Copper-catalyzed aminooxygenation of styrenes with N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide and N-hydroxyphthalimide derivatives

  1. Yan Li,
  2. Xue Zhou,
  3. Guangfan Zheng and
  4. Qian Zhang

Department of Chemistry, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China

  1. Corresponding author email

This article is part of the Thematic Series "Copper catalysis in organic synthesis".

Guest Editor: S. R. Chemler
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2721–2726. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.11.293
Received 16 Sep 2015, Accepted 10 Dec 2015, Published 24 Dec 2015

  • Letter

Abstract

A copper-catalyzed aminooxygenation reaction of styrenes with N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide and N-hydroxyphthalimide derivatives has been developed. The aminooxygenation product could be converted into the corresponding alcohol or free amine through the cleavage of the N–O or C–N bond of the N-hydroxyphthalimide moiety.

Keywords: aminooxygenation of styrenes; copper catalysts; N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide; N-hydroxyphthalimide derivatives

Findings

Direct aminooxygenation of alkenes provides a straightforward and powerful approach to construct the 1,2-aminoalcohol skeleton [1], which is ubiquitous in bioactive compounds (such as the drugs bestatin (1) and tamiflu (2), the natural products Al-77-B (3) and hapolosin (4); Figure 1) [2] and has also been widely used as chiral ligands and auxiliaries in asymmetric synthesis [3]. Therefore, the development of a new aminooxygenation reaction is still highly attractive [4]. Most of the existing aminooxygenation reactions involve an intramolecular cyclization step [5-33] to provide various valuable cyclic compounds. Comparatively, methods for an intermolecular three-component aminooxygenation reaction are considerably less established. In 2006, Stahl and co-workers reported a Pd-catalyzed aminooxygenation reaction of alkenes with phthalimide and (diacetoxyiodo)benzene through cis-aminopalladation and SN2 C–O bond formation [34]. In 2013, Zhu and co-workers described an n-Bu4NI-catalyzed aminooxygenation of inactive alkenes with benzotriazole and water which underwent a nitrogen-centred radical addition and a nucleophilic oxygen attack [35]. Very recently, Studer and co-workers presented an aminooxygenation of alkenes with N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide (NFSI) and sodium 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-olate (TEMPONa) via nitrogen-centred radical addition to the alkene followed by trapping of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-N-oxyl (TEMPO) [36].

[1860-5397-11-293-1]

Figure 1: Bioactive compounds containing 1,2-aminoalcohol motif.

NFSI is a very interesting reagent. Besides classic electrophilic fluorination reagent [37], it has been used not only as fluoride-atom transfer reagent [38-40] but also as nucleophilic/radical amination reagent [41]. We are highly interested in the multiple reaction modes of NFSI [37-41], especially as a nitrogen-centred radical. In this context, we have realized copper-catalyzed benzylic sp3 C–H amination [42], aminative multiple functionalization of alkynes [43], diamination, aminocyanation [44] and aminofluorination of alkenes [45], as well as amination of allenes [46]. Encouraged by these results, we try to develop copper-catalyzed aminooxygenation of alkenes by using NFSI. Herein, we report a simple and efficient copper-catalyzed three-component aminooxygenation reaction of styrenes with NFSI and N-hydroxyphthalimide (NHPI) derivatives (Scheme 1).

[1860-5397-11-293-i1]

Scheme 1: Copper-catalyzed radical aminooxygenation reaction of styrenes.

Initially, we conducted the three-component amnooxygenation of styrene 1a with NFSI and NHPI (2a). After the reaction of 1a (0.3 mmol), NFSI (0.3 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and 2a (0.45 mmol, 1.5 equiv) was performed in the presence of Cu(OTf)2 (10 mol %) in dichloromethane (DCM, 2 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere at 70 °C for 10.0 h, the desired aminooxygenation product 3a was obtained in 39% yield (Table 1, entry 1). A variety of copper salts such as CuCl, CuBr, CuI, [(CH3CN)4Cu]PF6, CuCN, Cu(acac)2, Cu(OAc)2, CuBr2 and CuCl2 were examined (Table 1, entries 2–10). We found that CuCl2 was the most effective catalyst, affording 3a in 55% yield (Table 1, entry 10). No reaction was observed in the absence of copper salts (Table 1, entry 11). Next, the reaction solvents were scanned. 1,2-Dichloroethane (DCE) and CH3CN were not efficient solvents, providing 3a in 9% and 20% yields, respectively (Table 1, entries 12 and 13). Using CHCl3 as the solvent, only a trace amount of 3a was observed (Table 1, entry 14). No reaction occurred in the solvents DMF, DMSO and THF (Table 1, entries 15–17). A relatively lower temperature (45 °C) only afforded a trace amount of 3a (Table 1, entry 18). Increasing the temperature to 90 °C or 110 °C, 3a was obtained in 45% and 40% yields, respectively (Table 1, entries 19 and 20). The ratio of substrates distinctly influenced the reaction (Table 1, entries 21–23). Changing the ratio from 1:1:1.5 (1a:NFSI:2a) to 1:2:2 or 1:2:3 (2a:NFSI:1a) led to much better yields (Table 1, entries 21 and 22). To our delight, when the ratio was 1:4:3 (2a:NFSI:1a), 3a was obtained in 76% yield (Table 1, entry 23).

