Dielectric properties of a bisimidazolium salt with dodecyl sulfate anion doped with carbon nanotubes

  1. Doina Manaila Maximean1,
  2. Viorel Cîrcu2ORCID Logo and
  3. Constantin Paul Ganea3

1University Politehnica of Bucharest, Department of Physics, 313 Spl. Independentei, 060042, Bucharest, Romania
2Department of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Bucharest, 23 Dumbrava Rosie st, sector 2, Bucharest 020464, Romania
3National Institute of Materials Physics, POBox MG 07, 077125 Magurele, Romania

  1. Corresponding author email

This article is part of the Thematic Series "Nanostructured liquid crystal systems and applications".

Guest Editor: A. Emelyanenko
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 164–174. doi:10.3762/bjnano.9.19
Received 22 Aug 2017, Accepted 20 Dec 2017, Published 16 Jan 2018


A new bisimidazolium salt with dodecyl sulfate as counterion has been designed and prepared. This salt shows a SmA phase that is stable at room temperature. The new ionic liquid crystal (ILC) was characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR and IR spectroscopy. Its liquid crystalline properties were analyzed by polarizing optical microscopy (POM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies. The dielectric spectra of the ILC doped with different concentrations of carbon nanotubes (CNT) were recorded over a wide frequency and temperature range of 10−1 to 107 Hz and 293–338 K, respectively. The values of the activation energy were found in the range of 0.46–0.61 eV; the characteristic time was obtained by fitting the spectra of the dielectric loss with the Havriliak–Negami functions. As a result of doping the ILC with CNT, the electric conductivity increases significantly. Ionic conductivity is dominant and it was indirectly observed through the electrode polarization (EP) effect. The very high dielectric permittivity values and the decrease of the electric conductivity at low frequencies confirm the presence of EP.

Keywords: activation energy; carbon nanotubes; dielectric spectroscopy; ionic liquid crystal; relaxation time


Ionic liquid crystals (ILCs) represent a very appealing class of materials that has found various recent applications in dye-sensitized solar cells, battery materials, electrochemical sensors or energy storage devices. Their interesting properties result from the combination of liquid crystal (LC) and ionic liquid (IL) properties. The recent progress and development in the field of ILCs were reviewed in several publications [1-3]. There is a growing interest in ILs based on imidazolium cations. Particular attention is paid to the flexibly or rigidly linked bisimidazolium salts, the so-called gemini ILs. Gemini ILs can show interesting surfactant and liquid crystalline properties [4-12] and such salts were used in many applications, ranging from catalysis [13] to biological [14-16] or biochemical applications [17-19]. Recently, we have shown that it is possible to exchange the smaller anions (Br) with alkyl sulfate ions to yield new ILCs based on bisimidazolium salts with flexible methylene spacer and long alkyl tails [20]. The LC properties are influenced, in the order of impact, by spacer length, alkyl tail length and, finally, by the length of alkyl chains attached to the sulfate groups [21]. Furthermore, the liquid crystalline compounds with alkyl sulfate anions have lower melting and clearing points. Hence, there is the interest to design such materials for further electro-optical applications [22-32].


Figure 1: Schematic representation of the bilayer interdigitated SmA phase of the ILC based on bisimidazolium salts with alkyl sulfate ion.

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and nanoparticles were also dispersed in LCs [33-36]. It is well-known that the order of the LCs can be imposed on the CNTs in such a way that the alignment axis of the CNTs is driven by the LC reorientation controlled by an electric field [37]. The concentration and the spatial distribution of charges in the LC matrix will be affected by the presence of CNTs and, hence, the conductivity will be changed [38-44].

There are studies dedicated to the dielectric spectroscopy (DS) of ILCs doped with CNT [45]. In the present work we studied the effect of added CNTs on the dielectric properties of a new ILC based on a bisimidazolium salt with a dodecyl sulfate ion. The dielectric spectra of pure and CNT-doped ILC were recorded in the frequency range from 10−1 to 107 Hz and in the temperature range from 293 to 338 K corresponding to the different phases of the ILC (mesophase and isotropic state). The values of the permittivity, dielectric loss and conductivity were deduced from the dielectric studies. The activation energy was calculated by employing the Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann law while the characteristic time was obtained by fitting the spectra of the dielectric loss with the Havriliak–Negami functions.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of the bisimidazolium salt

The preparation of new bisimidazolium salt with dodecyl sulfate anion employed in this study, along with the numbering scheme of intermediates, is presented in Scheme 1.


Scheme 1: Synthesis of bisimidazolium salt with dodecyl sulfate anion: (i) Br(CH2)10Br, NaH; (ii) C8H17Br, acetonitrile; (iii) C12H25OSO3Na, methanol/dichloromethane.

In the first step 1,1′-(1,10-hexanediyl)bisimidazole (1) was prepared starting from imidazole and 1,10-dibromodecane, as described by Bara and co-workers [7]. The bromide salt 2 was prepared by alkylation of 1 with 1-bromooctane in acetonitrile under reflux. The product was precipitated with ethyl ether, and purified by several recrystallizations from dichloromethane/ethyl ether. The metathesis reaction of the bromide anion with sodium dodecyl sulfate, C12H25OSO3Na, yielded the corresponding salt [bisC8ImC10][C12H25OSO3]2 (3). Compound 3 was characterized by several physico-chemical techniques, such as elemental analysis (C, H, N), IR, 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy, supporting the proposed structure. The exchange of bromide anion with dodecyl sulfate ion was easily confirmed by IR spectroscopy. The IR spectrum of [bisC8ImC10][C12H25OSO3]2 shows a strong band at 1225 cm−1 assigned to the sulfate group. Moreover, the 1H and 13C NMR spectra give additional support for the exchange of bromide ions with dodecyl sulfate ions. The signals assigned to the three protons belonging to the two imidazolium rings are shifted upfield in the 1H NMR spectrum of [bisC8ImC10][C12H25OSO3]2 compared to their position in the 1H NMR of the bromide salt 2. The most significant change was observed for the signal assigned to the proton adjacent to the two nitrogen atoms (Scheme 1). For the bromide salt 2 this signal is located at 10.42 ppm, while for the dodecyl sulfate salt [bisC8ImC10][C12H25OSO3]2 this signal is shifted to 9.58 ppm. It is well documented that the anion–cation interactions have a strong effect on the NMR chemical shifts of protons belonging to the imidazolium ring. The NMR signals are shifted downfield due to the presence of hydrogen-bonding interactions in imidazolium-based ILC systems [32,46-51].

Polarized optical microscopy (POM)

The LC phase of [bisC8ImC10][C12H25OSO3]2 was determined based on the POM observations. Two different pictures of the textures developed on cooling from the isotropic state are shown in Figure 2. These observations were confirmed later by XRD studies. On cooling the sample from the isotropic state, typical fan-shape or focal conic textures together with several homeotropic areas were found, leading to an unambiguously assignment of a SmA phase. ILCs are well known to exhibit predominantly lamellar phases, with the SmA phase being the most common phase for such materials, in particular due to electrostatic interactions and ion–ion stacking in ILCs.


Figure 2: POM pictures of [bisC8ImC10][C12H25OSO3]2 on cooling from the isotropic state: at 318 K (a) and at 303 K (b).

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)

The transitions and their corresponding temperatures together with the enthalpy values associated to these processes are presented in Figure 3. The transitions of [bisC8ImC10][C12H25OSO3]2 between mesophase and isotropic state observed by DSC are broad, with Tonset = 321.15 K. The temperature range of the liquid crystalline phase is limited to approx. 10 K during the heating run. The first heating run of the bisimidazolium salt shows a broad peak including the transition from the crystalline state to the LC phase and the following transition to the isotropic state, giving only the combined enthalpy of the two processes. However, POM observations clearly indicated that the two transformations are well separated. The following cooling run shows the Iso-SmA phase transition at 321.15 K followed by a second transition at 285.15 K, which was assigned to a transition from the LC phase to a different crystalline phase (Cr′). This second Cr′ phase is not thermodynamically stable at room temperature and it transitions to the first crystalline phase at 287.15 K during the subsequent heating run (in fact, it is a melting transition followed by the cold crystallization to the Cr phase). The following heating–cooling cycles are perfectly reproducible with the two transitions Cr–SmA and SmA–Iso well separated during the heating runs (Figure 3b). Importantly, POM observations show that on cooling from the isotropic state, the SmA phase is stable down to room temperature over time with a slow crystallization occurring over the course of hours based on POM observations. Obviously, the stability domain of the SmA phase is higher (ca. 36 K) during the cooling step, allowing for precise dielectric measurements in the LC phase.


Figure 3: DSC traces for [bisC8ImC10][C12H25OSO3]2: (a) first and (b) second heating–cooling cycle recorded in the temperature range of 273–353 K with a scan rate of 10 K/min. Thermal parameters are given in brackets. The given enthalpy contains the combined values for the two transitions Cr–SmA and SmA–Iso.

Powder X-ray diffraction measurements

The nature of the LC phase was unequivocally confirmed by powder X-ray diffraction measurements. The XRD measurements were performed at 298 K after the sample was previously heated at 333 K to reach the isotropic state and then cooled down to room temperature in the mesophase temperature domain. The results are presented in Figure 4. The XRD pattern of [bisC8ImC10][C12H25OSO3]2 salt shows one sharp and intense diffraction peak in the small-angle region (27.3 Å) and a second broad peak at wide angles (around 4.5 Å). The first peak was assigned to the (001) reflection corresponding to a lamellar structure while the broad peak is due to the liquid-like order of the molten alkyl chains.


Figure 4: Powder XRD pattern of [bisC8ImC10][C12H25OSO3]2 recorded at 298 K, after cooling from the isotropic state. Inset: the XRD pattern recorded at 298 K in the crystalline state (prior to heating).

The results of a simple molecular calculation based on an all-trans extended model revealed a molecular length of about 39 Å. Indeed, by comparison of the experimental value of the layer thickness (27.3 Å) with the molecular length resulting from molecular calculations, it is justified to assume an interdigitated double layer structure for the SmA mesophase [4,20].

Dielectric spectroscopy

The DS measurements were performed both for the pure ILC and for various mixtures of CNT-doped ILC (concentration 0.05% w/w and 0.5% w/w) in the frequency range from 10−1 to 107 Hz. The temperature range was chosen in agreement with the DSC and the POM observations for the phase transitions, between 293 and 338 K.

The logarithmic permittivity for the pure ILC and the CNT-doped ILC as a function of the temperature is presented in Figure 5. It was found that the permittivity has higher values for the CNT-doped ILC and, in the range of 320–338 K, the plots of the permittivity for the 0.05% CNT and 0.5% CNT concentrations overlap.


Figure 5: Permittivity as a function of the temperature (logarithmic scale) for pure ILC (green solid squares), ILC doped with 0.05% CNTs (red open squares) and ILC doped with 0.5% CNTs (blue open circles).

The temperature variation of the dielectric loss for the pure ILC and the CNT-doped ILC is shown in Figure 6. It was found that the dielectric loss increases with the temperature and with the CNT concentration.


Figure 6: Dielectric loss as a function of the temperature (logarithmic scale) for pure ILC (green solid squares), ILC doped with 0.05% CNTs (red open squares) and ILC doped with 0.5% CNTs (blue open circles).

The characteristic relaxation times were obtained by fitting the spectra of the dielectric loss with the Havriliak–Negami (HN) function [52]:


where ε′(ω) is the permittivity and ε″(ω) is the dielectric loss, εLF is the low-frequency (LF) permittivity and ε is the permittivity in the high-frequency (HF) limit and τmax is the characteristic relaxation time of the dielectric relaxation process.

The dependency τmax = f(1/T) can be modeled using the Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann (VFT) law, as follows:


where A is a material constant, kB is Boltzmann’s constant, T is the temperature, TV is the Vogel temperature and τ is a pre-exponential factor.

Figure 7 presents the characteristic relaxation time as a function of the inverse temperature for the pure ILC and the CNT-doped ILC. For the pure ILC and for the lower CNT doping concentrations, there are two slopes, attributed to the isotropic and the SmA phases. At the higher CNT concentration (0.5%) the transition isotropic–SmA could not be detected clearly, probably due to the very low energies involved in the transition. In the isotropic phase, the curves of the relaxation time for the 0.05% CNT and 0.5% CNT concentrations overlap, and for lower temperatures, the relaxation time decreases with the CNT concentration. The pure ILC has a relaxation time higher than the doped ILC in the temperature range of the mesophase.


Figure 7: Relaxation time as function of the inverse temperature (logarithm scale) for pure ILC (green solid squares), ILC doped with 0.05% CNTs (red open squares) and ILC doped with 0.5% CNTs (blue open circles).

Table 1 gives the values of the activation energy and the relaxation times in the corresponding temperature domains. The following observations can be made according to data presented in Table 1: a) the activation energy increases with CNT concentration; b) for the same CNT concentration, the activation energy is smaller in the isotropic phase (at higher temperatures).

Table 1: DS characteristic constants for pure and CNT-doped ILC.

no. sample type temperature domain [K] activation energy, Eaa [eV] relaxation time, τmax [s]
1 pure ILC 296–317 0.61 5.500 × 10−13
323–338 0.49 1.700 × 10−11
2 ILC doped with 0.05% CNT 293–317 0.59 1.169 × 10−13
323–338 0.47 2.364 × 10−11
3 ILC doped with 0.5% CNT 309–338 0.46 3.105 × 10−11

aIn these calculations, the Vogel temperature was considered zero in the initial fitting. Hence, the VFT equation approximates an Arrhenius-like expression, the material constant A being incorporated into the activation energy Ea.

There are “jumps” in the characteristic relaxation time around certain temperatures such as 293–296 K for the CNT-doped samples and 314.15–323.15 K for the pure ILC and the 0.05% CNT doped sample (Figure 7). These jumps can be attributed either to the fitting procedure or to one or more phase transitions. The isotropic–SmA transition is found in the range of 314–323 K. In order to study this phenomenon, the permittivity and dielectric loss were plotted as functions of the frequency in the abovementioned temperature ranges. These curves are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9. The ILC permittivity as a function of the frequency has three distinct slopes, one between 10−1 and 102 Hz, one between 102 and 104 Hz and the third one between 104 and 107 Hz. This type of dependence also occurs for the CNT doping concentrations of 0.05% and 0.5%.


Figure 8: Permittivity and dielectric loss as functions of the frequency (logarithmic scale) for the pure ILC at two constant temperatures, 317 and 323 K.


Figure 9: Permittivity and dielectric loss as functions of the frequency (logarithmic scale) at different constant temperatures for (a,b) ILC with 0.05% CNTs, and (c,d) ILC with 0.5% CNTs.

The dielectric loss of the ILC can be divided in two regions, between 10−1 and 102 Hz and between 2·102 and 107 Hz (Figure 8). At lower temperatures, for the CNT- doped samples (Figure 9a,b), the straight lines with the greater slope are seen over a wider frequency range (more evident in Figure 9c, at 293 K). In the dielectric loss spectra, presented in Figure 8 and Figure 9, a dipolar relaxation process was identified in the range of 102–103 Hz, with only the descendent slope being observed. The Havriliak–Negami fitting function (Equation 1) are centered on this process. In the fitting procedure the exponent β was set to 1, and the other parameters were left optimized by fitting the HN function to the experimental data. It was found that the permittivity and the dielectric loss values increase with the temperature for pure ILC and for all CNT-doped samples.

The permittivity and the dielectric loss have high values in the LF domain, both for the pure and the doped-ILC. The high values in the range of 106–108 Hz are due to the presence of free ions. Figure 10 shows the variation of the real part of the conductivity as a function of the temperature for the ILC and the CNT-doped ILC. A linear dependency is observed, the change of the slope being attributed to the different phases. This behavior is more clearly observed for the ILC (solid squares) and the ILC doped with 0.05% CNTs (open squares). The conductivity increases with the CNT concentration.


Figure 10: Real part of the conductivity versus temperature for pure ILC and ILC doped with CNTs, at 10 kHz.

Figure 11 shows the real part of the conductivity of the pure ILC as a function of the frequency (logarithmic scale), at three different constant temperatures. An increase of the conductivity with CNT concentration and temperature is also observed as presented in Figure 12.


Figure 11: Real part of the conductivity as a function of the frequency (logarithmic scale) for the pure ILC, at three different constant temperatures. Region 1: low and very low frequency; region 2: medium frequency; region 3: high frequency.


Figure 12: Conductivity as a function of the CNT concentration at three constant temperatures.

Ionic conductibility

Two major polarizing mechanisms can be studied by means of DS: a) polarization due to orientation of permanent molecular electrical dipoles and b) polarization due to the movement of mobile charge carriers. Due to the presence of mobile charge carriers in LCs, a supplementary induced polarization needs to be considered when interpreting experimental data, namely the electrode polarization, resulting from charge accumulation at the electrode/sample interface.

Experimental data can be presented either by means of the complex dielectric function or of electric conductivity. The AC conductivity σ*(ω) is a complex function:


In agreement with Maxwell’s equations, a direct general relationship can be established between the electrical conductivity and the dielectric permittivity of a medium. For a sinusoidal electric field Equation 3 becomes:


The real and the imaginary parts are σ′(ω) = σ0 + ωε0ε″(ω) and σ″(ω) = ωε0ε′(ω), respectively.

As shown in Figure 11, at medium frequencies (103–105 Hz), the ac conductivity and permittivity spectra are controlled by ion movements in the bulk of the electrolyte. At low frequencies (10−1–103 Hz), approximately region 1 in Figure 11, the behavior is controlled by “electrode polarization” effects. Thus, the electric conductivity decreases significantly when the frequency decreases. In the frequency range below 100 MHz, the ionic conductivity spectra obey the Jonscher power law [52,53]:


where 0 < N ≤ 1 and σdc is the dc conductivity (usually 0.1 ≤ N ≤ 0.4). The parameter σdc is obtained from the electrical conductivity spectra by extrapolation to the ω→0 limit.

For samples with ionic carriers, obtaining the conductivity values, σdc, is not trivial [38,54,55]. In this case the effects of the electrode polarization and of the ionic conductivity overlap at medium and low frequencies in the conductivity spectra (Figure 11). The electric conductivity is σdc = q·μ·n, where q is the electrical charge (in C), n is the concentration (in cm−3), and μ is the mobility (in cm2·s−1·V−1).

The bulk electrical ionic conductivity σdc obeys the Arrhenius law [5]:


where T is the absolute temperature, B is a pre-exponential constant of the material and WA is a constant associated with the activation energy. Usually, the activation energy includes the energy terms for the formation and migration of ions.

The experimental results showed that the real part of the permittivity, ε′, representing the dielectric conductivity, increases with the increase of CNT concentration; the same behavior was seen for the imaginary part of the permittivity, ε″, representing the dielectric loss. The permittivity being linked to dipole movements, an increase of the CNT concentration will lead to possible sample heating. Moreover, the ionic conductivity, σ, increases with CNT concentration (Figure 12). In this way, additional heating results from an increase of the CNT concentration, this process being frequency dependent.


A new ILC based on bisimidazolium salt with a spacer of ten carbon atoms and octyl tails and dodecyl sulfate as counterion was synthesized. The SmA phase was unambiguously assigned based on polarized optical microscopy observations and XRD studies while the corresponding phase transition enthalpies were obtained by DSC. The ILC was doped with CNT in concentration of 0.05% w/w and 0.5% w/w. The dielectric spectra were recorded in the frequency range from 10−1 to 107 Hz. The dependence of the dielectric constant and electric energy loss on frequency and temperature was studied. The activation energy was determined and the characteristic time was obtained by fitting the spectra of the dielectric loss with the Havriliak–Negami function. The study of the dielectric spectra leads to the following observations: (1) The study of the dielectric permittivity and electric conductivity spectra is complex, due to the superposition of ionic conductivity effect and dipolar relaxation specific to LC. Ionic conductivity is dominant and its effects are indirectly seen through the electrode polarization (EP) effect. (2) The very high dielectric permittivity values and the decrease of the electric conductivity at low frequencies confirm the presence of EP. (3) The doping with CNTs results in an increase of the conductivity. (4) Relaxation times decrease with CNT concentration. (5) In the lower temperature range, the presence of CNTs leads to a decrease of the activation energy while for higher temperatures, the activation energies are very similar for the pure ILC and the doped samples. As expected, the activation energies are lower at higher temperatures.

These preliminary studies revealed an interesting influence of the CNT concentration on the dielectric behavior of the bisimidazolium salt. This investigation will be extended to new ionic liquid crystals with a large range of doping concentration in order to complete the existing image on these aspects. Special attention will be paid to low-frequency studies of the effects related to very low CNT concentration.


Characterization methods

All chemicals were used as supplied. C, H, N analyses were carried out with an EuroEA 3300 instrument. IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker spectrophotometer using KBr discs or by using a Jasco FTIR 4200 spectrophotometer coupled to an ATR PIKE GladiATR device. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker spectrometer operating at 500 MHz, using CDCl3 as solvent. 1H chemical shifts were referenced to the solvent peak position, δ = 7.26 ppm. The phase assignment for the bisimidazolium salt was evaluated by polarizing optical light microscopy (POM) [56,57], placed on untreated glass slides, using a Nikon 50iPol microscope equipped with a Linkam THMS600 hot stage and TMS94 control processor. Temperatures and enthalpies of transitions were recorded by using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) technique employing a Diamond DSC Perkin Elmer instrument. The bisimidazolium salt was studied at a scanning rate of 10 K/min after being encapsulated in an aluminum pan. Three heating–cooling cycles were performed for this sample.

Synthesis of [bisC8ImC10][C12OSO3]2

A solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate (2.18 g, 7.5 mmol) in methanol (60 mL) was added dropwise to a solution of compound 2 (2 g, 3.0 mmol) in dichloromethane (50 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h after which 100 mL of deionised water was added. The organic layer was separated and washed repeatedly with water until no reaction with silver nitrate for Br was noticed. The organic phase was dried over sodium sulfate followed by solvent removal with a rotary evaporator. The product was recrystallized twice from a mixture of dichloromethane and ethyl ether to yield an off-white waxy solid. Yield 75%, off-white waxy solid. Anal. calcd for C56H110N4O8S2: C, 65.20; H, 10.75; N, 5.43; found: C, 65.59; H, 11.03; N, 5.27; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.58 (s, 2H), 7.78 (s, 2H), 7.24 (s, 2H), 4.32–4.20 (m, 8H), 4.01 (t, 4H), 1.94-1.84 (t, 8H), 1.64 (t, 4H), 1.42–1.22 (m, 68H), 0.86 (t, 12H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 136.9, 123.3, 121.6, 67.8, 49.9, 49.4, 31.9; 29.7, 29.6, 29.5, 29.4, 22.7, 14.1; IR (ATR, cm−1): 3136, 3109, 2957, 2919, 2851, 1568, 1467, 1379, 1225, 1169, 1063, 1044, 1005, 932, 792, 723, 623, 580.

Preparation of the mixtures of LC doped with CNTs

Single-walled CNTs (Aldrich code 519308) with a diameter between 1.2 and 5 nm were employed in this study. Two CNT/[bisC8ImC10][C12H25OSO3]2 mixtures with different amounts of CNTs (0.5% w/w and 0.05% w/w) were prepared for dielectric measurements by consecutive dilution of an initial sample containing 2% CNTs. The starting sample was prepared by dissolving first the bisimidazolium salt (0.2 g) in a minimum volume of dichloromethane (1 mL) followed by addition of CNT (0.004 g) [58]. The resulting mixture was sonicated for at least 60 min followed by the removal of the solvent, drying in vacuum and cooling at 0 °C. All samples were kept at 0 °C before the physical measurements. Prior to dielectric measurements, the samples were heated to 50 °C and sonicated for at least 15 min to ensure an homogeneous dispersion of CNTs in the ionic liquid crystalline sample.

X-ray diffraction

The X-ray diffraction measurements were made on a D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker AXS GmbH, Germany), in parallel beam setting, with monochromatized Cu Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å), scintillation detector, and horizontal sample stage. The measurements were performed in symmetric (θ–θ) geometry in the 2θ range from 1.5 to 30° in steps of 0.02°, with measuring times per step in the range of 5–40 s. The sample was deposited on a Si(100) plate, heated to the isotropic state and then cooled down to room temperature prior to data acquisition

Dielectric spectroscopy

The dielectric spectroscopy measurements were performed using a broadband dielectric spectrometer, NOVOCONTROL, with an Alpha-A high-performance frequency analyzer in the LF domain (0.01 to 107 Hz), equipped with WinDETA software. The temperature was controlled within 0.2 K, at a constant ac voltage of 0.5 V.


Constantin Paul Ganea thanks the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research for financial support under PN16-480101 of CORE Program. Viorel Cîrcu acknowledges the funding from UEFISCDI, project number PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0384. Doina Manaila Maximean thanks Ligia Frunza and Stefan Frunza for useful discussions.


  1. Goossens, K.; Lava, K.; Bielawski, C. W.; Binnemans, K. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 4643–4807. doi:10.1021/cr400334b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Axenov, K. V.; Laschat, S. Materials 2011, 4, 206–259. doi:10.3390/ma4010206
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Cîrcu, V. Ionic Liquid Crystals Based on Pyridinium Salts. In Progress and Developments in Ionic Liquids; Handy, S., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2017; pp 285–311. doi:10.5772/65757
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Yang, M.; Stappert, K.; Mudring, A.-V. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 458–473. doi:10.1039/C3TC31368A
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  5. Robertson, L. A.; Schenkel, M. R.; Wiesenauer, B. R.; Gin, D. L. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 9407–9409. doi:10.1039/C3CC44452J
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  6. Noujeim, N.; Samsam, S.; Eberlin, L.; Sanon, S. H.; Rochefort, D.; Schmitzer, A. R. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 10914–10920. doi:10.1039/C2SM26213D
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Bara, J. E.; Hatakeyama, E. S.; Wiesenauer, B. R.; Zeng, X.; Noble, R. D.; Gin, D. L. Liq. Cryst. 2010, 37, 1587–1599. doi:10.1080/02678292.2010.521859
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  8. Kumar, S.; Gupta, S. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 5459–5462. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.08.022
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. D’Anna, F.; Noto, R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 20, 4201–4223. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201301871
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Pană, A.; Iliş, M.; Staicu, T.; Pasuk, I.; Cîrcu, V. Liq. Cryst. 2016, 43, 381–392. doi:10.1080/02678292.2015.1116630
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Anderson, J. L.; Ding, R. F.; Ellern, A.; Armstrong, D. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 593–604. doi:10.1021/ja046521u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Pană, A.; Iliş, M.; Micutz, M.; Dumitraşcu, F.; Pasuk, I.; Cîrcu, V. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 59491–59497. doi:10.1039/C4RA11023D
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Bhadani, A.; Misono, T.; Singh, S.; Sakai, K.; Sakai, H.; Abe, M. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 231, 36–58. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2016.03.005
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Pietralik, Z.; Kołodziejska, Ż.; Weiss, M.; Kozak, M. PLoS One 2015, 10, e0144373. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144373
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Zhou, T.; Llizo, A.; Li, P.; Wang, C.; Guo, Y.; Ao, M.; Bai, L.; Wang, C.; Yang, Y.; Xu, G. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 26573–26581. doi:10.1021/jp4061363
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Andrzejewska, W.; Wilkowska, M.; Chrabąszczewska, M.; Kozak, M. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 26006–26018. doi:10.1039/C6RA24978G
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Kamboj, R.; Singh, S.; Bhadani, A.; Kataria, H.; Kaur, G. Langmuir 2012, 28, 11969–11978. doi:10.1021/la300920p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Bhadani, A.; Singh, S. Langmuir 2011, 27, 14033–14044. doi:10.1021/la202201r
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Rodrigues, M.; Calpena, A. C.; Amabilino, D. B.; Garduño-Ramíreze, M. L.; Pérez-García, L. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 5419–5429. doi:10.1039/C4TB00450G
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Ilincă, T. A.; Pasuk, I.; Cîrcu, V. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 11113–11124. doi:10.1039/C7NJ02561K
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  21. Saielli, G.; Bagno, A.; Wang, Y. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 3829–3836. doi:10.1021/jp5104565
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Bruce, D. W.; Estdale, S.; Guillon, D.; Heinrich, B. Liq. Cryst. 1995, 19, 301–305. doi:10.1080/02678299508031983
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Cruz, C.; Heinrich, B.; Ribeiro, A. C.; Bruce, D. W.; Guillon, D. Liq. Cryst. 2000, 27, 1625–1631. doi:10.1080/026782900750037185
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Lava, K.; Evrard, Y.; Van Hecke, K.; Van Meervelt, L.; Binnemans, K. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 8061–8070. doi:10.1039/C2RA21208K
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Cardinaels, T.; Lava, K.; Goossens, K.; Eliseeva, S. V.; Binnemans, K. Langmuir 2011, 27, 2036–2043. doi:10.1021/la1047276
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Haristoy, D.; Tsiourvas, D. Liq. Cryst. 2004, 31, 697–703. doi:10.1080/02678290410001675110
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Mihelj, T.; Popović, J.; Skoko, Ž.; Tomašić, V. Thermochim. Acta 2014, 591, 119–129. doi:10.1016/j.tca.2014.07.024
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Nikokavoura, A.; Tsiourvas, D.; Arkas, M.; Sideratou, Z.; Paleos, C. M. Liq. Cryst. 2002, 29, 1547–1553. doi:10.1080/0267829021000034808
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Rettenmeier, E.; Tokarev, A.; Blanc, C.; Dieudonné, P.; Guari, Y.; Hesemann, P. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 356, 639–646. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.055
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Wang, Y.; Marques, E. F. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 1151–1157. doi:10.1021/jp0552729
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Wang, Y.; Marques, E. F. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2010, 100, 501–508. doi:10.1007/s10973-009-0653-8
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Westphal, E.; Henrique da Silva, D.; Molin, F.; Gallardo, H. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 6442–6454. doi:10.1039/C3RA23456H
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  33. Lagerwall, J. P. F.; Scalia, G. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 2890–2898. doi:10.1039/b802707b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Rahman, M.; Lee, W. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2009, 42, 063001. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/42/6/063001
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Dolgov, L.; Kovalchuk, O.; Lebovka, N.; Tomylko, S.; Yaroshchuk, O. Liquid crystal dispersions of carbon nanotubes: dielectric, electro-optical and structural peculiarities. In Carbon Nanotubes; Marulanda, J. M., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2010; pp 451–484. doi:10.5772/39439
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Dierking, I.; Scalia, G.; Morales, P.; LeClere, D. Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, 865–869. doi:10.1002/adma.200306196
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Rosu, C.; Manaila-Maximean, D.; Donescu, D.; Frunza, S.; Sterian, A. R. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2010, 24, 65–73. doi:10.1142/S0217984910022238
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Ganea, C. P.; Manaila-Maximean, D. UPB Sci. Bull., Ser. A 2011, 73, 209–216.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  39. Blinov, L. M.; Chigrinov, V. G. Electrooptic Effects in Liquid Crystal Material; Springer: New York, NY, U.S.A., 1996. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2692-5
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Koval'chuk, A. V.; Dolgov, L.; Yaroshchuk, O. Semicond. Phys., Quantum Electron. Optoelectron. 2008, 11, 337–341.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Chen, H.-Y.; Lee, W. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 222105. doi:10.1063/1.2208373
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Lee, W.; Chen, H.-Y.; Shih, Y.-C. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2008, 16, 733–741.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  43. García-García, A.; Vergaz, R.; Algorri, J. F.; Quintana, X.; Otón, J. M. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 396–403. doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.39
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  44. Tomylko, S.; Yaroshchuk, O.; Koval'chuk, O.; Lebovka, N. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 16456–16463. doi:10.1039/C7CP01722G
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  45. Lee, J. J.; Yamaguchi, A.; Alam, Md. A.; Yamamoto, Y.; Fukushima, T.; Kato, K.; Takata, M.; Fujita, N.; Aida, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8490–8494. doi:10.1002/anie.201203284
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Hunt, P. A.; Ashworth, C. R.; Matthews, R. P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 1257–1288. doi:10.1039/C4CS00278D
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  47. Dong, K.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 6744–6764. doi:10.1039/C5CC10120D
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Men, S.; Mitchell, D. S.; Lovelock, K. R. J.; Licence, P. ChemPhysChem 2015, 16, 2211–2218. doi:10.1002/cphc.201500227
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  49. Wulf, A.; Fumino, K.; Michalik, D.; Ludwig, R. ChemPhysChem 2007, 8, 2265–2269. doi:10.1002/cphc.200700508
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  50. He, H.; Chen, H.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yu, Z. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 121, 169–179. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2014.07.024
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  51. Headley, A. D.; Jackson, N. M. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2002, 15, 52–55. doi:10.1002/poc.449
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  52. Kremer, F.; Schönhals, A., Eds. Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy; Springer-Verlag: Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany, 2003. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-56120-7
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  53. Dyre, J. C.; Maass, P.; Roling, B.; Sidebottom, D. L. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2009, 72, 046501. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/72/4/046501
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  54. Jacobs, J. D.; Koerner, H.; Heinz, H.; Farmer, B. L.; Mirau, P.; Garrett, P. H.; Vaia, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 20143–20157. doi:10.1021/jp061931l
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  55. Klein, R. J.; Zhang, S.; Dou, S.; Jones, B. H.; Colby, R. H.; Runta, J. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 144903. doi:10.1063/1.2186638
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  56. Kumar, J.; Manjuladevi, V.; Gupta, R. K.; Kumar, S. Liq. Cryst. 2016, 43, 488–496. doi:10.1080/02678292.2015.1119320
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  57. García-García, A.; Vergaz, R.; Algorri, J. F.; Zito, G.; Cacace, T.; Marino, A.; Otón, J. M.; Geday, M. A. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7, 825–833. doi:10.3762/bjnano.7.74
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  58. Jagadish, K.; Srikantaswamy, S.; Byrappa, K.; Shruthi, L.; Abhilash, M. R. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, No. 381275. doi:10.1155/2015/381275
    Return to citation in text: [1]

Article is part of the issue

Alexei R. Khokhlov and Alexander Emelyanenko

Interesting articles

Yuri P. Panarin , Sithara P. Sreenilayam , Jagdish K. Vij , Anne Lehmann and Carsten Tschierske

Amanda García-García , Ricardo Vergaz , José F. Algorri , Xabier Quintana and José M. Otón

Eva-Maria Steyskal , Christopher Wiednig , Norbert Enzinger and Roland Würschum

© 2018 Maximean et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjnano)

Back to Article List