Thematic Series currently open for submission: (1) Nanocarbon composites (2) 2D materials (3) FEBIP/FEBID chemistry (4) Nanotribology


The 2015 Impact Factor is 2.778 according to the Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports.

Open Access 2020 is an initiative to induce the transformation from subscription to open access publishing.

Confirming exceptionally high level of publishing standards

 
 

Self-organization of mesoscopic silver wires by electrochemical deposition

Sheng Zhong1,2, Thomas Koch1,2, Stefan Walheim1,2, Harald Rösner3, Eberhard Nold4, Aaron Kobler2,5, Torsten Scherer2,6, Di Wang2,6, Christian Kübel2,6, Mu Wang7, Horst Hahn2,5,8,9 and Thomas Schimmel1,2,9
1Institute of Applied Physics and Center for Functional Nanostructures (CFN), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
2Institute of Nanotechnology (INT), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
3Institute of Materials Physics, University of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
4Institute for Materials Research I (IMF I) Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
5Joint Research Laboratory Nanomaterials (KIT and TUD), Technische Universität Darmstadt (TUD), Petersenstr. 32, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
6Karlsruhe Nano Micro Facility (KNMF), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
7National Laboratory of Solid-State Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 21009, China
8Helmholtz Institute Ulm Electrochemical Energy Storage, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
9Herbert Gleiter Institute of Nanoscience, NUST, Nanjing 21009, China
Email of corresponding author Corresponding author email     
This article is part of the Thematic Series "Advances in nanomaterials".
Guest Editors: H. D. Gleiter and T. Schimmel
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 1285–1290.
doi:10.3762/bjnano.5.142

Article Information

Part of Thematic Series

Advances in nanomaterials
 
 
 
 

Abstract

Long, straight mesoscale silver wires have been fabricated from AgNO3 electrolyte via electrodeposition without the help of templates, additives, and surfactants. Although the wire growth speed is very fast due to growth under non-equilibrium conditions, the wire morphology is regular and uniform in diameter. Structural studies reveal that the wires are single-crystalline, with the [112] direction as the growth direction. A possible growth mechanism is suggested. Auger depth profile measurements show that the wires are stable against oxidation under ambient conditions. This unique system provides a convenient way for the study of self-organization in electrochemical environments as well as for the fabrication of highly-ordered, single-crystalline metal nanowires.

Keywords: crystal growth; electrochemistry; electrodeposition; mesowires; nanoelectrochemistry; nanowires; self-organization; silver nanowires; silver nitrate; stability

Top

Introduction

Nanoscale and mesoscale metal wires have attracted considerable attention due to their potential application in new electronic, sensor, and optical devices [1-10]. Furthermore, metallic nanowires and -contacts play a key role as leads and contacts for contacting molecules in the field of molecular electronics (for a collection of recent work see [11-19]). Silver wires, in particular have been the focus of research due to their excellent electric and optical properties [4-6,9,10,20]. For example, itinerant electrons in silver wires can strongly interact with incident electromagnetic waves at specific frequencies and induce a collective resonant absorption on the surface known as surface plasmon resonance [21]. Because of this feature, noble metals can serve as plasmon waveguides [22,23]. Especially, single-crystalline metallic materials are preferred in order to reduce the loss in transmitting signals. Therefore, the fabrication of microscopic building blocks, such as single-crystalline silver wires, is a crucial step towards the implementation of nanodevices and represents a significant challenge in nanoscale science. There are various existing methods to fabricate mesoscale metallic wires: Electron beam lithography is a precise and well-controlled method, yet for larger numbers of wires rather expensive and time consuming. Electrochemically oxidized anodic alumina membrane (AAM) templates are also often used to fabricate metallic nanowires [24]. Yet the AAM-mediated nanowires are often inhomogeneous in morphology, poly-crystalline in structure, and fragile in their mechanical properties. This is also true for nanowires fabricated with the tip of an atomic force microscope used as a mechano-electrochemical pen [25]. As reported recently, this technique allows to fabricate predefined metallic structures on surfaces with nanoscale resolution, which, however cannot be fabricated as freestanding wires [25,26].

Here we report a unique method to long, straight, and single-crystalline mesoscopic silver wires by electrochemical deposition in the potentiostatic mode without the need to use any templates, surfactants or additives. At the same time, our method has the advantages of high deposition rate, low reaction temperature, and low cost which are traditionally associated with electrochemical deposition techniques [27].

Top

Results and Discussion

The fabrication process of the mesoscopic silver wires is summarized in Figure 1. It is similar to that described in our previous work [28-31]. Before electrodeposition, the electrolyte in the deposition cell is carefully solidified by lowering the temperature to a preset value, which is usually just below the freezing point of the electrolyte. Due to the segregation effect, AgNO3 is partially expelled from the ice of the electrolyte during solidification [32]. As a consequence, the concentration of aqueous AgNO3 electrolyte in the deposition cell increases. When equilibrium is reached, a thin layer of concentrated AgNO3 electrolyte is formed between frozen electrolyte and the glass plates of the deposition cell (Figure 1a).

[2190-4286-5-142-1]
Figure 1: Schematic diagrams of the experimental procedure. (a) By slowly freezing the silver nitrate electrolyte a thin aqueous layer of electrolyte forms between the glass slide and the ice. The concentration of electrolyte is higher than the initial concentration due to the segregation effect. (b) Applying a constant voltage across the two electrodes let the silver grow from the cathode into the electrolyte. (c) Cooling is stopped and the temperature rises after deposition. After melting the ice the silver wires can be taken out of the deposition cell and rinsed with deionized water (d). After drying they are ready for further TEM- and SEM-analysis.

Thereafter, a constant voltage is applied across the two electrodes, and deposits first nucleate from the cathode, grow laterally into the aqueous electrolyte, and form aligned wires which grow towards the anode (Figure 1b). It takes several minutes before the deposit occupy an area of about 0.5 cm2. When electrodeposition is finished, the temperature is increased to melt the ice (Figure 1c). The wire deposits stack on the glass substrate and can be easily taken out of the electrodeposition cell for further examinations (Figure 1d). The thickness of the electrolyte layer can be roughly estimated by two methods: 1. the thickness of the deposits piled on the substrate [28,31] and 2. by measuring the electric resistance across the cell [33]. Using method 2 the authors showed, that the thickness of the CuSO4 electrolyte layer can be tuned from 100 nm to 1.4 µm by changing the temperature from −8 °C to −1 °C [33]. In the experiments presented here the thickness of the layer was in the range of several micrometers based on the observed thickness of the deposition.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) shows that the silver wires are growing parallel to the glass substrate (Figure 2). Bunches of silver wires initially nucleate on the cathode and propagate laterally on the glass substrate parallel to the local electric field. Eventually silver wires cover the glass substrate and pile up like log stacks. The overall morphology of the deposits exhibits bunch- and tree-like structures, as shown in Figure 2a. Detailed features of the silver wires are illustrated in Figure 2b and 2c, where the wires are straight uniform in diameter and exhibit a smooth surface. The diameter of the wires ranges from about 150 nm to 600 nm. Preliminary results show a strong influence of the applied voltage on the diameter of the wires.

[2190-4286-5-142-2]
Figure 2: SEM images of silver wires: (a) Overview: low-magnification image. (b) Zoom-in of (a). (c) Image of one silver wire, illustrating the homogeneous thickness and smooth surface. (d) Image of several long silver wires.

Several long wires are shown in Figure 2d. Sometimes the length of the wires exceeds 150 µm. As illustrated in Figure 2, the deposits macroscopically consist of long and straight wires, occasionally with regular side branches. Microscopically, straight silver wires are often aligned and form ordered arrays. In our experiments, the silver wires are robust and can be taken out of the cell together with the substrates without being damaged. They can be removed from the substrate and subsequently rearranged on other substrates.

The microstructure and chemical composition of the silver wires were analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy.

Figure 3a shows a typical bright-field TEM image of silver wires and the corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Figure 3b). The SAED patterns demonstrate a distinct single-crystalline feature. The data show that the growth direction of the wire is perpendicular to the [111] direction, along the [112] direction. Figure 3c is a scanning TEM (STEM) image of a silver wire. Figure 3d shows the EDX spectrum collected from the marked region in Figure 3c. Strong silver element peaks are identified, together with very weak gold, iron, carbon, and cobalt peaks. Gold and carbon signals most likely come from the carbon-covered gold TEM grid, on which the sample has been deposited. Cobalt and iron most likely come from the pole pieces of the objective lens. Oxygen and sulfur signals are not observed. Therefore, one can conclude that the silver wires grown in the experiments presented here are chemically pure.

[2190-4286-5-142-3]
Figure 3: TEM analysis of thin silver wires and corresponding EDX information. (a) Bright-field image of typical silver wires with the axes which should be oriented in [112] direction and (b) the corresponding SAED patterns recorded from the marked region, the growth direction is mostly like [112]. The zone axis is <111>. (c) HAADF-STEM image of a silver wire and (d) the corresponding EDX spectrum taken at the labelled position on the wire of Figure 3c. Strong silver element peaks can be identified. Very weak gold, iron, carbon, and cobalt peaks were also found. Gold and carbon come from the substrate. The cobalt and iron signal comes from the pole pieces of the objective lens; no peak can be attributed to sulfur, nitrogen or oxygen, the latter demonstrating that the silver wires are not oxidized at ambient conditions in air.

The application of silver wires as building blocks for microelectronics requires good chemical stability, especially the stability against oxidation under ambient conditions. For most metallic microstructures, however, stability against oxidation is a challenge. The reason is that reducing the length scale means increasing the surface/volume ratio and thus induces more instability in comparison with bulk systems. Therefore, the aging of the silver wires was investigated by scanning Auger micro spectroscopy (SAMS).

Figure 4 shows the element depth profiles of silver wires, which were exposed to ambient conditions for different times. The profiles are determined by Auger measurements between several short sputtering steps. The left diagram shows data obtained from a freshly-prepared sample (exposed to ambient air for less than one hour) and the right one the data of an aged sample that had been exposed to ambient conditions for four months. Comparing the two depth profiles, no significant differences can be identified. As illustrated in Figure 4, in a depth of only 5 nm, the concentration of the oxide already virtually approaches zero. The thickness of the oxide layers did not change significantly during the aging process and the oxide layer is not more than approx. 5 nm thick. Therefore, Figure 4 indicates that the silver wires are stable against oxidation under ambient conditions. Silver typically corrodes under ambient conditions by silver sulfidation with hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and/or carbonyl sulfide (OCS) in the atmosphere, with this phenomenon being amplified by water and oxygen [34]. The origin of the stability of our structures is the subject of an ongoing study.

[2190-4286-5-142-4]
Figure 4: Auger depth profile curves of freshly prepared and aged silver wires. The full and dotted curves correspond to data obtained from two different wires. The relative atomic concentration is plotted versus the sputter depth; (a) freshly-prepared sample taken out of the electrodeposition cell and washed by deionized water and immediately investigated by SAMS. (b) Sample aged by exposure to ambient conditions for four months. Freshly-prepared and aged samples show similar depth profiles, indicating that the single-crystalline silver wires are stable under ambient conditions on this time scale.

It is interesting to consider the mechanism for electrochemical self-organization of such long, smooth silver wires, bearing in mind, that the growth rate of the wires is of the order of 10 μm/s in our experiments and that the entropy of interfacial phase transition for silver is small. The faces tend to be roughened [34] and the surfaces of the wires are rounded without obvious faces. This may indicate that the surface is rough on atomic scale. It is known, that the (112) surface energy is relatively high and that the growth speed of [112] is faster than that of other facets [35]. Hence elongated silver wires are generated due to the anisotropy in growth rate. However, anisotropy in growth rate cannot guarantee for the formation of smooth silver wires with homogeneous diameter as that shown in Figure 2b,c. The point is that the side faces of the wires are rough on the atomic scale, and should possess linear growth kinetics. Thus, any small driving force should make the side faces to grow. If this would be the case, then we would observe conical silver wires instead of iso-diameter ones. We suggest that the formation of uniform silver wires in our system is due to the unique geometric restriction of the deposition cell and the screening effect in Laplacian field [36,37]. According to Chazalviel, the cation concentration behind the growing front decreases dramatically in a two-dimensional electrodeposition system [37]. Therefore, active deposition takes place only on the growth front, and growth in those parts behind the growth front is virtually stopped. In a thick electrodeposition cell, this condition cannot be realized easily because of convection and migration of the ions in the electric field. Our thin film electrodeposition system is closer to an ideal two-dimensional growth system, which helps to explain the low diameters of the silver wires.

The growth mechanism of the silver wires can be explained in the following model: Initial silver wires nucleate on the cathode and grow towards the anode, presumably with [112] as the preferred growth direction. Behind the growth front the wires do not increase their diameter due to the depletion effect. These two factors allow the wires, once they are initiated along the direction of local concentration gradient, to develop into homogeneous, non-branching wires, as shown in Figure 2b,c. However, if the axis of the wire deviates from the local concentration gradient, e.g., if in the initial direction of the axis of the wire is not perpendicular to the cathode (anode), sidebranches will be triggered. Since the sides of the silver wires are rough, there is no significant energy barrier to prevent the generation of sidebranches. When this sidebranching mechanism works, the sidebranches should develop on only one side of the wires, that is, from the side facing the cation supply. Indeed such comb-like structures were observed in our experiments, too. As illustrated in Figure 5, side branching takes place only on one side of the wire and forms a 60 degree angle with respect to the main stem. Electron diffraction indicates that the side branches maintain the same crystallographic direction.

[2190-4286-5-142-5]
Figure 5: TEM analysis of thin comb-like silver dendrites (dark areas in the image left) and corresponding SAED patterns. Patterns (1)–(5) (right) were recorded at different spots marked by the corresponding number in the TEM image (left). The zone axis is <111>. This suggests that the comb structure is single-crystalline. All SAED patterns display the same hexagonal pattern. This suggests that the comb structure is single- crystalline. Each branch should grow along one of the <112> directions.

These observations confirm our understanding of the silver wire growth and support the nutrient-supply-flux induced side branching mechanism in silver wire growth. This branching mechanism is valid when the wire growth has very strong anisotropy and the side faces of the wire are rough.

Top

Conclusion

We have reported a novel technique for fabricating single-crystalline silver wires by electrochemical deposition, without introducing templates, additives and surfactants. The simple experimental setup and the wide range of control parameters make this approach a versatile and simple pathway to fabricate metal meso- and nanostructures. This unique system provides a convenient way to investigate fundamental processes of self-organization in electrochemical environments. Our results are pointing the way to a controlled fabrication of highly-ordered, single-crystalline metal nanowires, opening perspectives, e.g., for on-chip electrical connectors, sensors as well as photonic and plasmonic devices.

Top

Experimental

Electrodeposition was carried out in a cell with two parallel electrodes made of silver wires (99.99%). The electrolyte solution was prepared with AgNO3 (99.8%) and deionized water. The concentration of the solution was 0.05 M.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed with a Gemini 2 system from Zeiss (LEO). The scanning Auger micro spectroscopy (SAMS) investigations were done with a PHI 680 AUGER NANOPROBE UHV system with 15 nm resolution and depth profile equipment. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) investigations were performed with a Philips Tecnai F20 ST system operated at 200 kV. EDX analyses were carried out in STEM (scanning transmission electron microscopy) mode in order to measure nanometer-scale samples (1 nm spot size for the EDX measurements presented in this article). STEM micrographs were acquired using an HAADF (High-Angle Annular Dark-Field) detector.

Top

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Cynthia Volkert for stimulating discussions. This work was financially supported by the DFG-Center for Functional Nanostructures (CFN) at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology and by the Baden-Wuerttemberg Foundation within the Network of Excellence "Functional Nanostructures".

Top

References

  1. Lieber, C. M. Sci. Am. 2001, 285, 58–64. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0901-58
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Chen, J.; Wiley, B. J.; Xia, Y. Langmuir 2007, 23, 4120–4129. doi:10.1021/la063193y
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Kuchibhatla, S. V. N. T.; Karakoti, A. S.; Bera, D.; Seal, S. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2007, 52, 699–913. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.08.001
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Rycenga, M.; Cobley, C. M.; Zeng, J.; Li, W.; Moran, C. H.; Zhang, Q.; Qin, D.; Xia, Y. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3669–3712. doi:10.1021/cr100275d
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  5. Hartland, G. V. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3858–3887. doi:10.1021/cr1002547
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  6. Dawson, K.; Strutwolf, J.; Rodgers, K. P.; Herzog, G.; Arrigan, D. W. M.; Quinn, A. J.; O’Riordan, A. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 5535–5540. doi:10.1021/ac2004086
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  7. Wild, B.; Cao, L.; Sun, Y.; Khanal, B. P.; Zubarev, E. R.; Gray, S. K.; Scherer, N. F.; Pelton, M. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 472–482. doi:10.1021/nn203802e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Mann, S. A.; Garnett, E. C. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 3173–3178. doi:10.1021/nl401179h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Garnett, E. C.; Cai, W.; Cha, J. J.; Mahmood, F.; Connor, S. T.; Greyson Christoforo, M.; Cui, Y.; McGehee, M. D.; Brongersma, M. L. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 241–249. doi:10.1038/nmat3238
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  10. van de Groep, J.; Spinelli, P.; Polman, A. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3138–3144. doi:10.1021/nl301045a
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  11. May, F.; Wegewijs, M. R.; Hofstetter, W. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 693–698. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.75
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Hong, W.; Valkenier, H.; Mészáros, G.; Manrique, D. Z.; Mishchenko, A.; Putz, A.; García, P. M.; Lambert, C. J.; Hummelen, J. C.; Wandlowski, T. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 699–713. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.76
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Perrin, M. L.; Martin, C. A.; Prins, F.; Shaikh, A. J.; Eelkema, R.; van Esch, J. H.; van Ruitenbeek, J. M.; van der Zant, H. S. J.; Dulić, D. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 714–719. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.77
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Todorov, T. N.; Dundas, D.; Paxton, A. T.; Horsfield, A. P. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 727–733. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.79
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Obermair, C.; Kuhn, H.; Schimmel, T. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 740–745. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.81
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Strange, M.; Thygesen, K. S. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 746–754. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.82
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Nakashima, S.; Takahashi, Y.; Kiguchi, M. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 755–759. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.83
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Lü, J.-T.; Gunst, T.; Hedegård, P.; Brandbyge, M. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 814–823. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.90
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Solomon, G. C.; Bergfield, J. P.; Stafford, C. A.; Ratner, M. A. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 862–871. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.95
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Gaynor, W.; Burkhard, G. F.; McGehee, M. D.; Peumans, P. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2905–2910. doi:10.1002/adma.201100566
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. El-Sayed, M. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 257–264. doi:10.1021/ar960016n
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Barnes, W. L.; Dereux, A.; Ebbesen, T. W. Nature 2003, 424, 824–830. doi:10.1038/nature01937
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Wang, W.; Yang, Q.; Fan, F.; Xu, H.; Wang, Z. L. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1603–1608. doi:10.1021/nl104514m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Nishizawa, M.; Menon, V. P.; Martin, C. R. Science 1995, 268, 700–702. doi:10.1126/science.268.5211.700
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Obermair, C.; Wagner, A.; Schimmel, T. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 659–664. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.70
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  26. Obermair, C.; Kress, M.; Wagner, A.; Schimmel, T. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2012, 3, 824–830. doi:10.3762/bjnano.3.92
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Wang, Z. L. Characterization of nanophase materials; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, New York, 2000.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Wang, M.; Zhong, S.; Yin, X.-B.; Zhu, J.-M.; Peng, R.-W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, K.-Q.; Ming, N.-B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86, 3827. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3827
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  29. Zhong, S.; Koch, T.; Wang, M.; Scherer, T.; Walheim, S.; Hahn, H.; Schimmel, T. Small 2009, 5, 2265–2270. doi:10.1002/smll.200900746
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Zhong, S.; Wang, D.; Koch, T.; Wang, M.; Walheim, S.; Schimmel, T. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010, 10, 1455–1459. doi:10.1021/cg9012747
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Zhong, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhang, M.-Z.; Yin, X.-B.; Peng, R.-W.; Ming, N.-B. Phys. Rev. E 2003, 67, 061601. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.67.061601
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  32. Bruinsma, O. S. L.; van der Eerden, J. P. Science and technology of crystal growth; Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1995.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Weng, Y.-Y.; Si, J.-W.; Gao, W.-T.; Wu, Z.; Wang, M.; Peng, R.-W.; Ming, N.-B. Phys. Rev. E 2006, 73, 051601. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.73.051601
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  34. Elechiguerra, J. L.; Larios-Lopez, L.; Liu, C.; Garcia-Gutierrez, D.; Camacho-Bragado, A.; Yacaman, M. J. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 6042–6052. doi:10.1021/cm051532n
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  35. Galanakis, I.; Bihlmayer, G.; Bellini, V.; Papanikolaou, N.; Zeller, R.; Blügel, S.; Dederichs, P. H. EPL 2002, 58, 751–757. doi:10.1209/epl/i2002-00413-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Marsili, M. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 1992, 25, 3493. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/25/12/011
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Chazalviel, J.-N. Phys. Rev. A 1990, 42, 7355. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.42.7355
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
Top
Figure 1: Schematic diagrams of the experimental procedure. (a) By slowly freezing the silver nitrate electrolyte a thin aqueous layer of electrolyte forms between the glass slide and the ice. The concentration of electrolyte is higher than the initial concentration due to the segregation effect. (b) Applying a constant voltage across the two electrodes let the silver grow from the cathode into the electrolyte. (c) Cooling is stopped and the temperature rises after deposition. After melting the ice the silver wires can be taken out of the deposition cell and rinsed with deionized water (d). After drying they are ready for further TEM- and SEM-analysis. Move  Close
Figure 2: SEM images of silver wires: (a) Overview: low-magnification image. (b) Zoom-in of (a). (c) Image of one silver wire, illustrating the homogeneous thickness and smooth surface. (d) Image of several long silver wires. Move  Close
Figure 3: TEM analysis of thin silver wires and corresponding EDX information. (a) Bright-field image of typical silver wires with the axes which should be oriented in [112] direction and (b) the corresponding SAED patterns recorded from the marked region, the growth direction is mostly like [112]. The zone axis is <111>. (c) HAADF-STEM image of a silver wire and (d) the corresponding EDX spectrum taken at the labelled position on the wire of Figure 3c. Strong silver element peaks can be identified. Very weak gold, iron, carbon, and cobalt peaks were also found. Gold and carbon come from the substrate. The cobalt and iron signal comes from the pole pieces of the objective lens; no peak can be attributed to sulfur, nitrogen or oxygen, the latter demonstrating that the silver wires are not oxidized at ambient conditions in air. Move  Close
Figure 4: Auger depth profile curves of freshly prepared and aged silver wires. The full and dotted curves correspond to data obtained from two different wires. The relative atomic concentration is plotted versus the sputter depth; (a) freshly-prepared sample taken out of the electrodeposition cell and washed by deionized water and immediately investigated by SAMS. (b) Sample aged by exposure to ambient conditions for four months. Freshly-prepared and aged samples show similar depth profiles, indicating that the single-crystalline silver wires are stable under ambient conditions on this time scale. Move  Close
Figure 5: TEM analysis of thin comb-like silver dendrites (dark areas in the image left) and corresponding SAED patterns. Patterns (1)–(5) (right) were recorded at different spots marked by the corresponding number in the TEM image (left). The zone axis is <111>. This suggests that the comb structure is single-crystalline. All SAED patterns display the same hexagonal pattern. This suggests that the comb structure is single- crystalline. Each branch should grow along one of the <112> directions. Move  Close
25.Obermair, C.; Wagner, A.; Schimmel, T. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 659–664. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.70
26.Obermair, C.; Kress, M.; Wagner, A.; Schimmel, T. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2012, 3, 824–830. doi:10.3762/bjnano.3.92
Go to references 25,26
27.Wang, Z. L. Characterization of nanophase materials; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, New York, 2000.
Go to reference 27
24.Nishizawa, M.; Menon, V. P.; Martin, C. R. Science 1995, 268, 700–702. doi:10.1126/science.268.5211.700
Go to reference 24
25.Obermair, C.; Wagner, A.; Schimmel, T. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 659–664. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.70
Go to reference 25
21.El-Sayed, M. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 257–264. doi:10.1021/ar960016n
Go to reference 21
22.Barnes, W. L.; Dereux, A.; Ebbesen, T. W. Nature 2003, 424, 824–830. doi:10.1038/nature01937
23.Wang, W.; Yang, Q.; Fan, F.; Xu, H.; Wang, Z. L. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1603–1608. doi:10.1021/nl104514m
Go to references 22,23
11.May, F.; Wegewijs, M. R.; Hofstetter, W. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 693–698. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.75
12.Hong, W.; Valkenier, H.; Mészáros, G.; Manrique, D. Z.; Mishchenko, A.; Putz, A.; García, P. M.; Lambert, C. J.; Hummelen, J. C.; Wandlowski, T. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 699–713. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.76
13.Perrin, M. L.; Martin, C. A.; Prins, F.; Shaikh, A. J.; Eelkema, R.; van Esch, J. H.; van Ruitenbeek, J. M.; van der Zant, H. S. J.; Dulić, D. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 714–719. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.77
14.Todorov, T. N.; Dundas, D.; Paxton, A. T.; Horsfield, A. P. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 727–733. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.79
15.Obermair, C.; Kuhn, H.; Schimmel, T. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 740–745. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.81
16.Strange, M.; Thygesen, K. S. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 746–754. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.82
17.Nakashima, S.; Takahashi, Y.; Kiguchi, M. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 755–759. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.83
18.Lü, J.-T.; Gunst, T.; Hedegård, P.; Brandbyge, M. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 814–823. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.90
19.Solomon, G. C.; Bergfield, J. P.; Stafford, C. A.; Ratner, M. A. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 862–871. doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.95
Go to references 11-19
4.Rycenga, M.; Cobley, C. M.; Zeng, J.; Li, W.; Moran, C. H.; Zhang, Q.; Qin, D.; Xia, Y. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3669–3712. doi:10.1021/cr100275d
5.Hartland, G. V. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3858–3887. doi:10.1021/cr1002547
6.Dawson, K.; Strutwolf, J.; Rodgers, K. P.; Herzog, G.; Arrigan, D. W. M.; Quinn, A. J.; O’Riordan, A. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 5535–5540. doi:10.1021/ac2004086
9.Garnett, E. C.; Cai, W.; Cha, J. J.; Mahmood, F.; Connor, S. T.; Greyson Christoforo, M.; Cui, Y.; McGehee, M. D.; Brongersma, M. L. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 241–249. doi:10.1038/nmat3238
10.van de Groep, J.; Spinelli, P.; Polman, A. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3138–3144. doi:10.1021/nl301045a
20.Gaynor, W.; Burkhard, G. F.; McGehee, M. D.; Peumans, P. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2905–2910. doi:10.1002/adma.201100566
Go to references 4-6,9,10,20
1.Lieber, C. M. Sci. Am. 2001, 285, 58–64. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0901-58
2.Chen, J.; Wiley, B. J.; Xia, Y. Langmuir 2007, 23, 4120–4129. doi:10.1021/la063193y
3.Kuchibhatla, S. V. N. T.; Karakoti, A. S.; Bera, D.; Seal, S. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2007, 52, 699–913. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.08.001
4.Rycenga, M.; Cobley, C. M.; Zeng, J.; Li, W.; Moran, C. H.; Zhang, Q.; Qin, D.; Xia, Y. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3669–3712. doi:10.1021/cr100275d
5.Hartland, G. V. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3858–3887. doi:10.1021/cr1002547
6.Dawson, K.; Strutwolf, J.; Rodgers, K. P.; Herzog, G.; Arrigan, D. W. M.; Quinn, A. J.; O’Riordan, A. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 5535–5540. doi:10.1021/ac2004086
7.Wild, B.; Cao, L.; Sun, Y.; Khanal, B. P.; Zubarev, E. R.; Gray, S. K.; Scherer, N. F.; Pelton, M. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 472–482. doi:10.1021/nn203802e
8.Mann, S. A.; Garnett, E. C. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 3173–3178. doi:10.1021/nl401179h
9.Garnett, E. C.; Cai, W.; Cha, J. J.; Mahmood, F.; Connor, S. T.; Greyson Christoforo, M.; Cui, Y.; McGehee, M. D.; Brongersma, M. L. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 241–249. doi:10.1038/nmat3238
10.van de Groep, J.; Spinelli, P.; Polman, A. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3138–3144. doi:10.1021/nl301045a
Go to references 1-10
37.Chazalviel, J.-N. Phys. Rev. A 1990, 42, 7355. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.42.7355
Go to reference 37
36.Marsili, M. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 1992, 25, 3493. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/25/12/011
37.Chazalviel, J.-N. Phys. Rev. A 1990, 42, 7355. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.42.7355
Go to references 36,37
35.Galanakis, I.; Bihlmayer, G.; Bellini, V.; Papanikolaou, N.; Zeller, R.; Blügel, S.; Dederichs, P. H. EPL 2002, 58, 751–757. doi:10.1209/epl/i2002-00413-7
Go to reference 35
33.Weng, Y.-Y.; Si, J.-W.; Gao, W.-T.; Wu, Z.; Wang, M.; Peng, R.-W.; Ming, N.-B. Phys. Rev. E 2006, 73, 051601. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.73.051601
Go to reference 33
33.Weng, Y.-Y.; Si, J.-W.; Gao, W.-T.; Wu, Z.; Wang, M.; Peng, R.-W.; Ming, N.-B. Phys. Rev. E 2006, 73, 051601. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.73.051601
Go to reference 33
34.Elechiguerra, J. L.; Larios-Lopez, L.; Liu, C.; Garcia-Gutierrez, D.; Camacho-Bragado, A.; Yacaman, M. J. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 6042–6052. doi:10.1021/cm051532n
Go to reference 34
34.Elechiguerra, J. L.; Larios-Lopez, L.; Liu, C.; Garcia-Gutierrez, D.; Camacho-Bragado, A.; Yacaman, M. J. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 6042–6052. doi:10.1021/cm051532n
Go to reference 34
28.Wang, M.; Zhong, S.; Yin, X.-B.; Zhu, J.-M.; Peng, R.-W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, K.-Q.; Ming, N.-B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86, 3827. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3827
29.Zhong, S.; Koch, T.; Wang, M.; Scherer, T.; Walheim, S.; Hahn, H.; Schimmel, T. Small 2009, 5, 2265–2270. doi:10.1002/smll.200900746
30.Zhong, S.; Wang, D.; Koch, T.; Wang, M.; Walheim, S.; Schimmel, T. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010, 10, 1455–1459. doi:10.1021/cg9012747
31.Zhong, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhang, M.-Z.; Yin, X.-B.; Peng, R.-W.; Ming, N.-B. Phys. Rev. E 2003, 67, 061601. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.67.061601
Go to references 28-31
32.Bruinsma, O. S. L.; van der Eerden, J. P. Science and technology of crystal growth; Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1995.
Go to reference 32
28.Wang, M.; Zhong, S.; Yin, X.-B.; Zhu, J.-M.; Peng, R.-W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, K.-Q.; Ming, N.-B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86, 3827. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3827
31.Zhong, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhang, M.-Z.; Yin, X.-B.; Peng, R.-W.; Ming, N.-B. Phys. Rev. E 2003, 67, 061601. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.67.061601
Go to references 28,31
© 2014 Zhong et al; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjnano)