Consecutive hydrazino-Ugi-azide reactions: synthesis of acylhydrazines bearing 1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles

  1. ,
  2. and
Laboratório de Química Metodológica e Orgânica Sintética, Instituto de Química, Universidade de Brasília, 70910-970, Brasília-DF, Brazil
  1. Corresponding author email
Associate Editor: T. P. Yoon
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 2596–2602. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.13.256
Received 28 Aug 2017, Accepted 14 Nov 2017, Published 05 Dec 2017
Full Research Paper
cc by logo

Abstract

Isocyanide-based multicomponent reactions (IMCRs) allow the construction of relatively complex molecules through a one-pot synthesis. The combination of IMCRs in a consecutive or sequential fashion further extends the complexity of the molecules obtained. Herein, we report the efficient application of this approach to the synthesis of acylhydrazines bearing 1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles. Our strategy was accomplished in only three steps: first, a one-pot hydrazino-Ugi-azide four-component reaction; second a hydrazinolysis and finally an additional hydrazino-Ugi-azide reaction. This sequence provides the title compounds in moderate to excellent yields. The products synthesized herein contain functional groups within their structures that can be easily modified to obtain new acylhydrazino 1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles.

Introduction

Tetrazoles are extensively studied, useful non-natural heterocyclic skeletons with the highest nitrogen content among the stable heterocycles [1,2]. The tetrazole-ring system has a variety of applications in organic chemistry, coordination chemistry, and agriculture and, in particular, it displays a wide range of biological properties such as analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, anticancer, among others [3-5].

The tetrazole nucleus most widely described in the literature is the 1,5-disubstituted tetrazole [6,7] because it presents a wide range of pharmacological activities. For instance, cilostazol (anti-inflammatory), pentylenetetrazol (circulatory and respiratory stimulant) and nojiritetrazole (antidiabetic) are drugs containing the 1,5-disubstituted tetrazole nucleus, along with the pharmaceutically important tetrazoles losartan and valsartan, which are used as angiotensin receptor blockers (Figure 1) [8].

[1860-5397-13-256-1]

Figure 1: Tetrazole-containing drugs.

In recent years, the synthesis of 1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles has attracted the attention of several research groups around the world not only for their important pharmacological activities but also for being an excellent mimic of the cis-amide bond. Furthermore, they can be used to pre-organize the amide bonds of peptides [9].

Most methods for the synthesis of tetrazoles have limitations that include multistep syntheses of starting materials and/or the use of expensive reagents. The most commonly used synthesis of 1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles are intermolecular cycloaddition reactions and isocyanide-based multicomponent reactions (IMCRs). Indeed, the Ugi-multicomponent reaction using TMSN3 (trimethylsilyl azide) as acid component, originally reported by Ugi in 1961 [10], is one of the best and most general methods for the synthesis of 1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles due to the intrinsic generation of molecular diversity [11-15]. As the Ugi reaction also requires an amine component, we envisaged that reactions of hydrazino compounds (RNHNH2) with TMSN3 could furnish useful compounds bearing both the hydrazino and the tetrazole moieties.

The term ‘hydrazino-Ugi’ was first proposed for the synthesis of hydrazinopeptides [16] in 2010. The application of consecutive hydrazino-Ugi reactions has also been described in the literature [17]. Besides this, the introduction of the hydrazino group into several classes of compounds presents several advantages. For instance, hydrazinopeptides comprise a class of peptidomimetics with promising biological and conformational activities [18-21]. It is worth mentioning that in such compounds the so-called "hydrazino-turns" are formed through intramolecular hydrogen bonding between the hydrazino groups. The resulting unique secondary structures can improve the proteolytic stability of these compounds [22]. An acylhydrazine (hydrazide) was first reported in Ugi reactions back in 1961 [23] and also some natural products contain this moiety, such as the vitamin B6 antagonist linatine [24] and the antibiotic negamycin, active against Gram-negative bacteria [25], among others [26]. Furthermore, trisubstituted acylhydrazines were found to serve as tertiary amide bioisosters [27]. Therefore, it is highly desirable to have a method that allows an easy incorporation of hydrazino groups into more complex molecules. In this respect, Dömling et al. have recently described the synthesis of α-hydrazino amides using N-hydroxyimides as the acid component in Ugi reactions [28].

As part of our continuing efforts in using consecutive multicomponent reactions to obtain novel molecules in a reduced number of steps [29-31], herein we describe a concise and efficient strategy for the synthesis of acylhydrazino bistetrazoles through hydrazino-Ugi-azide reactions in only three steps. During the course of our work, Dömling et al. reported the synthesis of hydrazinotetrazoles through a different approach focused on their postcyclization strategy [32].

Results and Discussion

Two multicomponent reactions were used for the synthesis of acylhydrazino bis(1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles) as outlined in Scheme 1. The approach presented here is initially based on a hydrazino-Ugi-azide reaction, followed by a hydrazinolysis step and a second hydrazine-Ugi-azide reaction to provide the desired acylhydrazino bis(1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles). Recently we have reported the synthesis of acylhydrazino-peptomers by a similar strategy [31].

[1860-5397-13-256-i1]

Scheme 1: Synthesis of acylhydrazino bis(1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles) through two hydrazino-Ugi-azide reactions and a hydrazinolysis step.

The hydrazides 2a–c were prepared by the reaction of esters 1, 4 and 6 with hydrazine monohydrate, following a known procedure (Scheme 2) [31].

[1860-5397-13-256-i2]

Scheme 2: Synthesis of hydrazides 2ac. Reagents and conditions: (i) N2H4·H2O, EtOH, reflux, 2–3 h; (ii) CH3I, NaHCO3, DMF, rt, 46 h; (iii) (Boc)2O, NaOH, dioxane/H2O, overnight [31].

To access the acylhydrazino-tetrazoles, the hydrazides 2ac were subjected to a multicomponent reaction comprising an aldehyde or ketone 7ah, trimethylsilyl azide (TMSN3, 8), methyl isocyanoacetate (9) and ZnCl2 (10 mol %) in trifluoroethanol (TFE) at room temperature for 24 h. The presence of catalytic amounts of zinc chloride as Lewis acid in this reaction had already been reported to improve the yields [33]. Indeed, initial studies without the catalyst afforded the desired products 10a in only 28% yield (120 °C, 30 min, MW, TFE) and 10j in 68% yield (rt, 24 h, TFE). As solvent, TFE was found to be the best choice for the reactions. The results summarized in Scheme 3 show that various ketones and aldehydes generated the respective products under the optimized conditions when acetyl hydrazide (2a) was employed, albeit in moderate yields (30–53%). Nevertheless, the yields were considerably higher for Cbz-glycine hydrazide (2b) and Boc-glycine hydrazide (2c) when compared to 2a (Scheme 4).

[1860-5397-13-256-i3]

Scheme 3: Synthesis of acylhydrazino 1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles 10ah through multicomponent reactions involving 2a.

[1860-5397-13-256-i4]

Scheme 4: Synthesis of acylhydrazino 1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles 10im through multicomponent reactions involving 2b or 2c.

Next, a second hydrazino-Ugi-azide reaction was carried out to obtain the acylhydrazino bistetrazoles. For this purpose, we chose hydrazine tetrazole 10j to continue the synthesis, as it was obtained in excellent yield, it shows distinct NMR spectra and offers the possibility of further functionalization after removal of the Boc protecting group. Therefore, compound 10j was subjected to hydrazinolysis with hydrazine monohydrate as already described to give the corresponding hydrazide 11 (Scheme 5). The latter compound was then subjected to the hydrazine-Ugi-azide reaction with different ketones, to yield the corresponding acylhydrazino bis(1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles) 12ad in moderate to good yields (45–70%). At this stage, only symmetrical ketones were used to facilitate the product characterization by NMR analysis. Indeed the 1H and 13C NMR spectra were in full agreement with the proposed structures. Of note are the characteristic C=N tetrazole resonances that are observed between 155–158 ppm in the 13C NMR spectra. In addition, HRMS data supported the product structures.

[1860-5397-13-256-i5]

Scheme 5: Synthesis of acylhydrazino bis(1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles) 12ad.

The obtained acylhydrazino bis(1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles) 12ad can be further functionalized on either or both termini after ester cleavage and/or Boc deprotection. So, further Ugi/Ugi-azide reactions allow elongating the acylhydrazino bis(1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles) main chain (Scheme 6). For instance, the ester terminus can be submitted to another hydrazinolysis to install a new tetrazole nucleus after an Ugi-azide reaction.

[1860-5397-13-256-i6]

Scheme 6: Possible postmodification reactions of the acylhydrazino bis(1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles) 12ad.

Conclusion

In summary, the approach developed herein allows the synthesis of a wide range of hydrazino bis(1,5-disubstituted tetrazoles) in only three steps. The procedure offers several advantages, such as high atom-economy, a simple synthetic procedure with an easy work-up and ready access to highly functionalized compounds in a low number of steps. In addition, the obtained compounds allow further modification reactions.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Detailed experimental procedures, NMR and mass spectra.
Format: PDF Size: 2.2 MB Download

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Instituto de Química, Universidade de Brasília, CAPES and CNPq for financial support.

References

  1. Himo, F.; Demko, Z. P.; Noodleman, L. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9076–9080. doi:10.1021/jo030137i
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Upadhayaya, R. S.; Sinha, N.; Jain, S.; Kishore, N.; Chandra, R.; Arora, S. K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 2225–2228. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2004.02.014
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Bavetsias, V.; Marriott, J. H.; Melin, C.; Kimbell, R.; Matusiak, Z. S.; Boyle, F. T.; Jackman, A. L. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 1910–1926. doi:10.1021/jm991119p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Powers, R. A.; Shoichet, B. K. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 3222–3234. doi:10.1021/jm020002p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Rajasekaran, A.; Thampi, P. P. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 39, 273–279. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2003.11.016
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Katritzky, A. R.; Cai, C.; Meher, N. K. Synthesis 2007, 1204–1208. doi:10.1055/s-2007-966001
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Romagnoli, R.; Baraldi, P. G.; Salvador, M. K.; Preti, D.; Aghazadeh Tabrizi, M.; Brancale, A.; Fu, X.-H.; Li, J.; Zhang, S.-Z.; Hamel, E.; Bortolozzi, R.; Basso, G.; Viola, G. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 475–488. doi:10.1021/jm2013979
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Hanessian, S.; Deschênes-Simard, B.; Simard, D.; Chenel, C.; Haak, E.; Bulat, V. Pure Appl. Chem. 2010, 82, 1761–1771. doi:10.1351/PAC-CON-09-08-08
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. May, B. C. H.; Abell, A. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5641–5644. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)01101-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Ugi, I.; Steinbrückner, C. Chem. Ber. 1961, 94, 734–742. doi:10.1002/cber.19610940323
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Ugi, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1962, 1, 8–21. doi:10.1002/anie.196200081
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Nixey, T.; Kelly, M.; Hulme, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 8729–8733. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)01563-X
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Patil, P.; Kurpiewska, K.; Kalinowska-Tłuścik, J.; Dömling, A. ACS Comb. Sci. 2017, 19, 343–350. doi:10.1021/acscombsci.7b00033
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Nikbakht, A.; Ramezanpour, S.; Balalaie, S.; Rominger, F. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 6790–6795. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2015.07.037
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Maleki, A.; Sarvary, A. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 60938–60955. doi:10.1039/C5RA11531K
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Krasavin, M.; Bushkova, E.; Parchinsky, V.; Shumsky, A. Synthesis 2010, 933–942. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1219274
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Bushkova, E.; Parchinsky, V.; Krasavin, M. Mol. Diversity 2010, 14, 493–499. doi:10.1007/s11030-009-9200-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Bordessa, A.; Keita, M.; Maréchal, X.; Formicola, L.; Lagarde, N.; Rodrigo, J.; Bernadat, G.; Bauvais, C.; Soulier, J.-L.; Dufau, L.; Milcent, T.; Crousse, B.; Reboud-Ravaux, M.; Ongeri, S. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 70, 505–524. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.09.059
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Laurencin, M.; Legrand, B.; Duval, E.; Henry, J.; Baudy-Floc'h, M.; Zatylny-Gaudin, C.; Bondon, A. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 2025–2034. doi:10.1021/jm2011595
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Lakontseva, E.; Krasavin, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 4095–4099. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.05.133
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Suć, J.; Jerić, I. SpringerPlus 2015, 4, 507. doi:10.1186/s40064-015-1288-9
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Acherar, S.; Salaün, A.; Le Grel, P.; Le Grel, B.; Jamart-Grégoire, B. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 5603–5613. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201300567
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Ugi, I.; Bodesheim, F. Chem. Ber. 1961, 94, 2797–2801. doi:10.1002/cber.19610941031
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Klosterman, H. J.; Lamoureux, G. L.; Parsons, J. L. Biochemistry 1967, 6, 170–177. doi:10.1021/bi00853a028
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. McKinney, D. C.; Basarab, G. S.; Cocozaki, A. I.; Foulk, M. A.; Miller, M. D.; Ruvinsky, A. M.; Scott, C. W.; Thakur, K.; Zhao, L.; Buurman, E. T.; Narayan, S. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 930–935. doi:10.1021/acsmedchemlett.5b00205
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Tanzawa, K.; Ishii, M.; Ogita, T.; Shimada, K. J. Antibiot. 1992, 45, 1733–1737. doi:10.7164/antibiotics.45.1733
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Canales, E.; Carlson, J. S.; Appleby, T.; Fenaux, M.; Lee, J.; Tian, Y.; Tirunagari, N.; Wong, M.; Watkins, W. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 4288–4292. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.05.025
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Chandgude, A. L.; Dömling, A. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 1228–1231. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00205
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Vercillo, O. E.; Andrade, C. K. Z.; Wessjohann, L. A. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 205–208. doi:10.1021/ol702521g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Barreto, A. F. S.; Vercillo, O. E.; Wessjohann, L. A.; Andrade, C. K. Z. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 1017–1022. doi:10.3762/bjoc.10.101
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Barreto, A. F. S.; dos Santos, V. A.; Andrade, C. K. Z. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 2865–2872. doi:10.3762/bjoc.12.285
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  32. Wang, Y.; Patil, P.; Kurpiewska, K.; Kalinowska-Tluscik, J.; Dömling, A. ACS Comb. Sci. 2017, 19, 193–198. doi:10.1021/acscombsci.7b00009
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Patil, P.; Zhang, J.; Kurpiewska, K.; Kalinowska-Tłuścik, J.; Dömling, A. Synthesis 2016, 48, 1122–1130. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1561353
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities