Substitution of fluorine in M[C6F5BF3] with organolithium compounds: distinctions between O- and N-nucleophiles

  1. Anton Yu. Shabalin1,2,
  2. Nicolay Yu. Adonin1,2 and
  3. Vadim V. Bardin2,3

1G.K. Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, SB RAS, Acad. Lavrentjev Ave. 5, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
2Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova str. 2, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
3N.N. Vorozhtsov Novosibirsk Institute of Organic Chemistry, SB RAS, Acad. Lavrentjev Ave. 9, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation

  1. Corresponding author email

Associate Editor: V. Gouverneur
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 703–713. doi:10.3762/bjoc.13.69
Received 12 Dec 2016, Accepted 28 Mar 2017, Published 12 Apr 2017


Borates M[C6F5BF3] (M = K, Li, Bu4N) react with organolithium compounds, RLi (R = Me, Bu, Ph), in 1,2-dimethoxyethane or diglyme to give M[4-RC6F4BF3] and M[2-RC6F4BF3]. When R is Me or Bu, the nucleophilic substitution of the fluorine atom at the para position to boron is the predominant route. When R = Ph, the ratio M[4-RC6F4BF3]/M[2-RC6F4BF3] is ca. 1:1. Substitution of the fluorine atom at the ortho position to boron is solely caused by the coordination of RLi via the lithium atom with the fluorine atoms of the BF3 group. This differs from the previously reported substitution in K[C6F5BF3] by O- and N-nucleophiles that did not produce K[2-NuC6F4BF3].

Keywords: C-nucleophile; NMR spectroscopy; nucleophilic substitution; pentafluorophenyltrifluoroborate


Organoborates M[RBX3] (X = OAlk, F) are widely used in various fields of chemistry [1-12]. Their polyfluorinated analogues M[RFBX3] have been used as starting reagents in the synthesis of compounds of hypervalent bromine [13], iodine [14-16] and xenon [17-21]. Over the last 15 years, we reported the successful application of polyfluorinated organoborates K[RC6F4BF3], K[C6F5B(OMe)3] and K[CF2=CFBF3] as boron-containing reagents in the Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions with C-electrophiles [22-27]. Nowadays a common approach to these compounds is based on the transformation of polyfluoroarenes under the action of appropriate reagents into the corresponding organometallic derivatives followed by treating them with suitable boron-containing electrophiles (Scheme 1) [28,29]. In order to further expand this powerful tool for the introduction of polyfluorinated building blocks into organic molecules, the synthesis of a series of polyfluoroaryltrifluoroborates with substituents different from fluorine atoms is desirable.


Scheme 1: Preparation of polyfluoroorganotrifluoroborates.

However, practical application of this route requires the corresponding starting substances ArFX, which in many cases are expensive. An alternative approach is based on modification of easily available potassium pentafluorophenyltrifluoroborate (1-K) and we carried out systematic research in this field. Thus, K[C6F5BF3] was converted into K[2,3,4,5-C6HF4BF3] using NiCl2·6H2O and Zn in the presence of bpy in aprotic polar solvents (DMF, DMA or NMP) [30]. At present the main direction is the study of the substitution of aromatically bonded fluorine atoms in K[C6F5BF3] with nucleophiles of different nature. The salts K[4-ROC6F4BF3] (R = Me, Et, Pr, iPr, Bu, t-Bu, PhCH2, CH2=CHCH2, Ph) were prepared by alkoxydefluorination of K[C6F5BF3] with the corresponding O-nucleophiles RONa or ROK [31]. The nucleophilic substitution of a fluorine atom in K[C6F5BF3] with sodium (potassium) azolides in polar aprotic solvent (DMF, DMSO) at 100–130 °C resulted in K[4-R2NC6F4BF3] (R2N = pyrrolyl, pyrazolyl, imidazolyl, indolyl, and benzimidazolyl) with 74–93% isolated yield. In contrast, sodium morpholinide and sodium diethylamide did not react with K[C6F5BF3] under the same conditions. The attempted preparation of K[4-R2NC6F4BF3] (R2N = morpholinyl, Et2N) using an excess of dialkylamine as well as morpholine and K2CO3 leads to C6F5H and dialkylaminotetrafluorobenzene [32]. Additional experiments on the competitive nucleophilic substitution of 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobiphenyl (model substrate) with sodium indolide and sodium morpholinide (DMF, 130 °C, 4 h) showed the kinetic reason of this phenomenon: the first nucleophile reacts with the substrate much faster than the second one. In the case of K[C6F5BF3] this leads to the formation of C6F5H (byproduct) rather than the formation of K[4-R2NC6F4BF3] due very slow aminodefluorination with NaNR2 [32].

Being interested in a wide series of polyfluoroaryltrifluoroborates, we investigated possible reaction routes from M[C6F5BF3] (M = K, Li and Bu4N) to alkyl-, alkynyl- and aryltetrafluorophenyltrifluoroborates using the nucleophilic substitution with some organolithium compounds. The obtained results were compared with previously reported data [31,32].


Reactions with MeLi

An addition of MeLi (1.5 equiv) in ether to a solution of K[C6F5BF3] (1-K) in DME causes precipitation of a white solid. Stirring of the suspension at 22 °C for 3 h with subsequent treatment with aqueous KF gave potassium 4-methyltetrafluorophenyltrifluoroborate, K[4-MeC6F4BF3] (2-K) and potassium 2-methyltetrafluorophenyltrifluoroborate, K[2-MeC6F4BF3] (3-K) (1:0.13) besides unreacted 1-K (total conversion 51%) (Table 1, entry 1). A prolongation of the reaction time up to 6 h has no effect on composition of products (Table 1, entry 2). In the presence of a large excess of the nucleophile (2.5 equiv of MeLi) conversion of 1-K increases up to 85% (Table 1, entry 3) and 100% (3.6 equiv of MeLi) (Table 1, entry 4). When the reaction was performed at 43–47 °C for 3 h, the conversion of 1-K was 83%, but the yield of borate 2-K was lower because of side reactions (mainly, hydrodeboration) (Table 1, entry 5). The reflux of 1-K with 2.0 equiv of MeLi in DME–ether for 5 h gave 2-K and 3-K besides a small quantity of 1-K (Table 1, entry 6) (Scheme 2).

Table 1: Reaction of K[C6F5BF3] (1-K) with methyllithium (22 °C, 3 h).

entry 1-K, mg (mmol) DME, mL MeLi, mL (mmol) conversion of 1-K, %a selectivity, %a
2-K 3-K
1 97 (0.35) 3 1.5 (0.54) 51 83 11
2 115 (0.41)b 3 1.7 (0.61) 59 79 8
3 108 (0.39) 4 2.7 (0.97) 85 73 9
4 276 (1.0) 3 10 (3.6) 100 55 5
5 113 (0.41)c 3 2.7 (0.97) 83 15
6 170 (0.62)d 2 2 (1.28) 92 39 4

afrom 19F NMR data; bduration 6 h; cat 43–47 °C. Reaction mixture contained C6F5H (0.03 mmol, selectivity 9%) and 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorotoluene (4) (0.05 mmol, selectivity 15%) and minor unknown components; dreaction mixture was refluxed for 5 h (53–55 °C, bath); the filtrate contained unknown minor products besides the borates 1-K, 2-K, and 3-K.


Scheme 2: Interaction of K[C6F5BF3] (1-K) with methyllithium (byproducts of hydrodeboration are not depicted).

The use of 3.9 equiv of the nucleophile and reflux of the suspension for 1 h led to the total consumption of 1-K but the desired aryltrifluoroborates were not obtained. Instead, a mixture of many unknown products forms in which a small amount 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorotoluene (4) was identified. Treatment of these products with aqueous KF increased the content of 4 and led to the appearance of C6F5H and 2,3,4,5-tetrafluorotoluene (5) (19F NMR), which may be attributed to hydrodeboration of unrecognized arylboron compounds.

Reactions with BuLi

In general, reactions of 1-K with BuLi proceed as reactions with MeLi although the precipitation was not observed. The reaction of BuLi (2 equiv) with 1-K in DME–hexanes at 22 °C for 2 h and the subsequent treatment of the reaction mixture with aqueous KF gave potassium 4-butyltetrafluorophenyltrifluoroborate (6-K) and potassium 2-butyltetrafluorophenyltrifluoroborate (7-K) (molar ratio 1:0.18) (Table 2, entry 1). In the presence of a larger excess of BuLi the quantity of 7-K reduced to 1:0.10, presumably because of further substitution (Table 2, entry 2). Heating the reaction mixture at 55–60 °C for 1 h leads to substitution of two fluorine atoms with the formation of potassium 2,5-dibutyltrifluorophenyltrifluoroborate (8) and potassium 2,4-dibutyltrifluorophenyltrifluoroborate (9) (minor) besides 6-K and 7-K (major) (Table 2, entry 3). Using Li[C6F5BF3] (1-Li) or [Bu4N][C6F5BF3] (1-N) gives the corresponding salts 6-Li, 7-Li and 6-N, 7-N (Table 2, entries 4–6) (Scheme 3). An analytically pure sample of 6-K was isolated by crystallization of a mixture of 6-K and 7-N from MeCN.

