2 article(s) from Eensalu, Jako S
Figure 1: Surface views, by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of 70 nm (a) and 100 nm (b) thick annealed Sb2S...
Figure 2: S L2,3 XES spectra of two Sb2S3 films, as-deposited (“as-dep.”, blue) and after post-deposition tre...
Figure 3: (a) Effect of Sb2S3 absorber thickness on J–V curves at AM1.5G. (b) EQE of solar cells and transmit...
Figure 4: SEM cross-section of the best-performing 5.5% PCE solar cell (100 nm Sb2S3) and the corresponding d...
Figure 5: Photoconversion parameters of 100 nm Sb2S3 solar cells under illumination at AM1.5G as a function o...
Figure 6: Photoconversion parameters of (≈100 nm Sb2S3) solar cells at AM1.5G as a function of storage time. ...
Figure 7: Photoconversion parameters of 100 nm Sb2S3 solar cells without aging (black dots) or after 180 days...
Figure 1: Raman spectra (shifted for visibility) of the as-deposited and thermally treated Sb2S3 films deposi...
Figure 2: XRD patterns (shifted for visibility) of as-deposited and vacuum treated (170 °C or 200 °C, 5 minut...
Figure 3: Surface and cross-sectional views by SEM study of as-deposited Sb2S3 layers deposited from Sb/S 1:6...
Figure 4: Surface and cross-sectional views by SEM study of thermally treated (170 °C, 5 minutes) Sb2S3 layer...
Figure 5: Surface and cross-sectional views by SEM study of vacuum treated (200 °C, 5 minutes) Sb2S3 layers d...
Figure 6: Proposed growth mechanism paths of Sb2S3 by Volmer–Weber growth during ultrasonic spraying of metha...
Figure 7: Absorption coefficient (α) vs wavelength of glass/ITO/TiO2/Sb2S3 samples incorporating as-deposited...