3 article(s) from Gleiter, Herbert
- Review
- Published 22 Sep 2014
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Schematic representation of the interface in a nano-glass [5].
-
![]()
Figure 2: (a) As-quenched (from the vapor phase) nanoglassy grains exhibiting paramagnetic behavior, and (b) ...
-
![]()
Figure 3: Schematic representation of phase transformations in the free energy–configuration space.
-
![]()
Figure 4: (a) Sliding/Shear unit, according to the GBS Model. (b) Elevation view of the undeformed oblate sph...
-
![]()
Figure 5: Development of mesoscopic grain/interphase boundary sliding. Shaded grain boundaries of rhombic dod...
-
- Review
- Published 13 Sep 2013
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Comparison of the diffusivities in nanocrystalline (nc) Cu, Ni and Pd in comparison to the diffusiv...
-
![]()
Figure 2: Work-hardening rate of (Al-1.6 at % Cu) crystals at room temperature after a solution treatment, wa...
-
![]()
Figure 3: Figure showing the analogy between the defect and the chemical microstructures of nanocrystalline m...
-
![]()
Figure 4: Production of nanoglasses by consolidation on nanometer-sized glassy clusters produced by inert-gas...
-
![]()
Figure 5: Synthesis of an Au-based nanoglass by magnetron sputtering. Reproduced with permission from [7].
-
![]()
Figure 6: Constant-current scanning tunneling electron micrograph (STEM) of the polished surface of a Fe90Sc10...
-
![]()
Figure 7: (a) Selected electron diffraction pattern of a Fe25Sc75 nanoglass. Reproduced with permission from [18]...
-
![]()
Figure 8: Upper figure: Positron lifetime of the components τ1 (red line), τ2 (green line) and the mean posit...
-
![]()
Figure 9: (a) q2-Weighted SAXS curves of a 4.5 GPa Fe25Sc75 nanoglass as a function of annealing temperature....
-
![]()
Figure 10: Comparison of the Mössbauer spectra and the corresponding quadrupole splitting (QS) distribution (p...
-
![]()
Figure 11: Relative spectral fraction of the interfacial component versus the inverse size of the glassy regio...
-
![]()
Figure 12: Mössbauer spectra recorded at 295 K for the melt-spun ribbon, the nanosphere powder prior to consol...
-
![]()
Figure 13: Diagram displaying the temperature dependence of the measured magnetic hyperfine field (Bhf) of a m...
-
![]()
Figure 14: Molecular dynamics simulation of the consolidation of a nanoglass at 300 K [27]. The nanoglass is obtai...
-
![]()
Figure 15: Proposed model of the structure of a nanoglass [27]. Reproduced with permission. According to the resul...
-
![]()
Figure 16: Magnetization curves (magnetization versus external magnetic field) of a nanoglass sample (red) and...
-
![]()
Figure 17: Stress–strain curve of a Sc75Fe25 nanoglass and of a melt-spun ribbon with the same chemical compos...
-
![]()
Figure 18: Calculated stress–strain curves for Cu64Zr36 nanoglasses with glassy regions with diameters of 4, 1...
-
![]()
Figure 19: Local atomic shear strain for chemically inhomogeneous (Cu-enriched interfaces) and chemically homo...
-
![]()
Figure 20: Left: Atomic shear strain in Cu64Zr36 nanoglass of 10 nm grain diameter at 8% and 16% total strain....
-
![]()
Figure 21: Cell proliferation at the surface of a melt-spun ribbon and at the surface of a nanoglass with the ...
-
![]()
Figure 22: Production of multiphase nanoglasses by the consolidation of glassy clusters with different chemica...
-
![]()
Figure 23: Structure of a two-phase nanoglass consisting of FeSc and Cu70Sc30 glassy clusters (Figure on the l...
-
![]()
Figure 24: Generation of an electrically charged surface in a nanoporous metal (e.g., Au) if it is immersed in...
-
