Fabrication of Ag-modified hollow titania spheres via controlled silver diffusion in Ag–TiO2 core–shell nanostructures

  1. Bartosz BartosewiczORCID Logo,
  2. Malwina LiszewskaORCID Logo,
  3. Bogusław BudnerORCID Logo,
  4. Marta Michalska-DomańskaORCID Logo,
  5. Krzysztof KopczyńskiORCID Logo and
  6. Bartłomiej J. JankiewiczORCID Logo

Institute of Optoelectronics, Military University of Technology, gen. S. Kaliskiego 2, Warsaw 00-908, Poland

  1. Corresponding author email

Associate Editor: S. Giordani
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2020, 11, 141–146. doi:10.3762/bjnano.11.12
Received 26 Jul 2019, Accepted 06 Jan 2020, Published 10 Jan 2020

Abstract

Inorganic hollow spheres find a growing number of applications in many fields, including catalysis and solar cells. Hence, a simple fabrication method with a low number of simple steps is desired, which would allow for good control over the structural features and physicochemical properties of titania hollow spheres modified with noble metal nanoparticles. A simple method employing sol–gel coating of nanoparticles with titania followed by controlled silver diffusion was developed and applied for the synthesis of Ag-modified hollow TiO2 spheres. The morphology of the synthesized structures and their chemical composition was investigated using SEM and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, respectively. The optical properties of the synthesized structures were characterized using UV–vis spectroscopy. Ag–TiO2 hollow nanostructures with different optical properties were prepared simply by a change of the annealing time in the last fabrication step. The synthesized nanostructures exhibit a broadband optical absorption in the UV–vis range.

Keywords: core–shell nanostructures; hollow spheres; silver diffusion; silver-modified titanium dioxide; titania

Findings

In recent years, nanometer- to micrometer-sized inorganic hollow spheres (HSs) have received increasing attention due to their potential application in a variety of areas [1-4] such as solar energy conversion or photocatalysis [2,5-7]. Among them, of great interest are TiO2 HSs modified with plasmonic nanoparticles (NPs), which allow for the combination of the photocatalytic properties of TiO2 and the optical properties of plasmonic NPs [2]. This combination has been shown to extent the photocatalytic activity of TiO2, which is initially limited to UV light [8], to the visible or even to the NIR range of radiation [9].

Recent examples of the fabrication of plasmonic NP-modified TiO2 HSs are based mainly on multistep processes including hard-templating methods [10-19]. Au-modified TiO2 HSs of regular shape were prepared using a multistep process in which sulfonated polystyrene spheres were used as a hard-template [10]. The obtained composite catalyst exhibits a synergistic effect between the anatase crystalline shell and the AuNPs as well as superb thermal and mechanical stability of the highly dispersed AuNPs. TiO2 HSs decorated with ultrasmall Ag nanocrystallites and exhibiting excellent photocatalytic properties were fabricated in a multistep process including a two-step hydrothermal treatment [11]. Ag-modified TiO2 HSs showing efficient photocatalysis in the visible-light range were synthesized in a multistep process through a sacrificial core technique using AgBr as the core [12]. A hard-templating method with a silica template was used in the fabrication of rattle-type HSs of Au@TiO2 using multistep template deposition and a surface-protected etching method [13], of TiO2 HSs of mixed anatase/rutile composition loaded with noble metal NPs (Au, Pt, Pd) [14], and of N-doped Ag/TiO2 HSs [15]. A hard-templating method with a carbon template was used in a one-pot synthesis of uniform TiO2–Ag hybrid HSs [16], and of Ag/AgCl modified self-doped TiO2 HSs [17]. Finally, polymer spheres were used as hard-templates in a multistep fabrication of tri-modified TiO2 HSs (Ag–C/N–TiO2) [18], and of silver/TiO2 HSs [19].

Many papers dedicated to fabrication and application of plasmonic NP-modified TiO2 HSs have been published, including those mentioned above. In most cases the methodologies used are either complex or allow only for a limited control of the nanostructure morphologies and the resulting properties. In addition, we are not aware of any articles reporting the possibility to control the optical properties of plasmonic NP-modified TiO2 HSs by means of changes in their morphologies. In this work, we present the results of studies on the fabrication of Ag-modified TiO2 HSs with broadband optical absorption through controlled silver diffusion in Ag–TiO2 core–shell nanostructures (CSNs). Our approach comprises three simple steps starting from the synthesis of the metallic core, through its coating with titania and finally annealing leading to plasmonic hollow nanostructures with plasmon resonance in a broad spectral range. SEM microscopy was used to visualize changes occurring in the morphology of the nanostructures. XPS spectroscopy was used to provide information regarding the chemical composition of Ag-modified TiO2 HSs.

Figure 1 shows a schematic illustration of the formation of Ag-modified TiO2 HSs from Ag@TiO2 CSNs together with SEM images of the structures at different stages of their fabrication. We have demonstrated recently that AgNPs can be covered in a controlled manner with a smooth titania shell of variable thickness by the hydrolysis of organic titania precursors to form Ag@TiO2 CSNs [20]. Examples of such structures are shown in Figure 1 (down left) and in Figure 2A. Interestingly, further thermal modification of these fabricated Ag@TiO2 CSNs yields unexpected results. Annealing of Ag@TiO2 nanostructures in a muffle furnace results in Ag diffusion from the silver core into the titania shell. As a result, the gradual diminishment of the silver core (DP50 = 113 nm) and the formation of much smaller Ag particles (diameter below 10 nm) on the titania shell surface are observed. The metal diffusion into the titania shell has not been observed in the case of Au@TiO2 CSNs fabricated using the same method as Ag@TiO2 CSNs. This is likely due to much lower reactivity of Au compared to Ag. Ag–TiO2 nanostructures at an intermediate and the final stage of thermal modification are shown in SEM images in Figure 1 and Figure 2B–E.

[2190-4286-11-12-1]

Figure 1: Formation of Ag-modified TiO2 HSs (top) and SEM images showing Ag–TiO2 nanostructures at different stages of their fabrication (bottom, scale bar = 200 nm).

[2190-4286-11-12-2]

Figure 2: SEM images of freshly prepared Ag–TiO2 core–shell nanostructures (A) and Ag–TiO2 core–shell nanostructures after annealing at 150 °C for 0.5 h (B), 1.5 h (C), 3 h (D), and 12 h (E).

The SEM images in Figure 1 clearly indicate the titania shell, the Ag core and products of its thermal transformation, i.e., disappearing Ag cores and newly formed Ag nanoparticles. In the first image (Figure 1, bottom left) the Ag core is clearly visible as a bright circle. Upon thermal transformation, the Ag core becomes smaller and, depending on the initial CSNs and the annealing time, it will take on different shapes (Figure 1, bottom centre). It must be stated here that transformation does not occur identically in all CSNs in the given samples, as can be seen in Figure 2, and resulting optical properties will be a sum of the properties of all particles in the sample. If CSNs are annealed for a sufficiently long time the Ag–TiO2 nanostructures shown in Figure 1 (bottom right) and Figure 2E are formed. These nanostructures are empty inside as indicated by a darker region of low average atomic number in the middle of the particles. They also have a high number of small AgNPs (much smaller than the size of the initial Ag core, below 10 nm) present on the surface of the titania shell.

The process of formation of Ag-modified TiO2 HSs can be controlled simply by the annealing time, and as a result, nanostructures of different morphologies can be obtained (Figure 2). At shorter annealing times (Figure 2B–D) the diffusion in Ag–TiO2 CSNs does not occur at the same speed. This is indicated by the presence of Ag–TiO2 nanostructures with cores at different stages of size reduction, including nanostructures with intact cores (Figure 2B–D). However, after longer annealing times in all Ag–TiO2 CSNs, silver cores were fully converted to Ag species (i.e., positively charged Ag clusters as discussed below or other subnanometric silver species) embedded in a titania shell or smaller AgNPs located at the shell surface (Figure 2 E).

To the best of our knowledge, the silver diffusion in TiO2 nanostructures has been only investigated in the case of TiO2 thin films [8,21-24] and our studies are probably the first to discuss this process occurring in Ag@TiO2 CSNs. Based on our results and the diffusion mechanism proposed for AgNPs on titania films [8,21], the silver diffusion in Ag@TiO2 CSNs can occur in the following manner. Titania is oxidized in an air atmosphere and as a result, holes, which may further oxidize AgNPs surrounded by the titania shell, are generated. Upon oxidation, AgNPs gain a positive electric charge and may eject positively charged Ag clusters. In case of Ag@TiO2 CSNs and depending on the annealing time, these ejected Ag clusters may either be accommodated within or on the titania shell. In the titania shell, these silver clusters could react with the TiO2 host through the formation of a complex [Ag–(TiO2)] [21]. Upon reaching the surface of the titania shell positively charged silver species could also form AgNPs much smaller than the core of the initial Ag@TiO2 CSNs. These small AgNPs are responsible for the observed optical properties of Ag-modified TiO2 HSs. The proposed mechanism of silver diffusion and especially the importance of oxygen molecules are supported by the fact that when freshly prepared Ag@TiO2 CSNs are placed in the XPS spectrometer and annealed under vacuum, without the presence of oxygen, no silver diffusion is observed.

The analysis of the Ag 3d band shows that silver is present in Ag-modified TiO2 HSs in at least three different forms, i.e., Ag metal, oxides (AgO/Ag2O) and probably in the form of alloys (Figure 3). This observation suggests that silver is present in fabricated nanostructures not only in the form of AgNPs on the surface of the hollow TiO2 spheres, but is also embedded in the other forms within the TiO2 HSs. The position and shape of the peaks of metallic silver were determined based on measurements of a silver plate with a purity of 99.97%. The half-width of the Ag 3d5/2 peak of metallic Ag is approximately 0.95 eV and its maximum lies at 386.08 eV, which is consistent with the data in the literature [25]. The peak associated with silver oxide appears at lower binding energies than the peak of metallic silver [26,27]. Due to the very small offset for different forms of silver oxide, only one peak located between 367.27 and 367.58 eV with a half-width of 1.03–1.07 eV was modeled in the spectra. The third peak with a maximum between 358.66 and 358.78 eV and a half width of 1.36–1.40 eV was assigned to a silver alloy with titanium. Its location cannot be linked to any oxidation state of silver. Such a shift of the Ag 3d5/2 peak can only come from alloys of silver with metals of lower electronegativity [28]. Wang and collaborators obtained this effect for an Ag/Al alloy in which Ag and Al have electronegativity values of 1.93 and 1.61, respectively [28]. We believe that a similar situation occurs in the case of Ag–TiO2 nanostructures due to the electronegativity of Ti (1.54) being lower than the electronegativity of Ag.

[2190-4286-11-12-3]

Figure 3: XPS Ag 3d1/2 and Ag 3d5/2 spectra of freshly prepared Ag–TiO2 core–shell structures (top) and after annealing at 150 °C for 12 h (bottom).

The UV–vis spectra of aqueous suspensions of freshly prepared Ag@TiO2 CSNs (Figure 4A) and nanostructures resulting from their annealing at 150 °C for 0.5 h (Figure 4B), 1.5 h (Figure 4C), 3 h (Figure 4D) and 12 h (Figure 4E) are shown in Figure 4. To better visualize the optical properties of the fabricated CSNs and Ag-modified hollow TiO2 nanostructures, images of their aqueous suspensions are also shown in the inset of Figure 4. As we have shown previously, coating of AgNPs with TiO2 leads to an overall increase in the refractive index of their local dielectric environment and, as a result, to a red-shift of the plasmon resonance [20]. As can be seen from curve A in Figure 4, Ag@TiO2 CSNs have a broad absorption in the UV–vis range. This is the characteristic absorption of these composites, which does not change remarkably with a change of the shell thickness. The annealing of Ag@TiO2 CSNs leads to nanostructures with significantly changed optical properties as can be seen from curves B–E in Figure 4. In all cases, a red-shift of the maximum of absorption and a strengthening and widening of the plasmon resonance bands were observed. It is significant that the Ag-modified TiO2 hollow nanostructures show a broad and relatively strong absorption in the whole investigated spectral range, which corresponds to over 60% of the energy in the solar energy distribution [29].

[2190-4286-11-12-4]

Figure 4: UV–vis spectra and images of aqueous suspensions of freshly prepared Ag–TiO2 core–shell nanostructures (A) and after annealing in 150 °C for 0.5 h (B), 1.5 h (C), 3 h (D) and 12 h (E).

The changes observed in the optical properties of the Ag-modified TiO2 HSs compared to Ag@TiO2 CSNs are related to several changes occurring in the nanostructure morphology. Any interactions affecting the optical properties of these CSNs occurred only between a single silver core and the titania shell. Based on the proposed mechanism, the annealing gradually led to a transformation of the single and relatively large core (DP50 = 113 nm) into multiple and tiny silver clusters, which with increasing annealing time were moving through the titania shell toward its edge and were finally forming AgNPs of different size. Therefore, the resulting optical properties represent the sum of the change of number, size and shape of the AgNPs, their local environment (in the final structure many small AgNPs are located on the interface between TiO2 and water), and the plasmon–plasmon coupling between the AgNPs on the titania shell [21].

In summary, we have shown herein a simple and template-free approach to the fabrication of Ag-modified hollow TiO2 spheres via controlled silver diffusion in Ag–TiO2 CSNs. Ag–TiO2 CSNs of different shell thicknesses, which are fabricated via a previously developed method, can be further modified by annealing to form Ag-modified hollow TiO2 spheres with different morphologies. Hollow nanostructures with a variable amount of AgNPs on the shell surface and with different optical properties resulting from the structural differences can be fabricated simply by control of the annealing time. Fabricated Ag-TiO2 hollow nanostructures exhibit a broader and larger optical absorption in the UV–vis range than the Ag–TiO2 CSNs they are made from. In addition, a significant number of AgNPs can be observed on their surface and, therefore, based on the existing literature, these nanostructures should be of great interest for applications in solar light-driven photocatalysis and photovoltaics [30].

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Materials and methods.
Format: PDF Size: 95.2 KB Download

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Polish National Science Centre [Grant no. 2011/03/D/ST5/06038].

References

  1. Wang, X.; Feng, J.; Bai, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Yin, Y. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 10983–11060. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00731
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Liu, X.; Iocozzia, J.; Wang, Y.; Cui, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, S.; Li, Z.; Lin, Z. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 402–434. doi:10.1039/c6ee02265k
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  3. Pérez-Lorenzo, M.; Vaz, B.; Salgueiriño, V.; Correa-Duarte, M. A. Chem. – Eur. J. 2013, 19, 12196–12211. doi:10.1002/chem.201301802
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Lee, J.; Kim, S. M.; Lee, I. S. Nano Today 2014, 9, 631–667. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2014.09.003
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Zhang, C.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Fang, J.; Sheng, X. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 32, e4160. doi:10.1002/aoc.4160
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Li, Y.-Y.; Wang, J.-G.; Liu, X.-R.; Shen, C.; Xie, K.; Wei, B. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 31691–31698. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b04624
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Xiang, Q.; Yu, J.; Cheng, B.; Ong, H. C. Chem. – Asian J. 2010, 5, 1466–1474. doi:10.1002/asia.200900695
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Zuo, J.; Keil, P.; Grundmeier, G. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 7231–7237. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.04.054
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  9. Linic, S.; Christopher, P.; Ingram, D. B. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 911–921. doi:10.1038/nmat3151
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Yu, Y.; Cao, C. Y.; Chen, Z.; Liu, H.; Li, P.; Dou, Z. F.; Song, W. G. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 3116. doi:10.1039/c3cc39212k
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  11. Li, Q.; Zhang, C.; Ma, J.; Wang, G.; Ng, D. H. L. ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 1392–1400. doi:10.1002/cctc.201300994
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  12. Boxi, S. S.; Paria, S. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 37657–37668. doi:10.1039/c5ra03421c
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  13. Kong, L.; Duan, G.; Zuo, G.; Cai, W.; Cheng, Z. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2010, 123, 421–426. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.04.034
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  14. Zheng, H.; Svengren, H.; Huang, Z.; Yang, Z.; Zou, X.; Johnsson, M. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 264, 147–150. doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.01.012
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  15. Lu, J.; Su, F.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Y.; Ma, X.; Gong, J. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 720–724. doi:10.1039/c2ra22713d
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  16. Wang, S.; Qian, H.; Hu, Y.; Dai, W.; Zhong, Y.; Chen, J.; Hu, X. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 1122–1128. doi:10.1039/c2dt32040a
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  17. Yin, H.; Wang, X.; Wang, L.; Nie, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, Q.; Wu, W. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 657, 44–52. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.10.055
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  18. Yin, Z.; Qiu, S.; Chen, W.; Li, H.; Cheng, L.; Cao, S. Mater. Lett. 2018, 214, 202–204. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2017.11.123
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  19. Song, C.; Wang, D.; Gu, G.; Lin, Y.; Yang, J.; Chen, L.; Fu, X.; Hu, Z. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 272, 340–344. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2003.08.062
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  20. Bartosewicz, B.; Michalska-Domańska, M.; Liszewska, M.; Zasada, D.; Jankiewicz, B. J. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 2083–2093. doi:10.3762/bjnano.8.208
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  21. Zilberberg, L.; Mitlin, S.; Shankar, H.; Asscher, M. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 28979–28991. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b09621
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  22. Liu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Sun, Y.; Liang, W. Mater. Res. Bull. 2018, 98, 240–249. doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.10.027
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Kulczyk-Malecka, J.; Kelly, P. J.; West, G.; Clarke, G. C. B.; Ridealgh, J. A.; Almtoft, K. P.; Greer, A. L.; Barber, Z. H. Acta Mater. 2014, 66, 396–404. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.030
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. García-Serrano, J.; Gómez-Hernández, E.; Ocampo-Fernández, M.; Pal, U. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2009, 9, 1097–1105. doi:10.1016/j.cap.2008.12.008
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Zhang, H.; Liang, C.; Liu, J.; Tian, Z.; Wang, G.; Cai, W. Langmuir 2012, 28, 3938–3944. doi:10.1021/la2043526
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Graf, M.; Haensch, M.; Carstens, J.; Wittstock, G.; Weissmüller, J. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 17839–17848. doi:10.1039/c7nr05124g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Reference Pages - Atom. http://www.xpsfitting.com/search/label/Silver (accessed Jan 2, 2020).
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Wang, C.; Yu, J.; Hu, M.-y.; Zhang, K.-h. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 747, 966–971. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.098
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  29. Ghosh, A.; Norton, B. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 163, 178–184. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2017.01.036
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Clavero, C. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 95–103. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.238
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2020 Bartosewicz et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular requires that the authors and source are credited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjnano)

 
Back to Article List