Beilstein J. Nanotechnol.2013,4, 198–207, doi:10.3762/bjnano.4.20
the amplitude-modulation (AM) scheme while the second eigenmode was driven with a much smaller amplitude in openloop (OL, that is, only the first mode amplitude signal was used to control the tip–sample distance feedback loop. The second eigenmode drive signal had a constant amplitude and frequency
, namely AM-OL, AM-FM (CE), and AM-FM (CA), which differ in the type of control scheme used to drive the higher eigenmode (openloop, constant-excitation frequency-modulation, and constant-amplitude frequency-modulation, respectively). The corresponding higher eigenmode channels exhibit clear differences
PDF
Figure 1:
Schematic setup of our AFM operated in AM-OL or AM-FM mode. AM-OL mode can be accomplished by addin...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol.2012,3, 336–344, doi:10.3762/bjnano.3.38
of the cantilever with the amplitude and the frequency feedback loops enabled. Notice that the shape of the perturbation is a step function for both cases. However, for the open-loop case the perturbation is a sudden change in the amplitude of the driving force, whereas for the closed-loop
configuration the perturbation is a sudden change in the amplitude setpoint. As shown in the charts, the response time in the second configuration is dramatically reduced with respect to the open-loop configuration.
The second consideration, closely related to the previous one, is the energy balance. Assuming a
step perturbation under high Q. (a) Perturbation applied to the free cantilever. (b) Amplitude response for a free cantilever in the open-loop configuration. (c) Amplitude response for a free cantilever in the close-loop configuration. The inset shows a zoom in the step region, showing a characteristic
PDF
Figure 1:
The interaction versus distance. (a) Conservative force versus distance interaction between an AFM ...