4Present address: Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology (IFM), Linköping University, SE-58183, Linköping, Sweden
5Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, v.v.i. AS CR, Flemingovo náměstí 2, Prague 6, CZ-16610, Czech Republic
6Department of Physical Chemistry, University of Olomouc, tř. 17. listopadu 12, CZ-77146 Olomouc, Czech Republic
7Laboratoire de Chimie des Matériaux Nouveaux, Université de Mons, Place du Parc 20, B-7000 Mons, Belgium
Associate Editor: S. Bräse
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 1047–1063. doi:10.3762/bjoc.10.105
Received 04 Dec 2013, Accepted 04 Apr 2014, Published 08 May 2014
Methods were developed and optimized for the preparation of the 2,3-cis- and the 10,11-cis-isomers of silybin by the Lewis acid catalyzed (BF3∙OEt2) isomerization of silybins A (1a) and B (1b) (trans-isomers). The absolute configuration of all optically pure compounds was determined by using NMR and comparing their electronic circular dichroism data with model compounds of known absolute configurations. Mechanisms for cis–trans-isomerization of silybin are proposed and supported by quantum mechanical calculations.
Keywords: 2,3-cis-silybin; 10,11-cis-silybin; isomerization; silibinin; silybin; silymarin
The flavonolignan silybin (alternative name silibinin), occurring in the fruits of Silybum marianum (milk thistle), consists of two stereoisomers – silybin A (1a) and B (1b) – in a ca. 1:1 ratio (Figure 1). Their absolute configuration is known [1,2] and their separation was accomplished recently [3-5]. Both silybin isomers as well as other flavonolignans from silymarin (crude defatted extract from the fruits of S. marianum) are products of a phenolic oxidative coupling of the flavonoid taxifolin and the lignan coniferyl alcohol. The mechanism of this coupling reaction was described  and implied a 10,11-trans relative configuration, as in all the major components of silymarin. Little is known about the structures of the minor components of silymarin. It was speculated that some of them were 10,11-cis-analogues of the major silymarin constituents , but these minor components were never isolated in sufficient amount and purity to enable such unwarranted hypotheses to be verified [8,9]. Another study focusing on the minor components of silymarin identified two new compounds isosilybin C (3) and D (4), however these were shown to be regioisomers of isosilybins A (5) and B (6)  (Figure 2).
Other authors reported 2,3-cis-isomers of silybin [11,12], the relative configuration of which were corroborated by 1H NMR coupling constants, i.e., J2,3 of ca. 11 Hz in the trans-isomers and 2–3 Hz in the cis-isomers. Nevertheless, their absolute configurations remained unknown. The origin of the cis-isomers either as biosynthetic side products or as artifacts formed during their isolation is also unknown.
The isolation of naturally occurring cis-isomers in the pure form and their complete structure identification would be the only unambiguous way how to prove identity of natural and synthetic cis-isomers. Unfortunately, the conventional identification by LC–MS or UV–vis scanning is inadequate as the major and minor compounds exhibit the same MS and UV profiles.
The content of silybin cis-isomers in silymarin is presumably very low. The composition of silymarin strongly depends upon its source, which is influenced by the variety of S. marianum and by the cultivation, harvest and processing conditions. Variations of the minority content (not only silybin cis-isomers) is even more pronounced. Therefore, their identification in a particular silymarin preparation would have only limited information value.
Silybin is an important pharmaceutical commodity and a complete understanding of its composition is needed in order to understand its pharmaceutical properties. Therefore, the detailed structural knowledge and availability of (potential) minor impurities is a fundamental requisite, e.g., for master file assembly.
The aim of this work was to prepare stereochemically pure 2,3-cis- and 10,11-cis-isomers of silybin A (1a) and B (1b) by a Lewis acid catalyzed isomerization to determine their absolute configuration and to propose a mechanism for the cis–trans-isomerization processes.
In our previous work on the enzymatic kinetic resolution of silybin [4,5], BF3∙OEt2 in EtOAc was found to catalyze the transesterification of silybin to yield not only 23-O-acetylsilybin (2, ca. 90%), but two novel compounds with UV spectra similar to that of silybin. Enzymatic alcoholysis (n-butanol) of this mixture by Novozym 435 led, after a prolonged reaction time, to the removal of the acetyl groups from trans-isomers 2a and 2b to give 1a and 1b (Figure 1), while the two minor isomers remained acetylated. Separation of the resulting mixture by silica gel column chromatography yielded an inseparable mixture of the two new compounds. In HPLC they were assigned to two separate peaks with the same molecular mass (m/z 524). 1H NMR spectra indicated that the two compounds differ only slightly from the silybin derivatives 2a and 2b, respectively. The unknown compounds exhibit a J10,11 of ca. 3 Hz, whereas natural silybin (1) has a J10,11 of ca. 8 Hz. Based on this evidence, the unknown compounds from the acylation reaction were proposed to be a diastereoisomeric mixture of 23-O-acetyl-10,11-cis-silybin A (7) and B (8) (Figure 3) in a ca. 1:1 ratio.
As the yields of the two 10,11-cis-silybin isomers were low (ca. 10%), we optimized the reaction conditions for better yields. In the initial screening, aimed at finding the most suitable solvent and Lewis acid (Table 1), we used natural silybin, i.e., ca. 1:1 mixture of 1a and 1b.
Table 1: Screening of suitable Lewis and protic acids for silybin isomerization.
|Lewis acid||conversion (%)a||note|
|TiCl4||–||strong complexation, quantitative oxidation to 2,3-dehydrosilybin|
|FeCl3||no reaction||strong complexation|
|toluene-4-sulfonic acid||no reaction|
aReaction conditions: silybin, Lewis or protic acid (>10 equiv), DMF, 50 °C, 1–3 h.