Table 2: Reaction of M[C6F5BF3] (1-M) with butyllithium (22 °C, 2 h).

entry M 1-M, mg (mmol) DME, mL BuLi, mL (mmol) conversion of 1-M, %a selectivity, %a
6-M 7-M
1 K 94 (0.34) 4 0.3 (0.72) 100 65 12
2 K 279 (1.0) 10 1.2 (2.8) 100 65 7
3 K 162 (0.59)b 3 0.5 (1.2) 100 71 5
4 Li 418 (1.50) 6 1.3 (3.1) 97 68 10
5 Bu4N 200 (0.41) 3 0.4 (0.96) 56 52 35
6 Bu4N 429 (0.90) 6c 1.0 (2.5) 80 74 25

afrom 19F NMR data; bat 55–60 °C (bath) for 1 h; the reaction mixture contained K[2,5-Bu2C6F3BF3] (8) (0.02 mmol, selectivity 3%) and K[2,4-Bu2C6F3BF3] (9) (0.03 mmol, selectivity 5%); cin diglyme.


Scheme 3: Interaction of M[C6F5BF3] (1-M) with butyllithium (byproducts of hydrodeboration are not depicted).

Reactions with PhLi

The addition of PhLi in ether to a solution of 1-K in DME leads to the formation of a precipitate similar to that in the reaction with MeLi. Contrary to the nucleophilic alkylation, the use of equimolar amounts of phenyllithium leads to complete consumption of 1-K and the formation of potassium 4-phenyltetrafluorophenyltrifluoroborate (10-K), potassium 2-phenyltetrafluorophenyltrifluoroborate (11-K) and admixtures of potassium 2,5-diphenyltrifluorophenyltrifluoroborate (12-K) and potassium 2,4-diphenyltrifluorophenyltrifluoroborate (13-K) (Table 3, entry 1). The reaction of 1-K with a subequimolar amount of phenyllithium (0.8 equiv) in DME–ether at 22 °C for 2 h gave a mixture of starting borate, and small amounts of 10-K and 11-K (Table 3, entry 2). Prolongation of the reaction time up to 6 h increases yields of 10-K and 11-K but 1-K remains a predominant component (Table 3, entry 3). When 1-K reacts with a three-fold excess of PhLi, the yields of monoarylated borates 10-K and 11-K become equal to that of diarylated borates 12-K and 13-K (Table 3, entry 4). In the presence of large excess of nucleophile borates 12-K and 13-K are the main products while compounds 10-K and 11-K were present in trace amounts (Table 3, entry 5, Scheme 4). Some unknown by-products were also formed.

Table 3: Reaction of K[C6F5BF3] (1-K) with phenyllithium (22 °C, 2 h).

entry 1-K, mg (mmol) DME, mL PhLi, mmol conversion of 1-K, %a selectivity, %a
10-K 11-K 12-K 13-K
1 94 (0.34) 3 0.36 100 21 38 3 15
2 131 (0.48) 3 0.39 33 19 25    
3b 137 (0.50) 5 0.42 52 42 38    
4 124 (0.45) 5 1.40 100 27 20 4 40
5 95 (0.34) 3 2.10 100 6   6 53
6c 132 (0.48) 5 0.77 96 35 33   4

afrom 19F NMR data; b6 h; cat 37–40 °C for 1 h; reaction mixture contained 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobiphenyl (14, 0.01 mmol, selectivity 2%) and 2,3,4,5-tetrafluorobiphenyl (15, 0.02 mmol, selectivity 4%); borates 1, 10, 11 and 13 are lithium salts.


Scheme 4: Interaction of K[C6F5BF3] (1-K) with phenyllithium (byproducts of hydrodeboration are not depicted).

When 1-K reacts with an excess of PhLi (1.6 equiv) at 37–40 °C for 1 h, the supernatant after treatment with aqueous KF contains 10-K and 11-K besides traces of 1-K and 13-K (Table 3, entry 6). Additionally, 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobiphenyl (14) and 2,3,4,5-tetrafluorobiphenyl (15) were found.

Reactions with PhC≡CLi

Attempts to involve 1-K in the reaction with PhC≡CLi failed. Stirring the reagents in DME–ether solution at 22 °C for 17 h leads to recovery of borate 1-K. The same result was obtained at 40 °C (2 h) and under reflux (58 °C, bath) for 5 h. It should be noted that in all cases 1-K was recovered unchanged, e.g., no side reactions occurred.

In addition to identifying the reaction products by NMR spectroscopy, we confirmed their constitution by using the hydrodeboration reaction. This method consists in replacement of the BF3 group in polyfluoroaryltrifluoroborates by hydrogen in alcohol at elevated temperature and obtaining the corresponding polyfluoroarenes in high yields. The latter are more simple substances and available for analysis by NMR spectroscopy, GC–MS and HRMS methods [33].

Heating a mixture of 6-K, 7-K, 8-K and 9-K in MeOH leads to conversion of these salts to 16, 17, 18 and 19, respectively. The molar ratio of the produced polyfluoroarenes is the same as the ratio of their organoboron precursors (Scheme 5).


Scheme 5: Hydrodeboration of 6-K, 7-K, 8-K and 9-K in MeOH.

The 19F NMR spectrum of 17 was described [34] and the spectrum of 16 is closely related to the spectrum of known compound 4 [33]. The structures of 18 and 19 are consistent with 19F NMR, GC–MS and HRMS data.

For characterization of the products derived from 1-K and PhLi we performed the hydrodeboration of a mixture of 1-K, 10-K and 11-K by stirring it in 2-methoxyethanol under reflux. After evaporation of the alcohol and C6F5H, the known 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobiphenyl (14) [35,36] and 2,3,4,5-tetrafluorobiphenyl (15) [35,36] were obtained (Scheme 6).


Scheme 6: Hydrodeboration of 1-K, 10-K and 11-K in methyl cellosolve.

Then a mixture of borates 10-K, 11-K, 12-K, and 13-K was converted to biphenyls 14, 15, and terphenyls 20, 21, respectively, and characterized by 19F NMR spectroscopy, GC–MS and HRMS (Scheme 7).


Scheme 7: Hydrodeboration of 10-K, 11-K, 12-K and 13-K in MeOH.


Above we mentioned that an addition of MeLi or PhLi in ether to a solution of 1-K in DME caused immediate precipitation. The combination of 1-K in DME with BuLi in hexanes or PhC≡CLi in ether does not lead to the formation of a solid phase. Because etherial solutions of MeLi and PhLi were prepared from lithium and MeI or PhBr, they contain the corresponding lithium halides. It follows that the precipitate consists of KI and KBr, respectively, and the actual boron-containing reactant is lithium pentafluorophenyltrifluoroborate (1-Li). Independently, Li[C6F5BF3] was prepared by metathesis of 1-K with LiHal (Hal = Cl, Br, I) in an approapriate solvent (Scheme 8). After determination of the salt concentration by 19F NMR, 1-Li was used in DME without isolation. When the metathesis was performed in MeCN, the lithium salt was isolated from MeCN as solid solvate Li[C6F5BF3]·2MeCN. Dissolution of the solvate in DME leads to liberation of free MeCN (1H NMR). [Bu4N][C6F5BF3] (1-N) was prepared in similar way from 1-K and [Bu4N]Br in MeCN and after removal of the solvent from the supernatant it was dissolved in DME or diglyme.


Scheme 8: Preparation of 1-Li and 1-N.

In the course of these experiments we paid attention on distinctions in the NMR spectra of M[C6F5BF3] (M = Li, K, Bu4N) (Table 4).

Table 4: The 11B and 19F NMR spectra of M[C6F5BF3]a.

borate solvent δ(B) δ(F)
BF3 F2,6 F4 F3,5
Li[C6F5BF3] DME 2.31 −137.2 −134.1 −161.3 −165.9
Li[C6F5BF3] CD3CN 1.73 −135.3 −134.6 −159.9 −164.9
K[C6F5BF3] DME 2.24 −134.2 −134.4 −161.3 −165.6
K[C6F5BF3] [28] CD3CN 1.81 −133.4 −135.2 −160.7 −165.3
[Bu4N][C6F5BF3] DME 1.89 −132.4 −133.1 −162.6 −166.3
[Bu4N][C6F5BF3] diglyme 1.68 −132.4 −133.1 −162.0 −165.8

ain all cases 1J(B, F) = 43–44 Hz and 3J(F4, F3,5) ca. 20 Hz.

The replacement of Li+ by K+ and Bu4N+ is accompanied with remarkable changes in the NMR spectra. In the 11B NMR spectrum the signal of BF3 group shifts from 2.31 (M = Li) to 2.24 (M = K) and 1.89 (M = Bu4N) ppm (in DME). In solutions of 1-N in diglyme and CH2Cl2 this signal locates at 1.68 and 1.51 ppm, respectively. The opposite is the case in the 19F NMR spectra. The signal of BF3 group shifts from −137.2 (1-Li) to −134.2 (1-K) and −132.4 (1-N) ppm in DME solution or to −134.1 ppm (1-N) in CH2Cl2. The positions of the fluorine atoms of the C6F5 moiety are weakly sensitive to the nature of the counteranion although the fluorine atoms F2,6 of 1-N in CH2Cl2 are somewhat shielded with respect to those in diglyme and DME. It is reasonable to assume that these spectral phenomena reflect the different solvation of M[C6F5BF3]. Detailed investigations in this field are out of the scope of the current research but some qualitative considerations may be outlined. In solution of 1-Li in DME the lithium cation is strongly coordinated with one or multiple fluorine atoms bonded to boron (“hard”–“hard” interaction) and with solvent molecules to form contact ion pair [37]. The opposite situation is in 1-N where the bulky tetrabutylammonium cation (“soft”) interacts with those fluorine atom(s) weaker than Li+ either in DME and diglyme and this salt forms solvent-separated ion pairs. Potassium pentafluorophenyltrifluoroborate is the intermediate position. The 11B and 19F NMR chemical shifts of BF3 group in 1-K in DME are closely related to the shifts of 1-Li in the same solvents and reflect the formation of contact ion pairs. In acetonitrile the salts 1-Li and 1-N form solvent-separated ion pairs (11B and 19F NMR). These observations eludicate the effect of counteractions on the isomer compositions of M[RC6F4BF3]. In DME both salts, 1-Li and 1-K, exist as the contact ion pairs and thus the molar ratios of [4-BuC6F4BF3]/[2-BuC6F4BF3] should be similar. Indeed, the ratio of these products derived from 1-Li and 1-K are 1:0.15 and 1:0.18, respectively. Nucleophilic methylation of 1-Li also results in a related value 1:(0.10–0.13) (Table 1, Table 2), i.e., the isomer ratio remains constant within the experimental error. Salt 1-N exists in DME as solvent-separated ion pair. Because of this the fluorine atom of BF3 is more accessible to coordinate RLi and the ratio [4-BuC6F4BF3] to [2-BuC6F4BF3] becomes 1:0.66. Diglyme is a more bulky ligand and that ratio decreases to 1:0.35 (Table 2, entries 5 and 6).

When R = Ph, the ratio [4-PhC6F4BF3]/[2-PhC6F4BF3] derived from 1-Li and 0.8 equiv of PhLi increases up to 1:(0.9–1.3) (Table 3, entries 2, 3 and 6). Other data from Table 3 are not reliable for comparison because the initial ratio is remarkably corrupted by the further reactions. We believe that the enrichment of the reaction mixture in [2-PhC6F4BF3] occurs because of an additional stabilization of transition state A (Scheme 9) due to the π-stacking interactions between C6H5 and C6F5 moieties (Scheme 10), which is excluded in cases of nucleophilic alkylation.


Scheme 9: Formation of 2-R-tetrafluorophenyltrifluoroborates.


Scheme 10: Interaction between C6F5BF3 and PhLi.

While reactions of K[C6F5BF3] with C-nucleophiles give the significant amount of K[2-NuC6F4BF3] the related isomers are not formed under the action of O-nucleophiles, RONa, and N-nucleophiles, AzNa (Az = azol-1-yl). Only a few borates K[3,4-Az2C6F3BF3] (Az = indol-1-yl, benzimidazol-1-yl) were detected in the last reaction [32]. The substitution of a fluorine atom in 1-K by the RO group (in the reaction with 1 equiv of RONa) gives only K[4-ROC6F4BF3] [31]. However, the reaction with 3 equiv of MeONa under the same conditions gives potassium 3,4-dimethoxytrifluorophenyltrifluoroborate (22) and potassium 2,4-dimethoxytrifluorophenyltrifluoroborate (23) besides K[4-MeOC6F4BF3] and 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenol. The latter are formed because of some moisture in MeOH [31] (Scheme 11).


Scheme 11: Interaction of 1-K with MeONa.

In our opinion, the reason of the negligible content of isomer [2-NuC6F4BF3] is the lesser affinity to fluoride of Na+ and K+ compared with Li+ (considerations on the relative fluoride affinities are grounded on the crystal lattice energy of LiF (1027 kJ·mol−1), NaF (914 kJ·mol−1) and KF (812 kJ·mol−1) [38]) and the ionic nature of RO–M and RR'N–M (M = K, Na) bonds in the examined nucleophiles. Even in spite of the possible coordination of K+ or Na+ with the BF3 group, free anions RO or RR'N attack the carbon atom C-4 rather than C-2 and C-6.

The tolerance of 1-K towards PhC≡CLi is a consequence of the low nucleophilicity of PhC≡CLi. For instance, C6F6 and C6F5C6F5 do not react with PhC≡CLi in ether, although the addition of a coordinating solvent (DME, diglyme [39], THF [40]) accelerates nucleophilic substitution. C6F5CH3 bearing the non-electron-withdrawing substituent CH3I ≈ 0.0 [41]) remains inert towards PhC≡CLi even in DME–ether [39].

When pentafluorophenyltrifluoroborates react with MeLi (Table 1, entries 5 and 6) or PhLi (Table 3, entry 6) in DME–ether at elevated temperature, partial hydrodeboration of M[RC6F4BF3] as well as M[R2C6F3BF3] occurs in addition to nucleophilic substitution. This process was not observed for BuLi in hexanes and PhC≡CLi in ether at 40–60 °C. We assumed that this side reaction proceeds because of the interaction of M[RC6F5BF3] with LiHal, which is present in solutions of MeLi and PhLi in ether and absent in solutions of BuLi and PhC≡CLi. Indeed, heating 1-K with LiHal (Hal = I, Br, or Cl) in DME at 55–70 °C leads to the formation of C6F5H. [Bu4N][C6F5BF3] reacts with LiI in diglyme in a similar way. Because the cations K+ or Bu4N+ are replaced with Li+ in all cases, the reactions proceed via the lithium salt. Actually, the salt Li[C6F5BF3] prepared from 1-K and an excess of LiI at 22 °C in quantitative yield converted to C6F5H in high yield when being heated in DME at 55–70 °C (Scheme 12). A similar reaction of 1-K occurs in MeOH in the presence of LiCl [33].


Scheme 12: Interaction of M[RC6F5BF3] with lithium halides.

Presumably, one role of lithium halides is the fluoride abstraction from lithium aryltrifluoroborate (or significant polarization of the B–F bond) and the subsequent hydrodeboration of aryldifluoroborane by residual moisture in the solvent (Scheme 13). This assumption is evidenced by the fact that lithium salts are used as catalysts for the reverse transformation of organotrifluoroborates in the corresponding organoboronic acids.


Scheme 13: Assumed role of lithium halides.

In the absence of LiHal, borate 1-Li does not change in DME (22 °C, 1 week; 60–68 °C, 5 h), and neither does 1-N in diglyme (22 °C, 1 year; 60–68 °C, 5 h). This observation contrasts with the reactivity of the close analogue, Li[C6F5B(OMe)3], which undergoes hydrodeboration in methanol, acetone or acetonitrile. Li[C6F5B(OMe)3] converts to Li[(C6F5)2B(OMe)2] and Li[B(OMe)4] at 22 °C in DME. Also disproportionation of M[C6F5B(OMe)3] (M = Li, K) proceeds in weakly coordinated CH2Cl2 in the presence of [Bu4N]Br or KF while in the absence of other salts the lithium salt is relatively stable. This phenomenon was explained by the formation of a dinuclear methoxy-bridged borate intermediate [C6F5B(OMe)2–(μ-OMe)–B(OMe)2C6F5] (B) followed the migration of both the aryl and the methoxy groups. If Li+ and [C6F5B(OMe)3] form a contact ion pair (solution of Li[C6F5B(OMe)3] in CH2Cl2), such migration of OMe and its subsequent elimination is hindered [42]. In the case of pentafluorophenyltrifluoroborates the similar conversion does not occur even with Li[C6F5BF3] in DME (contact ion pairs) due to the higher Lewis acidity of C6F5BF2 relative to C6F5B(OMe)2, which prevents the formation of fluoro-bridged intermediates such as B.


1. Nucleophilic substitution of fluorine atoms in M[C6F5BF3] (M = K, Li, Bu4N) with MeLi or BuLi at 22 °C and subsequent treatment with aqueous KF leads preferentially to K[4-RC6F4BF3] while K[2-RC6F4BF3] is a minor isomer (R = Me, Bu). Under the same conditions, the reaction with PhLi gives approximately equimolar amounts of K[4-PhC6F4BF3] and K[2-PhC6F4BF3] and remarkable amounts of K[2,5-Ph2C6F3BF3] and K[2,4-Ph2C6F3BF3]. The substitution of two fluorine atoms by the butyl group at 55–60 °C gives the related isomers while a complex mixture forms from K[C6F5BF3] and MeLi at the same temperature. K[C6F5BF3] does not react with PhC≡CLi in DME–ether under reflux because the low reactivity of C-nucleophile.

2. Because solutions of MeLi and PhLi contain LiBr or LiI, the salts M[C6F5BF3] (M = K, Bu4N) undergo metathesis with the formation of Li[C6F5BF3]. The latter is the actual reagent in the reactions of nucleophilic substitution. BuLi in hexanes does not contain LiHal and thus it reacts with K[C6F5BF3].

3. According to the 11B and 19F NMR data, salts Li[C6F5BF3] and K[C6F5BF3] exists as contact ion pairs in DME and solvent-separated ion pairs in CH3CN. [Bu4N][C6F5BF3] forms solvent-separated ion pairs in DME or diglyme. The sort of solvation affects the ratio M[4-RC6F4BF3]/M[2-RC6F4BF3]: In case of the contact ion pairs the contribution of the ortho alkylation is minimal (M = K, Li). During nucleophilic phenylation the π–stacking interaction between C6H5 and C6F5 moieties can be responsible for increased yield of M[2-PhC6F4BF3].

4. The formation of M[2-RC6F4BF3] proceeds through the coordination of RLi (polarized C–Li bond) to a fluorine atom of the BF3 moiety and subsequent elimination of LiF. In contrary, the cation–anion bonds in O-nucleophiles and in N-nucleophiles are ionic (M = K, Na) and the fluoride affinities of K+ and Na+ are smaller than that of Li+. These factors determine the reaction route with K[C6F5BF3] by a simple SN2 mechanism.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Full experimental details and compounds characterization data.
Format: PDF Size: 135.6 KB Download


The authors would like to express gratitude for financial support from the Russian Fund of Basic Research through Grant No. 16-29-10762 ofi_m. The NMR spectra and GC-MS data were obtained in the Collective service center of SB RAS (N.N. Vorozhtsov Novosibirsk Institute of Organic Chemistry SB RAS).


