Electrochemical generation of 2,3-oxazolidinone glycosyl triflates as an intermediate for stereoselective glycosylation

  1. 1 ,
  2. 1 ,
  3. 1 ,
  4. 2 ,
  5. 2,3 and
  6. 1
1Department of Synthetic Chemistry and Biological Chemistry, Kyoto University, Nishikyo-ku Kyoto 615-8510 Japan
2Advanced Science Institute, RIKEN, Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
3ERATO JST, Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
  1. Corresponding author email
Guest Editor: T. K. Lindhorst
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2012, 8, 456–460. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.8.52
Received 11 Jan 2012, Accepted 06 Mar 2012, Published 28 Mar 2012


Glycosyl triflates with a 2,3-oxazolidinone protecting group were generated from thioglycosides by low-temperature electrochemical oxidation. The glycosyl triflates reacted with alcohols to give the corresponding glycosides β-selectively at low temperatures. However, α-selectivity was observed in the absence of base at elevated reaction temperatures. In situ generated triflic acid promotes the isomerization of β-products to α-products.


Stereoselective formation of glycosidic linkages is the key issue in oligosaccharide synthesis, because both 1,2-trans and 1,2-cis aminoglycosides are ubiquitous in biologically active oligosaccharides [1-5]. The 1,2-trans aminoglycosides, which are found in Nod factor [1] and lipid A [2], can be easily prepared by protecting the 2-amino group with phthaloyl or carbamate groups [6]. On the other hand, 1,2-cis glycosidic linkages are still difficult to make with perfect stereoselectivity. Although 2-azido-substituted glycosyl donors are commonly used for the preparation of 1,2-cis glycosidic linkages of amino sugars [7,8], the selectivity highly depends on the nature of the glycosyl acceptors and reaction conditions. In the last decade, 2,3-oxazolidinone protected 2-amino-2-deoxy-glycosides have been developed as glycosyl donors for the stereoselective synthesis of amino sugars [9-24]. These glycosyl donors afford the corresponding glycosides in a 1,2-trans or 1,2-cis selective manner by action with various types of glycosyl acceptors. However, it is still uncertain whether glycosyl triflate intermediates [25], which were detected by NMR, play an important role in the stereoselective formation of both α- and β-isomers.

We have developed an electrochemical method to generate and accumulate highly reactive glycosyl triflates by low-temperature electrochemical oxidation of thioglycosides [26-30]. Although Kerns and Ye have already reported a chemically generated glycosyl triflate equipped with an acetylated 2,3-oxazolidinone protecting group [11,19], we envisioned that the electrochemically generated glycosyl triflate with a 2,3-oxazolidinone protecting group could be a useful intermediate to reveal stereoselectivity in glycosylations via glycosyl triflate intermediates. In this paper, we report the generation, accumulation, and characterization by low-temperature NMR analyses, of the corresponding glycosyl triflates. Electrochemical glycosylation of the thioglycoside donor with 2,3-oxazolidinone protecting group gave both 1,2-trans linkages in the presence of a base at low temperatures and 1,2-cis glycosidic linkages in the absence of a base at elevated temperatures.

Results and Discussion

We began by conducting the electrochemical oxidation of 2,3-oxazolidinone thioglycosides 1a1c in the absence of a glycosyl acceptor at low temperatures in order to generate and accumulate the corresponding glycosyl triflates (Scheme 1). Low-temperature NMR measurements of the anodic solution were carried out to confirm the structure of the glycosyl triflates. For example, the anodic solution obtained by the electrochemical oxidation of thioglycoside 1a (4 mA, 1 h) exhibited a single set of peaks for glycosyl triflate 2a in the 1H NMR spectrum at −80 °C (Figure 1). In contrast to the previous reports by Kerns and Ye, the corresponding β-triflate was not observed under these conditions [11,19]. The small coupling constant of the anomeric proton (J = 2.1 Hz) indicates α-configuration of the anomeric triflate. The 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts of the anomeric protons and carbons of glycosyl triflates 2ac are listed in Table 1. In all cases, the starting thioglycosides 1ac were quantitatively converted to the corresponding glycosyl triflates 2ac, which have α-configuration of the anomeric triflate. Although the chemical shift of the anomeric proton H-1 of glycosyl triflate 2a appears at a lower chemical shift (6.89 ppm) than those of glycosyl triflates 2b (5.97 ppm) and 2c (5.95 ppm), the chemical shift of the anomeric carbon is around 100 ppm in all cases and the corresponding cross peaks of the anomeric protons and carbons were observed in HMQC spectra.


Scheme 1: Electrochemical conversion of thioglycosides to glycosyl triflates.


Figure 1: 1H NMR spectrum of glycosyl triflate 2a.

Table 1: 1H- and 13C NMR chemical shifts of the anomeric proton and carbon of glycosyl triflates 2ac.

entry glycosyl triflate 1H NMR
[δ (ppm)a, J (Hz)b]
[δ (ppm)a]
1 2a 6.89, 2.1c 99.9
2 2b 5.97, singlet 99.9
3 2c 5.95, singlet 100.7

achemical shift; bcoupling constant; cdoublet.

Using electrochemically generated glycosyl triflate 2a, the stereoselectivity of the glycosylation was investigated by the addition of five equiv of various alcohols (Table 2). In accordance with our previous results [26,29], high β-selectvity was observed with highly reactive alcohols (Table 2, entries 1 and 2). On the other hand, less nucleophilic alcohols, such as benzyl alcohol and CF3CH2OH, gave the corresponding glycosides in lower β-selectivity than methanol or ethanol (Table 2, entries 3 and 4) [31].

Table 2: Glycosylation of electrochemically generated glycosyl triflate 2a.

[Graphic 1]
entry ROH product: yielda, ratio (α to β)b
1 MeOH 3: 76% (<1 to >99)
2 EtOH 4: 71% (<1 to >99)
3 BnOH 5: 89% (9 to 91)
4 CF3CH2OH 6: 82% (15 to 85)

aisolated yields; bdetermined by 1H NMR.

Next, we examined the electrochemical activation of thioglycoside 1a to generate glycosyl triflate 2a in the presence of glycosyl acceptor 7. In order to improve the yield and the stereoselectivity of glycosylation, we examined the effects of the reaction temperature and base (Table 3). Although poor β-selectivity and yield were observed at low temperatures in the absence of a base (Table 3, entry 1), the addition of an organic base such as 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylpyridine (DTBMP), significantly improved the β-selectivity and yield (Table 3, entry 2). In both cases small amounts of the α-isomers of the starting thioglycoside 9 and glucal 10 were obtained as byproducts (Table 3, entries 1 and 2). The yield was further increased and the formation of byproducts was suppressed by raising the reaction temperature to 0 °C (Table 3, entry 3). On the other hand, the corresponding α-isomer of disaccharide was obtained as a major product together with the anomerized donor 9 when the reaction was performed at 0 °C in the absence of DTBMP (Table 3, entry 4). These anomerizations may be caused by the endocyclic cleavage reaction [22-24], which is often observed for pyranosides with a 2,3-trans carbamate group, under acidic conditions. The yield of disaccharide 8 was improved by raising the temperature to 0 °C after the completion of electrolysis at −78 °C (Table 3, entry 5). The fact that disaccharide 8 was obtained in higher yields (59% to 78%) and that only a trace amount of α-isomer 9 (4%) was obtained strongly suggests that the isomerization of thioglycoside donor 1a occurs during the electrolysis at 0 °C. It is noteworthy that the α- and β-glycosides could be selectively prepared from the same glycosyl donor with a 2,3-trans carbamate group, simply by changing the reaction conditions.

Table 3: Electrochemical glycosylation in the presence of glycosyl acceptor.

[Graphic 2]
entry T base product: yield, ratio ( to )a
1 −78 °C 8b: 36% (46 to 54) 9: <3%c 10: 34%c
2 −78 °C DTBMPd 8: 60% (4 to 96) 9: <3%c 10: 24%c
3 0 °C DTBMPd 8: 79% (3 to 97) 9: trace 10: trace
4 0 °C 8: 59% (α only) 9: 29%c 10: 2%c
5 −78 °C then 0 °Ce 8: 78% (α only)f 9: 4%c 10: 8%c

adetermined by 1H NMR; b1a (ca 15%) was recovered; cyields are based on 1a; d5.0 equiv; ethe reaction temperature was raised after electrolysis; f1a (ca 6%) was recovered.

In order to confirm that the anomerization of to could take place under the reaction conditions, we examined the acid-mediated isomerization of the β-isomer of disaccharide to the α-isomer (Scheme 2). Triflic acid (TfOH) must be generated in situ by the reaction of glycosyl triflate 2a with alcohols. Thus, TfOH (1.0 equiv) and tetrabutylammonium triflate (Bu4NOTf) (5.0 equiv), which was used as a supporting electrolyte for electrolysis, were added to a CH2Cl2 solution of the β-isomer of disaccharide at 0 °C. After stirring at 0 °C for 1 h, the reaction was quenched by the addition of Et3N. The α-isomer of the disaccharide was obtained in 83% yield as a single isomer. This experiment shows that the α-product is the isomerization product of the β-isomer as a result of endocyclic cleavage, as shown in Scheme 2.


Scheme 2: Triflic acid mediated isomerization of β-glycoside.


In conclusion, we have achieved the electrochemical generation and accumulation of glycosyl triflates equipped with the 2,3-oxazolidinone protecting group. This glycosyl triflate intermediate reacted with alcohols of high reactivity to afford β-glycosides as kinetic products. The α-products were also obtained at elevated temperatures after anomerization of the β-products, as both Oscarson and our group have previously reported [18,22-24]. Namely, α- and β-glycosides were obtained from 2,3-oxazolidinone donors by changing the reaction conditions. Further investigations to reveal the scope and limitations of the glycosylation reaction using electrochemically generated glycosyl triflates are in progress in our laboratory.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Experimental procedures, spectral data of glycosyl triflates and new compounds, and 1H- and 13C NMR spectra.
Format: PDF Size: 2.9 MB Download


This work was financially supported in part by the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (No. 2015) from the MEXT. S. M. thanks Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) from JSPS (grant number 21590036) and Ms. Akemi Takahashi for her technical assistance. T. N. thanks Meiji Seika Kaisha, Ltd. Award in Synthetic Organic Chemistry. The authors thank Dr. Keiko Kuwata and Ms. Sakiko Goto for MS analyses.


  1. Long, S. R. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 1885–1898. doi:10.1105/tpc.8.10.1885
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  2. Raetz, C. R. H.; Whitfield, C. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2002, 71, 635–700. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135414
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  3. Werz, D. B.; Ranzinger, R.; Herget, S.; Adibekian, A.; von der Lieth, C.-W.; Seeberger, P. H. ACS Chem. Biol. 2007, 2, 685–691. doi:10.1021/cb700178s
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Hu, Y.-P.; Lin, S.-Y.; Huang, C.-Y.; Zulueta, M. M. L.; Liu, J.-Y.; Chang, W.; Hung, S.-C. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 557–563. doi:10.1038/nchem.1073
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Petitou, M.; von Boeckel, C. A. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3118–3133. doi:10.1002/anie.200300640
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Banoub, J.; Baullanger, P.; Lafont, D. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 1167–1195. doi:10.1021/cr00014a002
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Paulsen, H.; Kolář, Č.; Stenzel, W. Chem. Ber. 1978, 111, 2358–2369. doi:10.1002/cber.19781110630
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Lemieux, R. U.; Ratcliffe, R. M. Can. J. Chem. 1979, 57, 1244–1251. doi:10.1139/v79-203
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Benakli, K.; Zha, C.; Kerns, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9461–9462. doi:10.1021/ja0162109
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Kerns, R. J.; Zha, C.; Benakli, K.; Liang, Y.-Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 8069–8072. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2003.09.058
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Wei, P.; Kerns, R. J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4195–4198. doi:10.1021/jo047812o
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  12. Boysen, M.; Gemma, E.; Lahmann, M.; Oscarson, S. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3044–3046. doi:10.1039/b503651h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Manabe, S.; Ishii, K.; Ito, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10666–10667. doi:10.1021/ja062531e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Manabe, S.; Ishii, K.; Ito, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6107–6115. doi:10.1021/jo070669p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Geng, Y.; Zhang, L.-H.; Ye, X.-S. Chem. Commun. 2008, 597–599. doi:10.1039/b712591g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Geng, Y.; Zhang, L.-H.; Ye, X.-S. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 4949–4958. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.03.103
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Manabe, S.; Ishii, K.; Ito, Y. Trends Glycosci. Glycotech. 2008, 20, 187–202. doi:10.4052/tigg.20.187
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Olsson, J. D. M.; Eriksson, L.; Lahmann, M.; Oscarson, S. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 7181–7188. doi:10.1021/jo800971s
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  19. Geng, Y.; Ye, X.-S. Synlett 2010, 2506–2512. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1258557
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  20. Manabe, S.; Ishii, K.; Ito, Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 497–516. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201001278
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Manabe, S.; Aihara, Y.; Ito, Y. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 9720–9722. doi:10.1039/c1cc13172a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Manabe, S.; Ishii, K.; Hashizume, D.; Koshino, H.; Ito, Y. Chem.–Eur. J. 2009, 15, 6894–6901. doi:10.1002/chem.200900064
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  23. Manabe, S.; Ito, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 4827–4829. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.05.119
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  24. Satoh, H.; Manabe, S.; Ito, Y.; Lüthi, H. P.; Laino, T.; Hutter, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 5610–5619. doi:10.1021/ja201024a
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  25. Crich, D. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 9193–9209. doi:10.1021/jo2017026
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Nokami, T.; Shibuya, A.; Tsuyama, H.; Suga, S.; Bowers, A. A.; Crich, D.; Yoshida, J.-i. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10922–10928. doi:10.1021/ja072440x
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  27. Nokami, T.; Shibuya, A.; Yoshida, J.-i. Trends Glycosci. Glycotech. 2008, 20, 175–185. doi:10.4052/tigg.20.175
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Nokami, T.; Tsuyama, H.; Shibuya, A.; Nakatsutsumi, T.; Yoshida, J.-i. Chem. Lett. 2008, 37, 942–943. doi:10.1246/cl.2008.942
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Nokami, T.; Shibuya, A.; Manabe, S.; Ito, Y.; Yoshida, J.-i. Chem.–Eur. J. 2009, 15, 2252–2255. doi:10.1002/chem.200802293
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  30. Nokami, T.; Nozaki, Y.; Saigusa, Y.; Shibuya, A.; Manabe, S.; Ito, Y.; Yoshida, J.-i. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1544–1547. doi:10.1021/ol200242u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. The observed stereoselectivity was determined kinetically; however, the possibility of the isomerization of the β-isomer to the thermodynamically more stable α-isomer cannot be excluded.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities