Multicomponent reactions: A simple and efficient route to heterocyclic phosphonates

Chemistry Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  1. Corresponding author email
Associate Editor: T. J. J. Müller
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 1269–1301.
Received 08 Jan 2016, Accepted 23 May 2016, Published 21 Jun 2016
cc by logo


Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) are one of the most important processes for the preparation of highly functionalized organic compounds in modern synthetic chemistry. As shown in this review, they play an important role in organophosphorus chemistry where phosphorus reagents are used as substrates for the synthesis of a wide range of phosphorylated heterocycles. In this article, an overview about multicomponent reactions used for the synthesis of heterocyclic compounds bearing a phosphonate group on the ring is given.


Heterocyclic rings are found in many naturally occurring compounds and they compose the core structures of many biologically active scaffolds as well as some industrial compounds [1-3]. On the other hand, phosphonic acid and its related derivatives are considered as potential bioisosters of the corresponding carboxylic acids [4]. Thus, the incorporation of phosphonyl groups into the heterocyclic systems has led to an important class of organophosphorus compounds that has attracted the attention of both industrial and medicinal chemists [5-12]. Many efforts have been made to prepare these bioactive compounds over the last 60 years [13]. There are two general approaches to the synthesis of heterocyclic phosphonates: (a) the direct electrophilic or nucleophilic phosphorylation of the heterocyclic systems and (b) the ring closure of phosphoryl-functionalized substrates through cyclization or cycloaddition reactions [14-19].

Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) constitute one of the most efficient tools in modern synthetic organic chemistry, since they have all features that contribute to an ideal synthesis: high atom efficiency, quick and simple implementation, time and energy saving, environment-friendly and they offer a target and diversity-oriented synthesis [20]. Therefore, the development of new multicomponent reactions towards biomedical and industrial scaffolds is inevitable at the present time. Furthermore, the combination of established multicomponent reactions with post-reaction transformations opens the way towards a vast number of diverse and complex products. Some of these post-MCR transformations are: intramolecular cycloaddition reactions, Knoevenagel condensations, metathesis reactions, aza-Wittig reactions, Mitsunobu reactions, etc. [21].

Up to now, two review articles have been reported on azaheterocyclic phosphonates [22,23], but no overview article about the multicomponent synthesis of phosphono-substituted heterocycles has been reported so far. This review focuses on general multicomponent reactions as well as on modified MCR towards heterocyclic phosphonates. It is organized by the reaction types and covers literature published up to September 2015.


1 Biginelli condensation

The classical Biginelli condensation involves the reaction of an aldehyde 1 with urea (2) and a β-ketoester 3 under acidic conditions in refluxing ethanol to yield 3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2-one derivatives 4 (Scheme 1) [24].


Scheme 1: The Biginelli condensation.

Although, a large number of CH-acidic carbonyl compounds such as β-diketones, β-keto thioesters, acetoacetamides and nitroacetone have been shown to participate in the classical Biginelli reaction [25], β-ketophosphonates 6 were found to be unreactive in similar conditions [26]. However, Yuan et al. developed a modified Biginelli condensation by using ytterbium triflate as a catalyst (Scheme 2) [26] and the 3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2-one derivatives 4 were formed in 15–58% yields depending on the structure of the β-ketophosphonate 6 and aldehyde 5. Based on their investigations, aliphatic aldehydes including propionaldehyde and butyraldehyde were resistant to this reaction.


Scheme 2: The Biginelli reaction of β-ketophosphonates catalyzed by ytterbium triflate.

The trimethylchlorosilane-mediated one-pot reaction of diethyl (3,3,3-trifluoropropyl-2-oxo)phosphonate (8) with aryl aldehydes 9 and urea under Biginelli conditions has been presented by Timoshenko et al. (Scheme 3) [27]. The resulting 4-hydroxytetrahydropyrimidin-2-ones 10 were unstable and underwent dephosphorylation to give dihydropyrimidin-2-ones 11 after one week at room temperature. Also, heating of either the reactants or product 10 in the presence of acetic acid led to the formation of dihydropyrimidin-2-ones 11 (Scheme 3).


Scheme 3: Trimethylchlorosilane-mediated Biginelli reaction of diethyl (3,3,3-trifluoropropyl-2-oxo)phosphonate.

However, the authors successfully used trialkyl orthoformates 13 to produce dialkyl (2-oxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2-dihydropyrimidin-5-yl)phosphonates 14 which were converted to dialkyl (4-alkoxy-2-oxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidin-5-yl)phosphonates 15 through the nucleophilic addition of the liberated alcohol to the electrophilic double bond of the CF3−C=N segment (Scheme 4).


Scheme 4: Biginelli reaction of dialkyl (3,3,3-trifluoropropyl-2-oxo)phosphonate with trialkyl orthoformates and urea.

Idris Essid and Soufiane Touil showed that the Biginelli condensation of β-ketophosphonates was highly sensitive to the nature of solvents, acid catalysts and reactants [28]. They found that the use of inorganic acids including HCl and H2SO4 or Lewis acids such as SnCl2, FeCl3 and VCl3, as well as heterogeneous catalysts including silica gel supported sulfuric acid and sodium hydrogen sulfate did not affect this reaction. Also, the reaction in the presence of p-toluenesulfonic acid (TsOH), in aprotic solvents proceeded with much better yields than in protic solvents. When diethyl (2-oxopropyl)phosphonate and 4-nitrobenzaldehyde were treated in the presence of 50 mol % TsOH in acetonitrile, 5-phosphonato-3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2-one 18 was obtained in excellent yield (Scheme 5).


Scheme 5: p-Toluenesulfonic acid-promoted Biginelli reaction of β-ketophosphonates, aryl aldehydes and urea.

2 Kabachnik−Fields reaction and its post-condensation modifications

The one-pot three-component reaction between aldehydes 19 (or ketones), amines 20 and dialkyl phosphonates 21 to afford α-aminophosphonates 22 is traditionally known as the Kabachnik–Fields reaction. This reaction was first reported in 1952 by Kabachnik, Medved and Fields (Scheme 6) [29,30].


Scheme 6: General Kabachnik–Fields reaction for the synthesis of α-aminophosphonates.

Due to their wide range of biological activities, α-aminophosphonates have been extensively investigated and several reviews about their syntheses through the Kabachnik–Fields reaction have been reported [31-33]. However, an important feature of this reaction is that it provides an efficient route to phosphonylated heterocycles. The different applications of the Kabachnik–Fields reaction in the preparation of phosphonylated heterocycles can be classified into two major categories: a) phosphonylation of heterocyclic ketones through a classic Kabachnik–Fields reaction and b) synthesis of heterocyclic phosphonates through modification of the products obtained by the Kabachnik–Fields reaction.

2.1 Phosphorylation of the parent heterocycles through a traditional Kabachnik–Fields reaction

Heterocycloalkanones may be used as carbonyl components in the Kabachnik–Fields reaction to give cyclic α-aminophosphonates. Unfortunately there are only a few examples of Kabachnik–Fields reactions of heterocycloalkanones in the literature. The tetra(tert-butyl)phthalocyanine–AlCl complex catalyzed three component reaction of N-Boc-piperidin-4-one (23) with (EtO)2P(O)H (24) and benzylamine (25) afforded the cyclic α-aminophosphonate 26 in 99% yield (Scheme 7) [34].


Scheme 7: Phthalocyanine–AlCl catalyzed Kabachnik–Fields reaction of N-Boc-piperidin-4-one with diethyl phosphite and benzylamine.

The reaction of isatin (27) with diethyl phosphite and benzylamine under similar conditions gave the corresponding α-aminophosphonate 28 in 90% yield together with small amounts of α-hydroxyphosphonate 29 as a side product (Scheme 8).


Scheme 8: Kabachnik–Fields reaction of isatin with diethyl phosphite and benzylamine.

The one-pot reaction of substituted isatins 30 with aniline (32) and dimethyl- or diethyl phosphite under solvent-free conditions in the presence of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticle-supported phosphotungstic acid as a recyclable catalyst at 80 °C furnished α-aminophosphonates 33 in yields from 80% to 98% depending on the reaction time and the structure of the dialkyl phosphite and isatin (Scheme 9) [35].


Scheme 9: Magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticle-supported phosphotungstic acid-catalyzed Kabachnik–Fields reaction of isatin with dialkyl phosphites and aniline.

In this way a one-pot three-component reaction between 1-tosylpiperidine-4-one (34), aromatic amines 35 and diethyl phosphonate in the presence of magnesium perchlorate as a catalyst, under neat conditions at 80 °C afforded α-aminophosphonates 36 in good yields (Scheme 10). Some of the resulting α-aminophosphonates showed insecticidal activity against Plutella xylostella [36].


Scheme 10: The Mg(ClO4)2-catalyzed Kabachnik–Fields reaction of 1-tosylpiperidine-4-one.

