Tetraphenylethylene-embedded pillar[5]arene-based orthogonal self-assembly for efficient photocatalysis in water

  1. ,
  2. ,
  3. ,
  4. ,
  5. and
  6. ORCID Logo
College of Materials Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, P. R. China
  1. Corresponding author email
Guest Editor: C. Gaeta
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2022, 18, 429–437. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.18.45
Received 28 Jan 2022, Accepted 04 Apr 2022, Published 13 Apr 2022
Full Research Paper
cc by logo


Herein, we have designed and fabricated a simple and efficient supramolecular self-assembled nanosystem based on host–guest interactions between water-soluble tetraphenylethylene-embedded pillar[5]arene (m-TPEWP5) and ammonium benzoyl-ʟ-alaninate (G) in an aqueous medium. The obtained assembly of m-TPEWP5 and G showed aggregation-induced emission (AIE) via the blocking of intramolecular phenyl-ring rotations and functioned as an ideal donor. After the loading of eosin Y (EsY) as acceptor on the surface of the assembly of m-TPEWP5 and G, the worm-like nanostructures changed into nanorods, which facilitates a Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) from the m-TPEWP5 and G assembled donor to the EsY acceptor present in the nanorod assembly. The system comprising m-TPEWP5, G and EsY displayed moderate FRET efficiency (31%) at a 2:1 molar ratio of donor-to-acceptor. Moreover, the obtained supramolecular nanorod assembly could act as a nanoreactor mimicking natural photosynthesis and exhibited a high catalytic efficiency for the photocatalytic dehalogenation reaction of various bromoketone derivatives with good yields in short reaction time in water.


Photosynthesis is one of the most significant processes in nature, which balances the energy level in living systems [1-3]. In particular, green plants absorb photons of light and convert them into another form of energy through photosynthesis similar to solar power factories, containing many manufacturing units called chloroplasts. Briefly, the antenna molecules capture the light energy by using protein–pigment complexes and transfer it to the specialized reaction centers via the FRET process, where the excited state energy is transferred into useable chemical energy [4-6]. Mainly, both antenna molecules and proteins on the thylakoid membrane are combined to form a light-harvesting system through noncovalent interactions. Inspired by photosynthesis, extensive research has been devoted to construct energy transfer systems for the better utilization of solar energy [7]. In general, an effective supramolecular donor–acceptor system was employed to construct a photocatalytic system using FRET [6,8]. To fabricate a successful FRET system, the following key points need to be considered, i) the acceptor absorption spectrum should have good overlapping with the donor emission spectrum; ii) the distance between the donor and an acceptor should be within 10 nm; iii) dipoles of the donor and acceptor molecules must be adopted constructively vicinity to each other [9]. These fundamental criteria provide a wonderful approach for the construction of supramolecular photocatalytic systems by self-assembly strategies [10,11].

Recently, FRET-based supramolecular self-assembled systems [12,13] as nanoreactors for various photocatalytic reactions have received significant attention from the supramolecular community because of their robust molecular design and tunable self-assembly, such as vesicles [14-16], micelles [17-19], nanocrystals [20], coordination-driven assemblies [9,21,22], host–guest interactions [15,23-25], etc. In the above systems, catalysts are encapsulated by supramolecular assemblies and thus provide a suitable environment to improve the efficiency of chemical reactions in water [26]. Until now, various macrocyclic host-assisted supramolecular donor–acceptor systems have been developed based on the FRET process and further utilized for different photochemical reactions [27,28]. For instance, Yi et al. [29] developed a supramolecular assembly with a two-step FRET process by the utilization of a metallacycle-tetraphenylethylene (TPE) donor and eosin Y (EsY) and sulforhodamine (SR101) as first and second acceptors, respectively. The resulting supramolecular energy transfer system was applied to the alkylation of C–H bonds via a photochemical catalytic reaction in aqueous medium. In addition, our group [30] reported the construction of a supramolecular photocatalytic system with a two-step FRET process through the supramolecular assembly of water-soluble pillar[5]arene and TPE derivatives as donor and EsY and Nile Red (NiR) as acceptors. The obtained vesicles could be utilized as a nanoreactor for photocatalyzed dehalogenation reactions in water. However, the above reported supramolecular nanosystem requires a long time to produce the dehalogenated product with high yield. Therefore, the development of a potential nanoreactor for dehalogenation reaction with high yields within shorter reaction time is vastly essential and of industrial importance.

Herein, we have fabricated a supramolecular AIE-emissive photocatalytic system (m-TPEWP5[Graphic 1]G–EsY) based on the host–guest interactions between meso-TPE embedded water-soluble pillar[5]arene (m-TPEWP5) as host and the guest ammonium benzoyl-ʟ-alaninate (G) forming the m-TPEWP5[Graphic 2]G complex onto which EsY was loaded to achieve moderate FRET efficiency in water (Scheme 1). When the guest G was added to the host m-TPEWP5 a stable host–guest complex formed, which strongly inhibited the intramolecular phenyl-ring rotations thus enhancing the AIE property. The resulting m-TPEWP5[Graphic 3]G self-assembled worm-like nanosystem acts as an ideal donor and loading EsY as acceptor on the surface of the worm-like nanostructure, leads to the generation of a nanorod assembly via electrostatic interactions. The final AIE-emissive m-TPEWP5[Graphic 4]G-EsY self-assembled FRET system could be employed to promote the photocatalyzed dehalogenation of various haloketone derivatives with excellent yields in water.


Scheme 1: Graphical representation of the fabrication of supramolecular m-TPEWP5[Graphic 5]G-EsY self-assembled photocatalytic system.

Results and Discussion

The m-TPEWP5 host and ammonium benzoyl-ʟ-alaninate (G) were synthesized according to our previous work [31,32] and their detailed synthetic routes and characterization data are provided in Supporting Information File 1 (Figure S1). Since m-TPEWP5 and G have good solubility in water, therefore, the m-TPEWP5[Graphic 6]G and m-TPEWP5[Graphic 7]G-EsY supramolecular assemblies could be potentially fabricated in an aqueous solution. Before studying the FRET process, we firstly investigated the host–guest interactions between m-TPEWP5 and G in D2O. Upon the addition of G (1 equiv) to m-TPEWP5, the resonance peaks of G containing Ha and Hb protons shifted to the upfield region in the NMR scale (Figure 1). Meanwhile, the m-TPEWP5 aromatic H1 proton signal shifted to the downfield region, displaying that the guest molecule has a good binding affinity with the m-TPEWP5 host to form a stable host–guest complex. In addition, 2D NOESY NMR (Figure S2 in Supporting Information File 1) was carried out to further confirm the interaction between m-TPEWP5 and G (1 equiv of each) in D2O. A strong cross-correlation peak was perceived between the m-TPEWP5 aromatic protons and the Hc proton of G. The above results evidenced that the alanine pendant of the guest unit stayed in the m-TPEWP5 cavity.


Figure 1: 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O, 298 K) spectra of m-TPEWP5 (1.0 mM), m-TPEWP5 (1.0 mM) + G (1.0 mM), and G (1.0 mM).

Besides, in order to confirm the host–guest interactions between m-TPEWP5 and G, fluorescence titration studies were carried out in aqueous solution. As shown in Figure 2a, the free host m-TPEWP5 showed a maximum emission at 465 nm. Upon gradually increasing the concentration of G (0 to 1 equiv) into m-TPEWP5, the fluorescence intensities were significantly increased with respect to G concentrations and no considerable changes were observed when further increasing the G concentration (1.2 equiv). The above results corroborated that the free rotation of m-TPEWP5 rings was arrested during the complexation with G, thus further leads to the enhanced AIE effect [33,34].


Figure 2: (a) Fluorescence spectra of m-TPEWP5 (1 × 10−5 M) with different concentrations of G (0 to 1.2 equiv); (b) Job’s plot of m-TPEWP5[Graphic 8]G showing a 1:1 binding stoichiometry between m-TPEWP5 and G by plotting the emission intensity differences at 470 nm against the mole fraction of G in an aqueous solution (λex = 320 nm).

To examine the binding stoichiometric ratio of the host–guest complex, Job’s plot [35] method was employed by using fluorescence titration experiments. As shown in Figure S3 (see Supporting Information File 1), the maximum mole fraction was observed at 0.5 (Figure 2b), which corresponds to a 1:1 binding stoichiometric ratio between G and m-TPEWP5 in the aqueous solution. Furthermore, the association constant (Ka) [36] was calculated to be 8.62 × 104 M−1 based on the UV–vis titration experiment (Figure S4, Supporting Information File 1). This result further confirmed that the binding interaction between m-TPEWP5 and G is strong enough to form a stable complex in an aqueous solution.

The morphology of the supramolecular m-TPEWP5[Graphic 9]G and m-TPEWP5[Graphic 10]G-EsY systems was monitored by using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). As shown in Figure 3, m-TPEWP5[Graphic 11]G self-assembled to form a worm-like nanostructure (diameter = 748 nm). After the loading of EsY into m-TPEWP5[Graphic 12]G, the worm-like structure changed into a nanorod (diameter = 652 nm) assembly via electrostatic interactions. In comparison, the diameter and length of the m-TPEWP5[Graphic 13]G assembly were slightly higher than that of m-TPEWP5[Graphic 14]G-EsY, which revealed that host–guest complex aggregated to form a stable structural assembly, then a dye-loaded composite system [32].


Figure 3: TEM images of (a) m-TPEWP5[Graphic 15]G; (b) m-TPEWP5[Graphic 16]G-EsY. [m-TPEWP5] = 1 × 10−4 M, [G] = 1 × 10−4 M, [EsY] = 1 × 10−4 M.

The energy transfer efficiency of the supramolecular m-TPEWP5[Graphic 17]G-EsY self-assembled composite system was examined by using m-TPEWP5[Graphic 18]G and EsY as an ideal donor and acceptor, respectively. Initially, we compared the overlapping efficiencies of both donor and acceptor systems by using UV–vis and fluorescence spectroscopy. The absorption band of the EsY acceptor shows good overlapping with the emission band of m-TPEWP5[Graphic 19]G donor (Figure 4a). We therefore speculated, that there may be an efficient FRET process between the donor and acceptor containing nanorod assembly. As shown in Figure 4b, upon exciting at the donor wavelength (λex = 320 nm), the fluorescence intensity of the m-TPEWP5[Graphic 20]G donor gradually decreased, whereas the EsY acceptor emission peak at 540 nm gradually increased thus indicating an efficient energy transfer is taking place. This was further supported by the observation, that upon loading of EsY into the m-TPEWP5[Graphic 21]G assembly, the color of the donor solution changed from sky blue to greenish-yellow under UV light. At a 2:1 donor/acceptor molar ratio, a maximum FRET efficiency of 31% was achieved [30]. This result suggested that m-TPEWP5[Graphic 22]G-EsY self-assembled nanosystem could be used as a nanoreactor for organic photocatalytic reactions in an aqueous medium. The nature of the interaction between m-TPEWP5[Graphic 23]G and EsY was evaluated by 1H NMR titration studies in D2O (Figure S5 in Supporting Information File 1). When 1 equiv of EsY was added into the m-TPEWP5[Graphic 24]G solution, the resonance signals of EsY were shifted to upfield regions, which was caused by steric effects and electrostatic interactions between the quaternary ammonium groups containing m-TPEWP5 and the negatively charged EsY. These results evidenced that the EsY molecule was adsorbed on the surface of m-TPEWP5 via electrostatic interactions.


Figure 4: (a) Normalized absorption and emission spectra of the EsY acceptor and the m-TPEWP5[Graphic 25]G donor assembly; (b) Fluorescence spectra of the m-TPEWP5[Graphic 26]G assembly with steadily increasing the equivalents of EsY in an aqueous medium (λex. = 320 nm). Inset: Photograph of m-TPEWP5[Graphic 27]G before and after the addition of EsY under UV light.

To mimic natural photosynthesis, the harvested energy of the m-TPEWP5[Graphic 28]G-EsY nanoreactor system could potentially be applied to a photocatalytic dehalogenation reaction. Normally, most chromophoric dye molecules can be utilized in photoredox reactions under the irradiation of light with suitable wavelength [6]. However, in the case of the m-TPEWP5[Graphic 29]G-EsY nanosystem, which contains conjugated molecules and displays harvesting antenna effects from ultraviolet to visible light wavelengths, solar light might be successfully employed to catalyze these reactions. Here, we used white light (20 W) as a solar light simulator for the photocatalytic dehalogenation reactions. Upon light irradiation, the absorbed light energy could be transferred from the m-TPEWP5[Graphic 30]G donor to the EsY acceptor through the FRET process, whilst the m-TPEWP5[Graphic 31]G-EsY nanorod assembly could act as a nanoreactor providing a suitable environment for the photochemical catalytic reaction in aqueous solution under visible light irradiation.

In the presence of 0.5 mol % m-TPEWP5[Graphic 32]G-EY in aqueous solution, 2-bromo-1-phenylethanone (1a) gave acetophenone (2a) as product in good yield (97%) under white light irradiation for 2 hours (Table 1 and Supporting Information File 1, Figure S6). In comparison, we added an internal standard (1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene) to the final crude reaction mixture and calculated the NMR yield of the product. From the above method, the yield of the product 2a (97%) is almost identical with our previous results (i.e., assumption of complete conversion of the starting material) as shown in Figure S7 (Supporting Information File 1). Therefore, these results corroborated that there were almost no other byproducts in the system. For further confirmation, we have included the 13C NMR spectrum of the crude product 2a in Supporting Information File 1 (Figure S8).

Table 1: 2-Bromo-1-phenylethanone dehalogenation reaction under various reaction conditions.a

[Graphic 37]
Entry Photocatalysta Light irradiation Yieldb [%]
1 none yes 28
2 EsY yes 38
3 m-TPEWP5[Graphic 38]G yes 40
4 m-TPEWP5[Graphic 39]G-EsY yes 97
5c m-TPEWP5[Graphic 40]G-EsY no no reaction

aReaction conditions: Bromoacetophenone (20 mg, 0.1 mmol), Hantzsch ester (28 mg, 0.11 mmol), N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA, 35 μL, 0.2 mmol), m-TPEWP5[Graphic 41]G-EsY in water (2.5 mL), 20 W white light, rt, N2, 2 h. bProduct yield obtained from 1H NMR spectra; cUnder dark conditions (no light irradiation).

As a control experiment, the reaction was carried out in the absence of catalyst m-TPEWP5[Graphic 33]G with EsY alone (Figure S14, Supporting Information File 1), respectively, and the obtained product yield was very low under light irradiation. Notably, under dark conditions (no light irradiation), there was no product observed in the resulting solution. The above result evidenced that a light source is indispensable for the catalytic dehalogenation reaction in an aqueous environment. Overall, the m-TPEWP5[Graphic 34]G-EsY system showed high catalytic efficiency within a short time of light irradiation in aqueous solution, which was due to the fact that the loaded EsY dye molecules on the surface of the TPEWP5[Graphic 35]G nanorod assembly significantly decreased photobleaching during light irradiation. In addition, the AIE donor molecules allowed an ordered arrangement of the loaded negatively charged dye acceptor on the positively charged surface, which might avoid aggregation-caused quenching effects and produced better catalytic efficiency. These results revealed that the m-TPEWP5[Graphic 36]G-EsY nanoreactor can act as an effective photocatalytic system to harvest and transform solar energy into chemical energy in aqueous solution.

Similarly, we carried out the dehalogenation reactions by using various α-bromoacetophenone derivatives as substrates. As shown in Scheme 2, different substrates 1 containing electron-donating (1b,c) and electron-withdrawing substituents (1d,e) and 2-bromo-2-acetonaphthone (1f) were examined in the reaction. Most substrates afforded the corresponding products in good yields (the 1H NMR spectra of the reaction mixtures used for calculation of yields are collected in Supporting Information File 1): good yields were observed for 4-methylacetophenone (2b, 97%, Figure S9), 3-methoxyacetophenone (2c, 87%, Figure S10), 4-chloroacetophenone (2d, 76%, Figure S11), and 4-(trifluoromethyl)acetophenone (2e, 86%, Figure S12) and a moderate yield was obtained for 2-acetonaphthone (2j, 50%, Figure S13) demonstrating the general applicability of m-TPEWP5[Graphic 42]G-EsY as an efficient photocatalyst.


Scheme 2: Products from 2-bromo-1-phenylethanone dehalogenation reactions in the presence of m-TPEWP5[Graphic 43]G-EsY nanoassembly under white light irradiation. Reaction conditions: Bromoacetophenone (0.1 mmol), Hantzsch ester (28 mg, 0.11 mmol), N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA, 35 μL, 0.2 mmol), m-TPEWP5[Graphic 44]G-EsY in water (0.5 mol %, 2.5 mL), 20 W white light, rt, N2, 2 h. Product yields were obtained from 1H NMR spectra.

To understand the process for this photocatalytic dehalogenation reaction, a possible reaction mechanism is proposed in Figure 5 [37]. Upon light irradiation, the ground state of m-TPEWP5[Graphic 45]G donor absorbs light energy and changes to the excited state (TPEWP5[Graphic 46]G*) energy level. Through energy transfer from TPEWP5[Graphic 47]G* to ground state EsY the latter undergoes excitation to the excited state EsY* and is reduced by the Hantzsch ester to generate the radical anion EsY•−. Subsequently, electron transfer from EsY•− to the substrate α-bromoacetophenone (1a) gives the corresponding acetophenone radical, whilst EsY•− is oxidized to EsY. The acetophenone radical combines with a H-atom abstracted from the radical cation of the Hantzsch ester to form acetophenone (2a) as the final product and diethyl 2,6-dimethylpyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate after deprotonation in the presence of the base DIPEA.


Figure 5: Proposed mechanism for the 2-bromo-1-phenylethanone dehalogenation reaction mediated by m-TPEWP5[Graphic 48]G-EsY nanoassembly as a photocatalyst.


In conclusion, we have fabricated a simple and efficient supramolecular photocatalytic system based on host–guest self-assembled m-TPEWP5[Graphic 49]G donor and EsY as acceptor. Briefly, the m-TPEWP5 host and G guest molecule were involved in the inclusion complex and further self-assembled to form worm-like supramolecular nanostructures, which displayed an AIE effect via restricted phenyl-ring rotation of m-TPEWP5. After that, the negative EsY acceptor was loaded on the positively charged surface of the m-TPEWP5[Graphic 50]G donor assembly to form a nanorod structure, which exhibited moderate FRET efficiency at a 2:1 molar ratio of the donor/acceptor. Inspired by photosynthesis and followed by the energy transfer process, the m-TPEWP5[Graphic 51]G-EsY supramolecular nanorod assembly could be employed as a nanoreactor for a photocatalytic dehalogenation reaction, i.e., debromination of 2-bromo-1-phenylethanone derivatives with high yields and short reaction time in an aqueous solution. Based on the above results, the fabricated AIE-emissive FRET system with chiral guest can be further utilized for asymmetric catalysis in water, which is currently underway in our laboratory.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Experimental details, NMR spectra, host–guest interaction, FRET, and other materials.
Format: PDF Size: 2.0 MB Download


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Sino-German Mobility Program (No. M-0411), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20211179, BK20200432), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (NS2021040).


  1. McDermott, G.; Prince, S. M.; Freer, A. A.; Hawthornthwaite-Lawless, A. M.; Papiz, M. Z.; Cogdell, R. J.; Isaacs, N. W. Nature 1995, 374, 517–521. doi:10.1038/374517a0
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Holt, N. E.; Zigmantas, D.; Valkunas, L.; Li, X.-P.; Niyogi, K. K.; Fleming, G. R. Science 2005, 307, 433–436. doi:10.1126/science.1105833
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Polívka, T.; Frank, H. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 1125–1134. doi:10.1021/ar100030m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Scholes, G. D.; Fleming, G. R.; Olaya-Castro, A.; van Grondelle, R. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 763–774. doi:10.1038/nchem.1145
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Xiao, T.; Zhong, W.; Zhou, L.; Xu, L.; Sun, X.-Q.; Elmes, R. B. P.; Hu, X.-Y.; Wang, L. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2019, 30, 31–36. doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2018.05.034
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Wang, K.; Velmurugan, K.; Li, B.; Hu, X.-Y. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 13641–13654. doi:10.1039/d1cc06011b
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  7. Barber, J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 185–196. doi:10.1039/b802262n
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Teunissen, A. J. P.; Pérez-Medina, C.; Meijerink, A.; Mulder, W. J. M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 7027–7044. doi:10.1039/c8cs00278a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Jia, P.-P.; Xu, L.; Hu, Y.-X.; Li, W.-J.; Wang, X.-Q.; Ling, Q.-H.; Shi, X.; Yin, G.-Q.; Li, X.; Sun, H.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, H.-B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 399–408. doi:10.1021/jacs.0c11370
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  10. Wang, K.; Jordan, J. H.; Velmurugan, K.; Tian, X.; Zuo, M.; Hu, X.-Y.; Wang, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 9205–9214. doi:10.1002/anie.202010150
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Zuo, M.; Velmurugan, K.; Wang, K.; Tian, X.; Hu, X.-Y. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2021, 17, 139–155. doi:10.3762/bjoc.17.15
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Pochan, D.; Scherman, O. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 13699–13700. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00884
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Hartgerink, J. D.; Beniash, E.; Stupp, S. I. Science 2001, 294, 1684–1688. doi:10.1126/science.1063187
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Huang, J.; Yu, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Gu, Z.; Zhang, S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 29030–29037. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b06954
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Guo, S.; Song, Y.; He, Y.; Hu, X.-Y.; Wang, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 3163–3167. doi:10.1002/anie.201800175
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  16. Huo, M.; Ye, Q.; Che, H.; Wang, X.; Wei, Y.; Yuan, J. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 1126–1133. doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.6b02499
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Peng, H.-Q.; Chen, Y.-Z.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, Q.-Z.; Wu, L.-Z.; Tung, C.-H.; Zhang, L.-P.; Tong, Q.-X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 2088–2092. doi:10.1002/anie.201107723
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Chadha, G.; Yang, Q.-Z.; Zhao, Y. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 12939–12942. doi:10.1039/c5cc04377h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Pallavi, P.; Sk, B.; Ahir, P.; Patra, A. Chem. – Eur. J. 2018, 24, 1151–1158. doi:10.1002/chem.201704437
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Chen, P.-Z.; Weng, Y.-X.; Niu, L.-Y.; Chen, Y.-Z.; Wu, L.-Z.; Tung, C.-H.; Yang, Q.-Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2759–2763. doi:10.1002/anie.201510503
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Ling, Q.; Cheng, T.; Tan, S.; Huang, J.; Xu, L. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 2884–2890. doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2020.08.020
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Li, Y.; Rajasree, S. S.; Lee, G. Y.; Yu, J.; Tang, J.-H.; Ni, R.; Li, G.; Houk, K. N.; Deria, P.; Stang, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 2908–2919. doi:10.1021/jacs.0c12853
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Kim, H.-J.; Nandajan, P. C.; Gierschner, J.; Park, S. Y. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1705141. doi:10.1002/adfm.201705141
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Zhang, D.; Liu, Y.; Fan, Y.; Yu, C.; Zheng, Y.; Jin, H.; Fu, L.; Zhou, Y.; Yan, D. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 7652–7661. doi:10.1002/adfm.201603118
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Sun, G.; Qian, W.; Jiao, J.; Han, T.; Shi, Y.; Hu, X.-Y.; Wang, L. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 9590–9596. doi:10.1039/d0ta03169k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Petroselli, M.; Chen, Y.-Q.; Rebek, J., Jr.; Yu, Y. Green Synth. Catal. 2021, 2, 123–130. doi:10.1016/j.gresc.2021.03.004
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Ogoshi, T.; Yamafuji, D.; Yamagishi, T.-a.; Brouwer, A. M. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 5468–5470. doi:10.1039/c3cc42612b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Wang, X.-H.; Song, N.; Hou, W.; Wang, C.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Tang, J.; Yang, Y.-W. Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 2019, 31, 1903962. doi:10.1002/adma.201903962
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Zhang, D.; Yu, W.; Li, S.; Xia, Y.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Yi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 1313–1317. doi:10.1021/jacs.0c12522
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Hao, M.; Sun, G.; Zuo, M.; Xu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Hu, X.-Y.; Wang, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 10095–10100. doi:10.1002/anie.201912654
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  31. Tian, X.; Zuo, M.; Niu, P.; Velmurugan, K.; Wang, K.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, L.; Hu, X.-Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 37466–37474. doi:10.1021/acsami.1c07106
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Velmurugan, K.; Murtaza, A.; Saeed, A.; Li, J.; Wang, K.; Zuo, M.; Liu, Q.; Hu, X.-Y. CCS Chem. 2022, in press. doi:10.31635/ccschem.022.202101749
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  33. Luo, J.; Xie, Z.; Lam, J. W. Y.; Cheng, L.; Chen, H.; Qiu, C.; Kwok, H. S.; Zhan, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, D.; Tang, B. Z. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1740–1741. doi:10.1039/b105159h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Le Guével, X.; Hötzer, B.; Jung, G.; Schneider, M. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 2974–2981. doi:10.1039/c0jm02660c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Velmurugan, K.; Thamilselvan, A.; Antony, R.; Kannan, V. R.; Tang, L.; Nandhakumar, R. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2017, 333, 130–141. doi:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.10.025
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Prabakaran, G.; Velmurugan, K.; Vickram, R.; David, C. I.; Thamilselvan, A.; Prabhu, J.; Nandhakumar, R. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 2021, 246, 119018. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2020.119018
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Sun, G.; Zuo, M.; Qian, W.; Jiao, J.; Hu, X.-Y.; Wang, L. Green Synth. Catal. 2021, 2, 32–37. doi:10.1016/j.gresc.2021.01.003
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities