Bis(oxazolines) based on glycopyranosides – steric, configurational and conformational influences on stereoselectivity

  1. and
Institute of Organic Chemistry, Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz University of Hannover, Schneiderberg 1B, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
  1. Corresponding author email
Guest Editor: T. K. Lindhorst
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, No. 23. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.6.23
Received 08 Dec 2009, Accepted 18 Feb 2010, Published 04 Mar 2010
Full Research Paper
cc by logo

Abstract

In previous studies we found that the asymmetric induction of bis(oxazolines) based on D-glucosamine strongly depended on the steric demand of the 3-O-substituents. To further probe the impact of the 3-position of the pyranose scaffold, we prepared 3-epimerised and 3-defunctionalised versions of these ligands as well as a 3-O-formyl derivative. Application of these new ligands in asymmetric cyclopropanation revealed strong steric and configurational effects of position 3 on asymmetric induction, further dramatic effects of the pyranose conformation were also observed.

Introduction

The design and optimisation of chiral ligands for metal catalysed transformations is of crucial importance for stereoselective synthesis and is therefore an active field of research. In this context, carbohydrates are interesting, even if comparatively rarely used as starting materials for the preparation of new chiral ligand structures. Today, 30 years after the first reports on carbohydrate-based ligands [1-4], the potential of saccharide compounds in this area is more and more appreciated [5-12].

Chiral bis(oxazolines) (Box) are very efficient ligands for many asymmetric transformations [13,14]. Even though N-acylated derivatives of D-glucosamine easily form bicyclic carbohydrate oxazolines, until recently only a few examples of mono(oxazoline) ligands [15-17] and the corresponding bis(oxazolines) [18] based on this monosaccharide have appeared in the literature. In the course of our work we have introduced new glucosamine-derived bis(oxazolines) 2ac with uniform protective groups on all oxygen functions [19-21] and derivatives 3af with cyclic 4,6-O-benzylidene protection as well as various other 3-O-substituents that differ in steric demand and electronic nature [20,21].

These ligands were subsequently employed in the asymmetric cyclopropanation [22,23] of styrene (4) with ethyl diazoacetate (5). Our results revealed a strong dependence of the enantioselectivity on both the steric bulk and electronic nature of the O-substituents in ligands 2ac and 3af. Furthermore, the conformation of the pyranose scaffold – a twist conformation for ligands 2ac without 4,6-O-benzylidene protection (Scheme 1, conformer A) and a partially chair-like conformation for ligands 3af (Scheme 1, conformer B) fixed by the annulated 4,6-O-benzylidene group – has a direct impact on the enantioselectivity of the reaction. For ligands 3af with cyclic protection, a decrease in the bulk of the 3-O-residues led to an improvement in stereoselectivity, while the opposite trend was observed for counterparts 2ac with acyclic 4,6-O-protection. Moreover, ester modified ligands 2a, 2b and 3ac led to higher stereoselectivity than the corresponding ether-modified compounds 2c and 3df. The best results were obtained with 3-O-Ac glucoBox 3a that combines a small 3-O-acyl residue with cyclic 4,6-O-protection, and with bulky ligand Piv glucoBox (2b) without any cyclic protection. These findings are summarised in Scheme 1.

[1860-5397-6-23-i1]

Scheme 1: New glucosamine-based bis(oxazoline) ligands with their pyranose conformation and application in asymmetric cyclopropanation.

Because of the strong impact of the pyranose position 3 in ligands 3af on the stereoselectivity, we became interested in elucidating the influence of the stereochemistry at this position by both 3-epimerisation and 3-defunctionalisation. Inversion of the configuration at position 3 to give an allo-configured ligand scaffold, will bring the 3-O-substituent into a syn-relationship with the oxazoline nitrogen atom and therefore into very close proximity to a coordinated metal centre (Figure 1, I). Deoxygenation of the 3-postion on the other hand will lead to a ligand with comparably little steric shielding of metal centres coordinated by the oxazoline nitrogen atoms (Figure 1, II). As the stereoselectivity of the model reaction for ligands 3af improved with decreasing steric demand of the 3-O-substituent and since the best results were obtained with acyl-modified ligands, we also set out to prepare a corresponding ligand with a formyl group as the smallest possible acyl residue at the 3-O-position. In this paper we describe the synthesis of new 3-epimerised and 3-deoxygenated carbohydrate bis(oxazolines), the preparation of a 3-O-formate analogue of ligands 3 as well as the testing of these new ligands in stereoselective cyclopropanation.

[1860-5397-6-23-1]

Figure 1: Planned modifications at pyranose position 3 of carbohydrate bis(oxazolines).

Results and Discussion

The synthesis of all new ligands started from the known thioglucoside 7 [24] which was also employed as key intermediate for the preparation of ligands 3af [20,21] and is accessible from D-glucosamine in 5 steps and 57% overall yield. To prepare an allo-configured precursor for ligand synthesis, we decided first to use a previously described epimerisation sequence for 7 featuring Swern oxidation and subsequent reduction with sodium borohydride [25]. In our hands this method led to an inseparable product mixture in the second step however, on switching to L-selectride for the stereoselective reduction [26], the allosamine derived thioglycoside 10 was obtained in good overall yield. For an alternative route, 7 was transformed into the 3-O-triflate 9 and then subjected to nucleophilic displacement with sodium nitrite in the presence of 15-crown-5 [27,28] to afford 10 in similar yields as the oxidation-reduction sequence (Scheme 2). After deprotection of the phthalimide (phthN) [29], the free amine 11 was transformed into the 4,6-O-benzylidene protected ligand by our standard protocol for the preparation of carbohydrate bis(oxazoline) ligands [20,21]: Formation of bis(amide) 12 with dimethylmalonyl chloride, 3-O-acetylation and subsequent activation of the thioethyl moieties of 13 with NIS [30] for the double cyclisation step, led to benzylidene protected ligand 3-O-Ac alloBox 14 in excellent yield. As noted previously, the presence of a 4,6-O-benzylidene group has a pronounced influence on the conformation adopted by the pyranose scaffold in gluco-configured ligands (Scheme 1, conformers A and B), which in turn has a direct influence on the stereoselectivity in the model reaction. In order to ascertain if a similar conformative effect is also in operation for allo-configured bis(oxazolines), we prepared ligand Ac alloBox 16 with acyclic 4,6-O-protection by the removal of the benzylidene groups from 12 under acidic conditions and per-O-acetylation in a one-pot reaction followed by NIS-mediated cyclisation of resulting bis(amide) 15.

[1860-5397-6-23-i2]

Scheme 2: Synthesis of allo-configured bis(oxazolines) 3-O-Ac alloBox (14) and Ac alloBox (16) from thioglucoside 7 as the key intermediate.

For the preparation of 3-deoxygenated ligands, we planned a defunctionalisation of the key intermediate 7. Surprisingly, a thorough search of the literature revealed only one example of the 3-deoxygenation of a glucosamine-derived thioglycoside, reported by Herdewijn et al. in 2006 [31]. Because the Barton–McCombie deoxygenation [32] failed on their N-Troc protected thio aminoglucoside under various conditions, Herdewijn et al. used a sequence via a 3-iodide derivative. To avoid the rather complicated preparation of a 3-iodo derivative, we tried the Barton–McCombie reaction on our phthalimido protected precursor 7 (Scheme 3). Introduction of the 3-xanthogenate with carbon disulfide and methyl iodide yielded 17, which was cleanly deoxygenated in high yield by tributyltin hydride under standard conditions [32,33]. From the resulting compound 18, the ligands 3-deoxy glucoBox 21 with benzylidene groups and Ac 3-deoxy glucoBox 23 with acyclic 4,6-O-protection were prepared in high overall yields (Scheme 3).

[1860-5397-6-23-i3]

Scheme 3: Preparation of ligands 3-deoxy glucoBox (21) and Ac 3-deoxy glucoBox (23) from key intermediate 7.

The 3-O-formate analogue of gluco-configured ligands 3 was obtained by treatment of bis(amide) 24 [20,21] with formyl acetate [34] to yield 25 which was then cyclised to the desired ligand 26 with NIS (Scheme 4).

[1860-5397-6-23-i4]

Scheme 4: Preparation of ligand 3-O-Formyl glucoBox (26) from bis(amide) 24.

The five new ligands 14, 16, 21, 23 and 26 were now employed in the copper(I) catalysed asymmetric cyclopropanation of styrene (4) with diazoacetate (5) under known conditions [19,21,22] (Table 1). All ligands led to formation of the products trans 6 and cis 6 in good to excellent yields and the trans/cis ratio was in the typical range (around 70:30) obtained with bis(oxazoline) ligands [22]. However, the enantioselectivities differed dramatically for the new ligands and revealed once again the strong influence of position 3 and the pyranose conformation on the efficiency of the asymmetric induction. The best results were obtained with 3-O-formyl glucoBox 26 which gave trans 6 and cis 6 in 95% ee and 94% ee respectively (Table 1, entry 5).

Table 1: Cyclopropanations with allo-configured ligands 14 and 16, 3-deoxygenated ligands 21 and 23 and 3-O-formylated, gluco-configured ligand 26.

[Graphic 1]
Entry Ligand Yield [%]a trans/cisb ee trans [%]b ee cis [%]b
1 3-O-Ac alloBox (14) 75 66:34 rac. rac.
2 Ac alloBox (16) 79 70:30 71 87
3 3-deoxy glucoBox (21) 86 69:31 rac. rac.
4 Ac 3-deoxy glucoBox (23) 75 74:26 78 72
5 3-O-formyl glucoBox (26) 95 71:29 95 94

aIsolated yield after chromatography.
bDetermined by GC on a chiral stationary phase.

Figure 2 gives a summary of the results obtained with the new ligands as well as a comparison with the previously reported ligands 2a and 3a. Both, benzylidene-protected ligands 3-O-Ac alloBox 14 and 3-deoxy glucoBox 21 gave only racemic products while their counterparts Ac alloBox 16 and Ac 3-Deoxy glucoBox 23 lacking cyclic 4,6-O-protection led to substantial asymmetric induction. This demonstrates that the dramatic conformational effect of the pyranose scaffold on stereoselectivity, which was first observed for gluco-configured ligands 2 and 3, is also in operation in allo- and 3-deoxy gluco-ligands. However, while benzylidene protection in 3-O-Ac glucoBox 3a led to improved asymmetric induction in comparison to ligand Ac glucoBox 2a lacking cyclic protection, the opposite was observed for the allo- and 3-deoxy-ligands. The strong influence of the configuration of pyranose position 3 on stereoselectivity becomes apparent by a comparison of ligand 3-O-Ac glucoBox 3a to its 3-epimerised and 3-defunctionalised counterparts 14 and 21: Both modifications, inversion of the configuration in allo-ligand 14 and 3-defunctionalisation in 21 result in a complete loss of stereoselectivity in the model reaction, whilst 3-O-Ac glucoBox 3a provides the products in 93% ee and 82% ee respectively. Finally, gluco-configured ligand 26 with a 3-O-formyl residue led to higher stereoselectivities (95% ee and 94% ee for trans 6 and cis 6 respectively) than 3-O-acetylated ligand 3a. This confirms the trend we initially observed for gluco-configured ligands. A decrease in steric bulk of 3-O-acyl substituents results in improved asymmetric induction of the ligand in the cyclopropanation reaction: ee for 3-O-Piv 3c < 3-O-Bz 3b < 3-O-Ac 3a < 3-O-Formyl 26. Thus, of all carbohydrate-derived bis(oxazolines) prepared by us, ligand 26 led to the best enantioselectivities for cyclopropanes trans 6 and cis 6.

[1860-5397-6-23-2]

Figure 2: Impact of structural ligand modifications on the stereoselectivity of cyclopropanations.

Conclusion

We have prepared new derivatives of gluco-configured bis(oxazoline) ligands 2 and 3 with 3-epimerisation or 3-defunctionalisation in the pyranose scaffold. Application in stereoselective cyclopropanation as a model reaction highlighted the strong impact of modifications at the pyranose position 3 on the asymmetric induction exerted by carbohydrate-based ligands. Furthermore, the previously observed conformational effect of cyclic 4,6-O-benzylidene protection on stereoselectivity is also in operation in the new derivatives. Introduction of a 3-O-formate in glucoBox ligands led to improved stereoselectivities compared to the corresponding 3-O-acetate. This underlines our previous findings that the best results for gluco-configured ligands are obtained with small acyl-based 3-O-substitutents. The observed steric, configurational and conformational effects are as yet not fully understood and investigations to elucidate their origins are currently under way.

Supporting Information

Supporting information contains full experimental details for the preparation of all new ligands and general conditions for cyclopropanations using glucoBox ligands and copper(I) triflate.

Supporting Information File 1: Experimental details.
Format: PDF Size: 168.7 KB Download

Acknowledgements

We thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Volkswagen Foundation for generous financial support.

References

  1. Cullen, W. R.; Sugi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 19, 1635–1636. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)94626-X
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Jackson, R.; Thompson, D. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1978, 159, C29–C31. doi:10.1016/S0022-328X(00)92235-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Selke, R. React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 1979, 10, 135–138. doi:10.1007/BF02075980
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Sinou, D.; Descotes, G. React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 1980, 14, 463–466. doi:10.1007/BF02061353
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Hale, K. J. Monosaccharides: Use in synthesis as chiral templates. In Second Supplement to the Second Edition of Rodd's Chemistry of Carbon Compounds; Sainsbury, M., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993; Vol. 1E/F/G, pp 273–313.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Steinborn, D.; Junicke, H. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 4283–4318. doi:10.1021/cr9903050
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Diéguez, M.; Pàmies, O.; Claver, C. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 3189–3215. doi:10.1021/cr0306889
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Diéguez, M.; Pàmies, O.; Ruiz, A.; Díaz, Y.; Castillón, S.; Claver, C. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 2165–2192. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2004.04.009
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Díaz, Y.; Castillón, S.; Claver, C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34, 702–713. doi:10.1039/b400361f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Diéguez, M.; Claver, C.; Pàmies, O. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 4621–4634. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200700082
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Boysen, M. M. K. Chem.–Eur. J. 2007, 13, 8648–8659. doi:10.1002/chem.200701010
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Benessere, V.; De Roma, A.; Del Litto, R.; Ruffo, F. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010, 254, 390–401. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.05.001
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Desimoni, G.; Faita, G.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3561–3651. doi:10.1021/cr0505324
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. McManus, H. A.; Guiry, P. J. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4151–4202. doi:10.1021/cr040642v
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Gläser, B.; Kunz, H. Synlett 1998, 53–54. doi:10.1055/s-1998-3124
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Yonehara, K.; Hashizume, T.; Mori, K.; Ohe, K.; Uemura, S. Chem. Commun. 1999, 415–416. doi:10.1039/a810041a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Mata, Y.; Diéguez, M.; Pàmies, O.; Claver, C. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5597–5599. doi:10.1021/ol052176h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Hartinger, C. G.; Nazarov, A. A.; Galanski, M.; Reithofer, M.; Keppler, B. K. J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690, 3301–3308. doi:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2005.03.062
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Irmak, M.; Groschner, A.; Boysen, M. M. K. Chem. Commun. 2007, 177–179. doi:10.1039/b612986b
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  20. Minuth, T.; Boysen, M. M. K. Synlett 2008, 1483–1486. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1078419
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  21. Minuth, T.; Irmak, M.; Groschner, A.; Lehnert, T.; Boysen, M. M. K. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 997–1008. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200801035
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  22. Evans, D. A.; Woerpel, K. A.; Hinman, M. M.; Faul, M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 726–728. doi:10.1021/ja00002a080
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  23. Loewenthal, R. E.; Abiko, A.; Masamune, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 6005–6008. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)98014-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Lönn, H. Carbohydr. Res. 1985, 139, 105–113. doi:10.1016/0008-6215(85)90011-4
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Kajihara, Y.; Kodama, H.; Endo, T.; Hashimoto, H. Carbohydr. Res. 1998, 306, 361–378. doi:10.1016/S0008-6215(97)10093-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Emmerson, D. P. G.; Villard, R.; Muganini, C.; Batsanov, A.; Howard, J. A. K.; Hems, W. P.; Tooze, R. P.; Davis, B. G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3826–3838. doi:10.1039/b309715n
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Pei, Z.; Dong, H.; Caraballo, R.; Ramström, O. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 4927–4934. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200700364
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Luo, S.-Y.; Kulkarni, S. S.; Chou, C.-H.; Liao, W.-M.; Hung, S.-C. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1226–1229. doi:10.1021/jo051518u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Huang, L.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Ye, X.; Huang, X. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341, 1669–1679. doi:10.1016/j.carres.2006.01.007
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Sherman, A. A.; Yudina, O. N.; Mironov, Y. V.; Sukhova, E. V.; Shashkov, A. S.; Menshov, V. M.; Nifantiev, N. E. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 336, 13–46. doi:10.1016/S0008-6215(01)00213-0
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Sun, D.-Q.; Busson, R.; Herdewijn, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 5158–5166. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200600515
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Barton, D. H. R.; McCombie, S. W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1975, 1574–1585. doi:10.1039/P19750001574
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  33. Gemma, E. Synthesis of Oligosaccharides for Interaction Studies with Various Lectins. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stockholm, Sweden, 2005.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Elders, N.; Schmitz, R. F.; de Kanter, F. J. J.; Ruijter, E.; Groen, M. B.; Orru, R. V. A. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6135–6142. doi:10.1021/jo070840x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities