5 article(s) from Giessibl, Franz J.
Figure 1: (a) Sketch of the qPlus sensor in LFM orientation with amplitude A and the sensor tilt θ. (b) Photo...
Figure 2: Simulated Morse potential interaction for a LFM setup and comparison to normal AFM. θ is defined by ...
Figure 3: Simulating the effect of a laterally oscillating tip with different amplitudes and tilt angles on t...
Figure 4: Two-dimensional (2D) current map without oscillation and calculated and recorded curve with oscilla...
Figure 5: Structure of the fitting algorithm to avoid a local minimum. Random starting values within definabl...
Figure 6: Error as a function of A and θ. (a) The blue circles show the calculated error for varying amplitud...
Figure 7: Two-dimensional (2D) current map without oscillation and calculated and recorded curve with oscilla...
Figure 1: 1D schematic of the tip–sample convolution at islands and holes. Due to the tip geometry step edges...
Figure 2: 1.5 μm × 1.0μm sections showing the time evolution of artificial defects and accumulations in three...
Figure 3: Maximum depth of the observed holes over time. The poking holes to which the letters correspond is ...
Figure 4: 200 nm × 200 nm 3D profile image of the generated scratching site directly taken after generating, ...
Figure 5: Volume of the hole and accumulation at 3.0% < RH < 5.5% within seven days. No significant change in...
Figure 6: 250 nm × 250 nm images of the time evolution of both defect and accumulation at different consecuti...
Figure 7: Time evolution of both defect and accumulation volume. After an initial settling time the logarithm...
Figure 8: 200 nm × 200 nm sections of the time evolution of the scratching site at RH = 28.2%. Each image is ...
Figure 9: Time course of the size and change rate of the observed defect (upper position) and accumulation (l...
Figure 1: (Color online). Geometry of length extensional resonator (a), tuning fork (b), standard qPlus senso...
Figure 2: (Color online). Relative frequency change of quartz based AFM sensors from 4.8–48 K. The coupled os...
Figure 3: (a) Numerical derivative ∂kts/∂T for all tuning fork and qPlus sensors from 5–47 K. (b) ∂kts/∂T for...
Figure 4: Thermal excitation spectra for sensors C (a) and Ct (b). The center frequency in (a) is f0 = 32.939...
Figure 1: (a) Definition of the z-axis: The cantilever oscillates with a constant amplitude A. The lower turn...
Figure 2: Amplitude dependence of the CoD for the Morse force law. The positions marked with 1, 2, 3, and 4 c...
Figure 3: Model force Fts(z), deconvoluted force FS/M(z) and the residuals ΔFS/M(z) for the Morse force law w...
Figure 4: Amplitude dependence of the deviation in magnitude (a) and position (b) from the force minimum for ...
Figure 5: Amplitude dependence of the CoD for a Lennard-Jones force law. The positions marked with 1, 2, 3, a...
Figure 6: Model force Fts(z), deconvoluted force curves FS/M(z) and the residuals ΔFS/M(z) for the Lennard-Jo...
Figure 7: Amplitude dependence of the deviation in magnitude (a) and position (b) from the force minimum for ...
Figure 8: Dependence of the CoD on the ratio A/d of amplitude and step width for the Morse and the Lennard-Jo...
Figure 9: (a) Amplitude dependence of the CoD for Morse force law with different decay constants κ (see legen...
Figure 1: (a) MFM probes the force between the magnetic dipole moment of a probe tip and the magnetic stray f...
Figure 2: Lift Mode FM-MFM image using a qPlus sensor with an etched iron tip attached to it (see inset in a)...
Figure 3: Lift Mode FM-MFM image employing a qPlus sensor with a commercial cobalt-coated MFM cantilever tip ...