An asymmetric synthesis of heterocyclic α-aminophosphonates has been reported by Fadel et al. [37]. Their studies showed that the three-component reaction of N-Boc-3-piperidinone (37), (S)-configured amines 39 and triethyl phosphite (38), in the presence of 2 equiv of AcOH and 0.8 equiv of MgSO4 at 50 °C afforded a 60:40 diastereomeric mixture of α-aminophosphonates (R,S)-40 and (S,S)-41 in 75% combined yield. The cleavage of the N-Boc group followed by removal of the benzyl groups and acidic hydrolysis of the resulting (α-amino-3-piperidinyl)phosphonates (R)-42 and (S)-43 led to enantiopure α-amino-3-piperidinylphosphonic acids (R)-44 and (S)-45 in good yields (Scheme 11).


Scheme 11: An asymmetric version of the Kabachnik–Fields reaction for the synthesis of α-amino-3-piperidinylphosphonic acids.

2.2 Construction of heterocyclic phosphonates via post-condensation modification of Kabachnik–Fields reaction

2.2.1 2-Pyrrolidinylphosphonate: Post-condensation modifications of Kabachnik–Fields reaction products usually rely on transformations of functional groups present in the formed α-aminophosphonates or by the use of additional reagents. One of the most important sequences for the rapid access of heterocyclic phosphonates is the combination of the Kabachnik–Fields reaction with a subsequent ring closure. Thus, the one-pot reaction of 5-chloro-2-pentanone (46) with ammonia and diethyl phosphonate in ethanol lead to the non-isolable intermediate 47 which was directly converted to diethyl (2-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)phosphonate 48 by ring closure through an intramolecular nucleophilic substitution (Scheme 12). Subsequent oxidation of 48 with m-chloroperbenzoic acid afforded the corresponding N-oxide 49 which was used for the in vitro and in vivo spin trapping of hydroxyl and superoxide radicals [38].


Scheme 12: A classical Kabachnik–Fields reaction followed by an intramolecular ring-closing reaction for the synthesis of diethyl (2-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)phosphonate.

2.2.2 2-Phosphono-6-oxazolopiperidines: An asymmetric Kabachnik–Fields reaction between (R)-(−)-phenylglycinol (50), glutaraldehyde (51) and triethyl phosphite has been reported by Royer et al. The reaction furnished a diastereomeric mixture of 2-phosphono-6-oxazolopiperidines 52 with 58% yield and 79:21 dr. Further reduction and hydrogenolysis of 52 in the presence of Pd/C led to aminoester 53 which was converted to (S)-piperidin-2-phosphonic acid (54) through acidic hydrolysis and subsequent treatment with propylene oxide in 42% overall yield and 58% ee (Scheme 13) [39].


Scheme 13: Synthesis of (S)-piperidin-2-phosphonic acid through an asymmetric Kabachnik–Fields reaction.

2.2.3 Isoindolinylphosphonates: A one-pot diastereoselective multicomponent reaction towards (isoindolin-1-one-3-yl)phosphonates has been developed by Ordóñez et al. (Scheme 14) [40]. The reaction of 2-formylbenzoic acid (55) with (S)- or (R)-amines 56 and dimethyl phosphonate under solvent and catalyst-free conditions at 80 °C afforded (3R,1'S)-isoindolin-1-one-3-phosphonates 57 and (3S,1'S)-isoindolin-1-one-3-phosphonates 58. The best results concerning yield and selectivity were obtained with (S)-methylbenzylamine that furnished isoindolin-1-one-3-phosphonates 57 and 58 in 75% yields and a 95:05 diastereoisomeric ratio.


Scheme 14: A modified diastereoselective Kabachnik–Fields reaction for the synthesis of isoindolin-1-one-3-phosphonates.

The same research group found a useful method for the synthesis of isoindolin-1-one-3-phosphonates from aromatic amines [41]. The one-pot reaction of aniline 59 with formylbenzoic acid (55) and dimethyl phosphonate (31) under the above-mentioned conditions at 90 °C afforded the desired isoindolin-1-one-3-phosphonates 60 in only 14% yields after five days. Noteworthy, the treatment of the same reaction mixture under microwave irradiation at 90 °C gave the expected product 60 in 77% yields after several minutes. Subsequently, the isoindolin-1-one-3-phosphonates 60 were dephosphorylated by treatment with lithium aluminum hydride to give isoindolin-1-ones 61 (Scheme 15).


Scheme 15: A microwave-assisted Kabachnik–Fields reaction toward isoindolin-1-ones.

Also the Kabachnik–Fields reaction of formylbenzoic acid (55), dimethyl phosphonate and amines 62 or 66 followed by subsequent Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons reaction of the resulting cycloadducts 63 and 67 with arylaldehydes 64 or 68 afforded the corresponding 3-arylmethyleneisoindolin-1-ones 65 and 69, respectively (Scheme 16) [42,43].


Scheme 16: The synthesis of 3-arylmethyleneisoindolin-1-ones through a Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons reaction of Kabachnik–Fields reaction products.

Recently, an efficient method was developed for the synthesis of ethyl (2-alkyl- and 2-aryl-3-oxoisoindolin-1-yl)phosphonates 71 from 2-formylbenzoic acid (55), triethyl phosphite and amines 70 using OSU-6, a novel MCM-41-type hexagonal mesoporous silica, as a catalyst (Scheme 17) [44]. The important advantages of this methodology is that the (3-oxoisoindolin-1-yl)phosphonates 71 are obtained in high yields from benzylic, aliphatic and aromatic amines possessing both, electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups, in shorter reaction times with minimum purification requirements. Also, the catalyst can be used for up to four reaction cycles without significant loss of activity.


Scheme 17: An efficient one-pot method for the synthesis of ethyl (2-alkyl- and 2-aryl-3-oxoisoindolin-1-yl)phosphonates.

An efficient method for the synthetic preparation of diverse (2H-isoindol-1-yl)phosphonates 74 is an FeCl3-catalyzed Kabachnik–Fields reaction of 2-alkynylbenzaldehydes 72, anilines 73, and phosphonates followed by a PdCl2-catalyzed 5-exo-dig cyclization (Scheme 18) [45]. The desired (2H-isoindol-1-yl)phosphonates 74 were obtained under optimized conditions (5 mol % of FeCl3, 5 mol % of PdCl2, DCE/CH3CN, 60 °C) in good to excellent yields. One limitation is the use of aromatic aldehydes bearing electron-donating substituents which afforded the desired products in only low yields, because of their reduced electrophilicity. Aliphatic amines were unreactive in this transformation and only arylamines were found to be effective in this reaction. Eventually, the biological evaluation of the (2H-isoindol-1-yl)phosphonates 74 revealed their potential as HCT-116 inhibitors.


Scheme 18: FeCl3 and PdCl2 co-catalyzed three-component reaction of 2-alkynylbenzaldehydes, anilines, and diethyl phosphonate.

2.2.4 Pyrazolyl- and oxazolylphosphonates: A series of modified Kabachnik–Fields condensations based on the reaction of 6-methyl-3-formylchromone (75) with some 1,2-, 1,3- and 1,4-bi-nucleophiles and diethyl phosphonate under solvent-free conditions have been developed by E. Ali et al. [46]. The resulting α-aminophosphonate intermediates 77 and 80 were non-isolable and interconverted to the corresponding heterocyclic phosphonates via ring opening through an intramolecular nucleophilic attack at the 2-position of the pyrone. Thus, the three-component reaction of 75 with hydrazine derivatives 76 or hydroxylamine 79 in the presence of diethyl phosphonate led to pyrazolylphosphonate 78 and oxazolylphosphonate 81, respectively (Scheme 19).


Scheme 19: Three-component reaction of 6-methyl-3-formylchromone (75) with hydrazine derivatives or hydroxylamine in the presence of diethyl phosphonate.

2.2.5 Pyrimidinylphosphonates: The 1,3-bi-nucleuphiles such as thiourea (82), guanidinium carbonate 84 and cyanoguanidine 86, under the above mentioned conditions afforded the pyrimidinylphosphonates 83, 85 and 87, respectively (Scheme 20).


Scheme 20: Three-component reaction of 6-methyl-3-formylchromone (75) with thiourea, guanidinium carbonate or cyanoguanidine in the presence of diethyl phosphonate.

2.2.6 Diazepinyl- and oxazepinylphosphonates: The three-component reaction of 1,4-bi-nucleophiles such as ethanolamine (88), ethylenediamine (89), 2-aminophenol (92) and 1,2-phenylenediamine (93), with 6-methyl-3-formylchromone (75) and diethyl phosphonate afforded the phosphonate derivatives of 1,4-oxazepine 90, 1,4-diazepine 91, 1,5-benzoxazepine 94 and 1,5-benzodiazepine 95, respectively (Scheme 21).


Scheme 21: Three-component reaction of 6-methyl-3-formylchromone (75) with 1,4-bi-nucleophiles in the presence of diethyl phosphonate.

2.2.7 Isoquinolone-1-phosphonates: From Lewis acid catalyzed 6-endo-dig cyclizations of acetylenic Kabachnik–Fields adducts: A modified Kabachnik–Fields reaction for the synthesis of isoquinoline-1-phosphonate derivatives is the three-component reaction of acetylenic aldehydes with various amines and dialkyl phosphonates followed by Lewis acid catalyzed 6-endo-dig cyclizations. Wu et al. reported the one-pot reaction of 2-alkynylbenzaldehydes 96, amines 97, and diethyl phosphonate to afford (2,3-disubstituted-1,2-dihydroisoquinolin-1-yl)phosphonates 98 in the presence of various Lewis acids (Scheme 22) [47,48]. This reaction, under catalyst-free conditions or in the presence of Lewis acids such as FeCl3, CBr4, In(OTf)3, Bi(OTf)3, and Yb(OTf)3, exclusively yielded the acyclic α-aminophosphonates 99. However, the reaction in the presence of AgOTf (5 mol %) or CuI (10 mol %) at 60 °C led to isoquinolin-1-ylphosphonates 98 in moderate to high yields.


Scheme 22: One-pot three-component reaction of 2-alkynylbenzaldehydes, amines, and diethyl phosphonate.

In addition, this reaction in the presence of palladium catalysts such as Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 and PdCl2 gave 1,2-dihydroisoquinolin-1-ylphosphonates 98 in 79% and 81% yields, respectively.

Lewis acid–surfactant combined catalysts (LASC) are another catalytic system which has been used for the three-component reaction of 2-alkynylbenzaldehydes, amines, and nucleophiles such as alkynes, nitromethane, or diethyl phosphonate in water under ultrasonic conditions [49]. As depicted in Scheme 23, the reaction of 2-alkynylbenzaldehyde 100, aniline (32) and diethyl phosphonate catalyzed by C12H25SO3Na–CuSO4 (10 mol %) or Ag(C12H25SO3) (10 mol %) under ultrasonic conditions in an aqueous medium afforded the desired 1,2-dihydroisoquinolin-1-ylphosphonate 101 in 65% and 79% yields, respectively.


Scheme 23: Lewis acid–surfactant combined catalysts for the one-pot three-component reaction of 2-alkynylbenzaldehydes, amines, and diethyl phosphonate.

A more detailed investigation on the catalytic cyclization during Kabachnik–Fields reactions of acetylenic aldehydes with aromatic amines and dialkyl phosphonates has been reported by Čikotienė et al. [50]. They found that the cyclization type during these three-component reactions strongly depends on the nature of the acetylenic aldehydes 102. The Kabachnik–Fields adducts of various carbocyclic acetylenic aldehydes 104 and 105 in the presence of AuBr3, PdCl2, AgOTf, AgNO3 or I+ underwent a 5-exo-dig cyclization to give dialkyl 1H-pyrrol-2-ylphosphonates 106. However, iodine-mediated cyclizations lead to pyrrol-1-ylphosphonates bearing a carbonyl (107) or 1-iodoalkenyl substituent (108) depending on the substituent R. In contrast, electron-deficient heterocycles 113 and 114 in the presence of CuI reacted through a tandem imine formation–6-endo-dig cyclization to give the corresponding 1,2-dihydropyridin-2-ylphosphonates 115. However, electron-rich heterocyclic Kabachnik–Fields adducts were found to be unreactive towards Lewis acid catalyzed cyclization processes. On the other hand, benzene derivatives 109 can participate in both cyclization modes depending on the catalyst’s nature. They either can cyclize to give the corresponding 1,2-dihydropyridin-2-ylphosphonates 111 in the presence of CF3SO3Ag, while in the presence of AuBr3, PdCl2 or I+, they undergo a 5-exo-dig cyclization to give dialkyl 1H-pyrrol-2-ylphosphonates 110 or 112 (Scheme 24).


Scheme 24: Lewis acid catalyzed cyclization of different Kabachnik–Fields adducts.

Other cyclization reactions of Kabachnik–Fields adducts into isoquinolone-1-phosphonates: A one-pot three-component synthesis of N-arylisoquinolone-1-phosphonates 119 through the Kabachnik–Fields reaction of ethyl 2-(2-formyl-4,5-dimethoxyphenyl)acetate (116) with anilines 117 and triethyl phosphite in the presence of trifluoroacetic acid as catalyst has been reported by Borse et al. (Scheme 25) [51]. The desired N-arylisoquinolone-1-phosphonates 119 were formed through the intramolecular addition of the amino group to the ester functionality in the Kabachnik–Fields adducts 118. The yields ranged between 64% and 74% depending on the nature of the substituents present in the aromatic amines 117.


Scheme 25: Three-component synthesis of N-arylisoquinolone-1-phosphonates 119.

A CuI-catalyzed three-component tandem reaction of 2-(2-formylphenyl)ethanones 120, aromatic amines 121, and diethyl phosphonate leading to 1,2-dihydroisoquinolin-1-ylphosphonates 123 has been reported by Wu et al. (Scheme 26) [52]. This reaction proceeds via the imine intermediate 122 resulting from the reaction of 2-(2-formylphenyl)ethanones 120 with amines 121. The tandem nucleophilic addition of phosphite to the imine and subsequent condensation of the formed amine with the ketone group leads to 1,2-dihydroisoquinolin-1-ylphosphonates 123. A wide range of substituted aromatic amines and several 2-(2-formylphenyl)ethanones under optimized conditions [CuI (10 mol %), 1,2-dichloroethane, 70 °C] afforded the corresponding 1,2-dihydroisoquinolin-1-ylphosphonates in good to excellent yields.


Scheme 26: CuI-catalyzed three-component tandem reaction of 2-(2-formylphenyl)ethanones with aromatic amines and diethyl phosphonate.

2.2.8 Benzodiazepinylphosphonates: There are only two publications related to the multicomponent synthesis of benzodiazepinylphosphonates in the literature. Both syntheses are based on o-diaminobenzene as the starting material. In the first method, an YbCl3-catalyzed three-component reaction between an o-diaminobenzene 124, 2,4-pentanedione (125) and diethyl phosphite under optimized solvent-free conditions (10 mol % of YbCl3, 22 °C, 1:1:1 molar ratio of starting materials) afforded 1,5-benzodiazepin-2-ylphosphonates 126 in moderate yields (Scheme 27) [53]. The undesired diphosphonate 127 was formed in 1:1:2 or 1:1:4 molar ratio of o-diaminobenzene 124, 1,3-butanediones 125 and diethyl phosphite. When butanediones 128 with a larger substituent than Me were used, only monophosphonates 129 were obtained.


Scheme 27: Synthesis of 1,5-benzodiazepin-2-ylphosphonates via ytterbium chloride-catalyzed three-component reaction.

The second method comprises a one-pot four-component reaction of diamines 130, ketones 131 and phosphites 132 in the presence of FeCl3 as a catalyst to give benzodiazepinylphosphonates 133 and 134 and has been reported by Bhattacharya et al. (Scheme 28) [54]. The authors observed that the presence of molecular sieves (4 Å) had a beneficial effect on the yield of the reaction due to trapping of water resulting from the imine formation reaction. The generality of the reaction has been investigated by the use of structurally diverse diamines, ketones and phosphonates. While the reaction proceeded well with different amines and phosphonates, only the use of acetone as the ketone component afforded the corresponding benzodiazepinylphosphonates. With other ketones only ketimine intermediates were obtained which were sterically too crowded for attacking the phosphorus atom of the phosphonates. The use of unsymmetrically substituted diamines led to the corresponding syn-regioisomers as the major product and the anti-regioisomer as the minor product. Some of the synthesized 1,5-benzodiazepin-2-ylphosphonates showed cysteine protease inhibition activities.


Scheme 28: FeCl3-catalyzed four-component reaction for the synthesis of 1,5-benzodiazepin-2-ylphosphonates.

2.2.9 Heterocyclic bisphosphonates: A modified Kabachnik–Fields reaction of the substituted amine 135 with triethyl orthoformate followed by reaction with sodium diethylphosphite afforded bisphosphonate intermediate 136 that was converted to the heterocyclic bisphosphonate 137 through an intramolecular cyclization (Scheme 29) [55]. The sequenced reaction of the amine with triethyl orthoformate followed by the addition of sodium diethylphosphite dissolved in toluene considerably increased the yields of bisphosphonates.


Scheme 29: Synthesis of indole bisphosphonates through a modified Kabachnik–Fields reaction.

In this way, carbamate 138, hexahydrobenzothiophene 140 and benzothiophene 142 were converted to the corresponding bisphosphonates 139, 141 and 143, respectively (Scheme 30). The synthesized heterocyclic bisphosphonates showed anti-inflammatory properties.


Scheme 30: Synthesis of heterocyclic bisphosphonates via Kabachnik–Fields reaction of triethyl orthoformate.

3 Knoevenagel-induced domino reactions

An efficient method into phosphorylated heterocycles is the condensation of an activated methylene component with a carbonyl compound followed by subsequent transformations such as intramolecular cyclization, Michael-type addition and hetero-Diels–Alder cycloaddition.

