- Full Research Paper
- Published 10 Dec 2018
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Current I (black) and corresponding strain ε (red) as functions of the applied potential U during a...
-
![]()
Figure 2: Strain ε as a function of the time t for a series of consecutive hydrogen absorption/desorption pro...
-
![]()
Figure 3: Enlarged view of Figure 2: Strain ε as a function of time t for electrochemical hydrogen absorption in nano...
-
![]()
Figure 4: Atomic ratio of hydrogen and palladium cf (H:Pd) plotted as function of the polarisation potential U...
-
![]()
Figure 5: Strain ε as a function of the time t for a series of consecutive hydrogen absorption processes at a...
-
![]()
Figure 6: Current I as a function of the applied potential U during a single voltammetric cycle for nanoporou...
-
![]()
Figure 7: Strain ε as a function of the time t for constant-current/constant-potential (2 mA – green, −1 V – ...
-
![]()
Figure 8: Schematic representation of the plasticity evolution during hydrogen desorption from nanoporous pal...
-
- Full Research Paper
- Published 07 Dec 2018
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Interphase detection, approach 1: schematic representation of the samples to be compared, and metho...
-
![]()
Figure 2: Approach 1 (PS + 100 nm Al2O3 and PS + 100 nm Al2O3 + PVAc samples): (a) average topography profile...
-
![]()
Figure 3: Interphase detection, approach 2: schematic representation of the samples to be compared, and metho...
-
![]()
Figure 4: Approach 2: EFM images of PS + 50nmSiO2 (upper) and PS + 100 nm Al2O3 + 50 nm SiO2 (middle panel) s...
-
![]()
Figure 5: The three steps of approach 3: compared samples and methodologies.
-
![]()
Figure 6: Tip calibration using the signal vs z curve. Experimental data fit simulations (tip radius of 29 nm...
-
![]()
Figure 7: PS calibration – average cross-sectional profiles measured using a typical reference PS sample. (a)...
-
![]()
Figure 8: Approach 3 (step A) PS + 100 nm Al2O3 and PS + 100 nm SiO2 samples: (a) Average topography profiles...
-
![]()
Figure 9: Approach 3 (step B) PS + 50 nm Al2O3 + 50 nm SiO2 and PS + 100 nm SiO2 samples: (a) Average topogra...
-
![]()
Figure 10: Approach 3 - Step C (PS + 50 nm SiO2 + 50 nm Al2O3 and PS + 100 nm Al2O3 samples). a) Average topog...
-
![]()
Figure 11: Typical simulation of the electric field map obtained with a 2D axisymmetric model of the EFM tip a...
-
- Full Research Paper
- Published 06 Dec 2018
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Synthesis of the CMs by covalent assembly of CAs: valence-endowed nanoparticles and nanospheres. (1...
-
![]()
Figure 2: a) Silica surface modification with carboxylic acid groups, (b) zeta potential as a function of pH ...
-
![]()
Figure 3: Top: TEM images of the CMs obtained from mixing particles with 4 aminated dimples with 100 nm silic...
-
![]()
Figure 4: TEM images of the CMs obtained from mixing particles with four aminated dimples with 100 nm silica ...
-
- Full Research Paper
- Published 05 Dec 2018
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Molecular structures of Irganox 1425 (MP-Ca) and hindered amine light stabilizer (HALS).
-
![]()
Figure 2: Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of different HnMn′-Ca2Al-LDH samples.
-
![]()
Figure 3: FTIR spectra of different HnMn′-Ca2Al-LDH samples.
-
![]()
Figure 4: SEM images of (a) HALS-Ca2Al, (b) MP-Ca2Al and (c) H2M1-Ca2Al, (d) H1M1-Ca2Al, (e) H1M2-Ca2Al, (f) H...
-
![]()
Figure 5: (a) TG and (b) DTA curves of Ca2Al-LDHs: HALS-Ca2Al, MP-Ca2Al, H2M1-Ca2Al, H1M1-Ca2Al, H1M2-Ca2Al, ...
-
![]()
Figure 6: Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of HnMn′-Ca2Al/PP composites. LDH reflection peaks were marked wit...
-
![]()
Figure 7: (a) FTIR spectra and (b) visible-light transmittance spectra of Ca2Al/PP composites. (c) SEM image ...
-
![]()
Figure 8: (a) TGA curves of HnMn′-Ca2Al/PP composites. (b) FTIR spectra of PP after different periods of ther...
-
- Full Research Paper
- Published 03 Dec 2018
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Phase contrast MFM images of engineered parallel-stripe domains. Magnetic domains with antiparallel...
