Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2022, 13, 882–895. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.13.79
Figure S1: The nitrogen adsorption and desorption curves of the samples with different Fe/Ni synthesis ratios at pH 0. Figure S2: Pore size distribution of the samples with different Fe/Ni synthesis ratios. Figure S3: The FESEM images of LaFexNi1−xO3 prepared at pH 7 (at the magnification of 100,000×). Figure S4: (a) The C/C0 and (b) the 1st order kinetic analysis of the photodegradation using LaFe0.7Ni0.3O3 operating at different controlling conditions. Figure S5: (a) The C/C0 and (b) 1st order kinetic analysis of the MB and TC photodegradation using LaFe0.7Ni0.3O3 operating at the optimal condition. Table S1: The specific surface area, pore size, and pore volume for the samples with different Fe/Ni ratios. Table S2: The unit cell parameters and cell volume for the samples with different Fe/Ni ratios. Table S3: The detailed EDS information of various samples with different Fe/Ni ratios. Table S4: The comparison of photodegradation performance over various LaFeO3-related samples.
Supporting Information File 1: Additional figures and tables. | ||
Format: PDF | Size: 626.4 KB | Download |
Article Citation | |
Download RIS (Reference Manager) | Download BIB (BIBTEX) |
Cited References | |
Download RIS (Reference Manager) | Download BIB (BIBTEX) |
Picture with graphical abstract, title and authors for social media postings and presentations.
Format: PNG | Size: 11.3 MB | Download |
Viet Van Pham and Wee-Jun Ong