6 article(s) from Albe, Karsten
Figure 1: Tensile stress–strain curves for a BMG in comparison to three NGs with grain sizes of 4 nm, 10 nm a...
Figure 2: Local atomic shear strain for Cu64Zr36 BMG and NGs with grain sizes of 4 nm, 10 nm and 16 nm, respe...
Figure 3: The ψ values for a BMG in comparison to three NGs with grain sizes of 4 nm, 10 nm and 16 nm, respec...
Figure 4: Tensile stress–strain curves for Cu64Zr36 and Cu36Zr64 BMGs and as-prepared (NG1), annealed (NG2), ...
Figure 5: Local atomic shear strain for (a) Cu36Zr64 and (b) Cu64Zr36 BMGs and as-prepared (NG1), annealed (N...
Figure 6: The ψ values for Cu64Zr36 and Cu36Zr64 BMGs and as-prepared (NG1), annealed (NG2), annealed and pre...
Figure 7: The fraction of Cu-centered full icosahedra and Voronoi volume in the Cu64Zr36 and Cu36Zr64 metalli...
Figure 1: BF-TEM images of the initial microstructure of ncPd 1 (a) and ncPd 2 (b) with the corresponding sel...
Figure 2: Orientation maps overlaid with reliability derived from ACOM-TEM of the as deposited sample in a) c...
Figure 3: Orientation analysis of the as prepared sputtered ncPd film. a) X-ray diffraction pattern of the as...
Figure 4: Crystallites recognized by ACOM-TEM for the as deposited sample and samples deformed to 5% and 10% ...
Figure 5: a) Crystallite and b) grain size as a function of strain based on ACOM-TEM (equivalent in-plane dia...
Figure 6: a) Twin crystallites/area as a function of strain based on the ACOM-TEM analysis (ncPd 1: red, ncPd...
Figure 7: Stress strain behavior and evolution of twin boundary density as a function of strain for grain siz...
Figure 8: Model of the deformation pathways: If growth twins are initially present, partial dislocations nucl...
Figure 1: Local composition of the grain interior and the GBs as a function of the global composition for two...
Figure 2: Atomic configurations after annealing with the hybrid MD/MC scheme. Ni atoms in the grain interior ...
Figure 3: Stress-strain behavior and dislocation density for structures of 15 nm grain size, which were equil...
Figure 4: Stress-strain behavior and dislocation density for structures of 15 nm grain size, which were equil...
Figure 5: Stress-strain behavior and dislocation density for structures of 15 nm grain size, which were equil...
Figure 6: Stress-strain behavior, dislocation density and evolution of GB volume for structures of 5 nm grain...
Figure 7: Irreversible change in GB volume (VGB) as a function of the irreversible change in total sample vol...
Figure 8: Correlation between yield stress (stress at plastic strain of 0.7%) and the change in free volume i...
Figure 1: Two observed modes of plasticity. (a) Snapshot of the extrusion from a 15.6 Å orifice showing the d...
Figure 2: The maximum shear component of the atomic stress tensor expressed by the colouring of the atoms (co...
Figure 3: Extrusion from a 15 Å orifice. Hydrostatic pressure, von Mises stress and the amount of extruded ma...
Figure 4: Extrusion from 15 Å orifice. (a) The nucleation of the first Shockley partial. (b) Two nonlocking s...
Figure 5: Dislocations interacting at the onset of plasticity. Colouring by the length of the Burgers vectors...
Figure 6: A dislocation multijunction blocking the dislocation mobility and nucleation in the system. Disloca...
Figure 7: Atomic arrangement during the breaking of the dendrite. (a–b) The locking multijunction (see Figure 6) is b...
Figure 8: Dislocation interacting to break the dendrite. (a–b) The locking multijunction (see Figure 6) is broken as ...
Figure 9: Hydrostatic pressure and von Mises stress at the onset of plasticity versus extrusion orifice radiu...
Figure 10: Extrusion from a 11 Å orifice. Hydrostatic pressure, von Mises stress and the amount of extruded ma...
Figure 11: Energy per atom with respect to the fcc phase at zero pressure for fcc and amorphous Cu. Energy of ...
Figure 1: The structure of the ordered phases with Strukturbericht designation “D022” (prototype structure: Al...
Figure 2: The vertical lines in the plot represent equipotential lines of the free energy for constant differ...
Figure 3: Calculated phase diagrams of Pt–Rh for three different particle sizes of 9201, 2075 and 807 atoms, ...
Figure 4: Equilibrium configurations of large particles with 9201 atoms at different concentrations and tempe...
Figure 5: Calculated phase diagram of bulk Pt–Rh (solid line) in comparison to that of a particle consisting ...
Figure 6:
All concentration-averaged Warren–Cowley short-range order parameters up to 8th neighbors for a Pt...
Figure 7:
Comparison of the (lower points) and
(upper points) WC-order parameters versus temperature for di...
Figure 8:
Comparison of the concentration-averaged order parameters (lower points) and
(upper points). The ...
Figure 9:
Comparison of the WC-order parameters (lower points) and
(upper points). The Pt concentration is ...
Figure 10:
Comparison of the order parameters (lower points) and
(upper points) constrained to a core region...
Figure 11:
Comparison of the 8 WC-order parameters and
of three different particle sizes and bulk material a...
Figure 12:
Comparison of the 8 averaged WC-order parameters of three different particle sizes and bulk materi...
Figure 1: Comparison of simulated ordering kinetics in bulk FePt alloys with results from annealing experimen...
Figure 2: Evolution of ordering fraction in a free FePt nanoparticle of D = 5 nm compared to the case of bulk...
Figure 3: Structure of a free 5 nm particle after 30 s of annealing time at 1000 K. Top: Pt atoms are display...
Figure 4: Snapshots of supported FePt nanoparticles illustrating the different interface energetics investiga...
Figure 5: Bottom panel: Evolution of LRO parameter with annealing time at 1000 K in free and supported FePt n...
Figure 6: Evolution of LRO parameter with annealing time at 1000 K in free and supported FePt nanoparticles w...