Silver and gold-catalyzed multicomponent reactions

  1. Giorgio Abbiati and
  2. Elisabetta Rossi

Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Sezione di Chimica Generale e Organica “A. Marchesini”, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Venezian, 21 – 20133 Milano, Italy

  1. Corresponding author email

This article is part of the Thematic Series "Multicomponent reactions II".

Guest Editor: T. J. J. Müller
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 481–513. doi:10.3762/bjoc.10.46
Received 08 Nov 2013, Accepted 17 Jan 2014, Published 26 Feb 2014


Silver and gold salts and complexes mainly act as soft and carbophilic Lewis acids even if their use as σ-activators has been rarely reported. Recently, transformations involving Au(I)/Au(III)-redox catalytic systems have been reported in the literature. In this review we highlight all these aspects of silver and gold-mediated processes and their application in multicomponent reactions.

Keywords: A3-coupling; gold; multicomponent reactions; silver


Coinage metals (copper, silver and gold) are extensively used in the homogenous catalysis of organic reactions. Similarities and differences in the catalytic activity of these elements have been recently reviewed in an excellent book chapter by Hashmi [1]. Hashmi emphasized the difference between the “oldest” member of the family (copper), silver and the “youngest” one (gold) in terms of the literature references available for each of these three elements. Thus, the catalysis-related literature is more comprehensive for copper than for silver and gold. However, silver and gold experienced a continuous growth in interest by the scientific community. This also holds true in the field of multicomponent reactions (MCRs). A rough investigation of the literature dealing with Ag or Au-mediated MCRs published since 2000 reveals an exponential growth in the number of published papers. A deeper analysis allows discriminating between a specific class of multicomponent reactions, the A3-coupling reactions, which are subjected to systematic investigations, and a plethora of miscellaneous reactions. Thus, this review pursues two objectives. Firstly, we want to provide a brief overview of the most recent advances of silver and gold-mediated A3-coupling reactions. Seecondly, we aim for classifying the remaining classes of MCRs mediated by silver and gold species covering the literature from 2000 to early 2013. Advancements of the A3-coupling reactions have been recently highlighted in exhaustive and outstanding reviews by Li [2] and Van der Eycken [3], both of which cover the literature until 2010. Thus, our contribution will cover the past three years with a particular emphasis on the incorporation of the A3-coupling products into tandem reactions. The second goal could be achieved by classifying reactions on the basis of the involved reactants, the reaction type or the role of the catalyst.


A3-coupling-type reactions

Silver catalysis

The catalytic direct 1,2-addition of alkynes to imines and iminium ions, generated from the condensation of amines and aldehydes, represents the most convenient method to access propargylamines [4]. Although numerous examples of the A3-coupling reaction have been reported, there are still many challenges and opportunities for this multicomponent coupling reaction. The expansion of its scope to include difficult substrates such as aliphatic primary amines and ammonia, the development of highly enantioselective A3-coupling reactions with broad substrate specificity, and the incorporation of the A3-coupling reaction into tandem processes are all challenges that are expected to be overcome in the near future.

The first example of Ag(I)-catalyzed A3-coupling was reported by Li and co-workers in 2003 [5]. In this pioneering work, a simple silver(I) salt demonstrated to be able to catalyze the coupling between aliphatic/aromatic aldehydes, cyclic secondary amines and arylacetylenes in water at 100 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere. Among the different silver salts tested, AgI gave the best results. Alkyl aldehydes displayed a higher reactivity with respect to aryl aldehydes, whereas acyclic secondary amines were not well tolerated. Most importantly, the AgI-catalyzed A3-coupling avoided the annoying aldehyde trimerization usually observed when reacting aliphatic aldehydes under the more investigated Cu(I) and Au(I) catalysis (see below). The proposed mechanism involved the formation of a silver acetylide, which is able to react with the iminium ion generated in situ from aldehydes and amines to give the corresponding propargylamines 1 (Scheme 1).


Scheme 1: General reaction mechanism for Ag(I)-catalyzed A3-coupling reactions.

As Li and Van der Eycken reported in their valuable reviews, some other silver salts (e.g., Ag3PW12O40 [6], AgX [7]), complexes [8], zeolites [9] and nanoparticles [10,11] have been explored to catalyze the A3-coupling, but only recently, silver–NHC complexes were found to be valuable catalysts for this MCR. Their first application was reported by Wang and co-workers in 2008 [12], who developed a polystyrene-supported NHC–Ag(I) complex as an efficient catalyst for the A3-coupling under solvent-free conditions, at room temperature, and under a nitrogen atmosphere. The in situ generated polymer-supported complexes 2 were claimed to be more active than the parent NHC–silver halides. The reactions afforded the corresponding propargylamines 1 in excellent yields starting from aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes, a wide range of secondary amines, as well as aryl and alkyl-substituted alkynes (Scheme 2). It is noteworthy that the approach tolerated challenging substrates such as formaldehyde, o-substituted benzaldehydes, and secondary aromatic amines. Moreover, the PS–NHC–Ag(I) catalyst was proven to be reusable at least 12 times without a significant loss of its catalytic activity. Similar PS–NHC–silver complexes were recently prepared via click-chemistry, and their aptitude to catalyze A3-coupling was verified [13].


Scheme 2: A3-coupling reaction catalyzed by polystyrene-supported NHC–silver halides.

The suitability of NHC–Ag(I) complexes as catalysts for A3-coupling MCR was confirmed, and independently developed some years later by the research groups of Zou [14], Navarro [15] and Tang [16] (Figure 1).


Figure 1: Various NHC–Ag(I) complexes used as catalysts for A3-coupling.

Zou and co-workers reported structurally well-defined N-heterocyclic carbene silver halides of 1-cyclohexyl-3-arylmethylimidazolylidene to be effective catalysts in a model reaction among 3-phenylpropionaldehyde, phenylacetylene and piperidine in dioxane at 100 °C in open air [14]. Although the scope was not investigated, the authors observed that the activity of the catalyst was notably affected by the nature of the anion in the order Cl > Br >> I. They argued that the true catalytic species would be a structurally stable and coordinatively unsaturated N-heterocyclic carbene silver halide NHC–AgX rather than a silver cation. Thus, a more detailed mechanism was proposed, in which the π-complex of the catalyst with the alkyne I reacts with an amine to form the silver acetylide II and the amine hydrohalide III. The latter then condenses with the aldehyde to generate the iminium halide IV, which reacts with the previously generated silver acetylide II to afford the desired product 1 and regenerate the catalyst (Scheme 3).


Scheme 3: Proposed reaction mechanism for NHC–AgCl catalyzed A3-coupling reactions.

Bearing in mind the importance of the counter ion of the Ag complex, Navarro and co-workers developed a new saturated 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazolium (SIPr) silver complex, characterized by the presence of a less bulky acetoxy anion [15]. The new NHC–Ag(I) complex displayed a broad scope in A3-coupling reactions, tolerating alkyl and arylaldehydes (also unactivated ones), cyclic and linear secondary aliphatic amines, and terminal alkyl/aryl alkynes. It is noteworthy that the reactions occurred under mild conditions with a low catalyst loading. The solvent of choice was methanol (technical grade), but the reaction ran also well in other alcohols and acetonitrile, whereas yields were rather low in toluene.

In this context, Tang and co-workers very recently presented some original mono- and dinuclear silver–NHC complexes derived from 1-[2-(pyrazol-1-yl)phenyl]imidazole, which displayed good catalytic activity on a model A3-coupling reaction under Zou conditions at a slightly lower temperature (80 °C), but under an argon atmosphere [16].

An interesting Ag-promoted cascade synthesis of pyrrole-2-carboxyaldehydes involving an A3-coupling followed by an unusual imidazole ring opening, was reported by Liu in 2011 [17]. The authors found that propargylamines derived from the AgBF4-catalyzed coupling of imidazole-4-carboxyaldehydes 3, differently substituted alkynes and secondary amines were susceptible to a subsequent in situ transformation to give 3,5-disubstituted pyrrole-2-carboxaldehydes 4 in moderate to good yields in addition to variable amounts of 5-substituted-5H-pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazol-7(6H)-one 5 (Scheme 4). To obtain the best results and to reduce the formation of the pyrroloimidazolone 5, the reactions were performed in the presence of 20 mol % of AgBF4, 1.2 equiv of AgNO3 and 1.5 equiv of DIPEA in wet NMP.


Scheme 4: Liu’s synthesis of pyrrole-2-carboxaldehydes 4.

Yields dramatically fall away when alkylalkynes were employed. Water was proven to be necessary in the reaction system. A series of experiments with 1-, 2- or 5-formylimidazoles and selected control reactions with the isolated propargylamine intermediate, partly in the presence of D2O or H218O, were helpful to clarify the mechanism of the formation of pyrrole-2-carboxaldehydes and its byproduct. Key steps of the process are the silver-catalyzed intramolecular cyclization of propargylamine followed by a competitive 1,3- or 1,5-isomerization and a subsequent hydrolysis, yielding the pyrroloimidazolone 5 or the pyrrole 4, respectively (Scheme 5). The 1,5-isomerization path leads to formaldehyde and ammonia, so that in the presence of silver salt the well-known silver mirror reaction could take place, thus justifying the need of at least one equiv of AgNO3.


Scheme 5: Proposed reaction mechanism for Liu’s synthesis of pyrrole-2-carboxaldehydes 4.

A silver supramolecular complex was proposed by Sun and co-workers as an efficient catalyst for A3-coupling reactions between aldehydes, phenylacetylene and classical secondary amines under mild conditions (i.e., room temperature, open air, chloroform) [18]. The complex was prepared by the reaction of AgNO3 with 1,4-bis(4,5-dihydro-2-oxazolyl)benzene to give a tridimensional supramolecular structure characterized by three-coordinated -[Ag(NO2)]-L- chains, linked together by hydrogen bonds. The complex demonstrated to be more suited to aliphatic than aromatic aldehydes, whereas the presence of an EWG on the aldehyde resulted in low reaction yields.

Gold catalysis

The first example of a gold-catalyzed synthesis of tertiary propargylamines from aldehydes, secondary amines and alkynes was reported by Li and co-workers [19], a bare three months before the work on silver cited above [5]. Both Au(I) and Au(III) salts demonstrated to be effective with low catalyst loading (1 mol %). Surprisingly, water was the solvent of choice, while the employment of common organic solvents gave worse results. The approach tolerated both aromatic and aliphatic alkynes and aldehydes, delivering the corresponding propargylamines 1 with fair to excellent yields. In contrast to the observations in their work on silver-catalyzed A3-coupling, aromatic aldehydes gave better results than aliphatic ones, and the authors ascribed this to the competitive trimerization of aliphatic aldehydes. Moreover, the approach tolerates both cyclic and acyclic aliphatic secondary amines (Scheme 6). The proposed mechanism is similar to the one suggested for the silver-catalyzed approach, involving the activation of the C–H bond of alkyne by an Au(I) species. For the AuBr3-catalyzed reaction, the authors argued that Au(I) could be generated in situ by a reduction of Au(III) from the alkyne.


Scheme 6: Gold-catalyzed synthesis of propargylamines 1.

Starting from this seminal work, many other gold catalysts, including [Au(III)salen] [20] and [Au(III)(2-phenylpyridine)Cl2] [21] complexes, immobilized heterogeneous catalysts [22], and gold nanoparticles (Au NP) [23-26] have been reported until 2010, as well as recognized in two recent exhaustive reviews by Li [2] and Van der Eycken [3]. In the past three years the development of new and effective nanostructured catalytic systems dominated the gold-catalyzed approach to A3-coupling. For example, ultrasmall gold(0) nanoparticles embedded in a mesoporous carbon nitride stabilizer [27] proved to be a highly active, selective and recyclable heterogeneous catalysts for coupling arylaldehydes, piperidine and phenylacetylene in toluene at 100 °C. One year later, the same research group obtained comparable results under identical reaction conditions by using gold(0) nanoparticles stabilized by nanocristalline magnesium oxide [28]. In this work, the scope was thoroughly investigated, and a wide range of aldehydes were tested affording the corresponding propargylamines in good to excellent yield. The method demonstrated to be suitable for challenging substrates, such as highly-activated aldehydes (i.e., nitrobenzaldehydes), whereas sterically demanding ones (i.e., o-substituted benzaldehydes) gave worse results. Other strengths of the approach are the ultralow catalyst loading (0.236 mol % gold) and the great TON (>400).

Periodic mesoporous organosilicas (PMOs), properly functionalized with HS/SO3H [29] or alkylimidazolium [30], were recently used as support for Au NP, and these heterogeneous systems were tested as recyclable catalysts in an A3-coupling. The former was effective in three simple model reactions as a bifunctional catalyst (Au/acid) in aqueous medium at 70 °C. The latter works well in chloroform at 60 °C and tolerates a number of substituted aryl and alkylaldehydes, cyclic secondary amines, and electron-rich arylacetylenes, affording the corresponding tertiary propargylamines in very good yields. On the basis of experiments with a reduced catalytic system and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) the authors suggested that Au(III) is the active component of the catalyst.

A two-step flow process catalyzed by Montmorillonite K-10 (MM K-10) and gold nanoparticles on alumina was proposed by Groß and co-workers [31] to improve the efficiency of traditional A3-MCRs. The flow system allows a fine-tuning of each step, i.e., ethanol as a solvent, 25 °C for aldimine formation (first step) in the MM K-10 containing packed-bed capillary reactor (PBCR), and 80 °C for the reaction with phenylacetylene (second step) in Au NP@Al2O3 containing PBCR. The system, tested with some different aryl/heteroaryl/alkylaldehydes and cyclic/acyclic secondary amines in the presence of phenylacetylene, gave the corresponding coupling products in very good to excellent yields, apart from the reactions with furfural, which obtained low yields.

An intriguing catalytic system composed of zinc oxide supported Au NP, activated by LED irradiation (plasmon mediated catalysis), was recently suggested by the group of Scaiano and González-Béjar [32] as a mild and green system to perform A3-MCRs. The scope was concisely explored crossing three different aldehydes (i.e., benzaldehyde, formaldehyde and 3-methylbutanal) with phenylacetylene, and three cyclic secondary amines. The coupling products were quickly obtained (2 h) at rt with yields ranging from 50 to 95%.

In the field of heterogenized gold complexes, the group of Sánchez and Iglesias [33] prepared a series of Au(I/III) complexes with some known (NHC)dioxolane and pincer-type (NHC)NN ligands, and heterogenized them on a mesoporous support, i.e., MCM-41. The authors tested them in A3-couplings and found that, although under homogeneous conditions the conversion to the respective propargylamine was higher than under heterogeneous ones, the heterogenized complexes were stable, recyclable for at least six cycles, active in a small amount, and under open-air conditions.

Besides the notable growing of heterogeneous catalytic systems, new gold complexes were recently developed as suitable catalysts for A3-MCRs under homogeneous conditions. López-Ortiz and co-workers [34] synthesized an original phosphinamidic Au(III) metallacycle 6 (via tin(IV) precursors) active at low catalyst loadings (1–3%) in acetonitrile at 60 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere. The catalyst was effective with aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes, cyclic secondary amines, and phenyl- or TMS-acetylene providing the corresponding propargylamines 1 in excellent yields (Scheme 7). When enantiomerically pure prolinol was used as amine the process took place with excellent diastereoselectivity (dr 99:1, determined by 1H NMR).


Scheme 7: A3-coupling catalyzed by phosphinamidic Au(III) metallacycle 6.

A series of new imidazole-based phosphane ligands were prepared by the research group of Kunz [35]. The corresponding Au(I) NP complexes displayed a potent catalytic activity in a model A3-coupling reaction. The best result was obtained with 0.5 mol % catalyst at 40 °C without a solvent. The scope and limitations were not investigated.

Bowden and co-workers did not propose a new catalytic system but developed a smart method to extend the lifetimes of gold(III) chloride catalysts in A3-MCRs by the addition of inexpensive and commercially available reagents such as CuCl2 and TEMPO [36]. The proposed rationale seems simple and elegant: the reduction of gold(I) (real active species) to colloidal Au(0) was responsible for the deactivation of the catalyst. CuCl2 was able to reoxidize Au(0) to Au(I) which increased the number of turnovers (up to 33 cycles). The Cu(I) was oxidized back to Cu(II) by TEMPO. Also O2 had a role in this cycle, probably as a reoxidizing agent for TEMPO.

Another challenge in an A3-coupling strategy is its transformation in an effective KA2-MCR, that is, the substitution of aldehyde partners with less reactive ketones. This issue was partially solved by Ji and co-workers, who found with AuBr3 (4 mol %), no-solvent and 60 °C the best conditions to react alkyl ketones, secondary amines and aryl/alkylacetylenes to give the corresponding propargylamines 7 containing a quaternary carbon center [37] (Scheme 8). Aliphatic alkynes and acyclic amines gave the corresponding products in low yields, whereas the methodology was ineffective for aromatic ketones.


Scheme 8: Gold-catalyzed KA2-coupling.

Gold-catalyzed A3-MCRs were also applied with the aim to functionalize particular molecules or were employed as a key step for the synthesis of more complex structures in domino approaches.

For example, Che, Wong and co-workers successfully applied A3-coupling to aldehyde-containing oligosaccharides 8 [38]. The best catalyst for this reaction was 10 mol % of the [Au(C^N)Cl2] complex (HC^N = 2-benzylpyridine) in water at 40 °C. The reaction yields ranged from good to excellent, and the method allowed the introduction of alkynes and amines properly functionalized with particular groups,(i.e., dansyl and biotin), or m/p-ethynylbenzenes, suitable for further orthogonal transformation, i.e., [3 + 2] cycloaddition (Scheme 9).


Scheme 9: A3-coupling applied to aldehyde-containing oligosaccharides 8.

Another application of an A3-MCR for the improvement of molecular complexity was published by Kokezu and Srinivas [39]. The authors suggested a straightforward AuBr3-catalyzed route to 2-, 3-, or 5-propargylamine substituted indoles 9. The reactions were performed in water at 60 °C starting from indolecarboxaldehydes 10, phenyl- and trimethylsilylacetylenes and cyclic/acyclic secondary amines, with the reaction yields ranging from fair to excellent (Scheme 10).


Scheme 10: A3-MCR for the preparation of propargylamine-substituted indoles 9.

Two elegant examples of cascade reactions involving an A3-MCR for the synthesis of valuable heterocyclic scaffolds were recently reported by the research groups of Liu and Fujii/Ohno. The Liu group developed a smart approach to furans starting from arylglyoxals 11, secondary amines and arylacetylenes in methanol under a nitrogen atmosphere [40]. In this reaction, the best catalyst was AuBr3 (5 mol %) and the optimal temperature was 60 °C. The aryl moieties on alkynes and glyoxals tolerated the presence of ED and EW groups. The proposed mechanism implied the coupling among reaction partners to give an α-amino-β,γ-ynone intermediate I capable to undergo a 5-endo-dig cyclization by an intramolecular attack of the oxygen nucleophile to the Au-activated triple bond. Aromatization and protodeauration closed the catalytic cycle to give furans 12 and to regenerate the catalyst (Scheme 11).


Scheme 11: A3-coupling interceded synthesis of furans 12.

A conceptually similar approach – and a comparable mechanism – was proposed by Ohno and Fujii for the synthesis of functionalized dihydropyrazoles 13 starting from aryl/alkylacetylenes, aldehydes – and also more challenging ketones – and N-Boc-N’-substituted hydrazines 14 [41] (Scheme 12). Among several gold complexes tested, best results were obtained with IPrAuCl/AgOTf (2–5 mol %) in DCE (AcOH for aromatic aldehydes) at 50 °C, but also the cheaper Ph3PAuCl/AgOTf gave respectable results. Surprisingly, AuBr3 was not able to promote this cascade reaction. A special feature of this approach is that when R4 is a o-alkynylbenzene a further Au-catalyzed cascade process involving C–H activation can occur to give the corresponding tricyclic naphthalene fused pyrazoles 15 (Scheme 12, path A). Moreover, in a subsequent work, the authors applied the same strategy to obtain pyrazolo[4,3-b]indoles 16, a new class of CK2 inhibitors [42]. These products were obtained starting from properly substituted dihydropyrazoles 13 in which R4 was an o-azidobenzene group by a RuCl3 catalyzed C–H amination (Scheme 12, path B).


Scheme 12: A3/KA2-coupling mediated synthesis of functionalized dihydropyrazoles 13 and polycyclic dihydropyrazoles 15 and 16.

As explained above, A3-MCR is a reaction in which the formation of a metal acetylide and its reaction with an in situ formed iminium cation are the key steps of the process. In the recent literature, there are related cascade multicomponent processes of interest, which involve gold acetylides and imines. Among them, a new Au(I)-catalyzed entry to cyclic carbamimidates 17 starting from acetylenes, imines and p-toluenesulfonylisocyanate (18) was reported by Toste and Campbell [43]. The reaction gave mainly the 5-membered carbamimidates 17 besides a variable amount of the 6-membered analog 19 (Scheme 13). The reaction partners, the more suitable catalytic system, the ratio among reagents and other reaction conditions were carefully chosen by a series of extensive experiments. In particular, the highly electrophilic p-toluenesulfonylisocyanate (18) is essential for the formation of the key intermediate. Moreover, the formation of the five-membered product 17 is thermodynamically favored by the use of small ligands in the Au complex. Only aryl substituents were well tolerated on imine and alkyne reaction partners, but imines bearing hindered ortho substituents or too electron-rich imines were not allowed. The reaction with alkylacetylenes( i.e., 1-hexyne), resulted in low yields and selectivity (Scheme 13).


Scheme 13: Au(I)-catalyzed entry to cyclic carbamimidates 17 via an A3-coupling-type approach.

The proposed mechanism is shown in Scheme 14. The coordination of acetylene to gold produces the alkyne π-complex I with the acidification of the acetylenic hydrogen atom. Deprotonation by the imine produces the electrophilic iminium ion with simultaneous production of the Au(I)-acetylide II. An addition reaction produces propargylamine III and regenerates the gold cation. Amine III is trapped with p-TsNCO 18 to generate the acyclic urea IV, and the alkyne moiety of IV coordinates to gold to form a new alkyne π-complex V. A 5-exo-dig cyclization by nucleophilic attack of the urea oxygen forms the vinylgold carbamimidinium ion VI (the minor 6-endo-dig 19 product is not shown), which undergoes proton transfer to release the product 17 and regenerates the Au(I) catalyst.


Scheme 14: Proposed reaction mechanism for the Au(I)-catalyzed synthesis of cyclic carbamimidates 17.

The authors also developed an enantioselective version of the approach. After an in-depth preliminary screening, the catalyst and the optimal reaction conditions were found to be the original arylsulfonylurea-containing trans-1-diphenylphosphino-2-aminocyclohexane–Au(I) complex 20 (Figure 2), AgNTf2 as an additive, toluene as a solvent, rt, and a concentration of imine above 0.2 M. The obtained ee ranged from 41 to 95%.


Figure 2: Chiral trans-1-diphenylphosphino-2-aminocyclohexane–Au(I) complex 20.

In a similar approach, Strand and co-workers [44] worked out a new entry to oxazoles 21 starting from terminal alkynes, N-benzylimines and acid chlorides. The reaction was catalyzed by a Au(III)–salen complex 22 and occurred in acetonitrile at 170 °C under dielectric heating (Scheme 15).


Scheme 15: A3-coupling-type synthesis of oxazoles 21 catalyzed by Au(III)–salen complex.

On the basis of the results of some smart kinetic experiments on ad-hoc synthetized plausible intermediates (III and V) in the presence of different amounts of catalyst (from 0 to 10 mol %) and/or 2,6-lutidine hydrochloride as a suitable proton source, the authors proposed the mechanism depicted in Scheme 16. The process involves the addition of gold-acetylide I to the activated N-acyliminium salt II resulting from the reaction between acyl chloride and imine, to give the propargylamide III. The proton released during the formation of the acetylide I activates the triple bond of propargylamide III which undergoes the attack from the amide oxygen atom. The benzyl group of the resultant iminium ion IV is lost as benzyl chloride by reaction with the chloride ion released during the initial imine acylation. Finally, a combination between Brønsted acid and metal catalysis, promote the isomerization of V to oxazole 21. It is noteworthy, that the gold catalyst seemed to be essential only for the formation of the gold-acetylide intermediate I.


Scheme 16: Proposed reaction mechanism for the synthesis of oxazoles 21.

In a different approach strictly related to Au-catalyzed A3-coupling, Wang and co-workers substituted the classical amine partner with triethyl orthoformate (23) to give the corresponding propargyl ethyl ethers 24 [45] (Scheme 17). After a brief screening for the best reaction conditions (i.e., AuPPh3Cl/AgOTf (5 mol %), DCE heated under reflux), the scope was investigated and best results were obtained when the reaction partners were substituted with aryl groups. In particular, the reaction of cyclohexanecarbaldehyde resulted in fair yield whereas p-nitrobenzaldehyde and pyridinecarbaldehyde did not react at all. During their investigations, the authors observed that AuPPh3/AgOTf was able to catalyze the reaction of benzaldehyde with triethyl orthoformate (23) to give the corresponding aldehyde diethylacetal. Consequently, the proposed mechanism involves the addition of the gold acetylide I to the C=O bond of an oxocarbenium intermediate II, formed by a Au-catalyzed reaction between aldehydes and orthoformate 23.


Scheme 17: Synthesis of propargyl ethyl ethers 24 by an A3-coupling-type reaction.

Other multicomponent processes

Silver assisted multicomponent reactions

Newly reported and notable synthetic strategies based on silver-mediated processes are discussed in this chapter. Silver-mediated MCRs mainly take advantage by the well-known π- and σ-philic properties of Ag(I) salts and complexes [46-48]. Thus, coordination and activation of both carbon–carbon multiple bonds or heteroatoms fulfill a MC process involving more than one chemical transformation or reaction mechanism. This part of the review is divided in sections related to the nature of the activated functionalities.

Reaction involving activation of carbon–carbon multiple bonds. This section primarily discusses cycloisomerization reactions involving the addition of imines to silver-activated carbon–carbon triple bonds [49]. Imine-based MCRs have received considerable attention in recent years [50]. The increasing interest in imine-based MCRs can be attributed to the easy preparation (even in situ) of many differently substituted derivatives from commercially available aldehydes and amines. This leads to great chemical diversity of the products of MCRs. Moreover, imines can participate in MCRs as electrophilic or nucleophilic partners, azadienes, dienophiles and 1,3-dipoles. All these reactions may benefit from the presence of a Lewis acid, a Brønsted acid or a transition metal catalyst. Silver-catalyzed MCRs involving imines in cycloisomerization reactions follow the main reaction pathway shown in Scheme 18.


Scheme 18: General mechanism of Ag(I)-catalyzed MCRs of 2-alkynylbenzaldehydes, amines and nucleophiles.

Starting from a γ-ketoalkyne [51] encompassed in a (hetero)aromatic framework, a condensation step with a suitable G–NH2 group (amine or hydrazine) provides the imine intermediate, which undergoes a silver-catalyzed 6-endo-dig cyclization, thus giving rise to a key iminium intermediate suitable to react with a third nucleophilic component (Nu in Scheme 18). In these reactions the imine acts as a nucleophile and the silver serves as a π-philic catalyst enhancing the reactivity of the triple bond toward the nucleophile. A role of the silver salt as Lewis acid in the condensation step between amine and carbonyl group has never been claimed even though it could be plausible [52]. This chemistry has been exhaustively evaluated by Wu’s group, whose main interest was the development of new MCRs as a powerful tool for the synthesis of medium-sized libraries of bioactive compounds. Thus, straightforward syntheses of 1,3-disubstituted-1,2-dihydroisoquinolines have been achieved by three-component reactions between alkynylbenzaldehydes 25 (γ-carbonylalkyne), primary amines 26 (mainly anilines) and a third nucleophilic reagent (Nu) in the presence of a silver triflate catalyst (Scheme 19).


Scheme 19: General synthetic pathway to 1,3-disubstituted-1,2-dihydroisoquinolines.

All reported reactions share the same key iminium intermediate 28 generated in situ from imine 27 via a silver triflate catalyzed 6-endo cyclization, but differ in the third reaction partner (Scheme 20 and Scheme 21). This can be a simple nucleophile (indole 30, imidazole 31, diethyl phosphite (32), Scheme 20) [53-55] or can be generated in situ (enolate 33, enamine 34, Scheme 21) [56,57] from a suitable precursor and a second catalyst (dual activation strategy) affording 1,3-disubstituted-1,2-dihydroisoquinolines 29, 35 and 36, respectively. The author suggested a mechanism that, starting from iminium intermediate 28, involves the nucleophilic addition on the electrophilic carbon atom of 28 and a protodemetalation yielding the desired 1,2-dihydroquinolines 29, 35 and 36. The annulation step giving rise to 28, and the nucleophilic attack on the imine C=N bond could also be synchronized. The two proposed mechanisms are described in Scheme 20 and Scheme 21, respectively.


Scheme 20: Synthesis of 1,3-disubstituted-1,2-dihydroisoquinolines 29.


Scheme 21: Synthesis of 1,3-disubstituted-1,2-dihydroisoquinolines 35 and 36.

The scope of these reactions has been examined with a wide range of substrates. Therefore, 2-alkynylbenzaldehydes can be functionalized on the aryl ring with EWG or EDG, the former better performing than the latter. However, a serious limitation on the substituents on the triple bond has been reported. Thus, phenyl and more generally aryl substituents on the triple bond are well tolerated whereas alkyl groups gave poor results. Both electron-rich and electron-poor anilines are suitable partners for these reactions, whereas alkylamines and benzylamine gave worse results. Moreover, the third partner (Nu in Scheme 19) is limited to one substrate as in the reaction employing diethyl phosphite (32). Indoles 30 and imidazoles 31 can bear several substituents and enolates 33 can be generated from methyl- or ethyl vinyl ketone, the corresponding α,β-unsaturated esters being unreactive. Enamines 34 arise from cyclic or linear C3–C5 ketones, acetophenones and β-diketones. It is noteworthy, that the reactions are highly regiospecific for nonsymmetric ketones. Moreover, an optical active compound could be generated during the reaction process since a chiral catalyst (proline) is used in the reactions. However, enantioselectivity was not observed by chiral HPLC analysis, and 3-pentanone gives rise to a mixture of diastereoisomers.

Following this synthetic strategy, a solution-phase parallel synthesis of 1,2-dihydroisoquinolines has been developed by Larock, providing a 105-membered library for biological assays [58]. Moreover, an extension to γ-ketoalkyne encompassed in diverse heterocyclic frameworks (quinoline, pyridine or benzo[b]thiophene) has been reported [59].

Preformed 2-(1-alkynyl)arylaldimines 27 have been used in a MCR involving tandem cyclization/three-component reactions with diazo compounds 37 and water or alcohols 38 in the presence of dirhodium acetate and silver triflate cooperative catalysis resulting in excellent yields of diastereoisomeric 1,2-dihydroisoquinolines 40 (Scheme 22) [60].


Scheme 22: Rh(II)/Ag(I) co-catalyzed synthesis of 1,3-disubstituted-1,2-dihydroisoquinolines 40.

Iminium intermediate 28, generated in situ from the aldimine 27 under silver triflate catalysis is the usual electrophilic intermediate, whereas the nucleophile, in this case, is the oxonium ylide 39. The reaction resulted in the synthesis of highly substituted 1,2-dihydroisoquinolines 40 characterized by the presence of an α-hydroxy/alkoxy-α-carboxylate carbon pendant. The oxonium ylide 39 was prepared by a well-known procedure involving a rhodium carbenoid intermediate, generated in situ from the corresponding diazoacetate 37 under Rh2(OAc)4 catalysis, and water or alcohols 38. The scope of the reaction was thoroughly investigated. Thus, methyl aryl diazoacetates and N-aryl aldimines, with electronically diverse metha or para-substituents on the aryl moieties, as well as ethyl 2-diazobutanoate gave good results, only nitro and ortho-substituted aryl derivatives were unreactive. Interestingly, two stereocenters are generated during the reactions. However, the observed diastereoselectivities were poor, ranging from 50:50 to 76:24.

MCRs yielding isoquinoline cores are well documented in the literature and several examples involving alkynylbenzaldehydes and G–NH2 groups under palladium/copper [61,62], copper [63,64], copper/magnesium [65], or base [66] catalysis have been reported.

When tosylhydrazide (41) is used as G–NH2 component, the silver promoted MCR can afford 2-amino-1,3-disubstituted-1,2-dihydroquinolines and, when the third component (Nu) bears the appropriate substituents, to polycyclic derivatives (Scheme 23).


Scheme 23: General synthetic pathway to 2-amino-1,2-dihydroquinolines.

The reactions between 2-alkynylbenzaldehydes 25 and tosylhydrazide (41) afford the corresponding hydrazono derivatives 42, which, in turn, yield the isoquinolinium-2-ylamides 43 under silver triflate catalysis (Scheme 24). These new key intermediates encompass the structural motif C=N+–N, a very useful framework for further functionalizations. Wu and co-workers widely used preformed N’-(2-alkynylbenzylidene)hydrazides 42 in two component reactions involving 43 as an intermediate for the construction of N-heterocycles. Moreover, in the field of MCRs, in 2010 the same authors assembled a small library of 2-amino-1,2-dihydroisoquinolines 47 starting from N’-(2-alkynylbenzylidene)hydrazides 42, methanol and α,β-unsaturated aldehydes 44. The three-component process is co-catalyzed by silver triflate and an N-heterocyclic carbene. (Scheme 24) [67].


Scheme 24: Synthesis of 2-amino-1,2-dihydroquinolines 47.

As mentioned above, N’-(2-alkynylbenzylidene)hydrazide 42 could easily be transformed to isoquinolinium-2-ylamide 43 by a 6-endo-cyclization in the presence of silver triflate catalyst. Meanwhile, the in situ formed homoenolate 45 (derived from α,β-unsaturated aldehydes 44 in the presence of NHC catalyst, IPr) would attack the isoquinolinium-2-ylamide 43 to generate the new intermediate 46. Subsequently, methanol would be involved in the reaction via deprotonation and the nucleophilic addition to the carbonyl group to produce the desired 2-amino-1,2-dihydroisoquinoline 47. Concurrently, the released N-heterocyclic carbene would re-enter the catalytic cycle. Nevertheless, the reaction suffers from severe limitation on the nature of the R1 group attached to the triple bond of N′-(2-alkynylbenzylidene)hydrazides 42 and only aryl groups proofed to be effective. Broadening the scope of this transformation, the same authors reinvestigated the reaction on the preformed isoquinolinium-2-ylamide 43 (R = H, R1 = cyclopropyl) with cinnamaldehyde and methanol under silver triflate catalysis [68]. The avoidance of the use of IPr and the usage of 2 equiv of potassium hydroxide leads to a different reaction mechanism and allows for the synthesis of tricyclic H-pyrazolo[5,1-a]isoquinoline 48 (Scheme 25).


Scheme 25: Synthesis of tricyclic H-pyrazolo[5,1-a]isoquinoline 48.

With these results in hand, a MCR involving 2-alkynylbenzaldehydes 25, tosylhydrazide (41), methanol and α,β-unsaturated aldehydes or ketones 49 was set up to synthesize a library of 24 H-pyrazolo[5,1-a]isoquinolines 48 under silver triflate catalysis (Scheme 26).


Scheme 26: Synthesis of tricyclic H-pyrazolo[5,1-a]isoquinolines 48.

The synthesis of both 1,2-dihydroquinolines 47 and 48 takes advantage from the easy formation of the isoquinolinium-2-ylamide 43 under silver triflate catalysis. This intermediate can be trapped by other nucleophilic reagents (enamines and carbanions) or be involved in cycloaddition reactions affording tricyclic compounds by cascade processes.

An unprecedented, co-catalyzed reaction involving enamines 51 as nucleophilic partners, also yields the H-pyrazolo[5,1-a]isoquinoline nucleus 48, in the presence of silver triflate and copper(II) chloride under air (Scheme 27) [69]. However, with respect to the reaction reported in Scheme 26, also affording isoquinolines of general formula 48, a diverse arrangement of substituents can be achieved.


Scheme 27: Cu(II)/Ag(I) catalyzed synthesis of H-pyrazolo[5,1-a]isoquinolines 48.

The proposed reaction mechanism takes into account the recent applications of an oxygen-copper catalytic system for the oxidation of aliphatic C–H bonds [70]. Thus, oxidation of the aliphatic C–H bond, alpha to the reacting amine 50, resulted in the formation of nucleophilic enamine 51, which is able to react with the isoquinolinium-2-ylamide 43, thereby affording a tricyclic intermediate, which by loss of the tosyl group and base-catalyzed aromatization yields the H-pyrazolo[5,1-a]isoquinoline 48.

Finally, a new series of fully aromatic pyrazolo[5,1-a]isoquinolines 53, bearing an amino group in position 2 can be synthesized under silver triflate catalysis by the usual three-component reaction involving nitriles 52 as pro-nucleophiles (Scheme 28) [71].


Scheme 28: Synthesis of 2-aminopyrazolo[5,1-a]isoquinolines 53.

Wu and co-workers successfully employed the isoquinolinium-2-ylamides 43 as an ylidic species in two-component tandem [3 + 2]-cycloaddition reactions with a series of substrates including dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate [72], phenylacetylene [73,74], and methyl acrylate [75]. Starting from these results, a MC approach to 1-(isoquinolin-1-yl)guanidines 55 was efficiently developed by a silver triflate-catalyzed three-component reaction of 2-alkynylbenzaldehydes 25, tosylhydrazide (41) and carbodiimides 54 (Scheme 29) [76].


Scheme 29: Synthesis of 1-(isoquinolin-1-yl)guanidines 55.

The isoquinolinium-2-ylamide 43 undergoes a [3 + 2]-cycloaddition reaction with carbodiimide 54. Further intramolecular rearrangement yields the desired 1-(isoquinolin-1-yl)guanidine 55.

Moreover, isoquinolinium-2-ylamides 43 can participate as 1,3-dipoles in [3 + 2]-cycloaddition reactions with in situ generated keteneimines 57 [77] or in [3 + 3] processes with dimethyl cyclopropane-1,1-dicarboxylates 59 [78]. Both these reactions are co-catalyzed, the former by silver triflate and copper bromide and the latter by silver triflate and nickel(II) perchlorate (Scheme 30 and Scheme 31).


Scheme 30: Ag(I)/Cu(I) catalyzed synthesis of 2-amino-H-pyrazolo[5,1-a]isoquinolines 58.


Scheme 31: Ag(I)/Ni(II) co-catalyzed synthesis of 3,4-dihydro-1H-pyridazino[6,1-a]isoquinoline-1,1-dicarboxylate 60.

In [3 + 2]-cycloaddition reactions between isoquinolinium-2-ylamide 43 and keteneimine 57 [79], silver salt plays the usual role of a π-philic catalyst, whereas ketene imine 57 is generated by a well-known procedure involving a copper(I)-catalyzed azide–alkyne [3 + 2] cycloaddition (CuAAC) giving rise to 5-cuprated triazole intermediate 56 which, by subsequent ring opening and loss of nitrogen gas, smoothly resulted in ketenimine 57 [80]. The overall process proceeds efficiently to generate the 2-amino-H-pyrazolo[5,1-a]isoquinolines 58 in moderate to excellent yields under mild conditions and with good substrate tolerance.

The co-catalyzed process described in Scheme 31 takes advantage of the usual formation of 43 which undergoes a [3 + 3]-cycloaddition reaction with cyclopropanes 59 under nickel perchlorate catalysis. Cycloaddition reactions of activated cyclopropanes with nitrones under Lewis acid catalysis have been previously described by Kerr and may proceed on the activated cyclopropane by a stepwise or concerted mechanism [81]. Similar mechanisms could be also operative in the reaction of ylidic species 43 for the synthesis of 60. Good substrate tolerance and moderate to excellent yields are reported.

Reactions involving σ-activation of carbon and heteroatoms. This section gives an overview of the multifaceted field of silver-catalyzed processes involving a σ-activation of carbon or heteroatoms. We focus on Mannich-type reactions characterized by the addition of a nucleophile to an imine. In several MCRs with this type of reactivity, silver(I) salts and complexes have been used to activate either the nucleophile or the imine.

Isocyanides have been found to be versatile reagents in heterocyclic synthesis [82,83]. In particular, the α-metallation of isocyanides was accomplished by Schöllkopf [84] and Van Leusen [85] for the synthesis of the imidazole core structure via a Mannich-type condensation of imines. An alternative method to activate the α-carbon atom of an isocyanide group as a nucleophile is the coordination of a metal at the terminal carbon in the isocyanide group resulting in an increase in the acidity of the α-protons and thus allowing for an easy α-deprotonation with weak bases (Scheme 32) [86,87].


Scheme 32: Ag(I) promoted activation of the α-carbon atom of the isocyanide group.

Recently, Orru’s group successfully translated the stepwise Schöllkopf–Van Leusen synthesis of dihydroimidazoles 65 in a MCR involving isocyanides 61, aldehydes 62 and primary amines 63 [88]. Initial results, obtained in the presence of a simple dehydrating agent, were limited to the use of simple aldehydes, amines and α-acidic α,α-disubstituted isocyanides such as methyl isocyano(phenyl)acetate and 9-isocyano-9H-fluorene [89]. The scope of these reactions could be extended to isocyanides with other substituents by using methanol as a solvent. Further improvements can be achieved in the presence of a catalytic amount of AgOAc acting as a Lewis acid to improve the α-acidity of the isocyanide component. However, the presence of an electron withdrawing group in α-position of 61 is essential in any case (Scheme 33) [90,91].


Scheme 33: Synthesis of dihydroimidazoles 65.

The reaction occurs via a Mannich-type addition of the deprotonated isocyanide intermediate 64 to an in situ generated iminium salt, a subsequent intramolecular cyclization and proton shift results in dihydroimidazole 65 showing predominantly cis-arrangment around the C4–C5 bond. However, an alternative reaction pathway, involving a concerted [3 + 2] cycloaddition of 64 to the imine, cannot be ruled out. Additionally, the use of sterically demanding amines results in lower yields. It is noteworthy, that the same reactions performed in the presence of a weak Brønsted acid instead of Ag(I) leads to oxazoles 68 when isocyano amides or isocyano esters 66 were used as substrates. The reaction proceeds through the formation of iminium ion 67 [92]. The isocyanide carbon atom is sufficiently nucleophilic to attack iminium ion 67. Subsequent deprotonation and cyclization yields oxazoles 68 (Scheme 34).


Scheme 34: Synthesis of oxazoles 68.

Another cluster of silver-mediated Mannich-type reactions involves the enantioselective addition of siloxyfurans 70 to imines 69 (vinylogous Mannich reaction, VM) affording chiral butenolide derivatives 71 (Scheme 35). The reaction proceeds in the presence of amino acid-based chiral phosphine ligands and AgOAc via bidentate chelation of a properly substituted aldimine. Chiral phosphine–silver(I) complexes are emerging as a valuable tool for carbon–carbon bond forming reactions. These catalysts are effective in promoting enantioselective allylations, aldol reactions, Mannich-type reactions, hetero Diels–Alder reactions, 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions and nitroso aldol reactions [93]. The process was firstly accomplished with preformed aryl-substituted aldimines [94] and then developed as a MCR for less stable alkyl-substituted aldimines, which were prepared in situ from arylamines 72 and alkylaldehydes 73 to avoid decomposition [95]. Scheme 35 shows the general reaction outcome for both processes.


Scheme 35: Stereoselective synthesis of chiral butenolides 71.

The two main features of the reported three-component Ag-catalyzed process are (i) the mild reaction conditions and (ii) the high degree of diastereo- and enantioselectivity. The VM process can be performed with linear, cyclic, α-branched, β-branched and tert-butylaldehydes as well as with heteroatom-containing aldehydes. Hence, COOMe, OBn and NHBoc substituents are well tolerated and afford the corresponding butenolide derivatives in moderate yields (44–56%). Moreover, the N-aryl group can be easily removed from the final compounds under oxidative conditions yielding the corresponding amino compounds.

An OMe substituent is essential as a directing group for aryl-substituted aldimines. Thus, the Lewis acidic chiral complex may associate with the aldimine substrate through bidentate chelation (Scheme 36). The substrate is bound anti to the bulky amino acid substituent (R) and reacts with the siloxyfuran via endo-type addition. Intramolecular silyl transfer, iPrOH mediated desilylation of the amide terminus, and protonation of the N–Ag bond delivers the final product and the catalyst. Such a pathway is not allowed for the siloxyfuran bearing a methyl group in position 3, which reacts by an exo addition. Alkyl-substituted aldimines can also participate in these reactions. However, they must be generated in situ (MCR). In the latter reactions, best results were obtained when arylamines 72 bear an o-thiomethyl and a p-methoxy substituent instead of a single o-methoxy substituent. The corresponding electron-rich aldimines are less electrophilic and subsequently more stable under the reported reaction conditions. Moreover, the authors report on a more effective association of the “softer” chelating heteroatom (sulfur) with the late transition metal, which in turn resulted in improved enantiodifferentiation via a more organized transition state.


Scheme 36: Proposed reaction mechanism for the synthesis of butenolides 71.

Two more examples of enantioselective reactions involving silver catalysts have been recently reported. Both reactions involve amines, aldehydes and alkenes in a three-component reaction based on the cascade imine formation, azomethine ylide generation and [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction for the synthesis of pyrrolidines. However, the adopted method to induce chirality in the final products is rather dissimilar. Thus, in 2006 Garner’s group reported the synthesis of highly functionalized pyrrolidines 77 in a MCR involving classical aliphatic aldehydes 74, chiral glycyl sultam 75 and activated alkenes 76 (Scheme 37) [96].


Scheme 37: Stereoselective three-component approach to pirrolidines 77 by means of a chiral auxiliary.

The Oppolzer’s camphorsultam, incorporated in the amine 75 by means of an amide linkage, plays two different roles. On the one hand, as an electron withdrawing group, it decreases the nucleophilicity of the amine, thus avoiding the formation of detrimental Michael-type adducts with the alkene. On the other hand, it increases the α-acidity of the imine intermediate, thus favoring the azomethine ylide formation. Moreover, as a chiral auxiliary it promotes the cycloaddition governing the stereochemistry of the process. The chiral auxiliary can be removed at the end of the reaction. Another interesting peculiarity concerns the exceptionally mild reaction conditions preventing unwanted aldehyde/enol or imine/enamine tautomerization.

Instead, an Ag(I) complex based on BINAP and AgSbF6 was employed as a catalyst for the enantioselective 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction of azomethine ylides and alkenes for the synthesis of pyrrolidines 81 and 82 (Scheme 38) [97]. The reaction was developed mainly as a two-component reaction and only two examples of MC approaches have been included in the manuscript. The reported examples involve (hetero)aryl aldehydes 77, methyl glycinate (78) and maleimide 79 or (E)-1,2-bis(phenylsulfonyl)ethylene (80) as electrophilic alkenes.


Scheme 38: Stereoselective three-component approach to pyrrolidines 81 and 82 by means of a chiral catalyst.

The reported work is an extension of a previous paper dealing with the use of BINAP–AgClO4 as a chiral catalyst in the same two-component reaction [98]. Higher enantioselectivities were rarely observed with SbF6 being the weaker coordinating counter ion.

An interesting application of silver catalysis in the allene chemistry field has been recently proposed by Jia and co-workers [99]. The authors got inspired by the recent development of the phosphine-catalyzed [3 + 2] cycloaddition of allenoates with electron-deficient species such as olefins and imines, which involves the in situ formation of a zwitterionic intermediate from the nucleophilic addition between allenoate and phosphine. Thus, they believed that new cycloaddition reactions could be accessed if isocyanide was employed as a nucleophile instead of phosphine. The developed reaction allows the synthesis of five-membered carbocycles 86 by the silver hexafluoroantimonate-catalyzed three-component [2 + 2 + 1] cycloaddition of allenoates 84, dual activated olefins 85, and isocyanides 83 (Scheme 39).


Scheme 39: Synthesis of substituted five-membered carbocyles 86.

It is noteworthy, that only the external double bond of the allenic fragment is embedded in the final carbocyclic ring, whereas in the phosphine-catalyzed [3 + 2] cycloadditon process the allene moiety behaves as a traditional “three-carbon atom unit”. This behavior originates from the involvement of the isocyanide in the cyclization step.

Reactions involving organosilver reagents. Information about organosilver compound chemistry with respect to the coordination chemistry of silver salts and complexes is scarce in the literature. This could be related to the lower stability of these compounds, increasing in the order Csp3–Ag, Csp2–Ag, Csp–Ag, compared to other organometallic compounds. The majority of the screened literature discusses the use of organosilver compounds as reagents. A recent review on organosilver compounds by Pouwer and Williams exhaustively highlights all these aspects of silver chemistry [100].

For example, functionalized propiolic acids can be selectively prepared by an AgI catalyzed carboxylation of terminal alkynes with CO2 under ligand free conditions with the intermediacy of an organosilver compound, namely silver acetilide (Csp–Ag) [101]. The direct carboxylation of active C–H bonds of (hetero)arenes [102] and terminal alkynes [103] with CO2 in the presence of copper or gold-based catalysts has also been reported. However, these latter transformations require expensive ligands and often harsh bases, whereas the silver-mediated process depends on a simple but efficient catalyst such as AgI and Cs2CO3 as base. This feature has been clearly highlighted by Anastas who realized the multicomponent synthesis of regioisomeric arylnaphthalene lactones 89 and 90 from arylacetylenes 87, carbon dioxide and 3-bromo-1-aryl-1-propynes 88 (Scheme 40) [104]. In the reaction sequence a 1,6-diyne was generated in situ and cyclized to afford the two possible regioisomeric compounds. The level of regioselectivity can be enhanced by the tuning of electronic properties of the reactant species. AgI/K2CO3 and in a greener and more efficient protocol AgI/K2CO3/18-crown-6 with 3-chloro-1-phenyl-1-propyne have been employed (Scheme 40). The latter approach was successfully adopted for the preparation of dehydrodimethylconidendrin and dehydrodimethylretroconidendrin.


Scheme 40: Synthesis of regioisomeric arylnaphthalene lactones.

Gold-assisted multicomponent reactions

In gold(I) and gold(III)-catalyzed reactions the metal acts as a carbophilic Lewis acid, facilitating nucleophilic addition to unsaturated systems. Moreover, also the oxophilic character of gold species has been highlighted by several authors. More recently, gold-promoted transformations involving higher oxidation states from Au(I) precatalysts have been achieved by the addition of a stoichiometric oxidant enabling two-electron redox cycles typically exhibited by other late transition metals. With respect to Ag(I)-mediated MCRs, less information can be found in the literature about the corresponding gold-mediated processes. Thus, major research efforts have been directed to the development of tandem, sequential or cascade reactions and to the area of asymmetric transformations. As reported for silver, this part of the review is divided in sections relating to the nature of the activated functionalities.

Reactions involving the activation of carbon–carbon multiple bonds. One of the most important reactions in gold-catalyzed synthesis is the addition of heteroatoms (O–H, N–H, C=O, C=N) to C–C triple bonds. The reactions take advantage from the high functional group tolerance and from the generally mild reaction conditions. MCRs involving this kind of reactions, however, are primarily limited to the nucleophilic addition of O–H and C=O functionalities to the Au-coordinated alkynes for the synthesis of spiroacetals, cyclic ketals and β-alkoxy ketones. The research group of Fañanás and Rodríguez [105] and the group of Gong [106] independently reported the enantioselective synthesis of spiroacetals 96 and 101 by a three-component reaction involving alkynols 91, anilines and an α-hydroxy acid or β-hydroxyaldehydes (glyoxylic acid (93) or salicylaldehydes 99), (Scheme 41 and Scheme 42, respectively). Both methodologies involve the in situ generation of a gold–phosphate complex by a reaction between (JohnPhos)AuMe and the Brønsted acid (XH) with release of a molecule of methane. These are the first examples of an intermolecular catalytic asymmetric synthesis of spiroacetals. Previously reported methodologies involved preformed substrates in intramolecular reactions [107-109].


Scheme 41: Enantioselective synthesis of spiroacetals 96 by Fañanás and Rodríguez [105].


Scheme 42: Enantioselective synthesis of spiroacetals 101 by Gong [106].

The synthetic approach proposed by Fañanás and Rodríguez involves the coordination of the gold cation to the carbon–carbon triple bond of alkynol 91 followed by an intramolecular exo-addition of the hydroxy group to the alkyne which delivers the exocyclic enol ether 92 regenerating the gold-derived catalyst. The condensation reaction between glyoxylic acid (93) and aniline gives rise to imine 94 which, by double interaction with the gold phosphate, leads to an activated species. Subsequent nucleophilic addition of 92 to 94 gives oxonium intermediate 95, which provides the final product 96 upon cyclization regenerating the catalyst. Interestingly, in the first catalytic cycle the main role of the catalyst is played by its cationic part, the gold(I) ion, being responsible for the activation of the alkynol 91. Meanwhile, in the second catalytic cycle, the main role is played by the anionic part of the catalyst, the phosphate, creating the appropriate chiral environment to produce the final enantioenriched product. The model proposed for the chiral phosphoric acid catalyzed reactions between glyoxylates and enecarbamates is reported in Scheme 41 (see box). The key feature is the formation of a double hydrogen-bonded complex in which only the si face is fully accessible for the enol ether attack to afford the final cyclization product 96.

As reported in Scheme 42 the method proposed by Gong and co-workers allows for the synthesis of aromatic spiroacetals 101. The key step of the sequence is again the addition of an enol ether to an imine followed by an intramolecular cyclization reaction. The enol ether 98 is generated from ortho-alkynylbenzyl alcohol 97 under gold catalysis, and the imine 100 from salicylaldehyde 99 and aniline. Under the catalysis of a chiral Brønsted acid the reaction results in the synthesis of the corresponding chiral aromatic spiroacetals 101.

The MC synthesis of bi- and tricyclic ketals 103 and 104 takes advantage from a mechanism involving the oxyauration of a carbon–carbon triple bond [110]. Thus, starting from 4-acyl-1,6-diynes 102, H2O and alkanols, under AuCl3-catalysis, polyfunctionalized fused bicyclic ketals 103 and bridged tricyclic ketals 104 have been prepared with a high degree of regio- and diastereocontrol. (Scheme 43).


Scheme 43: Synthesis of polyfunctionalized fused bicyclic ketals 103 and bridged tricyclic ketals 104.

The reaction course can be directed toward the formation of 103 and 104 by a fine-tuning of the reaction conditions. The reactions were performed with AuCl3 at a catalyst loading of 3 and 5 mol %, respectively, with 1 equivalent of 102 in alkanol/water (8 mL; 25:1) (Scheme 44).


Scheme 44: Proposed reaction mechanism for the synthesis of ketals 103 and 104.

Under the optimized reaction conditions mentioned above, a double oxyauration reaction leads to intermediate I. The addition of water then results in the formal hydration of I affording dicarbonyl compound II. The subsequent addition of alcohol and the hydrochloric acid release affords the intermediate auric complex III, from which cyclic ketals 103 and 104 are formed by the inter- or intramolecular addition of alcohol, respectively. The proposed reaction mechanism also accounts for the high degree of diastereoselectivity, which can be rationalized by a series of intramolecular chiral inductions.

Finally, Wolfe and co-workers recently described a nice Au(I)-catalyzed MCR of readily available aldehydes, alcohols and alkynes for the synthesis of β-alkoxy ketones 108 [111]. The initial steps of the MCR encompass the Au(I)-catalyzed hydration of the alkyne to give the ketone 105 and the conversion of the aldehyde to the corresponding acetal 106. The Au(I)-catalyzed ionization of the acetal then provides the oxocarbenium ion 107, which is captured by the enol tautomer of ketone 105 (Scheme 45).


Scheme 45: Synthesis of β-alkoxyketones 108.

The authors reported a nice investigation of the involved reaction mechanism and carried out a catalytic screening devoted to the selection of the best catalytic system and optimal reaction conditions. The involvement of a protic acid (HNTf2) or AgNTf2 (used for catalyst preparation) was ruled out as control experiments performed under HNTf2 catalysis did not afford the β-alkoxy ketones 108.

Newly reported examples of gold-catalyzed multicomponent reactions encompass the synthesis of nitrogen containing heterocycles, namely N-substituted 1,4-dihydropyridines [112] and tetrahydrocarbazoles [113]. The first example takes advantage of the ability of a cationic gold(I) catalyst to promote the formation of a new C–N bond through the hydroamination of a carbon–carbon triple bond. The three-component reaction includes methanamine (109), activated alkynes 110 and aldehydes 111 as reactants, a cationic gold(I) complex generated in situ from (triphenylphosphine)gold chloride and silver triflate as a catalyst, and KHCO3 as base. The reaction was performed in 1,4-dioxane at 100 °C and smoothly produces polysubstituted N-methyl-1,4-dihydropyridines 112 in good yields (Scheme 46).


Scheme 46: Synthesis of N-methyl-1,4-dihydropyridines 112.

The scope of the reaction was limited to the use of methanamine as a nucleophilic partner, whereas a great variety of aldehydes can be employed, aromatic, heteroaromatic, aliphatic and α,β-unsaturated aldheydes. Methyl but-2-ynoate and 1,3-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-one were tested as alkynylic counterparts. A tentative mechanistic explanation for the formation of compounds 112 was proposed by the authors. In an early stage, their theory involves a hydroamination reaction between the alkyne 110 and an enamine generated in situ by a Michael-type addition of the amine 109 on the activated carbon–carbon triple bond of a second molecule of 110 (see box in Scheme 46). The overall process closely reminds of a modified Hantzsch synthesis of dihydropyridines.

Furthermore, among unsaturated substrates involved in gold-catalyzed MCRs, allenes could offer an incomparable versatility since they participate in [2 + 2], [4 + 2] or [4 + 3] cyclizations [114,115]. However, they have been employed in a MC process only recently [113]. A gold-catalyzed formal [4 + 2] cycloaddition of vinylindoles 113 and N-allenamides 114 leading to tetrahydrocarbazoles has been described. An appropriate selection of the reaction conditions enabled the selective preparation of isomeric tetrahydrocarbazoles 115 and 116 or carbazole derivatives 117 arising from an unusual gold-catalyzed multicomponent cycloaddition cascade sequence with the participation of two allene molecules (Scheme 47).


Scheme 47: Synthesis of tetrahydrocarbazoles 115–117.

Tetrahydrocarbazoles 115 were obtained as the only reaction products by using AuCl3 at −50 °C in DCM. Interestingly, a change of the catalyst to [Au(JohnPhos)(NTf2)] under similar reaction conditions afforded the isomeric tetrahydrocarbazoles 116 as the only diastereoisomer. As expected, the formation of multicomponent cycloadducts 117 was favored by using an excess of the allene (2.5 equiv). For this transformation, [Au(JohnPhos)(NTf2)] provided 117 with complete selectivity. All obtained compounds arise from a common intermediate I (Scheme 48). Various experiments showed that both 115 and 117 arise from compound 116. Thus, the treatment of 116 with AuCl3 or [Au(PPh3)(NTf2)] led to the aromatized product 115 (>95%). In contrast, starting from 116 the use of [Au(JohnPhos)(NTf2)] as a catalyst in the presence of the allene (1.5 equiv) gave rise to 117 (90%), probably by a hydroarylation process. Interestingly, vinylindole 118, independently prepared, could not be converted into 115–117 under optimized reaction conditions, pointing out that the cyclization occurred through the proposed intermediate I.


Scheme 48: Plausible reaction mechanism for the synthesis of tetrahydrocarbazoles 115–117.

Reaction involving Au(I)/Au(III) redox cycles. As mentioned above, transformations involving Au(I)/Au(III) redox catalytic systems have been recently reported in the literature, further increasing the diversity of gold-mediated transformation. The Au(I)/Au(III) processes can be accessed through the use of an exogenous oxidant, such as tert-butylhydroperoxide, PhI(OAc), or Selectfluor [116]. Inter alias, two-component Au-catalyzed heteroarylation reactions, performed in the presence of Au(I)/Au(III) redox catalytic systems, have been reported by several authors. For example, the carboamination, carboalkoxylation and carbolactonization of terminal alkenes with arylboronic acids have been implemented under oxidative gold catalysis by Zhang and co-workers (Scheme 49) [117].


Scheme 49: Carboamination, carboalkoxylation and carbolactonization of terminal alkenes.

The same concept has been extended to the MC heteroarylation of alkenes. Toste reported the fully intermolecular alkene heteroarylation by a gold-catalyzed three-component coupling reaction of alkenes 119, arylboronic acids 120, and several types of oxygen nucleophiles 121, including alcohols, carboxylic acids, and water [118]. The reaction employs a binuclear gold(I) bromide as a catalyst and the Selectfluor reagent as the stoichiometric oxidant. Alcohols, carboxylic acids, and water can be employed as oxygen nucleophiles, thus providing an efficient entry to compounds 122 (β-aryl ethers, esters, and alcohols) from alkenes (Scheme 50).


Scheme 50: Oxyarylation of alkenes with arylboronic acids and Selectfluor as reoxidant.

The reactions were performed with 2 equiv of boronic acid 120 and 2 equiv of Selectfluor in MeCN:ROH (9:1) at 50 °C and in the presence of 5 mol % of dppm(AuBr)2 (dppm = bis(diphenylphosphanyl)methane). Ligand and halide effects play a dramatic role in the development of a mild catalytic system for the addition to alkenes. The catalyst choice is a consequence of the screening, comparing the activity of simple Ph3PAuX complexes and bimetallic gold complexes, accomplished by the same authors in a related two-component process [119]. The use of a bimetallic gold complexes as catalysts might minimize the formation of the unwanted bisphosphinogold(I) species [(Ph3P)2Au]+ observed via NMR when Ph3PAuCl or Ph3PAuBr are mixed with Selectfluor and PhB(OH)2. A careful investigation of the reaction mechanism resulted in the catalytic cycle reported in Scheme 51.


Scheme 51: Proposed reaction mechanism for oxyarylation of alkenes.

The first step of the catalytic cycle involves the oxidation of Au(I) into Au(III), which is the effective catalyst for the oxyauration step giving rise to the alkylgold(III) fluoride intermediate I. Then, the reaction of the boronic acid with intermediate I affords the desired final compounds with the release of fluoroboronate and the restoration of the catalyst by reductive elimination. The authors proposed a synchronized mechanism for this step, which involves the five-centered transition state II.

Moreover, Toste and Russell/Lloyd-Jones independently demonstrated that the oxyarylation of alkenes can be achieved with arylsilanes as organometallic reagents, thus avoiding the use of less benign boronic acids [120,121]. Accordingly, Toste and co-workers established that the dppm(AuBr)2/Selectfluor system can promote the reaction of phenyltrimethylsilane 123 with aliphatic alkenes and water or aliphatic alcohols giving rise to 122 in moderate to good yields. The Russell/Lloyd-Jones research group expanded the scope of these reactions to a series of differently substituted arylsilanes performing the reactions in the presence of commercially available Ph3PAuCl and Selectfluor and obtaining the desired compounds 122 with comparable yields (Scheme 52). The proposed reaction mechanism resembles the one described in Scheme 51, and the fluoride anion is probably responsible for the activation of silane without the need of a stoichiometric base. Under the reported conditions the formation of homocoupling side products of boronic acids can be reduced.


