Microwave-assisted synthesis of 2-substituted 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1,3-thiazepines from 4-aminobutanol

  1. María C. MolloORCID Logo,
  2. Natalia B. Kilimciler,
  3. Juan A. Bisceglia and
  4. Liliana R. OrelliORCID Logo

Universidad de Buenos Aires. CONICET. Departamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Junín 956, (1113) Buenos Aires, Argentina

  1. Corresponding author email

Associate Editor: I. Baxendale
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2020, 16, 32–38. doi:10.3762/bjoc.16.5
Received 26 Oct 2019, Accepted 11 Dec 2019, Published 06 Jan 2020

A non-peer-reviewed version of this article has been previously published as a preprint doi:10.3762/bxiv.2019.135.v1

Abstract

A general procedure for the synthesis of 2-substituted tetrahydro-1,3-thiazepines by MW-assisted cyclization of 4-thioamidobutanols is presented. The acyclic precursors were prepared in high overall yields by an expeditious three-step diacylation/thionation/deprotection sequence from 4-aminobutanol. Microwave-assisted ring closure of 4-thioamido alcohols promoted by trimethylsilyl polyphosphate (PPSE) in solvent-free conditions allowed for the synthesis of several hitherto unreported seven-membered iminothioethers bearing 2-aryl, alkenyl, aralkyl and alkyl substituents. The cyclodehydration reaction is likely to involve an SN2-type displacement and affords good to excellent yields of the desired heterocycles in very short reaction times.

Keywords: cyclodehydration; medium-size heterocycles; microwaves; PPSE; tetrahydrothiazepines

Introduction

Thiazolines (4,5-dihydrothiazoles) are widely studied heterocycles due to their multiple applications as antibiotics [1], antiproliferative agents [2], anti-inflammatories [3] and antithrombotics [4]. They are also found in many bioactive natural products [5-8], some of which display anti-HIV-1 [9] and antimitotic activities [10], among others. Thiazolines also find use in organic synthesis as building blocks in drug discovery, and as ligands in metal-catalyzed reactions [11-16]. Their six-membered homologues (5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazines) are also compounds of broad interest [17], due to their bioactivities [18,19] and as valuable synthetic intermediates [20-22].

On the other hand, the seven-membered iminothioethers (4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1,3-thiazepines) have remained almost unexplored. This virtual void is probably due to the known difficulty of the annulation of seven-membered heterocyclic rings. In fact, ring closure reactions leading to medium-sized heterocycles are hampered by unfavourable entropic and enthalpic factors, and are usually characterized by harsh reaction conditions, long reaction times, low yields and/or competitive intermolecular reactions [23-28].

In 1963, 2-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1,3-thiazepine was prepared by a double displacement reaction between 2,6-dichlorothiobenzamide and 1,4-butylene dibromide [29]. In 1970, Mente prepared a dehydro analogue, namely 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-4,7-dihydro-1,3-thiazepine, via thermolysis of N-(4-chlorothiobenzoyl)-2-vinylaziridine [30]. No yields were reported for these reactions in either case. The synthesis of 2-phenyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1,3-thiazepine by cyclodehydration of N-(4-hydroxybutyl)thiobenzamide was attempted with different condensing agents: PPA (100 °C, 15 h), Burgess (25 °C, 48 h) and PEG-Burgess (80 °C, 2 h) reagents, and under Mitsunobu conditions. In the first case, the 1H NMR spectrum of the resulting product contained no signals in the aromatic region [31]. The Burgess reagent led to 58% of the desired product, while the modified PEG-Burgess reagent yielded a mixture of the thiazepine (17%) and the isomeric N-thiobenzoylpyrrolidine (40%). The use of Mitsunobu conditions led exclusively to the pyrrolidine derivative (76%) [32]. Therefore, the few literature examples reported until now are either complicated by side reactions or involve long reaction times and/or modest yields.

Polyphosphoric acid (PPA) esters PPE (ethyl polyphosphate) and PPSE (trimethylsilyl polyphosphate) are powerful and versatile dehydrating agents that find many applications in organic synthesis [33-42]. Their preparation is operationally simple and requires readily available and inexpensive starting materials. In addition, they are stable, non-toxic and environmentally safe. These reagents play a dual role, as they enhance the electrophilicity of nitriles, carbonyls and carbinols, and can also react irreversibly with water. Unlike PPA, a Brønsted acid incompatible with some acid-sensitive functionalities, PPE and PPSE are aprotic and mild reagents, with wide functional group tolerance. The use of PPA has some operational disadvantages: it is an extremely viscous liquid that requires high temperatures to allow stirring of the reaction mixture, in which organic compounds do not generally dissolve, while PPA esters are soluble in many organic solvents [43].

Ring closure reactions leading to different heterocyclic cores are relevant among the synthetic applications of PPA esters. The use of MW irradiation as the energy source in these reactions [44-47] is of particular interest due to the many advantages associated with MAOS: very short reaction times, minimization of side products and consequent increment of the yields. To our knowledge, however, PPA esters had not been tested yet for the synthesis of cyclic iminothioethers.

As part of an ongoing program on the applicability of PPE and PPSE to the synthesis of nitrogen-containing heterocycles [48-54], we developed a general method for the preparation of five- and six-membered cyclic iminoethers (2-oxazolines and 5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-oxazines, respectively), by MW-assisted ring closure of amido alcohols promoted by PPA esters [54]. PPE and PPSE were then tested for the synthesis of the more challenging seven-membered heterocycles, namely 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1,3-oxazepines. Instead of the target compounds, the reactions led to the corresponding N-acylpyrrolidines, as disclosed by Hoogenboom et al. [55]. These results were intriguing, since the synthesis of some seven- and even eight-membered 1,3-diheterocycles had already been achieved by our group using the PPA ester/MW system [48,50,52,53].

Considering the lack of efficient methods for 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1,3-thiazepines, we decided to explore their synthesis by microwave-assisted ring closure of N-(4-hydroxybutyl)thioamides promoted by PPA esters. The preparation of these acyclic precursors is not straightforward, as it involves a selective thionation step.

We present herein a novel method for the synthesis of seven-membered cyclic iminothioethers from commercially available 4-aminobutanol. The sequence allows the preparation of 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1,3-thiazepines bearing 2-aryl, aralkyl, alkenyl and alkyl substituents.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of the acyclic precursors

As previously mentioned, some difficulties were anticipated regarding the synthesis of 4-thioamidobutanols. In fact, the direct thionation of the corresponding 4-amido alcohols cannot be used, as the OH is almost as reactive as the amide carbonyl toward Lawesson's reagent, the most commonly used thionating agent [56]. Two syntheses of ω-thioamidobutanols were recently reported by Nguyen et al. The first one afforded N-thiobenzoylaminobutanol in 62% yield [57], and the second one is not applicable to N-thioaroyl derivatives [58]. Thus, a diacylation–thionation–saponification sequence [59] was implemented (Table 1), and the individual steps optimized using 4-aminobutanol and benzoyl chloride as the starting materials.

Table 1: Synthesis of compounds 3.

[Graphic 1]
Compd. R 1 2 3 Overall yield [%]a
a C6H5 95b 95 95 85
b 4-ClC6H4 90b 93 87 73
c 4-CH3C6H4 93b 95 82 72
d 4-OCH3C6H4 95b 93 87 77
e 4-NO2C6H4 90b quant. 91 82
f 2,4-Cl2C6H3 94b 87 98 80
g 2-FC6H4 96b 90 90 78
h 2-CH3C6H4 90b 92 83 69
i C6H5CHCH 95b 95 80 72
j C6H5CH2 86b 80 80 55
k C5H10 70b quant. 93 65
l isopropyl 93c,d 85 71e 56
m tert-butyl 77c,d 87 89e 59

aYields correspond to pure compounds. bThe reaction was performed with the acid chloride. cThe reaction was performed with the anhydride. dThe reaction was carried out at reflux for 48 h. eThe reaction was carried out using 10% NaOH/methanol at reflux for 4 h.

The diacylation step using pyridine as the base required 24 h for completion and gave a disappointingly low yield due to partial hydrolysis of the ester moiety, while triethylamine performed comparatively better (80%, 24 h). Finally, addition of 10 mol % of DMAP led to a higher yield (95%) in 1 h at room temperature. Using the optimized protocol, compounds 1a–k were synthesized in high to excellent yields (Table 1). The more sterically hindered derivatives 1l,m required significantly longer reaction times.

Thionation of the resulting amidoester 1a with Lawesson's reagent (LR) was then examined. Using the reagent in excess, (LR/substrate 2.5:1, toluene, reflux) the reaction was chemoselective toward the amide group, and compound 2a was obtained in high yield (93%), although the unreacted LR complicated the isolation and purification of the product. Lowering the molar ratio of the starting materials to strictly equivalent 0.5:1 maintained the yield (95%) and considerably simplified the procedure, suppressing collateral products arising from decomposition of the reagent. Under these conditions, compounds 2a–m were synthesized in excellent yields (Table 1).

Cleavage of the thioamide-ester 2a with K2CO3 in methanol/water (30 min, 70 °C) afforded thioamido alcohol 3a (95%). Thioaroyl derivatives 3b–k were prepared in high to quantitative yields under these experimental conditions, except for the more sterically hindered 2-methylphenyl derivative 2h, which required a longer reaction time (1 h) to achieve complete conversion to the desired product. Saponification of the less reactive isobutyryl and pivaloyl derivatives 2l,m required the use of a stronger base, longer reaction times and higher temperature (10% NaOH, reflux, 4 h).

The overall output of the optimized sequence (Table 1, last column) ranged from 69 to 85% for thioaroyl derivatives, and compares favourably with the literature data [57] for 3a (85 vs 62%, respectively). Compounds 3j,l,m afforded slightly lower overall yields.

Synthesis of tetrahydro-1,3-thiazepines

With the required precursors in hand, we examined next the MW-assisted heterocyclization of N-thiobenzoylaminobutanol promoted by PPA esters. Using PPE/CHCl3, irradiation of precursor 3a in a closed vessel MW reactor (1 min, 90 °C) afforded tetrahydrothiazepine 4a in 61% yield. The same reaction was then tested with PPSE/CH2Cl2 as the dehydrating agent, leading to poorer results (30% yield). Based on our previous experience on related heterocycles, the cyclization was performed with PPSE under solvent-free conditions (8 min, 90 °C), delivering 73% of compound 4a as the only product.

As already mentioned, Wipf et al. had previously reported that cyclization of N-thiobenzoylaminobutanol with PEG-linked Burgess reagent and under Mitsunobu conditions led to significant amounts of N-thiobenzoylpyrrolidine [32]. In fact, this kinetically favoured competitive reaction also occurs in the closely related cyclization of N-benzoylaminobutanol with PPSE, which leads exclusively to N-acylpyrrolidines. In order to ascertain the structure of compound 4a, we compared its NMR spectra with those of N-thiobenzoylpyrrolidine (Scheme 1) [60], confirming further the identity of the tetrahydrothiazepine by analysis of its 2D NMR spectra (see Supporting Information File 1).

[1860-5397-16-5-i1]

Scheme 1: Chemical shift data for N-thiobenzoylpiperidine and compound 4a.

Using the optimized experimental conditions, several novel 2-aryl-1,4,5,6-tetrahydro-1,3-thiazepines were synthesized in good to high yields (Table 2). Due to the different reactivity of each substrate, irradiation times and temperatures were individually adjusted by monitoring the disappearance of substrate (TLC). Derivatives 4f–h, bearing ortho-substituted phenyl groups afforded slightly lower yields. Our results compare favourably with the previously reported data (58% yield of 4a, reaction time 48 h) as the method combines the efficiency of PPSE with the advantages of MAOS: very short reaction times and suppression of collateral products. In view of the encouraging results obtained hitherto, we examined next the applicability of the method to the synthesis of derivatives bearing non-aromatic 2-substituents, of which no examples were found in the literature. Previous studies on related cyclic iminoethers [54] had shown that 2-alkyl derivatives are comparatively more prone to hydrolysis, require harsher reaction conditions and afford significantly lower yields. Despite this, and in order to extend the scope of the method, we attempted the cyclization of some representative examples of this type of substitution. The necessary precursors were prepared by the sequence depicted in Table 1. Regarding the cyclodehydration reaction, in the same experimental conditions than before (neat PPSE, 1–8 min, 90 °C), thioamidoalcohols 3i–k afforded the corresponding tetrahydro-1,3-thiazepines 4i–k in good to high yields as the only products (Table 2). Ring closure of the more sterically hindered isobutyryl and pivaloyl thioamidoalcohols 3l,m was also successful, requiring slightly higher temperatures.

Table 2: Synthesis of 4,5,6,7-tetrahydrothiazepines 4.

[Graphic 2]
Compd. 4 R Time (min) Temp. (°C) Yield (%)a
a C6H5 8 90 73
b 4-ClC6H4 1 90 82
c 4-CH3C6H4 1 90 72
d 4-OCH3C6H4 1 90 80
e 4-NO2C6H4 2 90 65
f 2,4-Cl2C6H3 2 90 70
g 2-FC6H4 3 90 64
h 2-CH3C6H4 4 90 65
i C6H5CHCH 2 90 65
j C6H5CH2 2 90 75
k C5H10 2 90 80
l isopropyl 8 100 95
m tert-butyl 8 100 40

aYields correspond to pure compounds.

Mechanistic considerations

The cyclization of 4-amidobutanols promoted by PPA esters leads exclusively to N-acylpyrrolidines instead of the corresponding tetrahydro-1,3-oxazepines. This unexpected reaction path is reasonable considering the relative ease of formation of five-membered rings as compared to the isomeric seven-membered heterocycles together with the relatively poor nucleophilicity of the carboxamide oxygen. An analogous effect was sometimes observed even in the sulfur analogues, as previously mentioned [32]. The differences between oxygen and sulfur regarding electronegativity and polarizability may explain the differential behaviour of the PPSE promoted ring closure of tetramethylenic amido and thioamido alcohols. In both cases, PPSE would activate the OH group for nucleophilic attack, and the plausible reaction mechanism would involve an intramolecular SN2-type displacement. However, the lower reactivity of the carboxamide oxygen (as an O-nucleophile), together with the comparatively high activation energy associated to the formation of a seven-membered heterocycle would favour the competitive ring closure leading to the five-membered ring (Scheme 2, reaction a), which would involve attack of the carboxamide nitrogen to the ω-carbon. On the other hand, the higher nucleophilicity of the sulfur in the thioamide would overcome the difficulty of the formation of the seven-membered ring, yielding exclusively the tetrahydrothiazepine (Scheme 2, reaction b).

[1860-5397-16-5-i2]

Scheme 2: PPSE promoted ring closure reactions of amido- and thioamido alcohols.

Conclusion

We have developed a general method for the synthesis of 2-aryltetrahydro-1,3-thiazepines, a heterocyclic core with very few examples in the literature. The method involves as the key step the microwave-assisted ring closure of thioamido alcohols promoted by PPSE, presumably via an intramolecular SN2-type displacement of the PPSE-activated OH group. The precursors were easily prepared in a three-step sequence from 4-aminobutanol in high overall yields. The whole synthetic procedure is expeditious and operationally simple, involving inexpensive and readily available starting materials and reagents. The cyclization step affords the desired heterocycles in good to high yields as the only products in a few minutes and is metal, additive and catalyst free. The scope of the method includes the synthesis of unprecedented examples of 2-alkyl, aralkyl and alkenyl derivatives.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Experimental procedures and characterization of new compounds.
Format: PDF Size: 4.6 MB Download

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Prof. A. Moglioni (Universidad de Buenos Aires. CONICET. Departamento de Farmacología. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica) for providing access to the microwave reactor.

Funding

This work was supported by the University of Buenos Aires (20020170100189BA).

References

  1. Kunze, B.; Jansen, R.; Pridzun, L.; Jurkiewicz, E.; Hunsmann, G.; Höfle, G.; Reichenbach, H. J. Antibiot. 1993, 46, 1752–1755. doi:10.7164/antibiotics.46.1752
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Gerwick, W. H.; Proteau, P. J.; Nagle, D. G.; Hamel, E.; Blokhin, A.; Slate, D. L. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 1243–1245. doi:10.1021/jo00085a006
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Randazzo, A.; Bifulco, G.; Giannini, C.; Bucci, M.; Debitus, C.; Cirino, G.; Gomez-Paloma, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10870–10876. doi:10.1021/ja010015c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Saxena, A. K.; Pandey, S. K.; Seth, P.; Singh, M. P.; Dikshit, M.; Carpy, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 2025–2034. doi:10.1016/s0968-0896(01)00082-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Boden, C. D. J.; Pattenden, G.; Ye, T. Synlett 1995, 417–419. doi:10.1055/s-1995-4993
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Michael, J. P.; Pattenden, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1–23. doi:10.1002/anie.199300013
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Carmeli, S.; Moore, R. E.; Patterson, G. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 2593–2596. doi:10.1016/s0040-4039(00)78793-4
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Jalal, M. A. F.; Hossain, M. B.; van der Helm, D.; Sanders-Loehr, J.; Actis, L. A.; Crosa, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 292–296. doi:10.1021/ja00183a044
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Boyce, R. J.; Mulqueen, G. C.; Pattenden, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5705–5708. doi:10.1016/s0040-4039(00)77284-4
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. White, J. D.; Kim, T.-S.; Nambu, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5612–5613. doi:10.1021/ja00125a034
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Betz, A.; Yu, L.; Reiher, M.; Gaumont, A.-C.; Jaffrès, P.-A.; Gulea, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2008, 693, 2499–2508. doi:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2008.04.044
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Le Maux, P.; Abrunhosa, I.; Berchel, M.; Simonneaux, G.; Gulea, M.; Masson, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 2569–2573. doi:10.1016/j.tetasy.2004.06.039
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Pican, S.; Gaumont, A.-C. Chem. Commun. 2005, 2393–2395. doi:10.1039/b501078k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Helmchen, G.; Krotz, A.; Ganz, K.-T.; Hansen, D. Synlett 1991, 257–259. doi:10.1055/s-1991-20699
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Du, D.-M.; Lu, S.-F.; Fang, T.; Xu, J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 3712–3715. doi:10.1021/jo050097d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Yamakuchi, M.; Matsunaga, H.; Tokuda, R.; Ishizuka, T.; Nakajima, M.; Kunieda, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 4019–4022. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2005.04.025
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Karodia, N. In Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry; Katrizky, A.; Ramsden, C.; Taylor, R. J. K.; Scriven, E. F. V., Eds.; Pergamon: London, 2008; Vol. 4, p 568.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Bourzat, J. D.; Cotrel, C.; Guyon, C.; Pitchen, P. 5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-oxa(or thia)zine derivatives, their preparation and compositions containing them. U.S. Patent US4994569, Feb 19, 1991.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Koketsu, M.; Tanaka, K.; Takenaka, Y.; Kwong, C. D.; Ishihara, H. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2002, 15, 307–310. doi:10.1016/s0928-0987(02)00014-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Hudhomme, P.; Toupet, L.; Duguay, G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1990, 1, 611–620. doi:10.1016/0957-4166(90)80011-m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Hudhomme, P.; Duguay, G. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1991, 128, 760–772.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Sharma, S. D.; Saluja, A.; Bhaduri, S. Indian J. Chem. 2000, 39b, 156–159.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Sharma, A.; Appukkuttan, P.; Van der Eycken, E. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1623–1637. doi:10.1039/c1cc15238f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Yet, L. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2963–3008. doi:10.1021/cr990407q
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Molander, G. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 603–609. doi:10.1021/ar960101v
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Illuminati, G.; Mandolini, L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 95–102. doi:10.1021/ar00064a001
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Galli, C.; Mandolini, L. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 3117–3125. doi:10.1002/1099-0690(200009)2000:18<3117::aid-ejoc3117>3.0.co;2-5
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Michaut, A.; Rodriguez, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5740–5750. doi:10.1002/anie.200600787
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Yates, J.; Rosinger, H. P.; Hackmann, J. T. Novel 2,6-dihalophenyl heterocyclic compounds and compositions containing them. GB Patent GB1013441A, Dec 15, 1965.
    The reaction was performed at ca. 100 °C.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Heine, H. W.; Mente, P. G. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 3076–3078. doi:10.1021/jo00820a002
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Iwakura, Y.; Nabeya, A.; Nishiguchi, T.; Ohkawa, K.-H. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 3352–3356. doi:10.1021/jo01348a056
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Wipf, P.; Hayes, G. B. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 6987–6998. doi:10.1016/s0040-4020(98)00341-x
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  33. Heredia, D. A.; Larghi, E. L.; Kaufman, T. S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 1397–1404. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201501566
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Stefańska, B.; Bontemps-Gracz, M. M.; Antonini, I.; Martelli, S.; Arciemiuk, M.; Piwkowska, A.; Rogacka, D.; Borowski, E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 1969–1975. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2005.01.023
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Yoshida, Y.; Mohri, K.; Isobe, K.; Itoh, T.; Yamamoto, K. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 6010–6015. doi:10.1021/jo9008645
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Sarma, T.; Panda, P. K.; Anusha, P. T.; Rao, S. V. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 188–191. doi:10.1021/ol102378g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Aron, Z. D.; Overman, L. E. Chem. Commun. 2004, 253–265. doi:10.1039/b309910e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Geist, J. G.; Lauw, S.; Illarionova, V.; Illarionov, B.; Fischer, M.; Gräwert, T.; Rohdich, F.; Eisenreich, W.; Kaiser, J.; Groll, M.; Scheurer, C.; Wittlin, S.; Alonso-Gómez, J. L.; Schweizer, W. B.; Bacher, A.; Diederich, F. ChemMedChem 2010, 5, 1092–1101. doi:10.1002/cmdc.201000083
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Agbaje, O. C.; Fadeyi, O. O.; Fadeyi, S. A.; Myles, L. E.; Okoro, C. O. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 989–992. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.12.022
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Hilmey, D. G.; Paquette, L. A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2067–2069. doi:10.1021/ol050669g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Niemczak, M.; Czerniak, K.; Kopczyński, T. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 1868–1873. doi:10.1039/c4nj02075h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. López, S. E.; Restrepo, J.; Salazar, J. J. Chem. Res. 2007, 497–502. doi:10.3184/030823407x245598
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  43. Eyley, S. C. The Aliphatic Friedel–Crafts Reaction. Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; 1991; Vol. 2, pp 707–731. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-052349-1.00045-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  44. Lidström, P.; Tierney, J.; Wathey, B.; Westman, J. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9225–9283. doi:10.1016/s0040-4020(01)00906-1
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  45. Blakemore, D. C.; Castro, L.; Churcher, I.; Rees, D. C.; Thomas, A. W.; Wilson, D. M.; Wood, A. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 383–394. doi:10.1038/s41557-018-0021-z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Paul, S.; Gupta, M.; Gupta, R.; Loupy, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3827–3829. doi:10.1016/s0040-4039(01)00505-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  47. Merriman, G. H.; Ma, L.; Shum, P.; McGarry, D.; Volz, F.; Sabol, J. S.; Gross, A.; Zhao, Z.; Rampe, D.; Wang, L.; Wirtz-Brugger, F.; Harris, B. A.; Macdonald, D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 435–438. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.10.052
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. García, M. B.; Torres, R. A.; Orelli, L. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 4857–4859. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.05.042
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  49. Díaz, J. E.; Bisceglia, J. Á.; Mollo, M. C.; Orelli, L. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 1895–1897. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.02.042
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  50. Díaz, J. E.; Gruber, N.; Orelli, L. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 6443–6445. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.09.097
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  51. Díaz, J. E.; Vanthuyne, N.; Rispaud, H.; Roussel, C.; Vega, D.; Orelli, L. R. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 1689–1695. doi:10.1021/jo502626f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  52. Díaz, J. E.; Mollo, M. C.; Orelli, L. R. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 2026–2031. doi:10.3762/bjoc.12.190
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  53. Díaz, J. E.; Mazzanti, A.; Orelli, L. R.; Mancinelli, M. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 4712–4720. doi:10.1021/acsomega.9b00192
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  54. Mollo, M. C.; Orelli, L. R. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 6116–6119. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03122
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  55. Verbraeken, B.; Hullaert, J.; van Guyse, J.; Van Hecke, K.; Winne, J.; Hoogenboom, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 17404–17408. doi:10.1021/jacs.8b10918
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  56. Ozturk, T.; Ertas, E.; Mert, O. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5210–5278. doi:10.1021/cr040650b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  57. Nguyen, T. B.; Ermolenko, L.; Al-Mourabit, A. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 4274–4277. doi:10.1021/ol3020368
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  58. Nguyen, T. B.; Tran, M. Q.; Ermolenko, L.; Al-Mourabit, A. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 310–313. doi:10.1021/ol403345e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  59. Lafargue, P.; Guenot, P.; Lellouche, J.-P. Synlett 1995, 171–172. doi:10.1055/s-1995-4886
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  60. Bellec, C.; Gaurat, O. Can. J. Chem. 2004, 82, 1289–1293. doi:10.1139/v04-088
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2020 Mollo et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular requires that the authors and source are credited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

 
Back to Article List