-
![]()
Figure 2: XMCD signal images of engineered parallel domain stripes. Magnetic domains with antiparallel magnet...
-
![]()
Figure 3: Phase contrast MFM signal of domains with stepwise decreased nominal widths and hh and tt magnetiza...
-
![]()
Figure 4: Two-dimensional engineered magnetic domain patterns. (a–d) Phase contrast MFM images in 80 nm heigh...
-
![]()
Figure 5: Simulated distribution of the energy transfer by ionization per ion. The positions of layer borders...
-
![]()
Figure 6: Definition of
![[Graphic 63]](/bjnano/content/inline/2190-4286-9-276-i63.svg?max-width=637&scale=1.18182)
. ![[Graphic 64]](/bjnano/content/inline/2190-4286-9-276-i64.svg?max-width=637&scale=1.18182)
is the angle between the domain wall (DW) normal vector ![[Graphic 65]](/bjnano/content/inline/2190-4286-9-276-i65.svg?max-width=637&scale=1.18182)
and the local unidirectio...
-
- Full Research Paper
- Published 30 Nov 2018
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Structure of ICR-2 viewed along the c axis (left) and the structure of the modifying porphyrins (ri...
-
![]()
Figure 2: Particle size distributions of nanoICR-2 (left) and nanoICR-2/TPPPi(Ph) (right).
-
![]()
Figure 3: TEM images of parent nanoICR-2 (left) and nanoICR-2/TPPPi(Ph) (right). The scale bars represent 50 ...
-
![]()
Figure 4: Powder XRD patterns of microcrystalline ICR-2 (bottom line), nanoICR-2 (middle line) and nanoICR-2/...
-
![]()
Figure 5: Normalized UV–vis spectra of nanoICR-2 (blue), TPPPi(Ph) (black), and nanoICR-2/TPPPi(Ph) (red) in ...
-
![]()
Figure 6: (A) Comparison of the cellular uptake of different types of nanoICR-2 with porphyrin concentration ...
-
![]()
Figure 7: Confocal microscopy of HeLa cells incubated with 2 µM nanoICR-2/TPPPi(Ph) for 24 h: LysoTracker Gre...
-
![]()
Figure 8: Relative viability of HeLa cells incubated for 4 h with specified concentrations of nanoICR-2/porph...
-
-
Supp. Info
- Full Research Paper
- Published 28 Nov 2018
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Simultaneous STM/AFM images of a graphene surface on a Cu substrate. (a) STM topography in constant...
-
![]()
Figure 2: F–d spectroscopy; force (F) and tunnel current (It) were measured as functions of the relative tip–...
-
![]()
Figure 3: Simultaneous STM/AFM images of a graphene surface. (a) STM topography in constant-current mode (for...
-
- Letter
- Published 27 Nov 2018
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Au@alendronate NPs characterization: (a) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image (left) and si...
-
![]()
Figure 2: (a) Temperature increase and corresponding typical IR image and (b) SAR (W/g) as a function of the ...
-
![]()
Figure 3: Metabolic activity of PC3 cells incubated (a) with free alendronate (black curve) and Au@alendronat...
-
-
Supp. Info
- Full Research Paper
- Published 26 Nov 2018
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Schematic representation of (a) graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide structures, (b) polaron a...
-
![]()
Figure 2: AFM images of rGO-25 sample, and rGO/PANI and rGO/PANI/hexNb nanocomposites at different scan sizes...
-
![]()
Figure 3: AFM images of rGO/PANI/hexNb nanocomposite at 3 μm scan size.
-
![]()
Figure 4: XPS spectra at the C 1s core level of GO and rGO samples prepared by reactions at 25 °C for 7 days ...
-
![]()
Figure 5: XPS spectra at N 1s core level of PANI and nanocomposites rGO/PANI and rGO/PANI/hexNb.
-
![]()
Figure 6: (a) Raman spectra (λ0 = 632.8 nm) of PANI, rGO/PANI and rGO/PANI/hexNb in the range of 1050–1750 cm...
-
![]()
Figure 7: CV curves of PANI, rGO, rGO/PANI , PANI/hexNb and rGO/PANI/hexNb at 25 mV·s−1 scan rate. Electrolyt...
-
-
Supp. Info
- Full Research Paper
- Published 23 Nov 2018
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: AFM images (a, c) and optical image (b) of the tip side of an Olympus OMCL-HA-100 AFM cantilever. I...
-
![]()
Figure 2: Topography (a), error signal (b), capacity data (c) and contact potential (e) acquired on the flat ...
-
![]()
Figure 3: Topography images and spectroscopy data at specific locations on three different Pt-coated cantilev...
-