Scheme 52: Oxyarylation of alkenes with arylsilanes and Selectfluor as reoxidant.

More recently, Russell and Lloyd-Jones expanded the scope of these reactions to more challenging substrates such as styrenes and gem-disubstituted olefins, which are unreactive under the Selectfluor-based methodology reported above [122]. This goal has been achieved by introducing the 1-hydroxy-1,2-benziodoxol-3(1H)-one (IBA, 2 equiv) as an oxidant in addition to p-toluenesulfonic acid (2 equiv) as an additive and the usual gold catalysts (Ph3PAuCl) (Scheme 53).


Scheme 53: Oxyarylation of alkenes with arylsilanes and IBA as reoxidant.

The role of the acidic additive is unclear. However, the authors hinted at the in situ formation of a more electrophilic and soluble IBA-Ts oxidant. A solvent screening was carried out, and the scope of the reaction with monosubstituted, gem-disubstituted olefins and styrenes was carefully investigated.


The development of multicomponent processes is a continuously growing research area. In this context, gold(I/III) and silver(I) are able to promote a wide range of different MCRs as both simple salts and original complexes, with a particular emphasis on the reactions involving the σ- or π-activation. These coinage metals demonstrated to be “fraternal twins” with several features in common and many peculiar differences, for example, the capability of gold to participate in a redox cycle. However, the practical and industrial importance of A3-coupling reactions fostered the efforts of many researchers. Other classes of silver and gold catalyzed MCRs are described and studied to a lesser extent and are often the transposition of domino reactions to multicomponent processes. Both metals ideally include all the essential features required for a catalyst devoted to control multifaceted transformations such as MCRs. Several hints could encourage the chemists’ community to mix up MCRs and silver/gold catalysis. For example, the high affinity of silver and gold catalysts for unsaturated carbon systems (e.g., alkenes, alkynes and allenes) allows performing nucleophilic additions to these systems in a chemoselective manner under exceptionally mild conditions and at the same time avoids highly reactive carbocationic intermediates. Furthermore, Au and Ag carbene intermediates, able to undergo well-defined rearrangement and/or cycloaddition reactions, are emerging as a valuable tool for the construction of carbo- and heterocyclic compounds. Au and Ag catalyzed cycloadditions itself are fields in continuous development, especially for those reactions that involve non-activated unsaturated systems. In this particular area the development of new chiral catalysts often allows to perform cycloaddition reactions in a stereocontrolled fashion. Finally, of utmost importance in the chemistry of silver and gold complexes is the possibility to control the reactivity and the properties of the metal by ligand or counterion variations. All these statements are supported by literature data and, in particular, by two topical and outstanding books, which deeply cover the chemistry of these metals [123,124].

We hope that both this review and those cited in the references could stimulate the chemists’ community toward the rationale design of new silver and gold MCRs.


  1. Hashmi, A. S. K. A Critical Comparison: Copper, Silver, and Gold. In Silver in Organic Chemistry; Harmata, M., Ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, 2010; pp 357–379. doi:10.1002/9780470597521.ch12
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Yoo, W.-Y.; Zhao, L.; Li, C.-J. Aldrichimica Acta 2011, 44, 43–51.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  3. Peshkov, V. A.; Pereshivko, O. P.; Van der Eycken, E. V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3790–3807. doi:10.1039/c2cs15356d
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  4. Wei, C.; Li, Z.; Li, C.-J. Synlett 2004, 1472–1483. doi:10.1055/s-2004-829531
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Wei, C.; Li, Z.; Li, C.-J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4473–4475. doi:10.1021/ol035781y
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  6. Reddy, K. M.; Babu, N. S.; Suryanarayana, I.; Prasad, P. S. S.; Lingaiah, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 7563–7566. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.08.094
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Huang, B.; Yao, X.; Li, C.-J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 1528–1532. doi:10.1002/adsc.200606118
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Zhang, Y.; Santos, A. M.; Herdtweck, E.; Mink, J.; Kühn, F. E. New J. Chem. 2005, 29, 366–370. doi:10.1039/b414060e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Maggi, R.; Bello, A.; Oro, C.; Sartori, G.; Soldi, L. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 1435–1439. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2007.11.043
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Yong, G.-P.; Tian, D.; Tong, H.-W.; Liu, S.-M. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2010, 323, 40–44. doi:10.1016/j.molcata.2010.03.007
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Yan, W.; Wang, R.; Xu, Z.; Xu, J.; Lin, L.; Shen, Z.; Zhou, Y. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2006, 255, 81–85. doi:10.1016/j.molcata.2006.03.055
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Li, P.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 6650–6654. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.09.026
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. He, Y.; Lv, M.-f.; Cai, C. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 12428–12433. doi:10.1039/c2dt31609a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Song, Y.; Fang, L.; Zou, G. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 2046–2052. doi:10.1039/c0dt01074j
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  15. Chen, M.-T.; Landers, B.; Navarro, O. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 2206–2208. doi:10.1039/c2ob06900h
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  16. Cheng, C.-H.; Chen, D.-F.; Song, H.-B.; Tang, L.-F. J. Organomet. Chem. 2013, 726, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2012.12.008
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  17. Zeng, J.; Bai, Y.; Cai, S.; Ma, J.; Liu, X.-W. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 12855–12857. doi:10.1039/c1cc14716a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Zhao, Y.; Zhou, X.; Okamura, T.-a.; Chen, M.; Lu, Y.; Sun, W.-Y.; Yu, J.-Q. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 5889–5896. doi:10.1039/c2dt30134b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Wei, C.; Li, C.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9584–9585. doi:10.1021/ja0359299
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Lo, V. K.-Y.; Liu, Y.; Wong, M.-K.; Che, C.-M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1529–1532. doi:10.1021/ol0528641
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Lo, V. K.-Y.; Kung, K. K.-Y.; Wong, M.-K.; Che, C.-M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2009, 694, 583–591. doi:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2008.12.008
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Kantam, M. L.; Prakash, B. V.; Reddy, C. R. V.; Sreedhar, B. Synlett 2005, 2329–2332. doi:10.1055/s-2005-872677
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Kidwai, M.; Bansal, V.; Kumar, A.; Mozumdar, S. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 742–745. doi:10.1039/b702287e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Elie, B. T.; Levine, C.; Ubarretxena-Belandia, I.; Varela-Ramírez, A.; Aguilera, R. J.; Ovalle, R.; Contel, M. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 3421–3430. doi:10.1002/ejic.200900279
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Zhang, X.; Corma, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4358–4361. doi:10.1002/anie.200800098
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Chng, L. L.; Yang, J.; Wei, Y.; Ying, J. Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 2887–2896. doi:10.1002/adsc.200900518
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Datta, K. R. R.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Ariga, K.; Vinu, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5961–5965. doi:10.1002/anie.201001699
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Layek, K.; Chakravarti, R.; Kantam, M. L.; Maheswaran, H.; Vinu, A. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2878–2887. doi:10.1039/c1gc15518k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Zhu, F.-X.; Wang, W.; Li, H.-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 11632–11640. doi:10.1021/ja203450g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Karimi, B.; Gholinejad, M.; Khorasani, M. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 8961–8963. doi:10.1039/c2cc33320a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Abahmane, L.; Köhler, J. M.; Groß, G. A. Chem.–Eur. J. 2011, 17, 3005–3010. doi:10.1002/chem.201002043
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. González-Béjar, M.; Peters, K.; Hallett-Tapley, G. L.; Grenier, M.; Scaiano, J. C. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 1732–1734. doi:10.1039/c3cc38287g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Villaverde, G.; Corma, A.; Iglesias, M.; Sánchez, F. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 399–406. doi:10.1021/cs200601w
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Oña-Burgos, P.; Fernández, I.; Roces, L.; Torre-Fernández, L.; García-Granda, S.; López-Ortiz, F. Organometallics 2009, 28, 1739–1747. doi:10.1021/om801137y
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Wetzel, C.; Kunz, P. C.; Thiel, I.; Spingler, B. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 7863–7870. doi:10.1021/ic2011259
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Graf, T. A.; Anderson, T. K.; Bowden, N. B. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 1033–1038. doi:10.1002/adsc.201000859
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Cheng, M.; Zhang, Q.; Hu, X.-Y.; Li, B.-G.; Ji, J.-X.; Chan, A. S. C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 1274–1278. doi:10.1002/adsc.201000914
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Kung, K. K.-Y.; Li, G.-L.; Zou, L.; Chong, H.-C.; Leung, Y.-C.; Wong, K.-H.; Lo, V. K.-Y.; Che, C.-M.; Wong, M.-K. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 925–930. doi:10.1039/c1ob06429k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Srinivas, V.; Koketsu, M. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 8025–8033. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2013.06.098
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Li, J.; Liu, L.; Ding, D.; Sun, J.; Ji, Y.; Dong, J. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 2884–2887. doi:10.1021/ol401239j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Suzuki, Y.; Naoe, S.; Oishi, S.; Fujii, N.; Ohno, H. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 326–329. doi:10.1021/ol203072u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Hou, Z.; Oishi, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Kure, T.; Nakanishi, I.; Hirasawa, A.; Tsujimoto, G.; Ohno, H.; Fujii, N. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 3288–3296. doi:10.1039/c3ob40223a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  43. Campbell, M. J.; Toste, F. D. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 1369–1378. doi:10.1039/c1sc00160d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  44. Wachenfeldt, H. v.; Röse, P.; Paulsen, F.; Loganathan, N.; Strand, D. Chem.–Eur. J. 2013, 19, 7982–7988. doi:10.1002/chem.201300019
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  45. Li, C.; Mo, F.; Li, W.; Wang, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 6053–6056. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.08.049
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Yamamoto, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7817–7831. doi:10.1021/jo070579k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  47. Weibel, J.-M.; Blanc, A.; Pale, P. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3149–3173. doi:10.1021/cr078365q
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Álvarez-Corral, M.; Muñoz-Dorado, M.; Rodríguez-García, I. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3174–3198. doi:10.1021/cr078361l
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  49. Belmont, P. Silver-Catalyzed Cycloisomerization Reactions. In Silver in Organic Chemistry; Harmata, M., Ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, 2010; pp 143–165. doi:10.1002/9780470597521.ch5
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  50. Choudhury, L. H.; Parvin, T. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 8213–8228. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2011.07.020
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  51. Arcadi, A.; Abbiati, G.; Rossi, E. J. Organomet. Chem. 2011, 696, 87–98. doi:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2010.08.011
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  52. Dell’Acqua, M.; Abbiati, G.; Arcadi, A.; Rossi, E. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 7836–7848. doi:10.1039/c1ob06271a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  53. Yu, X.; Wu, J. J. Comb. Chem. 2010, 12, 238–244. doi:10.1021/cc9001263
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  54. Lou, H.; Ye, S.; Zhang, J.; Wu, J. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 2060–2065. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2011.01.048
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  55. Sun, W.; Ding, Q.; Sun, X.; Fan, R.; Wu, J. J. Comb. Chem. 2007, 9, 690–694. doi:10.1021/cc070030z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  56. Ye, S.; Wu, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 6273–6275. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.09.005
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  57. Ding, Q.; Wu, J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4959–4962. doi:10.1021/ol7020669
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  58. Markina, N. A.; Mancuso, R.; Neuenswander, B.; Lushington, G. H.; Larock, R. C. ACS Comb. Sci. 2011, 13, 265–271. doi:10.1021/co1000794
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  59. Verma, A. K.; Reddy Kotla, S. K.; Choudary, D.; Patel, M.; Tiwari, R. K. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 4386–4401. doi:10.1021/jo400400c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  60. Guo, Z.; Cai, M.; Jang, J.; Yang, L.; Hu, W. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 652–655. doi:10.1021/ol902409u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  61. Dell'Acqua, M.; Abbiati, G.; Rossi, E. Synlett 2010, 2672–2676. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1258571
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  62. Lin, L.; Wu, Q.; Huang, S.; Yang, G. Chin. J. Chem. 2012, 30, 1075–1082. doi:10.1002/cjoc.201100560
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  63. Ohta, Y.; Kubota, Y.; Watabe, T.; Chiba, H.; Oishi, S.; Fujii, N.; Ohno, H. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 6299–6302. doi:10.1021/jo901090u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  64. Ohta, Y.; Oishi, S.; Fujii, N.; Ohno, H. Chem. Commun. 2008, 835–837. doi:10.1039/b718201e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  65. Gao, K.; Wu, J. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 8611–8613. doi:10.1021/jo7016839
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  66. Yu, X.; Pan, X.; Wu, J. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 1145–1149. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2010.12.005
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  67. Chen, Z.; Yu, X.; Wu, J. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 6356–6358. doi:10.1039/c0cc01207f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  68. Chen, Z.; Wu, J. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4856–4859. doi:10.1021/ol101988q
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  69. Li, S.; Wu, J. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 712–715. doi:10.1021/ol102939r
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  70. Wan, X.; Xing, D.; Fang, Z.; Li, B.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, K.; Yang, L.; Shi, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12046–12047. doi:10.1021/ja061176p
    And references cited therein.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  71. Yu, X.; Yang, Q.; Lou, H.; Peng, Y.; Wu, J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 7033–7037. doi:10.1039/c1ob05917c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  72. Chen, Z.; Ding, Q.; Yu, X.; Wu, J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 1692–1698. doi:10.1002/adsc.200900131
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  73. Chen, Z.; Yang, X.; Wu, J. Chem. Commun. 2009, 3469–3471. doi:10.1039/b904498a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  74. Chen, Z.; Su, M.; Yu, X.; Wu, J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 4641–4646. doi:10.1039/b914265g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  75. Ye, S.; Yang, X.; Wu, J. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 5238–5240. doi:10.1039/c0cc00905a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  76. Wang, H.; Ye, S.; Jin, H.; Liu, J.; Wu, J. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 5871–5877. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2011.06.056
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  77. Li, S.; Luo, Y.; Wu, J. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4312–4315. doi:10.1021/ol201653j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  78. Yu, X.; Qui, G.; Liu, J.; Wu, J. Synthesis 2011, 2268–2274. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1260063
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  79. Lu, P.; Wang, Y. Synlett 2010, 165–173. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1218558
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  80. Yoo, E. J.; Ahlquist, M.; Bae, I.; Sharpless, K. B.; Fokin, V. V.; Chang, S. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 5520–5528. doi:10.1021/jo800733p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  81. Youg, I. S.; Kerr, M. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3023–3026. doi:10.1002/anie.200351573
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  82. Banfi, L.; Basso, A.; Riva, R. Top. Heterocycl. Chem. 2010, 23, 1–39.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  83. Zhu, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 1133–1144. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200390167
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  84. Meyer, R.; Schöllkopf, U.; Böhme, P. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1977, 1183–1193. doi:10.1002/jlac.197719770715
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  85. Van Leusen, A. M.; Wildeman, J.; Oldenziel, O. H. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 1153–1159. doi:10.1021/jo00427a012
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  86. Grigg, R.; Lansdell, M. I.; Thornton-Pett, M. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 2025–2044. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(98)01216-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  87. Soloshonok, V. A.; Kacharov, A. D.; Avilov, D. V.; Ishikawa, K.; Nagashima, N.; Hayashi, T. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3470–3479. doi:10.1021/jo9623402
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  88. van der Heijden, G.; Ruijter, E.; Orru, R. V. A. Synlett 2013, 24, 666–685. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1318222
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  89. Bon, R. S.; Hong, C.; Bouma, M. J.; Schmitz, R. F.; de Kanter, F. J. J.; Lutz, M.; Spek, A. L.; Orru, R. V. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3759–3762. doi:10.1021/ol035521g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  90. Bon, R. S.; van Vliet, B.; Sprenkels, N. E.; Schmitz, R. F.; de Kanter, F. J. J.; Stevens, C. V.; Swart, M.; Bickelhaupt, F. M.; Groen, M. B.; Orru, R. V. A. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 3542–3553. doi:10.1021/jo050132g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  91. Elders, N.; Schmitz, R. F.; de Kanter, F. J. J.; Ruijter, E.; Groen, M. B.; Orru, R. V. A. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6135–6142. doi:10.1021/jo070840x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  92. Elders, N.; Ruijter, E.; de Kanter, F. J. J.; Groen, M. B.; Orru, R. V. A. Chem.–Eur. J. 2008, 14, 4961–4973. doi:10.1002/chem.200800271
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  93. Yanagisawa, A.; Arai, T. Chem. Commun. 2008, 1165–1172. doi:10.1039/b717104h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  94. Carswell, E. L.; Snapper, M. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7230–7233. doi:10.1002/anie.200603496
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  95. Mandai, H.; Mandai, K.; Snapper, M. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 17961–17969. doi:10.1021/ja807243t
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  96. Garner, P.; Kaniskan, H. Ü.; Hu, J.; Youngs, W. J.; Panzner, M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3647–3650. doi:10.1021/ol061113b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  97. Martín-Rodríguez, M.; Nájera, C.; Sansano, J. M.; Costa, P. R. R.; Crizanto de Lima, E. Synlett 2010, 962–966. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1219534
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  98. Nájera, C.; de Gracia Retamosa, M.; Sansano, J. M. Org. Lett. 2007, 20, 4025–4028. doi:10.1021/ol701577k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  99. Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, C.; Jia, X. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 913–917. doi:10.1002/adsc.201000795
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  100. Pouwer, R. H.; Williams, C. M. Silver Alkyls, Alkenyls, Aryls, and Alkynyls in Organic Synthesis. In Silver in Organic Chemistry; Harmata, M., Ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, 2010; pp 1–41. doi:10.1002/9780470597521.ch1
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  101. Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.-Z.; Ren, X.; Zhang, L.-L.; Lu, X.-B. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2402–2405. doi:10.1021/ol200638z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  102. Boogaerts, I. I. F.; Nolan, S. P. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 3021–3024. doi:10.1039/c0cc03890c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  103. Mizuno, H.; Takaya, J.; Iwasawa, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1251–1253. doi:10.1021/ja109097z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  104. Foley, P.; Eghbali, N.; Anastas, P. T. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 888–892. doi:10.1039/b913685a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  105. Cala, L.; Mendoza, A.; Fañanás, F. J.; Rodríguez, F. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 2715–2717. doi:10.1039/c3cc00118k
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  106. Wu, H.; He, Y.-P.; Gong, L.-Z. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 460–463. doi:10.1021/ol303188u
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  107. Wang, X.; Han, Z.; Wang, Z.; Ding, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 936–940. doi:10.1002/anie.201106488
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  108. Čorić, I.; List, B. Nature 2012, 483, 315–319. doi:10.1038/nature10932
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  109. Sun, Z.; Winschel, G. A.; Borovika, A.; Nagorny, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 8074–8077. doi:10.1021/ja302704m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  110. Meng, J.; Zhao, Y.-L.; Ren, C.-Q.; Li, Y.; Zhu, L.; Liu, Q. Chem.–Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1830–1834. doi:10.1002/chem.200802304
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  111. Schultz, D. M.; Babij, N. R.; Wolfe, J. P. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 3451–3455. doi:10.1002/adsc.201200825
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  112. Wang, S.; Chen, H.; Zhao, H.; Cao, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, Q. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 7300–7304. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201301203
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  113. Pirovano, V.; Decataldo, L.; Rossi, E.; Vicente, R. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 3594–3596. doi:10.1039/c3cc41514g
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  114. López, F.; Mascareñas, J. L. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 1075–1094. doi:10.3762/bjoc.7.124
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  115. Garayalde, D.; Nevado, C. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 1462–1479. doi:10.1021/cs300043w
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  116. Hopkinson, M. N.; Gee, A. D.; Gouverneur, V. Chem.–Eur. J. 2011, 17, 8248–8262. doi:10.1002/chem.201100736
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  117. Zhang, G.; Cui, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1474–1475. doi:10.1021/ja909555d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  118. Melhado, A. D.; Brenzovich, W. E., Jr.; Lackner, A. D.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8885–8887. doi:10.1021/ja1034123
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  119. Brenzovich, W. E., Jr.; Benitez, D.; Lackner, A. D.; Shunatona, H. P.; Tkatchouk, E.; Goddard, W. A., III; Toste, F. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5519–5522. doi:10.1002/anie.201002739
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  120. Brenzovich, W. E., Jr.; Brazeau, J.-F.; Toste, F. D. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4728–4731. doi:10.1021/ol102194c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  121. Ball, L. T.; Green, M.; Lloyd-Jones, G. C.; Russell, C. A. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4724–4727. doi:10.1021/ol1019162
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  122. Ball, L. T.; Lloyd-Jones, G. C.; Russell, C. A. Chem.–Eur. J. 2012, 18, 2931–2937. doi:10.1002/chem.201103061
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  123. Harmata, M., Ed. Silver in Organic Chemistry; Wiley: Hoboken, 2010.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  124. Hashmi, A. S. K.; Toste, F. D., Eds. Modern Gold Catalyzed Synthesis; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co: Weinheim, 2012.
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2014 Abbiati and Rossi; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (

Back to Article List