The choice of solvent was limited by the low solubility of silybin in most organic solvents or by their incompatibility with the Lewis acid BF3·OEt2. The following solvents were tested: EtOAc, DMF, CH3CN, DMSO, CHCl3 at 0, 25, and 50 °C. In CH3CN and DMSO silybin decomposed, and in CHCl3 the reaction failed. In EtOAc, the reaction was accompanied by C-23 O-acetylation, which complicated the reaction mixture analysis. DMF at 50 °C was found to be the most suitable solvent for the isomerization and was used for further Lewis acid screening. Eventually, BF3·OEt2 proved to be the most suitable Lewis acid for silybin isomerization (Table 1). Other Lewis acids either gave lower isomerization yields (SnCl4), did not work at all, or even caused decomposition. Toluene-4-sulfonic acid, as a representative protic acid, gave no reaction under the same conditions.
In this work, the preparative reactions with the two solvents DMF and EtOAc and with stereochemically pure silybin A (1a) and B (1b) (Figure 1) exhibited a strong dependence on the solvent. In DMF (BF3·OEt2, 50 °C), the reaction led to a single type of C-2, C-3-isomerization yielding the corresponding 2,3-cis-10,11-trans-silybin A (9) and 2,3-cis-10,11-trans-silybin B (10) (Scheme 1), respectively. No C-10, C-11-isomerization was observed in this case. In EtOAc, various cis-isomers were obtained, depending on the reaction time and also on the type of starting material (1a or 1b). A detailed analysis of silybin B (1b) isomerization in EtOAc showed the formation of the 23-O-acetyl-2,3-cis-10,11-trans-isomer 11 within the first 3 hours, then it slowly disappeared, and finally 23-O-acetyl-2,3-trans-10,11-cis-silybin B (12) was formed (Scheme 2). In EtOAc (48 h, 80 °C), 1a isomerized into the 23-O-acetyl-2,3-cis-10,11-trans-isomer 12 and a minor 23-O-acetyl-2,3-trans-10,11-cis-isomer 13 (Scheme 3). Surprisingly, the absolute configuration at C-2, C-3 of compound 13 was the opposite of 1a (2S,3S vs 2R,3R), which was confirmed by a comparison of their electronic circular dichroism (ECD) data. Formation of the 10,11-cis-isomer with the 2R,3R configuration was not observed during/after the isomerization of 1a in EtOAc. All the reactions in EtOAc were accompanied by C-23 O-acetylation.
The separation of 2,3-cis-silybin 7 from unreacted 2,3-trans-silybin 1a (or 10 from 1b) on silica gel was not feasible, analogous to the preparative separation of silybin stereoisomers 1a and 1b (Figure 1), which was a challenge for several decades. It was accomplished as the separation of the respective silybin glycosides for the first time [13,14], later by HPLC , and at the preparatory scale by lipase-catalyzed discrimination [4,5]. However, chromatographic separation of 2,3-cis- and 2,3-trans-silybins is feasible after their C-23 O-acetylation, which can be accomplished with Novozym 435 in an acetone/vinyl acetate mixture, giving a nearly quantitative yield of the respective acetates (without the risk of further isomerization) (Scheme 4, part I). As the 2,3-trans-isomer was more abundant than the 2,3-cis-isomer its excess was removed before enzymatic acetylation by crystallizing the crude mixture from MeOH/H2O 9:1, which increased the ratio of the cis/trans-isomer in the mixture from 1:4 to 1:2.
All pure cis-silybins were obtained as their C-23 acetates. The deacetylation proved to be rather difficult, as both acidic and basic hydrolysis as well as mild transesterification (NaOMe, MeOH) failed and/or resulted in decomposition or reversed isomerization to the original trans-isomers. We eventually had to use enzymatic alcoholysis with a large excess of Novozym 435 and a longer reaction time (5:1, wt. enzyme/substrate, 3–5 d, 45 °C) compared to the alcoholysis of the respective acetates of the trans-silybins. This method finally yielded pure 2,3-cis-silybins A (9) and B (10) as well as 10,11-cis-silybin B (14) (Scheme 4, parts II and III).
The determination of the absolute configuration of the new cis-silybins by X-ray analysis is not possible, since all attempts to obtain suitable crystals using various crystallization conditions were unsuccessful. Pure silybins and their congeners are known for their poor crystallization or the formation of small crystals, which are not suitable for X-ray analysis. The absolute configuration of silybins A (1a) and B (1b) was determined indirectly on the basis of a comparison of their physicochemical data (NMR, ECD, OR). Later, these data were matched to those of their 10,11-regioisomer, isosilybin A (5) . The same approach was used to determine the absolute configuration of isosilybin B (6). The only analogue that yielded suitable crystals, and hence an unequivocal determination of its absolute configuration, was 7-(4-bromobenzoyl)isosilybin A .
In this study the determination of the absolute configuration was based on NMR and ECD spectroscopy. Their relative configurations, i.e., the determination of trans/cis isomers at C-2, C-3 and C-10, C-11, are set by the 1H NMR coupling constants J2,3 and J10,11, respectively. The trans-isomers exhibit J2,3 of ca. 11 Hz and J10,11 of ca. 8 Hz, while the cis-configuration is indicated by a value of J2,3 or J10,11 of ca. 2–3 Hz [11,12].
For the assignment of the absolute configuration, experimental ECD spectra of compounds 9, 10, 13, and 14 were compared to those of related compounds with known absolute configurations . The assignment of Cotton effects (CE) to particular regions in this molecule is based on the rough assumption that silybin and its analogues are considered to be composed of two separate π-conjugated subsystems, the 3-hydroxyflavonone moiety (with the stereogenic centers C-2 and C-3), and the 1,4-benzodioxane moiety (C-10 and C-11) (see Figure 4). In this simplification we cannot avoid the adverse effects caused by neglecting the effects of local perturbations on specific stereogenic centers. Thus, the interpretation of our experimental ECD spectra is mainly based on empirical comparison and correlation to those of i) the dihydroflavonols taxifolin (15) and epitaxifolin (16) isolated from Thujopsis dolobrata  and ii) various benzodioxanes, e.g., the pair of benzodioxanes 17 and 18 synthesized from (+)-ephedrine; the natural benzodioxanes eusiderin (19) and eusiderin C (20) ; 21 and 22, isolated from Juniperus chinensis ; and benzodioxane 23 from Licaria chrysophylla  (Figure 5), for both the C-2, C-3 and C-10, C-11 pairs, respectively .
The ECD of the 3-hydroxyflavonone moiety was discussed with the aim to determine absolute configuration . UV absorption bands in the respective 270–290 nm and 330–320 nm ranges were utilized, which were clearly rationalized in terms of the corresponding electronic transitions [22,23]. A pair of positive–negative CEs at both spectral ranges is characteristic of the (2R,3R) configuration of the 3-hydroxyflavonone moiety. Nevertheless, it should be kept in mind that there are also other absorption bands at shorter wavelengths giving rise to observable CEs near 230 nm, which are relatively constant in pattern [24-28].
The ECD spectrum of compound 10: (θ [deg·cm2·dmol−1], CEs: 339 nm, θ = +24971; 294 nm, θ = −50028; 237 nm θ = +16914; 224 nm, θ = −8082; 213 nm, θ = −44628; 203 nm, θ = +162457; 193 nm, θ = −71457) (Figure S1, Supporting Information File 1) displayed the coupling constant J2,3 = 2.5 Hz corresponding to a cis-configuration and, therefore, compound 10 was assigned to the 2R,3S-isomer. The ECD spectrum of compound 9: (θ [deg·cm2·dmol−1], CEs: 338 nm, θ = +26771; 292 nm, θ = −60650; 233 nm, θ = −58000; 214 nm, θ = −9828; 207 nm, θ = +83000; 197 nm, θ = +77685) (Figure S2, Supporting Information File 1) together with the J2,3 coupling constant of 2.4 Hz (cis-configuration) are similar to (+)-epitaxifolin . Therefore, the absolute configuration of 9 at C-2, C-3 is 2R,3S. The absolute configuration of compound 14 at C-2, C-3 is analogous to (+)-taxifolin (2R,3R), according to its J2,3 value of 11.4 Hz and its ECD spectrum (14: θ [deg·cm2·dmol−1], CEs: 327 nm, θ = +9568; 293 nm, θ = −46824; 240 nm, Δε = +36917 deg·cm2·dmol−1; 230 nm, θ = −8890; 211 nm, θ = −63590) (Figure S3, Supporting Information File 1). Accordingly, its absolute configuration at C-2, C-3 should be 2R,3R. Interestingly, compound 13 seems to be 2,3-trans-10,11-cis-silybin according to its NMR spectra (J2,3 = 11.3 Hz, J10,11 = 2.9 Hz). However, its ECD spectrum (13: θ [deg·cm2·dmol−1], CEs: 328 nm, θ = −12870; 294 nm, θ = +44453; 253 nm, θ = −7535; 242 nm, θ = +7451; 229 nm, θ = −71888; 205 nm, θ = −1116600; 194 nm, θ = +62990) (Figure S4, Supporting Information File 1) corresponds to (−)-taxifolin. According to these results, the absolute configuration at C-2, C-3 is the opposite of the starting compound 1a (2R,3R). Therefore, the absolute configuration of 13 is 2S,3S.
To assign the absolute configuration at C-10 and C-11 of silybin we combined the corresponding coupling constants J10,11 with the CEs in 200–280 nm spectral range. It was shown that a sign of the CE at ca. 236 nm could be used to determine the stereochemistry at C-3 (i.e. C-10 of silybin) (negative CE corresponds to the R configuration) [2,17,20]. Thus, the negative CE around 230 nm for 13, corroborated by the vicinal 1H–1H coupling constants (J10,11 = 2.9 Hz, e.g., cis-configuration) (Figure S4, Supporting Information File 1) indicates an absolute configuration of 2S,3S,10R,11S. In contrast to the ECD spectrum of silybin B (1b) (Figure S3, Supporting Information File 1), the J10,11 coupling constant (2.8 Hz, cis-configuration) of compound 14 and its ECD spectrum (positive/negative CE around 240 nm) implies the absolute configuration at C-10, C-11 to be 10S,11R, so that the absolute configuration of 14 is 2R,3R,10S,11R.
The absolute configuration at C-10, C-11 of the 2,3-cis-10,11-trans-silybins 9 and 10, as inferred from the coupling constants (J10,11 ca 8 Hz, trans-configuration) and the ECD spectra (Figure S1 and Figure S2, Supporting Information File 1), is 2R,3S,10R,11R (9) and 2R,3S,10S,11S (10). Here we would like to stress that the absolute configuration at C-10, C-11 of 9 and 10 remains the same as in the starting compounds, namely 1a (10R,11R) and 1b (10S,11S), respectively.
Based on the absolute configuration of the new cis-silybin isomers, we propose mechanisms for the stereospecific isomerization.
The isomerization process is initiated by BF3 complexation. Boron trifluoride may complex silybin through a coordinate bond, in which the two electrons originate from the oxygen atoms of silybin. Silybin and BF3 are hard bases (η = 4.8 eV in EtOAc) and acids (η = 7.3 eV in EtOAc), respectively (Table 2), favoring such a coordinate bond. The hardness of BF3 and silybin A is not significantly modified when the solvent polarity is increased (Table 2). The hardness of silybin B was not calculated, as the stereochemistry is not expected to significantly modify this parameter. The hardness calculation is based on the HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital) and LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital) energies, which are the same for silybin A and B. The quantum calculations show that the coordination complex at C-4=O (IIa in Scheme 5) is the most stable (Table 3). The corresponding complex IIa exhibits a strong O–B bond of 1.55 Å, lower than, e.g., 1.73 Å in the complex at O-1 (Table 4). In the benzopyranone moiety, IIa is more stable than the complex at O-1 by ca. 6 kcal·mol−1. In the benzodioxane moiety, complexation at O-12 is favored (compared to O-9) by 4 kcal·mol−1. The coordination with boron initiates isomerization at C-2, C-3 and C-10, C-11 by charge rearrangements (e.g., proton release and formation of IIb in Scheme 5). The mechanisms related to both sites can be considered separately, as both moieties are electronically independent.
Table 2: Chemical hardness (η, eV) of BF3 and silybin A (1a), in three different solvents (obtained at the IEFPCM B3P86/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory).
Table 3: Electronic energies (ΔE, kcal·mol−1) of BF3 complexation with silybin A (1a) at the different O-atoms.
Table 4: Bond distance and atomic charge of interest in BF3-silybin A at C-4=O (complex IIa) and O-1, in a) EtOAc and b) DMF.
|a)||complex at O-1||complex at C-4=O (IIa)|
|atomic charge at C3||0.023||0.030|
|b)||complex at O-1||complex at C-4=O (IIa)|
|atomic charge at C3||0.035||0.010|
The isomerization of flavanonols at C-2, C-3 is not without precedent, as it was described for taxillusin – the flavanonol glycoside from Taxillus kaempferi (Japanese mistletoe) containing the 3-hydroxy-2,3-dihydro-2-phenylchromen-4-one moiety . Taxillusin (24, (2R,3R)-taxifolin 3-β-D-glucopyranoside 6''-gallate, Figure 6) was subjected to both, basic and acidic hydrolysis during its structure elucidation. However, under these conditions four stereoisomers of the original aglycon (2R,3R)-taxifolin were formed. Base-catalyzed isomerization of another taxifolin glycoside, (2R,3R)-2,3-dihydroquercetin-3-α-L-rhamnopyranoside (pyridine; aqueous solution), was reported earlier [30-33]. The thermal or enzymatic rearrangement of taxifolin to alphitonin yielded four taxifolin isomers . With flavanonols (3-O-glycosides or the respective aglycons), isomerization can be explained by the benzopyranone ring enolization, which can be initiated by either acids or bases. A resonance effect can further cause reversible C-ring opening, thus allowing isomerization at C-2.
The proposed mechanism for the isomerization of silybin at C-2, C-3 was inspired by these previous studies, i.e., involving an enolization stage (route II in Scheme 5) [29-34]. In EtOAc, the isomerization can occur from 1a or from its acetylated counterpart (2a), since the 23-O-acetylation proceeds in parallel with the isomerization and is substantially faster than the isomerization reaction.
In principle, the isomerization can be initiated by the formation of coordination complexes at either C-4=O or O-1 (see Scheme 5). Nevertheless, based on the quantum chemical calculations (Table 3 and Table 4) together with the representation of cis-isomers in the isomerization mixture, the most stable coordination complex IIa at C-4=O is stabilized by a strong O–B bond of 1.55 Å, having an atomic charge at C-3 close to zero (Table 4). This favors a proton release from this position and the formation of the negatively charged species IIb. The release of BF3 probably occurs from IIb by two different routes. The major pathway (route I) proceeds without ring opening and after re-protonation it leads to the major cis-isomer 12. The minor route (route II), accompanied by a ring opening of the benzopyranone, proceeds via intermediate IIc, which after ring closure and protonation yielded a mixture of 2a and 13. This reversible benzopyranone ring opening/closure process is probably responsible for the inversion of the absolute configuration at C-2, C-3 of 13 compared to 2a (Scheme 5).
The limited degree of isomerization at C-2 of silybin requiring the ring opening of the benzopyranone is in agreement with a related study of taxifolin isomerization . A deuterium incorporation NMR study supported by quantum chemical calculations showed that the intermediate of taxifolin with an open benzopyranone ring (α-hydroxychalcone related to IIc in our study) is very short-lived and the energy barrier for its formation is relatively high . It must be noted that IIc contains additional substitution at the ortho-dihydroxyphenol moiety, which probably further decreases the possibilities for resonance stabilization compared to unsubstituted α-hydroxychalcone (quinone methide formation is disabled).
Interestingly, the course of 1a and 1b isomerization was slightly different in DMF than in EtOAc, since it only yielded the cis-isomers 9 and 10. The isomer with an inverted absolute configuration at C-2, C-3 (the non-acetylated form of 13) was not observed at all. This is easily explained by the charge distribution of complex IIa. In DMF, the atomic charge at C-3 is closer to zero than in EtOAc (Table 4). This clearly indicates that the formation of the open intermediates (IIc) is not supported in DMF.
The isomerization of 1 at the benzodioxane moiety is also initiated by BF3 complexation, followed by a multistep mechanism including the ring opening of benzodioxane. As the change in configuration takes place exclusively at C-11, it is probably initiated by the acid-catalyzed dioxane ring opening at O-12 (Scheme 6). This site is highly nucleophilic in EtOAc (Figure 7a), with lone electron pairs, which is in favor of BF3 complexation as confirmed by the complexation energies (Table 3). Following complexation, the D-ring opening proceeds (Scheme 6), allowing molecular rearrangements and isomerization after ring closure.
The observation of the isomerization of 1 (or 2) at C-11 that occurs in EtOAc but not in DMF can be explained either by a solvent effect or by the participation of the acetyl group. However, the second possibility is less probable, since the participation of the acetyl group should lead to the formation of an isomer with a retained configuration at C-11 (two subsequent nucleophilic substitutions with two Walden inversions). The possibility of acetyl group participation was refuted by the reaction of 2 in DMF, so that no isomerization took place at C-11. Moreover, in DMF the f(r) Fukui function is totally displaced into the E-ring (Figure 7b), so that the O-12 atom loses its nucleophilic character, which partially rationalizes the solvent effect observed here.
We report here the first syntheses of hitherto undescribed cis-isomers of silybin in optically pure form starting from silybin A (1a) and B (1b). The determination of their absolute configuration was based on an analysis of NMR coupling constants and a comparison of their ECD spectra with model compounds with well-defined absolute configurations. Moreover, the absolute configuration of these novel 2,3-cis- and 10,11-cis-isomers of silybin enabled us to propose mechanisms for the cis–trans isomerization of silybin. Although analogous isomerizations of similar compounds at respective C-2, C-3 centers have been described, we present here parallel isomerizations on both chiral centers under kinetic control. cis-Silybins were obtained by the chemoenzymatic separation methods mostly due to the sensitivity of new cis-derivatives to the reversed isomerization.
NMR spectra were recorded in DMSO-d6 (30 °C) by using a Bruker AVANCE 600 NMR spectrometer (600 MHz for 1H, 151 MHz for 13C) with the residual solvent peak as the internal standard. Mass spectra were measured in an APEX-Ultra FTMS with ESI ionization. The high-resolution ESI–MS spectra were measured by using a GCT Premier benchtop orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight mass spectrometer.
Optical rotations were measured with a Rudolph Autopol polarimeter in acetone at 25 °C, and ECD spectra were recorded in a Jasco-815 spectrometer in MeOH from 200 to 400 nm with a scanning speed 20 nm/min, time response 8 s with a 2 mm quartz cell and a sample concentration of ca. 1 mmol/L.
HPLC analyses were carried out in a Shimadzu Prominence LC analytical system consisting of a Shimadzu LC-20AD binary HPLC pump, Shimadzu SIL-20AC cooling autosampler, Shimadzu CTO-10AS column oven, and Shimadzu SPD-20MA diode array detector. The monolithic column was a Chromolith Performance, RP-18e, 100 × 3 mm equipped with a guard column (5 × 4.6 mm) with an isocratic mobile phase CH3CN/MeOH/H2O/HCO2H 2:37:61:0.1, flow rate 1.5 mL/min at 25 °C, detection at 285 nm; tr (silybin A, 1a) = 3.1 min, tr (silybin B, 1b) = 3.7 min, tr (23-O-acetylsilybin A) = 12.7 min, tr (23-O-acetylsilybin B, 2b) = 14.1 min. For the semipreparatory HPLC, a chromolith SemiPrep RP-18e monolithic column, 100 × 10 mm was used with an isocratic mobile phase CH3OH/H2O 50:50. The flow rate was set to 5 mL/min at 25 °C, the UV detection to 285 nm; tr (2a) = 6.6 min, tr (13) = 7.8 min.
Silybin (a mixture of diastereoisomers A (1a) and B (1b), ca. 1:1) was kindly provided by Dr. L. Cvak (division TAPI, Teva Czech Industries s.r.o., IVAX Pharmaceuticals, CZ). Silybin diastereoisomers were separated by lipase-catalyzed discrimination . Candida antarctica lipase B (Novozym 435) was from Novozymes (DK). All other reagents were of analytical grade and used without further purification.
(2R,3S,10R,11R)-23-O-Acetylsilybin (12): BF3·OEt2 (2 mL, 15.926 mmol, 50% solution in OEt2) was added to a stirred solution of 1a (2 g, 4.146 mmol, >99% optical purity) in DMF (15 mL) and further stirred for 1 h at 50 °C. The reaction was quenched by the addition of an ice-cold solution of saturated NaHCO3 (100 mL), extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL), the combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4) and evaporated. The residue was dissolved in MeOH (10 mL) and a few drops of water were added. After several hours, the crystals formed were filtered off (ca. 1.1 g, virtually pure trans-isomer) and the mother liquor was evaporated (0.84 g, ca. 30% of cis-isomer, according to HPLC). The evaporated residue was then dissolved in a mixture of acetone/vinyl acetate (100 mL, 9:1, v/v), Novozym 435 (0.84 g, ≥10000 U/g, 100% w/w) was added, and the mixture was shaken at 45 °C and 650 rpm for 48 h. After enzyme removal by filtration, the solution was evaporated and the crude mixture was purified by column chromatography (CHCl3/acetone/HCO2H 95:5:1, twice) yielding 2a (0.6 g, 30% yield, >98% optical purity) and 12 (0.2 g, 10% yield, >97% optical purity). 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 5. HRMS (ESI–TOF) m/z: [M − H]− calcd for C27H23O11, 523.1246; found, 523.1245.
(2R,3S,10S,11S)-23-O-Acetylsilybin (11) – Method A: This compound was prepared analogously to 12 starting from pure 1b (2 g, 4.146 mmol, >99% optical purity) to yield 343 mg of 11 (17% yield, >97% optical purity). 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 5. HRMS (ESI–TOF) m/z: [M − H]− calcd for C27H23O11, 523.1246; found, 523.1247.
