1 article(s) from Friedrich, K Andreas
Comparison of the cycling performances of non-optimised Li–S batteries prepared with different bind...
Jump to Figure 1
SEM images of (a) DBC-PVDF before cycling, (b) DBC-PVDF after the 50th discharge, (c) SC-PVDF befor...
Jump to Figure 2
X-ray pattern of the Li2S sample before (a) and after (b) approximately 25 min in contact with air.
Jump to Figure 3
Mapping of DMT modulus and current/adhesion of basic materials used for cathode preparation from AF...
Jump to Figure 4
Statistical evaluation of mechanical properties of the basic materials used for preparing the catho...
Jump to Figure 5
AFM images of an SC-PVDF sample before cycling. a) topography, b) deformation, c) adhesion, d) DMT ...
Jump to Figure 6
AFM image of topography, DMT modulus, and QNM™ current of a) SC-PVDF after cycling b) DBC-PVDF befo...
Jump to Figure 7
Conductive area during image acquisition under identical conditions at the cathodes before and afte...
Jump to Figure 8
Comparison of mean values of roughness, adhesion, energy dissipation, and stiffness, from statistic...
Jump to Figure 9
Discharge capacity of the optimized Li–S battery in the range of 2.8–1.5 V vs Li/Li+ at a current d...
Jump to Figure 10
Force separation curve with scheme of evaluation of mechanical properties by AFM (left) and scheme ...
Jump to Figure 11
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2013, 4, 611–624, doi:10.3762/bjnano.4.68
Subscribe to our Latest Articles RSS Feed.
Register and get informed about new articles.
Follow the Beilstein-Institut