Anomeric sugar boronic acid analogues as potential agents for boron neutron capture therapy

  1. Daniela ImperioORCID Logo,
  2. Erika Del GrossoORCID Logo,
  3. Silvia FallariniORCID Logo,
  4. Grazia Lombardi and
  5. Luigi PanzaORCID Logo

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Largo Donegani 2, 28100 Novara, Italy

  1. Corresponding author email

Associate Editor: S. Flitsch
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019, 15, 1355–1359. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.15.135
Received 18 Apr 2019, Accepted 11 Jun 2019, Published 19 Jun 2019

Abstract

After the development of accelerators as neutron source, the access to new suitable agents for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) became a major need. Among many others, sugar boronic acids have recently attracted attention as boron carriers. Herein we report the synthesis and preliminary biological studies of two new sugar analogues containing a boronic acid at the anomeric position. The analogues were obtained by hydroboration of proper open-chain terminal alkenes that, after quenching with water, spontaneously afforded cyclic boronic acids with hemiacetal-like structures.

Keywords: antitumor agents; boron neutron capture therapy; boronic acid; hydroboration; sugar analogue

Introduction

Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) belongs to the so-called binary therapies for cancer treatment. It is based on the fission reaction after a low-energy neutron capture by a 10B atom. The neutron capture reaction gives rise to two high linear energy transfer (LET) particles (an α-particle and a lithium ion) that dissipate all their energy in a path of the order of a cell diameter (5–9 μm) in biological tissues, which gives them the potential for precise cell damage. Highly selective delivery, accumulation of boron in tumor tissues and proper subcellular distribution are required to achieve a successful neutron capture therapy [1].

10B atoms to be administered should be incorporated into non-toxic structures. So far, the two compounds currently used for clinical trials are sodium mercaptoundecahydrododecaborate (Na2B12H11SH, BSH) and ʟ-boronophenylalanine (BPA). However, these two compounds are not fully satisfactory owing to their rapid clearance from blood [2], their only moderate selectivity for cancer cells and short retention times in tumors. Therefore, research efforts are ongoing to synthesize new BNCT candidates with improved tumor selectivity and cell retention.

The development of boron-containing carbohydrate derivatives for BNCT has received special attention because of the sugar-preferential uptake by tumor cells [3]. Tumor cells perform glycolysis at a faster rate than their noncancerous tissue counterparts, so increasing the glucose consumption with respect to healthy cells. Galactose and fructose also allow tumor growth in the absence of glucose.

Boronic acid derivatives have gained interest in the last years in different fields such as the development of enzyme inhibitors, drug delivery polymers, saccharide sensors and as boron carriers for BNCT, e.g., amino acid derivatives or DNA ligands [4,5].

In the frame of a more general research program, we have recently published the synthesis of boronic acids derivatives of monosaccharides in which one of the sugar hydroxy groups is substituted by a boronic acid moiety [6]. A related approach has been described [7] recently, where, among other derivatives, 1,2-dideoxy-ᴅ-glucopyranos-2-ylboronic acid has been synthesized through a regio- and stereoselective hydroboration of persilylated glucal.

Considering the different substitution positions for the boronic acid in the sugar skeleton, we were curious to observe the chemical and biological behavior of novel derivatives containing this functional group at the anomeric position, giving rise to an isostere analogue able to mimic the monosaccharide (see Figure 1).

[1860-5397-15-135-1]

Figure 1: Structure of boronic acid analogues (for clarity, sugar numbering has been conserved into the analogues).

Results and Discussion

In the present paper the synthesis of two analogues bearing a boron atom at the anomeric position is reported. These model compounds, never described before in literature, allowed to perform a preliminary biological evaluation as well as an evaluation of their stability.

The compatibility of boronic acids/esters in the presence of other functional groups has been reviewed [8]. Usually, β-alkoxyboronates are reasonably stable with some exceptions [9], while β-hydroxyboronic acids are prone to elimination. However, β-hydroxyboronic acids are described, such as in the case of the previously mentioned glucopyranos-2-ylboronic acid [7] as well as in other reports where they are usually isolated after conversion into trifluoroborates [10].

In principle, the best way to obtain anomeric boron analogues mimicking hexoses would be the addition of a nucleophilic boron reagent on a properly protected pentose. Actually, boryllithium and magnesium reagents [11-14] have been described but, after a careful evaluation, we discarded this approach considering the scarce information on the general applicability of these reagents and for the manipulations required after the addition to get the desired boronic acid.

Therefore, we decided to explore the synthesis of two simplified compounds, namely the 2-deoxy and the 2,3-dideoxy derivatives, whose structures are reported in Figure 2, in order to have a reliable synthesis and to get preliminary information on their stability.

[1860-5397-15-135-2]

Figure 2: Structures of boron analogues.

We planned a strategy based on a hydroboration reaction of terminal, suitably functionalized alkenes, which can be obtained from properly protected sugar precursors (Figure 3).

[1860-5397-15-135-3]

Figure 3: Synthetic strategy.

The synthesis of the first analogue 8, shown in Scheme 1, started from known compound 1, that is easily obtained from 2,3,5-tri-O-benzyl-ᴅ-arabinose according to a literature procedure [15]. Benzoylation of the free hydroxy group of 1, followed by removal of the silyl protecting group gave the intermediate 3 in good yield. Standard substitution of the hydroxy group gave the 1-deoxy-1-iododerivative 4. Base-promoted dehydroiodination, followed by Zémplen removal of the benzoate gave the desired enol ether 6, which was selected as precursor for the preparation of the first anomeric boron analogue.

[1860-5397-15-135-i1]

Scheme 1: Synthesis of 2-deoxy analogue 8.

Different conditions and reagents were tested for the hydroboration of the enol ethers 5 and 6 (including the use of catecholborane or dibromoborane at low temperature), but complex mixtures containing elimination byproducts were obtained in any condition. We were able to obtain the desired product 7 by the simple treatment of 6 with an excess of borane-THF complex (5 molar equiv) followed by quenching with water, while in the same conditions compound 5 again gave extensive decomposition. These conditions allowed the isolation of the cyclic anomeric boron analogue 7 in moderate yield. Unfortunately, we isolated as main side product the known elimination compound 7a [16], which further confirms the strong tendency of β-alkoxyboronic acids to give rise to elimination.

The stereochemistry of the newly formed stereocenter was inferred from the coupling constant between H-3 and H-4 (sugar numbering). In fact, the measured J3,4 value was 1.8 Hz, which is only compatible with a ribo configuration of the compound 7 [17]. Moreover, the coupling constants of 4.6 and 5.7 Hz of H-3 with the protons at C-2 further confirm the assigned C-3 configuration. We were unable to isolate the arabino-configurated epimer from the reaction mixture, which, if present, may therefore be formed in a very small amount. As expected, no regioisomer was detected, due to the contribution of both steric and electronic effects on the hydroboration at C-1 [7].

In order to explain the stereoselectivity in the hydroboration reaction we hypothesized the transition states bearing to the two epimers. We assumed that borane would react firstly with the free hydroxy group generating an intermediate alkoxyborane, and that the hydroboration reaction occurs intramolecularly on such intermediate. Based on these premises, two transition states can be identified (Figure 4) for the hydroboration reaction on each of the two diastereotopic faces of the double bond. The transition state deriving from the attack on the si face, which leads to the arabino-configurated product, contains two destabilizing pseudoaxial substituents. The alternative, a more stable transition state formed from the re-face attack would bear to the actually obtained 3S configurated boronic acid analogue 7.

[1860-5397-15-135-4]

Figure 4: Postulated transition states for the hydroboration reaction.

The final deprotection of compound 7 by conventional catalytic hydrogenolysis gave the final compound 8 in almost quantitative yield. Again, the final product proved to be unstable towards elimination giving rise slowly to the corresponding alkene 8a [18]. In fact, when compound 8 was kept in water or methanol solution at room temperature, the formation of 8a was observed in about 20% within a few hours. Moreover, the same elimination occurs even when 8 was stored at −20 °C.

To avoid β-elimination we planned the synthesis of a new final sugar devoid of the hydroxy group at position 3. Therefore, we selected the alkene 9 as substrate for the hydroboration reaction (Scheme 2).

[1860-5397-15-135-i2]

Scheme 2: Synthesis of 2,3-dideoxy analogue 11.

The hydroboration reaction of the known compound 9 [19], again with 5 equiv of reagent, afforded the cyclic boronic acid 10 in a fair yield. Benzylidene group hydrogenolysis gave the deprotected pure cyclic boronic acid 11 in quantitative yield and compound 11 proved to be stable for months. In this case the elimination reaction was not observed as expected for a 3-deoxy derivative. Moreover, compound 11 also proved to be stable towards oxidation of the C–B bond which could occur on boronic acids.

Inspection of the NMR spectra can give some information on the conformation of cyclic boronic acids. Considering that the boron atom should be sp2 hybridized it is not possible to assign any α/β configuration to the position 1 of the sugar analogue. Compound 7 showed the following coupling constants: J2a,3 = 4.6 Hz, J2b,3 = 5.7 Hz, J3,4 = 1.8 Hz and J4,5 = 7.2 Hz. From these values, a chair-like conformation could be inferred, with some flattening around the boron atom. Compound 8 shows two isochronal protons at C-2 with a J2,3 = 4.9 Hz, and superposition of protons H-3 and H-5 not allowing to hypothesize a clear picture of the 6-membered ring conformation. Concerning compound 10, the molecule is rigid around the benzylidene ring, while a broadening of the H-2, H-3 and H-4 signals suggest a slow equilibrium between different conformations. After deprotection of the benzylidene group in addition to line broadening, signal superposition is observed, hampering any conclusion on the conformation of compound 11.

In order to get more information about the solution behavior of these compounds we performed MS analysis. The mass spectrum of compound 8 in aqueous solution showed the presence of the cyclic boronic ester both in the positive ionization mode, as adduct at m/z 180 ([M + NH4]+) and m/z 185 ([M + Na]+), and in the negative ionization mode, as m/z 161 ([M − H]). In the same positive spectrum the presence of a pseudomolecular ion at m/z 119 revealed the presence of the elimination product 8a as [M + H]+ (C5H10O3) confirming the instability of the β-hydroxyboronic ester. On the other hand, the positive mass spectrum of compound 11 did not reveal the presence of any elimination product, while the negative mass spectrum showed only the pseudomolecular ion at m/z 145 corresponding to the [M − H].

The toxicity of compounds 8 and 11, compared to commercial BPA, on cell viability, was evaluated on human primary fibroblasts. The cells were treated (24–72 h) with increasing concentrations (1–100 μM) of each compound, and cell viability measured by MTT assay. No toxicity was measured at all concentrations and times considered (see Supporting Information File 1), indicating that all compounds under evaluation are biocompatible and suitable for future biological tests.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have reported the synthesis, stability evaluation, and preliminary biological testing of two sugar analogues bearing a boron atom at the anomeric position. Compound 8 showed a tendency towards elimination reaction, probably through boronic ester ring opening, while compound 11 demonstrated to be stable. The two compounds showed no toxicity on human primary fibroblasts. Further studies will be conducted to determine the cellular uptake of compounds 8 and 11.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Experimental procedures and analytical data. Copies of NMR spectra of all new compounds, mass analysis of compounds 8 and 8a and toxicity data.
Format: PDF Size: 5.5 MB Download

Acknowledgements

We gratefully thank Compagnia di San Paolo (GLYCOBNCT project - CUP: C61J12000280007) for financial support.

References

  1. Moss, R. L. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2014, 88, 2–11. doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.11.109
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Ichikawa, H.; Taniguchi, E.; Fujimoto, T.; Fukumori, Y. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2009, 67, S111–S114. doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.03.026
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Marepally, S. R.; Yao, M.-L.; Kabalka, G. W. Future Med. Chem. 2013, 5, 693–704. doi:10.4155/fmc.13.39
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Baker, S. J.; Tomsho, J. W.; Benkovic, S. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 4279–4285. doi:10.1039/c0cs00131g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Brooks, W. L. A.; Sumerlin, B. S. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 1375–1397. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00300
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Imperio, D.; Del Grosso, E.; Fallarini, S.; Lombardi, G.; Panza, L. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 1678–1681. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00382
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Itoh, T.; Tamura, K.; Ueda, H.; Tanaka, T.; Sato, K.; Kuroda, R.; Aoki, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2018, 26, 5922–5933. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2018.10.041
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  8. Matteson, D. S. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 581, 51–65. doi:10.1016/s0022-328x(99)00064-9
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Matteson, D. S.; Peterson, M. L. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 5116–5121. doi:10.1021/jo00232a011
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Olsson, V. J.; Sebelius, S.; Selander, N.; Szabó, K. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4588–4589. doi:10.1021/ja060468n
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Segawa, Y.; Suzuki, Y.; Yamashita, M.; Nozaki, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16069–16079. doi:10.1021/ja8057919
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Gulyás, H.; Bonet, A.; Pubill-Ulldemolins, C.; Solé, C.; Cid, J.; Fernández, E. Pure Appl. Chem. 2012, 84, 2219–2231. doi:10.1351/pac-con-11-10-06
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Cid, J.; Gulyás, H.; Carbó, J. J.; Fernández, E. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3558–3570. doi:10.1039/c2cs15291f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Segawa, Y.; Yamashita, M.; Nozaki, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6710–6713. doi:10.1002/anie.200702369
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. van Straten, N. C. R.; van der Marel, G. A.; van Boom, J. H. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 6523–6538. doi:10.1016/s0040-4020(97)00308-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Bravo, F.; Castillón, S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 507–516. doi:10.1002/1099-0690(200102)2001:3<507::aid-ejoc507>3.0.co;2-r
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Schmidt, R. R.; Frische, K. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1988, 209–214. doi:10.1002/jlac.198819880305
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Jäger, V.; Schröter, D.; Koppenhoefer, B. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 2195–2210. doi:10.1016/s0040-4020(01)96130-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Paquette, L. A.; Zeng, Q.; Tsui, H.-C.; Johnston, J. N. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8491–8509. doi:10.1021/jo981749j
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2019 Imperio et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular requires that the authors and source are credited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

 
Back to Article List

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities

Keep Informed

RSS Feed

Subscribe to our Latest Articles RSS Feed.

Subscribe

Follow the Beilstein-Institut

LinkedIn

Twitter: @BeilsteinInst