This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2026, 17, 489–504, doi:10.3762/bjnano.17.32
Figure 1: UV–vis absorption spectra of GO samples (GO, rGO, Agro-GOP, Agro-GOX, and Agro-GOC).
Figure 2: Raman spectra of GO, rGO, Agro-GOP, Agro-GOX, and Agro-GOC samples, highlighting D and G bands.
Figure 3: XPS survey spectra of GO, rGO, Agro-GOP, Agro-GOX, and Agro-GOC samples, showing the presence of ca...
Figure 4: C 1s XPS spectra of (a) GO, (b) rGO, (c) Agro-GOP, (d) Agro-GOX, and (e) Agro-GOC samples. C1 is as...
Figure 5: ATR-FTIR spectra of GO samples (GO, rGO, Agro-GOP, Agro-GOX, Agro-GOC), showing characteristic vibr...
Figure 6: TEM images of GO-based materials: (a–d) GO, (e–h) rGO, (i–l) Agro-GOP, (m–p) Agro-GOX, and (q–t) Ag...
Figure 7: X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of GO, rGO, and agroindustrial waste-derived samples (Agro-GOP, Ag...
Figure 8: Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of GO, rGO, and agroindustrial waste-derived samples (Agro-...
Figure 9: UV–vis spectra of AuNPs and AuNPs supported on GO samples. The plasmon resonance peak appears at 52...
Figure 10: TEM images of AuNP-decorated GO-based materials. Each row represents a hybrid: (a–d) AuNPs@GO, (e–h...
Figure 11: Particle size distribution histograms of AuNPs deposited on GO platforms.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2020, 11, 1054–1061, doi:10.3762/bjnano.11.90
Figure 1: Characterization of the FLG-Ce6 hybrid nanomaterial. a) TEM images of FLG-Ce6; scale bar is 1 µm. b...
Figure 2: Schematic representation of the FLG-Ce6 hybrid nanomaterial. Ce6 molecules (green) stabilize a grap...
Figure 3: ROS production and PDT system characterization. a) UV–vis absorption spectra of pristine Ce6 (blue)...
Figure 4: Cell viability assays. a) C. albicans viability 48 h after PDT. The cell cultures were exposed to t...