  1. Stefani, H. A.; Cella, R.; Vieira, A. S. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 3623–3658. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2007.01.061
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Darses, S.; Genet, J.-P. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 288–325. doi:10.1021/cr0509758
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Molander, G. A.; Canturk, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9240–9261. doi:10.1002/anie.200904306
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Molander, G. A.; Sandrock, D. L. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2009, 12, 811–823.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Perrin, D. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 1333–1343. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00398
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Savitha, B.; Sajith, A. M.; Joy, M. N.; Khader, K. K. A.; Muralidharan, A.; Padusha, M. S. A.; Bodke, Y. D. Aust. J. Chem. 2016, 69, 618–630. doi:10.1071/ch15420
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Fisher, K. M.; Bolshan, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 12676–12685. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.5b02273
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Brady, P. B.; Carreira, E. M. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 3350–3353. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01607
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Liu, Z.; Chao, D.; Li, Y.; Ting, R.; Oh, J.; Perrin, D. M. Chem. – Eur. J. 2015, 21, 3924–3928. doi:10.1002/chem.201405829
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Erős, G.; Kushida, Y.; Bode, J. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7604–7607. doi:10.1002/anie.201403931
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Berionni, G.; Morozova, V.; Heininger, M.; Mayer, P.; Knochel, P.; Mayr, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 6317–6324. doi:10.1021/ja4017655
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Lee, J.-H.; Kim, H.; Kim, T.; Song, J. H.; Kim, W.-S.; Ham, J. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2013, 34, 42–48. doi:10.5012/bkcs.2013.34.1.42
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Frohn, H.-J.; Giesen, M.; Welting, D.; Bardin, V. V. J. Fluorine Chem. 2010, 131, 922–932. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2010.06.006
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Frohn, H.-J.; Wenda, A.; Flörke, U. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2008, 634, 764–770. doi:10.1002/zaac.200700499
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Frohn, H.-J.; Hirschberg, M. E.; Wenda, A.; Bardin, V. V. J. Fluorine Chem. 2008, 129, 459–473. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2008.04.001
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Frohn, H.-J.; Bardin, V. V. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2008, 634, 82–86. doi:10.1002/zaac.200700319
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Frohn, H.-J.; Bardin, V. V. Organoxenonium Salts: Synthesis by "Xenodeborylation", Reactivities, and NMR Spectroscopic Properties. In Recent Developments in Carbocation and Onium Ion Chemistry; Laali, K. K., Ed.; ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 965; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2007; pp 428–457. doi:10.1021/bk-2007-0965.ch020
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Koppe, K.; Frohn, H.-J.; Mercier, H. P. A.; Schrobilgen, G. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 3205–3217. doi:10.1021/ic702259c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Koppe, K.; Bilir, V.; Frohn, H.-J.; Mercier, H. P. A.; Schrobilgen, G. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 9425–9437. doi:10.1021/ic7010138
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Frohn, H.-J.; Bardin, V. V. Mendeleev Commun. 2007, 17, 137–138. doi:10.1016/j.mencom.2007.05.001
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Frohn, H.-J.; Bardin, V. V. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 3948–3953. doi:10.1002/ejic.200600366
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Adonin, N. Y.; Babushkin, D. E.; Parmon, V. N.; Bardin, V. V.; Kostin, G. A.; Mashukov, V. I.; Frohn, H.-J. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 5920–5924. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.04.043
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Bardin, V. V.; Shabalin, A. Y.; Adonin, N. Y. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 608–616. doi:10.3762/bjoc.11.68
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Shabalin, A. Y.; Adonin, N. Y.; Bardin, V. V.; Parmon, V. N. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 3720–3725. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2014.04.019
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Frohn, H.-J.; Adonin, N. Y.; Bardin, V. V.; Starichenko, V. F. J. Fluorine Chem. 2002, 117, 115–120. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(02)00157-4
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Frohn, H.-J.; Adonin, N. Y.; Bardin, V. V.; Starichenko, V. F. J. Fluorine Chem. 2003, 122, 195–199. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(03)00088-5
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Frohn, H.-J.; Adonin, N. Y.; Bardin, V. V.; Starichenko, V. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8111–8114. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(02)01922-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Frohn, H.-J.; Franke, H.; Fritzen, P.; Bardin, V. V. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 598, 127–135. doi:10.1016/S0022-328X(99)00690-7
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  29. Adonin, N. Y.; Bardin, V. V.; Frohn, H.-J. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 2008, 73, 1681–1692. doi:10.1135/cccc20081681
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Adonin, N. Y.; Prikhod’ko, S. A.; Bardin, V. V.; Parmon, V. N. Mendeleev Commun. 2009, 19, 260–262. doi:10.1016/j.mencom.2009.09.009
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Shabalin, A. Y.; Adonin, N. Y.; Bardin, V. V.; Prikhod'ko, S. A.; Timofeeva, M. N.; Bykova, M. V.; Parmon, V. N. J. Fluorine Chem. 2013, 149, 82–87. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2013.01.020
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  32. Shabalin, A. Y.; Adonin, N. Y.; Bardin, V. V.; Taran, O. P.; Ayusheev, A. B.; Parmon, V. N. J. Fluorine Chem. 2013, 156, 290–297. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2013.07.011
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  33. Adonin, N. Y.; Shabalin, A. Y.; Bardin, V. V. J. Fluorine Chem. 2014, 168, 111–120. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2014.09.016
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  34. Bogachev, A. A.; Kobrina, L. S. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 33, 681–683.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Bolton, R.; Sandall, J. P. B.; Williams, G. H. J. Fluorine Chem. 1974, 4, 355–361. doi:10.1016/S0022-1139(00)85284-7
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  36. Wei, Y.; Kan, J.; Wang, M.; Su, W.; Hong, M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3346–3349. doi:10.1021/ol901200g
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  37. Szwarc, M. Ions and Ion Pairs in Organic Reactions; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1974.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Stokes, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 982–986. doi:10.1021/ja01060a003
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Coe, P. L.; Tatlow, J. C.; Terrell, R. C. J. Chem. Soc. C 1967, 2626–2628. doi:10.1039/J39670002626
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  40. Wiles, M. R.; Massey, A. G. J. Organomet. Chem. 1973, 47, 423–432. doi:10.1016/S0022-328X(00)81754-4
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Hansch, C.; Leo, A.; Taft, R. W. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 165–195. doi:10.1021/cr00002a004
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Adonin, N. Y.; Bardin, V. V.; Flörke, U.; Frohn, H.-J. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2005, 631, 2638–2646. doi:10.1002/zaac.200500083
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2017 Shabalin et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (

Back to Article List