Synthetic reactions driven by electron-donor–acceptor (EDA) complexes

  1. 1 ,
  2. 1 ,
  3. 1 ,
  4. 2 ,
  5. 1 and
  6. 1
1School of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
2Irradiation Preservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Radiation Chemistry Department, Sichuan Institute of Atomic Energy, Chengdu 610100, China
  1. Corresponding author email
Associate Editor: C. Stephenson
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2021, 17, 771–799.
Received 17 Oct 2020, Accepted 03 Mar 2021, Published 06 Apr 2021
cc by logo


The reversible, weak ground-state aggregate formed by dipole–dipole interactions between an electron donor and an electron acceptor is referred to as an electron-donor–acceptor (EDA) complex. Generally, upon light irradiation, the EDA complex turns into the excited state, causing an electron transfer to give radicals and to initiate subsequent reactions. Besides light as an external energy source, reactions involving the participation of EDA complexes are mild, obviating transition metal catalysts or photosensitizers in the majority of cases and are in line with the theme of green chemistry. This review discusses the synthetic reactions concerned with EDA complexes as well as the mechanisms that have been shown over the past five years.



Electron transfer (ET) is a very common occurrence in the field of natural science, including photochemical, electrochemical, and enzymatic reactions and even major organic synthesis. From 1950 to 1952, Mulliken suggested an electron transfer hypothesis that could more precisely explain electron transfer phenomena based on the electron-donor–acceptor (EDA) complex [1-3]. Significantly, a broad absorption peak unrelated to the structure, called charge-transfer band, is typically located in the visible region of the UV–vis spectrum [4], which manifests the color variability of the mixed solution of the electron donor (D) and electron acceptor (A). The two components A and D may not absorb visible light, but the resulting EDA complex does [5]. If the EDA complex is irradiated with a particular wavelength (or heated to a corresponding temperature), the complex could be excited to the state [D, A]*, causing electron transfer and forming a pair of radical ions trapped in the solvent cage. The pair of radical ions escapes the solvent cage by diffusion to give radical ions, which could initiate chemical reactions or reverse electron transfer (Scheme 1) [6]. The continuously increasing demand for sustainable synthesis has encouraged chemists to pursue more efficient methods to manufacture fine and usable chemicals [7]. The reactions that EDA complexes participate in have been shown to be an enormous success, mainly due to the fact that they obviate photoredox catalysts or transition metal catalysts in the vast majority cases. Moreover, in line with the theme of green chemistry, light is the sole external energy source in EDA complex pathways. Except for the pioneering research on EDA complexes in the 20th century, there was not much progress in the follow-up. Until the past few years, EDA-complex photochemistry has attracted more and more chemists and provided new opportunities for synthetic chemistry [8]. Moreover, diverse photocatalyst-free photochemical reactions have been employed to construct carbon–carbon and carbon–heteroatom bonds [9]. Among these methods, the product formations by aid of EDA complexes are the simplest and most rapid way. In this review, the focus lies on cyclization reactions, C–C-, C–S-, C–B-, C–N-, C–P-, C–O-, and C–H bond formation, primarily summarizing the chemical reaction step involving the EDA complex (Table 1) as well as the underlying mechanisms that have appeared over the last five years.


Scheme 1: The electron transfer process in EDA complexes.

Table 1: The EDA complexes discussed in this review.

EDA complex Ref. EDA complex Ref. EDA complex Ref
[Graphic 1] [10] [Graphic 2] [11] [Graphic 3] [12]
[Graphic 4] [13] [Graphic 5] [14] [Graphic 6] [15]
[Graphic 7] [16] [Graphic 8] [17] [Graphic 9] [18]
[Graphic 10] [19] [Graphic 11] [20] [Graphic 12] [21]
[Graphic 13] [22] [Graphic 14] [23] [Graphic 15] [24]
[Graphic 16] [25] [Graphic 17] [26] [Graphic 18] [27]
[Graphic 19] [28] [Graphic 20] [29,30] [Graphic 21] [31]
[Graphic 22] [32] [Graphic 23]
n = 1,3,4,6–8
[33] [Graphic 24] [34]
[Graphic 25] [11] [Graphic 26] [35] [Graphic 27]
n = 1–4,6
[Graphic 28] [37] [Graphic 29] [38] [Graphic 30] [39]
[Graphic 31] [40] [Graphic 32] [41] [Graphic 33] [42]
[Graphic 34] [43] [Graphic 35] [44] [Graphic 36] [45]
[Graphic 37] [46] [Graphic 38] [47] [Graphic 39] [48]
[Graphic 40] [49] [Graphic 41] [50] [Graphic 42] [51]
[Graphic 43] [52] [Graphic 44] [53] [Graphic 45] [54]
[Graphic 46] [55] [Graphic 47]
n = 2,3,4,6,8,10
[56] [Graphic 48] [57]
[Graphic 49] [58]        

Cyclization reactions

In the pharmaceutical industry, retail drugs with a heterocyclic composition have exceeded 60% of the market volume. Hence, cyclization reaction innovation seems to be a requisite for pharmaceutical industry and human health. As an outstanding way, free-radical cascade reactions could efficiently construct various carbocycles and heterocycles with multifarious structures and complexity [59-61]. Centered on this context, we give a clear overview on a variety of novel cyclization reactions initiated by EDA complexes from the recent years.

In 2016, Lakhdar and colleagues [10] obtained the target product 3 with LED (5 W) irradiation of a solution containing arylphosphine oxide 2, alkynes 1, eosin Y (EY, 4 mol %), N-ethoxy-2-methylpyridinium (4), and sodium bicarbonate in DMF (Scheme 2). As a distinct example of EDA complexes, the process efficiency depends on the association of eosin Y and oxidant 4 to a donor–acceptor EY–4 ground-system complex (high reactivity). Due to the ability of aryl groups to stabilize the formed alkenyl radical, this protocol could control regioselectivity efficiently with unsymmetrical alkynes. In addition, EPR spectroscopy shows that phosphono radicals could proceed throughout the reaction.


Scheme 2: Synthesis of benzo[b]phosphorus oxide 3 initiated by an EDA complex.

A halogen bond (XB) is a noncovalent interaction formed between a halogen atom and a neutral or negatively charged Lewis base. It is a kind of weak intermolecular interaction analogous to a hydrogen bond and basically can be considered as a specific EDA complex [62]. In 2016, Yu and colleagues [33] employed perfluoroalkyl iodide 6 as halogen-bond donor (electron acceptor) and the organic base dibenzylamine as the halogen-bond acceptor (electron donor) to form the XB complex 8, and then a fluoroalkyl radical was given via visible-light-induced single-electron-transfer process. 1,2-Diisocyanato-4,5-xylene (5) was able to capture the fluoroalkyl radical, eventually providing the quinoxaline derivative 7 (Scheme 3).


Scheme 3: Mechanism of the synthesis of quinoxaline derivative 7.

In 2017, Fu and colleagues [20] selected 1-phenyl-2-(piperidin-1-yl)ethanone O-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)oxime (9) as substrates under 23 W CFL (compact fluorescent lamp) irradiation, affording the desired imidazole derivative 10 by utilizing DMSO as the solvent at room temperature (Scheme 4). It is worth noting that, unlike most reported intermolecular electron-transfer via an EDA complex pathway, this approach transfers electrons from the electron-rich tertiary amine nitrogen atom to the electron-deficient benzene ring, achieving intramolecular electron transfer. Selective C–H-functionalization also includes no catalysts, oxidants, additives, acids and bases, which is of great significance in the synthesis and application of N-heterocyclic compounds.


Scheme 4: Synthesis of imidazole derivative 10 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2017, Wu and colleagues [58] uncovered the use of the bis(sulfur dioxide) adduct of DABCO, 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane·(SO2)2, as sulfone source in the EDA complex formation by 4-methyl-1-(p-tolyl)pentan-1-one O-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)oxime (11) towards the aminosulfonylation, employing blue light as irradiation source (Scheme 5). It has to be said that nitrogen radicals played a coordinating role in the sulfonation step. Additionally, to verify the applicability of this approach, 1H-benzo[d][1,2]thiazine 2,2-dioxides have been prepared successfully.


Scheme 5: Synthesis of sulfamoylation product 12 initiated by an EDA complex.

A possible reaction mechanism for this transformation is as follows (Scheme 6): Firstly, O-aryloxime 11 forms EDA complex 13 by action of DABCO·(SO2)2 and then undergoes light-promoted single-electron transfer, affording the 2,4-dinitrophenol anion, nitrogen radical 14, and radical 15, respectively. 1,5-HAT (hydrogen atom transfer) occurs in nitrogen radical 14 to give radical 16, which further transforms to radical 17 after the addition of sulfur dioxide. Finally, HAT happens between 15 and 17, yielding quaternary ammonium salt 18 and product 12, respectively.


Scheme 6: Mechanism of the synthesis of sulfamoylation product 12.

In 2017, Chen and colleagues [47] accomplished the cyclization through the EDA complex formed by N-tosyl-2-vinylaniline (19) and the Umemoto reagent 20 (CF3 radical source) in CH2Cl2 under blue LED irradiation. In the presence of base, 21 was produced with 98% yield after degassing. Along with straightforward posttreatment, the corresponding reduction product 22 can be afforded easily (Scheme 7). This procedure offers a novel cyclization method with bifunctionalization, causing a multicomponent reaction of vinylaniline, halide, and sulfonylate to give corresponding indole derivatives. Furthermore, a wide variety of applicable substrates and good functional-group tolerance are provided by this approach, yielding multiple indole analogues with biological activity.


Scheme 7: Synthesis of indole derivative 22 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2017, Liang and Bi [56] reported a visible-light-induced three-component cyclization of ethyl acetoacetate (23), perfluoroalkyl iodides 24, and guanidine hydrochloride (25) via a halogen-bond adduct. The first light-promoted three-component reaction has been realized by a halogen-bond adduct, forming perfluoroalkylated pyrimidines 26 (Scheme 8). A variety of perfluorinated chains were assembled with methylene compounds and guanidines or amidines, giving the corresponding perfluoroalkylated pyrimidines in good to excellent yield.


Scheme 8: Synthesis of perfluoroalkylated pyrimidines 26 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2017, Chen and colleagues [34] prepared the phenanthridine derivative 29 with CFL (25 W) irradiation of a solution containing 27, perfluoroalkyl iodide 28, amine additive N,N,N´,N´-tetraethylethylenediamine (TEEDA) in THF (Scheme 9). TEEDA and perfluoroalkyl iodide form a halogen-bond adduct, and then light-induced electron transfer happens in order to give a perfluoroalkyl radical. The protocol can realize alkene- and alkyne iodide perfluoroalkylation and C–H perfluoroalkylation of electron-rich heteroaromatic hydrocarbons, providing a novel protocol for the synthesis of perfluoroalkyl-substituted phenanthridines.


Scheme 9: Synthesis of phenanthridine derivative 29 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2018, Sundén and Hsu [31] proposed a method of adding an α-aminoalkyl radical to maleimide via an EDA complex based on previous work (Scheme 10). The corresponding products can be given in good yield by modifying substituents on the N-alkyl moiety in 31 or N,N-dimethylaniline (30). This approach utilizes N,N-dimethylaniline (30) as electron donor and N-methylmaleimide (31) as electron acceptor to form an EDA complex, so that single-electron transfer occurs under ultraviolet-light irradiation. Subsequently, intermolecular proton transfer takes place, giving radicals 33 and 34. Radical 34 is quenched by oxygen, and radical 33 attacks 31 in order to form radical 35. Intermediate 36 is achieved by cyclization of radical 35, followed by hydrogen-atom removal, providing the cis-tetrahydroquinoline 32 (Scheme 11). It is worth noting that the EDA complex not only undergoes charge transfer but also proton transfer in this approach. The optimization experiment showed that the wavelength of the light source must overlap with the absorption spectrum of the EDA complex. Most importantly, given that the best yield was achieved when the molar concentration of 30 was 7 times that of 31, the concentration of the EDA complex was essential for a high reaction rate.


Scheme 10: Synthesis of cis-tetrahydroquinoline derivative 32 initiated by an EDA complex.


Scheme 11: Mechanism of the synthesis of cis-tetrahydroquinoline derivative 32.

In 2018, Yu and colleagues [22] discovered a method that employed O-aryloxime 37 and triethylamine as substrates at room temperature and blue-light irradiation to give phenanthridine 38 (also including quinoline products, Scheme 12). In this way, a nitrogen-centered radical was given via the EDA complex that was initiated by single-electron transfer, accomplishing the synthesis of a variety of highly functionalized nitrogen-containing aromatics with excellent yield.


Scheme 12: Synthesis of phenanthridine derivative 38 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2019, Fu and colleagues [35] received the target product 40 with 23 W CFL irradiation of a solution containing 1-(4′-hydroxy-[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-yl)ethanone O-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)oxime (39) and 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) in CH3CN (Scheme 13). Ready-made DBU serves two roles: base and electron donor. Furthermore, due to the commercially available material and wide range of substrates, this approach has major significance for drug scaffold methodologies, providing useful strategy for the synthesis of spiropyrrolines.


Scheme 13: Synthesis of spiropyrroline derivative 40 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2019, Yu and colleagues [23] reported the utilization of tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA) as additive in the EDA complex formation with perfluoroalkyl iodides 42 to afford 2-perfluoroalkylbenzothiazole products 43, employing blue LEDs (25 W) as irradiation source (Scheme 14). Notably, as (2-isocyanophenyl)(methyl)selane was exploited instead of substrate 41, new fluoroalkylbenzoselenazole derivatives with biological potential could also be given successfully. Furthermore, several perfluoroalkyl iodides ICnF2n+1 (n = 3–8,10) and four other fluoroalkyl iodides, including ICF(CF3)2, ICF2COOEt, ICF2CF2Cl, and ICF2CF2Br were reacted smoothly with 41, affording the corresponding products in good to excellent yield. The protocol conforms to the characteristics of green and environmental conservation, having a reaction time of only 1 hour, achieving the purpose of saving energy.


Scheme 14: Synthesis of benzothiazole derivative 43 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2019, Liang and colleagues [24] reported a method for preparing perfluoroalkyl-s-triazine via visible-light-promoted [5 + 1] cyclization initiated by an EDA complex. Perfluoroalkyl-s-triazine derivative 45 was synthesized by the reaction of biguanidine derivative 44 and perfluoroalkyl iodide 28 in the presence of sodium hydroxide (Scheme 15). Considering that oxygen played an indispensable role in the process, the authors supposed that it may facilitate single-electron transfer between biguanidine anion and perfluoroalkyl halide. By constructing two C–N bonds at the same time, the triazine heterocyclic structure that is commonly utilized in medical and material fields was accomplished by [5 + 1] cyclization.


Scheme 15: Synthesis of perfluoroalkyl-s-triazine derivative 45 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2020, Taylor and colleagues [26] proposed a reaction for the preparation of spirocyclic indoline derivative 47 from indolylynone 46 and thiophenol under blue-light irradiation (Scheme 16). An abundant range of products was given to test various indole-tethered ynones and thiols, confirming that the reaction is broad in scope. Remarkably, C–S bonds and spiro compounds have been constructed simultaneously in this approach, which are promising for drug synthesis. Substrate 46 comprises both indole and alkynone groups, leading to light-promoted intramolecular electron transfer in order to form radical intermediate 48. Then, 48 absorbs the hydrogen atom of thiophenol, yielding a thiophenol radical. The addition of the thiophenol radical to alkynone forms radical intermediate 49. Radical intermediate 50 is given due to the cyclization of radical intermediate 49, followed by abstracting hydrogen atoms from thiophenol to produce the final product 47 (Scheme 17).


Scheme 16: Synthesis of indoline derivative 47 initiated by an EDA complex.


Scheme 17: Mechanism of the synthesis of spirocyclic indoline derivative 47.

In 2020, Alemán and colleagues [53] proposed an approach in which ketene 48 and diene 49 condense with the help of diamine 51 to afford cyclobutane product 50 (Scheme 18). The reaction could be catalyzed by a simple diamine due to the fact that diamine can condense with the enol substrate, forming an imine-ion intermediate absorbing in the visible region. The direct excitation of the intermediate leads to a charge-transfer excited state, completing the stereocontrolled intermolecular cycloaddition reaction with a good ratio of enantiomer to diastereomer.


Scheme 18: Synthesis of cyclobutane product 50 initiated by an EDA complex.

A plausible mechanism is shown in Scheme 19. In the presence of acid, EDA complex 52 is formed by ketene 48 and diamine 51. Then, the ground state 52 transforms into excited state 53 or into unproductive charge-transfer excited state 54 that can restore ground state 52 by BET; moreover, 53 and 54 can be mutually transformed. Excited state 53 reacts with diene 49, forming a double radical intermediate 55 that subsequently evolves to cyclobutyliminium ion 56, and then product 50 is provided after hydrolysis, along with the release of diamine 51.


Scheme 19: Mechanism of the synthesis of spirocyclic indoline derivative 50.

In 2020, Zhang and colleagues [25] developed a visible-light-induced [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction between glycine derivatives 57 and aryl epoxides 58, which can efficiently prepare a series of multisubstituted 1,3-oxazolidines 59 at room temperature (Scheme 20). The strategy can be applied smoothly to an extensive range of glycine derivatives, including electron-donating or electron-withdrawing substituent groups in the para- or meta positions at the benzene rings, giving corresponding products in moderate yield. This protocol is also suitable for the structural diversity of epoxides, providing a new activation approach for C(sp3)–H-functionalization of glycine derivatives.


Scheme 20: Synthesis of 1,3-oxazolidine compound 59 initiated by an EDA complex.

The construction of C–C bonds

As a crucial element in the construction of various organic scaffolds, the formation of C–C bonds remains a hot topic in the field of synthetic organic chemistry. The conventional approaches of C–C-bond construction typically employ transition-metal catalysts, such as in the Suzuki–Miyaura and Heck coupling reactions. Methodologies for forming different C–C bonds have recently been developed in the field of single-electron chemistry [63-65]. Considering that EDA-complex-initiated free-radical reactions are carried out under mild conditions, more attention has been paid to this efficient strategy for C–C-bond formation.

In 2015, Yu and colleagues [27] proposed a method for direct C–H trifluoromethylation of aromatic hydrocarbons through an EDA complex. Trifluoromethylated product 61 was synthesized by employing tryptamine derivative 60 and Umemoto reagent 20 as substrates as well as N-methylmorpholine (NMM) as organic base additive at room temperature (Scheme 21). The highly functionalized indole, pyrrole, benzofuran, and electron-rich benzene containing CF3 can be given in good yield. Given the redox potential of NMM and Umemoto reagent, directly conducting thermodynamic intermolecular SET is impossible. Thus, it is worth noting that the SET in this approach can be carried out only at room temperature without visible light.


Scheme 21: Synthesis of trifluoromethylated product 61 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2015, Melchiorre and colleagues [28] proposed a visible-light-induced reaction to synthesize indole alkylation product 64 by exploiting the EDA complex formed by 3-methylindole (62) and 2,4-dinitrobenzyl bromide (63), with 2,6-dimethylpyridine as additive at room temperature (Scheme 22). The substrates with different substituents at position C2 and C3 of indole have been synthesized smoothly, including cis-fused pyrrolo- and furanoindolines. The X-ray single-crystal analysis showed that the EDA complex is received in the form of a face-to-face π–π complex, and the ratio of donor to acceptor is 1:1.


Scheme 22: Synthesis of indole alkylation product 64 initiated by an EDA complex.

In the same year, based on previous experimental phenomena and data, Melchiorre and colleagues [45] designed a reaction, with indanone derivatives 65 and perfluorohexyl iodide (66) as substrates and a phase-transfer catalyst (PTC) to give perfluoroalkylation product 67 under white-light irradiation (Scheme 23). A variety of electron-withdrawing substituents on the aromatic ring of 65 were well tolerated; however, the presence of electron-donating substituents lowered the reactivity due to a negative impact on the EDA complex formation and led to a low yield. It is worth noting that the phase-transfer catalyst employed in this experiment is a suitable donor for the photosensitive EDA complex while at the same time providing effective asymmetric induction in the capture of the resulting radical along with enantioselectivity of the product.


Scheme 23: Synthesis of perfluoroalkylation product 67 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2016, based on the experimental work in 2015 [27], Yu and colleagues [29] reported a type of EDA complex that could complete the hydrotrifluoromethylation of unactivated olefins and alkynes. This approach employed 68 and Togni reagent 69 (electron acceptor) as substrates, NMM as electron donor, and pyrrolidin-2-one as solvent to give hydrotrifluoromethylated product 70 at room temperature (Scheme 24). CF3 was added to a variety of terminal alkenes, leading to corresponding hydrotrifluoromethylation products with moderate to good yield.


Scheme 24: Synthesis of hydrotrifluoromethylated product 70 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2017, Yu and colleagues [30] proposed an EDA-complex-induced alkyne trifluoromethylation reaction. The EDA complex formed by a catalytic quantity of Togni reagent 69 and NMM initiated the chain propagation, causing the final alkyne trifluoromethylation (Scheme 25). A variety of olefins, such as ene carbamates, styrene, aliphatic olefins, vinyl ethers, and acrylates are compatible in this approach, affording corresponding β-(trifluoromethyl)alkynes with good to excellent yield. The bifunctionalization was achieved by an EDA-complex-initiated three-component reaction in the absence of light, which is of great significance for the later study of temperature-driven EDA complexes.


Scheme 25: Synthesis of β-trifluoromethylated alkyne product 71 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2017, König and colleagues [42] discovered an EDA complex 75 formed by bromothiophene 72, aniline (73), and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) as organic base additive to give corresponding thiophene radical 76 and aniline radical cation under irradiation with light. Then, 76 reacted with 73, giving rise to corresponding radical 77. Finally, product 74 was given via hydrogen atom transfer (Scheme 26). In contrast to (hetero)aryl halides with indispensable electron-withdrawing groups, the scope of the reaction comprises anilines including electron-withdrawing or electron-donating substituents in the arene, except N-acetylated or ortho-halogenated anilines.


Scheme 26: Mechanism of the synthesis of 2-phenylthiophene derivative 74.

In 2017, Chen and colleagues [21] reported a method that promoted the formation of an alkoxy radical through an EDA complex under visible-light irradiation. The EDA complex formed by electron donor Hantzsch ester (HE) 79 and electron acceptor N-acyloxybenzamide 78 was produced by light-promoted SET, providing alkoxy radicals that could give carbon radicals by removing one molecule of acetaldehyde (Scheme 27). It is worth noting that EDA complex has been firstly employed for the generation of alkoxy radicals under visible-light irradiation, achieving selective C(sp3)–C(sp3)-bond cleavage and allylation or alkenylation.


Scheme 27: Synthesis of allylated product 80 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2017, Li and colleagues [57] reported a reaction for the synthesis of trifluoromethyl alkynylation product 84 with alkynyl sulfone 83, alkene 81, and Togni reagent 82 as substrates catalyzed by 2,4,6-trimethylpyridine (TMP). The EDA complex formed by electron donor TMP and electron acceptor Togni reagent 82 facilitated electron transfer, yielding trifluoromethyl radical to initiate the subsequent reaction (Scheme 28). On account of a wide range of substrates and functional group compatibility, this protocol can be exploited to assemble various β-trifluoromethylated alkynes by three-component reaction without transition-metal catalysis.


Scheme 28: Synthesis of trifluoromethyl-substituted alkynyl product 84 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2018, Xu and colleagues [48] proposed the dearomatization of β-naphthol promoted by visible light via intermolecular charge transfer (Scheme 29). In this method, β-naphthol anion 87 (β-naphthol 85 formed in the presence of base) is employed as electron donor to form EDA complex with electron acceptor perfluoroalkyl iodide 28. Single-electron transfer occurs under white-light irradiation, leading to an electron-deficient fluoroalkyl radical. Thereafter, fluoroalkyl radical is captured by 87, affording radical 88 that gives rise to radical intermediate 89 by uptake of iodine. Finally, the dealkylation product 86 is given by removing iodide anion (Scheme 30). Various β-naphthols with different substituents in the 1- and 3-positions were tolerated, providing the corresponding products with excellent yield.


Scheme 29: Synthesis of dearomatized fluoroalkylation product 86 initiated by an EDA complex.


Scheme 30: Mechanism of the synthesis of dearomatized fluoroalkylation product 86.

In 2018, Chen and colleagues [18] reported a method to realize C(sp3)–H allylation by generating aryl carboxyl radical from EDA complex based on previous work in 2017 [21]. The reaction is initiated by the formation of EDA complex between electron acceptor N-acyloxyphthalimide 90 and electron donor HE 79, completing regio- and chemoselective C(sp3)–H allylation or olefin bifunctionalization (Scheme 31).


Scheme 31: Synthesis of C(sp3)–H allylation product 91 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2018, Tang and Studer [32] found a bifunctional group reaction of perfluoroalkylation and β-alkenylation by a perfluoroalkyl radical. Perfluoroalkylation product 93 was synthesized by utilizing (E)-3-methyl-1-phenylhept-1,6-dien-3-ol (92) and perfluorobutyl iodide (28) as substrates and potassium phosphate and DABCO as additives at 50 °C and under irradiation with light (Scheme 32). The reaction is compatible with phenyl substituents with high steric hindrance, indicating that steric effects of the aryl moiety in the migrating styrenyl group do not play a major role.


Scheme 32: Synthesis of perfluoroalkylation product 93 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2018, You and colleagues [19] reported the discovery of an EDA complex formed by indole derivative 94 and Umemoto reagent 20, which provided the trifluoromethyl-substituted spirocyclic indolene 95 with stereoisomeric center in good yield (up to 90%) under blue-light irradiation (Scheme 33). A variety of groups have been tolerated at the C2 position of indole, including phenyl groups with electron-donating or electron-withdrawing substituents, as well as the alkyl moiety. To further investigate the practicability of this approach, 95 was synthesized smoothly on the gram scale with a yield of 70%.


Scheme 33: Synthesis of spirocyclic indolene derivative 95 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2019, Czekelius and colleagues [43] found that the perfluoroalkylation of unactivated olefins can be realized with phosphine catalyst and perfluorobutyl iodide (28) under visible-light irradiation. The EDA complex formed by perfluorobutyl iodide (28) and phosphine catalyst induced SET, affording a perfluoroalkyl radical, and then perfluoroalkylation product 97 was yielded by addition of perfluoroalkyl radical with olefin 96 (Scheme 34). Upon the termination of the reaction, the desired product can be given by removing the solvent and precipitating the catalyst. The comparison experiments and electronic absorption spectra showed that the efficiency of the catalyst was related to enhancement of selective absorption, considering the use of a visible-light source.


Scheme 34: Synthesis of perfluoroalkylation product 97 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2019, Glorius and colleagues [11] proposed a method of employing an EDA complex formed by indole derivative 98 and the Katritzky salt 99 as well as morpholine as organic base to obtain alkylated indole derivatives 100 under blue-light irradiation (Scheme 35). Given the UV–vis spectra of the reaction mixture and its components, there was no evidence of the formation of a ternary EDA complex between Katritzky salt 99, 98, and morpholine. Moreover, the TDDFT calculation showed that electron transfer took place in complex 101 under visible-light excitation. Hence, it can be inferred that radical-chain propagation was initiated by a small amount of radicals that emerged from excited complex 101. The C–N bond in dissociated radical 103 is irreversibly broken, along with the appearance of radical 104. Subsequently, alkyl radical 104 is captured by indole 98, giving benzyl radical 105. The alkylated indole derivative 100 and morpholine salts are provided via proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) with EDA complex 102 formed by morpholine and 99 (Scheme 36). As a rare example of EDA photochemistry, two kinds of EDA complexes were involved in this approach, explaining the reason why the yield increased significantly when morpholine was employed as an organic base additive, which was exploited in the screening stage of the reaction conditions.


Scheme 35: Synthesis of alkylated indole derivative 100 initiated by an EDA complex.


Scheme 36: Mechanism of the synthesis of alkylated indole derivative 100.

In 2019, Xia and colleagues [46] reported that the EDA complex formed by aryl halide 106 and oxindole 107 under alkaline conditions allowed single-electron transfer under irradiation with light, eventually affording arylated oxidized indole product 108 (Scheme 37). This reaction provides an effective method to construct various 3-arylindoles with medicinal value at ambient temperature, which has a wide range of substrates, including various (hetero)aryl halides and substituted oxindoles.


Scheme 37: Synthesis of arylated oxidized indole derivative 108 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2019, Gilmour and colleagues [12] transformed the classical Stetter reaction into a radical approach, solving the long-standing problem of chemical selectivity to convert α,β-unsaturated aldehydes selectively into 4-ketoaldehydes (Scheme 38). The imine salt (electron acceptor) that forms EDA complex 112 with electron donor α-keto acid 109 is synthesized by secondary amine catalyst and α,β-unsaturated aldehyde 110. Compound 112 turns to excited state 112* under irradiation with light. Then, radical intermediate 113 is afforded via intermolecular electron transfer, followed by removing one molecule of carbon dioxide to give radical intermediate 114. Species 115 is formed through radical coupling in 114, providing the target product 111 with the release of the secondary amine catalyst (Scheme 39).


Scheme 38: Synthesis of 4-ketoaldehyde derivative 111 initiated by an EDA complex.


Scheme 39: Mechanism of the synthesis of 4-ketoaldehyde derivative 111.

In 2019, Kappe and colleagues [36] reported a method to complete perfluoroalkylation of olefins under visible light in flow. Perfluoroalkylated olefin 118 was prepared by employing olefin 116 and perfluoroalkyl iodides 117 as substrates as well as triethylamine as additive at 20 °C and under 405 nm irradiation (Scheme 40). A standard residence time of 5 min was required for the full conversion via the EDA complex that formed by alkene and perfluoroalkyl iodide in flow, while longer residence times were requisite for less reactive alkenes. Moreover, the yield of this reaction can reach 7.6 g ⋅ h−1 on a gram scale, indicating that the flow step is promising in photochemistry.


Scheme 40: Synthesis of perfluoroalkylated olefin 118 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2019, Aggarwal and colleagues [38] employed Katritzky salt 119 as electron acceptor and HE 79 as electron donor to form an EDA complex, providing the corresponding alkyl radical that could react with olefin 120 with an electron-withdrawing group to give alkylation product 121 under irradiation with light (Scheme 41). The reaction is compatible with various substrates, including alkenes, secondary alkylpyridinium ions, benzylic pyridinium ions, and primary alkylpyridinium ions, which can be considered an effective method for the generation of alkyl radicals without catalyst.


Scheme 41: Synthesis of alkylation product 121 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2019, Yu and Zhang [15] reported a radical acylation reaction initiated by an EDA complex promoted by visible light. Imine 122 was employed as electron acceptor with α-keto acid 109 as electron donor to form the EDA complex, affording acylation product 123 under blue-light irradiation (Scheme 42). The quantum yield of the reaction was determined to be 0.08, suggesting that the reaction proceeded via radical coupling rather than a radical propagation. Moreover, the reaction was compatible with amides, cyanides, esters, ethers, halides, and heterocycles, and various α-aminoketones (32 examples) can be yielded in 90% isolated yield. According to the author, the EDA complex had a six-membered-ring transient state, and the imine also acted as an organic base (abstracting proton from α-keto acid), proving that electron transfer is accompanied by proton transfer in the process (Scheme 43).


Scheme 42: Synthesis of acylation product 123 initiated by an EDA complex.


Scheme 43: Mechanism of the synthesis of acylation product 123.

In 2020, Stephenson and colleagues [14] employed 2-methoxynaphthalene (124) and acylated ethyl isonicotinate N-oxide obtained from 125 and trifluoroacetic acid anhydride to form EDA complexes for the preparation of trifluoromethylated product 126 (Scheme 44). As a rare example of EDA photochemistry in the catalytic system, only a catalytic equivalent of the electron donor was employed in this approach. Further experiments showed that the addition of inorganic salts, calcium chloride and lithium chloride, could increase the absorption of EDA complex in the visible-light region.


Scheme 44: Synthesis of trifluoromethylation product 126 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2020, Xu and colleagues [39] proposed a visible-light-promoted alkylation reaction using Katritzky salts such as 128 and glycine derivative 127 (or glycine segments in peptides) initiated by an EDA complex. This successfully realized the simple synthesis of unnatural α-amino acids 129 and precise alkylation modification of peptides in the later stage (Scheme 45). Even in the presence of other amino acid residues, this protocol has excellent regio- and chemoselectivity, providing a sequence of novel corresponding dipeptides with good yield.


Scheme 45: Synthesis of unnatural α-amino acid 129 initiated by an EDA complex.

The construction of C–S bonds

C–S bonds are commonly present in amino acids, proteins, glycosides, nucleic acids, and other biological macromolecules. In recent years, photocatalyst- and transition-metal strategies have been employed to construct C–S bonds [66-69]. The C–S bond synthesis via EDA-complex pathways has the advantages of mild reaction conditions and a high tolerance to functional groups, which can be exploited for artificial syntheses of biological macromolecules.

In 2017, Miyake and colleagues [54] designed a type of C–S cross-coupling reaction initiated by an EDA complex promoted by visible light. In this approach, halogenated aromatic 130 was employed as electron acceptor with thiophenol (131) as electron donor to form an EDA complex. Light-promoted intermolecular electron transfer took place to give corresponding radicals, respectively, in the presence of base, and then cross-coupling between radicals was carried out, affording thioether derivative 132 (Scheme 46). It has been proved by UV–vis spectroscopy and TDDFT calculations that the EDA complex was formed between an electron-rich mercaptan anion and electron-deficient aryl halides. Most importantly, this approach can be successfully applied to the gram scale, providing a step towards assorted aryl sulfide structural units with medicinal value.


Scheme 46: Synthesis of thioether derivative 132 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2019, Yang and colleagues [52] developed a method for preparing S-aryl dithiocarbamates 135 by a multicomponent reaction of an EDA complex under visible-light irradiation (Scheme 47). A number of aryl halides reacted smoothly, providing moderate to good yields for analogous S-aryl dithiocarbamates. To further demonstrate the synthetic application of this protocol, a gram scale of 135 has been tested, giving a yield of 72%. By constructing C–N- and C–S bonds simultaneously in one step without any transition-metal catalyst, ligand, or photocatalyst, this method possesses a splendid application prospect.


Scheme 47: Synthesis of S-aryl dithiocarbamate product 135 initiated by an EDA complex.

The reaction mechanism is as follows (Scheme 48): Firstly, carbon disulfide combines with N-methylaniline (134) in the presence of Cs2CO3 to form thiolate 136. Thiolate 136 is employed as electron donor to generate EDA complex 137 with halogenated electron-acceptor aromatics 133, and then electron transfer occurs, affording intermediate 138. Finally, radical coupling gives rise to S-aryl dithiocarbamate product 135.


Scheme 48: Mechanism of the synthesis of S-aryl dithiocarbamate product 135.

In 2019, Liao and colleagues [13] utilized Katritzky salt 139 and thiobenzoic acid (140) to form an EDA complex, providing thioether derivative 141 with DIPEA as an organic base additive (Scheme 49). This reaction offers a novel and simple approach for the synthesis of α-mercapto acid derivatives under mild reaction conditions and demonstrates strong compatibility to the functional group. In addition, a gram-scale reaction also gives the desired thioether product in a yield of 99%.


Scheme 49: Synthesis of thioether product 141 initiated by an EDA complex.

The construction of C–B bonds

The C–B bond can be converted into a wide range of other functional groups by the conversion of alkyl borane [70-72]. Hence, it has become imperative to pursue more efficient syntheses for constructing C–B bonds. In recent years, the construction of C–B bonds via EDA complexes has attracted more chemists' attention.

In 2017, Glorius and colleagues [51] discovered a visible-light-induced decarboxylated borate of arylcarboxylic acid initiated by an EDA complex. First, the N-hydroxyphthalimide (NHPI) ester 142 is excited to electron acceptor 142* through visible-light intersystem crossing (ISC); diborate 143 combining with pyridine results in electron donor 145. Upon the formation of the EDA complex between 145 and 142*, electron transfer occurs, giving radical 146 and radical cation 147, respectively. Finally, radical 146 undergoes decarboxylation to afford an aryl radical and then combines with radical cation 147, yielding product 144 (Scheme 50). It should be noted that only when NHPI is firstly activated can it turn into an electron acceptor, and thus further combines with the electron donor to form an EDA complex, mainly due to the fact that the electron acceptor in an excited state allows for stronger oxidation, to integrate with the electron donor.


Scheme 50: Mechanism of the synthesis of borate product 144.

In 2018, Glorius and colleagues [16] reported a method for the preparation of boron-substituted product 148 by employing Katritzky salt 119 as electron acceptor as well as the complex formed by bis(catecholato)diboron (B2cat2) and solvent DMA as electron donor to afford an EDA complex (Scheme 51). This approach can effectively convert primary-, benzyl-, and secondary amines into corresponding borated products, with only a coordinating solvent, DMA. Furthermore, functionalization of natural products and drug molecules has been accomplished smoothly with excellent yields.


Scheme 51: Synthesis of boronation product 148 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2018, Aggarwal and colleagues [17] proposed a method for preparing alkyl borate derivative 150 by employing Katritzky alkylpyridinium salt 149 and B2cat2 as substrates as well as DMA as coordination solvent under blue-light irradiation, followed by subsequent reaction with pinacol to afford boration product 151 (Scheme 52). A number of secondary alkylamines, even those that have carbamate- or phthalimide-protected amines, have been efficiently transformed to suitable pinacol boronic esters. This simple operation without transition-metal catalysis will be widely promoted in the synthesis of important boron-containing molecules in medicine and biology.


Scheme 52: Synthesis of boration product 151 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2019, Aggarwal and colleagues [55] proposed that the EDA complex was formed by 2-iodophenyl thiocarbonate 152, bis(catecholato)diboron, and triethylamine, which afforded boronic acid ester derivative 153 under blue-light irradiation. Simultaneously, pinacol boronic acid ester derivative 154 can be yielded by subsequent processing (Scheme 53). The protocol reveals a high functional-group tolerance that permits the transformation into boronic esters of natural alcohol products with high stereocontrol.


Scheme 53: Synthesis of boronic acid ester derivative 154 initiated by an EDA complex.

The construction of C–N bonds

The development of efficient methods to construct C–N bonds is an essential scheme in organic synthesis due to its widespread presence in pharmaceutical-, agrochemical-, and materials sciences [73-75]. At present, most of the C–N-bonding reactions require transition-metal catalysis, and the reaction conditions are more stringent; however, the EDA-complex pathway proceeds under mild, catalyst-free conditions, promoted by irradiation with visible light.

In 2017, Shirke and Ramaastry [40] proposed an organic catalyzed β-azide reaction of ketene 155 initiated by the EDA complex formed by DABCO and Zhdankin reagent 156 (Scheme 54). A variety of β-azidoketones was conveniently obtained with good to excellent yield with electron-rich as well as electron-poor arenes and heteroarenes. Subsequently, in order to prove the practicability of this approach, 1,2,3-triazoles were assembled by reaction of 157 with alkynes.


Scheme 54: Synthesis of β-azide product 157 initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2019, Bosque and Bach [41] reported that 3-acetoxyquinuclidine (q-OAc) could be utilized as an electron-donor catalyst to form an EDA complex with electron acceptor 158, and then a molecule of carbon dioxide was removed under 455 nm light irradiation, giving decarboxylation product 159 (Scheme 55). It was found that many ester groups can be activated by the structural motif of tetrachlorophthalimide in 158. Significantly, in contrast to most traditional EDA complex approaches that consume the DA pair, the electron-donor catalyst q-OAc in this method could be regenerated.


Scheme 55: Decarboxylation reaction initiated by an EDA complex.

In 2019, Frontera and colleagues [49] obtained target product 162 with blue LEDs irradiation of a solution containing electron-poor N-aryloxyamides 160, indole derivative 161, and carbonate or other multicharge anions in CH3CN (Scheme 56). The corresponding products can be given in good yield by modifying substituents on the amide moiety in 160 or N-substituted indoles. Inorganic-base electron donors formed transient complexes with N-aryloxyamides, driven by noncovalent anion–π interactions, which has been described for the first time in a light-promoted process.


Scheme 56: Synthesis of amidated product 162 initiated by an EDA complex.

The construction of C–P bonds

Many compounds contain phosphorus, which has gained a high degree of interest in materials, agriculture, medical science, and biology [76]. Cases of C–P bond construction employing photoredox [77,78] or photoredox/nickel dual catalysis [79] have been identified in the field of photochemistry. However, here we introduce the methods initiated by EDA complexes for C–P bond construction.

In 2018, Lakhdar and colleagues [44] reported a visible-light-mediated synthesis approach of arylphosphonates initiated by an EDA complex. Diethyl phenylphosphonate (165) was given by exploiting diphenyliodonium trifluoromethanesulfonate (163) as electron acceptor, triethylphosphite (164) as electron donor, potassium carbonate as base, and CH3CN as solvent (Scheme 57). The complex is bound together by weak halogen bonds, in which phosphorus lone-pair electrons interact with σ* orbitals of C–I bonds. A variety of arylphosphonates can be directly afforded by the simple combination of diaryliodonium salts and phosphite esters. In addition, calculations including EPR, NMR, and DFT have been carried out to prove that the reaction mechanism is consistent with inference (Scheme 58).


Scheme 57: Synthesis of diethyl phenylphosphonate 165 initiated by an EDA complex.


Scheme 58: Mechanism of the synthesis of diethyl phenylphosphonate derivative 165.

The construction of C–O bonds and C–H bonds

Although there have been few cases of constructing C–O bonds and C–H bonds via EDA-complex pathways in recent years, we also summarized them in view of their great significance in organic synthesis.

In 2018, Miyake and colleagues [50] found a protocol for the preparation of (Z)-2-iodovinyl phenyl ether 168 by utilizing ethynylbenziodoxol(on)e (EBX) 167 and phenol derivative 166 (Scheme 59). Due to the lack of significant electronic effects of phenol, a variety of phenols, including electron-donor and electron-withdrawing groups, were been converted into corresponding 2-iodovinyl phenyl ethers in moderate to excellent yield with high regio- and stereoselectivities.


Scheme 59: Synthesis of (Z)-2-iodovinyl phenyl ether 168 initiated by an EDA complex.

According to the analysis of the mechanism (Scheme 60), a molecule of phenol anion is first added to the alkyne group of an EBX, forming electron acceptor 169, which causes the destabilization of the C–I bond. Then, electron acceptor 169 forms an EDA complex with phenol anion, along with light-promoted electron transfer occurring. Thereby, the C–I bond and the I–O bond break to afford the final product (Z)-2-iodovinyl phenyl ether 168. The electron acceptor can only be provided by the addition of phenol to the EBXs since an EDA complex cannot be directly formed from the original substrates, which means that the effect of the two-component ratio of the EDA complex must be taken into account.


Scheme 60: Mechanism of the synthesis of (Z)-2-iodovinyl phenyl ether derivative 168.

In 2019, Rathnayake and Weaver, III [37] designed a method of visible-light-promoted EDA-complex-mediated dehalogenation of haloalkanes 170. The dehalogenation product 171 was afforded based on the presence of the EDA complex formed by DIPEA and haloalkanes 170 under blue-light irradiation (Scheme 61). It was worth mentioning that longer reaction times and increased DIPEA loading were required owing to the inactivity of α-bromoketones, esters, and nonactivated sulfones; however, corresponding products could be given in high yield. When the DIPEA molarity was double that of haloalkanes, the highest yield was given. Since a marked yellow color appeared immediately upon mixing substrates, the existence of an EDA complex could be confirmed by UV–vis spectroscopy.


Scheme 61: Dehalogenation reaction initiated by an EDA complex.


In this review, reactions and mechanisms of EDA complexes were discussed from the aspects of cyclization reactions, C–C-, C–S-, C–B-, C–N-, C–P-, C–O-, and C–H bond formations. The absence of transitional-metal catalysts and photosensitizers is the most profound feature of EDA-complex- mediated reactions in most cases. On the other hand, the reaction conditions are mild, and light is utilized as the only external energy source, which is consistent with the theme of green chemistry. However, the comprehension of EDA complexes was established relatively late, mainly owing to the fact that the formation of EDA complexes was regarded as a unique chemical reaction rather than a branch of photochemistry; in addition, for the sake of avoiding BET processes, reactions involving EDA complexes require substrates with corresponding leaving groups, which also significantly limits the development of EDA complexes. In conclusion, although the research on EDA complexes is still in the initial stage, with many challenges to be solved in response, there is no doubt that the future of green chemical synthesis will surely have a very wide prospect for this strategy.


This work was co-supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.21901216), the research project of the Fund of Science and Technology Agency of Chengdu (No. 2019-YF09-00049-SN), the Open Project Program of Irradiation Preservation Technology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Institute of Atomic Energy (No. FZBC2020002), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2018HH0090, 2019YFH0032 and 2019YJ0548), the Key project of Sichuan Traditional Chinese Medicine Administration (2018HJZX024), and the 14th Personalized Experimental Project (GX2020160025).


  1. Mulliken, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 600–608. doi:10.1021/ja01157a151
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Mulliken, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 811–824. doi:10.1021/ja01123a067
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Mulliken, R. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1952, 56, 801–822. doi:10.1021/j150499a001
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Haga, N.; Nakajima, H.; Takayanagi, H.; Tokumaru, K. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5372–5384. doi:10.1021/jo9801824
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Rosokha, S. V.; Kochi, J. K. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 641–653. doi:10.1021/ar700256a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Cao, Z.-Y.; Ghosh, T.; Melchiorre, P. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3274. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05375-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Hu, X.-Q.; Liu, Z.-K.; Hou, Y.-X.; Gao, Y. iScience 2020, 23, 101266. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101266
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Crisenza, G. E. M.; Mazzarella, D.; Melchiorre, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 5461–5476. doi:10.1021/jacs.0c01416
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Wei, Y.; Zhou, Q.-Q.; Tan, F.; Lu, L.-Q.; Xiao, W.-J. Synthesis 2019, 51, 3021–3054. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1611812
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Quint, V.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Lohier, J.-F.; Lalevée, J.; Gaumont, A.-C.; Lakhdar, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 7436–7441. doi:10.1021/jacs.6b04069
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  11. James, M. J.; Strieth-Kalthoff, F.; Sandfort, F.; Klauck, F. J. R.; Wagener, F.; Glorius, F. Chem. – Eur. J. 2019, 25, 8240–8244. doi:10.1002/chem.201901397
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  12. Morack, T.; Mück‐Lichtenfeld, C.; Gilmour, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 1208–1212. doi:10.1002/anie.201809601
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  13. Yang, M.; Cao, T.; Xu, T.; Liao, S. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 8673–8678. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.9b03284
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  14. McClain, E. J.; Monos, T. M.; Mori, M.; Beatty, J. W.; Stephenson, C. R. J. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 12636–12641. doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c03837
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  15. Zhang, H.-H.; Yu, S. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 3711–3715. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.9b01169
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  16. Sandfort, F.; Strieth-Kalthoff, F.; Klauck, F. J. R.; James, M. J.; Glorius, F. Chem. – Eur. J. 2018, 24, 17210–17214. doi:10.1002/chem.201804246
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  17. Wu, J.; He, L.; Noble, A.; Aggarwal, V. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 10700–10704. doi:10.1021/jacs.8b07103
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  18. Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, D.; Chen, Y. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 3296–3299. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01172
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  19. Zhu, M.; Zhou, K.; Zhang, X.; You, S.-L. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 4379–4383. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01899
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  20. Li, J.; Zhang, P.; Jiang, M.; Yang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Fu, H. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 1994–1997. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00533
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  21. Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Xu, R.; Chen, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 12619–12623. doi:10.1002/anie.201707171
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  22. Sun, J.; He, Y.; An, X.-D.; Zhang, X.; Yu, L.; Yu, S. Org. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 977–981. doi:10.1039/c7qo00992e
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  23. Liu, Y.; Chen, X.-L.; Sun, K.; Li, X.-Y.; Zeng, F.-L.; Liu, X.-C.; Qu, L.-B.; Zhao, Y.-F.; Yu, B. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 4019–4024. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.9b01175
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  24. Wang, R.; Wang, L.; Xu, Q.; Ren, B.-Y.; Liang, F. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 3072–3076. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.9b00655
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  25. Yang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Xie, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 1638–1643. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00234
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  26. Ho, H. E.; Pagano, A.; Rossi-Ashton, J. A.; Donald, J. R.; Epton, R. G.; Churchill, J. C.; James, M. J.; O'Brien, P.; Taylor, R. J. K.; Unsworth, W. P. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 1353–1360. doi:10.1039/c9sc05311e
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  27. Cheng, Y.; Yuan, X.; Ma, J.; Yu, S. Chem. – Eur. J. 2015, 21, 8355–8359. doi:10.1002/chem.201500896
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  28. Kandukuri, S. R.; Bahamonde, A.; Chatterjee, I.; Jurberg, I. D.; Escudero-Adán, E. C.; Melchiorre, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1485–1489. doi:10.1002/anie.201409529
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  29. Cheng, Y.; Yu, S. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 2962–2965. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.6b01301
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  30. Jiang, H.; He, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Yu, S. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 1240–1243. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00337
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  31. Hsu, C.-W.; Sundén, H. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 2051–2054. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.8b00597
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  32. Tang, X.; Studer, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 814–817. doi:10.1002/anie.201710397
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  33. Sun, X.; Wang, W.; Li, Y.; Ma, J.; Yu, S. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 4638–4641. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.6b02271
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  34. Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, G.-X.; He, G.; Chen, G. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 1442–1445. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00375
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  35. Han, Y.; Jin, Y.; Jiang, M.; Yang, H.; Fu, H. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 1799–1803. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.9b00372
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  36. Rosso, C.; Williams, J. D.; Filippini, G.; Prato, M.; Kappe, C. O. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 5341–5345. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.9b01992
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  37. Rathnayake, M. D.; Weaver, J. D., III. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 9681–9687. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.9b03848
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  38. Wu, J.; Grant, P. S.; Li, X.; Noble, A.; Aggarwal, V. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 5697–5701. doi:10.1002/anie.201814452
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  39. Wang, C.; Qi, R.; Xue, H.; Shen, Y.; Chang, M.; Chen, Y.; Wang, R.; Xu, Z. Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 7531–7536. doi:10.1002/ange.201914555
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  40. Shirke, R. P.; Ramasastry, S. S. V. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 5482–5485. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.7b02861
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  41. Bosque, I.; Bach, T. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 9103–9109. doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b01039
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  42. Marzo, L.; Wang, S.; König, B. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 5976–5979. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.7b03001
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  43. Helmecke, L.; Spittler, M.; Baumgarten, K.; Czekelius, C. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 7823–7827. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.9b02812
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  44. Lecroq, W.; Bazille, P.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Breugst, M.; Lalevée, J.; Gaumont, A.-C.; Lakhdar, S. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 4164–4167. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01379
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  45. Woźniak, Ł.; Murphy, J. J.; Melchiorre, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5678–5681. doi:10.1021/jacs.5b03243
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  46. Liang, K.; Li, N.; Zhang, Y.; Li, T.; Xia, C. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 3049–3053. doi:10.1039/c8sc05170d
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  47. Liu, Y.-Y.; Yu, X.-Y.; Chen, J.-R.; Qiao, M.-M.; Qi, X.; Shi, D.-Q.; Xiao, W.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 9527–9531. doi:10.1002/anie.201704690
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  48. Guo, Q.; Wang, M.; Liu, H.; Wang, R.; Xu, Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 4747–4751. doi:10.1002/anie.201800767
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  49. Buglioni, L.; Mastandrea, M. M.; Frontera, A.; Pericàs, M. A. Chem. – Eur. J. 2019, 25, 11785–11790. doi:10.1002/chem.201903055
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  50. Liu, B.; Lim, C.-H.; Miyake, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 12829–12835. doi:10.1021/jacs.8b05870
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  51. Candish, L.; Teders, M.; Glorius, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 7440–7443. doi:10.1021/jacs.7b03127
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  52. Li, G.; Yan, Q.; Gan, Z.; Li, Q.; Dou, X.; Yang, D. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 7938–7942. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.9b02921
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  53. Rigotti, T.; Mas-Ballesté, R.; Alemán, J. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 5335–5346. doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c01413
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  54. Liu, B.; Lim, C.-H.; Miyake, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 13616–13619. doi:10.1021/jacs.7b07390
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  55. Wu, J.; Bär, R. M.; Guo, L.; Noble, A.; Aggarwal, V. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 18830–18834. doi:10.1002/anie.201910051
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  56. Wang, R.; Guan, W.; Han, Z.-B.; Liang, F.; Suga, T.; Bi, X.; Nishide, H. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 2358–2361. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00894
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  57. Zhou, S.; Song, T.; Chen, H.; Liu, Z.; Shen, H.; Li, C. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 698–701. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03870
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  58. Li, Y.; Mao, R.; Wu, J. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 4472–4475. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.7b02010
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  59. Kärkäs, M. D.; Porco, J. A., Jr.; Stephenson, C. R. J. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 9683–9747. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00760
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  60. Wang, N.; Gu, Q.-S.; Li, Z.-L.; Li, Z.; Guo, Y.-L.; Guo, Z.; Liu, X.-Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 14225–14229. doi:10.1002/anie.201808890
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  61. Zhao, Y.; Chen, J.-R.; Xiao, W.-J. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 224–227. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.7b03588
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  62. Metrangolo, P.; Meyer, F.; Pilati, T.; Resnati, G.; Terraneo, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6114–6127. doi:10.1002/anie.200800128
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  63. Davies, A. V.; Fitzpatrick, K. P.; Betori, R. C.; Scheidt, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 9143–9148. doi:10.1002/anie.202001824
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  64. Aukland, M. H.; Šiaučiulis, M.; West, A.; Perry, G. J. P.; Procter, D. J. Nat. Catal. 2020, 3, 163–169. doi:10.1038/s41929-019-0415-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  65. Kawasaki, T.; Ishida, N.; Murakami, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 3366–3370. doi:10.1021/jacs.9b13920
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  66. Oderinde, M. S.; Frenette, M.; Robbins, D. W.; Aquila, B.; Johannes, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1760–1763. doi:10.1021/jacs.5b11244
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  67. Jouffroy, M.; Kelly, C. B.; Molander, G. A. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 876–879. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.6b00208
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  68. Jiang, M.; Li, H.; Yang, H.; Fu, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 874–879. doi:10.1002/anie.201610414
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  69. Hosseinian, A.; Sadeghi, Y. J.; Ebrahimiasl, S.; Monfared, A.; Vessally, E. J. Sulfur Chem. 2019, 40, 565–585. doi:10.1080/17415993.2019.1598410
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  70. Sandford, C.; Aggarwal, V. K. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 5481–5494. doi:10.1039/c7cc01254c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  71. Yan, G.; Huang, D.; Wu, X. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 1040–1053. doi:10.1002/adsc.201701030
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  72. Cheng, Y.; Mück-Lichtenfeld, C.; Studer, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 6221–6225. doi:10.1021/jacs.8b03333
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  73. Shin, K.; Kim, H.; Chang, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 1040–1052. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00020
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  74. Greulich, T. W.; Daniliuc, C. G.; Studer, A. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 254–257. doi:10.1021/ol503338b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  75. Guo, W.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 4085–4089. doi:10.1002/anie.202014518
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  76. Cai, B.-G.; Xuan, J.; Xiao, W.-J. Sci. Bull. 2019, 64, 337–350. doi:10.1016/j.scib.2019.02.002
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  77. Shaikh, R. S.; Düsel, S. J. S.; König, B. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 8410–8414. doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b02591
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  78. Shaikh, R. S.; Ghosh, I.; König, B. Chem. – Eur. J. 2017, 23, 12120–12124. doi:10.1002/chem.201701283
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  79. Xuan, J.; Zeng, T.-T.; Chen, J.-R.; Lu, L.-Q.; Xiao, W.-J. Chem. – Eur. J. 2015, 21, 4962–4965. doi:10.1002/chem.201500227
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities