3 article(s) from Šlouf, Miroslav
Figure 1: Transmission electron micrographs micrographs of (A) PLL-γ-Fe2O3 and (B) nanomag®-D-spio nanopartic...
Figure 2: PLL-γ-Fe2O3 and nanomag®-D-spio nanoparticles labeling of NSCs. Light microscopy after Prussian Blu...
Figure 3: Quantitative analysis of NSC labeling of PLL-γ-Fe2O3 and nanomag®-D-spio nanoparticles. Overtone cu...
Figure 4: PLL-γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles did not affect NSC proliferation. MTT cell viability assay of NSCs labele...
Figure 5: PLL-γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles had low NSC cytotoxicity. Flow cytometry analysis showed the influence of...
Figure 6: Macropinocytotic vesicle containing PLL-γ-Fe2O3 and nanomag®-D-spio nanoparticles. Transmission ele...
Figure 7: Macropinocytosis is the mechanism of cellular uptake of PLL-γ-Fe2O3 and nanomag®-D-spio nanoparticl...
Figure 8: Labeling NSCs with PLL-γ-Fe2O3 and nanomag®-D-spio nanoparticles did not interfere with their stem/...
Figure 9: NSCs labeled with PLL-γ-Fe2O3 and nanomag®-D-spio nanoparticles differentiate into all three major ...
Figure 1: TEM micrographs of OM-NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanoparticles prepared at (a) 250, (b) 300 and (c) 350 °C for...
Figure 2: Particle size distribution of no. 4 OM-NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanoparticles (Table 1) determined by DLS.
Figure 3: X-ray diffraction patterns of OM-NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+: effect of (a) reaction temperature (time 1 h) and...
Figure 4: TEM analysis: (a) ED pattern, (b) comparison of experimental ED pattern and calculated XRD pattern,...
Figure 5: TEM analysis: (a) ED pattern, (b) comparison of experimental ED pattern and calculated XRD pattern,...
Figure 6: TGA of OM–NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanoparticles prepared at (a) different reaction temperatures for 1 h and...
Figure 7: NIR-to-vis upconversion emission spectra of OM–NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanoparticles excited at 980 nm with...
Figure 8: Energy-level diagram of Yb3+/Er3+ and the upconversion mechanism at 980 nm excitation. The doted an...
Figure 9: TEM micrograph of NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+&SiO2 nanoparticles. Inset: C – particle core and S – SiO2 shell.
Figure 10: ATR FTIR spectra of OM–NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ and NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+&SiO2 nanoparticles.
Figure 1: High resolution Ti 2p (left) and O 1s (right) XPS spectra of pristine titanium surfaces (A) and sur...
Figure 2: FTIR spectra of starting neridronate (A), APTES (B) and dopamine (C) organic moieties in their nati...
Figure 3: High resolution C 1s XPS spectra of neridronate (A), APTES siloxane (B) and PDA (C) films on the su...
Figure 4: AFM images of the neat, flat titanium surface (RRMS = 0.5 ± 0.3 nm) (A), and confluent anchor layer...
Figure 5: Differential IRRAS spectra of free alginate adsorbed onto a flat titanium surface (A) and covalentl...
Figure 6: High resolution C 1s XPS spectra of alginate coatings on neridronate (A), APTES siloxane (B) and PD...
Figure 7: Ellipsometric thickness and water contact angle evolution of ALG bound to neridronate, APTES siloxa...
Figure 8: Evolution of IRRAS spectra of ALG bound to neridronate (A), to APTES siloxane (B) and to PDA (C) up...
Scheme 1: Performed surface treatments and subsequent reactions for the activation and modification of titani...