Synthesis of optically active folded cyclic dimers and trimers

  1. ,
  2. ,
  3. and
  4. ORCID Logo
Department of Applied Chemistry for Environment, School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Kwansei Gakuin University, 1 Gakuen Uegahara, Sanda, Hyogo 669-1330, Japan
  1. Corresponding author email
Associate Editor: N. Yoshikai
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2025, 21, 1603–1612. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.21.124
Received 29 May 2025, Accepted 30 Jul 2025, Published 11 Aug 2025
A non-peer-reviewed version of this article has been posted as a preprint https://doi.org/10.3762/bxiv.2025.38.v1
Full Research Paper
cc by logo

Abstract

Optically active higher-ordered structures, such as one-handed helical and propeller-shaped structures, can be constructed by folding the π-conjugated system using [2.2]paracyclophane as the chiral crossing unit, leading to circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) properties. Chiral cyclic dimers and trimers were synthesized using planar chiral [2.2]paracyclophane-containing enantiopure ribbon-shaped compounds as the chiral monomers. Unicursal π-conjugated systems were folded at the [2.2]paracyclophane units, and exhibited good photoluminescence quantum efficiencies and CPL anisotropy factors. Opposite chiroptical properties were observed between the dimer and trimer, despite the same absolute configuration of the planar chiral [2.2]paracyclophane units, which was reproduced by theoretical studies.

Introduction

Cyclophane is a general term for cyclic compounds with at least one aromatic ring in the main chain backbone [1]. Cyclophane compounds have long been known; [2.2]paracyclophane was first reported as a cyclic dimer of paraxylylene by Brown et al. in 1949 [2]. In 1951, Cram et al. reported the practical synthesis of [2.2]paracyclophanes via Wurtz-type intramolecular cyclization [3]. [2.2]Paracyclophane has a molecular structure in which two benzene rings are stacked face-to-face with ethylene chains at the para positions. Various studies have been conducted on their reactivities and physical properties derived from their unique molecular structure with stacked π-electron clouds [1,4-6]. The distance between benzene rings in [2.2]paracyclophane is extremely short (2.8–3.1Å), and thus the rotational motion of benzene rings is completely suppressed; therefore, planar chirality without chiral centers [7] appears by introducing substituent(s) at appropriate position(s) on the benzene rings [8]. Enantiopure planar chiral [2.2]paracyclophanes have been used as chiral auxiliaries and chiral ligands for transition metals in the fields of organic and organometallic chemistry [9-20]. In 2012, enantiopure [2.2]paracyclophane was used as a chiral monomer to prepare optically active conjugated polymers and cyclic trimers [21], in which π-electron systems were stacked to form zigzag and triangular structures, respectively. The conjugated polymers and cyclic trimers exhibited circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) [22-25] with high photoluminescence (PL) quantum efficiency (ΦPL) and anisotropy. Additionally, the π-stacked structure of [2.2]paracyclophane can be applied at a crossing point. By folding the π-conjugated system using [2.2]paracyclophane as the chiral crossing unit, optically active higher-ordered structures, such as one-handed helical [26,27] and propeller-shaped structures [28-30], can be constructed, leading to the excellent CPL behaviors. Recently, planar chiral [2.2]paracyclophane-containing cyclic molecules have been received attention; for examples, the one-handed double helical compounds [31-34] and chiral nanohoops [35,36] emitting circularly polarized fluorescence have been reported. In this study, enantiopure ribbon-shaped compounds based on planar chiral tetrasubstituted [2.2]paracyclophane were used as chiral monomers, and optically active cyclic dimers and trimers, in which π-conjugated systems were folded in two and three places, respectively, were synthesized. Planar chiral [2.2]paracyclophane served as crosspoints to construct unicursal cyclic π-conjugated structures. The synthetic procedures and optically properties were investigated.

