3 article(s) from Kumar T. P., Ragesh
- Full Research Paper
- Published 14 Feb 2018
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Structural arrangement of HFeCo3(CO)12 and H2FeRu3(CO)13 illustrating differences in symmetry and l...
-
![]()
Figure 2: Isotope distribution of a) HFeCo3(CO)12 and b) H2FeRu3(CO)13. Isotope distribution for both compoun...
-
![]()
Figure 3: Negative ion yield curves for the formation of a) [Fe(CO)n]− and b) [Ru(CO)n]− up on electron attac...
-
![]()
Figure 4: Loss of Fe(CO)2 (panel a), Fe(CO)3 (panel b), Fe(CO)4 (panel c) and additional loss of up to 7 COs ...
-
![]()
Figure 5: Negative ions formed through loss of Ru(CO)3 (panel a), Ru(CO)4 (panel b) and further loss of up to...
-
![]()
Figure 6: Calculated spin density of the [H2FeRu3(CO)13]− anion; a) in the constrained geometry of neutral H2...
-
![]()
Figure 7: Calculated MO diagrams of H2FeRu3(CO)13 and HFeCo3(CO)12. Red lines represent the unoccupied molecu...
-
![]()
Figure 8: Electron impact ionization spectra of H2FeRu3(CO)13 recorded at electron energy of 70 eV, upper pan...
-
![]()
Figure 9: Evolution of O 1s, Fe 2p and Ru 3d/C 1s XPS regions of a H2FeRu3(CO)13 film exposed to electron dos...
-
![]()
Figure 10: Change in fractional coverage of oxygen atoms (red stars) and, Ru 3d5/2 peak position (blue open ci...
-
![]()
Figure 11: Mass spectrum of neutral gas phase species desorbed from an H2FeRu3(CO)13 film during the course of...
-
![]()
Figure 12: Changes in O 1s, Fe 2p and Ru 3d/C 1s XPS regions when an H2FeRu3(CO)13 film was exposed to electro...
-
![]()
Figure 13: Initial decomposition/deposition of surface adsorbed H2FeRu3(CO)13 precursor, mediated by dissociat...
-
![]()
Figure 14: Schematic showing the incorporation of partially decarbonylated intermediate of H2FeRu3(CO)13 into ...
-
![]()
Figure 15: (a) AFM cross sections of deposits shown in the SEM micrograph (b) at the positions indicated by th...
-
![]()
Figure 16: Transport measurements of as-grown Fe–Ru deposit and deposits grown under identical conditions afte...
-
-
Supp. Info
- Full Research Paper
- Published 10 Nov 2017
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Molecular structure of (a) 1,1-dichloro-1-silacyclohexane (cyclo-C5H10SiCl2) and (b) silacyclohexan...
-
![]()
Figure 2: Negative ion yield curve for the principal fragments formed by the electron attachment dissociation...
-
![]()
Figure 3: Positive ion mass spectra of (a) DCSCH and (b) SCH, both spectra are recorded at an electron impact...
-
![]()
Figure 4: Pillars grown by EBID from the precursors DCSCH (left) and SCH (right). The precursor pressure was ...
-
![]()
Figure 5: Measured (a) pillar base diameter, (b) pillar height and (c) heights of the cone-shaped upper part ...
-
![]()
Figure 6: (a) Pillar volume determined from the measured pillar diameter, pillar height, tip cone height and ...
-
![]()
Figure 7: a) Schematic showing the order of pillar deposition in a circular array around a central dot; b) sc...
-
![]()
Figure 8: Tilted (45°) and normal view of two sets of nine closely spaced pillars deposited in a circular arr...
-
![]()
Figure 9: Square arrays of pillars deposited with the indicated beam exposure time and neighbouring pillar di...
-
![]()
Figure 10: Monte Carlo simulation of the angular distribution of electrons emitted from a flat Si substrate wi...
-
- Review
- Published 16 Sep 2015
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Schematic representation of the FEBID process (reproduced with permission from [2], Copyright (2008) A...
-
![]()
Figure 2: Schematic representation of elastic and inelastic scattering of high-energy primary electrons impin...
-
![]()
Figure 3: Experimentally measured SE spectra from Ni(111) [6] irradiated by PEs with 400 eV impact energy (black...
-
![]()
Figure 4: Simplified two-dimensional potential energy diagram for quasi-diatomic dissociation through electro...
-
![]()
Figure 5: Simplified two-dimensional potential energy diagram for a quasi-diatomic dissociation through elect...
-
![]()
Figure 6: Simplified two-dimensional potential energy diagram for a quasi-diatomic dissociation through elect...
-
![]()
Figure 7: Energy-dependent relative cross sections (ion yields) of negative ion fragments produced by DEA to ...
-
![]()
Figure 8: Positive ion mass spectrum of MeCpPtMe3 recorded with electron energy of 100 eV (reproduced with pe...
-
![]()
Figure 9: Positive ion mass spectra of MeCpPtMe3 in the m/z range of 0–85 (reproduced with permission from Wn...
-
![]()
Figure 10: Changes in the C/Pt ratio of a 3.16 nm thick film of MeCpPtMe3 adsorbed on a gold surface at 180 K ...
-
![]()
Figure 11: a) A line of best fit to the cross section for methane desorption from MeCpPtMe3 adsorbed on a gold...
-
![]()
Figure 12: Energy-dependent absolute cross sections for negative ion fragments produced by DEA to Pt(PF3)4 (re...
-
![]()
Figure 13: Electron ionization FT-ICR mass spectrum of Pt(PF3)4 recorded at 20 eV incident electron energy (re...
-
![]()
Figure 14: (a) Electron energy loss spectra of Pt(PF3)4 recorded at 0° angle with varying residual energies. T...
-
![]()
Figure 15: Time-resolved mass spectra of gas phase PF3 (positive [PF2]+ ions produced by 70 eV electron impact...
-
![]()
Figure 16: Electron dose dependence of the fractional coverage of Phosphorous (P/PD=0), Fluorine (F/FD=0) and ...
-
![]()
Figure 17: Energy-dependent absolute DEA cross sections for Co(CO)3NO (reproduced with permission from [10], Copyr...
-
![]()
Figure 18: Energy dependence of the partial cross sections for positive ion fragments formed from Co(CO)3NO (r...
-
![]()
Figure 19: The partial cross sections for single CO loss through DEA (red solid line), for single CO loss thro...
-
![]()
Figure 20: Predicted relative effective damage yield for single CO loss through DEA (red solid line), for sing...
-
![]()
Figure 21: Positive ion (DI) mass spectra of (a) gas phase Co(CO)3NO, (b) volatile species desorbing from a 2....
-
![]()
Figure 22: Electron dose dependence of the fractional coverage of carbon, oxygen and nitrogen from Co(CO)3NO a...
-
