1,2,3-Triazolium macrocycles in supramolecular chemistry

  1. ORCID Logo ,
  2. and
  3. ORCID Logo
Molecular Design and Synthesis, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
  1. Corresponding author email
Guest Editor: W. Jiang
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019, 15, 2142–2155. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.15.211
Received 12 Jun 2019, Accepted 23 Aug 2019, Published 12 Sep 2019
cc by logo


In this short review, we describe different pathways for synthesizing 1,2,3-triazolium macrocycles and focus on their application in different areas of supramolecular chemistry. The synthesis is mostly relying on the well-known “click reaction” (CuAAC) leading to 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles that then can be quaternized. Applications of triazolium macrocycles thus prepared include receptors for molecular recognition of anionic species, pH sensors, mechanically interlocked molecules, molecular machines, and molecular reactors.


1. Introduction

Supramolecular chemistry – “The chemistry beyond the molecule” [1] – is an ever growing interdisciplinary area has emerged from the early host–guest chemistry to more elaborate bio-inspired supramolecular aggregates by exploiting various noncovalent interactions such as hydrogen bonding, π–π stacking, electrostatic interactions, van der Waals forces, hydrophobic/solvatophobic effects and coordination bonds [2,3]. Advances in supramolecules from molecular to macroscopic size with pre-structured or functionalized receptors and multivalent binding positions have led to applications in molecular recognition, sensing, molecular machines and devices, supramolecular polymers, stimuli-responsive materials, supramolecular catalysis and drug-delivery systems [4-7].

Inspired by the attractive role of various N-heterocyclic building blocks such as imidazoles [8,9], polypyrroles [10,11], and indole moieties [12,13], as part of supramolecular receptors, triazole heterocycles containing macrocycles have recently been introduced as new host molecules for the selective recognition of ions, mechanically interlocked molecules (MIMs), supramolecular polymers etc. [14,15]. Noncovalent interactions play a dynamic role in the binding mechanism of triazoles as macrocyclic receptors. It has been reported that the combined effects of both an electron lone pair on the nitrogen of the heterocycle and the acidic C5–H proton make 1,2,3-triazoles interesting candidates for amide bond surrogates. Interestingly, 1,2,3-triazole units can act as sensors for both anions and cations via different binding mechanisms [16,17]. The heterocyclic ring N2 and N3 atoms could realize the selective recognition of the cations whereas the C5–H···anions electrostatic interaction results in the sensing of anions. In fact, strictly speaking this interaction is not a hydrogen bonding interaction seen as there is no X···H–Y unit (X, Y = O, N, F) but these interactions are often referred to as such in the literature.

The anion binding can be enhanced by the alkylation of 1,2,3-triazole units to more electrophilic 1,2,3-triazolium units by influencing both hydrogen bonding-like and anion–π interactions. Moreover, halogen bond (XB) and chalcogen bond (ChB) interactions (see Figure 1) also been applied for the selective detection of anions by exchanging C5–H protons with halogens (iodine, bromine) and chalcogens (selenium and tellurium) [18].


Figure 1: Hydrogen, halogen or chalcogen bonding to anions within a bistriazolium macrocycle.

While there are several strategies for the synthesis of triazoles, the Cu(II)-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition reaction (CuAAC click reaction) is considered as one of the most efficient, simple and mild approaches towards the preparation of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3- triazole units [19-24]. Macrocyclic ring closure can be achieved by the CuAAC of building blocks functionalized with both azide and alkyne, using [1 + 1], [2 + 2], [n + n] strategies depending on how much triazoles are needed to be included in the macroring. A second strategy is the macrocyclization of an acyclic precursor containing pre-functionalized triazole by other ring closure methods such as Grubbs metathesis [25] and amidation reactions. The macrocyclization is normally followed by N-alkylation (often methylation) leading to the synthesis of highly functionalized 1,2,3-triazolium macrocycles under optimized reaction conditions, although cyclizations also have been carried out starting from triazolium building blocks (Figure 2). Using a small variation in the reaction protocols of the click reaction, iodine atoms can be introduced at the 5-position of the triazoles (triazolium), and nucleophilic substitution of halogen can be used to introduce chalcogens (Se, Te). Thus, the corresponding triazolium macrocycles can take advantage respectively of halogen and chalcogen bonding as part of the molecular recognition (vide infra).


Figure 2: Main synthetic strategies towards macrocyclic triazoliums.

In this review, we highlight the recent advances in the synthesis and applications of triazolium macrocycles as anion sensors, molecular reactors, and pH sensors through the description of selected examples. The macrocycles involved vary from having relatively simple structures to being part of different types of mechanically interlocked molecules and molecular machines. We will not concern ourselves in this review with the applications of metal complexes based on N-heterocyclic carbene coordination chemistry, derived of triazoliums or with applications as ionic liquids [26-28].

2. Anion recognition

Due to the critical role of negatively charged species in numerous biological, environmental, chemical and medicinal processes, anion receptors and transporters play an important role in supramolecular chemistry [17,29].

Thus, diverse anion receptors based on 1,2,3-triazolium recognition elements have been reported in the literature in which they bind to the anionic species by utilizing multiple noncovalent interactions based on electrostatics, including hydrogen bonding (HB), anion–π interactions [30], and on Lewis acidity/basicity [31].

2.1. Bile acid-based 1,2,3-triazolium macrocycles

Bile acid-based macrocycles are a class of steroid-based receptors which can host polar molecules in nonpolar solvents because of their amphiphilic nature. As a result, their design and synthesis has been a topic of substantial research interest in supramolecular chemistry [32,33].

Various synthetic methods have been developed for the synthesis of bile acid-based macrocycles, using macrolactamization, ring-closing metathesis and Ugi-multicomponent macrocyclization. Developing more efficacious and economical methods for the construction of these macrocycles is still in demand due to the disadvantages of the aforementioned methods such as low yield of cyclization, long synthesis, and sometimes, usage of costly precursors [34,35].

Pandey et al. have synthesized two new bile acid-based macrocycles containing two 1,2,3-triazolium moieties (1a and 1b) and studied their anion bonding properties by 1H NMR spectral changes in the CDCl3 solution of anionic species (Figure 3). The receptor 1a has shown remarkable affinity toward fluoride ion with an association constant of 560 M−1 followed by Cl > Br > I > CH3COO with the affinity range of 5.6 × 102 to 6.0 × 101 M−1 but no binding was observed with the H2PO4 ion. On the other hand, the observed affinity trend of receptor 1b towards anions is H2PO4 (1.1 × 103 M−1) > Cl (6.90 × 102 M−1) > Br (4.5 × 102 M−1) > F (3.7 × 102 M−1) > I (2.0 × 102 M−1) > CH3CO2 (2.5 × 101 M−1) in which the affinity of the receptor 1b towards H2PO4 could be attributed to the larger size of the receptor cavity due to the para-substituted benzene ring. Interestingly, the corresponding acyclic receptor 1c has showed a higher affinity toward the H2PO4 ion (1.9 × 103 M−1) compared to the cyclic ones because of the high flexibility of the acyclic receptor for accommodating the bulky anion. The observed selectivity trend of 1c was H2PO4 > Cl > F > Br > I > CH3COO with the dissociation constants 1.9 × 103, 3.9 × 102, 3.6 × 102, 2.0 × 102, 1.0 × 102 and 3.0 × 101 M−1, respectively [36].


Figure 3: Chemical structure of compound 1 (1a, 1b and 1c) and 2.

Conversely, another bile acid-based macrocycle 2 which was synthesized by the same group has demonstrated a very high selectivity toward the chloride anion (Ka = 3.7 × 103 M−1) followed by HSO4 > H2PO4 > F > Br > CH3COO > I with the dissociation constants of 8.0 × 102, 6.5 × 102, 4.0 × 102, 9.0 × 101, 6.0 × 101 and 5.0 × 101 M−1, respectively, in CDCl3 at 298 K. The significant selectivity of this receptor for chloride anion is due to the cavity size (see Figure 3) [37].

2.2. Optical anion sensing by 1,2,3-triazolium macrocycles within porphyrin cages

Various porphyrin-based host supramolecules containing hydrogen-bond donor groups such as integrated amide, urea, pyrrole, ammonium and imidazolium which can recognize different anions, have been reported in the literature. As a matter of fact, porphyrin macrocycles are used for sensing of anionic compounds by a measurable physical response due to their intrinsic optical and redox properties [38].

Beer and co-workers have synthesized the novel tetra-1,2,3-triazolium zinc porphyrin cage 3 (Figure 4) and have probed its characteristics by using UV–visible spectroscopy, determining the association constants for complex formation in 5% water/acetone. This receptor has shown affinity toward all of the halide ions and especially oxoanions with the strongest binding for sulfate dianion [39]. The observed affinity trend for this receptor was SO42− (5.2 × 105 M−1) > AcO (1.3 × 105 M−1) > H2PO4 (1.2 × 105 M−1) > F (8.7 × 103 M−1) > Cl (7.4 × 103 M−1) > Br (<5.0 × 101 M−1) ≈ I (<5.0 × 101 M−1). These authors have also studied the association constant of macrocycle 3 in the more competitive 15% water/acetone medium, still demonstrating a high binding affinity for sulfate anion (Ka = 2.5 × 105 M−1) while the cage 3 did not show any binding toward the other tested anions in the more aqueous solvent mixture.


Figure 4: Chemical structure of compound 3 and 4.

2.3. Redox-active 1,2,3-triazolium receptors

A ferrocene-containing dicationic bis-triazolium macrocycle 4 (see Figure 4) has been designed and synthesized by utilising the intramolecular Eglinton cyclisation of an acyclic bis(triazolylalkyne)ferrocene precursor followed by alkylation. The anion sensing ability was investigated by 1H NMR titration experiments in CD3CN solution and cyclic voltammetry in 0.1 M TBA·PF6 (TBA = tetrabutylammonium) in CH3CN (Figure 3). WinEQNMR2 analysis of the titration data has revealed that among the tested anions, the receptor 4 binds strongly with chloride and benzoate ions through favorable charge-assisted C–H···anion interactions. According to the cyclic voltammetry analysis, the redox-active macrocycle was able to recognize chloride, causing a cathodic shift of the Epa wave of the ferrocene/ferrocenium redox couple. However, a quick disappearance of the redox signal was observed when the analogous experiment was done with benzoate, due to the precipitation of an insoluble ferrocenium complex [40].

2.4. Mechanically interlocked catenanes containing 1,2,3-triazolium macrocycles

Mechanically interlocked molecules like rotaxane and catenane have attracted much attention in the field of nanoscale molecular machines and switches [41] and their importance has been recognized by the 2016 Nobel prize. Anion recognition can be used as an impediment for rotary movement in the rotaxane structure. Besides, catenanes possessing a mechanically interlocked ring, have attracted considerable attention as components of functional molecular devices, such as switches [42,43], unidirectional motors [44], electronic displays [45] as well as in anion recognition [46].

Interestingly, Beer et al. have attempted the synthesis of tetratriazolium hetero-catenane, but the purification and isolation was felt to be very difficult to further proceed. However, the anion binding property of the corresponding bistriazolium macrocyclic part 5·(BF4)2 (Figure 5) has successfully been investigated using 1H NMR titration experiments in CD3CN. The highest binding affinity was found to be almost similar for both BzO and Cl (4.7 × 102 and 4.6 × 102 M−1, respectively) then followed by Br (2.1 × 102 M−1), N3 (1.9 × 102 M−1) and I (1.3 × 101 M−1) [47].


Figure 5: Chemical structure of compound 5.

Soon after, a mixed halogen and hydrogen bonding hetero[2]catenane 6 (Figure 6) was successfully synthesized by the same group via an anion templated Grubbs’ II-catalyzed RCM clipping mechanical bond forming methodology [48]. The 1H NMR spectroscopy in CDCl3 (293 K, 500 MHz) and the fluorescence titration experiments which were done in acetonitrile have demonstrated that the synthesized 1,2,3-triazolium macrocycle 6 was able to bind and sense several anions but the highest affinity of this receptor was for acetate (Ka = 1.5 × 105 M−1) and dihydrogen phosphate (Ka = 4.5 × 104 M−1).


Figure 6: Chemical structure of compound 6.

Because of the excellent properties of perylene diimide (PDI) as a chromophore, fluorophore, or redox center, this unit has become increasingly popular in the construction of supramolecular materials. Interestingly, a dynamic [3]catenane 7 (Figure 7) consisting of a large four station central PDI macrocycle with two triazolium motifs and two smaller isophthalimide containing macrocycle has been designed and synthesized by Beer’s group [49]. An anion induced circumrotatory motion of the smaller rings from the core tetrachloro substituted PDI motifs containing triazolium groups has been utilized for the selective colorimetric and fluorescence anion sensing in competitive protic organic and aqueous-organic solvent media. By addition of tetrabutylammonium (TBA) chloride to a solution of 7 in CHCl3/CH3OH (3:1, v/v), a remarkable naked-eye recognizable color change from red to orange was observed. According to fluorescence spectroscopy, the emission intensity of PDI increased considerably (quantum yield enhancement factor of 57%). Anions are recognizable by catenane 7 at low concentration (10−5 mol/L) in a competitive aqueous–organic CHCl3/CH3OH/H2O mixture (45:45:10, v/v/v). Fluorescence spectroscopy measurements supported by molecular dynamics simulation data have revealed that the smaller macrocyclic rings move from the core-substituted PDI motif to the two 1,2,3-triazolium groups due to the anion binding, including chloride and other oxoanion salts. They also proved that the anions binding strength falls in line with their basicity as seen in the series AcO > H2PO4 > Cl > SO42− >NO3.


Figure 7: Chemical structure of compound 7.

2.5. 1,2,3-Triazolium macrocycles and [2]rotaxanes

Supramolecular interactions could happen between Lewis bases and electron-defective heavy chalcogen atoms containing Lewis acidic s-holes which is known under the term chalcogen bonding (ChB) [18].

A mechanically interlocked rotaxane 8 (Figure 8) has been prepared by Beer and co-workers utilizing the 5-(methylchalcogeno)-1,2,3-triazole (chalcogen = Se, Te) motif as a novel ChB donor for anion binding. By exploiting the possibility of the chalcogen atoms to orient within the macrocycle cavity to chelate the copper(I) endotopically, the first examples of mechanically interlocked [2]rotaxanes containing ChB donor groups has been prepared via an active metal template strategy. The 1H NMR binding data of 8·Se were studied in organic and aqueous solvent mixtures, revealing that ChB–anion binding affinity can compete with and even outperform hydrogen bonding receptor analogues. Due to the larger degree of covalency with the heavier halides, charge-assisted ChB-mediated anion binding prefers larger halides as in the series I > Br > Cl. However, this chalcogen bonding 1,2,3-triazolium macrocycle was not able to host larger anions such as oxoanions due to the smaller size of the cavity [50]. In addition, they have also shown considerable differences in anion recognition behavior of 8·Se in comparison with chalcogen-free host analogues 8·HB demonstrating that the 8·HB rotaxane can host all of the tested anions within the interlocked cavity. Regarding this, it can be concluded that the bulky methylselenium subunits of rotaxane 8·Se creates steric restriction for bigger anionic species such as sulfate and acetate and leads their binding to the outside of the cavity.


Figure 8: Chemical structure of compound 8.

2.6. Multi-1,2,3-triazolium macrocycles

As a matter of fact, a cyclic host framework incorporating multiple charged moieties may create a potent anion receptor that functions in aqueous/organic solvent mixtures [51].

A tetra-1,2,3-triazolium macrocycle 9 (Figure 9) was reported in 2012 by the Beer group. The synthesis was realized by using a CuAAC cyclisation of triazole bisazides and bisalkynes and subsequent alkylation. The charge-assisted C–H···anion interaction is used by this receptor for binding strongly to the anionic species. Among all of the tested negatively-charged ions such as halides and oxoanions, receptor 9 recognizes iodide and bromide stronger than chloride, fluoride, acetate and sulfate in a 9:1 DMSO-d6/D2O solvent mixture. The highest displayed binding affinity by receptor 9 was towards sulfate dianion (Ka = >104 M−1) out of all the tested anions found the trend was I > Br > Cl > F > OAc with the dissociation constants of 4.6 × 102, 3.9 × 102, 2.3 × 102, 2.3 × 102 and 1.5 × 102 M−1, respectively. By carrying out extensive molecular modelling analysis which gives information about solution anion binding trends, the authors found that the cavity size of macrocycle, solvent effects and strength of electrostatic interactions notably affect the observed anion recognition processes [52].


Figure 9: Chemical structures of compound 9.

2.6.1. 1,2,3-Triazolium macrocycles with additional H-bond donors: The benefits of combining the triazolium motif with other hydrogen bond donor motifs has been explored by Sessler et al. and they have synthesized a pyrrole based tetra-1,2,3-triazolium macrocycle 10 (Figure 10) via the tetraalkylation of a triazole macrocycle originally prepared via click chemistry. Different hydrogen bond donors such as pyrrole N–H and benzene C–H along with the triazolium C5–H have been successfully incorporated within a single macrocyclic framework. The complex formation of anions with the hydrogen bond donors varied according to the polarity of the solvent. It was found that the binding constants for interaction with monoanions become smaller as the polarity of the solvent medium increases on moving from acetonitrile to methanol. Among all of the tested anions, macrocycle 10 has shown a high selectivity for pyrophosphate HP2O73−, and tetrahedral oxyanions HSO4, H2PO4 relative to various tested monoanions and trigonally planar anions in mixed polar organic–aqueous solvent media. Both experimental and theoretical results support the counterintuitive conclusion that triazolium (CH)+–anion interactions are less important in an energetic sense than neutral aromatic CH–anion interactions in polar solvents. An important implication for receptor design has been revealed by combining various hydrogen bond donor motifs, particularly systems designed to recognize anions in highly polar organic media or aqueous environments by considering of different solvent dependence of the fundamental hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions related to the individual recognition motifs [53].


Figure 10: Chemical structures of compound 10, 11 and 12.

Another cyclophane macrocycle containing two 1,2,3-triazolium moieties was synthesized by Alcalde and co-workers in a moderate yield [54]. The anion-binding behavior of receptor 11 (Figure 10) was examined with chloride, acetate, cyanide and dihydrogenphosphate anions by 1H NMR titrations in CD3CN, DMSO-d6 or CDCl3 using the corresponding salts. The titrations of triazolium macrocycle 11 with acetate showed that the bis(imidazolium) receptor 11 underwent a de-shielding of its C(5)–H heteroaromatic proton (Δδ H(c) ≈ 2 ppm) in CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 solvent. The Job’s plot analysis of titration of 11, in CD3CN, revealed a 1:1 receptor to anion binding stoichiometry. It has also been proven that the presence of the 1,2,3-triazolium unit decreases the anion recognition ability in CD3CN in comparison with its bis(imidazolium) analogue. Given that, the highest affinity of this heterophane system was toward acetate (Ka = 5.0 × 103 M−1) in CD3CN.

Although the iodide ion is biologically important because of its indispensable role in thyroid gland function, among all of the reported receptors in the literature there are still challenges to find selective iodide receptors due to its low basicity, large size and low charge density. There is an expectation that the combination of strong hydrogen-bonding sites and a large cavity could cause strong complexation with larger halide ions [55]. In 2016 a macrocycle has been reported by Nakamura and his co-workers containing three 1,2,3-triazolium and carbazole moieties 12 (Figure 10). π–π stacking interactions and the self-association ability of the synthesized macrocycle are increased in comparison with its neutral analogue due to the decreased electron density of the triazolium derivative. Rigid macrocycles 12 display selective complexation with I because of the complementary size of the cavity of the macrocyclic ring and the iodide ion. In addition, the acidity of the inner protons of 12 is higher than the corresponding neutral analogue which also helped to increase the ability of complexation of 12 with iodide [56].

2.7. Functional molecular crystal and materials

Combining anion–arene interactions and controlling the electron-transfer or charge-transfer process concerning an anionic guest by using a cyclophane is uncommon [57] but can be realized by inserting a photoactive binding motif into a cyclophane [58]. In this regard, Li et al. have synthesized a cationic cyclophane 13 (Figure 11) based on an electron poor naphthalenediimide (NDI) moiety and cationic 1,2,3-triazolium units. Cyclophane 13 was employed to control the interactions between anions and the NDI motif [59]. NDI was chosen due to its excellent photochemical and electrochemical properties. In addition, the electron deficiency and aromatic nature of NDI is important for anion–π interactions [60] to control the charge-transfer properties.


Figure 11: Chemical structure of compound 13.

It also has been observed that in the solid state the movement of the molecules is restricted because of charge-transfer complexes between NDI and Cl, Br or I. Because macrocycle 13 precipitated in less polar organic solvents upon addition of halides, the binding affinities were studied in DMSO in which the binding constants for Cl, Br and I were found as 4.4 × 101 M−1, 1.7 × 101 M−1, 8.5 M−1, respectively. Thus, the interaction of 1,2,3-triazolium CH is decreasing with increasing halide size. Besides, the complexes of halides with the macrocycles were shown to have visible charge-transfer absorptions in the molecular crystals. Thus, these complexes could be useful for designing functional molecular crystals and materials which can be applied for the study of photoinduced electron transfer and energy conversion towards application in the field of molecular electronics.

3. Molecular reactors

Designing synthetic host systems capable of binding to specifically targeted substrates by imitating various chemical processes is one of the most substantial objectives in chemistry. Encapsulation of two or more substrates within the inner space of the host speeds up and controls the reaction because of a significant increase of the effective molarity and the favorable orientation of the substrates inside the cavity [61].

Thus, a nanometer-sized macrocyclic receptor based on a photoactive porphyrin unit and anion-binding pyridinium and 1,2,3-triazolium units 15 was reported by Li and co-workers This receptor was synthesized via well-known “click chemistry”, followed by triple quaternization of two triazoles and one pyridine unit (Figure 12) [62]. This macrocycle (in its hexafluorophosphate form) binds three equivalents of acetate anions in acetonitrile solvent, according to the Job plot based on UV spectra at 365 nm.


Figure 12: Chemical structure of compound 15 including the sigma-connected TCNQ dimer.

More interestingly, based on the results and control studies, Li’s group have proposed the ability of macrocycle 15 (triiodide form) to act as a nanoreactor by the photo-driven dimerization of tetracyano-para-quinodimethane (TCNQ). The proposed mechanism consists of 7 steps:

  1. the formation of a 1:1 host–guest [15·TCNQ]2+ complex by pre-reduction to a [TCNQ]−· anion radical in situ, and encapsulation in the host,
  2. photochemical excitation of the porphyrin unit in the reactor,
  3. photoinduced electron transfer from the excited porphyrin unit to a neutral TCNQ, giving rise to a porphyrin radical cation and a second [TCNQ]−· radical anion,
  4. dragging the second [TCNQ] near to the cavity by the help of the electrostatic stabilization supplied by the 1,2,3-triazolium cations,
  5. coupling of the two [TCNQ]−· anion radicals in the cavity and rapid formation of the sigma-connected dimer,
  6. reduction of the photogenerated porphyrin cation by the iodide counterions of the triazolium macrocycle, either before or after the constraining of the second [TCNQ]−· anion radical,
  7. finally, the dimer is either ejected from the host or is displaced by the [TCNQ]−· anion radical.

It was clearly shown that the macrocycle 15 acts as a nanoreactor because there is an acceleration of the dimerization by two orders of magnitude and the turnover of the catalyst was demonstrated.

The synthesis of cyclic carbonates from epoxides and CO2 is an efficient method for CO2 fixation. The development of an effective chiral catalyst for the efficient kinetic resolution of epoxides with CO2 remains a big challenge. Recently, Ema and co-workers described a chiral binaphthyl strapped Zn(II) porphyrin with triazolium halide units as a bifunctional catalyst for the kinetic resolution of epoxides with CO2 [63].

The condensation of click-reaction-derived triazole containing dialdehyde and binaphthyl with dipyrromethene, followed by zinc metalation and subsequent reaction with MeI resulted in the synthesis of the two-component catalytic system 16 (Figure 13). Here, the cooperative effect of nucleophilic triazolium moieties, their counter ion near the binaphthyl system and the Lewis acidic metal center facilitated the enantioselective synthesis of cyclic carbonates from epoxides. Various catalyst was screened by changing the linker length (n = 4 to 8) and nucleophilic counter anion (X = I, Cl, Br), and 16c was found to be the best catalyst for the reaction with the highest enantioselectivity. The importance of the bifunctional system for the catalytic activity and enantioselectivity was demonstrated by performing a series of reactions with lower activity and selectivity, utilizing free-base porphyrin 16h with triazolium moieties and the two component catalytic system composed of 16c before methylation and TBAI as reference catalysts. Optimization studies of the reaction conditions showed that the addition of CHCl3 and lowering of the reaction temperature (to 10 °C) considerably increased the enantioselectivity (s value of 4.1). An evaluation of the substrate scope showed that various epoxides reacted under the optimized conditions to yield optically active cyclic carbonates and epoxides [63].


Figure 13: Chemical structure of compound 16 for the kinetic resolution of epoxides.

4. pH sensitive 1,2,3-triazolium macrocycles

Various macrocycles show remarkable response to the pH of the environment. In the following section, we will focus on describing the behavior of three different 1,2,3-triazolium macrocycles including 1,2,3-triazolium catenanes, containing dinaphtho-24-crown-8 (DN24C8) and naphthalenediimide (NDI) moieties at different pH values.

4.1. pH sensors based on 1,2,3-triazolium macrocycles

Different methods have been recently reported in the literature for the preparation of bistable catenanes and the incorporation of these molecules into an integrated functional supramolecular system. Li et al. have prepared a new catenane 17 (Figure 14) by utilizing a one-step hydrogen-bond and π-donor/π-acceptor template-directed self-assembly procedure via an intramolecular “CuAAC click” reaction in the presence of electron-rich bisnaphtho- or bisbenzo-24-crown-8 ethers. Afterwards, the triazole groups in the catenanes were methylated. The resulting triazolium macrocycle containing catenanes 17a (DN24C8) and 17b (DB24C8) are capable of a reversible pH-controlled movement of the crown ether between two stations. UV–vis absorption spectroscopy experiments and 1H NMR spectroscopy have shown that the electron-rich crown ether rings and the electron-deficient N-methyl-1,2,3-triazolium can interact with each other strongly [64].


Figure 14: Chemical structure of compound 17a (bisnaphtho crown ether shown).

Upon addition of diisopropylethylamine (DIEA) to the solution of [2]catenane 17a, the color of the solution changed from colorless to slightly yellow due to the strong charge transfer between the naphthalene ring of dinaphtho-24-crown-8 (DN24C8) and the naphthalenediimide (NDI) unit, indicating that the DN24C8 unit moved toward the N-methyl-1,2,3-triazolium station and was now close to the NDI moiety. This pH-controlled switching process is reversible (e.g., after addition of trifluoroacetic acid the original state is regained). On the other hand, there were no considerable changes in the 1H NMR spectra or color changes, upon addition of DIEA to the corresponding triazole analogue (precursor to 17a) because of only weak interaction between the crown ether and the triazole unit. This clearly proves the importance of the triazolium moiety for the switching process. Color changes with catenane 17b upon addition of base were less noticeable because of a weaker CT band in the case of a dibenzo-fused crown ether.

Thus, the authors have proven that the movement of macrocyclic rings within catenanes can be controlled by switching the pH, and the bisnaphtho crown ethers can act either as efficient hydrogen-bond acceptors for the secondary dialkylammonium (in acid circumstances) or as binding units for NDI by the π-donor/π-acceptor interaction, which is signalled by a color change.

4.2. pH-sensitive double-lasso molecular machine

The synthesis of various rotaxane molecular machines and molecular muscles has recently been reported. Adaptable interlocked double-lasso structures containing 1,2,3-triazolium moieties could be of interest as novel molecular drug carriers capable to release their cargo at a specific pH [65]. In 2012, Coutrot and co-workers have synthesized a novel double-lasso molecular machine 18 (Figure 15) containing two dibenzo-24-crown-8 (DB24C8) surrounding threads, each containing two alternative sites of interactions (also called ‘‘molecular stations’’) for the DB24C8 and they called this a rota-macrocycle in which the rotation of a molecular jump rope can be operated by controlling the translation of the DB24C8 moieties from an ammonium to a triazolium site [66]. In acidic medium, the internal cavity size of the double-lasso structure is large enough to cause an easy movement in dissociating solvents around the [c2] daisy chain (“jump rope” moving from 18a to 18b). The nonmethylated precursors of 18 have the same fast kinetic exchange. In nondissociating solvents in acid conditions there is a smaller repulsion between the 1,2,3-triazolium moieties and as a result the U-shape is more tightened than the one in more dissociating solvents such as CD3CN or DMSO-d6, which decreases the kinetic rate of the equilibrium between 18a and 18b, making both rotamers observable in the 1H NMR spectra.


Figure 15: Jump rope in molecular double-lasso compounds 18.

Conversely, after deprotonation of the ammonium moieties the macrocycle 18a is forced to adopt a helix-type contracted conformation (two slowly interconverting rotamers 18c and 18d) with a reduced cavity. These conformational changes are reversible in solution with switching pH.

4.3. A multivalent catenane and its motion in diverse pH media

Cell signaling, energy transduction, and cargo delivery are some of functions of very complicatedly assembled biomolecular machines. Multivalent interactions, compared to monovalent receptor–ligand interactions offer the advantage of multiple and sequential binding within the host–guest systems. These noncovalent interactions which can be controlled in a chemical or physical manner depend on the binding sites in the multivalent assembly [67]. Switchable mechanically interlocked molecules (MIM) that rely on multivalency have been studied rarely, thus Chen et al. have reported the design and highly efficacious synthesis of a novel two-component, triply interlocked [2](3)catenane C–H3·6PF6 19 (Figure 16) by use of a pyrazine-extended triptycene-derived tris(crown ether) host (eTC) via a dynamic covalent chemistry approach involving triple threading and a Grubbs-catalyzed ring-closing metathesis [68].


Figure 16: Chemical structure of compound 19 and acid–base triggered motions.

1H NMR titration experiments have been used for the identification of co-conformations of the four related stable states of 19. The authors have also determined the dissociation constant pKa of this acid−base switchable MIM system by an indicator method which could make a quantitative and precise estimation of its dynamics with environmental acidity change.

By combining NMR spectroscopic data and quantum chemistry calculations, a motion mechanism has been proposed for the MIM macrocycle 19 involving a stepwise co-conformational progression. After the deprotonation of dibenzylammonium (DBA) sites, the rings prefer to move toward the adjacent N-methyl-1,2,3-triazolium (MTA) sites to the thermodynamically stable co-conformations rather than migrating to the one which is located at a longer distance, either in a clockwise or counterclockwise sequence. As a single dibenzo-24-crown-8 (DB24C8) ring is not capable to show discriminating recognition for the two MTA sites, the selectivity would be strange indicating that a substantial relation exists between structure topology and mechanical properties [69]. It was argued that carrying out unidirectional 360° rotations, or achieving an all-around mechanostereoselectivity [70] control could be realized by introducing another functional spacer in the [2](3)catenane [71]. Considering that the paths of the B24C8 ring to nearby recognition sites are probably kinetically favorable. Thus, this kind of macrocycles can be used as molecular motors [72] with superior structural and mechanical properties and this could lead to an increased understanding of the mechanism of other complicated biological molecular machines.


Herein, we have illustrated the recent developments for the synthesis, applications and properties of 1,2,3-triazolium macrocycles. So far, mainly CuAAC reactions have been used for the synthesis of the triazole unit in the macrocycle. In this review we have briefly illustrated the way of utilizing different types of noncovalent interactions including hydrogen bonding, halogen and chalcogen bonding for the selective detection of anions by triazolium macrocycles. The selectivity and the ability of detection of anions are highly dependent on the solvent polarity. We have also described the design and application of 1,2,3-triazolium macrocycles in molecular reactors, pH sensors and drug carriers.

There are still lots of opportunities to design new 1,2,3-triazolium macrocycles as chemosensors for the highly selective recognition of ions in water or biological systems. By introducing a variety of chiral building blocks in the 1,2,3-triazolium macrocycles valuable insight may be provided into the enantioselective recognition and transformation of guest molecules. In the past decades, organocatalytic routes have emerged as an effective and ecofriendly approach towards the synthesis of functionalized and fused triazoles [24]. The methods are easily amenable to chiral natural products [73]. Accordingly, there is a significant potential for introducing these new strategies for the design of triazolium macrocycles.


We thank KU Leuven (Grant No. C12/016) and FWO (Grant No. G0F6619N) for financial support. Internal funds KU Leuven is also acknowledged for a postdoctoral fellowship (PDM), to PVS.


  1. Desiraju, G. R. Nature 2001, 412, 397–400. doi:10.1038/35086640
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Ariga, K.; Kunitake, T. Supramolecular Chemistry – Fundamentals and Applications; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2006. doi:10.1007/b137036
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  3. Gale, P. A.; Steed, J. W., Eds. Supramolecular Chemistry: From Molecules to Nanomaterials; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester, United Kingdom, 2012. doi:10.1002/9780470661345
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Wen, J. T.; Roper, J. M.; Tsutsui, H. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 9037–9053. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.8b00848
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Chen, Y.; Sun, S.; Lu, D.; Shi, Y.; Yao, Y. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2019, 30, 37–43. doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2018.10.022
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Geng, W.-C.; Sun, H.; Guo, D.-S. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2018, 92, 1–79. doi:10.1007/s10847-018-0819-8
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Chen, Z.; Wang, Q.; Wu, X.; Li, Z.; Jiang, Y.-B. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 4249–4263. doi:10.1039/c4cs00531g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Xu, Z.; Kim, S. K.; Yoon, J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1457–1466. doi:10.1039/b918937h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Yoon, J.; Kim, S. K.; Singh, N. J.; Kim, K. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 355–360. doi:10.1039/b513733k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Setsune, J.-i. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 3044–3101. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00430
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Vargas-Zúñiga, G. I.; Sessler, J. L. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 345, 281–296. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2017.04.004
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Suk, J.-m.; Chae, M. K.; Kim, N.-K.; Kim, U.-I.; Jeong, K.-S. Pure Appl. Chem. 2008, 80, 599–608. doi:10.1351/pac200880030599
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Black, D. S. C.; Craig, D. C.; Kumar, N. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 425–426. doi:10.1039/c39890000425
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Aizpurua, J. M.; Fratila, R. M.; Monasterio, Z.; Pérez-Esnaola, N.; Andreieff, E.; Irastorza, A.; Sagartzazu-Aizpurua, M. New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 474–480. doi:10.1039/c3nj00667k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Schulze, B.; Schubert, U. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 2522–2571. doi:10.1039/c3cs60386e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Peng, R.; Xu, Y.; Cao, Q. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2018, 29, 1465–1474. doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2018.09.001
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Hua, Y.; Flood, A. H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1262–1271. doi:10.1039/b818033b
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  18. Metrangolo, P.; Meyer, F.; Pilati, T.; Resnati, G.; Terraneo, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6114–6127. doi:10.1002/anie.200800128
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  19. Huisgen, R.; Szeimies, G.; Möbius, L. Chem. Ber. 1967, 100, 2494–2507. doi:10.1002/cber.19671000806
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Rostovtsev, V. V.; Green, L. G.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2596–2599. doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20020715)41:14<2596::aid-anie2596>3.0.co;2-4
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Tornøe, C. W.; Christensen, C.; Meldal, M. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3057–3064. doi:10.1021/jo011148j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Zhang, L.; Chen, X.; Xue, P.; Sun, H. H. Y.; Williams, I. D.; Sharpless, K. B.; Fokin, V. V.; Jia, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15998–15999. doi:10.1021/ja054114s
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Ding, S.; Jia, G.; Sun, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1877–1880. doi:10.1002/anie.201309855
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. John, J.; Thomas, J.; Dehaen, W. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 10797–10806. doi:10.1039/c5cc02319j
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  25. Marx, V. M.; Herbert, M. B.; Keitz, B. K.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 94–97. doi:10.1021/ja311241q
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Vasdev, R. A. S.; Preston, D.; Crowley, J. D. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 2402–2414. doi:10.1039/c6dt04702e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Mirjafari, A. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 2944–2961. doi:10.1039/c8cc00372f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Vivancos, Á.; Segarra, C.; Albrecht, M. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 9493–9586. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00148
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Steed, J. W. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 506–519. doi:10.1039/b810364j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Caballero, A.; Zapata, F.; González, L.; Molina, P.; Alkorta, I.; Elguero, J. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 4680–4682. doi:10.1039/c4cc00169a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Hudnall, T. W.; Gabbaï, F. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11978–11986. doi:10.1021/ja073793z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Brotherhood, P. R.; Davis, A. P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3633–3647. doi:10.1039/b926225n
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Davis, A. P. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 2939–2951. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.05.008
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Tamminen, J.; Kolehmainen, E. Molecules 2001, 6, 21–46. doi:10.3390/60100021
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Gautrot, J. E.; Zhu, X. X. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 5705–5716. doi:10.1039/b821340b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Chhatra, R. K.; Kumar, A.; Pandey, P. S. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 9086–9089. doi:10.1021/jo201161n
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Kumar, A.; Pandey, P. S. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 165–168. doi:10.1021/ol702457w
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Hinman, A. S.; Pavelich, B. J. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1989, 269, 53–61. doi:10.1016/0022-0728(89)80103-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Gilday, L. C.; White, N. G.; Beer, P. D. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 7092–7097. doi:10.1039/c2dt30124e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. White, N. G.; Beer, P. D. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2012, 8, 246–252. doi:10.3762/bjoc.8.25
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Li, S.; Liu, M.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, B.; Zhang, C.; Wen, X.; Li, N.; Huang, F. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 2103–2107. doi:10.1039/b803927e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Liu, Y.; Flood, A. H.; Bonvallet, P. A.; Vignon, S. A.; Northrop, B. H.; Tseng, H.-R.; Jeppesen, J. O.; Huang, T. J.; Brough, B.; Baller, M.; Magonov, S.; Solares, S. D.; Goddard, W. A.; Ho, C.-M.; Stoddart, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9745–9759. doi:10.1021/ja051088p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  43. Dichtel, W. R.; Miljanić, O. Š.; Spruell, J. M.; Heath, J. R.; Stoddart, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10388–10390. doi:10.1021/ja063127i
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  44. Leigh, D. A.; Wong, J. K. Y.; Dehez, F.; Zerbetto, F. Nature 2003, 424, 174–179. doi:10.1038/nature01758
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  45. Ikeda, T.; Stoddart, J. F. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2008, 9, No. 014104. doi:10.1088/1468-6996/9/1/014104
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Chmielewski, M. J.; Davis, J. J.; Beer, P. D. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 415–424. doi:10.1039/b818351a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  47. White, N. G.; Lovett, H. G.; Beer, P. D. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 12133–12147. doi:10.1039/c4ra00615a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Mercurio, J. M.; Caballero, A.; Cookson, J.; Beer, P. D. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 9298–9306. doi:10.1039/c4ra15380d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  49. Barendt, T. A.; Ferreira, L.; Marques, I.; Félix, V.; Beer, P. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 9026–9037. doi:10.1021/jacs.7b04295
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  50. Lim, J. Y. C.; Marques, I.; Thompson, A. L.; Christensen, K. E.; Félix, V.; Beer, P. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 3122–3133. doi:10.1021/jacs.6b12745
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  51. Kubik, S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3648–3663. doi:10.1039/b926166b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  52. White, N. G.; Carvalho, S.; Félix, V.; Beer, P. D. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 6951–6959. doi:10.1039/c2ob25934f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  53. Cai, J.; Hay, B. P.; Young, N. J.; Yang, X.; Sessler, J. L. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 1560–1567. doi:10.1039/c3sc22144j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  54. Mesquida, N.; Dinarès, I.; Ibáñez, A.; Alcalde, E. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 6385–6396. doi:10.1039/c3ob41214h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  55. Lee, D. Y.; Singh, N.; Kim, M. J.; Jang, D. O. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3024–3027. doi:10.1021/ol2008846
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  56. Jin, S.; Kato, S.-i.; Nakamura, Y. Chem. Lett. 2016, 45, 869–871. doi:10.1246/cl.160400
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  57. Iwasawa, N.; Takahagi, H.; Ono, K.; Fujii, K.; Uekusa, H. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 7477–7479. doi:10.1039/c2cc31989f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  58. Diederich, F. Cyclophanes; Monographs in Supramolecular Chemistry; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 1991. doi:10.1039/9781788010924
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  59. Li, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, R.; Liu, H.; Li, Y. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2014, 1, 661–667. doi:10.1039/c4qi00095a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  60. Guha, S.; Goodson, F. S.; Corson, L. J.; Saha, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13679–13691. doi:10.1021/ja303173n
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  61. Raynal, M.; Ballester, P.; Vidal-Ferran, A.; van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 1734–1787. doi:10.1039/c3cs60037h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  62. Li, Y.-j.; Zhao, Y.-j.; Flood, A. H.; Liu, C.; Liu, H.-b.; Li, Y.-l. Chem. – Eur. J. 2011, 17, 7499–7505. doi:10.1002/chem.201100633
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  63. Maeda, C.; Mitsuzane, M.; Ema, T. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 1853–1856. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.9b00447
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  64. Yang, W.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Chen, N.; Chen, S.; Liu, H.; Li, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 7750–7756. doi:10.1021/jo201068y
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  65. Coutrot, F.; Busseron, E. Chem. – Eur. J. 2008, 14, 4784–4787. doi:10.1002/chem.200800480
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  66. Romuald, C.; Ardá, A.; Clavel, C.; Jiménez-Barbero, J.; Coutrot, F. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 1851–1857. doi:10.1039/c2sc20072d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  67. Badjić, J. D.; Nelson, A.; Cantrill, S. J.; Turnbull, W. B.; Stoddart, J. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 723–732. doi:10.1021/ar040223k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  68. Meng, Z.; Han, Y.; Wang, L.-N.; Xiang, J.-F.; He, S.-G.; Chen, C.-F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9739–9745. doi:10.1021/jacs.5b05758
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  69. Barnes, J. C.; Frasconi, M.; Young, R. M.; Khdary, N. H.; Liu, W.-G.; Dyar, S. M.; McGonigal, P. R.; Gibbs-Hall, I. C.; Diercks, C. S.; Sarjeant, A. A.; Stern, C. L.; Goddard, W. A., III; Wasielewski, M. R.; Stoddart, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 10569–10572. doi:10.1021/ja505093d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  70. Fahrenbach, A. C.; Bruns, C. J.; Li, H.; Trabolsi, A.; Coskun, A.; Stoddart, J. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 482–493. doi:10.1021/ar400161z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  71. Baroncini, M.; Silvi, S.; Venturi, M.; Credi, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 4223–4226. doi:10.1002/anie.201200555
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  72. Hernández, J. V.; Kay, E. R.; Leigh, D. A. Science 2004, 306, 1532–1537. doi:10.1126/science.1103949
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  73. Thomas, J.; Jana, S.; John, J.; Liekens, S.; Dehaen, W. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 2885–2888. doi:10.1039/c5cc08347h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities