Synthesis of N-perfluoroalkyl-3,4-disubstituted pyrroles by rhodium-catalyzed transannulation of N-fluoroalkyl-1,2,3-triazoles with terminal alkynes

  1. Olga Bakhanovich1,2ORCID Logo,
  2. Viktor Khutorianskyi1ORCID Logo,
  3. Vladimir Motornov1ORCID Logo and
  4. Petr Beier1ORCID Logo

1Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Flemingovo náměstí 2, 166 10 Prague 6, Czech Republic
2Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Hlavova 2030/8, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic

  1. Corresponding author email

Associate Editor: I. Marek
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2021, 17, 504–510. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.17.44
Received 01 Dec 2020, Accepted 10 Feb 2021, Published 18 Feb 2021

Abstract

The rhodium-catalyzed transannulation of N-perfluoroalkyl-1,2,3-triazoles with aromatic and aliphatic terminal alkynes under microwave heating conditions afforded N-perfluoroalkyl-3,4-disubstituted pyrroles (major products) and N-fluoroalkyl-2,4-disubstituted pyrroles (minor products). The observed selectivities in the case of the reactions with aliphatic alkynes were high.

Keywords: pyrrole; transannulation; rhodium carbene; triazole

Introduction

Pyrroles are known to be important structural moieties appearing in natural products, synthetic drugs, agrochemicals, and functional materials (polymers, dyes, films, etc.) (Figure 1) [1-4]. Numerous methods exist for pyrrole synthesis, including the classical and industrially important condensation approaches, such as the Hantzsch, Huisgen, and Paal–Knorr processes [5]. However, the direct modification of pyrroles to the 3,4-disubstituted derivatives is challenging because an electrophilic aromatic substitution of pyrroles or the metalation of N-substituted pyrroles and the subsequent reaction with electrophiles take place in position two of the ring [6,7].

[1860-5397-17-44-1]

Figure 1: Selected pyrrole-containing natural products, drugs, agrochemicals, and functional materials.

Recently, N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles, conveniently prepared by [3 + 2] cycloadditions of terminal alkynes with sulfonyl azides, have been used as the precursors to N-sulfonylindoles by transition-metal-catalyzed transannulation reactions. In the presence of Rh(II) or Ni(0) catalysts the triazole ring-opening takes place and intermediate highly electrophilic metal-bound iminocarbenes form. These iminocarbenes undergo a variety of intriguing reactions, such as a cycloaddition and a C–H functionalization, among others, leading mostly to nitrogen heterocycles [8-10]. Using this chemistry, a variety of pyrroles have been prepared starting from N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles (Scheme 1) [11-17].

[1860-5397-17-44-i1]

Scheme 1: Transformation of N-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles to pyrroles via metal iminocarbenes.

We have recently reported that N-perfluoroalkyl-1,2,3-triazoles [18] undergo rhodium-catalyzed transannulation reactions leading to various nitrogen heterocycles, such as imidazoles, pyrrolones, imidazolones, oxazoles, azepines [19-22], and pyrroles [19].

The use of fluorine atoms and fluoro groups (including the trifluoromethyl group) is a widely used strategy to improve the properties of drug candidates or agrochemicals [23-28]. The development of new methods for the synthesis of selectively fluorinated and trifluorometylated compounds is essential for future progress in areas that eventually improve the quality of life. In this context, N-trifluoromethylated compounds (amines, amides and nitrogen heterocycles) are a relatively underexplored group of molecules with a high potential in medicinal chemistry [29,30]. Taking inspiration from the work of Gevorgyan (Scheme 1h) [11], we report herein our recent results on the rhodium-catalyzed transannulation of N-perfluoroalkyl-1,2,3-triazoles with terminal alkynes leading to unusually substituted N-perfluoroalkylpyrroles.

Results and Discussion

The published transannulation of N-tosyl-1,2,3-triazoles with terminal alkynes requires the use of a Rh/Ag binary catalyst system, works only with electron-rich arylacetylenes and leads to N-tosyl-2,4-disubstituted pyrroles (Scheme 1h) [11]. The application of these conditions to N-trifluoromethyltriazole 1a and phenylacetylene leads to a mixture of 3,4-diphenylpyrrole 2a and 2,4-diphenylpyrrole 2a’. However, repeating the experiment without the silver catalyst afforded the same results showing that the silver catalyst was not necessary in our case and that the product regioselectivity was not dependent on the silver catalyst (Table 1, entry 1). Chloroform was found to be the most suitable solvent and varying rhodium catalysts led to the 2a + 2a’ product mixture of various ratios. Rh2(oct)4 and Rh2(esp)2 gave the highest 2a/2a’ ratio, while the electron-deficient Rh2(pfb)4 catalyst gave the lowest 2a/2a’ ratio and an incomplete conversion. Reducing the reaction temperature to 80 °C afforded a full conversion of the starting triazole, but no reaction took place at 60 °C. The optimized conditions are presented in Table 1, entry 8; however, for the following reaction scope study, a temperature of 100 °C and 20 min reaction time were used to ensure a full conversion for all studied substrates.

Table 1: Reaction conditions screening of the transannulation of triazole 1a with phenylacetylene.

[Graphic 1]
Entry [Rh] Solvent Temp. (°C) Conv. (%)a 2a/2a’
1b Rh2(oct)4 cyclohexane 120 90 75:25
2 Rh2(oct)4 CHCl3 120 100 60:40
3 Rh2(OAc)4 CHCl3 120 100 34:66
4 Rh2(esp)2 CHCl3 120 100 75:25
5 Rh2(pfb)4 CHCl3 120 54 14:86
6 Rh2(esp)2 CHCl3 100 100 75:25
7 Rh2(esp)2 DCE 100 100 40:60
8 Rh2(esp)2 CHCl3 80 100 75:25
9 Rh2(esp)2 CHCl3 60 NR

NR: no reaction. oct: n-C7H15COO. esp: α,α,α′,α′-tetramethyl-1,3-benzenedipropionate. pfb: n-C3F7COO. aConversion of 1a was determined by 19F NMR spectroscopy. bThe same result was observed in the presence of CF3COOAg (5 mol %) in addition to Rh2(oct)4 (1 mol %).

Next, the transannulation reaction was tested using a range of different substituted N-trifluoromethyl- and N-pentafluoroethyl-4-aryl-1,2,3-triazoles 1 with phenylacetylene (Scheme 2). Good to moderate yields of product mixtures 2 and 2’ were obtained and the 2/2’ ratio ranged from 59:41 to 79:21.

[1860-5397-17-44-i2]

Scheme 2: Transannulation of triazoles 2 with phenylacetylene.

While aliphatic alkynes were found to be ineffective in transannulations with N-tosyl-1,2,3-triazoles, the reactions of N-perfluoroalkyl-1,2,3-triazoles with aliphatic alkynes proceeded well and the pyrroles 3 were formed in unexpectedly high selectivities, ranging from 87:13 to 98:2 (Scheme 3). The isolated product yields were moderate to good and the products were generally obtained as mixtures of regioisomers. Column chromatography allowed the separation of pure isomers of 2a, 2a’, 3a, 3b, 3d, 3h, 3l, 3m, and 3n. However, no general trend in the efficiency of the reaction or product selectivity was observed.

[1860-5397-17-44-i3]

Scheme 3: Transannulation of N-perfluoroalkyl-1,2,3-triazoles with aliphatic alkynes.

Hex-5-ynenitrile was used in the transannulation with 1a with the aim to assess the relative propensity of nitrile and alkyne groups in the reaction. The triple bond reacted in the transannulation about two times faster than the nitrile group and again the 3,4-disubstituted pyrrole 4 regioisomer dominated over the 2,4-disubstitued pyrrole 4’ (Scheme 4).

[1860-5397-17-44-i4]

Scheme 4: Reaction of 1a with hex-5-ynenitrile.

To demonstrate the compatibility of the formed N-perfluoroalkylpyrroles with the conditions of pyrrole derivatization by metalation in position two and reaction with an electrophile, the crude product 2a was treated with butyllithium, followed by the reaction with carbon dioxide to afford pyrrole carboxylic acid 6 in a good overall yield (Scheme 5). The trifluoromethyl group on the nitrogen was not affected by these highly basic reaction conditions.

[1860-5397-17-44-i5]

Scheme 5: Metalation and carboxylation of in situ-prepared pyrrole 2a.

The mechanism of the rhodium-catalyzed transannulation to pyrroles has recently been investigated computationally with N-sulfonyltriazoles [31]. It seems that the formed rhodium carbenoid B reacts with the alkyne in a concerted process and even in the presence of Ag+ salts, a nucleophilic addition of silver acetylides does not take place. In our case, the transition states TS1 and TS2 have roughly similar energies for phenylacetylene and TS1 is lower in energy for aliphatic alkynes (Scheme 6).

[1860-5397-17-44-i6]

Scheme 6: Plausible mechanism for rhodium-catalyzed transannulation of N-perfluoroalkyl-1,2,3-triazoles with alkynes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the rhodium-catalyzed transannulation of N-perfluoroalkyl-1,2,3-triazoles with terminal alkynes was described. The reaction led to a mixture of the N-perfluoroalkyl-3,4- and 2,4-disubstituted pyrroles. The reactions with phenylacetylene afforded a mixture of 3,4- and 2,4-disubstituted pyrroles in a ratio from 59:41 to 79:21, while the reactions with aliphatic acetylenes gave higher product regioselectivities (87:13 to 98:2). This is the first report of a transannulation leading to 3,4-disubstituted pyrroles. Additionally, the method did not require the use of a silver(I) co-catalyst. The scope for aliphatic alkynes is reasonably wide and the isolated yields were moderate to good. A one-pot transannulation/carboxylation process was demonstrated for the construction of the functionalized pyrrole 2-carboxylic acid with an N-trifluoromethyl functionality. Thus, this work improves the synthetic access to N-perfluoroalkyl-3,4-disubstituted pyrroles.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Experimental part.
Format: PDF Size: 7.3 MB Download

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Czech Academy of Sciences (Research Plan RVO: 61388963) and by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports in the program INTER-EXCELLENCE (LTAUSA18037).

References

  1. Gupton, J. T. Top. Heterocycl. Chem. 2006, 2, 53–92. doi:10.1007/7081_019
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Guernion, N. L.; Hayes, W. Curr. Org. Chem. 2004, 8, 637–651. doi:10.2174/1385272043370771
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Bhardwaj, V.; Gumber, D.; Abbot, V.; Dhiman, S.; Sharma, P. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 15233–15266. doi:10.1039/c4ra15710a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Kaur, R.; Manjal, S. K.; Rawal, R. K.; Kumar, K. J. Pharm. Chem. Chem. Sci. 2017, 1, 17–32.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Joule, J. A.; Keith, M. Heterocyclic Chemistry, 5th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2010.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Leeper, F. J.; Kelly, J. M. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2013, 45, 171–210. doi:10.1080/00304948.2013.786590
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Bellina, F.; Rossi, R. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 7213–7256. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2006.05.024
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Davies, H. M. L.; Alford, J. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5151–5162. doi:10.1039/c4cs00072b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Chattopadhyay, B.; Gevorgyan, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 862–872. doi:10.1002/anie.201104807
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Anbarasan, P.; Yadagiri, D.; Rajasekar, S. Synthesis 2014, 46, 3004–3023. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1379303
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Chattopadhyay, B.; Gevorgyan, V. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3746–3749. doi:10.1021/ol2014347
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  12. Kim, C.-E.; Park, S.; Eom, D.; Seo, B.; Lee, P. H. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 1900–1903. doi:10.1021/ol500718s
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Rajasekar, S.; Anbarasan, P. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 8428–8434. doi:10.1021/jo501043h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Parr, B. T.; Green, S. A.; Davies, H. M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 4716–4718. doi:10.1021/ja401386z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Lei, X.; Li, L.; He, Y.-P.; Tang, Y. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 5224–5227. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.5b02570
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Miura, T.; Hiraga, K.; Biyajima, T.; Nakamuro, T.; Murakami, M. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 3298–3301. doi:10.1021/ol401340u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Miura, T.; Yamauchi, M.; Murakami, M. Chem. Commun. 2009, 1470–1471. doi:10.1039/b819162j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Blastik, Z. E.; Voltrová, S.; Matoušek, V.; Jurásek, B.; Manley, D. W.; Klepetářová, B.; Beier, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 346–349. doi:10.1002/anie.201609715
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Motornov, V.; Markos, A.; Beier, P. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 3258–3261. doi:10.1039/c8cc01446a
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  20. Motornov, V.; Beier, P. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 15195–15201. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.8b02472
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Motornov, V.; Košťál, V.; Markos, A.; Täffner, D.; Beier, P. Org. Chem. Front. 2019, 6, 3776–3780. doi:10.1039/c9qo01104h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Tichý, D.; Košt́ál, V.; Motornov, V.; Klimánková, I.; Beier, P. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 11482–11489. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.0c01610
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. O’Hagan, D. J. Fluorine Chem. 2010, 131, 1071–1081. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2010.03.003
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Han, J.; Remete, A. M.; Dobson, L. S.; Kiss, L.; Izawa, K.; Moriwaki, H.; Soloshonok, V. A.; O’Hagan, D. J. Fluorine Chem. 2020, 239, 109639. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2020.109639
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Zhou, Y.; Wang, J.; Gu, Z.; Wang, S.; Zhu, W.; Aceña, J. L.; Soloshonok, V. A.; Izawa, K.; Liu, H. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 422–518. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00392
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Wang, J.; Sánchez-Roselló, M.; Aceña, J. L.; del Pozo, C.; Sorochinsky, A. E.; Fustero, S.; Soloshonok, V. A.; Liu, H. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 2432–2506. doi:10.1021/cr4002879
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Purser, S.; Moore, P. R.; Swallow, S.; Gouverneur, V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 320–330. doi:10.1039/b610213c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Meanwell, N. A. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 5822–5880. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01788
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Schiesser, S.; Chepliaka, H.; Kollback, J.; Quennesson, T.; Czechtizky, W.; Cox, R. J. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 13076–13089. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01457
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Scattolin, T.; Bouayad-Gervais, S.; Schoenebeck, F. Nature 2019, 573, 102–107. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1518-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Zhang, Z.; Yang, S.; Li, J.; Liao, X. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 9639–9646. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.6b01706
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2021 Bakhanovich et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular requires that the author(s) and source are credited and that individual graphics may be subject to special legal provisions.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/terms)

 
Back to Article List

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities

Keep Informed

RSS Feed

Subscribe to our Latest Articles RSS Feed.

Subscribe

Follow the Beilstein-Institut

LinkedIn

Twitter: @BeilsteinInst