An improved procedure for the preparation of Ru(bpz)3(PF6)2 via a high-yielding synthesis of 2,2’-bipyrazine

  1. Danielle M. Schultz,
  2. James W. Sawicki and
  3. Tehshik P. Yoon

Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1101 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA

  1. Corresponding author email

Associate Editor: I. Marek
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 61–65. doi:10.3762/bjoc.11.9
Received 05 Dec 2014, Accepted 07 Jan 2015, Published 14 Jan 2015

Abstract

There has been a recent surge of interest in the use of transition metal polypyridyl complexes as visible light-absorbing photocatalysts for synthetic applications. Among the most attractive features of this approach is the availability of many known complexes with well-characterized photophysical and electrochemical properties. In particular, Ru(bpz)32+ is a powerful photooxidant that has proven to be uniquely suited for oxidatively induced photoredox transformations. We present here a straightforward and high-yielding route to Ru(bpz)3(PF6)2 that features an improved Pd-catalyzed synthesis of the 2,2’-bipyrazine ligand that is amenable to gram-scale preparations.

Keywords: heterocycles; ligand synthesis; palladium; photocatalysis; reductive coupling

Findings

Visible light-photoredox catalysis using transition metal chromophores is rapidly becoming recognized as an important strategy in organic synthesis [1-5]. This approach towards reaction design enables the facile generation and exploitation of odd-electron intermediates such as radicals and radical ions under exceptionally mild reaction conditions. A large number of transition metal chromophores with well-characterized photophysical and electrochemical properties are known, and the influence of ligand modification on the photoredox properties of these complexes is well understood [6-8]. As a result, a variety of Ru and Ir based chromophores spanning a range of redox potentials have recently become widely utilized in the design of new photocatalytic transformations [9].

In particular, the homoleptic tris(bipyrazyl) complex 2 (Ru(bpz)32+) [10] has emerged as one of the most useful transition metal photocatalysts for oxidatively induced organic transformations (Figure 1). Due to the electron-deficient nature of its bipyrazyl ligands, the excited state redox potential of 2 is quite positive (+1.45 V vs SCE) [11]. Consequently, it is an effective photocatalyst in oxidatively induced photoredox transformations where less strongly oxidizing complexes (e.g., 1) are not successful. For instance, we have reported that 2 is uniquely capable of promoting radical cation mediated Diels–Alder cycloadditions [12], radical thiol–ene couplings [13,14], and photooxygenation reactions [15,16]. Similarly, Zheng has reported oxidatively initiated indole synthesis [17] and [3 + 2] cycloaddition [18,19] reactions using photocatalyst 2. Finally, a variety of transition metal complexes bearing bipyrazyl ligands have been prepared and investigated for a wide range of applications in inorganic and organometallic chemistry [20-25].

[1860-5397-11-9-1]

Figure 1: Influence of ligand structure on photoredox behavior.

Unfortunately, the synthesis of 2,2’-bipyrazyl (bpz) is quite challenging compared to the syntheses of other, structurally similar bidentate bisazene ligands. Various methods for the preparation of bpz have been reported [26-28], the most common of which involve transition metal-catalyzed reductive homocouplings of halopyrazine electrophiles [29,30]. However, we found these procedures to be capricious in our hands, and after a survey of known reductive dimerization protocols, the highest yields of bpz we were able to obtain resulted from a Pd-catalyzed procedure reported by Plé (Scheme 1) [31]. Using this protocol, we were able to obtain only 40% yield of the desired 2,2-bipyrazine ligand on milligram scale, accompanied by a significant degree of undesired reductive dehalogenation. Moreover, the yields on larger scales were unreliable, and work-up and purification of this inefficient coupling reaction proved difficult.

[1860-5397-11-9-i1]

Scheme 1: Pd-catalyzed reductive coupling of 2-chloropyrazine.

Thus, in order to accelerate our investigations of complex 2 as a strongly oxidizing photoredox catalyst, we required a robust, high-yielding, and scalable synthesis of bpz. An improved synthesis of this ligand would be useful both in the context of the growing interest in photoredox catalysis as well as other organometallic and inorganic applications of bpz-supported transition metal complexes.

Our optimization studies for the reductive coupling of 2-halopyrazines are summarized in Table 1. Initial exploratory experiments using 2-chloropyrazine as the substrate gave quite poor yields using either organic or inorganic bases (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). Speculating that oxidative addition into the aryl chloride bond might be problematic in this coupling reaction, we turned our attention towards the use of more reactive aryl iodides. A screen of solvents commonly used in Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions revealed that DMF provided the highest yields (Table 1, entries 3–5). We next examined the effect of varying equivalents of the terminal reductant, and we observed that the presence of excess isopropanol had little effect (Table 1, entries 6 and 7). Finally, an evaluation of the reaction temperature revealed that the coupling proceeded sluggishly at lower temperatures (Table 1, entry 8). Optimal conditions thus called for 5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 2 equiv of isopropanol, and 1.5 equiv of K2CO3 in DMF (0.4 M) at 100 °C; under these conditions, the reaction was complete in 2 h and afforded the desired homocoupling product in 81% isolated yield (Table 1, entry 9).

Table 1: Optimization of Pd-catalyzed reductive homocoupling of 2-halopyrazines.a

[Graphic 1]
entry X solvent equiv iPrOH yieldb
1c Cl toluene 3 3%
2 Cl toluene 3 3%
3 I toluene 3 4%
4 I dioxane 3 10%
5 I DMF 3 85%
6 I DMF 2 87%
7 I DMF 1 83%
8d I DMF 2 44%
9e I DMF 2 85% (81%)f

aConditions: Reactions were conducted on a 0.22 mmol scale using 1 equiv 2-halopyrazine, 5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, and 1.5 equiv K2CO3 at 100 °C unless otherwise noted. bYields determined by 1H NMR analysis using an internal standard. cReaction conducted using 1.5 equiv iPr2NEt instead of K2CO3. dReaction conducted at 60 °C. eReaction conducted for 2 h. fValue in parentheses is the average isolated yield from two reproduced experiments.

Although our investigations were motivated by our specific need to access photocatalyst complex 2, we were pleased to find that the optimal conditions for the synthesis of 2,2’-bipyrazine translated smoothly to the reductive coupling of a variety of pyridyl electrophiles. Table 2 demonstrates the application of these reaction conditions to the syntheses of a number of electron-deficient bipyridyl ligands that have been used to prepare strongly photooxidizing metal–polypyridyl complexes [32-36]. In each case, the requisite aryl iodides are either commercially available or can be easily synthesized by Finkelstein displacement of the aryl chloride with NaI [37].

Table 2: Pd-Catalyzed synthesis of other ligands used to support electron-deficient Ru(II) chromophores.a

[Graphic 2]
entry iodoarene product time yieldb
1 [Graphic 3] [Graphic 4] 4 h 89%
2 [Graphic 5] [Graphic 6] 6 h 85%
3 [Graphic 7] [Graphic 8] 5 h 88%

aConditions: 1.0 equiv 2-iodopyrazine, 1.5 equiv K2CO3, 2 equiv isopropanol, 5% Pd(OAc)2, DMF (0.4 M), 100 °C. bIsolated yield (average of two experiments).

Finally, we explored the scalability of the optimized conditions, and found that they remained applicable on multi-gram scale (Scheme 2). Thus, exposure of 4 g of 2-iodopyrazine to the optimized conditions from Table 1 cleanly produced 1.25 g of 2,2’-bipyrazine in 81% isolated yield. A portion of this material was then carried on to synthesize 689 mg (83% yield) of Ru(bpz)3PF6, showing for the first time that we could efficiently prepare hundreds of milligrams of this important photocatalyst. Importantly, this protocol has proven to be reproducible in the hands of other researchers as well [38].

[1860-5397-11-9-i2]

Scheme 2: Preparative-scale synthesis of Ru(bpz)3(PF6)2.

In conclusion, we have developed an improved, Pd-catalyzed method for the synthesis of 2,2’-bipyrazine, an important ligand with growing utility in the context of visible light photocatalysis. This method is readily scalable to enable the gram-scale preparation of 2,2’-bipryazine, which facilitates the preparative synthesis of the strongly oxidizing photocatalyst Ru(bpz)3(PF6)2 [39].

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Experimental section.
Format: PDF Size: 739.7 KB Download

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Corey R. J. Stephenson and Dr. James Douglas for checking the coupling procedure. Funding for this work was provided by the NIH (GM095666) and a postdoctoral fellowship to D.M.S. (GM105149).

References

  1. Teplý, F. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 2011, 76, 859. doi:10.1135/cccc2011078
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Narayanam, J. M. R.; Stephenson, C. R. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 102. doi:10.1039/b913880n
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Reckenthäler, M.; Griesbeck, A. G. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 2727. doi:10.1002/adsc.201300751
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Prier, C. K.; Rankic, D. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 5322. doi:10.1021/cr300503r
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Schultz, D. M.; Yoon, T. P. Science 2014, 343, 985. doi:10.1126/science.1239176
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Kalyanasundaram, K. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1982, 46, 159. doi:10.1016/0010-8545(82)85003-0
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Juris, A.; Balzani, V.; Barigelletti, F.; Campagna, S.; Belser, P.; von Zelewsky, A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1988, 84, 85. doi:10.1016/0010-8545(88)80032-8
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Flamigni, L.; Barbieri, A.; Sabatini, C.; Ventura, B.; Barigelletii, F. Top. Curr. Chem. 2007, 281, 143. doi:10.1007/128_2007_131
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Douglas, J. J.; Nguyen, J. D.; Cole, K. P.; Stephenson, C. R. J. Aldrichimica Acta 2014, 47, 15.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Crutchley, R. J.; Lever, A. B. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7128. doi:10.1021/ja00543a053
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Haga, M.-A.; Dodsworth, E. S.; Eryavec, G.; Seymour, P.; Lever, A. B. P. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 1901. doi:10.1021/ic00206a041
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Lin, S.; Ischay, M. A.; Fry, C. G.; Yoon, T. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 19350. doi:10.1021/ja2093579
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Tyson, E. L.; Ament, M. S.; Yoon, T. P. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 2046. doi:10.1021/jo3020825
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Tyson, E. L.; Niemeyer, Z. L.; Yoon, T. P. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 1427. doi:10.1021/jo500031g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Parrish, J. D.; Ischay, M. A.; Lu, Z.; Guo, S.; Peters, N. R.; Yoon, T. P. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1640. doi:10.1021/ol300428q
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Lu, Z.; Parrish, J. D.; Yoon, T. P. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 4270. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2014.02.045
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Maity, S.; Zheng, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 9562. doi:10.1002/anie.201205137
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Maity, S.; Zhu, M.; Shinabery, R. S.; Zheng, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 222. doi:10.1002/anie.201106162
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Nguyen, T. H.; Maity, S.; Zheng, N. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 975. doi:10.3762/bjoc.10.96
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. MacQueen, D. B.; Schanze, K. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7470. doi:10.1021/ja00020a003
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Vogler, C.; Schwederski, B.; Klein, A.; Kaim, W. J. Organomet. Chem. 1992, 436, 367. doi:10.1016/0022-328X(92)85067-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Alvila, L.; Pakkanen, T. A.; Krause, O. J. Mol. Catal. 1993, 84, 145. doi:10.1016/0304-5102(93)85047-W
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Schnebeck, R.-D.; Randaccio, L.; Zangrando, E.; Lippert, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 119. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980202)37:1/2<119::AID-ANIE119>3.0.CO;2-X
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Blake, A. J.; Champness, N. R.; Cooke, P. A.; Nicolson, J. E. B. Chem. Commun. 2000, 665. doi:10.1039/a909868b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Liberman-Martin, A. L.; Bergman, R. G.; Tilley, T. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9612. doi:10.1021/ja404339u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Lafferty, J. J.; Case, F. H. J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 1591. doi:10.1021/jo01280a064
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Rillema, D. P.; Allen, G.; Meyer, T. J.; Conrad, D. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 1617. doi:10.1021/ic00153a012
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Bronner, C.; Wenger, O. S. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 3617. doi:10.1039/c3cp55071k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Fort, Y.; Becker, S.; Caubère, P. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 11893. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(01)89303-0
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Dhital, R. N.; Kamonsatikul, C.; Somsook, E.; Sakurai, H. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 3030. doi:10.1039/c3cy00303e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Boully, L.; Turck, A.; Plé, N.; Darabantu, M. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2005, 42, 1423. doi:10.1002/jhet.5570420726
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Monserrat, K.; Foreman, T. K.; Grätzel, M.; Whitten, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 6667. doi:10.1021/ja00412a022
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Elliot, C. M.; Hershenhart, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 7519. doi:10.1021/ja00390a022
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Furue, M.; Maruyama, K.; Oguni, T.; Naiki, M.; Kamachi, M. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 3792. doi:10.1021/ic00044a022
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. McFarland, S. A.; Cheng, K. A. W. Y.; Lee, F. S.; Cozens, F. L.; Schepp, N. P. Can. J. Chem. 2008, 86, 1118. doi:10.1139/v08-161
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Takizawa, S.-y.; Shimada, K.; Sato, Y.; Murata, S. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 2983. doi:10.1021/ic402778x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Plé, N.; Turck, A.; Heynderickx, A.; Quéguiner, G. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 9701. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(98)00526-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. The improved coupling procedure was checked by Prof. Corey R. J. Stephenson and Dr. James Douglas of the University of Michigan, as well as by undergraduate organic chemistry laboratory students at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Ru(bpz)3(PF6)2 prepared using this coupling procedure has recently become commercially available from Sigma-Aldrich (L511773).
    Return to citation in text: [1]

Interesting articles

Martin Weiser, Sergej Hermann, Alexander Penner and Hans-Achim Wagenknecht

Dominik Schmitt, Carolin Regenbrecht, Marius Hartmer, Florian Stecker and Siegfried R. Waldvogel

News

Logo OA

Registration is open for the Beilstein Organic Chemistry Symposium 2018 from 24 to 26 April 2018 in Potsdam, Germany

Logo OA

According to the 2016 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2017), the 2016 Journal Impact Factor is 2.337.

© 2015 Schultz et al; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

 
Back to Article List