Copper-based fluorinated reagents for the synthesis of CF2R-containing molecules (R ≠ F)

  1. Louise Ruyet and
  2. Tatiana Besset

Normandie Univ, INSA Rouen, UNIROUEN, CNRS, COBRA (UMR 6014), 76000 Rouen, France

  1. Corresponding author email

This article is part of the thematic issue "Copper-catalyzed reactions for organic synthesis".

Guest Editor: O. Riant
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2020, 16, 1051–1065. doi:10.3762/bjoc.16.92
Received 19 Mar 2020, Accepted 29 Apr 2020, Published 18 May 2020

Abstract

Over the years, the development of new methodologies for the introduction of various fluorinated motifs has gained a significant interest due to the importance of fluorine-containing molecules in the pharmaceutical and agrochemical industries. In a world eager to eco-friendlier tools, the need for innovative methods has been growing. To address these two challenges, copper-based reagents were developed to introduce CF2H, CF2RF, CF2CH3, CF2PO(OEt)2 and CF2SO2Ph motifs on a broad range of substrates. Copper-based fluorinated reagents have the advantage of being inexpensive and generally in situ generated or prepared in a few steps, which make them convenient to use. In this review, an overview of the recent advances made for the synthesis of fluorinated molecules using copper-based fluorinated reagents will be given.

Keywords: copper; difluoromethylation; fluorinated reagents; fluorine chemistry; synthetic methodologies

Introduction

In a society in which fluorinated molecules are playing a pivotal role in pharmaceutical and agrochemical industries as well as in materials science [1-4], the quest for innovation in the organofluorine chemistry field is of high importance. In that context, the development of new strategies is an important driving force [5-14], offering efficient and original tools to introduce a fluorine atom or a fluorinated moiety of unique properties [15]. Despite the tremendous advances made in that field, key synthetic challenges remain to synthesize fluorinated scaffolds. Among the different developed strategies to ravel synthetic issues, the use of inexpensive and readily available copper-based fluorinated reagents appeared over the years as a powerful tool in various transformations for the introduction of fluorinated moieties. Such strategy has already demonstrated a significant synthetic value for the trifluoromethylation of various compounds [16-27]. In contrast, available reagents for the incorporation of a CF2R (R = H, alkyl, RF, FG; FG = functional group) moiety remain restricted, despite the potential of these functionalized fluorinated moieties. In this review, the main contributions in the field of copper-based reagents for the introduction of CF2H, CF2FG, CF2Me and CF2RF moieties over the last 5 years (period of 2014–2019) will be summarized. The design and the elaboration of either pre-formed or in situ-generated copper-based reagents was an efficient tool in several reactions. Note that only transformations involving the use of such copper-based reagents will be depicted and copper-catalyzed reactions are therefore beyond the scope of this review.

Review

Copper-based difluoromethylating reagents

In this section the key advances made to access copper-based difluoromethylating reagents are summarized. The CF2H moiety [28-32], a well recognized alcohol and thiol bioisoster, is particularly attractive due to its unique features [33-36]. Besides, this residue is present in several bioactive compounds such as Deracoxib and Thiazopyr. In comparison with trifluoromethylcopper complexes, the difluoromethylcopper ones are less stable as demonstrated by the work of Burton in 2007 [37]. Investigations on the in situ synthesis of difluoromethylcopper from a difluoromethylcadmium source at low temperature and the study of its reactivity with various classes of compounds such as allylic halides, propargylic halides and tosylates, iodoalkynes and reactive alkyl halides were realized. It was established that CuCF2H readily decompose into 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane and cis-difluoroethylene. From this pioneer work, attention was paid either to the design of new synthetic pathways for the synthesis of a well-defined copper-based reagent or to new tools for the in situ generation of an active CuCF2H species and its application in several transformations.

Pre-defined difluoromethylating reagents

In the quest for well-defined and isolable MCF2H species, Sanford depicted for the first time in 2017 the synthesis and characterization of isolable difluoromethylcopper(I) complexes [38]. The latter were prepared in a two-step sequence starting from the corresponding (NHC)CuCl as precursors in the presence of NaOt-Bu followed by the addition of TMSCF2H (Scheme 1). The latter was prepared in a one step synthesis after reduction of the Ruppert–Prakash reagent with sodium borohydride [39]. The key of success was the use of bulky IPr and SIPr ligands to stabilize the organometallic species. Indeed, in the case of IPr as a ligand, the complex was stable in solution at room temperature for at least 24 hours. The reactivity of the complex was then studied in stoichiometric reactions with aryl iodides and iodonium salts. The difluoromethylation reaction was smoothly carried out at 90 °C with electron-rich and electron-poor aryl iodides. However, the reaction was more efficient with electron-poor aryl iodides (Scheme 1). It is important to highlight that, in the course of their study for the synthesis of a stable and isolable (NHC)CuCF2H complex and the study of its reactivity, Sanford and co-workers demonstrated the possibility to develop a catalytic version of the reaction through the in situ generation of the active (IPr)CuCF2H, starting from (IPr)CuCl [38].

[1860-5397-16-92-i1]

Scheme 1: Synthesis of the first isolable (NHC)CuCF2H complexes from TMSCF2H and their application for the synthesis of difluoromethylated arenes from aryl iodides. aYields were determined by 19F NMR with fluorobenzene as the internal standard. bReaction carried out at 120 °C.

In situ-generated copper-based difluoromethylating reagents

Although the review focused on the 2014–2019 period, a brief overview of seminal major advances should be given. In 2012, Hartwig and co-worker studied the difluoromethylation reaction of aryl and vinyl iodides by a copper-mediated transformation using TMSCF2H as the fluorinated source [39]. In this work, CuCF2H was suggested as the active species to promote the expected transformation. They highlighted that the formation of a cuprate species: Cu(CF2H)2, favoured by the presence of an excess of TMSCF2H, might act as a reservoir of the unstable and reactive CuCF2H species. Xu and Qing reported a similar strategy for the difluoromethylation of electron-poor (hetero)aryl iodides at room temperature, using only 2.4 equivalents of TMSCF2H [40]. Note that the use of a strong base (t-BuOK) and 1,10-phenanthroline as a ligand was crucial in their system. In 2012, Prakash also studied the in situ generation of CuCF2H from n-Bu3SnCF2H, the presence of DMF being the key to stabilize the CuCF2H intermediate [41] (Scheme 2).

[1860-5397-16-92-i2]

Scheme 2: Pioneer works for the in situ generation of CuCF2H from TMSCF2H and from n-Bu3SnCF2H. Phen = 1,10-phenanthroline.

From these seminal works, a handful of reports was then published by different research groups. In 2014, the group of Goossen astutely reported the in situ generation of the CuCF2H complex starting from TMSCF2H, CuSCN and CsF as an activator in DMF. This approach was successfully applied in a Sandmeyer-type difluoromethylation reaction (Scheme 3) [42]. Starting from (hetero)aryldiazonium salts, a panel of difluoromethylated arenes and heteroarenes was obtained (26 examples, up to 84% yield). Note that the transformation was also carried out starting from 4-methoxyaniline followed by the in situ formation of the corresponding diazonium salt.

[1860-5397-16-92-i3]

Scheme 3: A Sandmeyer-type difluoromethylation reaction via the in situ generation of CuCF2H from TMSCF2H. a 19F NMR yields determined using 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol as the internal standard.

In the same vein, the authors used this in situ generation of a CuCF2H species to access high value-added difluoromethylthiolated molecules starting from organothiocyanates [43]. With this approach, they then developed a one pot, two-step sequence (generation of the organothiocyanates followed by the difluoromethylation step) for the functionalization of alkyl bromides, alkyl mesylates, aryldiazonium salts [43] as well as electron-rich arenes [44] (Scheme 4).

[1860-5397-16-92-i4]

Scheme 4: A one pot, two-step sequence for the difluoromethylthiolation of various classes of compounds via the in situ generation of CuCF2H from TMSCF2H.

In 2015, the group of Qing investigated the oxidative difluoromethylation reaction of terminal alkynes with TMSCF2H via a copper-mediated reaction [45]. Using a stoichiometric amount of CuI, in the presence of t-BuOK and 9,10-phenanthraquinone, the functionalization of a panel of (hetero)aromatic and aliphatic terminal alkynes was achieved (Scheme 5). A good functional group tolerance was observed as alkynes bearing a cyano, ester, bromo or amino group among others were suitable substrates. Based on 19F NMR studies, the authors suggested the following mechanism: first the in situ generation of a CuCF2H complex from TMSCF2H in equilibrium with the corresponding cuprate (Cu(CF2H)2) occurred followed by the reaction with terminal alkynes under basic conditions. The resulting organocopper derivative was then oxidized resulting in the formation of the desired products.

[1860-5397-16-92-i5]

Scheme 5: A copper-mediated oxidative difluoromethylation of terminal alkynes via the in situ generation of a CuCF2H complex.

Note that in 2018 the same group reported the copper-mediated oxidative difluoromethylation of heteroarenes under similar reaction conditions (TMSCF2H, CuCN, 9,10-phenanthrenequinone, t-BuOK in NMP) [46]. Not only oxazoles (17 examples, up to 87% yield) were difluoromethylated but a variety of other heteroarenes turned out to be suitable such as pyridine, imidazole, benzo[d]thiazole, benzo[b]thiophene, benzo[d]oxazole, thiazole and thiophene derivatives (Scheme 6).

[1860-5397-16-92-i6]

Scheme 6: A copper-mediated oxidative difluoromethylation of heteroarenes.

Copper-based CF2FG-containing reagents

Besides the traditional CF3 and CF2H groups, a strong interest was devoted to other CF2R groups (R = PO(OEt)2, SO2Ph and Me). In that aim, the development of copper-based reagents to introduce them onto molecules was studied over the last years and the major advances will be summarized in this section.

An in situ-generated copper-based CF2PO(OEt)2 reagent

As a bioisostere of the phosphonate group [47], a lot of attention was paid to the difluoromethylphosphonate residue as well as the development of efficient methodologies to introduce it onto molecules [48]. In that context, main contributions were made by the groups of Poisson and Goossen.

In the course of their study regarding the synthesis of difluoromethylphosphonate-containing molecules, Poisson and co-workers investigated the in situ generation of a CuCF2PO(OEt)2 species and its application to functionalize various classes of compounds [49-54]. The active species was prepared from TMSCF2PO(OEt)2, a copper salt and an activator. Note that the TMSCF2PO(OEt)2 was easily prepared from the commercially available BrCF2PO(OEt)2 and TMSCl under basic conditions [49]. The access to CF2PO(OEt)2-containing arenes was obtained after a Sandmeyer-type reaction (Scheme 7, reaction a) [49]. The reaction was efficient, although heteroaryl diazonium salts were reluctant in this reaction. To overcome these limitations, hypervalent iodinated species were used as substrates. The copper-mediated reaction with λ3-iodanes demonstrated a large functional group tolerance and was efficiently applied to the synthesis of CF2PO(OEt)2-containing (hetero)arenes, alkenes and alkynes (Scheme 7, reactions b–d) [50]. Later on, the same group depicted the Pd-catalyzed introduction of the CF2PO(OEt)2 residue on (hetero)aryl iodides [51] by using an in situ-generated copper-based reagent (19 examples, up to 80% yield, Scheme 7e).

[1860-5397-16-92-i7]

Scheme 7: Synthesis of difluoromethylphosphonate-containing molecules using the in situ-generated CuCF2PO(OEt)2 species.

With a similar method and in the presence of 1,10-phenanthroline as a ligand, the functionalization of alkenyl halides (8 examples, up to 82% yield), allyl halides (7 examples, up to 99% yield) and benzyl bromides (6 examples, up to 87% yield) was investigated (Scheme 8) [52].

[1860-5397-16-92-i8]

Scheme 8: Synthesis of difluoromethylphosphonate-containing molecules using in situ-generated CuCF2PO(OEt)2 species with 1,10-phenantroline as a ligand. Phen: 1,10-phenanthroline.

Finally, the Poisson’s group developed a methodology for the Ullman cross-coupling reaction between the in situ-generated CuCF2PO(OEt)2 and aryl iodides containing a coordinating group (e.g., CO2CH3, COCH3, NO2), at the ortho-position of the halide [52]. This reaction broadened the portfolio of CF2PO(OEt)2-containing molecules leading to the corresponding compounds in good to excellent yields (Scheme 9). Note that the versatility of this methodology was further proved through its application to disulfides [52] with moderate to good yields.

[1860-5397-16-92-i9]

Scheme 9: Synthesis of difluoromethylphosphonate-containing molecules using in situ-generated CuCF2PO(OEt)2 species by an Ullman cross-coupling. CG = coordinating group.

Poisson and co-workers also reported the reaction of the CuCF2PO(OEt)2 reagent with α-diazocarbonyl derivatives. Depending on the copper salt used for the generation of the copper reagent, the reaction with α-diazocarbonyl derivatives provided either the α-fluorovinylphosphonate, in a stereoselective fashion, or the SCF2PO(OEt)2 derivatives [53]. In the same vein, the reaction of the CuCF2PO(OEt)2 species, generated from CuSCN, with α-bromoketones provided the α-SCF2PO(OEt)2-containing ketones [54] (Scheme 10).

[1860-5397-16-92-i10]

Scheme 10: Synthesis of (diethylphosphono)difluoromethylthiolated molecules using in situ-generated CuCF2PO(OEt)2 species. Phen: 1,10-phenanthroline.

In 2019, the group of Goossen developed an approach to access SCF2PO(OEt)2-containing arenes based on a Sandmeyer thiocyanation reaction followed by a Langlois-type nucleophilic substitution of the cyano group by the CF2PO(OEt)2 residue [55]. Several (diethylphosphono)difluoromethylthiolated products were obtained and this report further showcased the potential of using a copper-based reagent for the introduction of fluorinated moieties as this reaction involved the in situ generation of a suitable CuCF2PO(OEt)2 species (Scheme 11).

[1860-5397-16-92-i11]

Scheme 11: Access to (diethylphosphono)difluoromethylthiolated molecules via the in situ generation of CuCF2PO(OEt)2 species.

An in situ-generated copper-based CF2SO2Ph reagent

As a long standing interest to the PhSO2CF2 moiety [56-60] thanks to its unique features, the group of Hu investigated the generation of the PhSO2CF2Cu species from PhSO2CF2TMS, CuI and CsF in DMF [61] (Scheme 12). Note that PhSO2CF2TMS was prepared from PhSO2CF2Br after treatment with n-BuLi and TMSCl [61]. Due to its relatively low stability at room temperature, PhSO2CF2Cu was in situ generated and applied to the (phenylsulfonyl)difluoromethylation reaction of propargyl chlorides and alkynyl halides, offering an access to the corresponding fluorinated allenes (6 examples) and alkynes (8 examples). In 2016, still interested by this versatile fluorinated moiety, the same authors demonstrated that the PhSO2CF2Cu species might be prepared from difluoromethylphenylsulfone (PhSO2CF2H) and used it to functionalize an array of (hetero)aromatic boronic acids [62] (Scheme 12). The transformation showed a good functional group tolerance (aldehyde, CN, halogens). Note that the synthetic utility of the CF2SO2Ph group was further demonstrated by its conversion into the high value-added CF2H moiety after treatment with Mg/AcOH/AcONa.

[1860-5397-16-92-i12]

Scheme 12: Synthesis of (phenylsulfonyl)difluoromethyl-containing molecules via the in situ generation of CuCF2SO2Ph species.

An in situ-generated copper-based CF2CH3 reagent

A strong interest was dedicated to the CF2CH3 residue, an important moiety in medicinal chemistry [63]. Among the different approaches developed to synthesize CF2CH3-containing molecules, Wang, Hu and co-workers demonstrated the possibility to use 1,1-difluoroethylsilane (TMSCF2CH3) as a precursor for the in situ generation of the corresponding CuCF2CH3 species [64]. The synthetic utility of this copper-based reagent was illustrated through the 1,1-difluoroethylation of diaryliodonium salts, leading to the corresponding (1,1-difluoroethyl)arenes in moderate to high yields (Scheme 13). The transformation turned out to be functional group tolerant and even heteroaromatic compounds were functionalized.

[1860-5397-16-92-i13]

Scheme 13: Copper-mediated 1,1-difluoroethylation of diaryliodonium salts by using the in situ-generated CuCF2CH3 species.

Copper-based CF2RF reagents

Due to the importance of perfluorinated moieties [2] and since their synthesis could not be achieved from the fluorination of the corresponding alkyl chains like in case of perfluoroalkyl arenes, several research groups investigated the synthesis of CF2RF-containing molecules via the use of perfluoroalkyl copper species. Before 2014, key contributions were made by the groups of Kremlev, Tyrra [65], Hartwig [66,67] and Grushin [68] as briefly summarized below. These major advances paved the way towards the synthesis of important pentafluoroethylated and more generally perfluoroalkylated molecules. Kremlev, Tyrra and co-workers depicted the in situ generation of a CuCF2CF3 species by mixing Zn(CF3)Br·2DMF and CuBr [65], and its application for the functionalization of (hetero)aryl halides (Scheme 14).

[1860-5397-16-92-i14]

Scheme 14: Pioneer works for the pentafluoroethylation and heptafluoropropylation using a copper-based reagent. Phen = 1,10-phenanthroline. a 19F NMR yields determined using 1,3-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzene as the internal standard.

In the course of their studies to develop stable and well-defined copper reagents for perfluoroalkylation reactions [66], Hartwig developed in 2011 the (Phen)CuCF3 and (Phen)CuCF2CF2CF3 complexes from inexpensive reagents. Indeed, when mixing (CuOt-Bu)4, 1,10-phenanthroline and the corresponding TMSRF, the perfluoroalkyl copper complexes were isolated for the first time (Scheme 14, a). One year later, they demonstrated that these copper-based reagents ((Phen)CuCF2RF, RF = F, CF3 and CF2CF3) were efficient in a two-step sequence reaction (borylation/perfluoroalkylation) allowing the functionalization of either sterically hindered arenes or aryl bromides with the CF2CF3 and CF2CF2CF3 moieties (Scheme 14, b) [67]. In 2013, the group of Grushin reported the synthesis, characterization and application of a copper-based pentafluoroethylating reagent (Scheme 14) [68]. Using the cost-efficient pentafluoroethane as a precursor, the (K(DMF)2)(t-BuO)Cu(CF2CF3) complex was prepared either from the pre-isolated (K(DMF))Cu(Ot-Bu)2 or in situ from CuCl, t-BuOK in DMF in a nearly quantitative yield. The copper reagent was used for the pentafluoroethylation of a panel of (hetero)aryl iodides and bromides (up to 99% 19F NMR yield) and its synthetic utility was further demonstrated with the functionalization of different classes of compounds (benzyl and vinyl bromides, 4-biphenylboronic acid, phenylacetylene for instance).

From these pioneering reports of perfluoroalkylation (trifluoromethylation, pentafluoroethylation and heptafluoropropylation), several groups studied the synthesis and/or the application of copper-based reagents in various transformations as depicted in this section. This latter will be organized into two sub-sections depending if the CuRF-reagent was well-defined or in situ generated.

Well-defined pentafluoroethylating reagents

In 2014, a report from Hartwig dealt with the copper-mediated perfluororalkyaltion of (hetero)aryl bromides using the previously developed PhenCuRF [69]. Although the trifluoromethylation reaction was mainly studied, the methodology was efficiently extended to the pentafluoroethylation of various heteroarenes such as pyridine, pyrimidine and quinolone derivatives, for instance, when the PhenCuCF2CF3 complex was used as the pentafluoroethyl source (24 examples, up to 99% 19F NMR yield and up to 93% isolated yield, Scheme 15). Note that a complete mechanistic study was recently reported to explain the reactivity of this well-designed complex [70].

[1860-5397-16-92-i15]

Scheme 15: Pentafluoroethylation of (hetero)aryl bromides using the (Phen)CuCF2CF3 complex. 19F NMR yields were determined using 4-trifluoromethoxyanisole as the internal standard. aIsolated yields.

In 2015, Grushin reported the generation of four well-defined CuC2F5 complexes, namely (Ph3P)2CuCF2CF3, (bpy)CuCF2CF3, (IPr*)CuCF2CF3 and (Ph3P)Cu(Phen)CF2CF3. The reactivity of the latter was studied for the synthesis of pentafluoroethyl ketones from acyl chlorides [71]. Indeed, the pentafluoroethylation of a large panel of acyl chlorides (23 examples) was achieved illustrating the synthetic utility and the efficiency of the newly designed (Ph3P)Cu(phen)CF2CF3 reagent (Scheme 16).

[1860-5397-16-92-i16]

Scheme 16: Synthesis of pentafluoroethyl ketones using the (Ph3P)Cu(phen)CF2CF3 reagent. 19F NMR yields were given using 1,3-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzene as the internal standard.

Huang and Weng and co-workers reported the synthesis of air-stable perfluorocarboxylatocopper(I) complexes and their use in the perfluoroalkylation of (hetero)aryl halides [72]. By mixing t-BuOCu, in situ generated from CuCl and t-BuONa, with 1,10-phenanthroline, followed by a reaction with perfluorocarboxylic acids, four (Phen)2Cu(O2CCF2RF) complexes were synthesized (RF = CF3, CF2CF3, CF2CF2CF3 and CF2CF2CF2CF3). The reaction was efficient (65 examples, up to 97% yield), showed a good functional group tolerance (i.e., cyano, ester, ketone) and even heteroarenes such as pyridine, quinoline and quinoxaline were functionalized with the four fluorinated moieties (Scheme 17).

[1860-5397-16-92-i17]

Scheme 17: Synthesis of (Phen)2Cu(O2CCF2RF) and functionalization of (hetero)aryl iodides.

In situ-generated copper-based pentafluoroethylating reagents

Several research groups investigated the generation of a CuCF2CF3 species from different fluorinated precursors offering various technological solutions.

In 2014, a study from Mikami reported the functionalization of a panel of (hetero)arylboronic acids (10 examples, up to 95% yield) and (hetero)aryl bromides (11 examples, up to 98% 19F NMR yield) via the in situ generation of the suitable CuCF2CF3 from CuCl, KOt-Bu or NaOt-Bu and ethyl pentafluoropropionate [73]. Note that the methodology was also applied to the functionalization of a vinylboronic acid and a vinyl bromide (Scheme 18).

[1860-5397-16-92-i18]

Scheme 18: Pentafluoroethylation of arylboronic acids and (hetero)aryl bromides via the in situ-generated CuCF2CF3 species from ethyl pentafluoropropionate and CuCl. aYields were determined by 19F NMR using benzotrifluoride (BTF) or trifluoromethoxybenzene as internal standards. b90 °C, 72 h. c80 °C, 24 h. d80 °C, 48 h. e90 °C, 48 h.

More recently, in the course of their investigation to generate a CuCF3 reagent from a cyclic-protected hexafluoroacetone, an air-stable liquid trifluoromethylating reagent, and KCu(Ot-Bu)2, the group of Mikami showed that a CF2CF3 analog (Scheme 19) was prepared in a similar way and applied for the pentafluoroethylation of aromatic derivatives [74] (2 examples).

[1860-5397-16-92-i19]

Scheme 19: In situ generation of CuCF2CF3 species from a cyclic-protected hexafluoroacetone and KCu(Ot-Bu)2. 19F NMR yields were determined using benzotrifluoride (BTF) as the internal standard.

In 2015, Grushin and co-workers further investigated the functionalization of vinyl halides with CuRF reagents generated from inexpensive fluoroform (RF = CF3) and pentafluoroethane (CF3CF2H) [75]. Both trifluoromethylation and pentafluoethylation of vinyl bromides and iodides were efficiently achieved in high yields under mild reaction conditions. Noteworthy, the transformation turned out to be functional group tolerant and highly chemo- and stereroselective (Scheme 20).

[1860-5397-16-92-i20]

Scheme 20: Pentafluoroethylation of bromo- and iodoalkenes. Only examples of isolated compounds were depicted.

The group of Hu studied the fluoroalkylation of aryl halides. Indeed, a copper(0)-mediated reductive cross-coupling reaction between the iodobenzene and various 2-bromo-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl derivatives (RCF2CF2Br) was developed presumably involving a RCF2CF2Cu species (Scheme 21) [76].

[1860-5397-16-92-i21]

Scheme 21: Fluoroalkylation of aryl halides via a RCF2CF2Cu species.

In 2015, Yagupolskii and co-workers investigated the synthesis of perfluoroalkylcopper reagents [77]. Depending on the reaction conditions they were able to access to perfluoroorganolithium copper species or perfluroalkylcopper derivatives from iodoperfluoroalkanes in reaction with either n-BuLi or copper powder, respectively (Scheme 22).

[1860-5397-16-92-i22]

Scheme 22: Synthesis of perfluoroorganolithium copper species or perfluroalkylcopper derivatives from iodoperfluoroalkanes.

In 2017, the group of Hu offered an original synthetic route to the generation of the PhenCuCF2CF3 reagent [78]. Indeed, they demonstrated that the Ruppert–Prakash reagent was a suitable source for the generation of tetrafluoroethylene in the presence of a catalytic amount of NaI. Then, the cupration of the tetrafluoroethylene led to the formation of the expected PhenCuCF2CF3 reagent (Scheme 23). This constituted a complementary approach to the existing ones for its synthesis, as it avoided the use of TMSCF2CF3 or CF3CF2H. This copper-based reagent was then used for the pentafluoroethylation of iodoarenes [78]. The transformation was efficient and turned out to be functional group tolerant. The same group extended their protocol to the functionalization of aryldiazonium salts [79]. Very recently, a similar protocol was applied to the pentafluoroethylation of (hetero)aryl halides as well as alkenyl iodides derived from natural compounds (e.g., glycals, nucleosides and nucleobases) [80].

[1860-5397-16-92-i23]

Scheme 23: Formation of the PhenCuCF2CF3 reagent by means of TFE and pentafluoroethylation of iodoarenes and aryldiazonium salts.

In 2018, Hu and co-workers reported a complementary approach for the pentafluoroethylation of aryl iodides using TMSCF3 for the formation of CuCF2CF3 [81]. They suggested that in the presence of CuCl, KF and TMSCF3, the corresponding CuCF3 species will be formed and a subsequent homologation step involving a putative copper difluorocarbene will allow the formation of the CuCF2CF3 species. With this tool in hand, a panel of aryl iodides was functionalized (Scheme 24).

[1860-5397-16-92-i24]

Scheme 24: Generation of a CuCF2CF3 reagent from TMSCF3 and applications.

Conclusion

This review aims at providing an overview of the recent advances made since 2014 for the construction of CF2R-containing molecules (R ≠ F) using versatile and efficient copper-based reagents. Groundbreaking advances were made in the synthesis of well-defined copper-based reagents and innovative strategies were developed to generate in situ CuRf complexes from various precursors. Unprecedented transformations were successfully achieved using these copper-based reagents and these efficient synthetic tools opened new perspectives in the very active research field of organofluorine chemistry. Nevertheless, this field is still in its infancy and milestones towards copper-based difluoromethylating reagents are expected in the upcoming years.

Funding

This work was partially supported by Normandie Université (NU), the Région Normandie, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Rouen Normandie (URN), INSA Rouen Normandie, Labex SynOrg (ANR-11-LABX-0029) and Innovation Chimie Carnot (I2C). L.R. and T.B. thanks the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement no. 758710) and especially L.R. for a doctoral fellowship.

References

  1. Wang, J.; Sánchez-Roselló, M.; Aceña, J. L.; del Pozo, C.; Sorochinsky, A. E.; Fustero, S.; Soloshonok, V. A.; Liu, H. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 2432–2506. doi:10.1021/cr4002879
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Purser, S.; Moore, P. R.; Swallow, S.; Gouverneur, V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 320–330. doi:10.1039/b610213c
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  3. Gillis, E. P.; Eastman, K. J.; Hill, M. D.; Donnelly, D. J.; Meanwell, N. A. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 8315–8359. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00258
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Ilardi, E. A.; Vitaku, E.; Njardarson, J. T. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 2832–2842. doi:10.1021/jm401375q
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Liang, T.; Neumann, C. N.; Ritter, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 8214–8264. doi:10.1002/anie.201206566
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Besset, T.; Poisson, T.; Pannecoucke, X. Chem. – Eur. J. 2014, 20, 16830–16845. doi:10.1002/chem.201404537
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Ni, C.; Hu, J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5441–5454. doi:10.1039/c6cs00351f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Landelle, G.; Panossian, A.; Leroux, F. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2014, 14, 941–951. doi:10.2174/1568026614666140202210016
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Besset, T.; Jubault, P.; Pannecoucke, X.; Poisson, T. Org. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 1004–1010. doi:10.1039/c6qo00164e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Champagne, P. A.; Desroches, J.; Hamel, J.-D.; Vandamme, M.; Paquin, J.-F. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 9073–9174. doi:10.1021/cr500706a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Merino, E.; Nevado, C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 6598–6608. doi:10.1039/c4cs00025k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Egami, H.; Sodeoka, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 8294–8308. doi:10.1002/anie.201309260
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Belhomme, M.-C.; Besset, T.; Poisson, T.; Pannecoucke, X. Chem. – Eur. J. 2015, 21, 12836–12865. doi:10.1002/chem.201501475
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Song, H.-X.; Han, Q.-Y.; Zhao, C.-L.; Zhang, C.-P. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 1662–1731. doi:10.1039/c8gc00078f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. O'Hagan, D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 308–319. doi:10.1039/b711844a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Roy, S.; Gregg, B. T.; Gribble, G. W.; Le, V.-D.; Roy, S. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 2161–2195. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2011.01.002
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Jouvin, K.; Guissart, C.; Theunissen, C.; Evano, G. Emerging Areas in Copper-Mediated Trifluoromethylations: Catalytic and Oxidative Processes. In Copper-Mediated Cross-Coupling Reactions; Evano, G.; Blanchard, N., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp 515–530. doi:10.1002/9781118690659.ch14
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Danoun, G.; Bayarmagnai, B.; Grünberg, M. F.; Gooßen, L. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 7972–7975. doi:10.1002/anie.201304276
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Grushin, V. V. Chim. Oggi 2014, 32 (3), 81–88.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Liu, X.; Xu, C.; Wang, M.; Liu, Q. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 683–730. doi:10.1021/cr400473a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Morstein, J.; Hou, H.; Cheng, C.; Hartwig, J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 8054–8057. doi:10.1002/anie.201601163
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Lin, X.; Hou, C.; Li, H.; Weng, Z. Chem. – Eur. J. 2016, 22, 2075–2084. doi:10.1002/chem.201504306
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Zhang, C. J. Chem. Sci. 2017, 129, 1795–1805. doi:10.1007/s12039-017-1380-5
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Kaplan, P. T.; Lloyd, J. A.; Chin, M. T.; Vicic, D. A. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 2297–2303. doi:10.3762/bjoc.13.225
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Ye, Y.; Cheung, K. P. S.; He, L.; Tsui, G. C. Org. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 1511–1515. doi:10.1039/c8qo00191j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Geri, J. B.; Wade Wolfe, M. M.; Szymczak, N. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1381–1385. doi:10.1002/anie.201711316
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Li, G.-b.; Zhang, C.; Song, C.; Ma, Y.-d. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018, 14, 155–181. doi:10.3762/bjoc.14.11
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Landelle, G.; Panossian, A.; Pazenok, S.; Vors, J.-P.; Leroux, F. R. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013, 9, 2476–2536. doi:10.3762/bjoc.9.287
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Hu, J.; Zhang, W.; Wang, F. Chem. Commun. 2009, 7465–7478. doi:10.1039/b916463d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Gao, B.; Ni, C.; Hu, J. Chimia 2014, 68, 414–418. doi:10.2533/chimia.2014.414
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Rong, J.; Ni, C.; Hu, J. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2017, 6, 139–152. doi:10.1002/ajoc.201600509
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Levi, N.; Amir, D.; Gershonov, E.; Zafrani, Y. Synthesis 2019, 51, 4549–4567. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1690027
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Meanwell, N. A. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 2529–2591. doi:10.1021/jm1013693
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Kirk, K. L. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2008, 12, 305–321. doi:10.1021/op700134j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Graton, J.; Wang, Z.; Brossard, A.-M.; Gonçalves Monteiro, D.; Le Questel, J.-Y.; Linclau, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6176–6180. doi:10.1002/anie.201202059
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Giuffredi, G. T.; Gouverneur, V.; Bernet, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 10524–10528. doi:10.1002/anie.201303766
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Burton, D. J.; Hartgraves, G. A. J. Fluorine Chem. 2007, 128, 1198–1215. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2007.05.015
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Bour, J. R.; Kariofillis, S. K.; Sanford, M. S. Organometallics 2017, 36, 1220–1223. doi:10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00025
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  39. Fier, P. S.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 5524–5527. doi:10.1021/ja301013h
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  40. Jiang, X.-L.; Chen, Z.-H.; Xu, X.-H.; Qing, F.-L. Org. Chem. Front. 2014, 1, 774–776. doi:10.1039/c4qo00153b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Prakash, G. K. S.; Ganesh, S. K.; Jones, J.-P.; Kulkarni, A.; Masood, K.; Swabeck, J. K.; Olah, G. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 12090–12094. doi:10.1002/anie.201205850
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Matheis, C.; Jouvin, K.; Goossen, L. J. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 5984–5987. doi:10.1021/ol5030037
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  43. Bayarmagnai, B.; Matheis, C.; Jouvin, K.; Goossen, L. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 5753–5756. doi:10.1002/anie.201500899
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  44. Jouvin, K.; Matheis, C.; Goossen, L. J. Chem. – Eur. J. 2015, 21, 14324–14327. doi:10.1002/chem.201502914
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  45. Zhu, S.-Q.; Xu, X.-H.; Qing, F.-L. Org. Chem. Front. 2015, 2, 1022–1025. doi:10.1039/c5qo00186b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Zhu, S.-Q.; Liu, Y.-L.; Li, H.; Xu, X.-H.; Qing, F.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 11613–11617. doi:10.1021/jacs.8b08135
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  47. Ivanova, M. V.; Bayle, A.; Besset, T.; Pannecoucke, X.; Poisson, T. Chem. – Eur. J. 2016, 22, 10284–10293. doi:10.1002/chem.201601310
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Pannecoucke, X.; Poisson, T. Synlett 2016, 27, 2314–2326. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1562784
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  49. Bayle, A.; Cocaud, C.; Nicolas, C.; Martin, O. R.; Poisson, T.; Pannecoucke, X. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 3787–3792. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201500373
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  50. Ivanova, M. V.; Bayle, A.; Besset, T.; Poisson, T.; Pannecoucke, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 13406–13410. doi:10.1002/anie.201507130
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  51. Ivanova, M. V.; Besset, T.; Pannecoucke, X.; Poisson, T. Synthesis 2018, 50, 778–784. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1589140
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  52. Ivanova, M. V.; Bayle, A.; Besset, T.; Pannecoucke, X.; Poisson, T. Chem. – Eur. J. 2017, 23, 17318–17338. doi:10.1002/chem.201703542
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  53. Ivanova, M. V.; Bayle, A.; Besset, T.; Pannecoucke, X.; Poisson, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 14141–14145. doi:10.1002/anie.201608294
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  54. Ivanova, M. V.; Bayle, A.; Besset, T.; Pannecoucke, X.; Poisson, T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 2475–2480. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201700182
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  55. Ou, Y.; Gooßen, L. J. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2019, 8, 650–653. doi:10.1002/ajoc.201800461
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  56. Prakash, G. K. S.; Hu, J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 921–930. doi:10.1021/ar700149s
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  57. Zhang, W.; Zhu, J.; Hu, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 5006–5008. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.06.064
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  58. Hu, J. J. Fluorine Chem. 2009, 130, 1130–1139. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2009.05.016
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  59. He, Z.; Luo, T.; Hu, M.; Cao, Y.; Hu, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3944–3947. doi:10.1002/anie.201200140
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  60. He, Z.; Hu, M.; Luo, T.; Li, L.; Hu, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 11545–11547. doi:10.1002/anie.201206556
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  61. Zhu, J.; Wang, F.; Huang, W.; Zhao, Y.; Ye, W.; Hu, J. Synlett 2011, 899–902. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1259676
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  62. Li, X.; Zhao, J.; Hu, M.; Chen, D.; Ni, C.; Wang, L.; Hu, J. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 3657–3660. doi:10.1039/c5cc10550a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  63. Carbonnel, E.; Poisson, T.; Jubault, P.; Pannecoucke, X.; Besset, T. Front. Chem. (Lausanne, Switz.) 2019, 7, 111. doi:10.3389/fchem.2019.00111
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  64. Li, X.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Y.; Rong, J.; Hu, M.; Chen, D.; Xiao, P.; Ni, C.; Wang, L.; Hu, J. Chem. – Asian J. 2016, 11, 1789–1792. doi:10.1002/asia.201600577
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  65. Kremlev, M. M.; Tyrra, W.; Mushta, A. I.; Naumann, D.; Yagupolskii, Y. L. J. Fluorine Chem. 2010, 131, 212–216. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2009.10.011
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  66. Morimoto, H.; Tsubogo, T.; Litvinas, N. D.; Hartwig, J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 3793–3798. doi:10.1002/anie.201100633
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  67. Litvinas, N. D.; Fier, P. S.; Hartwig, J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 536–539. doi:10.1002/anie.201106668
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  68. Lishchynskyi, A.; Grushin, V. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 12584–12587. doi:10.1021/ja407017j
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  69. Mormino, M. G.; Fier, P. S.; Hartwig, J. F. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 1744–1747. doi:10.1021/ol500422t
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  70. Kalkman, E. D.; Mormino, M. G.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 19458–19465. doi:10.1021/jacs.9b10540
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  71. Panferova, L. I.; Miloserdov, F. M.; Lishchynskyi, A.; Martínez Belmonte, M.; Benet-Buchholz, J.; Grushin, V. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 5218–5222. doi:10.1002/anie.201500341
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  72. Huang, Y.; Ajitha, M. J.; Huang, K.-W.; Zhang, Z.; Weng, Z. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 8468–8474. doi:10.1039/c6dt00277c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  73. Serizawa, H.; Aikawa, K.; Mikami, K. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 3456–3459. doi:10.1021/ol501332g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  74. Negishi, K.; Aikawa, K.; Mikami, K. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 4099–4104. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201600711
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  75. Lishchynskyi, A.; Mazloomi, Z.; Grushin, V. V. Synlett 2015, 26, 45–50. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1379497
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  76. Zhu, J.; Ni, C.; Gao, B.; Hu, J. J. Fluorine Chem. 2015, 171, 139–147. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2014.08.011
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  77. Kremlev, M. M.; Mushta, A. I.; Tyrra, W.; Yagupolskii, Y. L.; Naumann, D.; Schäfer, M. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 19693–19699. doi:10.1039/c5dt02925b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  78. Li, L.; Ni, C.; Xie, Q.; Hu, M.; Wang, F.; Hu, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 9971–9975. doi:10.1002/anie.201705734
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  79. Xing, B.; Li, L.; Ni, C.; Hu, J. Chin. J. Chem. 2019, 37, 1131–1136. doi:10.1002/cjoc.201900268
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  80. Mestre, J.; Castillón, S.; Boutureira, O. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 15087–15097. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.9b02001
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  81. Xie, Q.; Li, L.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, R.; Ni, C.; Hu, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 13211–13215. doi:10.1002/anie.201807873
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2020 Ruyet and Besset; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular requires that the authors and source are credited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

 
Back to Article List