Table 5: NMR spectroscopic data (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 °C) of compounds 12 and 11.
|(2R,3S,10R,11R)-23-O-acetylsilybin (12)||(2R,3S,10S,11S)-23-O-acetylsilybin (11)|
|position||δC||ma||δH (m, J in Hz)||δC||ma||δH (m, J in Hz)|
|2||80.50||d||5.460 (d, 2.4)||80.52||d||5.461 (d, 2.4)|
|3||70.78||d||4.109 (br.d, 2.4, 6.4)||70.79||d||4.113 (dd, 2.4, 6.4)|
|6||96.04||d||5.908 (d, 2.1)||96.05||d||5.912 (d, 2.1)|
|8||95.05||d||5.936 (d, 2.1)||95.05||d||5.940 (d, 2.1)|
|10||75.01||d||4.491 (ddd, 8.0, 5.2, 2.7)||75.02||d||4.492 (ddd, 7.9, 5.2, 2.7)|
|11||75.85||d||4.913 (d, 8.0)||75.86||d||4.915 (d, 7.9)|
|13||116.26||d||7.080 (d, 2.0)||116.27||d||7.083 (d, 2.0)|
|15||120.70||d||7.020 (dd, 8.4, 2.0)||120.70||d||7.022 (dd, 8.3, 2.0)|
|16||116.30||d||6.976 (d, 8.4)||116.31||d||6.978 (d, 8.3)|
|18||111.74||d||7.013 (d, 1.9)||111.74||d||7.014 (d, 2.0)|
|21||115.50||d||6.809 (d, 8.0)||115.51||d||6.812 (d, 8.0)|
|22||120.60||d||6.861 (dd, 8.0, 1.9)||120.61||d||6.863 (dd, 2.0, 8.0)|
|23||62.65||t||4.081 (dd, 2.7, 12.4)||62.66||m||4.084 (dd, 2.7, 12.4)|
|3.926 (dd, 5.2, 12.4)||d||3.928 (dd, 5.2 , 12.4)|
|3-OH||–||–||6.223 (d, 6.4)||–||d||6.227 (d, 6.4)|
|5-OH||–||–||11.861 (s)||–||s||11.863 (s)|
|7-OH||–||–||10.805 (br s)||–||s||10.813 (br s)|
|19-OMe||55.75||q||3.773 (s)||55.75||s||3.775 (s)|
|20-OH||–||–||9.164 (s)||–||d||9.167 (s)|
|23-Ac||20.46||q||2.021 (s)||20.47||m||2.022 (s)|
amultiplicity of 13C signals.
(2R,3S,10S,11S)-23-O-Acetylsilybin (11) – Method B: BF3∙OEt2 (2.3 mL, 18.3 mmol, 50% solution in OEt2) was added to a stirred solution of 1b (3 g, 6.2 mmol, >99% optical purity) in EtOAc (100 mL) and the mixture was stirred for 3 h at 80 °C. The reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of an ice-cold solution of saturated NaHCO3 (100 mL), and after stirring for 10 min both phases were separated. The aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL), the combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4) and evaporated. The residue after flash chromatography (CHCl3/acetone/HCO2H, 97:3:1, twice) yielded title compound 11 (50 mg, 2% yield, >98% optical purity). 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 5. HRMS (ESI–TOF) m/z: [M − H]− calcd. for C27H23O11, 523.1246; found, 523.1246.
(2R,3S,10R,11R)-Silybin (9): Novozym 435 (1 g, ≥10000 U/g) was added to a solution of 12 (200 mg, 0.381 mmol) in a mixture of MTBE/n-butanol (30 mL, 9:1, v/v), and the mixture was shaken at 45 °C and 650 rpm for 100 h. The enzyme was removed by filtration, the solution was evaporated, and the crude mixture purified by column chromatography (CHCl3/acetone/HCO2H from 95:5:1 to 70:30:1) yielding title compound 9 (140 mg, 70% yield, >97% purity). 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 6. [α]D22 −51.6 (c 0.091, acetone); ECD spectrum, see Supporting Information File 1, Figure S2; HRMS (ESI–TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C25H23O10, 483.1291; found, 483.1296.
(2R,3S,10S,11S)-Silybin (10): This compound was prepared analogously to 9 starting from pure 11 (343 mg, 0.654 mmol) to yield 8 (220 mg, 64% yield, >96% purity). 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 6. [α]D22 −40.4 (c 0.39, acetone); ECD spectrum, see Supporting Information File 1, Figure S1; HRMS (ESI–TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd. for C25H23O10, 483.1291; found, 483.1294.
Table 6: NMR spectroscopic data (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 °C) of compounds 9 and 10.
|(2R,3S,10R,11R)-silybin (9)||(2R,3S,10S,11S)-silybin (10)|
|position||δC||ma||δH (m, J in Hz)||δC||ma||δH (m, J in Hz)|
|2||80.60||d||5.441 (ddd, 2.4, 0.7, 0.6)||80.60||d||5.443 (ddd, 2.5, 0.6, 0.4)|
|3||70.81||d||4.092 (br.d, 2.4)||70.82||d||4.087 (m, -)|
|6||96.08||d||5.897 (d, 2.1)||96.07||d||5.903 (d, 2.1)|
|8||95.09||d||5.925 (d, 2.1)||95.08||d||5.934 (d, 2.1)|
|10||78.14||d||4.151 (ddd, 7.9, 4.7, 2.5)||78.15||d||4.144 (ddd, 7.8, 4.7, 2.6)|
|11||75.86||d||4.889 (d, 7.9)||75.90||d||4.891 (d, 7.8)|
|13||116.14||d||7.055 (dd, 2.0, 0.7)||116.15||d||7.052 (dd, 2.0, 0.4)|
|15||120.46||d||6.998 (ddd, 8.3, 2.0, 0.6)||120.47||d||7.001 (ddd, 8.3, 2.0, 0.6)|
|16||116.18||d||6.945 (d, 8.3)||116.19||d||6.947 (d, 8.3)|
|18||111.76||d||7.002 (d, 2.0)||111.79||d||7.003 (d, 1.9)|
|21||115.37||d||6.802 (d, 8.1)||115.38||d||6.803 (d, 8.1)|
|22||120.54||d||6.858 (dd, 8.1, 2.0)||120.55||d||6.860 (dd, 1.9, 8.1)|
|23||60.23||t||3.534 (dd, 2.5, 12.2)||60.24||t||3.532 (m)|
|3.341 (dd, 4.7, 12.2)||3.340 (m)|
|3-OH||–||–||6.216 (br.s)||–||6.212 (br.d, 5.5)|
|5-OH||–||–||11.884 (br.s)||–||11.881 (s)|
|19-OMe||55.75||q||3.777 (s)||55.76||q||3.780 (s)|
|20-OH||–||–||9.151 (br.s)||–||9.118 (br.s)|
amultiplicity of 13C signals.
(2R,3R,10S,11R)-23-O-Acetylsilybin (8): BF3∙OEt2 (1.5 mL, 12.2 mmol, 50% solution in OEt2) was added to a stirred solution of 1b (2 g, 4.1 mmol, >99% optical purity) in EtOAc (100 mL) and the mixture was kept for 48 h at 80 °C. The reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of an ice-cold solution of saturated NaHCO3 (100 mL), and after stirring for 10 min both phases were separated. The aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4) and evaporated to dryness. The crude mixture was purified by column chromatography (CHCl3/acetone/toluene/HCO2H, 95:5:5:1, twice) yielding a mixture of 2b and 8, which was then dissolved in a mixture of MTBE/n-butanol (150 mL, 9:1 v/v), Novozym 435 (0.25 g, ≥10000 U/g, 100% w/w) was added, and the mixture was shaken at 45 °C and 650 rpm for 37 h until the ratio of 8/2b was 96:4 (HPLC). After enzyme removal by filtration, the solution was evaporated, and the crude mixture purified by column chromatography (CHCl3/acetone/HCO2H 90:10:1) yielding 1b (0.898 g, 45% yield, >99% purity) and 12 (0.06 g, 3% yield, >98% purity). 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 7. HRMS (ESI–TOF) m/z: [M − H]− calcd for C27H23O11, 523.1246; found, 523.1244.
(2S,3S,10R,11S)-23-O-Acetylsilybin (13): BF3∙OEt2 (2.7 mL, 21.9 mmol, 50% solution in OEt2) was added to a stirred solution of 1a (2.7 g, 5.6 mmol, >99% optical purity) in EtOAc (30 mL) and the mixture was kept at 80 °C for 48 h. The reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of an ice-cold solution of saturated NaHCO3 (100 mL), and after stirring for 10 min both phases were separated. The aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL), the combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4) and evaporated. The crude mixture was purified by column chromatography (CHCl3/acetone/HCO2H 95:5:1, twice), yielding 12 (0.32 g; 12%, >96% purity) and a mixture of 2a and 13. After evaporation of the solvent, the residue containing compounds 2a and 13 (1 g) was then dissolved in a mixture of MTBE/n-butanol (30 mL, 9:1, v/v), Novozym 435 (0.3 g, ≥10000 U/g, 30% w/w) was added and the mixture was shaken at 45 °C and 650 rpm for 72 h to give a 13/2a ratio of ca. 2:3 (HPLC). After enzyme removal by filtration, the solution was evaporated, and the crude mixture was purified by column chromatography (CHCl3/acetone/HCO2H 90:10:1) to remove 1a. Subsequent preparative HPLC separation (A Chromolith SemiPrep RP-18e monolithic column, 100 × 10 mm, Merck) of the mixture of 2a and 13 was carried out with an isocratic mobile phase CH3OH/H2O 50:50, a flow rate of 5 mL/min at 25 °C, and UV detection at 285 nm; tr (2a) = 6.6 min, tr (13) = 7.8 min.) yielding 2a (20 mg, 0.7% yield, >98% purity) and 13 (7 mg, 0.3% yield, >96% purity). [α]D22 +69.7 (c 0.11, acetone); ECD spectrum, see Supporting Information File 1, Figure S4; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 7; HRMS (ESI–TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C27H24O11Na, 547.1211; found, 547.1209.
Table 7: NMR spectroscopic data (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 °C) of compounds 8 and 13.
|(2R,3R,10S,11R)-23-O-acetylsilybin (8)||(2S,3S,10R,11S)-23-O-acetylsilybin (13)|
|position||δC||ma||δH (m, J in Hz)||δC||ma||δH (m, J in Hz)|
|2||82.48||d||5.101 (d, 11.4)||82.44||d||5.085 (dd, 0.4, 11.3)|
|3||71.46||d||4.618 (dd, 6.1, 11.4)||71.46||d||4.597 (dd, 6.3, 11.3)|
|6||96.13||d||5.923 (d, 2.1)||96.31||d||5.879 (br.s, –)|
|8||95.07||d||5.883 (d, 2.1)||95.31||d||5.848 (br.s, –)|
|10||73.83||d||4.801 (ddd, 2.8, 3.4, 8.2)||73.87||d||4.793 (ddd, 2.9, 3.4, 8.3)|
|11||74.60||d||5.340 (dd, 0.6, 2.8)||74.60||d||5.337 (ddd, 0.4, 0.7, 2.9)|
|13||116.95||d||7.167 (d, 2.0)||116.87||d||7.171 (d, 2.0)|
|15||121.79||d||7.066 (dd, 2.0, 8.3)||121.97||d||7.049 (ddd, 0.4, 2.0, 8.3)|
|16||116.92||d||7.013 (d, 8.3)||116.93||d||7.005 (d, 8.3)|
|18||110.73||d||7.023 (d, 2.0)||110.65||d||7.026 (dd, 0.4, 2.1)|
|21||115.59||d||6.811 (d, 8.2)||115.59||d||6.807 (d, 8.1)|
|22||118.67||d||6.860 (ddd, 0.6, 2.0, 8.2)||118.66||d||6.859 (ddd, 0.7, 2.1, 8.1)|
|23||60.38||t||4.004 (dd, 3.4, 12.2)||55.73||t||3.998 (dd, 3.4, 12.2)|
|3.954 (dd, 8.2, 12.2)||3.995 (dd, 8.3, 12.2)|
|3-OH||–||–||5.783 (d, 6.1)||–||5.769 (d, 6.3)|
|5-OH||–||–||11.875 (s)||–||11.902 (s, –)|
|7-OH||–||–||10.788 (br s)||–||10.860 (br.s, –)|
|19-OMe||55.73||q||3.757 (s)||55.73||q||3.757 (s, –)|
|20-OH||–||–||9.093 (s)||–||9.119 (s, –)|
|23-Ac||20.46||q||1.941 (s)||20.51||q||1.940 (s, –)|
amultiplicity of 13C signals.
(2R,3R,10S,11R)-Silybin (14): Novozym 435 (0.350 g, 500% w/w, ≥10000 U/g) was added to 12 (60 mg, 0.11 mmol) dissolved in a mixture of MTBE/n-butanol (15 mL, 9:1, v/v), and the mixture was shaken at 45 °C and 650 rpm for 120 h. The enzyme was then filtered off, the solution evaporated, and the crude mixture purified by column chromatography (CHCl3/acetone/HCO2H from 97:3:1 to 70:30:1) yielding title compound 14 (40 mg, 67% yield, >98% purity). [α]D22 −59.2 (c 0.13, acetone); ECD spectrum, see Supporting Information File 1, Figure S3; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 8; HRMS (ESI–TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C25H23O10, 483.1291; found, 483.1289
Table 8: NMR spectroscopic data (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 °C) of compound 14.
|position||δC [ppm]||ma||δH (m, J in Hz)|
|2||82.56||d||5.082 (dd, 0.4, 11.4)|
|3||71.44||d||4.608 (dd, 5.8, 11.4)|
|6||96.12||d||5.913 (d, 2.1)|
|8||95.08||d||5.873 (d, 2.1)|
|10||77.36||d||4.464 (ddd, 2.8, 4.0, 7.9)|
|11||75.13||d||5.272 (ddd, 0.5, 0.5, 2.8)|
|13||116.74||d||7.106 (d, 2.0)|
|15||121.36||d||7.037 (ddd, 0.4, 2.0, 8.3)|
|16||116.85||d||6.986 (d, 8.3)|
|18||111.21||d||6.966 (dd, 0.5, 1.8)|
|21||115.44||d||6.770 (d, 8.2)|
|22||119.05||d||6.791 (ddd, 0.5, 1.8, 8.2)|
|23||58.20||t||3.409 (dd, 7.9, 11.6)|
|3.338 (dd, 4.0, 11.6)|
|3-OH||–||–||5.766 (d, 5.8)|
|5-OH||–||–||11.876 (s, –)|
|19-OMe||55.72||q||3.732 (s, –)|
|20-OH||–||–||9.032 (s, –)|
amultiplicity of 13C signals.
All geometries and energies, including the zero-point correction (V), enthalpies (H) and Gibbs energies (G) at 298 K of the reactants, intermediates and products were determined at the (U)B3P86/6-31+G(d,p) level, well-adapted for polyphenol reactivity. Solvent effects were implicitly taken into account by using a PCM (polarizable continuum model) method; the IEFPCM (integral equation formalism PCM) method coupled to UA0 radii was used. The mechanisms were studied with both EtOAc and DMF solvents with a dielectric constant ε of 5.99 and 37.21, respectively.
The hardness η is related to the hard–soft-acid-basis (HSAB) principle. According to this theory, hard acids react with hard bases whereas soft acids react with soft bases. The hardness is given by where I and A are the adiabatic ionization potential and the adiabatic electron affinity, respectively. The hardness of silybin B was not calculated, as the stereochemistry is not expected to significantly modify this parameter. The hardness calculation is based on the HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbiral) and LUMO (lowest occupied molecular orbital) energies, which are the identical for silybin A and B. The hardness was calculated in benzene, EtOAc, and DMF to study the impact of the solvent polarity on the HSAB principle. The hardness of BF3 and silybin A is not significantly modified when the solvent polarity is increased (Table 2).
New methods to rationalize chemical reactivity have been developed in the field of quantum mechanical methods over the past few years. The Fukui function fk(r) has become one of these powerful tools, providing an atomic picture of hardness. For a given atom k, it is given by where fk+(r) and fk−(r) are the electrophilic and nucleophilic contributions of the Fukui function calculated as follows:
and , where qk(N), qk(N−1) and qk(N + 1) are the electronic population of atom k in its neutral, radical-cation and radical-anion forms, respectively. In this study, the Fukui function is used to partially rationalize BF3 complexation. In this case, the nucleophilic contribution is the most important parameter. It must be stressed that the higher the fk−(r), the higher the atomic nucleophilic capacity. All calculations were carried out by using the Gaussian09 software .
|Supporting Information File 1: 1H and 13C NMR spectra of new compounds, ECD spectra of new compounds, HPLC chromatograms of new compounds, table of retention times and purity of the new compounds, XYZ coordinates of optimized silybin A and B and absolute energies.|
|Format: PDF||Size: 2.3 MB||Download|
This work was supported by the grant P207/10/0288 (R.G.) from the Czech Science Foundation, by projects LH13097 and LD13041 from the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic (V.K.), by the ESF COST Chemistry project CM0804 (P.T. and V.K.), and by the Institutional concept RVO61388971. P.T. and F.D.M. wish to thank “Conseil Régional du Limousin” for financial support and CALI (CAlcul en LImousin) for their computing facilities. P.T. gratefully acknowledges the support of the Operational Program Research and Development for Innovation-European Regional Development Fund (project CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0058 of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic). The authors would like to thank Dr. Petr Maloň, Institute of Physics, Charles University in Prague, for his kind assistance with ECD spectra interpretation.