Table 1: The optimization of reaction conditionsa.

[Graphic 1]
Entrya Catalyst Solvent Temp (°C) Yieldb (%)
1 Cu(OTf)2 DCM 70 39
2 CuCl DCM 70 48
3 CuBr DCM 70 43
4 CuI DCM 70 30
5 [(CH3CN)4Cu]PF6 DCM 70 50
6 CuCN DCM 70 16
7 Cu(acac)2 DCM 70 48
8 Cu(OAc)2 DCM 70 51
9 CuBr2 DCM 70 54
10 CuCl2 DCM 70 55
11 none DCM 70 NRc
12 CuCl2 DCE 70 9
13 CuCl2 CH3CN 70 20
14 CuCl2 CHCl3 70 trace
15 CuCl2 DMF 70 NRc
16 CuCl2 DMSO 70 NRc
17 CuCl2 THF 70 NRc
18 CuCl2 DCM 45 trace
19 CuCl2 DCM 90 45
20 CuCl2 DCM 110 40
21d CuCl2 DCM 70 70
22e CuCl2 DCM 70 73
23f CuCl2 DCM 70 76

aReaction conditions: 1a (0.3 mmol), NFSI (0.3 mmol, 1.0 equiv), 2a (0.45 mmol, 1.5 equiv), catalyst (10 mol %), solvent (2.0 mL), N2, 10.0 h. bIsolated yields. cNR: no reaction. d1a:NFSI:2a = 2.0:2.0:1.0 e1a:NFSI:2a = 3.0:2.0:1.0. f1a:NFSI:2a = 3.0:4.0:1.0.

With the optimized reaction conditions in hand (Table 1, entry 23), the scope of this copper-catalyzed aminooxygenation reaction was examined (Figure 2). Styrenes with electron-withdrawing (1a–f) or electron-donating (1h and 1i) groups were viable, providing the corresponding 1,2-aminoalcohol derivatives in good yields. It is worth noting that functionalities such as F, Cl, Br, CN, and NO2 groups, which could easily undergo further transformations, were intact after the reaction (3a–e). The structure of 3e was confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis [47]. The substituent at the ortho (3j and 3k) or meta (3l) position of the aromatic ring did not hinder the reaction (41–55% yields). Similarly, for disubstituted (1m) and trisubstituted (1n) substrates, the aminooxygenation underwent smoothly, providing the corresponding products 3m (51%) and 3n (53%). The trans-β-methylstyrene (1o) afforded the desired product 3o in a low yield (15%). In addition, NHPI derivatives 2b and 2c were suitable nitrogen sources and the desired 3p and 3q were obtained in 56% and 64%, respectively. For 4-methoxystyrene (1r), no aminooxygenation reaction occurred.

[1860-5397-11-293-2]

Figure 2: The copper-catalyzed three-component aminooxygenation of styrenes with NFSI and NHPI derivatives. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.9 mmol, 3.0 equiv), NFSI (1.2 mmol, 4.0 equiv), 2 (0.3 mmol, 1.0 equiv), CuCl2 (10 mol %), DCM (2.0 mL), N2, 70 °C, 10.0 h. Isolated yields.

Based on these experimental results and our previous investigations [42-46,48], a plausible mechanism for the copper-catalyzed three-component aminooxygenation of styrenes with NFSI an NHPI is shown in Scheme 2. Initially, the oxidation of Cu(I) with NFSI provided F–Cu(III)–N complex I, which could transform into a copper(II)-stabilized benzenesulfonimide radical II through a redox isomerization equilibrium. Next, the intermolecular radical addition of II to styrene 1g took place, producing benzylic radical III and Cu(II)–F species IV. The combination of the intermediates III and IV gave the Cu(III) species V having a C–Cu bond, which reacted with 2a to generate Cu(III)–O species VI, along with the loss of HF. Finally, the reductive elimination of VI afforded aminooxygenation product 3g.

[1860-5397-11-293-i2]

Scheme 2: The plausible mechanism.

Finally, we tried to investigate the synthetic value of our new aminooxygenation method. Then, the selective reduction of 3g was conducted (Scheme 3). The cleavage of the N–O bond in 3g readily occurred with Mo(CO)6/Et3N at 80 °C to give alcohol 4 [36] in 67% yield. Treatment of 3g with NH2NH2·H2O under mild conditions (25 °C) in CHCl3/MeOH gave free amine 5 in 70% yield.

[1860-5397-11-293-i3]

Scheme 3: Selective reduction of the aminooxygenation product.

In summary, we have developed a novel copper-catalyzed three-component aminooxygenation reaction of styrenes with NFSI and NHPI derivatives. Furthermore, the aminooxygenation product could be easily converted into the corresponding alcohol or free amine through the cleavage of the N–O or C–N bond of the NHPI moiety. Further studies are underway in our lab.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Experimental part.
Format: PDF Size: 2.3 MB Download

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support for this work from the National NSF of China (21172033, 21372041 and 21302017).

References

  1. Bergmeier, S. C. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 2561–2576. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(00)00149-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Shimojima, Y.; Hayashi, H. J. Med. Chem. 1983, 26, 1370–1374. doi:10.1021/jm00364a007
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Ager, D. J.; Prakash, I.; Schaad, D. R. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 835–876. doi:10.1021/cr9500038
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Donohoe, T. J.; Callens, C. K. A.; Flores, A.; Lacy, A. R.; Rathi, A. H. Chem. – Eur. J. 2011, 17, 58–76. doi:10.1002/chem.201002323
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Noack, M.; Göttlich, R. Chem. Commun. 2002, 536–537. doi:10.1039/b111656h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Szolcsányi, P.; Gracza, T. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3948–3950. doi:10.1039/b506731f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Cochran, B. M.; Michael, F. E. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5039–5042. doi:10.1021/ol8022165
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Muñiz, K.; Iglesias, A.; Fang, Y. Chem. Commun. 2009, 5591–5593. doi:10.1039/B912139K
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Borsini, E.; Broggini, G.; Fasana, A.; Galli, S.; Khansaa, M.; Piarulli, U.; Rigamonti, M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 985–994. doi:10.1002/adsc.201000889
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Broggini, G.; Barbera, V.; Beccalli, E. M.; Chiacchio, U.; Fasana, A.; Galli, S.; Gazzola, S. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 1640–1648. doi:10.1002/adsc.201300104
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Liu, G.-S.; Zhang, Y.-Q.; Yuan, Y.-A.; Xu, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 3343–3346. doi:10.1021/ja311923z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Zhang, Y.-Q.; Yuan, Y.-A.; Liu, G.-S.; Xu, H. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 3910–3913. doi:10.1021/ol401666e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Alexanian, E. J.; Lee, C.; Sorensen, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7690–7691. doi:10.1021/ja051406k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Sherman, E. S.; Fuller, P. H.; Kasi, D.; Chemler, S. R. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3896–3905. doi:10.1021/jo070321u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Chemler, S. R. J. Organomet. Chem. 2011, 696, 150–158. doi:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2010.08.041
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Fuller, P. H.; Kim, J.-W.; Chemler, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 17638–17639. doi:10.1021/ja806585m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Chemler, S. R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 3009–3019. doi:10.1039/b907743j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Sherman, E. S.; Chemler, S. R. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 467–471. doi:10.1002/adsc.200800705
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Paderes, M. C.; Chemler, S. R. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1915–1918. doi:10.1021/ol9003492
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Karyakarte, S. D.; Smith, T. P.; Chemler, S. R. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 7755–7760. doi:10.1021/jo3013226
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Paderes, M. C.; Chemler, S. R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 3679–3684. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201100444
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. de Haro, T.; Nevado, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 123, 936–940. doi:10.1002/ange.201005763
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Mancheno, D. E.; Thornton, A. R.; Stoll, A. H.; Kong, A.; Blakey, S. B. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4110–4113. doi:10.1021/ol101702w
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Liang, D.; Liu, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5678–5681. doi:10.1002/anie.201100362
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Sanjaya, S.; Chiba, S. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 5342–5345. doi:10.1021/ol302525m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Desai, L. V.; Sanford, M. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5737–5740. doi:10.1002/anie.200701454
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Schmidt, V. A.; Alexanian, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 11402–11405. doi:10.1021/ja204255e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Han, B.; Yang, X.-L.; Fang, R.; Yu, W.; Wang, C.; Duan, X.-Y.; Liu, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8816–8820. doi:10.1002/anie.201203799
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Sequeira, F. C.; Chemler, S. R. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 4482–4485. doi:10.1021/ol301984b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Michaelis, D. J.; Shaffer, C. J.; Yoon, T. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1866–1867. doi:10.1021/ja067894t
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Michaelis, D. J.; Ischay, M. A.; Yoon, T. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6610–6615. doi:10.1021/ja800495r
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Williamson, K. S.; Yoon, T. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 4570–4571. doi:10.1021/ja1013536
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Benkovics, T.; Guzei, I. A.; Yoon, T. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9153–9157. doi:10.1002/anie.201004635
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Liu, G.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7179–7181. doi:10.1021/ja061706h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Xue, Q.; Xie, J.; Xu, P.; Hu, K.; Cheng, Y.; Zhu, C. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 1365–1368. doi:10.1021/cs400250m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Li, Y.; Hartmann, M.; Daniliuc, C. G.; Studer, A. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 5706–5709. doi:10.1039/C5CC00591D
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  37. Ma, J.-A.; Cahard, D. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, PR1–PR43. doi:10.1021/cr800221v
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  38. Rueda-Becerril, M.; Sazepin, C. C.; Leung, J. C. T.; Okbinoglu, T.; Kennepohl, P.; Paquin, J.-F.; Sammis, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 4026–4029. doi:10.1021/ja211679v
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  39. Halperin, S. D.; Fan, H.; Chang, S.; Martin, R. E.; Britton, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 4690–4693. doi:10.1002/anie.201400420
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  40. Sibi, M. P.; Landais, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3570–3572. doi:10.1002/anie.201209583
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  41. Li, Y.; Zhang, Q. Synthesis 2015, 47, 159–174. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1379396
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  42. Ni, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Xiong, T.; Zheng, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1244–1247. doi:10.1002/anie.201107427
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  43. Zheng, G.; Li, Y.; Han, J.; Xiong, T.; Zhang, Q. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, No. 7011. doi:10.1038/ncomms8011
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  44. Zhang, H.; Pu, W.; Xiong, T.; Li, Y.; Zhou, X.; Sun, K.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2529–2533. doi:10.1002/anie.201209142
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  45. Zhang, H.; Song, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 11079–11083. doi:10.1002/anie.201406797
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  46. Zhang, G.; Xiong, T.; Wang, Z.; Xu, G.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 12649–12653. doi:10.1002/anie.201506066
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  47. The X-ray crystallographic coordinates for the structure of compound 3e reported in this article have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), under deposition number 1422654.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Sun, K.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q. Sci. China: Chem. 2015, 58, 1354–1358. doi:10.1007/s11426-015-5385-y
    Return to citation in text: [1]

Article is part of the thematic issue

Copper catalysis in organic synthesis

Sherry R. Chemler

Interesting articles

Copper-catalyzed aerobic aliphatic C–H oxygenation with hydroperoxides

Pei Chui Too, Ya Lin Tnay and Shunsuke Chiba

Recent advances in transition-metal-catalyzed intermolecular carbomagnesiation and carbozincation

Kei Murakami and Hideki Yorimitsu

Synthesis of aryl-substituted thieno[3,2-b]thiophene derivatives and their use for N,S-heterotetracene construction

Nadezhda S. Demina, Nikita A. Kazin, Nikolay A. Rasputin, Roman A. Irgashev and Gennady L. Rusinov

News

The Beilstein-Institut is a member of the STM
Logo OA

2.622 is the 2019 Journal Impact Factor.
Logo OA

Call for papers is open for this thematic issue. Submit your original research!
Logo OA

© 2015 Li et al; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

 
Back to Article List

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities

Logo
Logo
Logo
Logo

Keep Informed

RSS Feed

Subscribe to our Latest Articles RSS Feed.

Subscribe

Follow the Beilstein-Institut

LinkedIn

Twitter: @BeilsteinInst