Results and Discussion

Scheme 1 illustrates the synthetic routes to optically active cyclic dimer and trimer based on planar chiral tetrasubstituted [2.2]paracyclophane. Bis-(para)-pseudo-ortho-typed [15] [2.2]paracyclophane (Sp)-1 was prepared according to a literature’s procedure [31]. The Sonoghashira–Hagihara cross-coupling [37,38] of (Sp)-1 with diiodotolane 2 afforded the corresponding ribbon-shaped compound (Sp)-3 in 39% isolated yield. Triisopropylsilyl (TIPS) groups in (Sp)-3 were removed using Bu4NF to afford diyne (Sp)-4 as a monomer in 45% isolated yield. The reaction of (Sp)-4 with diiodobenzene 5 using a Pd2(dba)3/PPh3/CuI catalytic system in toluene and Et3N under diluted conditions (monomer concentration = approximately 1.3 × 10−3 M) was performed. The corresponding cyclic dimer (Sp)-6 and trimer (Sp)-7 were detected mainly by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and separated roughly using simple SiO2 column chromatography. In addition, they were purified using a recyclable high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to remove unidentified impurities to obtain (Sp)-6 and (Sp)-7 in 16% and 3% isolated yields, respectively.

[1860-5397-21-124-i1]

Scheme 1: Synthesis of cyclic dimer (Sp)-6 and trimer (Sp)-7.

The ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) absorption spectra and normalized photoluminescence (PL) spectra of (Sp)-6 and (Sp)-7 in diluted CHCl3 solutions (1.0 × 10−5 M) are depicted in Figure 1. The absorption bands are derived from the π–π* transitions of a phenylene–ethynylene conjugation system. The spectra of (Sp)-6 and (Sp)-7 are similar, and the absorption peak top of (Sp)-7 is red-shifted compared with that of (Sp)-6 because of the bent structure of the p-phenylene–ethynylene moieties in (Sp)-6 and extended π-conjugation of (Sp)-7. Such a red-shift of a UV–vis absorption spectrum has been observed in previously reported [2.2]paracyclophane-based cyclic oligomers [39].

[1860-5397-21-124-1]

Figure 1: UV–vis and PL spectra of (Sp)-6 and (Sp)-7 in CHCl3 (1.0 × 10−5 M). Excitation wavelength 370 nm and 378 nm for (Sp)-6 and (Sp)-7, respectively.

CHCl3 solutions (1.0 × 10−5 M) of (Sp)-6 and (Sp)-7 were photo-excited around their absorption peak maxima, and both oligomers emitted blue fluorescence as shown in Figure 1. Their PL spectra with vibrational structures were identical, and the PL quantum efficiencies (ΦPL) of both (Sp)-6 and (Sp)-7 were estimated to be 0.65. Their PL of the cast films fabricated from the toluene solutions were also measured, and weak and inefficient luminescence were observed because of the aggregation-caused PL quenching. The PL lifetimes of (Sp)-6 and (Sp)-7 in the CHCl3 solutions were measured at each PL peak maximum; and the PL decay curves (Figure S17, Supporting Information File 1) were fitted with the single exponential function. The lifetimes (τ) were estimated to be 1.6 ns and 1.0 ns, respectively.

Circular dichroism (CD) and CPL spectra of (Sp)-6 and (Sp)-7 were obtained in CHCl3 solutions (1.0 × 10−5 M), and the spectra are shown in Figure 2. As illustrated in Figure 2A, the mirror-image Cotton effect of (Sp)- and (Rp)-6 was observed throughout the absorption band, and the absolute molar ellipticity |[θ]| reached on the order of 106. Intense CPL signals were also obtained, and the |glum| value [23-25] was estimated as 1.0 × 10−3. The glum plots of 6 and 7 are shown in Figure S18A, Supporting Information File 1. Figure 2B shows the CD and CPL spectra of (Sp)- and (Rp)-7. Mirror-image CD signals were observed, and the absolute molar ellipticity (|[θ]|) was smaller than that of 6. The first Cotton effect of (Sp)-7 was negative, in contrast to that of (Sp)-6. The sign of the first Cotton effect was consistent with that of CPL signal; the CPL sign of (Sp)-7 was also negative. Thus, the CD and CPL signs of (Sp)-6 and (Sp)-7 were opposite, despite the planar chiral [2.2]paracyclophane units having the same absolute configuration. The |glum| value of 7 was 0.4 × 10−3 (Figure S18A, Supporting Information File 1), which was lower than that of 6. In the case of the film states of 6 and 7, low PL brightness and intermolecular random orientation of fluorophores resulted in noisy CPL signals.

[1860-5397-21-124-2]

Figure 2: (A) UV, CD, PL, and CPL spectra of (Sp)- and (Rp)-6 in CHCl3 (1.0 × 10−5 M). (B) UV, CD, PL, and CPL spectra of (Sp)- and (Rp)-7 in CHCl3 (1.0 × 10−5 M). Excitation wavelength for CPL of both (Sp)-6 and (Sp)-7 = 300 nm.

The CD spectra were simulated by time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calculations (TD-MN15/6-31G(d)//MN15/6-31G(d). The calculated rotatory strengths of (Sp)-6 and (Sp)-7 were plotted with their observed CD spectra in Figure 3A and 3B, respectively, and the calculated CD spectra are shown in Supporting Information File 1, Figure S19A and S19B, respectively. Thus, the rotatory strengths corresponded well the observed CD spectra (Figure 3A and 3B). The signs of the simulated CD spectrum of (Sp)-6 were positive and negative from the long wavelength to the short wavelength (Figure S19A, Supporting Information File 1), which reproduced the experimental CD spectrum of (Sp)-6. In addition, the signs of the experimental CD spectrum of (Sp)-7, negative and positive from the long wavelength to the short wavelength, were reproduced using the simulated CD spectrum (Figure S19B, Supporting Information File 1).

[1860-5397-21-124-3]

Figure 3: (A) CD spectrum of (Sp)-6 in CHCl3 (1.0 × 10−5 M), and the plot of the calculated rotatory strengths (TD-MN15/6-31G(d)//MN15/6-31G(d)). (B) CD spectrum of (Sp)-7 in CHCl3 (1.0 × 10−5 M), and the plot of the calculated rotatory strengths (TD-MN15/6-31G(d)//MN15/6-31G(d)).

Molecular orbitals of (Sp)-6 and (Sp)-7 in their ground and excited states were calculated using DFT and TD-DFT calculations (Figures S20–S23, Supporting Information File 1). In both molecules, the orbitals were localized to part of the π-conjugation systems rather than the whole system in the ground and excited states due to the twisted structures by the π-stacked [2.2]paracyclophane moieties. The CPL behaviors of (Sp)-6 and (Sp)-7 were investigated by TD-DFT calculations; namely, the electric transition dipole moment (μ), magnetic transition dipole moment (m), and the angle (θ) between μ and m in the S1 states were simulated. The glum value was theoretically calculated by the following equation: glum = 4|μ||m|cosθ/(|μ|2 + |m|2) ≈ 4|m|cosθ/|μ|. The molecular orbitals of (Sp)-6 and (Sp)-7 in the S1 states involved in CPL are illustrated in Supporting Information File 1, Figure 4A and 4B. The molecular orbitals of (Sp)-6 were localized in one curved π-electron system, and the μ extended along the long axis of the molecule. The value of the angle θ of (Sp)-6 was calculated to be 76°, which supported the positive CPL sign. The molecular orbitals of (Sp)-7 in the S1 states are shown in Figure 4B. The orbitals are linearly localized in the portion of the extended π-electron system rather than the entire molecule. Therefore, the elongation of the μ could not be suppressed, and thus a lower |glum| value was obtained. The angle θ of (Sp)-7 was 97°; it is consistent with the negative CPL sign. As described above, the experimental CD and CPL signs of (Sp)-6 and (Sp)-7 were reproduced by the TD-DFT calculations. Molecular orbitals of (Sp)-6 involved in the CPL are obviously curved and twisted, resulting in the opposite chiroptical signs. Twisted chirality is known to result in CPL of π-conjugated molecules; for example, twisted anthracene is a good CPL emitter [40-47]; the more the anthracene is twisted, the better the CPL properties [46]. As for the π-stacked cyclic oligomers, the trimers and tetramers exhibited good CPL properties, whereas the cyclic dimer consisting of curved π-electron systems was not a good CPL emitter [39]. Thus, one of our next targets is to clarify experimentally and theoretically the CPL behavior of linear π-electron systems such as p-phenylene-ethynylene, when they are curved and twisted.

[1860-5397-21-124-4]

Figure 4: Molecular orbitals and simulated CPL profiles in the S1 states of (A) (Sp)-6 and (B) (Sp)-7 (TD-MN15/6-31G(d)).

Conclusion

In summary, two types of optically active oligomers using planar chiral tetrasubstituted [2.2]paracyclophane as chiral crossing units were prepared, in which π-extended conjugated systems were folded in either two or three places. The oligomers exhibited good optical properties such as PL and CPL properties with good ΦPL values (>0.6) and |glum| values of the ordered of 10–4–10–3. The chiroptical properties of dimers and trimers showed opposite Cotton effects and CPL signals, despite the same absolute configuration of the planar chiral [2.2]paracyclophane crossing points. The π-conjugation system of the dimer that exhibited CPL was highly curved and twisted, which caused the different chiroptical properties.

Experimental

General

1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a JEOL JNM ECZ-500R instrument at 500 and 125 MHz, respectively. Samples were analyzed in CDCl3, and the chemical shift values were expressed relative to Me4Si as an internal standard. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed with silica gel 60 Merck F254 plates. Column chromatography was performed with silica gel 60N (spherical neutral). Recyclable preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was carried out on a Japan Analytical Industry Model LC918R (JAIGEL 1H and 2H gel-permeation columns) using CH2Cl2 as an eluent. Recyclable chiral chromatography (HPLC) was carried out on a YMC LC Forte/R (Chiralpak® IA column). High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) was obtained on a Bruker Daltonics microTOF II spectrometer (APCI) by using sodium formate and tuning mix as internal standard or on a JEOL JMS-S3000 spectrometer for matrix-assisted desorption/ionization (MALDI) with trans-2-[3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methyl-2-propenylidene]malononitrile (DCTB) as a matrix. UV–vis absorption spectra were recorded on a JASCO V-730 spectrophotometer, and samples were analyzed in CHCl3 at room temperature. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were recorded on a JASCO FP-8500 spectrofluorometer, and samples were analyzed in CHCl3 at room temperature. Absolute PL quantum efficiency was calculated on a JASCO FP-8500 with an ILF-835 integrating sphere. The PL lifetime measurement was performed on a Hamamatsu Photonics Quantaurus-Tau fluorescence lifetime spectrometer system. Specific rotations ([α]Dt) were measured with a HORIBA SEPA-500 polarimeter: concentration “c” is g/dL. Circular dichroism (CD) spectra were recorded on a JASCO J-1500 spectropolarimeter with CHCl3 as a solvent at room temperature. Circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) spectra were recorded on a JASCO CPL-300 with CHCl3 as a solvent at room temperature.

Materials

Commercially available compounds used without purification are as follows: Pd2(dba)3, SPhos (2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2',6'-dimethoxybiphenyl), PPh3, CuI, Bu4NF, MeOH, dehydrated THF, dehydrated toluene, and 1,4-diiodobenzene (5). Et3N was purchased and distilled over KOH. (Sp)-1 [31], (Rp)-1 [31], and 2 [48] were prepared as described in the literature.

Synthesis of (Sp)-3

A mixture of (Sp)-1 (49.6 mg, 0.081 mmol), 2 (25.3 mg, 0.059 mmol), Pd2(dba)3 (6.1 mg, 0.0067 mmol), SPhos (5.6 mg, 0.014 mmol), CuI (1.8 mg, 0.0095 mmol), toluene (40 mL) and Et3N (40 mL) was placed in a round-bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirring bar. After degassing the reaction mixture several times, the mixture was heated at reflux temperature for 16 h. After the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, the solvent was removed with a rotary evaporator. The residue was purified by column chromatography on SiO2 (CHCl3/hexane = 1/4 v/v as an eluent) and by recyclable HPLC (CH2Cl2 as an eluent) to afford (Sp)-3 (24.6 mg, 0.031 mmol, 39%) as a light yellow solid. Rf = 0.73 (CHCl3/hexane = 1:2 v/v); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 1.20 (s, 42H), 2.97–3.08 (m, 4H), 3.49–3.53 (m, 4H), 7.06 (s, 2H), 7.21 (s, 2H), 7.37–7.40 (m, 4H), 7.60–7.62 (m, 2H), 7.70–7.73 (m, 2H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 11.48, 18.84, 32.32, 32.57, 92.38, 93.65, 93.81, 95.72, 105.99, 125.16, 125.33, 125.42, 125.91, 128.07, 128.27, 131.99, 133.24, 134.65, 135.30, 141.30, 142.58 ppm: HRMS (APCI+) (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd. for C56H62Si2, 791.4463; found, 791.4472; [α]D25 –203.25 (c 0.04, CHCH3).

(Rp)-3 was obtained by the same procedure of (Sp)-3. HRMS (APCI+) (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd. for C56H62Si2, 791.4463; found, 791.4442; [α]D25 = +199.73 (c 0.04, CHCH3).

Synthesis of (Sp)-4

(Sp)-3 (43.0 mg, 0.054 mmol) was dissolved in THF (2 mL), followed by the addition of Bu4NF (1.0 M in THF solution, 0.11 mL). The reaction was carried out at room temperature for 30 min, and then H2O was added to the reaction mixture. The organic layer was extracted three times with CH2Cl2, and the combined organic layers were washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and brine. After drying over MgSO4 and filtration, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by recyclable HPLC (CH2Cl2 as an eluent) to afford (Sp)-4 (11.8 mg, 0.025 mmol, 45%) as a light yellow solid. Rf = 0.43 (CHCl3/hexane = 1:2 v/v). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 2.98–3.09 (m, 4H), 3.39 (s, 2H), 3.43–3.55 (m, 4H), 7.09 (s, 2H), 7.21 (s, 2H), 7.37–7.41 (m, 4H), 7.62–7.65 (m, 2H), 7.70–7.73 (m, 2H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 32.31, 32.43, 81.96, 83.04, 92.45, 93.34, 93.94, 124.30, 125.18, 125.98, 126.02, 128.25, 128.37, 132.22, 133.29, 135.15, 135.42, 141.47, 142.64 ppm; HRMS (APCI+) (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd. for C38H22, 479.1794; found, 479.1774. [α]D25 −278.90 (c 0.04, CHCH3).

(Rp)-4 was obtained by the same procedure of (Sp)-4. HRMS (APCI+) (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd. for C38H22, 479.1794; found, 479.1816. [α]D25 = +278.68 (c 0.04, CHCH3).

Synthesis and isolation of cyclic dimer (Sp)-6 and trimer (Sp)-7

A mixture of (Sp)-4 (18.2 mg, 0.038 mmol), 1,4-diiodobenzene (5, 13.2 mg, 0.040 mmol), Pd2(dba)3 (9.0 mg, 0.0098 mmol), PPh3 (12.2 mg, 0.047 mmol), CuI (2.3 mg, 0.012 mmol), toluene (15 mL) and Et3N (15 mL) was placed in a round-bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirring bar. After degassing the reaction mixture several times, the mixture was heated at reflux temperature for 72 h. After the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, the solvent was removed with a rotary evaporator. The residue was purified by column chromatography on SiO2 (hexane/ethyl acetate = 4:1 v/v as an eluent). The first and second fractions included mainly dimer (Sp)-6 and trimer (Sp)-7, respectively. Dimer (Sp)-6 (6.8 mg, 0.0062 mmol, 16%) was isolated from the first fraction by recyclable HPLC (CH2Cl2 as an eluent) as a light yellow solid. Trimer (Sp)-7 was isolated from the second fraction by recyclable HPLC (CH2Cl2 as an eluent). Further purification of (Sp)-7 was carried out using chiral HPLC (CH2Cl2/hexane = 5:5 v/v as an eluent) to obtain (Sp)-7 (2.0 mg, 0.0012 mmol, 3%) as a yellow solid. Enantiomers were obtained by the same procedure from (Rp)-4.

(Sp)-6. Rf = 0.40 (hexane/ethyl acetate = 4:1 v/v). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 3.12 (m, 8H), 3.46 (m, 4H), 3.60 (m, 4H), 7.23 (s, 8H), 7.31 (s, 8H), 7.38 (m, 8H), 7.64 (m, J = 8.59 Hz, 4H), 7.70 (m, J = 8.59 Hz, 4H) ppm; 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 29.8, 32.5, 32.8, 92.4, 92.7, 93.3, 93.7, 95.0, 123.5, 125.4, 125.8, 126.0, 128.2, 128.4, 131.5, 132.5, 133.1, 135.3, 136.7, 140.7, 141.7 ppm. HRMS (MALDI) (m/z): [M + Ag]+: calcd. for C88H48Ag, 1211.2802; found, 1211.2823. [α]D25 +386.63 (c 0.02, CHCl3).

(Rp)-6. HRMS (MALDI) (m/z): [M + Ag]+calcd. for C88H48Ag 1211.2802; found, 1211.2848. [α]D25 –386.63 (c 0.02, CHCl3).

(Sp)-7. Rf = 0.29 (hexane/ethyl acetate = 4/1 v/v). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 3.10–3.18 (m, 12H), 3.60–3.66 (m, 12H), 7.23 (s, 6H), 7.28 (s, 6H), 7.45–7.47 (m, 12H), 7.70–7.71 (m, 6H), 7.76–7.79 (m, 18H) ppm; 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 32.60, 32.75, 91.31, 92.41, 93.47, 93.99, 94.29, 123.59, 125.14, 125.75, 125.91, 128.17, 128.27, 128.32, 131.70, 132.16, 133.24, 134.60, 135.59, 141.52, 142.25 ppm; HRMS (MALDI) (m/z): [M + Ag]+ calcd. for C132H72Ag 1763.4680; found, 1763.4729; [α]D25 = −739.17 (c 0.01, CHCl3).

(Rp)-7. HRMS (MALDI) (m/z): [M + Ag]+ calcd. for C132H72Ag, 1763.4680; found, 1763.4647; [α]D25 +739.75 (c 0.01, CHCl3).

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Statement of computational methods, NMR and HRMS spectra, PL decay curves, glum charts, calculated ECD spectra, and cartesian coordinates.
Format: PDF Size: 1.5 MB Download

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Professor Kazuo Tanaka and Dr. Masayuki Gon (Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University) for CD and CPL spectroscopy.

Funding

The financial support by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (No. 24H00470) and (B) (25K01822) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Y.M.) is greatly acknowledged. This work was also partly supported by the Toshiaki Ogasawara Memorial Foundation (Y.M.).

Author Contributions

Ena Kumamoto: investigation. Kana Ogawa: investigation. Kazunori Okamoto: formal analysis; investigation. Yasuhiro Morisaki: conceptualization; data curation; funding acquisition; project administration; supervision; writing – original draft.

Data Availability Statement

All data that supports the findings of this study is available in the published article and/or the supporting information of this article.

References

  1. Cyclophanes. Compendium of Chemical Terminology; International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). doi:10.1351/goldbook.c01504
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  2. Brown, C. J.; Farthing, A. C. Nature 1949, 164, 915–916. doi:10.1038/164915b0
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Cram, D. J.; Steinberg, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 5691–5704. doi:10.1021/ja01156a059
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Vögtle, F., Ed. Cyclophane Chemistry: Synthesis, Structures and Reactions; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 1993.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Gleiter, R.; Hopf, H., Eds. Modern Cyclophane Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004. doi:10.1002/3527603964
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Hopf, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9808–9812. doi:10.1002/anie.200800969
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Planar chirality. Compendium of Chemical Terminology; International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). doi:10.1351/goldbook.p04681
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Cram, D. J.; Allinger, N. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 6289–6294. doi:10.1021/ja01628a067
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Rozenberg, V.; Sergeeva, E.; Hopf, H. Cyclophanes as Templates in Stereoselective Synthesis. In Modern Cyclophane Chemistry; Gleiter, R.; Hopf, H., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004; pp 435–462. doi:10.1002/3527603964.ch17
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Rowlands, G. J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 1527–1534. doi:10.1039/b800698a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Gibson, S. E.; Knight, J. D. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 1256–1269. doi:10.1039/b300717k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Aly, A. A.; Brown, A. B. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 8055–8089. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2009.06.034
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Paradies, J. Synthesis 2011, 3749–3766. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1289296
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Delcourt, M.-L.; Felder, S.; Turcaud, S.; Pollok, C. H.; Merten, C.; Micouin, L.; Benedetti, E. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 5369–5382. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.9b00372
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Vorontsova, N. V.; Rozenberg, V. I.; Sergeeva, E. V.; Vorontsov, E. V.; Starikova, Z. A.; Lyssenko, K. A.; Hopf, H. Chem. – Eur. J. 2008, 14, 4600–4617. doi:10.1002/chem.200701683
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  16. David, O. R. P. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 8977–8993. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2012.08.009
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Hassan, Z.; Spuling, E.; Knoll, D. M.; Lahann, J.; Bräse, S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 6947–6963. doi:10.1039/c7cs00803a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Morisaki, Y.; Chujo, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2019, 92, 265–274. doi:10.1246/bcsj.20180259
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Hassan, Z.; Spuling, E.; Knoll, D. M.; Bräse, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 2156–2170. doi:10.1002/anie.201904863
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Felder, S.; Wu, S.; Brom, J.; Micouin, L.; Benedetti, E. Chirality 2021, 33, 506–527. doi:10.1002/chir.23335
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Morisaki, Y.; Hifumi, R.; Lin, L.; Inoshita, K.; Chujo, Y. Polym. Chem. 2012, 3, 2727–2730. doi:10.1039/c2py20530k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Berova, N.; Nakanishi, K.; Woody, R., Eds. Circular Dichroism, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, NY, USA, 2000.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Riehl, J. P.; Muller, F. Comprehensive Chiroptical Spectroscopy; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2012.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  24. Richardson, F. S.; Riehl, J. P. Chem. Rev. 1977, 77, 773–792. doi:10.1021/cr60310a001
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  25. Riehl, J. P.; Richardson, F. S. Chem. Rev. 1986, 86, 1–16. doi:10.1021/cr00071a001
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  26. Miki, N.; Inoue, R.; Morisaki, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2022, 95, 110–115. doi:10.1246/bcsj.20210368
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Matsumura, K.; Inoue, R.; Morisaki, Y. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2310566. doi:10.1002/adfm.202310566
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Morisaki, Y.; Gon, M.; Sasamori, T.; Tokitoh, N.; Chujo, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 3350–3353. doi:10.1021/ja412197j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Gon, M.; Morisaki, Y.; Chujo, Y. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 521–529. doi:10.1039/c4tc02339k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Gon, M.; Kozuka, H.; Morisaki, Y.; Chujo, Y. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2016, 5, 353–359. doi:10.1002/ajoc.201500468
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Morisaki, Y.; Sawada, R.; Gon, M.; Chujo, Y. Chem. – Asian J. 2016, 11, 2524–2527. doi:10.1002/asia.201601028
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  32. Inoue, R.; Kondo, R.; Morisaki, Y. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 15438–15441. doi:10.1039/d0cc06205g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Lian, Z.; He, J.; Liu, L.; Fan, Y.; Chen, X.; Jiang, H. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2752. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38405-9
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. He, J.; Fan, Y.; Lian, Z.; Guo, S.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, H. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2024, 12, 2302221. doi:10.1002/adom.202302221
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. He, J.; Yu, M.-H.; Lian, Z.; Fan, Y.-Q.; Guo, S.-Z.; Li, X.-N.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W.-G.; Cheng, Z.-Y.; Jiang, H. Chem. Sci. 2023, 14, 4426–4433. doi:10.1039/d2sc06825g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Fan, Y.; He, J.; Liu, L.; Liu, G.; Guo, S.; Lian, Z.; Li, X.; Guo, W.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202304623. doi:10.1002/anie.202304623
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y.; Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 16, 4467–4470. doi:10.1016/s0040-4039(00)91094-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Sonogashira, K. Palladium-Catalyzed Alkynylation: Sonogashira Alkyne Synthesis. In Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis; Negishi, E., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp 493–529. doi:10.1002/0471473804
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Tanaka, K.; Inoue, R.; Morisaki, Y. Chem. – Asian J. 2022, 17, e202101267. doi:10.1002/asia.202101267
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  40. Bedi, A.; Shimon, L. J. W.; Gidron, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 8086–8090. doi:10.1021/jacs.8b04447
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Bedi, A.; Gidron, O. Chem. – Eur. J. 2019, 25, 3279–3285. doi:10.1002/chem.201805728
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Bedi, A.; Gidron, O. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 2482–2490. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00271
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  43. Armon, A. M.; Bedi, A.; Borin, V.; Schapiro, I.; Gidron, O. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 5424–5429. doi:10.1002/ejoc.202100865
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  44. Malakar, P.; Borin, V.; Bedi, A.; Schapiro, I.; Gidron, O.; Ruhman, S. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022, 24, 2357–2362. doi:10.1039/d1cp05728f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  45. Bedi, A.; Manor Armon, A.; Diskin-Posner, Y.; Bogosalvsky, B.; Gidron, O. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 451. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28072-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Tsuchiya, M.; Inoue, R.; Tanaka, K.; Morisaki, Y. Chem. – Asian J. 2022, 17, e202200418. doi:10.1002/asia.202200418
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  47. Bedi, A.; Schwartz, G.; Hananel, U.; Manor Armon, A.; Shioukhi, I.; Markovich, G.; Gidron, O. Chem. Commun. 2023, 59, 2011–2014. doi:10.1039/d2cc07074j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Bentley, K. W.; de los Santos, Z. A.; Weiss, M. J.; Wolf, C. Chirality 2015, 27, 700–707. doi:10.1002/chir.22489
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities