present
0.010 51.232 51.608 51.4407 112.220 111.399 112.8712
0.040 48.907 49.049 49.0386 103.430 102.478 103.4018
0.050 47.934 47.975 47.9682 100.100 99.129 99.8877
0.100 42.693 42.108 42.0505 83.451 82.654 82.4266
0.200 34.069 32.416 32.1979 59.074 59.071 60.7709

Parametric studies

After validating the formulation and proposed method of the present research, the parametric studies are provided in this section. In this section, the frequency parameter is defined as [Graphic 46], where Dm is the flexural rigidity of a plate made from the polymeric matrix.

Tables 8–11 present the first five frequencies of CNTRC plates in a square shape and side-to-thickness ratio of a/h = 20. Table 8, Table 9, Table 10 and Table 11 are associated with CCCC, CFFF, SSSS and CFCF plates, respectively. The volume fraction of CNTs is chosen as [Graphic 47] = 0.17. In each case, the frequencies are provided for three different perforation sizes and four different graded patterns of CNTs. It is seen that, similar to the case of plates without a cutout, in plates with a hole, FG-X also has the highest fundamental frequency and FG-O has the lowest. The influence of hole size on fundamental frequency is not monotonic. For instance, in CCCC plates, the fundamental frequency of a plate increases when the hole size increases from c/a = 0.1 to 0.3 and 0.5. This conclusion is qualitatively compatible with the results of Malekzadeh et al. [45] for CCCC FGM plates. For SSSS and CFFF plates, on the other hand, the trend is the inverse and the fundamental frequency of a plate decreases when the hole size increases from c/a = 0.1 to 0.3 and 0.5. The results presented in Tables 8–11 contain both the flexural and extensional as well as coupled (in FG-V type) vibrational modes. As seen from Table 10, the fourth and fifth frequencies of SSSS plates without a cutout or with a cutout size of c/a = 0.1 and 0.3 are the same. These frequencies are in-plane modes and, due to the symmetry of geometry and boundary conditions, they are equal. It is seen that the in-plane frequencies of FG-X and FG-O plates are equal.

Table 8: First five natural frequency parameters for square FG-CNTRC CCCC plates with a centric cutout. Geometrical characteristics of the plate are a/b = 1, h/a = 0.05 and various c/a ratios. The volume fraction of CNTs is set equal to [Graphic 48] = 0.17.

c/a Type [Graphic 49] [Graphic 50] [Graphic 51] [Graphic 52] [Graphic 53]
0.0 UD 104.7581 127.4624 177.3348 216.4439 229.8165
  FG-X 112.9857 136.1313 187.5684 228.1375 241.8078
  FG-O 90.1519 114.9774 166.5357 195.1187 209.9151
  FG-V 97.1637 122.2427 175.0384 205.6517 220.5951
0.1 UD 105.4667 127.4527 178.2958 210.3946 229.2000
  FG-X 114.0739 136.1672 188.9056 221.1219 241.2009
  FG-O 90.3317 114.9383 167.1189 190.7122 209.3028
  FG-V 97.5556 122.2235 175.8912 200.6315 219.9939
0.3 UD 120.4439 126.9656 169.8070 188.2571 218.9324
  FG-X 130.6054 136.3973 181.1849 199.9691 230.5113
  FG-O 102.7080 112.4737 150.9616 174.3439 199.9412
  FG-V 111.1976 120.2882 160.6058 183.8592 210.3512
0.5 UD 144.3419 145.0951 220.7844 229.0503 231.6397
  FG-X 155.3892 156.2246 233.7825 242.7781 244.6759
  FG-O 129.1618 129.9906 196.1895 205.0887 209.8574
  FG-V 137.8894 138.7569 208.3156 208.3156 217.4388

Table 9: First five natural frequency parameters for square, FG-CNTRC, CFFF plates with a centric cutout. Geometrical characteristics of the plate are a/b = 1, h/a = 0.05 with various c/a ratios. The volume fraction of CNTs is set equal to [Graphic 54] = 0.17.

c/a Type [Graphic 55] [Graphic 56] [Graphic 57] [Graphic 58] [Graphic 59]
0.0 UD 22.7727 24.3214 40.0851 69.2495 83.6431
  FG-X 27.0842 28.4568 44.0066 69.7239 89.4504
  FG-O 16.7435 18.7782 36.1389 69.7239 79.6264
  FG-V 19.1381 21.0721 38.7339 69.6796 84.0389
0.1 UD 22.6504 24.2757 40.0027 68.9550 83.8138
  FG-X 26.9308 28.4058 43.8532 69.4269 89.3451
  FG-O 16.6641 18.7287 36.0570 69.4269 79.5320
  FG-V 19.0430 21.0212 38.6399 69.3808 83.9355
0.3 UD 20.4172 24.0224 37.9453 65.3384 81.1811
  FG-X 24.0635 28.1470 41.3325 65.7754 86.5017
  FG-O 15.2671 18.4600 34.5625 65.7754 76.7925
  FG-V 17.3638 20.7497 36.9148 65.6852 81.0431
0.5 UD 16.9516 23.0500 34.9990 55.9159 75.0937
  FG-X 19.6883 27.0578 38.2949 56.2537 79.9457
  FG-O 12.9576 17.6252 31.7571 56.2537 70.7251
  FG-V 14.6594 19.8497 33.9178 56.0921 74.7579

Table 10: First five natural frequency parameters for square, FG-CNTRC, SSSS plates with a centric cutout. Geometrical characteristics of the plate are a/b = 1, h/a = 0.05 with various c/a ratios. The volume fraction of CNTs is set equal to [Graphic 60] 0.17.

c/a Type [Graphic 61] [Graphic 62] [Graphic 63] [Graphic 64] [Graphic 65]
0.0 UD 63.2598 83.2741 132.0746 143.7036 143.7036
  FG-X 72.8708 92.2430 141.7590 144.7344 144.7344
  FG-O 49.4292 72.4990 123.2571 144.7344 144.7344
  FG-V 55.2524 78.2905 130.3768 144.7268 144.7268
0.1 UD 62.8020 83.1849 131.8828 144.8261 144.8261
  FG-X 72.4414 92.1454 141.5884 145.8609 145.8609
  FG-O 49.0286 72.4102 123.0916 145.8609 145.8609
  FG-V 54.8235 78.1925 130.2147 145.8510 145.8510
0.3 UD 52.8233 78.3506 111.6736 130.6302 154.9683
  FG-X 60.5716 87.1986 119.1929 139.3437 156.0783
  FG-O 41.9863 67.4468 100.7698 123.2779 156.0783
  FG-V 46.7420 73.0816 107.2829 129.9159 156.0612
0.5 UD 49.7695 72.2115 75.6430 110.4459 153.9671
  FG-X 56.2066 80.5715 80.8909 118.0424 165.6159
  FG-O 40.9160 31.2728 69.6564 103.1278 136.3056
  FG-V 45.0900 66.7584 73.9966 108.6995 146.1801

Table 11: First five natural frequency parameters for square, FG-CNTRC, CFCF plates with a centric cutout. Geometrical characteristics of the plate are a/b = 1, h/a = 0.05 with various c/a ratios. The volume fraction of CNTs is set equal to [Graphic 66] 0.17.

c/a Type [Graphic 67] [Graphic 68] [Graphic 69] [Graphic 70] [Graphic 71]
0.0 UD 100.1209 100.5478 106.0262 130.1245 142.0229
  FG-X 108.3648 108.7314 114.1163 138.8282 143.0241
  FG-O 84.7084 85.3698 92.0274 118.2125 143.0241
  FG-V 91.7731 92.3623 98.8950 125.5211 142.9107
0.1 UD 100.2534 100.3429 106.3842 129.9112 143.1875
  FG-X 108.5295 108.6060 114.7279 138.6133 144.1970
  FG-O 84.6851 85.1671 92.0179 117.9871 144.1970
  FG-V 91.8120 92.1557 99.0190 125.2861 144.0832
0.3 UD 100.7600 101.2200 118.8467 128.0103 153.1897
  FG-X 108.9985 109.4736 128.8350 137.2623 154.2720
  FG-O 85.4922 85.9562 101.4103 114.2352 151.0984
  FG-V 92.5250 93.0347 109.7041 121.8601 154.1448
0.5 UD 101.6312 101.6706 134.2600 134.9668 164.4286
  FG-X 109.8563 109.9006 144.0598 144.7920 165.5952
  FG-O 86.8830 86.5131 118.6095 119.3833 165.5945
  FG-V 93.5251 93.5551 126.8153 127.6207 165.3665

Table 12 presents the first five frequencies (including both in-plane and out-of-plane) of square plates made of FG-CNTRC with centric cutouts of various sizes. The side-to-thickness ratio is set equal to a/h = 20 and the plate is clamped all around. Numerical results are given for three different volume fractions of CNTs and four different graded patterns of CNTs. Similar to the case of plates without a cutout, an increase in the CNT volume fraction yields a higher natural frequency of the plate. The plates with an FG-X pattern of CNTs have higher frequencies in comparison to UD, FG-V and FG-O plates.

Table 12: First five natural frequency parameters for square, FG-CNTRC, CCCC plates with a centric cutout. The geometrical characteristics of the plate are a/b = 1, h/a = 0.05 and c/a = 0.5.

c/a [Graphic 72] Type [Graphic 73] [Graphic 74] [Graphic 75] [Graphic 76] [Graphic 77]
0.1 0.12 UD 83.9188 100.3679 139.1968 165.6225 180.1856
    FG-X 89.8427 105.9079 145.2992 172.7141 187.9588
    FG-O 72.7097 91.3377 131.5790 151.3920 165.3920
    FG-V 78.0171 96.2557 136.8848 158.4278 173.2206
  0.17 UD 105.4667 127.4527 178.2958 210.3946 229.2000
    FG-X 114.0739 136.1672 188.9056 221.1219 241.2009
    FG-O 90.3317 114.9383 167.1189 190.7122 209.3028
    FG-V 97.5556 122.2235 175.8912 200.6315 219.9939
  0.28 UD 117.9367 139.0787 190.6561 229.2992 249.0083
    FG-X 128.1334 152.0944 210.3997 243.4859 266.0974
    FG-O 103.9972 126.0241 176.2058 214.6312 232.7102
    FG-V 111.7471 135.8179 190.8244 224.2330 244.4012
0.3 0.12 UD 95.8721 100.3370 134.1470 147.7287 172.0447
    FG-X 102.8278 106.5212 141.7684 154.5267 179.4637
    FG-O 82.7712 89.7543 120.3341 137.5941 158.4212
    FG-V 89.0013 95.2007 127.2195 143.6480 165.5769
  0.17 UD 120.4439 126.9656 169.8070 188.2571 218.9324
    FG-X 130.6054 136.3973 181.1849 199.9691 230.5113
    FG-O 102.7080 112.4737 150.9616 174.3439 199.9412
    FG-V 111.1976 120.2882 160.6058 183.8592 210.3512
  0.28 UD 134.7884 139.7667 186.8796 202.9367 237.6707
    FG-X 147.0185 152.8559 201.8094 222.8837 254.4027
    FG-O 118.3189 125.0040 169.6503 186.3970 221.8681
    FG-V 127.5548 135.0123 180.5800 201.1201 233.5064
0.5 0.12 UD 114.3763 114.9769 174.3637 180.8571 182.4758
    FG-X 121.0992 121.7038 182.9347 189.6084 190.7261
    FG-O 102.9381 103.5831 156.5728 163.3712 166.6608
    FG-V 108.9502 109.6062 165.2573 172.0949 174.7810
  0.17 UD 144.3419 145.0951 220.7844 229.0503 231.6397
    FG-X 155.3892 156.2246 233.7825 242.7781 244.6759
    FG-O 129.1618 129.9906 196.1895 205.0887 209.8574
    FG-V 137.8894 138.7569 208.3156 208.3156 217.4388
  0.28 UD 158.9989 159.7737 242.3844 251.0307 252.5998
    FG-X 173.8958 174.8389 258.3101 268.3936 270.2030
    FG-O 143.1568 143.9204 223.0877 231.1761 234.5069
    FG-V 154.2322 155.1098 234.8549 244.0462 247.0420

Conclusion

The natural frequencies of carbon-nanotube-reinforced, composite laminated plates with a rectangular hole in the center was analyzed in this research. The properties of the plate were obtained according to a modified rule of mixtures, which includes the efficiency parameters to account for the size-dependent characteristics of the nanocomposite. The distribution of CNTs across the plate thickness was both uniform or functionally graded. An energy-based Ritz formulation was constructed to obtain the frequencies of the plate. The basis shape functions were obtained using the Chebyshev polynomials, suitable for arbitrary in-plane and out-of-plane boundary conditions on the exterior and the cutout is assumed to be free. After performing comparison studies for isotropic and unidirectional plates with a centric cutout, the parametric studies were given for plates both with and without a cutout. It is shown that, similar to FG-CNTRC plates without a cutout, increasing the CNT volume fraction results in higher frequencies of the plate with a cutout. Furthermore, FG-X plates have a higher natural frequency in comparison to the other three patterns of CNTs. It was also demonstrated that the variation of fundamental frequency of a perforated plate with respect to the hole size is not monotonic and is dependent on the boundary conditions.

References

  1. Kwon, H.; Bradbury, C. R.; Leparoux, M. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2011, 13, 325–329. doi:10.1002/adem.201000251
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Liew, K. M.; Lei, Z. X.; Zhang, L. W. Compos. Struct. 2015, 120, 90–97. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.041
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Shen, H.-S. Compos. Struct. 2009, 91, 9–19. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.026
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  4. Zhu, P.; Lei, Z. X.; Liew, K. M. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 1450–1460. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.11.010
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
  5. Zhang, L. W.; Lei, Z. X.; Liew, K. M. Compos. Struct. 2015, 122, 172–183. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.070
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  6. Zhang, L. W.; Lei, Z. X.; Liew, K. M. Compos. Struct. 2015, 120, 189–199. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.009
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  7. Zhang, L. W.; Lei, Z. X.; Liew, K. M.; Yu, J. L. Compos. Struct. 2014, 111, 205–212. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.035
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  8. Zhang, L. W.; Lei, Z. X.; Liew, K. M. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 256, 488–504. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2015.01.066
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Lei, Z. X.; Zhang, L. W.; Liew, K. M. Compos. Struct. 2015, 127, 245–259. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.019
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Malekzadeh, P.; Zarei, A. R. Thin-Walled Struct. 2014, 82, 221–232. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2014.04.016
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Malekzadeh, P.; Heydarpour, Y. Meccanica 2015, 50, 143–167. doi:10.1007/s11012-014-0061-4
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Natarajan, S.; Haboussi, M.; Manickam, G. Compos. Struct. 2014, 113, 197–207. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.03.007
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Wang, Z.-X.; Shen, H.-S. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2011, 50, 2319–2330. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.03.005
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  14. Wang, Z.-X.; Shen, H.-S. Composites, Part B 2012, 43, 411–421. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.040
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  15. Wang, Z.-X.; Shen, H.-S. Nonlinear Dyn. 2012, 70, 735–754. doi:10.1007/s11071-012-0491-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Lei, Z. X.; Zhang, L. W.; Liew, K. M. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2015, 99, 208–217. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.05.014
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Lei, Z. X.; Zhang, L. W.; Liew, K. M.; Yu, J. M. Compos. Struct. 2014, 113, 328–338. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.03.035
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Zhang, L. W.; Song, Z. G.; Liew, K. M. Compos. Struct. 2015, 134, 989–1003. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.138
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Zhang, L. W.; Liew, K. M. Compos. Struct. 2015, 132, 974–983. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.017
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Zhang, L. W.; Song, Z. G.; Liew, K. M. Compos. Struct. 2015, 128, 165–175. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.011
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Zhang, L. W.; Cui, W. C.; Liew, K. M. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2015, 103, 9–21. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.08.021
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Zhang, L. W.; Liew, K. M. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2015, 295, 219–239. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2015.07.006
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Zhang, L. W.; Lei, Z. X.; Liew, K. M. Composites, Part B 2015, 75, 36–46. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.033
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Lei, Z. X.; Zhang, L. W.; Liew, K. M. Composites, Part B 2016, 84, 211–221. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.081
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Zhang, L. W.; Liew, K. M.; Reddy, J. N. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2016, 298, 1–28. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2015.09.016
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Shi, D.-L.; Feng, X.-Q.; Huang, Y. Y.; Hwang, K.-C.; Gao, H. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2004, 126, 250–257. doi:10.1115/1.1751182
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Fidelus, J. D.; Wiesel, E.; Gojny, F. H.; Schulte, K.; Wagner, H. D. Composites, Part A 2005, 36, 1555–1561. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.006
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Shen, H.-S. Compos. Struct. 2011, 93, 2096–2108. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.02.011
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  29. Jam, J. E.; Kiani, Y. Compos. Struct. 2015, 125, 586–595. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.052
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  30. Jam, J. E.; Kiani, Y. Compos. Struct. 2015, 132, 35–43. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.045
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  31. Mirzaei, M.; Kiani, Y. Compos. Struct. 2015, 134, 1004–1013. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.003
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  32. Mirzaei, M.; Kiani, Y. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2015, 47, 42–53. doi:10.1016/j.ast.2015.09.011
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  33. Mirzaei, M.; Kiani, Y. Compos. Struct. 2016, 142, 45–56. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.071
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Mirzaei, M.; Kiani, Y. Meccanica 2016, 1–17. doi:10.1007/s11012-015-0348-0
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Reddy, J. N. Mechanics of Laminated Composite Plates and Shells, Theory and Application; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, U.S.A., 2003.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  36. Zhang, L. W.; Zhu, P.; Liew, K. M. Compos. Struct. 2014, 108, 472–492. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.043
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Zhu, P.; Zhang, L. W.; Liew, K. M. Compos. Struct. 2014, 107, 298–314. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.08.001
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Zhang, L. W.; Li, D. M.; Liew, K. M. Eng. Anal. Boundary Elem. 2015, 54, 39–46. doi:10.1016/j.enganabound.2015.01.007
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Zhang, L. W.; Huang, D.; Liew, K. M. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2015, 297, 116–139. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2015.08.018
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Shen, H.-S.; Xiang, Y. Eng. Struct. 2013, 56, 698–708. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.06.002
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Han, Y.; Elliott, J. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2007, 39, 315–323. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2006.06.011
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  42. Wang, C. Y.; Zhang, L. C. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 075705. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/19/7/075705
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  43. Liew, K. M.; Kitipornchai, S.; Leung, A. Y. T.; Lim, C. W. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2003, 45, 941–959. doi:10.1016/S0020-7403(03)00109-7
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
  44. Lam, K. Y.; Hung, K. C.; Chow, S. T. Appl. Acoustics 1989, 28, 49–60. doi:10.1016/0003-682X(89)90030-3
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  45. Malekzadeh, P.; Bahranifard, F.; Ziaee, S. Compos. Struct. 2013, 105, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.005
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
  46. Mundkur, G.; Bhat, R. B.; Neriya, S. J. Sound Vib. 1994, 176, 136–144. doi:10.1006/jsvi.1994.1364
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
  47. Aksu, G.; Ali, R. J. Sound Vib. 1976, 44, 147–158. doi:10.1016/0022-460X(76)90713-6
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  48. Reddy, J. N. J. Sound Vib. 1982, 83, 1–10. doi:10.1016/S0022-460X(82)80071-0
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  49. Ovesy, H. R.; Fazilati, J. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 1250–1258. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.11.009
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities