Thiazol-4-one derivatives from the reaction of monosubstituted thioureas with maleimides: structures and factors determining the selectivity and tautomeric equilibrium in solution

  1. Alena S. Pankova1,
  2. Pavel R. Golubev1,
  3. Alexander F. Khlebnikov1,
  4. Alexander Yu. Ivanov2 and
  5. Mikhail A. Kuznetsov1

1Institute of Chemistry, Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetsky pr. 26, Saint Petersburg, 198504, Russia
2Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetsky pr. 26, Saint Petersburg, 198504, Russia

  1. Corresponding author email

Associate Editor: J. Aubé
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 2563–2569. doi:10.3762/bjoc.12.251
Received 10 Aug 2016, Accepted 17 Nov 2016, Published 29 Nov 2016

Abstract

2-(Alkyl(aryl)amino)thiazol-4(5H)-ones can regioselectively be prepared from monoalkyl(aryl)thioureas and maleimides. In solution, the former heterocycles exist in a tautomeric equilibrium with 2-(alkyl(aryl)imino)thiazolidin-4-ones and the substituent on the exocyclic nitrogen atom governs the ratio of these tautomers. Isomers with the alkyl group in the endocyclic position can be obtained from N-methyl(ethyl)thioureas. 2D NMR spectroscopy and DFT calculations rationalize experimental results.

Keywords: maleimides; regioselectivity; tautomerism; thiazolidinones; thioureas

Introduction

The thiazolidine core is one of the privileged scaffolds in a variety of pharmaceuticals with exclusively broad range of biological activities [1-7]. 2-Aminothiazolidin-4-ones can be easily prepared treating thiourea derivatives with various dielectrophiles [8]. In particular, the addition of monoalkyl(aryl)thioureas to N-substituted maleimides provides the corresponding thiazolidinylacetamides. First described by Marrian in 1949 [9] and later developed further by Augustin and co-workers [10,11], a plausible mechanism for this transformation was postulated. It includes a nucleophilic attack of the thiourea sulfur atom on the C=C bond of the maleimide followed by a proton transfer and nucleophilic attack of the thiourea nitrogen atom on one of the two carbonyl groups; the latter step is considered rate determining (Scheme 1). It was reported that the substituent on the maleimide nitrogen atom, particularly a group in the para-position of the phenyl ring in N-arylmaleimides, affects the reactivity of the maleimide toward nucleophilic addition [10]. Strange as it may seem, N-phenylthiourea reacts with N-phenylmaleimide providing thiazolidine with the exocyclic position of the phenyl group, whereas an isomer with the phenyl group on the endocyclic nitrogen atom was obtained from the same thiourea and N-ethylmaleimide (Scheme 1) [9]. This behavior has not been explained and there is lack of more recent information on the regioselectivity of this reaction. On the other hand, the addition of monosubstituted thioureas to maleic anhydride [12-16] or its open-chain derivatives [17,18] leads to thiazolidines with the parent thiourea’s substituent in the exocyclic position.

[1860-5397-12-251-i1]

Scheme 1: The regioselectivities of the reaction between monosubstituted thioureas and maleimides according to [9].

Another unresolved issue is the nature of the dynamic process observed in solutions of 2-aminothiazolidines. This phenomenon was first detected by UV spectroscopy [19] and believed to be caused by a proton transfer between nitrogen atoms (amino–imino tautomerism), however, contradictory information on the equilibrium ratio of tautomers exist [15,18,20-23]. (E/Z)-Isomerization of the exocyclic C=N bond of the single imino form was suggested as the cause for the dynamic effect as well [24,25]. In addition, this process complicates the interpretation of NMR spectra of thiazolidines and is a likely source of misinterpretations. For example, the reported NMR data of 2-arylaminothiazol-4-one derivatives is given as one set of signals, while the actual spectra clearly displayed signals of two distinct forms [17].

In order to remove these ambiguities, and in line with our previous work [26], we set about to thoroughly investigate the regioselectivity of the reaction between monosubstituted thioureas and maleimides and the tautomerism of the products. The results of this investigation are reported herein.

Results and Discussion

First, we repeated some experiments reported by Marrian [9], namely, the reactions of N-phenylthiourea (1a) with N-phenyl- and N-ethylmaleimides 2a,b. The experimental protocol [9] required reflux temperature for reaction with 2a and room temperature for 2b. We obtained thiazolidines 3a,b as single products in both cases according to the 1H NMR spectra of the reaction mixtures (Scheme 2). Performing the latter reaction under reflux conditions provided the same result.

[1860-5397-12-251-i2]

Scheme 2: Reaction of N-phenylthiourea (1a) with maleimides 2a,b (conceivable products are given in parentheses).

The very similar 1H NMR spectra of both compounds had obvious features of dynamic processes in solution: two broad downfield signals in a ratio ≈ 1:1 (δ 11.16 and 11.74 ppm for 3a, 11.11 and 11.69 ppm for 3b, DMSO-d6) and two sets of insufficiently resolved signals of other protons. The presence of two forms follows from the 13C NMR spectra as well. Taking into account the differences in nucleophilicity between the unsubstituted and phenyl-substituted nitrogen atoms of thiourea 1a, the phenyl group in compounds 3a,b is more likely to be found in the exocyclic position. A possible explanation is the presence of two tautomeric forms (the amino form A and the imino form I) (Scheme 2). At the same time, the structure with endocyclic phenyl group was proposed by Marrian [9] and it could not be ruled out. In this case two interconverting E/Z-isomers at the exocyclic C=N bond (given in parentheses on Scheme 2) could be involved.

Therefore we have thoroughly analyzed the spectroscopic data of thiazolidine 3a from 2D NMR experiments (NOESY, 13C,1H and 15N,1H-HSQC and HMBC) and made a full assignment of all signals. A large difference in the chemical shift (0.8 ppm) was found for the positions of the fragment originating from the thiourea’s phenyl ortho-protons of the two forms. However, signals of the corresponding carbon atoms did not differ significantly. The chemical shifts of the thiazolidine carbonyl C4 atom signals of the two forms differ by 12 ppm. The corresponding 15N–1H correlation spectra allowed determining the signal of the exocyclic amide nitrogen atom (δ ≈ 133 ppm); only one of the two thiourea nitrogen atoms could be detected in the product. A direct correlation was found between the signals of the nitrogen atom at δ ≈ 127 ppm and the proton at δ 11.23 ppm. This nitrogen atom also correlates with the phenyl ortho-protons (δ 7.81 ppm) meaning that both, the proton and the phenyl ring, are attached to the same nitrogen atom, which is only possible for the A form among the four structures shown in Scheme 2. These results allow us to exclude the structure with the endocyclic position of parent thiourea’s phenyl group and the E/Z-isomerism from consideration. However, no proof for the I form of 3a was obtained because no correlations for the proton at δ 11.83 ppm were observed, possibly because of the partial or full localization of this proton on the nearest oxygen atom.

The NMR spectroscopic correlations described above were found for compound 3b as well. According to the 15N,1H-HMBC spectrum, the signal of the exocyclic NH proton of the A form (δH 11.00 ppm, δN ≈ 128 ppm) correlates with the nitrogen atom at δ ≈ 235 ppm, which is obviously the C=N atom of this form. No correlations were found for the proton signal at δ 11.68 ppm of 3b-I as mentioned for 3a-I.

However, X-ray analysis indicated this proton in the crystal structure of 3b (Figure 1) [27] and there are two partially occupied positions of the “jumping” hydrogen atom in the structure of 3b (see Supporting Information File 1). This confirms the two tautomeric A and I forms of thiazolidine 3b rather than E/Z-isomers with the endocyclic phenyl group. While in solution the ratio of tautomers is 1:1, in the solid state the A form prevails.

[1860-5397-12-251-1]

Figure 1: OLEX2 representation of the crystal structure of thiazolidine 3b. Thermal ellipsoids are given at the 50% probability level.

The signal of the ortho-protons of the phenyl group at the nitrogen atom of 3a,b-I is located 0.7–0.8 ppm upfield than those next to the NH group of the A form, although the corresponding ortho-carbon signals are very close (Δδ ≈ 1.1–1.2 ppm). The observation was also made for the related thiazolidines 3c–g, see below.

We then varied substrates 1 and 2 to examine the influence of substitution on the reaction regioselectivity and on the ratio of the tautomeric products (Table 1). In all cases thiazolidines 3 were obtained as single products with tautomeric mixtures of the A and I forms in solution. As expected, the electronic character of the substituent at the phenyl ring of maleimide 2 (compare 2a, Scheme 2, and 2c,d, Table 1) as well as the size of an alkyl group (compare 3b, Scheme 2, and 3e, Table 1) did not affect the product structure or the tautomeric ratio.

Table 1: Reaction of monosubstituted thioureas 1af with maleimides 2ae.

[Graphic 1]
Thiourea R1 Maleimide R2 Thiazolidine Isolated yield, % Ratio A:I
1a Ph 2c 4-EtOC6H4 3c 66 1:1
1a Ph 2d 4-O2NC6H4 3d 89 1:1
1a Ph 2e c-Hex 3e 56 1:1
1b 4-MeOC6H4 2a Ph 3f 65 1:1
1c 4-O2NC6H4 2a Ph 3g 73 1:1.8
1d c-Hex 2a Ph 3h 80 4:1
1d c-Hex 2b Et 3i 74 4:1
1e Et 2a Ph 3j 66 4:1
1f Me 2a Ph 3k 50 4:1

A substituent in the thiourea is more likely to exert influence on the reaction regioselectivity and/or position of the tautomeric equilibrium. Nevertheless, the same regioselectivity was observed in the reactions of arylthioureas 1b,c with N-phenylmaleimide (2a) as for phenylthiourea (1a) (Table 1). Thioureas 1b,c appeared to be less active than 1a because a 1.5-fold excess of maleimide 2a was necessary to reach full conversion. Although the A:I ratio for thiazolidine 3f was found to be 1:1 as for all other phenyl-substituted analogues 3a–e, the nitro-substituted thiazolidine 3g features an A:I ratio of ca. 1:1.8. The tautomerization process of thiazolidine 3g in solution led to a very strong broadening of its signals in the 1H NMR spectrum at 23 °C (Figure 2). Decreasing the temperature to −20 °C slowed down the proton transfer and the two sets of signals could be clearly seen and were fully assigned to the two forms of 3g as it had been done earlier for 3a. On the other hand, heating the solution of thiazolidine 3g up to 120 °C led to coalescence. At this temperature even the signals of the ortho-protons of the 4-nitrophenyl ring (Δδ = 0.9 ppm at −20 °C) coalesced into one (Figure 2).

[1860-5397-12-251-2]

Figure 2: Fragments of the 1H NMR spectra of thiazolidine 3g at −20 °C (1), 23 °C (2) and 120 °C (3). Spectrum (1) was recorded at 500 MHz, spectra (2) and (3) at 400 MHz, respectively.

The deviation of the tautomeric ratio for 3g from the ones observed for thiazolidines 3a–f seems to be caused by a weakening of the conjugation in the fragment NH–C=N–C=O realized in A form due to the strong electron-withdrawing effect of the 4-nitrophenyl group at the terminal NH group.

Introducing an alkyl group in thioureas 1d–f had no effect on the regioselectivity of the addition to maleimide 2 forming thiazolidines 3h–k (Table 1). Although alkyl groups generally increase the nucleophilicity of the adjacent nitrogen atom as compared to the unsubstituted one, the methyl-substituted thiazoldine 3k having the methyl group attached to the exocyclic nitrogen was the sole product according to 1H NMR spectroscopy.

In contrast, the tautomeric ratio was notably changed. For the alkyl-substituted thiazolidines 3h–k an A:I ratio of 4:1 was found according to the 1H NMR spectra. The exocyclic NH protons of the A forms gave signals at δ 9.12–9.20 ppm with 3J = 4.4–7.5 Hz, whereas a broad signal for the NH proton of the I form was observed more downfield (δ 9.49–9.68 ppm). Thus, the A form is more favorable for alkyl-substituted thiazolidines, and therefore the conjugation of the NH–C=N–C=O chain is likely more efficient than that of the N=C–NH–C=O fragment.

Aiming to improve the yield of thiazolidine 3k, we performed this reaction under milder conditions. Surprisingly, an inverse regioselectivity was observed when the reaction was carried out at room temperature, and thiazolidine 4k with the methyl group at the endocyclic nitrogen was obtained as a single product (Table 2). According to the 1H NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture, only trace amounts of thiazolidine 3k were formed (<10% of 4k). The thiazolidine 4k exists in a single form, and no signs of any dynamic process were observed by NMR spectroscopy. Its structure was confirmed by the 13C,1H-HMBC spectrum that contained similar correlations between the methyl protons and both C=O and C=N carbon signals. Besides, these two carbon signals for 4k are found more upfield than those for 3k (by 14.4 ppm for C=O and 22.3 ppm for C=N).

Table 2: Reaction of monoalkylthioureas 1d–f with N-phenylmaleimide (2a) at room temperature.

[Graphic 2]
Thiourea Alk Thiazolidine Isolated yield, % Ratio 3:4a
1d c-Hex 3h 91 1:0
1e Et 3j + 4j 68 0.6:1
1f Me 4k 66 <0.1:1

aAccording to the 1H NMR spectra of the reaction mixtures.

Having obtained this unexpected result, we performed reactions of two other alkyl-substituted thioureas 1d,e with N-phenylmaleimide (2a) at room temperature (Table 2). N-Ethylthiourea (1e) gave a mixture of isomers 3j and 4j, and N-cyclohexylthiourea (1d) – only isomer 3h with the alkyl group on the exocyclic nitrogen atom. Steric factors seem to account for this result. Even a small size increase of an alkyl group from methyl to ethyl reduced selectivity, and cyclohexyl group yielded a single isomer.

Thiazolidine 4k with the endocyclic nitrogen substituted with a methyl group can isomerize into isomer 3k when refluxed in ethanol (ratio 4k:3k after 2 h was 1:0.9, after 4 h it changed to 1:2.4). Whereas the formation of the isomer 4k corresponds to the relative nucleophilicity of the nitrogen atoms of thiourea 1f, the isomer 3k seems to be more thermodynamically stable. The choice of the solvent turned out to be crucial for the isomerization: no change was observed after thiazolidine 4k was heated in dioxane, even with addition of AcOH, and almost the same was observed in acetonitrile (ratio 4k:3k ≈ 1:0.09 after 4 h). The reactions of both thioureas 1e and 1f with N-phenylmaleimide (2a) in dioxane either at room temperature or under reflux conditions provided mixtures of isomeric thiazolidines with prevalence of isomers with the alkyl group on the exocyclic nitrogen atom, respectively. Thus, the formation of thiazolidines is very sensitive to solvent properties as we demonstrated earlier [26].

DFT calculations (B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p)) confirm all conclusions given before pertaining to the effectiveness of conjugation and stability of thiazolidinones (Table 3). Isomers with an exocyclic position of the substituent R are the most stable, be it an aryl or an alkyl group. Only for R = Me or Et the isomers with the substituents bound to the endocyclic nitrogen atom are rather stable as we have observed for thiazolidines 4j,k; in other cases its formation is unfavorable. Among pairs of tautomers, the phenyl-substituted ones have the minimum difference in stability, which agrees with the observed equimolar A:I ratio in solutions of the aryl-substituted thiazolidines 3a–f (Scheme 2, Table 1). The less stable I form, when R is an alkyl group, accounts for the tautomeric ratio change in favor of the A form (A:I ratio for thiazolidines 3h–k ≈ 4:1, Table 1). Only for R = 4-O2NC6H4 the I form is more stable than the A form which was indeed observed in case of thiazolidine 3g (A:I ratio ≈ 1:1.8).

Table 3: Relative Gibbs free energies of the optimized conformations of model thiazolidines, ΔG (kcal/mol) [DFT B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p)), 298 K, DMSO (PCM)].

[Graphic 3]
R exo-A exo-I endo
Ph 0 0.18 4.03
4-O2NC6H4 1.26 0 7.04
Me 0 3.33 2.68
Et 0 3.48 2.82
c-Hex 0 5.05 7.17

Conclusion

We have demonstrated that the addition of monosubstituted thioureas to maleimides proceeds regioselectively to form thiazolidinones with an exocyclic position of the parent thiourea’s substituent for both aryl and alkyl groups. The substituent at the maleimide nitrogen atom has no influence on the reaction selectivity. However, the substituent on the parent thiourea determines the ratio of two tautomeric forms of the thiazolidines in solution. If it is an aryl group, the comparable stability of both forms results in an equimolar ratio of tautomers, except for the case of a strong electron-withdrawing group which changes the ratio in favor of the imino tautomer. The amino form prevails for alkyl-substituted thiazolidines.

Reactions of N-methyl- and N-ethylthioureas depend on the solvent and temperature. The best regioselectivity can be achieved in ethanol: at room temperature the less stable thiazolidines with the endocyclic nitrogen substituted by the alkyl group are formed preferentially. The reported data have revealed the delicate balance of electronic and steric factors determining the result of this seemingly simple reaction and can be used for the targeted synthesis of various aminothiazolidinones.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Experimental procedures, characterization data and copies of the 1H, 13C and 2D NMR spectra; X-ray analysis data for thiazolidine 3b.
Format: PDF Size: 2.3 MB Download

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by a grant of the President of Russian Federation (no. MK-5965.2016.3). NMR, HRMS, and XRD analyses were performed at the Saint Petersburg State University Center for Magnetic Resonance, Center for Chemical Analysis and Materials Research, and X-ray Diffraction Center, respectively.

References

  1. Tripathi, A. C.; Gupta, S. J.; Fatima, G. N.; Sonar, P. K.; Verma, A.; Saraf, S. K. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 72, 52–77. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.11.017
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Jain, A. K.; Vaidya, A.; Ravichandran, V.; Kashaw, S. K.; Agrawal, R. K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 3378–3395. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2012.03.069
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Geronikaki, A. A.; Pitta, E. P.; Liaras, K. S. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20, 4460–4480. doi:10.2174/09298673113209990143
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Devinyak, O.; Zimenkovsky, B.; Lesyk, R. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 2763–2784. doi:10.2174/1568026611212240006
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Devi, P. B.; Samala, G.; Sridevi, J. P.; Saxena, S.; Alvala, M.; Salina, E. G.; Sriram, D.; Yogeeswari, P. ChemMedChem 2014, 9, 2538–2547. doi:10.1002/cmdc.201402171
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Asati, V.; Mahapatra, D. K.; Bharti, S. K. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 87, 814–833. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.10.025
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Zhang, Q.; Zhou, H.; Zhai, S.; Yan, B. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2010, 16, 1826–1842. doi:10.2174/138161210791208983
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Metwally, M. A.; Farahat, A. A.; Abdel-Wahab, B. F. J. Sulfur Chem. 2010, 31, 315–349. doi:10.1080/17415993.2010.482155
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Marrian, D. H. J. Chem. Soc. 1949, 1797–1799. doi:10.1039/jr9490001797
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  10. Augustin, M.; Rudorf, W.-D.; Pasche, R. Z. Chem. 1974, 14, 434–435. doi:10.1002/zfch.19740141105
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  11. Augustin, M.; Müller, W. J. Prakt. Chem. 1985, 327, 789–798. doi:10.1002/prac.19853270511
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Balasubramaniyan, V.; Balasubramaniyan, P.; Wani, M. J. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B 1990, 29, 1092–1096.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Zawisza, T.; Wagner, E. Pol. J. Chem. 1985, 59, 149–158.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Junek, H.; Jacobson, N. M.; Wiedner, P.; Nordberg, K.; Rauch-Puntigam, H. Monatsh. Chem. 1978, 109, 395–404. doi:10.1007/BF00906358
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Lesyk, R.; Zimenkovsky, B.; Subtelna, I.; Nektegayev, I.; Kazmirchuk, G. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2003, 60, 457–466.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  16. Al-Holly, M. M.; Augustin, M.; Faust, J.; Köhler, M. Z. Chem. 1979, 19, 95–96. doi:10.1002/zfch.19790190304
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. El-Sakka, S. S.; Soliman, M. H.; Abdullah, R. S. J. Chem. Sci. 2014, 126, 1883–1891. doi:10.1007/s12039-014-0740-7
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  18. El-Aasar, N. K.; Saied, K. F. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2008, 45, 645–652. doi:10.1002/jhet.5570450302
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  19. Arakelian, A.; Dunn, H., Jr.; Grieshammer, L.; Coleman, L. J. Org. Chem. 1960, 25, 465–467. doi:10.1021/jo01073a613
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Toldy, L. G. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 1978, 14, 705–714. doi:10.1007/BF00471632
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Hyengoyan, A. P.; Eliazyan, K. A.; Pivazyan, V. A.; Khazaryan, E. A.; Dovlatyan, V. V. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2005, 41, 1062–1065. doi:10.1007/s10593-005-0280-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Engoyan, A. P.; Peresleni, E. M.; Vlasova, T. F.; Chizhevskaya, I. I.; Sheinker, Yu. N. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 1978, 14, 148–153. doi:10.1007/BF00945327
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Ramsh, S. M.; Smorygo, N. A.; Ginak, A. I. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 1984, 20, 865–869. doi:10.1007/BF00513571
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Obushak, N. D.; Matiichuk, V. S.; Ganushchak, N. I.; Burlak, Yu. É. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 1998, 34, 492–496. doi:10.1007/BF02290893
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Ramsh, S. M.; Smorygo, N. A.; Khrabrova, E. S.; Ginak, A. I. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 1986, 22, 447–451. doi:10.1007/BF00542789
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Pankova, A. S.; Samartsev, M. A.; Shulgin, I. A.; Golubev, P. R.; Avdontceva, M. S.; Kuznetsov, M. A. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 51780–51786. doi:10.1039/C4RA07840C
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  27. Supplementary crystallographic data for this paper have been deposited at Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC 1497518) and can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2016 Pankova et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

 
Back to Article List