Remarkable electronic and optical anisotropy of layered 1T’-WTe2 2D materials

  1. Qiankun Zhang1ORCID Logo,
  2. Rongjie Zhang2,
  3. Jiancui Chen2,
  4. Wanfu Shen2,
  5. Chunhua An2,
  6. Xiaodong Hu2,
  7. Mingli Dong1,
  8. Jing Liu2 and
  9. Lianqing Zhu1

1School of Instrument Science and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, No.12 Xiaoying East Road, Beijing, China
2School of Precision Instrument and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin road, Tianjin 300072, China

  1. Corresponding author email

Associate Editor: P. Leiderer
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2019, 10, 1745–1753. doi:10.3762/bjnano.10.170
Received 17 Jan 2019, Accepted 01 Jul 2019, Published 20 Aug 2019

Abstract

Anisotropic 2D materials exhibit novel optical, electrical and thermoelectric properties that open possibilities for a great variety of angle-dependent devices. Recently, quantitative research on 1T’-WTe2 has been reported, revealing its fascinating physical properties such as non-saturating magnetoresistance, highly anisotropic crystalline structure and anisotropic optical/electrical response. Especially for its anisotropic properties, surging research interest devoted solely to understanding its structural and optical properties has been undertaken. Here we report quantitative, comprehensive work on the highly anisotropic, optical, electrical and optoelectronic properties of few-layer 1T’-WTe2 by azimuth-dependent reflectance difference microscopy, DC conductance measurements, as well as polarization-resolved and wavelength-dependent optoelectrical measurements. The electrical conductance anisotropic ratio is found to ≈103 for a thin 1T’-WTe2 film, while the optoelectronic anisotropic ratio is around 300 for this material. The polarization dependence of the photo-response is ascribed to the unique anisotropic in-plane crystal structure, consistent with the optical absorption anisotropy results. In general, 1T’-WTe2, with its highly anisotropic electrical and photoresponsivity reported here, demonstrates a route to exploit the intrinsic anisotropy of 2D materials and the possibility to open up new ways for applications of 2D materials for light polarization detection.

Keywords: 1T’-WTe2; 2D material; anisotropic; light polarization; optoelectrical

Introduction

The first exfoliation of graphene [1] attracted extensive interest in 2D materials such as black phosphorus (BP) [2,3], hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) [4,5] and transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) with a common chemical formula MX2 [6-10]. Due to the many excellent electronic, mechanical and optoelectronic properties, TMDCs are highly attractive for fundamental studies of novel physical phenomena and for applications ranging from electronics [11] and photonics [12,13] to sensing [14,15] and actuation [16] at the nanoscale.

Recently, tungsten telluride (WTe2), as a member of the TMDC family, has drawn tremendous research interest since the discovery of its large non-saturating positive magnetoresistance (MR) behavior, which was attributed to its perfect electron–hole compensation. Theoretical calculations and experiments have indicated that WTe2 has a complicated electronic structure with more than two bands presenting at the Fermi level [17]. Meanwhile, it was believed to a wonderful candidate for the type-II Weyl semimetal [18] and quantum spin Hall insulator material [19]. Additionally, many other remarkable properties of WTe2 have also been revealed, such as the temperature-driven Lifshitz transition [20], pressure-induced superconductivity [21], linear Nernst response [22], etc. Interestingly, although all of the TMDCs have the same formula, the atomic structure of 1T’-phase WTe2 is totally different from the other TMDCs. 1T’-WTe2 exhibits a distorted structure relative to the 1T’ phase. Both Raman [23,24] and first-principles [25,26] calculations have been used to indicate that monolayer 1T’-WTe2 has a highly in-plane anisotropic crystal structure, in addition to anisotropic electrical, thermal and optical properties [23-26]. However, most of the results are based on theoretical demonstrations of the anisotropic phenomenon, rather than further quantitative data for the characterization the natural anisotropy of 1T’-WTe2.

In this paper, we present a combined experimental and quantitative study on the anisotropic optical and electronic properties of mechanically isolated 1T’-WTe2. Through a systematic characterization including Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and azimuth-dependent reflectance difference microscopy (ADRDM), we firstly identified the 1T’-phase WTe2 to have an optical anisotropic crystal structure. Secondly, a 12-electrode-structure was designed for the evaluation the electrical anisotropy of 1T’-WTe2, and the results demonstrated up to 103 times relative electrical anisotropy. Subsequently, the photo-electrical conductance was studied to further explore the anisotropic photo-electric property. Our results revealed an anisotropic photo-electrical conductance with a maximum ratio of 4.33 among the 12 directions. Finally, a photodetector with twelve electrodes was used to distinguish the different wavelengths in the visible spectrum, demonstrating that 1T’-WTe2 shows promising application as an anisotropic photodetector.

Results and Discussion

Characterization of 1T’- WTe2

Figure 1a shows the typical orthorhombic crystalline structure of 1T’-WTe2. The tungsten atoms deviate from the ideal octahedral sites in the octahedron due to the very strong chemical bonding, forming the distorted octahedral structure. Consequently, the Te atom layers become buckled in the distorted octahedral structure.

[2190-4286-10-170-1]

Figure 1: Topological phase and characterization of 1T’-WTe2. a) Side and top views of lattice structures of 1T’-WTe2. Brown spheres: tellurium atoms, blue spheres: tungsten atoms. b) XPS spectrum of W 4f (green line) and Te 3d (red line) peaks. c) TEM image and SEAD pattern of WTe2, revealing the crystal structure of the 1T’ phase, with lattice parameters a ≈ 3.49 Å and b ≈ 6.32 Å, respectively. d) Raman spectrum of a 1T’-WTe2 flake.

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed to verify the elemental distribution and the bonding types of the exfoliated 1T’-WTe2 nanoflakes. The prominent W 4f peaks were observed at 31.3 eV and 33.5 eV, corresponding to 4f7/2, and 4f5/2, respectively, of the W–Te bonds (Figure 1b left in green), while the Te 3d spectrum has two peaks at 572.7 eV (3d5/2) and 582.9 eV (3d3/2), respectively, corresponding to W–Te bonds (Figure 1b right in red) [27]. The crystalline parameters of WTe2 were further studied through transmission electron microscopy (TEM), where a typical high-resolution TEM image displayed in Figure 1c shows the distorted 1T’ atomic phase, and the selected area electron diffraction (SEAD) pattern illustrated in Figure 1c, which demonstrates the rectangular symmetry of 1T’-WTe2 with space group Pmn21. Furthermore, graphene diffraction spots were utilized for calibrating the SAED pattern, and we measured the lattice parameters to be a ≈ 3.49 Å and b ≈ 6.32 Å, respectively, which are in excellent agreement with a previous report [28]. In order to gain further information on the crystal structure, Raman spectroscopy was performed on 1T’-WTe2 nanosheets, as shown Figure 1d. All of the peak positions are consistent with those reported from exfoliated thin nanosheet samples previously reported [29,30]. Additionally, a similar negative-direction shift of the peak positions is witnessed as the sample thickness increases [29].

Anisotropic crystal structure identification by azimuth-dependent reflectance difference microscopy (ADRDM)

The optical anisotropy of 1T’-WTe2 was characterized by ADRDM. The ADRDM measurements were conducted by measuring the normalized reflectance difference of two arbitrary orthogonal directions at normal incidence, which can provide a direct, accurate visualization of the anisotropy of low-symmetry 2D materials. In detail, when linearly polarized incident light impinges onto the 1T’-WTe2 crystal, as expected, an obvious phase retardance (Δδ) and reflectance difference (ΔR) appears between the two optical axes. The significant reflectance difference along the x- (Rx) and y- (Ry) axis is defined by the following formula [30]:

[2190-4286-10-170-i1]
(1)

where x and y are the reference orientations of the ADRDM measurement setup. When we change the relative direction θ (incidence angle) between the ADRDM and the orthorhombic crystal, this results in a dimensionless value N(θ), which periodically varies with θ in the following way:

[2190-4286-10-170-i2]
(2)

where R2 and R1 are the reflectance coefficients associated with the natural orthorhombic crystal.

To characterize the optical anisotropy, a few layered 1T’-WTe2 flake was mechanically exfoliated and transferred onto a pre-cleaned Si/SiO2 wafer, and atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to measure the selected two areas as shown in Figure 2a. Then the ADRDM measurement was conducted by rotating the incident angle (θ) of polarization from 0° to 360°, and the different values of N(θ) are displayed in Figure 2b as a function of incident angle. The absolute values of N were taken from the two selected areas of the 1T’-WTe2 sample, indicating a highly different reflectance with the incident angle variation. Meanwhile, Figure 2c shows the ADRDM images, which were taken at different angles with N(θ) changes plotted in color scale. Both the quantitative and the visualization results demonstrate that 1T’-WTe2 is crystalline with a highly anisotropic optical property.

[2190-4286-10-170-2]

Figure 2: Identification of the lattice anisotropy of an exfoliated 1T’-WTe2 flake. a) AFM image of the 1T’-WTe2 flake transferred onto a Si/SiO2 substrate by mechanical exfoliation. The heights of zone 1 and zone 2 are 16.36 nm and 5.25 nm, respectively. b) ADRDM results of the same WTe2 flake (Figure 1a) in polar coordinates. c) Azimuth-dependent RDM images.

Angle-resolved DC conductance

As mentioned above, 1T’-WTe2 has a distorted orthorhombic crystal structure, which is distinctly anisotropic. According to standard mobility theory, the intrinsic mobility may be influenced by anisotropic acoustic phonon scatter and elliptic elastic constants (both are relevant to the anisotropic crystalline structure) [31]. One of the consequences of an anisotropic carrier mobility is the anisotropic resistance. Therefore, we also performed angle-resolved DC conductance measurements on the 1T’-WTe2 flake. In detail, first we mechanically exfoliated a few-layer hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) flake onto a cleaned Si/SiO2 (400 μm/285 nm) substrate with pre-fabricated metal pads (20 nm Gr/180nm Au), then the same process was conducted to transfer a 1T’-WTe2 flake onto a h-BN film under an optical microscope. This was followed by e-beam lithography and lift-off processing, where 12 electrodes (20 nm Gr/40 nm Au) were fabricated on the same 1T’-WTe2 flake spaced at an angle of 30° along a chosen reference direction (0°) as shown in Figure 3a. Two strategies were taken to ensure consistent contact resistance: 1) samples with uniform thickness were selected for device fabrication under the microscope; 2) a constant angular velocity (10 rpm) was kept when we evaporated electrodes onto the samples.

[2190-4286-10-170-3]

Figure 3: Angle-resolved DC conductivity of a 1T’-WTe2 thin film. a) Optical image of s WTe2 flake with 12 electrodes spaced 30° apart. b) and c) are the transfer characteristic curves and the output characteristic curves, respectively. d) Angle-resolved DC resistance presented as a radar map.

To perform the angle-resolved DC conductance measurements, a fixed electrode was chosen and defined as the reference electrode (RE), and a constant bias voltage (50 mV) was alternately applied between the other 11 test electrodes (TEs) and the reference electrode. In addition, each pair of diagonally positioned electrodes were separated by 10 μm at 180° apart and the transfer characteristic curves and the output characteristic curves were plotted in Figure 3b and Figure 3c, respectively, consist with the variation of test angles from 0° to 180°. All the obvious angle-dependent linear curves demonstrate the semi-metal phase and anisotropic electrical property of 1T’-WTe2. Figure 3d shows the angle-resolved resistance in radar coordinates (where θ is the angle with respect to the 0° reference electrode), which was displayed to highlight the large resistance along one direction of the sample. From the fitted data, the ratio of the maximum and the minimum resistance is extracted to be around 103, indicating a highly anisotropic DC conductance of 1T’-WTe2, which indicates its promising application for electronic-related sensors.

Wavelength- and polarization-resolved photoelectronic properties

The photoelectric nature of the of 1T’-WTe2 material was further probed by performing I–V measurements at room temperature in a dark environment, as presented in Figure 4a and Figure 4b. We swept the source–drain bias voltage from 0 mV to 10 mV, with a standard wavelength-tunable laser (beam diameter: 10 mm) illuminating the 1T’-WTe2 conductive channel. The illumination power was held at fixed power of 1.4 mW (power density: 1.78 mW/cm2). Then a strategy similar to the above-mentioned DC test was implemented to obtain the wavelength-dependent photocurrent. As is shown in Figure 4a and Figure 4b, in contrast to the current in dark environment (Idark), both 0° and 60° Ids curves show a distinguishable increase in the incident wavelength variation from 500 to 750 nm, which indicates a positive, wavelength-related photoconductance of the 1T’-WTe2 device. On the other hand, a different response amplitude of the same illumination wavelength in terms of the different test TE/RE pairs of 0° and 60°, respectively, can be observed by comparing Figure 4a with Figure 4b. Thus, the angle-dependent photosensitivity can be observed from the two figures.

[2190-4286-10-170-4]

Figure 4: Wavelength- and angle-dependent photoelectric properties of 1T’-WTe2. a,b) The I–V curves of test angles at 0° and 60°, respectively, with incident wavelength varying from 500 to 750 nm. The incident power was set at 1.4 mW. c) IV curves of different test angles (from 0° to 150°) with incident wavelength at 633 nm and power at 1.4 mW. d) Angle-resolved photosensitivity of 1T’-WTe2 in polar coordinates (wavelength: 633 nm).

To further probe the angle-resolved photosensitivity of our device, we first held the incident laser at fixed values (wavelength: 633 nm, power 1.4 mW), then swept the source–drain voltage from 0 mV to 10 mV, and varied the angle of the TE/RE pairs from 0° to 150°. The results are presented in Figure 4c. As the test angle was changed, the Ids increased to different degrees. Furthermore, an increase in the drain current by a factor of ≈15 was observed related to the test angles at 60° and 150°, respectively, which indicates the highly anisotropic photosensitivity of our device based on 1T’-WTe2. Additionally, the photosensitivity was defined as:

[2190-4286-10-170-i3]
(3)

where Rph is the photoresponsivity, Ion and Idark are the current in the laser on and off state, respectively, and P is the power of the illumination laser. A more detailed observation of the polarization-resolved photosensitivity in terms of the test angle of the TE/RE pairs with variation from 0° to 360° is displayed in Figure 4d. The dramatic fluctuation of Rph for all the test angles can be observed from the scatter symbols. The ratio of maximum/minimum value of photosensitivity reaches up to 10.7, which is attributed to the comprehensive effect of anisotropic photoelectricity and highly confined energy dispersion in 1T’-WTe2 [32]. Thus, the anisotropic photoresponsivity implies that 1T’-WTe2 has great promise for future photodetector applications.

Angle- and wavelength-dependent photodetector

To evaluate the potential application of 1T’-WTe2 as a photoelectric sensor we also performed another angle-resolved photoelectric measurement. In this test, we first fixed the incident wavelength at 633 nm and the power at 1.4 mW. Then a strategy comparable with the above-mentioned electronic test was performed to get the angle-resolved photocurrent with bias voltage of 5 mV. The real-time response curves are presented in Figure 5a, in which a more distinct photoelectric effect can be observed under the daylight illumination using a household lamp. Meanwhile, a rapid increase and decrease in current reached the saturation value and the minimum value within about 200 ms, achieved by switching the laser on and off. Figure 5b shows the magnified change of the 60° photocurrent curve achieved by changing the laser state from off to on. Due to the more abundant laser-generated carriers, distinguishable fluctuations of the current values were obtained when the test angles of TE/RE pairs were varied from 0° to 150°. More detailed observations of the photosensitivity yield (Rph = (IonI)/P) is presented in Figure 5c, which not only offers further evidence for highly angle-resolved photoelectricity of 1T’-WTe2, but also it means a potential application for an angle-dependent photodetector is promising.

[2190-4286-10-170-5]

Figure 5: Angle-resolved photocurrent response of the photodetector based on 1T’-WTe2. a) Real-time photocurrent response of different test angles (from 0° to 150°, spaced at 30° apart) under the following conditions: Vds = 5 mV, incident power = 1.4 mW, incident wavelength = 633 nm. b) The magnified photocurrent response of test angle at 60° with a response time of around 200 ms. c) Angle-resolved photosensitivity of the photodetector.

Subsequently, we further studied the wavelength-dependent photodetector fabricated using 1T’-WTe2. In detail, a constant power value scale was set at 900 μW, and the incident wavelength of illumination laser was varied from 500 to 750 nm. Then we carried out the measurement along the two different TE/RE pairs of 30° and 150° with bias voltage at 5 mV, and the Ids curves are displayed in Figure 6a and 6b. As observed from the two figures, the value scales of the basic current along 30° and 150° are around 4.0 nA and 1.2 μA, respectively, due of the anisotropic absorption of light. Although the basic current induced by daylight illumination turned out to be a non-negligible, the photocurrent changed immediately when the laser state was alternately switched between on and off. Both the response and recovery time are around 200 ms. Furthermore, a distinguishable wavelength-resolved phenomenon can be observed from the two figures. Thus, the 1T’-WTe2 material can be used for wavelength-dependent photodetectors.

[2190-4286-10-170-6]

Figure 6: Wavelength-resolved photocurrent response of the photodetector fabricated with 1T’-WTe2. a,b) The real-time and photocurrent response of different test angles at 30° and 150°, with incident wavelength variation from 500 to 750 nm.

Conclusion

In summary, with the combination of XPS spectroscopy, HR-TEM, Raman spectroscopy, ADRDM and angle-resolved electrical measurements, we successfully revealed the in-plane optical and electrical anisotropy of 2D layered 1T’-WTe2. Furthermore, we presented the highly anisotropic photoelectric property in detail, showing a 300-fold improvement in the photosensitivity. Moreover, due to its attractive properties, mono- or few-layer 1T’-WTe2 was shown to be a promising, novel and fascinating material for high-performance magnetoresistance applications in thin-film electromagnetics [33-35]. In addition, its highly anisotropic properties hold promise for a new direction in the development of angle-resolved optoelectronic and electronic devices. For instance, 1T’-WTe2 is a natural material for designing polarizers and polarization sensors in the broadband spectral range because of its semi-metal bandgap structure and high anisotropy. In addition to angle-dependent photodetectors, its angle-resolved photoelectric properties may permit the development of plasmonic devices in which the surface plasmon polariton frequency has a highly directional dependence on the wave vector. Besides, the semi-metal bandgap structure allows various energy band engineering methods [36,37] to be explored for the promising application in electronic and photonic devices [38-41].

In general, due to its highly anisotropic nature, 1T’-WTe2 offers optimistic prospects for the applications in novel device concepts by utilizing its angle-resolved and wavelength-dependent properties.

Methods

Exfoliation and characterization of 1T’-WTe2 flakes

The 1T’-WTe2 single crystals were purchased from XianFeng Nano Corporation. A blue film was used to exfoliate 1T’-WTe2 onto the N++-doped Si substrate covered with 285 nm of SiO2 for Raman spectroscopy, ADRDM and electrical characterization. The substrate had pre-patterned alignment grids and 12 electrodes (20 nm Gr/180 nm Au). XPS analysis was performed on a VG Scientific ESCALAB 250 device. The TEM images and SAED patterns were performed with on a FEI Tecnai F20 platform with an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. A HORIBA HR800 Raman spectrometer equipped with a 532 nm wavelength laser was used for the Raman spectroscopy analysis. Additionally, the thickness of 1T’-WTe2 was confirmed using AFM (Bruker Dimension Icon) based on the sample thickness.

Electrical characterization

All of the electrical characterization experiments were performed using a Keysight B1500A semiconductor device analyzer and a probe station with micromanipulation probes.

Acknowledgements

This project has been supported by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grant Nos. 21405109) and Seed Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments (Pilt No. 1710), Tianjin research program of application foundation and advanced technology (15JCZJC31600).

References

  1. Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K.; Morozov, S. V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S. V.; Grigorieva, I. V.; Firsov, A. A. Science 1999, 1906, 666–670. doi:10.1038/nature04233
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Li, L.; Yu, Y.; Ye, G. J.; Ge, Q.; Ou, X.; Wu, H.; Feng, D.; Chen, X. H.; Zhang, Y. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 372–377. doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.35
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Xia, F.; Wang, H.; Jia, Y. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, No. 4458. doi:10.1038/ncomms5458
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Preobrajenski, A. B.; Vinogradov, A. S.; Mårtensson, N. Surf. Sci. 2005, 582, 21–30. doi:10.1016/j.susc.2005.02.047
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Morscher, M.; Corso, M.; Greber, T.; Osterwalder, J. Surf. Sci. 2006, 600, 3280–3284. doi:10.1016/j.susc.2006.06.016
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Ruppert, C.; Aslan, O. B.; Heinz, T. F. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6231–6236. doi:10.1021/nl502557g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Lin, Y.-F.; Xu, Y.; Wang, S.-T.; Li, S.-L.; Yamamoto, M.; Aparecido-Ferreira, A.; Li, W.; Sun, H.; Nakaharai, S.; Jian, W.-B.; Ueno, K.; Tsukagoshi, K. Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 2014, 26, 3263–3269. doi:10.1002/adma.201305845
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Chiritescu, C.; Cahill, D. G.; Nguyen, N.; Johnson, D.; Bodapati, A.; Keblinski, P.; Zschack, P. Science 2007, 315, 351–353. doi:10.1126/science.1136494
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Splendiani, A.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, T.; Kim, J.; Chim, C.-Y.; Galli, G.; Wang, F. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1271–1275. doi:10.1021/nl903868w
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Radisavljevic, B.; Radenovic, A.; Brivio, J.; Giacometti, V.; Kis, A. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 147–150. doi:10.1038/nnano.2010.279
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Fiori, G.; Bonaccorso, F.; Iannaccone, G.; Palacios, T.; Neumaier, D.; Seabaugh, A.; Banerjee, S. K.; Colombo, L. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 768–779. doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.207
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Wang, Q. H.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Kis, A.; Coleman, J. N.; Strano, M. S. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 699–712. doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.193
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Mak, K. F.; Shan, J. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 216–226. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.282
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Yang, S.; Jiang, C.; Wei, S.-h. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2017, 4, 021304. doi:10.1063/1.4983310
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Varghese, S.; Varghese, S.; Swaminathan, S.; Singh, K.; Mittal, V. Electronics (Basel, Switz.) 2015, 4, 651–687. doi:10.3390/electronics4030651
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Come, J.; Black, J. M.; Lukatskaya, M. R.; Naguib, M.; Beidaghi, M.; Rondinone, A. J.; Kalinin, S. V.; Wesolowski, D. J.; Gogotsi, Y.; Balke, N. Nano Energy 2015, 17, 27–35. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.07.028
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Pletikosić, I.; Ali, M. N.; Fedorov, A. V.; Cava, R. J.; Valla, T. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 216601. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.216601
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Feng, B.; Chan, Y.-H.; Feng, Y.; Liu, R.-Y.; Chou, M.-Y.; Kuroda, K.; Yaji, K.; Harasawa, A.; Moras, P.; Barinov, A.; Malaeb, W.; Bareille, C.; Kondo, T.; Shin, S.; Komori, F.; Chiang, T.-C.; Shi, Y.; Matsuda, I. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 195134. doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.195134
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Zheng, F.; Cai, C.; Ge, S.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; Lu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Qiu, J.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Jia, S.; Qi, J.; Chen, J.-H.; Sun, D.; Feng, J. Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 2016, 28, 4845–4851. doi:10.1002/adma.201600100
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Wu, Y.; Jo, N. H.; Ochi, M.; Huang, L.; Mou, D.; Bud’ko, S. L.; Canfield, P. C.; Trivedi, N.; Arita, R.; Kaminski, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 115, 166602. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.166602
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Pan, X.-C.; Chen, X.; Liu, H.; Feng, Y.; Wei, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Chi, Z.; Pi, L.; Yen, F.; Song, F.; Wan, X.; Yang, Z.; Wang, B.; Wang, G.; Zhang, Y. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7805. doi:10.1038/ncomms8805
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Zhu, Z.; Lin, X.; Liu, J.; Fauqué, B.; Tao, Q.; Yang, C.; Shi, Y.; Behnia, K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 176601. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.176601
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Song, Q.; Pan, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, K.; Tan, Q.; Li, P.; Wan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, X.; Lin, M.; Wan, X.; Song, F.; Dai, L. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29254. doi:10.1038/srep29254
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  24. Kong, W.-D.; Wu, S.-F.; Richard, P.; Lian, C.-S.; Wang, J.-T.; Yang, C.-L.; Shi, Y.-G.; Ding, H. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 081906. doi:10.1063/1.4913680
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  25. Torun, E.; Sahin, H.; Cahangirov, S.; Rubio, A.; Peeters, F. M. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 119, 074307. doi:10.1063/1.4942162
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  26. Xu, K.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Peng, B.; Shao, H.; Ni, G.; Li, J.; Yao, M.; Lu, H.; Zhu, H.; Soukoulis, C. M. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 30351–30364. doi:10.1039/c8cp05522j
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  27. Tang, S.; Zhang, C.; Wong, D.; Pedramrazi, Z.; Tsai, H.-Z.; Jia, C.; Moritz, B.; Claassen, M.; Ryu, H.; Kahn, S.; Jiang, J.; Yan, H.; Hashimoto, M.; Lu, D.; Moore, R. G.; Hwang, C.-C.; Hwang, C.; Hussain, Z.; Chen, Y.; Ugeda, M. M.; Liu, Z.; Xie, X.; Devereaux, T. P.; Crommie, M. F.; Mo, S.-K.; Shen, Z.-X. Nat. Phys. 2017, 13, 683–687. doi:10.1038/nphys4174
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Tao, L.; Chen, K.; Chen, Z.; Cong, C.; Qiu, C.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Chen, H.; Yu, T.; Xie, W.; Deng, S.; Xu, J.-B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 8696–8704. doi:10.1021/jacs.8b02972
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Zhang, E.; Chen, R.; Huang, C.; Yu, J.; Zhang, K.; Wang, W.; Liu, S.; Ling, J.; Wan, X.; Lu, H.-Z.; Xiu, F. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 878–885. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04194
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  30. Tao, J.; Shen, W.; Wu, S.; Liu, L.; Feng, Z.; Wang, C.; Hu, C.; Yao, P.; Zhang, H.; Pang, W.; Duan, X.; Liu, J.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, D. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 11362–11370. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b05151
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  31. Lang, H.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Z. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 235306. doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.235306
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Wang, Q.; Yesilyurt, C.; Liu, F.; Siu, Z. B.; Cai, K.; Kumar, D.; Liu, Z.; Jalil, M. B. A.; Yang, H. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 2647–2652. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00513
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Ali, M. N.; Xiong, J.; Flynn, S.; Tao, J.; Gibson, Q. D.; Schoop, L. M.; Liang, T.; Haldolaarachchige, N.; Hirschberger, M.; Ong, N. P.; Cava, R. J. Nature 2014, 514, 205–208. doi:10.1038/nature13763
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Kong, W.-D.; Wu, S.-F.; Richard, P.; Lian, C.-S.; Wang, J.-T.; Yang, C.-L.; Shi, Y.-G.; Ding, H. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 081906. doi:10.1063/1.4913680
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Zhang, E.; Chen, R.; Huang, C.; Yu, J.; Zhang, K.; Wang, W.; Liu, S.; Ling, J.; Wan, X.; Lu, H.-Z.; Xiu, F. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 878–885. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04194
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Han, M. Y.; Özyilmaz, B.; Zhang, Y.; Kim, P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 206805. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.206805
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Gong, Y.; Liu, Z.; Lupini, A. R.; Shi, G.; Lin, J.; Najmaei, S.; Lin, Z.; Elías, A. L.; Berkdemir, A.; You, G.; Terrones, H.; Terrones, M.; Vajtai, R.; Pantelides, S. T.; Pennycook, S. J.; Lou, J.; Zhou, W.; Ajayan, P. M. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 442–449. doi:10.1021/nl4032296
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Chan, C.-K.; Lindner, N. H.; Refael, G.; Lee, P. A. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 041104. doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.041104
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Xu, S.-Y.; Ma, Q.; Shen, H.; Fatemi, V.; Wu, S.; Chang, T.-R.; Chang, G.; Valdivia, A. M. M.; Chan, C.-K.; Gibson, Q. D.; Zhou, J.; Liu, Z.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Lin, H.; Cava, R. J.; Fu, L.; Gedik, N.; Jarillo-Herrero, P. Nat. Phys. 2018, 14, 900–906. doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0189-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Seifert, P.; Sigger, F.; Kiemle, J.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kastl, C.; Wurstbauer, U.; Holleitner, A. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 99, 161403. doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.161403
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Zhou, W.; Chen, J.; Gao, H.; Hu, T.; Ruan, S.; Stroppa, A.; Ren, W. Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 2019, 31, 1804629. doi:10.1002/adma.201804629
    Return to citation in text: [1]

Interesting articles

Ionel Stavarache, Valentin Adrian Maraloiu, Petronela Prepelita and Gheorghe Iordache

Carla Aramo, Antonio Ambrosio, Michelangelo Ambrosio, Maurizio Boscardin, Paola Castrucci, Michele Crivellari, Marco Cilmo, Maurizio De Crescenzi, Francesco De Nicola, Emanuele Fiandrini, Valentina Grossi, Pasqualino Maddalena, Maurizio Passacantando, Sandro Santucci, Manuela Scarselli and Antonio Valentini

Urszula Klekotka, Magdalena Rogowska, Dariusz Satuła and Beata Kalska-Szostko

© 2019 Zhang et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular requires that the authors and source are credited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjnano)

 
Back to Article List