2 article(s) from Yang, Wanli
Figure 1: Surface views, by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of 70 nm (a) and 100 nm (b) thick annealed Sb2S...
Figure 2: S L2,3 XES spectra of two Sb2S3 films, as-deposited (“as-dep.”, blue) and after post-deposition tre...
Figure 3: (a) Effect of Sb2S3 absorber thickness on J–V curves at AM1.5G. (b) EQE of solar cells and transmit...
Figure 4: SEM cross-section of the best-performing 5.5% PCE solar cell (100 nm Sb2S3) and the corresponding d...
Figure 5: Photoconversion parameters of 100 nm Sb2S3 solar cells under illumination at AM1.5G as a function o...
Figure 6: Photoconversion parameters of (≈100 nm Sb2S3) solar cells at AM1.5G as a function of storage time. ...
Figure 7: Photoconversion parameters of 100 nm Sb2S3 solar cells without aging (black dots) or after 180 days...
Figure 1: Three configurations of a piezoelectric p–n junction: 1) R-C stands for the piezoelectric p–n junct...
Figure 2: Quasi-electrostatic analysis of a mechanically loaded piezoelectric p–n junction under a bias volta...
Figure 3: Comparison of I–V characteristics obtained from our model and the Shockley model under (a) forward-...
Figure 4: (a) I–V characteristics of a piezoelectric p–n junction under different loadings; (b) NEMC distribu...
Figure 5: (a) Current density as a function of applied tensile stress under two constant forward-bias voltage...
Figure 6: (a) I–V characteristics of a piezoelectric p–n junction under reverse-bias voltages and different a...
Figure 7: Positive current density under a reverse-bias voltage. (a) Current density under different applied ...
Figure 8: I–V characteristics for different loading locations under constant applied stress: (a) σ = −10 MPa;...
Figure 9: I–V characteristics of a CdS p–n junction with different doping concentrations exposed to mechanica...