3.1 Domino Knoevenagel/phospha-Michael process

A convenient one-pot ZnO nanorods-catalyzed reaction of isatin derivatives 144 with malononitrile (145) and dialkyl or diphenyl phosphonates 146 has been performed to give 2-oxindolin-3-ylphosphonates 147 (Scheme 31) [56]. The products were obtained in good to excellent yields using 10 mol % of the catalyst under solvent-free conditions at room temperature. However, when using ethyl cyanomalonate instead of malononitrile, the reaction in water led to the corresponding 2-oxoindolin-3-ylphosphonate in good yield. Further, the investigations showed that the recovered ZnO nanorods could be reused up to five times.


Scheme 31: A domino Knoevenagel/phospha-Michael process for the synthesis of 2-oxoindolin-3-ylphosphonates.

Some of the phospha-Michael adducts were converted to new phosphorylated heterocycles through intramolecular cyclization reactions. The phospha-Michael adduct 149 resulting from the three-component reaction of 6-methyl-3-formylchromone with malononitrile 145 or 2-cyanoacetamide 148 and diethyl phosphite is not isolable and spontaneously recyclized to dihydropyridinylphosphonate 150 (Scheme 32) [46].


Scheme 32: Intramolecular cyclization of phospha-Michael adducts to give dihydropyridinylphosphonates.

In this way, the reaction of 6-methyl-3-formylchromone (75) with cyclic 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds such as dimedone (151), 1-phenylpyrazolidine-3,5-dione (153) or barbituric acid (155) afforded the fused phosphonylpyrans 152, 154 and 156, respectively (Scheme 33).


Scheme 33: Synthesis of fused phosphonylpyrans via intramolecular cyclization of phospha-Michael adducts.

3.2 Three-component synthesis of (2-amino-3-cyano-4H-chromen-4-yl)phosphonates

Because of the widespread biological activities related to 2-amino-4H-chromene derivatives, the synthesis of (2-amino-3-cyano-4H-chromen-4-yl)phosphonates has attracted much attention from organic chemists. The best procedure for the preparation of these compounds involves a one-pot three-component reaction between salicylaldehydes 157, malononitrile (145) and trialkyl phosphite that was first reported by Perumal et al. (Scheme 34) [57]. The desired (2-amino-3-cyano-4H-chromen-4-yl)phosphonates 158 were obtained in good yields in the presence of InCl3 (20 mol %) at room temperature in ethanol.


Scheme 34: InCl3-catalyzed three-component synthesis of (2-amino-3-cyano-4H-chromen-4-yl)phosphonates.

In recent years, several methods using different catalysts have been developed to prepare 2-amino-3-cyano-4H-chromen-4-ylphosphonates. These methods and other aspects of reaction conditions are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Different catalytical methods for the synthesis of 2-amino-3-cyano-4H-chromen-4-ylphosphonates.

[Graphic 1]
Entry R R′ X Catalyst T (°C) Yields (%) Ref.
1 H, 3,5-di-Cl, 5-Br, 3,5-di-Br, 3,5-di-I, 3-OMe Et CN, COOEt β-CD 60–70 76–88 [58]
2 H, 5-Cl, 3,5-di-Cl, 5-Br, 3,5-di-Br, 5-Me, 3-OMe, 5-OMe, 5-NO2, 5,6-(CH=CH)2 Et CN K3PO4 rt 74–95 [59]
3 H, 5-Cl, 3,5-di-Cl, 3,5-di-Br, 5-Me, 3-OMe, 4-Et2N, 4,5-(CH=CH)2 Et, Me CN, COOEt PEG-400 80 81–92 [60]
4 H, 5-Cl Et CN, COOEt I2 rt 79–91 [61]
5 H, 5-Br, 3,5-di-Br, 3-Me, 5-Me, 4-OMe, 5-OMe, 5-NO2, 5,6-(CH=CH)2 Et CN, COOEt EDDA rt 40–90 [62]
6 H, 5-Cl, 3,5-di-Cl, 5-Br, 3,5-di-Br, 3-Me, 5-OMe, 5-NO2 Et CN Et2NH rt 90–95 [63]
7 H, 5-Cl, 5-Br, 5-Me, 3-OMe, 3-OEt Et CN electrocatalysis 20–78 88–93 [64]
8 H, 5-Cl, 5-Br, 3-Me, 5-NO2, 3-t-Bu Et, Me, Bu, Ph CN, COOEt TMG rt 65–96 [65]
9 H, 5-Cl, 5-Br, 3,5-di-Cl, 3,5-di-Br, 5-Me, 5-OMe, 5-NO2 Et CN, COOEt nano-MgO rt 68–92 [66]
10 H, 5-Br, 3,5-di-Cl, 3,5-di-Br, 3-Me, 5-OMe, 5-t-Bu, 3,5-di-t-Bu, 5,6-(CH=CH)2 Et, Me, iPr CN catalyst-free rt 68–90 [67]
11 H, 5-Br, 5-NO2, 3-t-Bu Et, Me, Bu, iPr CN dibutylamine rt 85–96 [68]
12 H, 5-Cl, 5-Br, 5-Me, 5-NO2, 3,5-di-Br, 3-OMe, 3-OEt Et, Ph CN LiOH rt 85–97 [69]
13 H, 5-Cl, 5-Br, 5-Me, 3-Br, 3-OMe, 3-OEt Et, Me, iPr CN, COOEt silica-bonded 2-HEAA rt 71–87 [70]
14 H, 5-Br, 5-Cl, 3,5-di-Br, 3,5-di-Cl, 5-Me, 4-OMe, 5-OMe, 5-NO2 Et CN Fe3O4@CS-SO3H NPs rt 88–97 [71]

3.2 Domino Knoevenagel/hetero-Diels–Alder process

The one-pot synthesis of dihydropyrans via a three-component reaction between an activated methylene compound, an aldehyde and an electron-rich alkene was firstly reported by Tietze et al. [72]. Collignon et al. applied this protocol for the preparation of phosphonodihydropyrans 163 or 164 starting from phosphonopyruvate 159 or phosphonopyruvamide 160, p-nitrobenzaldehyde (161) and ethyl vinyl ether (162) in a reactor equipped with a Dean–Stark separator (Scheme 35) [73]. The yields of the resulting cycloadducts 163 and 164 were 87% and 91%, respectively and were much higher than the overall yields of the corresponding multi-step reactions. Also, the trans/cis selectivity of phosphonodihydropyrans 163 and 164 was 24:76 and 22:78, respectively.


Scheme 35: Synthesis of phosphonodihydropyrans via a domino Knoevenagel/hetero-Diels–Alder process.

In this way, Gulea et al. synthesized phosphonodihydrothiopyrans 168 through the one-pot reaction of phosphonodithioacetate 165, aromatic aldehydes 166 and dienophiles 167 in the presence of piperidine in refluxing toluene (Scheme 36) [74]. The new phosphorylated cycloadducts were isolated in excellent yields and with a trans- or cis-diastereoselectivity.


Scheme 36: Multicomponent synthesis of phosphonodihydrothiopyrans via a domino Knoevenagel/hetero-Diels–Alder process.

4 Metal-catalyzed multicomponent reactions

Transition metals, especially Pd and Cu, are well-known catalysts for multicomponent reactions. Carbopalladation reactions of allenes, alkynes and carbon monoxide are very important processes in multicomponent syntheses. Additionally, copper-catalyzed multicomponent reactions such as azide–alkyne cycloadditions and various A3-coupling reactions are useful procedures in heterocyclic chemistry. However, several methods based on these protocols have also been developed for the synthesis of heterocyclic phosphonates.

The 1,2-dihydroisoquinolin-1-ylphosphonates 172 were formed through a one-pot reaction of 2-bromobenzaldehydes 169, alkynes 170, amines 171, and diethyl phosphonate under multicatalytic conditions including palladium and copper salts (Scheme 37) [75]. This process presumably involves a sequential Sonogashira coupling/cyclization-nucleophilic addition reaction, which is catalyzed by PdCl2(PPh3)2 and CuI whereas Cu(OTf)2 acts as a Lewis acid. The desired 1,2-dihydroisoquinolin-1-ylphosphonates 169 were isolated under optimized conditions [PdCl2(PPh3)2 (2 mol %), CuI (1 mol %), Cu(OTf)2 (10 mol %), Et3N, 4 Å molecular sieves, THF, 50–60 °C] in 40–70% yields.


Scheme 37: One-pot four-component synthesis of 1,2-dihydroisoquinolin-1-ylphosphonates under multicatalytic conditions.

A CuI-catalyzed four-component reaction through a methyleneaziridine ring-opening process has been developed for the synthesis of α-aminophosphonates [76]. Thus, the one-pot reaction between methyleneaziridines 173, Grignard reagents 174, alkyl halides 175 and dialkyl phosphonates in the presence of CuI afforded acyclic α-aminophosphonates 176. However, using difunctionalized electrophiles such as 1,3-diiodopropane 178 resulted in piperidinylphosphonates 179 with moderate yields (Scheme 38). This one-pot transformation involves an aziridine ring opening, C-alkylation, and hydrophosphorylation of the formed imine to create three intermolecular bonds.


Scheme 38: CuI-catalyzed four-component reactions of methyleneaziridines towards alkylphosphonates.

A ruthenium–porphyrin complex-catalyzed three-component reaction of α-diazophosphonates 180, nitrosoarenes 181, and alkynes 182 to give multifunctionalized aziridinylphosphonates 183 has been reported by Reddy et al. (Scheme 39) [77]. The desired aziridinylphosphonates 183 were isolated in 45–98% yields and 90:10 to >99:1 diastereoisomeric ratio depending on the structure of substituents present on nitrosoarenes 181 and alkynes 182. The use of internal alkynes gave only poor yields of the corresponding aziridinylphosphonates due to their low reactivity. This process involves the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of alkynes 182 with in situ generated nitrone 185 to afford isoxazolines 186 which rapidly rearrange to aziridinylphosphonates 183.


Scheme 39: Ruthenium–porphyrin complex-catalyzed three-component synthesis of aziridinylphosphonates and its proposed mechanism.

An efficient method for the synthesis of 1,2,3-triazoles is the copper(I)-catalyzed Husigen cycloaddition of azides with alkynes. Based on this method, Li et al. have developed a copper(I)-catalyzed three-component reaction between alkynes 187, azides 188 and dialkyl phosphonates 189 to give 1,2,3-triazolyl-5-phosphonates 190 (Scheme 40) [78]. The desired products were obtained in 62–88% yield under optimized conditions [CuCl (0.015 mmol), TEA (0.3 mmol), MeCN, rt, 20 h].


Scheme 40: Copper(I)-catalyzed three-component reaction towards 1,2,3-triazolyl-5-phosphonates.

5 Isocyanide-based multicomponent reactions

Although isocyanide-based multicomponent reactions (IMCRs) are one of the most important routes into heterocyclic compounds, there are only a few publications related to the isocyanide-based multicomponent synthesis of heterocyclic phosphonates in the literature. However, three different isocyanide-based multicomponent reactions for the synthesis of heterocyclic phosphonates are described here.

A one-pot three-component reaction between the acylphosphonates 192 formed by treatment of triethyl phosphite and acyl chlorides 191, isocyanides 193 and dialkyl acetylenedicarboxylates 194 to afford 2-phosphonofuran derivatives 196 has been reported by our group (Scheme 41) [79]. The desired furanylphosphonates were isolated in 52–67% yield at rt in CH2Cl2. In this transformation the zwitterionic intermediate 195, resulting from reaction of isocyanide with dialkyl acetylenedicarboxylate, added to the carbonyl group of the acylphosphonate followed by an intramolecular cyclization.


Scheme 41: Three-component reaction of acylphosphonates, isocyanides and dialkyl acetylenedicarboxylate to afford 2-phosphonofuran derivatives.

A palladium-catalyzed isocyanide-based three-component pathway into phosphorylated quinazolines has been described by Wu et al. [80]. The one-pot reaction of carbodiimide 197, isocyanide 199 and dialkyl phosphonates 198 under optimized conditions (10 mol % of Pd(OAc)2, 10 mol % of FeCl3, 10 mol % of DPPF, 3.0 equiv of Cs2CO3, toluene, reflux) led to (4-imino-3,4-dihydroquinazolin-2-yl)phosphonates 203 in 37–78% yields (Scheme 42). This process involves an initial nucleophilic addition of phosphite to carbodiimide 197 affording intermediate 200 which undergoes an oxidative addition of Pd(0) to give Pd(II) species 201. Subsequently, the insertion of isocyanide 199 to species 201 affords intermediate 202, which finally generates phosphorylated quinazoline 203 through reductive elimination.


Scheme 42: Synthesis of (4-imino-3,4-dihydroquinazolin-2-yl)phosphonates via an isocyanide-based three-component reaction.

A silver-catalyzed three-component reaction of α-isocyanophosphonates 206, ketones 205 and amines 204 under microwave irradiation to afford (2-imidazolin-4-yl)phosphonates 210 has recently been reported (Scheme 43) [81]. The yields of the products under optimized conditions were 53–89%. This process involved a Mannich-type addition of a silver-activated α-isocyanophosphonate anion 208 to an iminium salt 207, resulting from reaction of amine 204 and ketone 205, to give intermediate 209 which cyclizes to afford (2-imidazolin-4-yl)phosphonates 210.


Scheme 43: Silver-catalyzed three-component synthesis of (2-imidazolin-4-yl)phosphonates.

6 1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition-based multicomponent reactions

1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition-based multicomponent reactions usually involve the cycloaddition of in situ generated 1,3-dipoles and dipolarophiles to give five-membered heterocycles. In recent years, many heterocyclic phosphonates have been prepared via this efficient method.

One of the best strategies is based on the use of Bestmann–Ohira reagent (BOR) as the 1,3-dipole precursor. Smietana et al. accomplished a related three-component reaction with different aldehydes 211, nitrile derivatives 212 and dimethyldiazomethylphosphonate 213 to prepare phosponylpyrazoles 217 in the presence of KOH in MeOH in 73–95% yields (Scheme 44) [82]. Based on their explanation, the treatment of dimethyldiazomethylphosphonate 213 with a nucleophilic base generates diazo compound 215. The subsequent [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of 215 with Knoevenagel adduct 214, resulting from condensation of aldehydes 211 and nitrile derivatives 212, lead to cyclo-adduct intermediates 216 which cyclize to phosphorylated pyrazoles 217.


Scheme 44: Three-component synthesis of phosphonylpyrazoles.

In this way, a one-pot three-component reaction of aldehydes 218, methyl ketones 219 and the Bestmann–Ohira reagent has been developed for the preparation of different 3-carbo-5-phosphonylpyrazoles 223 (Scheme 45) [83]. The corresponding phosphonylpyrazoles 223 were formed via a Claisen–Schmidt/1,3-dipolar cycloaddition/oxidation process under basic conditions in MeOH in 30–91% yields.


Scheme 45: One-pot three-component synthesis of 3-carbo-5-phosphonylpyrazoles.

The dual reactivity of diethyl (1-diazo-2-oxopropyl)phosphonate (225) in a one-pot, two-step three-component method for the synthesis of phosphonylpyrazoles has been presented by Kumar et al. The phosphonate 225 acted both as a 1,3-dipole precursor and as a Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons (HWE) reagent. Therefore, the reaction of phosphonate 225 with aldehydes 224 generated terminal acetylenes 226 which cyclized with the second molecule of phosphonate 225 in the presence of Cu(I) to afford (5-methyl-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)phosphonates 230 in 46–81% yields (Scheme 46) [84].


Scheme 46: A one-pot two-step method for the synthesis of phosphonylpyrazoles.

Also, a domino reaction based on the dual reactivity of BOR as a homologation reagent as well as cycloaddition reactant for the synthesis of (5-vinylpyrazolyl)phosphonates 234 from α,β-unsaturated aldehydes 231 has been reported (Scheme 47) [85]. The desired vinylpyrazoles 234 were obtained in 46–95% yields under optimized conditions (2.5 equiv BOR, 2.5 equiv KOH, 25 °C, 6 min, MeOH). In this reaction, the generated diazomethyl anion 215 underwent a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition with α,β-unsaturated aldehydes 231 to give pyrazolinecarboxaldehyde 232. The subsequent reaction of aldehyde 232 with another molecule of BOR afforded pyrazoline alkyne intermediate 233 which, after a 1,3-hydrogen shift, aromatized to vinylpyrazoles 234.


Scheme 47: A one-pot method for the synthesis of (5-vinylpyrazolyl)phosphonates.

Recently, the [3 + 2] cycloaddition of phosphonate azomethine ylides 235 with ynones 236 to give substituted 1H-pyrrol-2-ylphosphonates 237 has been described by Yu et al. (Scheme 48) [86].


Scheme 48: Synthesis of 1H-pyrrol-2-ylphosphonates via the [3 + 2] cycloaddition of phosphonate azomethine ylides with ynones.

The desired 1H-pyrrol-2-ylphosphonate 241 could also be obtained through the three-component reaction of 4-chlorobenzaldehyde (238), aminomethylphosphonate 239 and ynones 240 in 57% yield (Scheme 49).


Scheme 49: Three-component synthesis of 1H-pyrrol-2-ylphosphonates.

7 Reissert-type multicomponent reactions

The traditional Reissert reaction is a one-pot treatment of quinoline (242) with acid chlorides 243 and KCN to afford Reissert compound 244 which can be hydrolyzed to give quinoline-2-carboxylic acid (245) (Scheme 50) [87].


Scheme 50: The classical Reissert reaction.

This reaction can also be applied to isoquinolines and some pyridines. Additionally, a wide range of activating groups such as chloroformates, acetylenic esters, R3SiOTf, Tf2O and various nucleophiles can be utilized in this reaction. For example, the one-pot reaction of isoquinoline (246) with KCN and chlorophosphates or chlorothiophosphates 247 has been described by Spatz and Popp. The corresponding N-phosphorylated isoquinolines 248 were obtained in 21–85% yields in CH2Cl2 at room temperature (Scheme 51) [88].


Scheme 51: One-pot three-component synthesis of N-phosphorylated isoquinolines.

Further, 1-acyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline-2-phosphonates 251 and 2-acyl-1,2-dihydroisoquinoline-1-phosphonates 252 have been prepared via the one-pot reaction of quinoline (242) or isoquinolines 249 with acyl chlorides 250 and trimethyl phosphite in the presence of NaI in 22–94% yields depending on the nature of the acyl chlorides and substituents X (Scheme 52) [89,90]. The three-component reaction of dimethyl phosphite, acetyl chloride and isoquinoline under refluxing in CH2Cl2 in the presence or absence of triethylamine led to the desired 1,2-dihydroisoquinoline-1-phosphonates in 66% and 45% yields, respectively. However, the reaction of trimethyl phosphite, acetyl chloride and isoquinoline in MeCN at 0 °C followed by heating at 50 °C gave the corresponding 1,2-dihydroisoquinoline-1-phosphonate in 85% yield.


Scheme 52: One-pot three-component synthesis of 1-acyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline-2-phosphonates and 2-acyl-1,2-dihydroisoquinoline-1-phosphonates.

Albouy et al. discovered an unexpected route towards 1,2-dihydropyridinylphosphonates during their studies of the base-catalyzed Pudovik reaction [91]. Unlike most other bases, the pyridine-mediated reaction of ethyl propiolate (253) and dialkyl phosphonates 254 led to 1,2-dihydropyridinylphosphonates 256. Thus, the 1,2-dihydropyridinylphosphonates 256 were synthesized via a one-pot three-component reaction of pyridine 255, ethyl propiolate (253) and dialkyl phosphonates 254 in moderate to good yields at 20 °C (Scheme 53). Under similar conditions, no reaction occurred with 2,6-lutidine (257) whereas 4-dimethylaminopyridine (258, DMAP) was efficiently converted to dialkylated 1,2-dihydropyridine-3-phosphonate 259.


Scheme 53: Three-component reaction of pyridine derivatives with ethyl propiolate and dialkyl phosphonates.

Yavari et al. have described the phosphorylation of benzothiazole (263) and isoquinoline (246) through a one-pot three-component reaction with activated acetylenes 260 and diphenyl phosphonate (261) under solvent-free conditions at room temperature (Scheme 54) [92]. Moderate to good yields (60–90%) of the desired heterocyclic phosphonates 262 and 264 were obtained.


Scheme 54: Three-component reactions for the phosphorylation of benzothiazole and isoquinoline.

The same group has also reported another Reissert-type reaction for the synthesis of 1,2-dihydroisoquinolin-1-ylphosphonates via activation of isoquinoline with isocyanate or isothiocyanate. In this case, the one-pot three-component reaction of isoquinoline and diphenyl phosphite with isocyanates 265 or isothiocyanates 266 furnished (dihydroisoquinolin-1-yl)phosphonates 267 or 268 in 96–99% yields under solvent-free conditions at room temperature (Scheme 55) [93].


Scheme 55: Three-component synthesis of diphenyl [2-(aminocarbonyl)- or [2-(aminothioxomethyl)-1,2-dihydroisoquinolin-1-yl]phosphonates.

A solvent-free stereoselective synthesis of 1,2-dihydroquinolin-2-ylphosphonates 271 and 1,2-dihydroisoquinolin-1-ylphosphonates 272 via the three-component reactions of quinoline or isoquinoline, dialkyl acetylenedicarboxylates 269, and dialkyl phosphonates 270 has been described by Shaabani et al. (Scheme 56) [94]. The corresponding products 271 and 272 were isolated in 52–61% yields and their nOe analysis revealed the geometry of the alkene bonds to be E .


Scheme 56: Three-component stereoselective synthesis of 1,2-dihydroquinolin-2-ylphosphonates and 1,2-dihydroisoquinolin-1-ylphosphonates.

A tandem 1,4–1,2 addition of dimethyl trimethylsilyl phosphite (DMPTMS, 273) to diazaheterocyclic compounds under microwave irradiation in acidic medium led to diphosphorylated products [95]. The 1,5-naphthyridine 274 and phenanthrolines 276, 278 and 280 in the presence of more than 2 equiv of DMPTMS were converted to the corresponding diphosphorylated products 275, 277, 279 and 281 with a high diastereoisomeric ratio (Scheme 57). In this reaction, the 1,4-addition of DMPTMS as a nucleophilic reagent on the N-protonated heterocycle followed by a 1,2-addition of DMPTMS on the N-silylated species lead to the diphosphorylated heterocycles after aqueous work-up.


Scheme 57: Diphosphorylation of diazaheterocyclic compounds via a tandem 1,4–1,2 addition of dimethyl trimethylsilyl phosphite.

8 Miscellaneous multicomponent reactions

The reaction of pentanedial (284) with acetamide (283) and acetyl chloride (282) in the presence of PCl3 and acetic acid gives a 1:1 mixture of piperidinyldiphosphonic acid 285 and acyclic (diaminoalkyl)diphosphonic acid 286. However, butanedial (287) under similar conditions affords exclusively pyrrolidinyldiphosphonic acid 288 in 39% yield (Scheme 58) [96].


Scheme 58: Multicomponent reaction of alkanedials, acetamide and acetyl chloride in the presence of PCl3 and acetic acid.

An oxidative domino three-component reaction of α-ketophosphonates 290, ammonium acetate and various 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds 289 to give pyridinylphosphonates 291 has been described. This method allowed the synthesis of highly functionalized pyridinylphosphonates 291 in 63–80% yields in refluxing AcOH/toluene 4:1 in the presence of 4 Å molecular sieves (Scheme 59) [97].


Scheme 59: An oxidative domino three-component synthesis of polyfunctionalized pyridines.

A sequential three-component enamine–azoene annulation reaction of primary aliphatic amines 292, activated methylene compounds 293, and 1,2-diaza-1,3-dienes (DDs, 294) has been reported to give polysubstituted pyrroles 295 (Scheme 60) [98]. The desired phosphono-substituted pyrroles were isolated in 41–87% yield under solvent and catalyst-free conditions.


Scheme 60: A sequential one-pot three-component synthesis of polysubstituted pyrroles.

Kaboudin et al. described a three-component, catalyst-free decarboxylative coupling of proline (296) with aldehydes 297 and dialkyl phosphonates to afford pyrrolidinylphosphonates 300. The corresponding pyrrolidinylphosphonates 300 were isolated in 43–86% yields under refluxing in toluene (Scheme 61) [99]. The reaction was proposed to proceed through the condensation of proline with an aldehyde under formation of oxazolidin-5-ones 298 followed by decarboxylation to give the azomethine ylides 299. Finally, the addition of dialkyl phosphonate to the azomethine ylides 299 afforded pyrrolidinylphosphonates 300.


Scheme 61: Three-component decarboxylative coupling of proline with aldehydes and dialkyl phosphites for the synthesis of pyrrolidinylphosphonates.

An efficient protocol comprising a domino aza-Wittig/phospha-Mannich sequence for the phosphorylation of isatin derivatives has been reported by Kumar et al. According to this method, the one-pot reaction of isatin derivatives 301, iminophosphorane 302, and diphenyl phosphonate in the presence of Cinchona-derived thiourea as the catalyst afforded α-aminophosphonates 303 in 70–81% yields and with 70–84% ee (Scheme 62) [100].


Scheme 62: Three-component domino aza-Wittig/phospha-Mannich sequence for the phosphorylation of isatin derivatives.

The trans-1,5-benzodiazepines 307 bearing both, perfluoroalkyl and phosphonate groups, were stereoselectively synthesized through a one-pot three-component condensation of o-phenylenediamines 304, fluorinated alkynylphosphonates 305 and aldehydes 306 (Scheme 63) [101]. The corresponding 1,5-benzodiazepines 307 were isolated in 56–89% yields under optimized conditions. In this reaction aromatic aldehydes afforded slightly higher yields than aliphatic aldehydes. Also, the yields of aromatic aldehydes bearing electron-donating substituents were higher than those bearing electron-withdrawing substituents.


Scheme 63: Stereoselective synthesis of phosphorylated trans-1,5-benzodiazepines via a one-pot three-component reaction.

Yavari et al. described the synthesis of phosphorylated 2,6-dioxohexahydropyrimidines 311 via a three-component reaction [102]. This method involved the one-pot reaction of N,N'-dimethylurea (310) and dialkyl acetylenedicarboxylates 309 in the presence of trialkyl phosphites 308 at room temperature (Scheme 64). The desired products were obtained in high yields between 84 and 94%.


Scheme 64: One-pot three-component synthesis of phosphorylated 2,6-dioxohexahydropyrimidines.


In this article the use of different multicomponent reactions (MCRs) for the synthesis of heterocyclic phosphonates has been reviewed. This review demonstrates the synthetic potential of multicomponent reactions for the construction of phosphono-substituted heterocyclic rings. The Kabachnik–Fields reaction can be considered the starting point of multicomponent synthesis of this class of compounds. However, the major advancements in this interesting field have been achieved in recent years. More than 75% of the cited literature in this review has been published within the last six years, of which more than three quarters dealt with the synthesis of new heterocyclic phosphonates from non-heterocyclic phosphorus reagents. The remaining works reported the phosphorylation of parent heterocyclic systems. It is worth mentioning, that most of the cited publications focused on the synthesis of five and six-membered rings and only four articles described the synthesis of three and seven-membered heterocycles. Additionally, the majority of the reported syntheses were devoted to the development of new methodologies including the use of advanced catalytic systems, alternative solvents and microwave irradiation. Thus, the development of novel MCR based on phosphorous reagents would allow the synthesis of macrocyclic and medium or large-sized heterocyclic systems, substances which are currently underrepresented in the literature. Further, the design of new biocompatible scaffolds such as β-lactams and peptidomimetics possessing phosphonate groups by MCR-based strategies would significantly extend the synthetic potential of MCRs towards heterocyclic phosphonates.


  1. Menor-Salván, C.; Martin-Yaseli, M. R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 5404–5415. doi:10.1039/C2CS35060B
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Ouin, L. D.; Tyrell, J. A. Fundamentals of heterocyclic chemistry: importance in nature and in the synthesis of pharmaceuticals; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey, 2010.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Pozharskii, A. F.; Soldatenkov, A. T.; Katritzky, A. R. Heterocycles in Industry and Technology. Heterocycles in Life and Society: An Introduction to Heterocyclic Chemistry, Biochemistry and Applications, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Chichester, United Kingdom, 2011; pp 209–246. doi:10.1002/9781119998372.ch9
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Demmer, C. S.; Krogsgaard-Larsen, N.; Bunch, L. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 7981–8006. doi:10.1021/cr2002646
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Redmore, D. Use as corrosion inhibitors: quinoline and isoquinoline phosphonates. U.S. Patent 3,888,627, June 10, 1975.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Malhotra, S. K.; Evoy, I. L. Diphenoxymethylpyridines having herbicidal properties. U.S. Patent 4,606,757, Aug 19, 1986.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Radi, S.; Lazrek, H. B. J. Chem. Res., Synop. 2002, 264–266. doi:10.3184/030823402103172149
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Sakoda, R.; Kamikawaji, Y.; Seto, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1992, 40, 2362–2369. doi:10.1248/cpb.40.2362
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Das, S.; Das, U.; Selvakumar, P.; Sharma, R. K.; Balzarini, J.; De Clercq, E.; Molnár, J.; Serly, J.; Baráth, Z.; Schatte, G.; Bandy, B.; Gorecki, D. K. J.; Dimmock, J. R. ChemMedChem 2009, 4, 1831–1840. doi:10.1002/cmdc.200900288
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Dang, Q.; Kasibthatla, S. R.; Jiang, T.; Taplin, F.; Gibson, T.; Potter, S. C.; van Poelje, P. D.; Erion, M. D. Med. Chem. Commun. 2011, 2, 287–290. doi:10.1039/C0MD00269K
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Johansson, T.; Kers, A.; Stawinski, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 2217–2220. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)00115-0
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Neef, G.; Eder, U.; Schmiechen, R.; Huth, A.; Rahtz, D.; Seidelmann, D.; Kehr, W.; Palenschat, D.; Braestrup, C. T. 3-Substituted beta-carbolines, process for their production and compositions containing them. Eur. Pat. Appl. EP0054507 A2, June 23, 1982.
    Chem. Abstr. 1983, 98, 16663.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Freedman, L. D.; Doak, G. O. Chem. Rev. 1957, 57, 479–523. doi:10.1021/cr50015a003
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Matevosyan, G. L.; Zavlin, P. M. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 1990, 26, 599–616. doi:10.1007/BF00756408
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Mukai, C.; Ohta, M.; Yamashita, H.; Kitagaki, S. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 6867–6873. doi:10.1021/jo0488614
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Han, J.; Paton, R. S.; Xu, B.; Hammond, G. B. Synthesis 2013, 45, 463–470. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1317984
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Anderson, D. K.; Deuwer, D. L.; Sikorski, J. A. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1995, 32, 893–898. doi:10.1002/jhet.5570320336
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Raimondi, W.; Dauzonne, D.; Constantieux, T.; Bonne, D.; Rodriguez, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 6119–6123. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201201192
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Kouno, R.; Tsubota, T.; Okauchi, T.; Minami, T. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4326–4332. doi:10.1021/jo000149t
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Wender, P. A. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 433–440. doi:10.1039/c4np00013g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Zhu, J.; Bienaymé, H., Eds. Multicomponent Reactions; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Van der Jeught, S.; Stevens, C. V. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 2672–2702. doi:10.1021/cr800315j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Moonen, K.; Laureyn, I.; Stevens, C. V. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 6177–6216. doi:10.1021/cr030451c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Biginelli, P. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1893, 23, 360–413.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Kappe, C. O. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 879–888. doi:10.1021/ar000048h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Gong, D.; Zhang, L.; Yuan, C. Heteroat. Chem. 2003, 14, 13–17. doi:10.1002/hc.10058
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  27. Timoshenko, V. M.; Markitanov, Yu. N.; Shermolovich, Yu. G. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2011, 47, 977–982. doi:10.1007/s10593-011-0863-4
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Essid, I.; Touil, S. ARKIVOC 2013, 98–106. doi:10.3998/ark.5550190.p007.871
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Kabachnik, M. I.; Medved, T. Y. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1952, 83, 689–692.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Fields, E. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 1528–1531. doi:10.1021/ja01126a054
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Cherkasov, R. A.; Galkin, V. I. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1998, 67, 857–882. doi:10.1070/RC1998v067n10ABEH000421
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Zefirov, N. S.; Matveeva, E. D. ARKIVOC 2008, 1–17. doi:10.3998/ark.5550190.0009.101
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Keglevich, G.; Bálint, E. Molecules 2012, 17, 12821–12835. doi:10.3390/molecules171112821
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Matveeva, E. D.; Podrugina, T. A.; Prisyajnoy, M. V.; Zefirov, N. S. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2006, 55, 1209–1214. doi:10.1007/s11172-006-0400-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Nazish, M.; Saravanan, S.; Khan, N. H.; Kumari, P.; Kureshy, R. I.; Abdi, S. H. R.; Bajaj, H. C. ChemPlusChem 2014, 79, 1753–1760. doi:10.1002/cplu.201402191
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Jiang, Z.; Zhao, J.; Gao, B.; Chen, S.; Qu, W.; Mei, X.; Rui, C.; Ning, J.; She, D. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2013, 188, 1026–1037. doi:10.1080/10426507.2012.729236
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Louaisil, N.; Rabasso, N.; Fadel, A. Synthesis 2007, 289–293. doi:10.1055/s-2006-958952
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Frejaville, C.; Karoui, H.; Tuccio, B.; le Moigne, F.; Culcasi, M.; Pietri, S.; Lauricella, R.; Tordo, P. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 1793–1794. doi:10.1039/C39940001793
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Maury, C.; Wang, Q.; Gharbaouni, T.; Chiadmi, M.; Tomas, A.; Royer, J.; Husson, H.-P. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 3627–3636. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(97)00086-0
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Viveros-Ceballos, J. L.; Cativiela, C.; Ordóñez, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2011, 22, 1479–1484. doi:10.1016/j.tetasy.2011.08.003
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Ordóñez, M.; Tibhe, G. D.; Zamudio-Medina, A.; Viveros-Ceballos, J. L. Synthesis 2012, 569–574. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1289680
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Reyes-González, M. A.; Zamudio-Medina, A.; Ordóñez, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 5756–5758. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.08.040
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  43. Reyes-González, M. Á.; Zamudio-Medina, Á.; Ramírez-Marroquín, O. A.; Ordóñez, M. Monatsh. Chem. 2014, 145, 1001–1007. doi:10.1007/s00706-013-1146-9
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  44. Muddala, M. P.; Nammalwar, B.; Bunce, R. A. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 28389–28393. doi:10.1039/c5ra02307f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  45. Yu, X.; Ding, Q.; Wu, J. J. Comb. Chem. 2010, 12, 743–746. doi:10.1021/cc100101a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Ali, T. E.; Abdel-Aziz, S. A.; El-Edfawy, S. M.; Mohamed, E.-H. A.; Abdel-Kariem, S. M. Heterocycles 2013, 87, 2513–2532. doi:10.3987/COM-13-12836
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  47. Sun, W.; Ding, Q.; Sun, X.; Fan, R.; Wu, J. J. Comb. Chem. 2007, 9, 690–694. doi:10.1021/cc070030z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Ding, Q.; Wang, B.; Wu, J. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 12166–12171. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2007.09.044
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  49. Ye, Y.; Ding, Q.; Wu, J. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 1378–1382. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2007.11.055
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  50. Bukšnaitienė, R.; Urbanaitė, A.; Čikotienė, I. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 6532–6553. doi:10.1021/jo501011u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  51. Borse, A. U.; Patil, N. L.; Patil, M. N.; Mail, R. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 6940–6942. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.10.030
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  52. Ye, S.; Zhou, H.; Wu, J. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 1294–1299. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.12.038
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  53. Ji, X.; Cai, L.; Yao, Z.; Fan, X.; Qi, S. Heteroat. Chem. 2010, 21, 89–95. doi:10.1002/hc.20573
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  54. Bhattacharya, A. K.; Rana, K. C.; Raut, D. S.; Mhaindarkar, V. P.; Khan, M. I. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 5407–5413. doi:10.1039/c0ob01102a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  55. Shaddy, A. A.; Kamel, A. A.; Abdou, W. M. Synth. Commun. 2013, 43, 236–252. doi:10.1080/00397911.2011.595603
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  56. Hosseini-Sarvari, M.; Tavakolian, M. New J. Chem. 2012, 36, 1014–1021. doi:10.1039/c2nj20947k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  57. Jayashree, P.; Shanthi, G.; Perumal, P. T. Synthesis 2009, 917–920. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1087960
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  58. Murthy, S. N.; Madhav, B.; Reddy, V. P.; Nageswar, Y. V. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 3649–3653. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.05.028
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  59. Gaikwad, D. S.; Undale, K. A.; Shaikh, T. S.; Pore, D. M. C. R. Chim. 2011, 14, 865–868. doi:10.1016/j.crci.2011.03.001
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  60. Das, B.; Balasubramanyam, P.; Reddy, G. C.; Salvanna, N. Helv. Chim. Acta 2011, 94, 1347–1350. doi:10.1002/hlca.201000461
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  61. Rajasekhar, M.; Rao, K. U. M.; Sundar, C. S.; Reddy, N. B.; Kumar Nayak, S. K.; Reddy, C. S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2012, 60, 854–858. doi:10.1248/cpb.c12-00160
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  62. Kolla, S. R.; Lee, Y. R. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 226–237. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2011.10.060
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  63. Kulkarni, M. A.; Pandurangi, V. R.; Desai, U. V.; Wadgaonkar, P. P. C. R. Chim. 2012, 15, 745–752. doi:10.1016/j.crci.2012.07.001
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  64. Elinson, M. N.; Nasybullin, R. F.; Nikishin, G. I. Heteroat. Chem. 2013, 24, 398–403. doi:10.1002/hc.21106
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  65. Kalla, R. M. N.; Byeon, S. J.; Heo, M. S.; Kim, I. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 10544–10551. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2013.10.052
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  66. Brahmachari, G.; Laskar, S. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2014, 189, 873–888. doi:10.1080/10426507.2014.903484
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  67. Kumaraswamy, G.; Raghu, N.; Kumar, R. S. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2014, 46, 435–443. doi:10.1080/00304948.2014.944403
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  68. Kalla, R. M. N.; Choi, J.-S.; Yoo, J.-W.; Byeon, S. J.; Heo, M. S.; Kim, I. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 76, 61–66. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.02.025
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  69. Dai, P.; Zha, G.; Lai, X.; Liu, W.; Gan, Q.; Shen, Y. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 63420–63424. doi:10.1039/c4ra09359c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  70. Sobhani, S.; Honarmand, M. Catal. Lett. 2013, 143, 476–485. doi:10.1007/s10562-013-0968-8
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  71. Mohammadi, R.; Kassaee, M. Z. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2013, 380, 152–158. doi:10.1016/j.molcata.2013.09.027
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  72. Tietze, L. F.; Kettschau, G. Top. Curr. Chem. 1997, 189, 1–120. doi:10.1007/BFb0119240
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  73. Al-Badri, H.; Maddaluno, J.; Masson, S.; Collignon, N. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 2255–2266. doi:10.1039/A903972D
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  74. Al-Badri, H.; Collignon, N.; Maddaluno, J.; Masson, S. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 3909–3919. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(00)00297-0
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  75. Zhou, H.; Jin, H.; Ye, S.; He, X.; Wu, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 4616–4618. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.05.106
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  76. Mumford, P. M.; Tarver, G. J.; Shipman, M. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3573–3575. doi:10.1021/jo9004958
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  77. Reddy, A. R.; Zhou, C.-Y.; Che, C.-M. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 1048–1051. doi:10.1021/ol4035098
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  78. Li, L.; Hao, G.; Zhu, A.; Fan, X.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, L. Chem. – Eur. J. 2013, 19, 14403–14406. doi:10.1002/chem.201303324
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  79. Azizian, J.; Ramazani, A.; Haji, M.; Azizkhani, V. Synth. Commun. 2011, 41, 3609–3619. doi:10.1080/00397911.2010.519094
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  80. Qiu, G.; Lu, Y.; Wu, J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 798–802. doi:10.1039/c2ob26979a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  81. Abás, S.; Estarellas, C.; Luque, F. J.; Escolano, C. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 2872–2881. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2015.03.065
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  82. Mohanan, K.; Martin, A. R.; Toupet, L.; Smietana, M.; Vasseur, J.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3196–3199. doi:10.1002/anie.200906781
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  83. Martin, A. R.; Mohanan, K.; Toupet, L.; Vasseur, J.-J.; Smietana, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 3184–3190. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201100167
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  84. Kumar, R.; Verma, D.; Mobin, S. M.; Namboothiri, I. N. N. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 4070–4073. doi:10.1021/ol301695e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  85. Ahamad, S.; Gupta, A. K.; Kant, R.; Mohanan, K. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 1492–1499. doi:10.1039/C4OB02365J
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  86. Meng, J.; Wu, D.; Shi, Y.; Yu, X.; Deng, W.-P. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 1074–1079. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2014.12.091
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  87. McEwen, W. E.; Cobb, R. L. Chem. Rev. 1955, 55, 511–549. doi:10.1021/cr50003a002
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  88. Spatz, D. M.; Popp, F. D. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1968, 5, 497–499. doi:10.1002/jhet.5570050409
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  89. Akiba, K.; Negishi, Y.; Inamoto, N. Synthesis 1979, 55–56. doi:10.1055/s-1979-28554
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  90. Akiba, K.; Negishi, Y.; Kurumaya, K.; Ueyama, N.; Inamoto, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 4977–4980. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)92396-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  91. Albouy, D.; Laspéras, M.; Etemad-Moghadam, G.; Koenig, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2311–2314. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(99)00189-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  92. Yavari, I.; Mirzaei, A.; Moradi, L. Synth. Commun. 2010, 40, 2407–2414. doi:10.1080/00397910903249598
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  93. Yavari, I.; Mirzaei, A.; Khalili, G. Helv. Chim. Acta 2010, 93, 654–658. doi:10.1002/hlca.200900247
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  94. Shaabani, A.; Sarvary, A.; Mousavi-Faraz, S.; Ng, S. W. Monatsh. Chem. 2012, 143, 1061–1065. doi:10.1007/s00706-011-0686-0
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  95. De Blieck, A.; Catak, S.; Debrouwer, W.; Drabowicz, J.; Hemelsoet, K.; Verstraelen, T.; Waroquier, M.; Van Speybroeck, V.; Stevens, C. V. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 1058–1067. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201201437
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  96. Van Assche, I.; Soroka, M.; Haemers, A.; Hooper, M.; Blanot, D.; van Heijenoort, J. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 26, 505–515. doi:10.1016/0223-5234(91)90146-E
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  97. Allais, C.; Constantieux, T.; Rodriguez, J. Chem. – Eur. J. 2009, 15, 12945–12948. doi:10.1002/chem.200902491
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  98. Attanasi, O. A.; Favi, G.; Mantellini, F.; Moscatelli, G.; Santeusanio, S. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 2860–2866. doi:10.1021/jo200287k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  99. Kaboudin, B.; Karami, L.; Kato, J.-y.; Aoyama, H.; Yokomatsu, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 4872–4875. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2013.06.129
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  100. Kumar, A.; Sharma, V.; Kaur, J.; Kumar, V.; Mahajan, S.; Kumar, N.; Chimni, S. S. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 7044–7049. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2014.06.013
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  101. Shen, Y.; Han, J.; Sun, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, J.; Deng, H.; Shao, M.; Shi, H.; Zhang, H.; Cao, W. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 4053–4060. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2015.04.067
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  102. Yavari, I.; Nematpour, M.; Hossaini, Z. Mol. Diversity 2010, 14, 617–620. doi:10.1007/s11030-009-9193-1
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities