Abstract
In the course of screening vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), two new meroterpenoids, streptoquinolines A (1) and B (2), were isolated from a culture of terrestrial Streptomyces sp. TMPU-A0679. The structures of 1 and 2 were elucidated based on spectroscopic analyses, including NMR and MS, and were found to consist of a drimane-type sesquiterpene fused with a highly substituted quinoline moiety. Further structural comparisons and specific rotation data revealed that 1 and 2 were epimers at C-4'. Compounds 1 and 2 both exhibited selective antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including VRE and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, with minimum inhibitory concentrations ranging from 6.25 to 12.5 µg/mL. These results expand the structural and biological diversities of drimane–quinoline-type meroterpenoids and highlight their potential as lead compounds for the development of new antibacterial agents targeting drug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens.
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
The emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria has become a serious public health issue worldwide. Infections caused by these pathogens severely limit available treatment options and contribute to increased mortality rates [1]. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), represented by Enterococcus faecium and E. faecalis, are responsible for infections such as urinary tract infections, bacteremia, and endocarditis, which may lead to severe complications, particularly in elderly or immunocompromised patients [2]. Current treatment relies on only a few agents, including linezolid and daptomycin, and the emergence of resistant strains to these drugs poses an additional clinical challenge [3].
Therefore, the World Health Organization (WHO) revised its Bacterial Priority Pathogens List (BPPL) in 2024, reaffirming VRE as a “High Priority Pathogen” for which research on and the development of new antimicrobial agents are urgently needed [4]. This emphasizes the continuing demand for antibiotics with novel chemical scaffolds and mechanisms of action.
In our ongoing search for anti-VRE agents from microbial resources, we previously reported antimicrobial compounds such as tirandamycin and micrococcin [5,6]. During this study, we isolated two previously unreported meroterpenoids from a culture of Streptomyces sp. TMPU-A0679 and designated them as streptoquinolines A (1) and B (2) (Figure 1). Compounds 1 and 2 possessed a unique skeleton consisting of a drimane-type sesquiterpene fused with a quinoline moiety and both exhibited potent antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria. This study describes the production, isolation, structural elucidation, and antibacterial activities of compounds 1 and 2.
Figure 1: Structures of streptoquinolines A (1) and B (2).
Figure 1: Structures of streptoquinolines A (1) and B (2).
Results and Discussion
The actinomycete strain TMPU-A0679 was isolated from a soil sample collected in Hofu city, Yamaguchi, Japan, and was identified as Streptomyces sp. based on a BLAST analysis of its 16S rDNA sequence. This strain was cultivated on a rotary shaker (180 rpm) at 27 °C for 7 days using a malt extract-based production medium. Harvested mycelia (1.0 L) were extracted with acetone and ethyl acetate, and purification was guided by antibacterial activity against VRE. The crude extract (922 mg) was subjected to ODS column chromatography followed by preparative HPLC, yielding streptoquinolines A (1, 7.50 mg) and B (2, 8.05 mg).
The physicochemical properties of 1 and 2 are summarized in Table 1. Compounds 1 and 2 showed characteristic absorption maxima at 200–202, 214, 231–234, 312, and 349–350 nm in UV spectra. Common IR absorption bands at 3414–3427 and 1620–1680 cm−1 indicated the presence of hydroxy and carbonyl groups, respectively.
Table 1: Physicochemical properties of 1 and 2.
| 1 | 2 | |
| appearance | yellow oil | yellow oil |
| molecular weight | 481 | 481 |
| molecular formula | C28H35NO6 | C28H35NO6 |
| HRMS–ESI (m/z) | ||
| found: | 482.2547 [M + H]+ | 482.2562 [M + H]+ |
| calcd: | 482.2543 [C28H35NO6 + H]+ | 482.2543 [C28H35NO6 + H]+ |
| UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) | 202 (4.1), 214 (sh, 4.1), 234 (sh, 4.0), 313 (3.6), 350 (3.6) | 200 (4.1), 214 (sh, 4.0), 231 (sh, 3.9), 312 (3.6), 349 (3.6) |
| [α]D21 (c 0.1, MeOH) | −75.2 | −86.6 |
| IR (KBr) νmax (cm−1) | 3414, 2930, 1658, 1620, 1423, 1385, 1182, 1087 | 3427, 2930, 1680, 1620, 1404, 1385, 1179, 1128 |
Streptoquinoline A (1): The molecular formula of 1 was elucidated as C28H35NO6 based on HRESIMS measurements. The 13C NMR spectrum (in DMSO-d6) showed 28 signals, which were classified into five methyl carbons, seven sp3 methylene carbons, two sp3 methine carbons, two sp2 methine carbons, two sp3 quaternary carbons, two oxygenated sp3 quaternary carbons, five sp2 quaternary carbons, and three carbonyl carbons from an analysis of the HMQC spectrum. The 1H NMR spectrum (in DMSO-d6) exhibited signals corresponding to five methyl protons, seven sp3 methylene protons, two sp3 methine protons, two sp2 methine protons, and two hydroxy protons. The connectivity of proton and carbon atoms was assigned from the HMQC spectrum (Table 2).
Table 2: 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts in 1 and 2.a
| position | 1 | 2 | ||
| δC | δH (J in Hz) | δC | δH (J in Hz) | |
| 1 | 38.4 t | 1.82 (1H, d, 11.7) | 38.3 t | 1.82 (1H, d, 9.3) |
| 0.97 (1H, m) | 1.00 (1H, m) | |||
| 2 | 18.0 t | 1.58 (1H, m) | 18.0 t | 1.61 (1H, m) |
| 1.43 (1H, m) | 1.44 (1H, m) | |||
| 3 | 41.3 t | 1.38 (1H, m) | 41.3 t | 1.40 (1H, m) |
| 1.15 (1H, m) | 1.18 (1H, m) | |||
| 4 | 32.8 s | – | 32.8 s | – |
| 5 | 55.2 d | 1.04 (1H, d, 11.7) | 55.1 d | 1.06 (1H, m) |
| 6 | 19.2 t | 1.70 (1H, d, 13.7) | 19.1 t | 1.68 (1H, d, 13.2) |
| 1.38 (1H, m) | 1.38 (1H, m) | |||
| 7 | 39.5a t | 2.03 (1H, d, 11.7) | 39.5a t | 2.03 (1H, d, 12.7) |
| 1.58 (1H, m) | 1.60 (1H, m) | |||
| 8 | 77.9 s | – | 78.0 s | – |
| 9 | 51.1 d | 1.58 (1H, m) | 51.1 d | 1.59 (1H, m) |
| 10 | 36.5 s | – | 36.5 s | – |
| 11 | 19.6 t | 2.55b (1H, overlap) | 19.2 t | 2.57 (1H, m) |
| 2.48b (1H, overlap) | 2.42 (1H, m) | |||
| 12 | 33.1 q | 0.89 (3H, s) | 33.1 q | 0.89 (3H, s) |
| 13 | 21.4 q | 0.83 (3H, s) | 21.4 q | 0.83 (3H, s) |
| 14 | 14.5 q | 0.91 (3H, s) | 14.4 q | 0.91 (3H, s) |
| 15 | 20.0 q | 1.15 (3H, s) | 20.2 q | 1.16 (3H, s) |
| 1' | 120.8 s | – | 120.6 s | – |
| 2' | 131.6 s | – | 131.6 s | – |
| 3' | 156.1 s | – | 156.2 s | – |
| 4' | 73.4 s | – | 73.5 s | – |
| 4'-OH | – | 6.22 (1H, s) | 6.19 (1H, s) | |
| 5' | 191.5 s | – | 191.4 s | – |
| 6' | 143.8 s | – | 143.9 s | – |
| 7' | 131.2 d | 7.99 (1H, d, 7.8) | 130.8 d | 8.02 (1H, br s) |
| 8' | 124.2 d | 7.95 (1H, d, 7.8) | 124.1 d | 7.94 (1H, br s) |
| 9' | 143.6 s | – | 143.8 s | – |
| 10' | 165.8 s | – | 165.8 s | – |
| 10'-OOH | – | 12.95 (1H, br s) | 12.95 (1H, br s) | |
| 11' | 51.2 t | 4.02 (1H, d, 17.1) | 51.0 t | 3.83 (1H, d, 12.7) |
| 3.45 (1H, d, 17.1) | 3.46 (1H, d, 12.7) | |||
| 12' | 206.9 s | – | 207.0 s | – |
| 13' | 29.6 q | 1.97 (3H, s) | 29.8 q | 1.99 (3H, s) |
a13C NMR (100 MHz) and 1H NMR (400 MHz) spectra were taken on a JNM-AL-400 (JEOL) in DMSO-d6, and solvent peaks were used as internal standards at 2.49 ppm for 1H NMR and at 39.5 ppm for 13C NMR. bChemical shifts overlapping with solvent peaks were assigned based on 2D NMR correlations.
The planar structure of compound 1 was elucidated by a 2D NMR experiment, including 1H,1H COSY (bold line in Figure 2) and HMBC (arrow in Figure 2) correlations. Three partial structures I–III were initially identified based on 1H,1H COSY correlations: I (H2-1 (δ 1.82, 0.97)/H2-2 (δ 1.58, 1.43)/H2-3 (δ 1.38, 1.15)), II (H-5 (δ 1.04)/H2-6 (δ 1.70, 1.38)/H2-7 (δ2.03, 1.58)), and III (H-9 (δ 1.58)/H2-11 (δ 2.55, 2.48)). 1H,13C HMBC correlations were then observed from the methyl protons H3-12 (δ 0.89) and H3-13 (δ 0.83) to the sp3 methylene carbon C-3 (δ 41.3), the sp3 quaternary carbon C-4 (δ 32.8), and the sp3 methine carbon C-5 (δ 55.2). Correlations were observed from the methyl proton H3-14 (δ 0.91) to the sp3 methylene carbon C-1 (δ 38.4), C-5, the sp3 methine carbon C-9 (δ 51.1), and the sp3 quaternary carbon C-10 (δ 36.5) and from the methyl proton H3-15 (δ 1.15) to the sp3 methylene carbon C-7 (δ 39.5), the oxygenated sp3 quaternary carbon C-8 (δ 77.9), and C-9. These cross-peaks established connectivity among partial structures I–III, confirming a drimane-type sesquiterpene skeleton in compound 1.
Figure 2: Structural elucidation of compounds 1 and 2 by 2D NMR experiments.
Figure 2: Structural elucidation of compounds 1 and 2 by 2D NMR experiments.
Additionally, 1H,1H COSY correlations confirmed the partial structure IV, consisting of two ortho-coupled aromatic protons, H-7' (δ 7.99) and H-8' (δ 7.95). HMBC correlations were observed from the sp2 methine proton H-7' (δ 7.99) to the sp2 quaternary carbon C-1' (δ 120.8), the sp2 quaternary carbon C-2' (δ 131.6), the nitrogenated sp2 quaternary carbon C-3' (δ 156.1), and the nitrogenated sp2 quaternary carbon C-9' (δ 143.6), from the sp2 methine proton H-8' (δ 7.95) to C-2', and the carboxylic carbon C-10' (δ 165.8); additionally, the hydroxy proton 4'-OH (δ 6.22) showed HMBC correlations to C-3', the oxygenated sp3 quaternary carbon C-4' (δ 73.4), and the ketone carbon C-5' (δ 191.5). These correlations clearly indicated the presence of a quinoline moiety. Furthermore, HMBC correlations were observed from the sp3 methylene proton H2-11' (δ 4.02, 3.45) to C-3', C-4', C-5', and the ketone carbon C-12' (δ 206.9) and from the methyl proton H3-13' (δ 1.97) to the sp3 methylene carbons C-11' (δ 51.2) and C-12', establishing the presence of an acetonyl group at C-4'.
HMBC correlations were observed from the sp3 methylene proton H2-11 to C-8, C-1', and the oxygenated sp2 quaternary carbon C-6' (δ 143.8). These correlations indicated that the quinoline unit was fused to a drimane-type sesquiterpene through two key links: a C–O bond between C-8 and C-6' and a C–C bond between C-11 and C-1'. Consequently, the planar structure of compound 1 was elucidated as shown in Figure 1, consistent with the molecular formula and degree of unsaturation.
The relative configuration of compound 1 was elucidated based on ROESY correlations, as shown in Figure 3. Clear ROESY cross-peaks were observed between H-5 and H-7 (δ 1.58)/H-9, as well as between H-6 (δ 1.70) and H3-12, indicating that these protons were located on the same face of the molecule. In contrast, the ROESY correlations between H-6 (δ 1.38) and the methyl protons H3-13, H3-14, and H3-15, together with cross-peaks between H3-14 and H3-15, suggested that these protons resided on the opposite face. These results support a relative configuration of 5R*, 8S*, 9S*, and 10R* for the drimane skeleton of compound 1. However, it was not possible to elucidate the configuration at C-4' from available NMR data.
Streptoquinoline B (2): The molecular formula of compound 2 was elucidated as C28H35NO6 based on HRESIMS measurements. The 13C NMR and 1H NMR spectra (in DMSO-d6) of compound 2 showed chemical shift values that were almost identical to those of compound 1 (Table 2). Furthermore, 2D NMR experiments revealed similar 1H,1H COSY and HMBC correlations as those observed for 1 (Figure 2), confirming that compound 2 shared the same planar structure. The specific rotations of 1 and 2 were similar in both sign and magnitude, suggesting that they shared the same absolute configuration for most chiral centers. However, a notable difference was observed in the chemical shift of H-11' between the two compounds. This difference was consistent with an inversion at C-4', indicating that compounds 1 and 2 were epimers at this position.
Compounds 1 and 2 possessed a functional group at C-4' that appeared to be derived from acetone; therefore, they may be artifacts that formed via the nucleophilic addition of acetone to a ketone-bearing precursor during the extraction process. Despite various modifications to fermentation conditions, it was not possible to detect or isolate the presumed natural precursor. We are currently undertaking the total synthesis of this putative natural precursor to further confirm its structure and biological properties.
To date, only two structurally related meroterpenoids to 1 and 2 have been reported: thallusin [7] and saccharoquinoline [8], both of which share a drimane-type sesquiterpene skeleton. Thallusin was isolated from the marine bacterium Zobellia uliginosa, while saccharoquinoline was obtained from Saccharomonospora sp., another marine-derived actinomycete. Notably, compounds 1 and 2 represent the first examples of drimane–quinoline-type meroterpenoids produced by a terrestrial Streptomyces strain, and their structural relationship to thallusin-type sesquiterpenes suggests a biosynthetic connection; however, the quinoline moieties in 1 and 2 were more highly substituted.
The specific optical rotations of 1 ([α]D −75.2) and 2 ([α]D −86.6) were negative and similar in magnitude to that of synthetic (−)-thallusin sodium salt ([α]D −82.4) [9], suggesting that their drimane cores shared the same absolute configuration (5R,8S,9S,10R). In contrast, saccharoquinoline has been reported to exhibit a positive specific optical rotation ([α]D +55) [8], indicating that its drimane core is the enantiomer of those found in 1, 2, and (−)-thallusin.
The antibacterial activities of 1 and 2 were evaluated by the microdilution method in accordance with the CLSI guideline M07-A11 [10]. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 1 and 2 against nine test microorganisms are summarized in Table 3. Compounds 1 and 2 both exhibited antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including VRE and MRSA, with MICs ranging from 6.25 to 12.5 µg/mL. These results highlight their potential as lead compounds for the development of new antibacterial agents targeting drug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens. In contrast, no inhibitory activity was observed against Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) or mycobacteria (Mycobacterium bovis BCG and M. avium) even at 200 µg/mL, indicating that compounds 1 and 2 possess a relatively narrow, but specific antibacterial spectrum.
Table 3: MICs of 1 and 2.
| Test microorganism | MICs (µg/mL) | ||
| 1 | 2 | control | |
| Enterococcus faecalis | 6.25 | 6.25 | 2.0a |
| Vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis | 6.25 | 6.25 | >256a |
| Multidrug-resistant E. faecium | 12.5 | 12.5 | >256a |
| Staphylococcus aureus | 12.5 | 12.5 | 0.50a |
| Methicillin-resistant S. aureus | 12.5 | 6.25 | 1.0a |
| Escherichia coli | >200 | >200 | 0.0078b |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | >200 | >200 | 0.13b |
| Mycobacterium bovis BCG | >200 | >200 | 0.0020c |
| M. avium | >200 | >200 | 0.25c |
aVancomycin. bCiprofloxacin. cRifampicin.
Previously reported related meroterpenoids, such as thallusin and saccharoquinoline, exhibited no antibacterial biological activities – thallusin acts as an inducer of morphogenesis in some marine algae [7], whereas saccharoquinoline exhibits cytotoxicity towards the HCT-116 cancer cell line through G1 arrest [8]. Therefore, the discovery of antibacterial activity by compounds 1 and 2 expands the known biological potential of drimane–quinoline-type meroterpenoids beyond their previously recognized roles.
Conclusion
Streptoquinolines A (1) and B (2) are novel meroterpenoids featuring a drimane-type sesquiterpene fused with a highly substituted quinoline unit. These compounds were isolated from terrestrial Streptomyces sp. TMPU-A0679 and both exhibited selective antibacterial activity against Gram-positive pathogens, including VRE and MRSA. Structural and stereochemical analyses established that 1 and 2 shared the same planar structure and drimane core configuration (5R,8S,9S,10R), but differed in their stereochemistries at C-4', indicating that they are epimers. Based on the presence of an acetone-derived substituent at C-4', these compounds may be artifacts of a ketone-bearing precursor formed during extraction. The discovery of streptoquinolines expands the structural and biological diversities of drimane–quinoline-type meroterpenoids and provides novel insights into their potential as scaffolds for the development of antibacterial agents targeting multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria.
Experimental
Materials
Ciprofloxacin, rifampicin, and vancomycin were purchased from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan). Yeast extract, malt extract, and peptone were obtained from Becton, Dickinson and Company (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Ehrlich meat extract was purchased from Kyokuto Pharmaceutical Co. (Tokyo, Japan). All other chemicals used in this study were of special grade.
General experimental procedures
HRESIMS spectra were recorded using a mass spectrometer (Xevo G2-XS QTof, Waters Co., Milford, MA, USA). NMR spectra were acquired on a spectrometer (JNM-AL-400; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
Microorganisms
The actinomycete strain TMPU-A0679 was identified as Streptomyces sp. from its 16S rDNA sequence in a BLAST search by TechnoSuruga Laboratory (Shizuoka, Japan). The following strains were used in antibacterial activity assays: E. faecalis ATCC 29212, vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis ATCC 51575, multidrug-resistant E. faecium ATCC 700221, S. aureus NBRC 13276, methicillin-resistant S. aureus ATCC 700698, E. coli NBRC 3972, P. aeruginosa NBRC 13275, M. bovis BCG Pasteur, and M. avium JCM 15430.
Fermentation
In a manner similar to our previous report [5], an agar plate culture of strain TMPU-A0679 grown on ISP medium No. 2 (yeast extract 0.4%, malt extract 1.0%, glucose 0.4%, and agar 1.5%; adjusted to pH 7.3) was used to inoculate a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 100 mL of the seed medium (potato starch 2.4%, yeast extract 0.5%, glucose 0.1%, peptone 0.3%, Ehrlich meat extract 0.3%, and CaCO3 0.4%; adjusted to pH 7.0). The flask was incubated on a rotary shaker at 180 rpm at 27 °C for 4 days. One milliliter of the seed culture was transferred into sixty 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL of ISP2 medium No. 2. Fermentation was conducted on a rotary shaker (Iwashiya Bio Science, Tokyo, Japan) at 180 rpm at 27 °C for 7 days.
Isolation of compounds 1 and 2
The culture broth (6.0 L) was centrifuged to separate the mycelia and supernatant. Collected mycelia were treated with acetone (1.0 L) for 60 minutes. After suction filtration, the acetone solution was concentrated under reduced pressure to remove the solvent. The resulting aqueous solution (400 mL) was extracted twice with EtOAc (400 mL × 2, pH 3). The combined EtOAc layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure to yield crude material (922 mg). This material was then dissolved in a small amount of MeOH, applied to an ODS (Fuji Silysia Chemical Ltd., Aichi, Japan) column (i.d. 20 × 170 mm), and eluted with MeOH aq. solvent system in a stepwise manner (20 mL × 6 fractions for each solvent, 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100% MeOH, acetone). The 80% MeOH aq. eluate was concentrated to give crude materials containing 1 and 2 (23.5 mg). These materials were finally purified by preparative HPLC: column, Develosil C30-UG (Nomura Chemical Co., Ltd., Aichi, Japan), i.d. 10 × 250 mm; mobile phase, 55% MeCN aq. isocratic; detection, UV at 210 nm; flow rate, 3.0 mL /min. Under these conditions, compounds 1 and 2 eluted with retention times of 37 and 34 min, respectively. Each eluate was concentrated and dried in vacuo to yield pure samples of 1 (7.50 mg) and 2 (8.05 mg), respectively, as a yellow oil.
Assessment of MICs using the broth microdilution method
Antibacterial activity was evaluated using the broth microdilution method in accordance with CLSI guideline M07-A11 [10]. Bacterial strains were cultured at 37 °C overnight in Mueller–Hinton broth (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). Overnight cultures were diluted with the same broth and adjusted to an optical density of 0.0548 at 550 nm (approximately 1.0 × 108 CFU/mL). The suspensions were then further diluted 3,000-fold with fresh broth. Aliquots of 95 µL of the diluted suspension were dispensed into the wells of a 96-well microplate, followed by the addition of 5 µL of test samples dissolved in methanol. The microplate was incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours. Bacterial growth was assessed by measuring turbidity at 550 nm using a spectrophotometer. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of the test compound that inhibited ≥90% of bacterial growth relative to the control (no compound).
Supporting Information
| Supporting Information File 1: MS and NMR spectra of streptoquinolines A (1) and B (2). | ||
| Format: PDF | Size: 1.2 MB | Download |
Data Availability Statement
All data that supports the findings of this study is available in the published article and/or the supporting information of this article.
References
-
GBD 2021 Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Lancet 2024, 404, 1199–1226. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01867-1
Return to citation in text: [1] -
O'Driscoll, T.; Crank, C. W. Infect. Drug Resist. 2015, 8, 217–230. doi:10.2147/idr.s54125
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Arias, C. A.; Murray, B. E. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 266–278. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2761
Return to citation in text: [1] -
WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024: bacterial pathogens of public health importance to guide research, development and strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024.
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Yagi, A.; Sato, T.; Kano, C.; Igari, T.; Oshima, N.; Ohte, S.; Ohshiro, T.; Uchida, R. J. Antibiot. 2025, 78, 211–218. doi:10.1038/s41429-024-00805-4
Return to citation in text: [1] [2] -
Yagi, A.; Sato, M.; Kikuchi, K.; Taniguchi, A.; Fukuda, T.; Uchida, R. J. Antibiot. 2025, 78, 481–487. doi:10.1038/s41429-025-00838-3
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Matsuo, Y.; Imagawa, H.; Nishizawa, M.; Shizuri, Y. Science 2005, 307, 1598. doi:10.1126/science.1105486
Return to citation in text: [1] [2] -
Le, T. C.; Lee, E. J.; Lee, J.; Hong, A.; Yim, C.-Y.; Yang, I.; Choi, H.; Chin, J.; Cho, S. J.; Ko, J.; Hwang, H.; Nam, S.-J.; Fenical, W. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 98. doi:10.3390/md17020098
Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] -
Yamamoto, H.; Takagi, Y.; Oshiro, T.; Mitsuyama, T.; Sasaki, I.; Yamasaki, N.; Yamada, A.; Kenmoku, H.; Matsuo, Y.; Kasai, Y.; Imagawa, H. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 8850–8855. doi:10.1021/jo501720b
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Reference methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, approved standard CLSI document M07-A11, 11th ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2019.
Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
| 1. | GBD 2021 Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Lancet 2024, 404, 1199–1226. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01867-1 |
| 5. | Yagi, A.; Sato, T.; Kano, C.; Igari, T.; Oshima, N.; Ohte, S.; Ohshiro, T.; Uchida, R. J. Antibiot. 2025, 78, 211–218. doi:10.1038/s41429-024-00805-4 |
| 6. | Yagi, A.; Sato, M.; Kikuchi, K.; Taniguchi, A.; Fukuda, T.; Uchida, R. J. Antibiot. 2025, 78, 481–487. doi:10.1038/s41429-025-00838-3 |
| 4. | WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024: bacterial pathogens of public health importance to guide research, development and strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024. |
| 3. | Arias, C. A.; Murray, B. E. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 266–278. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2761 |
| 5. | Yagi, A.; Sato, T.; Kano, C.; Igari, T.; Oshima, N.; Ohte, S.; Ohshiro, T.; Uchida, R. J. Antibiot. 2025, 78, 211–218. doi:10.1038/s41429-024-00805-4 |
| 2. | O'Driscoll, T.; Crank, C. W. Infect. Drug Resist. 2015, 8, 217–230. doi:10.2147/idr.s54125 |
| 10. | Reference methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, approved standard CLSI document M07-A11, 11th ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2019. |
| 8. | Le, T. C.; Lee, E. J.; Lee, J.; Hong, A.; Yim, C.-Y.; Yang, I.; Choi, H.; Chin, J.; Cho, S. J.; Ko, J.; Hwang, H.; Nam, S.-J.; Fenical, W. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 98. doi:10.3390/md17020098 |
| 7. | Matsuo, Y.; Imagawa, H.; Nishizawa, M.; Shizuri, Y. Science 2005, 307, 1598. doi:10.1126/science.1105486 |
| 9. | Yamamoto, H.; Takagi, Y.; Oshiro, T.; Mitsuyama, T.; Sasaki, I.; Yamasaki, N.; Yamada, A.; Kenmoku, H.; Matsuo, Y.; Kasai, Y.; Imagawa, H. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 8850–8855. doi:10.1021/jo501720b |
| 8. | Le, T. C.; Lee, E. J.; Lee, J.; Hong, A.; Yim, C.-Y.; Yang, I.; Choi, H.; Chin, J.; Cho, S. J.; Ko, J.; Hwang, H.; Nam, S.-J.; Fenical, W. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 98. doi:10.3390/md17020098 |
| 8. | Le, T. C.; Lee, E. J.; Lee, J.; Hong, A.; Yim, C.-Y.; Yang, I.; Choi, H.; Chin, J.; Cho, S. J.; Ko, J.; Hwang, H.; Nam, S.-J.; Fenical, W. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 98. doi:10.3390/md17020098 |
| 7. | Matsuo, Y.; Imagawa, H.; Nishizawa, M.; Shizuri, Y. Science 2005, 307, 1598. doi:10.1126/science.1105486 |
| 10. | Reference methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, approved standard CLSI document M07-A11, 11th ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2019. |
© 2026 Yagi et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Beilstein-Institut Open Access License Agreement (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/terms), which is identical to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). The reuse of material under this license requires that the author(s), source and license are credited. Third-party material in this article could be subject to other licenses (typically indicated in the credit line), and in this case, users are required to obtain permission from the license holder to reuse the material.