Synthesis and SAR of the antistaphylococcal natural product nematophin from Xenorhabdus nematophila

  1. 1,2 ORCID Logo ,
  2. 1,3,4 ,
  3. 5 and
  4. 1,6,§ ORCID Logo
1Molekulare Biotechnologie, Goethe University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, D-60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
2present address: Respiratory, Inflammation and Autoimmunity, Innovative Medicines and Early Development, Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, Mölndal 43183, Sweden
3present address: Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases, Innovative Medicines and Early Development, Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, Mölndal 43183, Sweden
  1. Corresponding author email
§ Phone: 0049-69-798-29557
Associate Editor: J. S. Dickschat
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019, 15, 535–541.
Received 05 Nov 2018, Accepted 13 Feb 2019, Published 25 Feb 2019
Full Research Paper
cc by logo


The repeated and improper use of antibiotics had led to an increased number of multiresistant bacteria. Therefore, new lead structures are needed. Here, the synthesis and an expanded structure–activity relationship of the simple and antistaphylococcal amide nematophin from Xenorhabdus nematophila and synthetic derivatives are described. Moreover, the synthesis of intrinsic fluorescent derivatives, incorporating azaindole moieties was achieved for the first time.


Microorganisms present a rich source of bioactive natural products of pharmacological importance against an emerging number of multiresistant bacteria [1]. Such examples are Xenorhabdus sp., Gram-negative entomopathogenic bacteria which live in symbiosis with soil-living nematodes of the genera Steinernema [2,3]. During a complex life cycle the nematode–bacteria pair infects and kills insect larvae, whereby Xenorhabdus produce a broad range of natural products with antimicrobial properties [4-8]. As the Steinernema–Xenorhabdus complex is not pathogenic against humans, they are widely used as biocontrol agents in agriculture [9].

Natural products produced by bacteria play an important role in the bacteria/nematode/insect life cycle and most natural products are non-ribosomal peptides (NRP), e.g., rhabdopeptides [10,11] and polyketide–NRP hybrids, like xenocoumacins [12,13]. The quite simple amide nematophin (1) is another well-known member of natural products common in all Xenorhabdus nematophila strains and was first described by Li et al. in 1997 for their antimicrobial properties [14]. Simply, 1 is the condensation product of 3-methyl-2-oxopentanoic acid and tryptamine and showed good activities against different Gram-positive pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) comparable with activities of vancomycin. Recently, the biosynthesis of 1 was elucidated by our group as well as the 2-phenylethylamine derivative 2 with an α-keto amide moiety, which could be identified upon heterologous expression of the appropriate gene cluster in E. coli [15]. Moreover, elongated nematophin derivatives, namely nevaltophins from Xenorhabdus PB62.4, were described incorporating an additional valine. As 1 and nevaltophines act as prophenoloxidase activators, it is suggested that they have a specific role in the bacteria/nematode/insect symbiosis.

Little or nothing is known about the mode of action of this simple amide against S. aureus. Structure–bioactivity studies revealed that the α-keto moiety and the amide moiety itself are required for bioactivity [16]. These findings suggest a specific interaction of this electrophilic moiety with a nucleophile. Such an interaction was previously reported for the macrocyclic peptide cyclotheonamide A, isolated from marine sponge Theonella sp. Cyclotheonamide A is described as a potent inhibitor of various proteases, in particular trypsin and thrombin [17-19]. Hereby, the α-keto amide covalently binds to the serine oxygen in the active site under formation of a stable tetrahedral hemiketal. Furthermore, substitution of the indole hydrogen by alkyl, aryl or benzyl improves the in vitro antistaphylococcal activity. In contrast, the incorporation of smaller heterocycles like pyridine and imidazole as well as isosteric benzimidazole instead of the indole moieties lead to a loss of antibacterial activity. Kennedy et al. could synthesize a 2-phenyl derivative that showed nanomolar activity against S. aureus [20]. To the detriment of this compound class, all derivatives lose their antibacterial activity in the presence of serum in vitro in serial broth and agar dilution method [16,20]. Even with the use of charged groups as modifiers, serum-protein binding could not be avoided. However, we were interested in expanding the aforementioned structure–activity studies regarding the substitution of the indole moiety by different aromatic systems as well as substitution of side chains in the α-keto carboxylic acids to generate more derivatives of this fascinating small and bioactive amide.

Results and Discussion

We first synthesized 1 and 1-methylnematophin (3) as standards to confirm preliminary results. We then initiated the synthesis of derivatives 2, and 412. Briefly, the appropriate α-keto carboxylic acid was coupled to the respective amine. Amide bond formation was achieved using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC·HCl), 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) in DMF under microwave irradiation (Scheme 1). Racemic 1 was synthesized using tryptamine and (rac)-3-methyl-2-oxopentanoic acid. Similarly, compounds 27 were synthesized using different amines including 2-phenylethylamine (for 2), 1-methyltryptamine (for 3), 2-(2-naphthyl)ethylamine hydrochloride (for 4), 2-(1-naphthyl)ethylamine hydrochloride (for 5), 2-(1H-inden-3-yl)ethylamine hydrobromide (for 6) [21], and 2-(1-benzofuran-3-yl)ethylamine (for 7), respectively. Compounds 812 were synthesized by coupling tryptamine with different α-keto carboxylic acids, including 3-furylglyoxylic acid (for 8), 3-indoleglyoxylic acid (for 9), phenylglyoxylic acid (for 10), and isomeric 3-methylpent-2-enoic acid (for 11 and 12) [22], respectively. Compounds 11 and 12 were separated during the isolation process and initially constructed to enable target identification. Compounds 11 and 12 might act as Michael acceptor (α,β-unsaturated carbonyl) and attach irreversibly and covalently to a potential target [23]. After purification and characterization, the above mentioned compounds were tested against different pathogenic strains, i.e., methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), Enterococcus faecalis, and Micrococcus luteus. The yields and bioactivities are summarized in Table 1 (and Table S1, Supporting Information File 1).


Scheme 1: General procedure for the synthesis of nematophin and related derivatives. i) 1.5 equiv α-keto carboxylic acid, 1.0 equiv amine, 1.5 equiv EDC·HCl, 1.5 equiv HOBt, 2.0 equiv DIPEA in DMF (c 0.1 M), 25 W, 75 °C, 20 min.

Table 1: Summary of synthesized nematophin derivatives (112) and their bioactivity (MIC in µg/mL) against S. aureus (MSSA and MRSA).

    MIC (µg/mL)b
structure yielda S. aureus (MSSA)
ATCC 29213
ATCC 43300
[Graphic 1]
46% 0.5 0.5
[Graphic 2]
56% 16 32
[Graphic 3]
74% 0.125 0.031
[Graphic 4]
48% 2 4
[Graphic 5]
70% 1 4
[Graphic 6]
26% 1 1
[Graphic 7]
54% >128 >128
[Graphic 8]
59% 64 >64
[Graphic 9]
84% >64 >64
[Graphic 10]
47% 8 8
[Graphic 11]
59%c >128 >128
[Graphic 12]
59%c >128 >128

aPurification using column chromatography on silica gel. bMedian of three experiments. cDerivatives were synthesized using an isomeric mixture of 3-methylpent-2-enoic acid.

As previously described, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 1 improves by alkylation of the indole moiety as seen for 3 [16] even 1 and 3 show a good activity against MRSA. Although for all other tested compounds no better activity than that of the original natural product 1 was observed, 6 showed an activity comparable to 1 against MRSA. Since only a slight activity could be observed for some compounds against additionally tested bacteria, i.e., M. luteus ATCC 9431 and E. faecalis ATCC 29212, a staphylococcal-specific target is suggested. All derivatives with α-keto-β-methylvaleric moiety (17) were active against S. aureus. Substitution of the side chain in the α-keto amide significantly affects the bioactivity, as seen for compounds 8, 9 and 10. Furthermore, attempts to identify a possible target by the incorporation of an α,β-unsaturated carbonyl moiety, as it should bind irreversible to a potential target, instead of the α-keto amide in 11 and 12 are stalled as it led to a complete loss of bioactivity.

To the best of our knowledge, no one has ever tried to incorporate azaindole moieties in small natural products and tried to use them for fluorescence imaging. This approach may circumvent the above-mentioned impasse and should allow at least localization studies in S. aureus cells. Azaindoles are isosteric to indole, whereas one of the endocyclic methines is substituted with nitrogen, and thus leads to an increased and red-shifted fluorescence [24-26]. Budisa and co-workers have already used azatryptophans to study proteins with intrinsic green and blue fluorescence [27,28]. The azaindole moiety allows a linker-less incorporation of a fluorescent label with minimal disturbance.

Therefore, four fluorescent derivatives of nematophin were designed and their synthesis initiated. The syntheses of the appropriate azatryptamine derivatives (17, 18, 25, and 26) were achieved from the non-expensive and commercially available 4- and 7-azaindole (13 and 20), respectively. First, 13 and 20 were converted in a Friedel–Crafts acylation with chloroacetyl chloride (ClCH2COCl) and aluminium chloride (AlCl3) in DCM to give compounds 14 and 21. Subsequent reduction was achieved with triethylsilane (Et3SiH) in TFA to give 15 and 22. For the synthesis of the primary amine, halides 15 and 22 were converted in a Gabriel synthesis with potassium phthalimide in DMF to the appropriate phthalimides 16 and 23 [29]. These intermediary compounds 16 and 23 also allowed an N-methylation of the azaindole moiety with sodium hydride (NaH) and methyl iodide (MeI) to yield 17 and 24. By ethanolic hydrazinolysis and microwave irradiation the phthalimides (16, 17, 23, and 24) were deprotected yielding the desired primary amines in good yields (18, 19, 25, and 26) (Scheme 2 and Scheme 3). With all building blocks available, the synthesis of the appropriate fluorescent derivatives was performed as before, using (rac)-3-methyl-2-oxopentanoic acid. Yields after coupling and bioactivities are summarized in Table 2.


Scheme 2: Synthesis of azatryptamines (4-azatryptamine (4ATRA) and 1-methyl-4-azatryptamine (1M4ATRA)). i) 5.0 equiv AlCl3, 5.0 equiv chloroacetyl chloride in DCM, overnight, rt 67%; ii) 7.0 equiv Et3SiH in TFA, overnight, rt, 93%; iii) 1.1 equiv potassium phthalimide, in DMF, 100 °C, 21%; iv) 1.2 equiv NaH, 1.0 equiv MeI in DMF, overnight, rt, 62%; v) 5.0 equiv N2H4·H2O in EtOH, 90 °C, 2 h, 25 W, 99% to quant.


Scheme 3: Synthesis of azatryptamines (7-azatryptamine (7ATRA) and 1-methyl-7-azatryptamine (1M7ATRA)). i) 5.0 equiv AlCl3, 5.0 equiv ClCH2COCl in DCM, overnight, rt 32%; ii) 7.0 equiv Et3SiH in TFA, overnight, rt, 93%; iii) 1.1 equiv potassium phthalimide, in DMF, 100 °C, 56%; iv) 1.2 equiv NaH, 1.0 equiv MeI in DMF, overnight, rt, 57%; v) 5.0 equiv N2H4·H2O in EtOH, 2 h, 90 °C, 25 W, 92% to quant.

Table 2: Summary of synthesized nematophin derivatives (2730) and their bioactivity (MIC in µg/mL) against S. aureus (MSSA and MRSA).

    MIC (µg/mL)b
structure yielda S. aureus (MSSA)
ATCC 29213
ATCC 43300
[Graphic 13]
32% 32 64
[Graphic 14]
16% 16 >128
[Graphic 15]
72% 16 64
[Graphic 16]
28% 4 32

aPurification using column chromatography on silica gel. bMedian of three experiments.

Whereas the biological data, for example against S. aureus or MRSA shows a decreased activity for all azaindole derivatives (compare 1 with 27 or 28) as observed for isosteric benzimidazoles [20], an increased activity for all methylated derivatives (compare pairs of 1/3, 27/28, and 29/30) could be observed for at least MSSA. This observation may correlate to the molecular polarity, and thus hydrophilicity of the cyclic moiety, whereas almost all hydrophobic moieties showed good antistaphylococcal activity as seen for naphthyl (4 and 5) and indene (6). However, the increase of hydrophobicity influences the passive membrane diffusion and therefore might influence how the compounds get to their actual target [30]. Moreover, a specific minimal size of the cyclic moiety must be fulfilled as, e.g., 2 with a phenyl moiety is less active in vitro.


Despite their lower bioactivities, the azaindole derivatives are currently under investigation upon their use for fluorescence imaging. Furthermore, derivatives 3 and 6 will be further studied for identification of their actual target in S. aureus. This could be a serine protease that can also be addressed in the future by more stable compounds. Moreover, it might be possible to use nematophin and its derivatives for topical treatment of S. aureus infections.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: General procedure, supplemantary table and NMR spectra.
Format: PDF Size: 4.2 MB Download


We thank Denia Frank for excellent technical support. This work was supported by the LOEWE program of the state of Hesse as part of the MegaSyn research cluster to H.B.B.


  1. Li, J. W.-H.; Vederas, J. C. Science 2009, 325, 161–165. doi:10.1126/science.1168243
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Herbert, E. E.; Goodrich-Blair, H. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, 634–646. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1706
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Goodrich-Blair, H.; Clarke, D. J. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 64, 260–268. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05671.x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Shi, Y.-M.; Bode, H. B. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2018, 35, 309–335. doi:10.1039/c7np00054e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Vizcaino, M. I.; Guo, X.; Crawford, J. M. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 41, 285–299. doi:10.1007/s10295-013-1356-5
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Klassen, J. L. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2014, 4, 15–22. doi:10.1016/j.cois.2014.08.004
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Challinor, V. L.; Bode, H. B. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2015, 1354, 82–97. doi:10.1111/nyas.12954
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Crawford, J. M.; Portmann, C.; Zhang, X.; Roeffaers, M. B. J.; Clardy, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 10821–10826. doi:10.1073/pnas.1201160109
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Shapiro-Ilan, D. I.; Gouge, D. H.; Koppenhöfer, A. M. Factors affecting commercial success: case studies in cotton, turf and citrus.. In Entomopathogenic nematology; Gaugler, R., Ed.; CABI: Wallingford, 2002; pp 333–355. doi:10.1079/9780851995670.0333
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Cai, X.; Nowak, S.; Wesche, F.; Bischoff, I.; Kaiser, M.; Fürst, R.; Bode, H. B. Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 379–386. doi:10.1038/nchem.2671
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Reimer, D.; Cowles, K. N.; Proschak, A.; Nollmann, F. I.; Dowling, A. J.; Kaiser, M.; ffrench-Constant, R.; Goodrich-Blair, H.; Bode, H. B. ChemBioChem 2013, 14, 1991–1997. doi:10.1002/cbic.201300205
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Reimer, D.; Luxenburger, E.; Brachmann, A. O.; Bode, H. B. ChemBioChem 2009, 10, 1997–2001. doi:10.1002/cbic.200900187
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. McInerney, B. V.; Taylor, W. C.; Lacey, M. J.; Akhurst, R. J.; Gregson, R. P. J. Nat. Prod. 1991, 54, 785–795. doi:10.1021/np50075a006
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Li, J.; Chen, G.; Webster, J. M. Can. J. Microbiol. 1997, 43, 770–773. doi:10.1139/m97-110
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Cai, X.; Challinor, V. L.; Zhao, L.; Reimer, D.; Adihou, H.; Grün, P.; Kaiser, M.; Bode, H. B. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 806–809. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03796
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Himmler, T.; Pirro, F.; Schmeer, N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 2045–2050. doi:10.1016/s0960-894x(98)00358-8
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  17. Lee, A. Y.; Hagihara, M.; Karmacharya, R.; Albers, M. W.; Schreiber, S. L.; Clardy, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 12619–12620. doi:10.1021/ja00079a065
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Maryanoff, B. E.; Qiu, X.; Padmanabhan, K. P.; Tulinsky, A.; Almond, H. R.; Andrade-Gordon, P.; Greco, M. N.; Kauffman, J. A.; Nicolaou, K. C.; Liu, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1993, 90, 8048–8052. doi:10.1073/pnas.90.17.8048
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Fusetani, N.; Matsunaga, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Takebayashi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7053–7054. doi:10.1021/ja00175a045
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Kennedy, G.; Viziano, M.; Winders, J. A.; Cavallini, P.; Gevi, M.; Micheli, F.; Rodegher, P.; Seneci, P.; Zumerle, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 1751–1754. doi:10.1016/s0960-894x(00)00331-0
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  21. Liu, S.; Motta, A.; Delferro, M.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 8830–8833. doi:10.1021/ja4039505
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Tiseni, P. S.; Peters, R. Chem. – Eur. J. 2010, 16, 2503–2517. doi:10.1002/chem.200902896
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Gersch, M.; Kreuzer, J.; Sieber, S. A. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012, 29, 659–682. doi:10.1039/c2np20012k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Chen, Y.; Rich, R. L.; Gai, F.; Petrich, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 1770–1780. doi:10.1021/j100111a011
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Cash, M. T.; Schreiner, P. R.; Phillips, R. S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 3701–3706. doi:10.1039/b506652b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Carnerero, J. M.; González-Benjumea, A.; Carmona, C.; Balón, M. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 2012, 97, 1072–1078. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2012.07.099
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Lepthien, S.; Hoesl, M. G.; Merkel, L.; Budisa, N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105, 16095–16100. doi:10.1073/pnas.0802804105
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Hoesl, M. G.; Larregola, M.; Cui, H.; Budisa, N. J. Pept. Sci. 2010, 16, 589–595. doi:10.1002/psc.1263
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Osby, J. O.; Martin, M. G.; Ganem, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 2093–2096. doi:10.1016/s0040-4039(01)81169-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Veber, D. F.; Johnson, S. R.; Cheng, H.-Y.; Smith, B. R.; Ward, K. W.; Kopple, K. D. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2615–2623. doi:10.1021/jm020017n
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities