Carbamate-directed benzylic lithiation for the diastereo- and enantioselective synthesis of diaryl ether atropisomers

  1. Abigail Page and
  2. Jonathan Clayden

School of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd., Manchester M13 9PL, UK

  1. Corresponding author email

This article is part of the Thematic Series "Directed aromatic functionalization".

Guest Editor: V. Snieckus
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 1327–1333.
Received 21 Jun 2011, Accepted 24 Aug 2011, Published 26 Sep 2011


Diaryl ethers carrying carbamoyloxymethyl groups may be desymmetrised enantio- and diastereoselectively by the use of the sec-BuLi–(−)-sparteine complex in diethyl ether. Enantioselective deprotonation of one of the two benzylic positions leads to atropisomeric products with ca. 80:20 e.r.; an electrophilic quench typically provides functionalised atropisomeric diastereoisomers in up to 97:3 d.r.

Keywords: configurational stability; diaryl ether; diastereoselective; enantioselective; lateral lithiation; metallation


One of the first uses of the chiral diamine (−)-sparteine (1) in its now familiar role of controlling asymmetric deprotonation/electrophilic quench reactions [1] was an enantioselective benzylic deprotonation of bis(2,6-dimethylbenzene) with the aim of generating an atropisomeric product in enantiomerically enriched form (Scheme 1) [2]. Enantioselective lithiation has since then commonly been used to generate axial or planar chirality [3], in many cases by desymmetrising deprotonation of a functionalised aromatic system. The relative acidity of benzylic protons makes enantioselective deprotonation in the style of Scheme 1, of one of a pair of enantiotopic aromatic methyl, alkoxymethyl or acyloxymethyl substitutents, a viable approach to the asymmetric synthesis of atropisomeric molecules.


Scheme 1: Desymmetrising metallation for the enantioselective synthesis of atropisomers.

We have developed a number of methods for the synthesis of “nonstandard” atropisomer structures containing rigid fragments joined by a hindered single bond, but which are different from the typically well-studied biaryl compounds [4,5]. These non-biaryl atropisomers have included aromatic amides [6-8], ureas [9], ethers [10-12], sulfides and sulfones [13], and many of the methods we developed for their asymmetric synthesis employed dynamic resolution techniques under kinetic or thermodynamic control [6,11,13-16]. The mechanistic possibilities associated with dynamic resolution were initially elaborated by Beak for organolithium compounds having varying degrees of configurational stability [17,18], and in our studies on ureas and amides we were able to identify correlated inversion processes linking configurational inversion at organolithium centres with conformational inversion of atropisomeric chirality by bond rotation [19]. Several of the classes of atropisomers we have studied contain functional groups which are excellent directors of lithiation [20], and indeed our original interest in lithiation stemmed from the need to build these atropisomeric structures rapidly and efficiently [21].

We recently reported on the enantioselective synthesis of diaryl ethers (a potential new class of chiral ligand having a structure related to the wide bite angle diphosphine DPEPhos) by biocatalytic oxidation or reduction, and which made use of desymmetrisation of a “pro-atropisomeric” substrate 4 to achieve the required enantiomeric enrichment in the product 5 [22]. In this paper we report parallel studies on the attempted asymmetric synthesis of atropisomeric diaryl ethers in diastereomerically and/or enantiomerically enriched form by the directed deprotonation and electrophilic quench of benzylic positions ortho to a sterically hindered diaryl ether linkage.


An aryloxy group is a weak director of metallation [20,23], but in preliminary studies we were able to deprotonate and methylate the hindered diaryl ether 6 [10] by treatment with n-BuLi in ether at 0 °C with or without (−)-sparteine (Scheme 2). Methylation of the resulting organolithium returned the product 7 in up to 88% yield as a mixture of diastereoisomers (by NMR). Previous data on the conformational stability of related diaryl ether [10], coupled with our inability to separate these diastereoisomers, and the invariant ratio in which they were obtained, suggested that they are insufficiently hindered to exist as stable atropisomers and they interconvert on a relatively short timescale, of seconds to minutes, at room temperature.


Scheme 2: Benzylic lithiation of a diaryl ether.

In order to enhance the ease of metallation of the substrates (6 gives low yield at −78 °C unless sparteine is present), two diols 8 and 9, available from previous work, were converted to the biscarbamates 10 and 11. The metallation of O-benzylcarbamates has been studied extensively by Hoppe [1,24-26], and the deprotonation of 10 was achieved with sec-BuLi in ether and the addition of acetone, returning 12 as a single diastereoisomer (by NMR). Presumably in this case the diastereoisomers still interconvert, but the bulk of the new substituent means that one of the two diastereoisomers is significantly more stable than the other [27]. However we were unable to confirm the relative stereochemistry of the major diastereoisomer of the functionalised products (Scheme 3).


Scheme 3: Benzylic metallation of a diaryl ether α to a carbamate.

Moving to the 6’-methyl analogue 11 gave products that were expected to be atropisomeric [10], because they have four substituents ortho to the ether linkage, one of them tertiary. Deprotonation with sec-BuLi in Et2O at −78 °C and quenching with acetone, cyclobutanone, TMSCl or acetic anhydride all gave good yields of functionalised products with d.r.'s which varied according to the electrophile but were generally high (Scheme 4 and Table 1, entries 1–4). Having established good reactivity in a potentially atropisomeric substrate, we next evaluated the ability of (−)-sparteine [1,3] to control the enantioselectivity of these reactions. Premixing the sec-BuLi with (−)-sparteine in Et2O, before addition of the reaction substrate and then the electrophile, led to products being formed in high d.r. in each case and with e.r.’s between 73:27 and 81:19 (Table 1, entries 5–8).


Scheme 4: Diastereo- and enantioselective synthesis of atropisomeric ethers by benzylic lithiation.

Table 1: Yields and selectivities in the metallation/quench of 11.

entry 1 present? E+ = E = product yield d.r. e.r.
1 No acetone C(OH)Me2 13a 75 95:5
2 No cyclobutanone C(OH)(CH2)2 13b 56 85:15
3 No Me3SiCl SiMe3 13c 70 95:5
4 No Ac2O COMe 13d 69 85:15
5 Yes acetone C(OH)Me2 13a 86 >97:3 75:25
6 Yes cyclobutanone C(OH)(CH2)2 13b 26 >97:3 73:27
7 Yes Me3SiCl SiMe3 13c 72 95:5 78:22
8 Yes Ac2O COMe 13d 66 95:5 81:19

The reaction behaviour was very revealing when the benzyllithiums generated in the presence or absence of (−)-sparteine were quenched with the electrophile Bu3SnCl (Scheme 5 and Table 2). Unlike previous examples, the quench provided a product only very slowly; 16 h at −78 °C was required to reach a ca. 60% yield of the stannane 13e (Table 2, entry 3). After this time the diastereoselectivity was good, but it was clear that this was a result of a slow improvement in the product ratio as the reaction proceeded (Table 2, entries 1–3). Arresting the electrophilic quench after 90 min produced only a 9% yield of a 2:1 ratio of diastereoisomers of 13e, while intermediate reaction times gave ratios that slowly approached the ratio of 9:1 observed after 16 h. The diastereoisomeric ratios of the products remained unchanged even when the products were heated at 55 °C for 24 h, confirming that the anti and syn diastereoisomers of the stannanes are stable atropisomers.


Scheme 5: Atroposelective stannylation.

Table 2: Variation of yield and selectivity with quench time.

entry 1 present? t [h] yield d.r. e.r.
1 No 1.5 9 65:35
2 No 6 42 80:20
3 No 16 58 90:10
4 Yes 16 62 95:5 75:25
5 Yes 26 59 95:5 73:27

This proven conformational stability of the products 13e indicates that the change in product ratio as the reaction proceeds must be due to a slow change in the structure or diastereoisomeric composition of the lithiated intermediate as the reaction progresses. The results with Bu3SnCl suggest that lithiation generates an approximately 20:1 mixture of configurationally stable diastereoisomeric benzyllithiums of which the minor is significantly more reactive than the major (see below). A form of kinetic resolution occurs in which the minor organolithium is rapidly converted to product, followed slowly by the major organolithium [28]. Hoppe observed a related effect in the alkylations of cinnamyllithiums [29].

Previous results from the laboratories of Hoppe indicated that lithiated O-benzylcarbamates are typically configurationally unstable in ether on the macroscopic timescale [1], although Hoffmann detected microscopic configurational stability [30]. To demonstrate that the organolithium intermediates here do have some configurational stability, we treated samples of 13e of different diastereoisomeric and enantiomeric ratios with n-BuLi in ether at −78 °C to induce tin–lithium exchange, quenching the products with either acetone or Me3SiCl (Scheme 6).


Scheme 6: Stereospecific tin–lithium exchange/quench reactions.

The major product diastereoisomers were the same as those formed by direct deprotonation quench (Scheme 2). Importantly, in Table 3, entries 1 and 3 show that the diastereoisomeric ratio of the product was at least partly dependent on the d.r. of the starting stannane, necessarily indicating some degree of macroscopic configurational stability. The ratios were not identical, but yields were low, thus differential rates of the reaction of the two diastereoisomeric organolithiums may again be to blame. Enantiomerically enriched stannane returned enantiomerically enriched product, showing that racemisation (which necessarily involves either rotation about the Ar–O–Ar axis or deprotonation–reprotonation) is also slow.

Table 3: Stereospecificity in the tin–lithium exchange/quench reactions.

entry 13e d.r. 13e e.r. E+ = product, d.r. e.r.
1 90:10 Me3SiCl 13c, 94:6
2 90:10 acetone 13a, >95:5
3 80:20 Me3SiCl 13c, 88:12
4 >95:5 80:20 Me3SiCl 13c, >95:5 80:20


Due to the gummy nature of the products, it turned out to be impossible to establish unequivocally the relative or absolute stereochemistry of the products obtained from the lithiations. However, we can make several important conclusions from this work.

Firstly, racemisation of the intermediate organolithiums is demonstrably slow, because an enantioenriched stannane yields, after tin–lithium exchange and quench, products with conserved e.r. (Table 3, entry 4). The e.r. of the products formed by deprotonation with an alkyllithium-(−)-sparteine complex must therefore be determined during the deprotonation step, in which the alkyllithium-(−)-sparteine complex elects to deprotonate one of the two enantiotopic CH2OCb groups of the starting material. Every e.r. produced during this study fell between 75:25 and 81:19, irrespective of the electrophile, so our conclusion is that this selectivity represents the enantioselectivity of the alkyllithium-(−)-sparteine deprotonation step.

Secondly, since epimerisation of the organolithiums is also slow enough for different d.r.'s of a stananne to yield different d.r.'s of a product (Table 3, entries 1 and 3), we can be certain that the secondary benzyllithium centre is macroscopically stable on the timescale of these reactions. This is in contrast with previous reports of benzyllithiums derived from primary benzylcarbamates [1], though not for secondary benzylcarbamates [24], so we assume that steric bulk or electron donation from the ether group is responsible.

Thirdly, the change in ratio of the stannane products in Table 2 with time indicates that two diastereoisomeric organolithiums are formed in unequal quantities. Our best estimate is that the diastereoisomeric ratio of the organolithiums is of the order of 90:10 or 95:5, perhaps better in the presence of (−)-sparteine since d.r.'s were uniformly higher when (−)-sparteine was present (though this may also be due to an improvement in the stereospecificity of the quench).

Fourthly, diastereoselectivity, unlike enantioselectivity, varies significantly according to the electrophile employed, showing that the product d.r. is determined in the electrophilic quench step. Precedent studies suggest that electrophilic quench of benzylcarbamates is typically invertive [24]: All documented stannylations of benzyllithiums are invertive [23], and all documented tin–lithium exchanges (except one, where there is no adjacent heteroatom [31]) are retentive [23]. If these assumptions hold true here, then formation of the same diastereoisomer of the product silane 13a or alcohol 13c, by either deprotonation or by stannylation tin–lithium exchange (Table 3, entries 1 and 2), therefore indicates that both of these electrophiles also react with inversion. Lower d.r.'s may result from some electrophiles by competitive reaction with up to 15% retention (Table 1), and the effect of (−)-sparteine on the d.r.'s in Table 1 may be because its steric bulk helps to suppress this competing retentive pathway.

Lack of crystallinity has meant that we cannot unequivocally assign absolute or relative stereochemistry in this work. However, a few reasonable assumptions allow us to propose likely assignments, and these are the ones used in the structural diagrams in this paper:

1. (−)-Sparteine favours deprotonation of the pro-S proton of carbamates. Invertive quench would result in the formation of the products with stereogenic centres as illustrated in Scheme 7(a).

2. The slower invertive reaction of the major organolithium diastereoisomer with Bu3SnCl suggests that the product of this reaction is more hindered (Scheme 7(c)), and we therefore propose that the major diastereoisomers of the reactions are as shown in Scheme 7(b).


Scheme 7: Proposed stereochemical pathway.


Overall, we have shown in this paper that the use of an alkyllithium-(−)-sparteine deprotonation can desymmetrise a pro-atropisomeric biscarbamoyloxy diarylether, with enantiomeric ratios of up to 81:19. Some mechanistic details of the stereochemical course of the lithiation–substitution reactions have been elucidated, and further work remains to exploit this transformation for the potential synthesis of new classes of chiral ligands [12].

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Experimental details and spectral data.
Format: PDF Size: 777.4 KB Download


We are grateful to GSK and the EPSRC for a CASE award (to AP).


  1. Hoppe, D.; Hense, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2282. doi:10.1002/anie.199722821
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  2. Engelhardt, L. M.; Leung, W.-P.; Raston, C. L.; Salem, G.; Twiss, P.; White, A. H. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1988, 2403. doi:10.1039/DT9880002403
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Clayden, J. Enantioselective Synthesis by Lithiation to Generate Planar or Axial Chirality. In Organolithiums in Enantioselective Synthesis; Hodgson, D. M., Ed.; Topics in Organometallic Chemistry, Vol. 5; Springer: Berlin, 2003; pp 251–286. doi:10.1007/3-540-36117-0_8
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  4. Clayden, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 949. doi:10.1002/anie.199709491
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Wolf, C. Dynamic Stereochemistry of Chiral Compounds; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, 2008.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Clayden, J.; Johnson, P.; Pink, J. H.; Helliwell, M. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7033. doi:10.1021/jo0007074
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  7. Clayden, J.; Mitjans, D.; Youssef, L. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5266. doi:10.1021/ja017702o
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Clayden, J.; McCarthy, C.; Helliwell, M. Chem. Commun. 1999, 2059. doi:10.1039/a906398f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Clayden, J.; Turner, H.; Helliwell, M.; Moir, E. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4415. doi:10.1021/jo702706c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Betson, M. S.; Clayden, J.; Worrall, C. P.; Peace, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5803. doi:10.1002/anie.200601866
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  11. Clayden, J.; Worrall, C. P.; Moran, W. J.; Helliwell, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3234. doi:10.1002/anie.200705660
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  12. Clayden, J.; Fletcher, S. P.; Senior, J.; Worrall, C. P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2010, 21, 1355. doi:10.1016/j.tetasy.2010.06.017
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  13. Clayden, J.; Senior, J.; Helliwell, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6270. doi:10.1002/anie.200901718
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  14. Clayden, J.; Lai, L. W.; Helliwell, M. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 4399. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2004.01.101
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Clayden, J.; Turner, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 3216. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.02.021
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Bracegirdle, A.; Clayden, J.; Lai, L. W. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2008, 4, No. 47. doi:10.3762/bjoc.4.47
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Beak, P.; Johnson, T. A.; Kim, D. D.; Lim, S. H. Enantioselective Synthesis by Lithiation Adjacent to Nitrogen and Electrophile Incorporatio. In Organolithiums in Enantioselective Synthesis; Hodgson, D. M., Ed.; Topics in Organometallic Chemistry, Vol. 5; Springer: Berlin, 2003; pp 139–176. doi:10.1007/3-540-36117-0_5
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Basu, A.; Thayumanavan, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 716. doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20020301)41:5<716::AID-ANIE716>3.0.CO;2-Z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Clayden, J.; Stimson, C. C.; Keenan, M.; Wheatley, A. E. H. Chem. Commun. 2004, 228. doi:10.1039/b310963a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Clayden, J. Directed metallation of aromatic compounds. In The Chemistry of Organolithium Compounds; Rappoport, Z.; Marek, I., Eds.; Wiley: Chichester, U.K., 2004; pp 495–646.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  21. Clayden, J. Synlett 1998, 810. doi:10.1055/s-1998-1784
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Yuan, B.; Page, A.; Worrall, C. P.; Escalettes, F.; Willies, S. C.; McDouall, J. J. W.; Turner, N. J.; Clayden, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7010. doi:10.1002/anie.201002580
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Clayden, J. Organolithiums: Selectivity for Synthesis. Tetrahedron Organic Chemistry, Vol. 23; Baldwin, J.; Williams, R. M.; Bäckvall J.-E., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, U.K., 2002.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  24. Derwing, C.; Hoppe, D. Synthesis 1996, 149. doi:10.1055/s-1996-4163
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  25. Derwing, C.; Frank, H.; Hoppe, D. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 3519. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0690(199912)1999:12<3519::AID-EJOC3519>3.0.CO;2-N
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Hoppe, D.; Hintze, F.; Tebben, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 1422. doi:10.1002/anie.199014221
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Betson, M. S.; Bracegirdle, A.; Clayden, J.; Helliwell, M.; Lund, A.; Pickworth, M.; Snape, T. J.; Worrall, C. P. Chem. Commun. 2007, 754. doi:10.1039/b614618j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Basu, A.; Beak, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1575. doi:10.1021/ja951895w
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Behrens, K.; Fröhlich, R.; Meyer, O.; Hoppe, D. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 2397. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0690(199811)1998:11<2397::AID-EJOC2397>3.0.CO;2-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Hoffmann, R. W.; Rühl, T.; Harbach, J. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1992, 725. doi:10.1002/jlac.1992199201122
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Clayden, J.; Helliwell, M.; Pink, J. H.; Westlund, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12449. doi:10.1021/ja0112590
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2011 Page and Clayden; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (

Back to Article List

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities

Keep Informed

RSS Feed

Subscribe to our Latest Articles RSS Feed.


Follow the Beilstein-Institut


Twitter: @BeilsteinInst